Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011.08.23 City Council AgendaCITYOFUNIVERSITYPARK REGULARCITYCOUNCILMEETING LOCATION:CITYHALLCOUNCILCHAMBER AGENDA#2819 AUGUST23,2011 CALLTOORDER:5:00P.M. 4:00-5:00P.M.WORKSESSIONFORAGENDAREVIEW:CityCouncilConferenceRoom, SecondFloor,CityHall TOSPEAKONANAGENDAITEM AnyonewishingtoaddresstheCouncilonanyitemmustfilloutagreen“RequesttoSpeak”formand returnittotheCitySecretary.WhencalledforwardbytheMayor,beforebeginning theirremarks,speakers areaskedtogotothepodiumandstatetheirnameandaddressfortherecord. I.CALLTOORDER A.INVOCATION:CityManagerBobLivingston B.PLEDGEOFALLEGIANCE:CityManagerBobLivingston/BoyScouts C.INTRODUCTIONOFCOUNCIL:MayorProTemporeJerryGrable D.INTRODUCTIONOFSTAFF:CityManagerBobLivingston II.CONSENTAGENDA A.CONSIDERANDACT:onrequestbyTheRotaryClubofParkCitiestodisplaya helicopteratGoarParkduringtheJuly4,2012paradeandpicnic - Livingston Pg 3 B.CONSIDERANDACT:toawardBidNo.11-07,ConcreteSandandPeaGravel– AnnualContract - Green Pg 11 C.CONSIDERANDACT:onpurchaseofasphaltforrepavingproject - Green Pg 16 D.CONSIDERANDACT:onH-GACPurchaseofMICUfortheFireDepartment - Green Pg 17 E.CONSIDERANDACT:toreviewbidsandawardacontractforstreetreconstruction alongWestwick,southfromShannontoSt.Andrews,andthereplacementofwater, sanitarysewer,andalleypavementintheblockboundedbyShannon,Windsor,and Westwick - Smallwood Pg 25 F.CONSIDERANDACT:onaproposalfromDFWCommunicationsfortheinstallation ofamonopoleatthePeekServiceCenter - Smallwood Pg 33 G.CONSIDERANDACT:onanagreementtosupporttheannualPublicWorksprogram attheNorthCentralTexasCouncilofGovernments(NCTCOG) - Smallwood Pg 55 H.CONSIDERANDACT:onapprovalofanupgradetotheCity'semailsystemfrom Exchange2003toExchange2010 - Irvin Pg 60 I.CONSIDERANDACT:onapprovaloftheRaceJUDICATA5KRunbenefitingthe WoundedWarriorProject - Adams Pg 76 J.CONSIDERANDACT:onordinanceapprovingASCS/Atmos2011RRMsettlement agreement - Austin Pg 79 K.CONSIDERANDACT:toadoptthe2011CertifiedPropertyAppraisalRoll - Austin Pg 94 Page 1 of 184 L.CONSIDERANDACT:onaresolutionapprovingtheAgreementofCooperation betweentheCityofUniversityParkandDallasCountyqualifyingtheCountyforthe CDBG/HOMEentitlementprograms - Spector Pg 97 M.CONSIDERANDACT:onminutesoftheJuly19,2011CityCouncilMeeting - Spector Pg 100 N.CONSIDERANDACT:onminutesoftheJuly28,2011CityCouncilMeeting - Spector Pg 107 III.MAINAGENDA A.CONSIDERANDACT:onpresentationofproposedFY2012CityManager'sBudget andpublichearingsonbudgetandtaxrate - Austin Pg 109 B.CONSIDERANDACT:toreviewbidsandawardacontractforPardoePark/ HuntersGlenmedianimprovements - Bradley Pg 182 IV.PUBLICCOMMENTS AnyonewishingtoaddressanitemnotontheAgendashoulddosoatthistime.Pleasebe advisedthatundertheTexasOpenMeetingsAct,theCouncilcannotdiscussoractatthis meetingonamatterthatisnotlistedontheAgenda.However,inresponsetoaninquiry,a Councilmembermayrespondwithastatementofspecificfactualinformationora recitationofexistingpolicy.ItistheCouncil’spolicytorequestthatcitizensnotaddress itemsthatarecurrentlyscheduledforafutureagendaorpublichearing.Instead,theCouncil requeststhatcitizensattendthatspecificmeetingtoexpresstheiropinions,orcommentto theCouncilbye-mailatCity-Council@uptexas.orgorletteraddressedtotheMayorand Councilat3800UniversityBlvd.,UniversityPark,Texas75205.Otherquestionsorprivate commentsfortheCityCouncilorStaffshouldbedirectedtothatindividualimmediately followingthemeeting. AsauthorizedbySection551.071(2)oftheTexasGovernmentCode,thismeetingmaybeconvened intoClosedExecutiveSessionforthepurposeofseekingconfidentiallegaladvicefromtheCity AttorneyonanyAgendaitemslistedherein. Page 2 of 184 AGENDAMEMO (8/23/2011AGENDA) TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil FROM:BobLivingston,CityManager SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onrequestbyTheRotaryClubofParkCitiestodis playa helicopteratGoarParkduringtheJuly4,2012par adeandpicnic BACKGROUND: Thedisplaywillbeinthesameplaceandmanneras atthe2011eventwhichwasverywellattended. TheRotaryClubwillhandleallarrangementsandpr ovidethenecessaryinsurancecoverage.Acopy ofthemilitaryaerialsupportrequestforthe2012 eventisincludedaswellasacopyofthecurrent year'sinsurancepolicy. RECOMMENDATION: Staffrecommendsapproval. ATTACHMENTS: RotaryClubRequestLtr MilitaryAerialSupportRequestForm 2011InsurancePolicy Page 3 of 184 Page 4 of 184 Page 5 of 184 Page 6 of 184 Page 7 of 184 Page 8 of 184 Page 9 of 184 Page 10 of 184 AGENDAMEMO (8/23/2011AGENDA) TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil FROM:ChristineGreen,PurchasingAgent SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:toawardBidNo.11-07,Concrete SandandPeaGravel– AnnualContract BACKGROUND: TheCitysolicitedbidsforanannualcontractfor ConcreteSandandPeaGravelforusebythe InfrastructureMaintenanceDepartment.Wereceived ninebidsinall. DFWMaterialsisthelowbidderwithabidof$16.0 0pertonforconcretesandand$16.50pertonfor peagravel.Thedepartmentestimatesthatitwills pend$58,100onthesematerialsviathiscontract. Abidtabulationfollowsthismemo. RECOMMENDATION: StaffrecommendsawardingBid#11-07forthepurcha seofconcretesandandpeagraveltoDFW Materialsintheestimatedannualamountof$58,100 . ATTACHMENTS: Bid#11.07DFWMtls Page 11 of 184 Bid #11-07 -CONCRETE SAND & PEA GRAVEL -ANNUAL CONTRACT Creation Date Jul 29, 2011 End Date Aug 11, 2011 10:00:00 AM CDT Start Date Jul 29, 2011 5:00:20 PM CDT Awarded Date Not Yet Awarded DFW MATERIALS $58,100.00 (2/2 items) Bid Contact CHRISTOPHER L LOY chrisloy@dfwmaterials.com Ph 817-378-8133 Address P.O. BOX 79026 SAGINAW, TX 76179 Agency Notes:Supplier Notes: Item # Line Item Unit Price Qty/Unit Total Price 11- 07-- 01- 01 CONCRETE SAND -First Offer $16.00 2600 / ton $41,600.00 Product Code: 750-77 Agency Notes: Supplier Product Code: Supplier Notes: 11- 07-- 01- 02 PEA GRAVEL -First Offer $16.50 1000 / ton $16,500.00 Product Code: 750-77 Agency Notes: Supplier Product Code: Supplier Notes: CJA Enterprises LLP $64,520.00 (2/2 items) Bid Contact Carla Peacock astrideapp@msn.com Ph 540-840-1960 Address 362 Crossroads Rd Collinsville, TX 76233 Bid Notes delivery 24 hours ARO minimum delivery 25 tons Agency Notes:Supplier Notes:delivery 24 hours ARO minimum delivery 25 tons Item # Line Item Unit Price Qty/Unit Total Price 11- 07-- 01- 01 CONCRETE SAND -First Offer $18.20 2600 / ton $47,320.00 Product Code: 750-77 Agency Notes: Supplier Product Code: Supplier Notes: 11- 07-- 01- 02 PEA GRAVEL -First Offer $17.20 1000 / ton $17,200.00 Product Code: 750-77 Agency Notes: Supplier Product Code: Supplier Notes: Tim Beaty Builders $67,250.00 (2/2 items) Bid Contact Max Roberson mroberson@tbbuilders.com Ph 940-453-7074 Address 421 E. Hickory Denton, TX 76201 Bid Notes Please see attachments for Conflict of Interest and Reference documents. Feel free to call me (Max Roberson) at 940-453-7074 with any questions, or if there is anything else we can do for you. City of University Park Aug 17, 2011 1:08:23 PM CDT p. 1 Page 12 of 184 Thank you, Max Roberson mroberson@tbbuilders.com 940-453-7074 Agency Notes:Supplier Notes:Please see attachments for Conflict of Interest and Reference documents. Feel free to call me (Max Roberson) at 940-453-7074 with any questions, or if there is anything else we can do for you. Thank you, Max Roberson mroberson@tbbuilders.com 940-453-7074 Item # Line Item Unit Price Qty/Unit Total Price 11- 07-- 01- 01 CONCRETE SAND -First Offer $18.75 2600 / ton $48,750.00 Product Code: 750-77 Agency Notes: Supplier Product Code: Supplier Notes:Please see attachments for Conflict of Interest and Reference documents. Feel free to call me (Max Roberson) at 940-453-7074 with any questions, or if there is anything else we can do for you. Thank you, Max Roberson mroberson@tbbuilders.com 940-453-7074 11- 07-- 01- 02 PEA GRAVEL -First Offer $18.50 1000 / ton $18,500.00 Product Code: 750-77 Agency Notes: Supplier Product Code: Supplier Notes:Please see attachments for Conflict of Interest and Reference documents. Feel free to call me (Max Roberson) at 940-453-7074 with any questions, or if there is anything else we can do for you. Thank you, Max Roberson mroberson@tbbuilders.com 940-453-7074 Denton Sand & Gravel, Inc.$70,640.00 (2/2 items) Bid Contact Steve Shackelford ShackMail@EarthLink.net Ph 940-566-4664 Fax 940-458-3278 Address 10531 FM 2450 Sanger, TX 76266 Agency Notes:Supplier Notes: Item # Line Item Unit Price Qty/Unit Total Price 11- 07-- 01- 01 CONCRETE SAND -First Offer $19.90 2600 / ton $51,740.00 City of University Park Aug 17, 2011 1:08:23 PM CDT p. 2 Page 13 of 184 Product Code: 750-77 Agency Notes: Supplier Product Code:Concrete Sand Supplier Notes: 11- 07-- 01- 02 PEA GRAVEL -First Offer $18.90 1000 / ton $18,900.00 Product Code: 750-77 Agency Notes: Supplier Product Code:Pea Gravel -Tan Supplier Notes: Lowery Sand & Gravel Co. Inc.$70,950.00 (2/2 items) Bid Contact Keith Lowery klowery55@gmail.com Ph 817-265-5572 Address P O Box 120395 Arlington, TX 76012 Agency Notes:Supplier Notes: Item # Line Item Unit Price Qty/Unit Total Price 11- 07-- 01- 01 CONCRETE SAND -First Offer $19.50 2600 / ton $50,700.00 Product Code: 750-77 Agency Notes: Supplier Product Code: Supplier Notes: 11- 07-- 01- 02 PEA GRAVEL -First Offer $20.25 1000 / ton $20,250.00 Product Code: 750-77 Agency Notes: Supplier Product Code: Supplier Notes: Turf Materials Inc.$84,346.00 (2/2 items) Bid Contact Tony Campagna tony@turfmaterials.com Ph 972-412-3425 Fax 972-692-6623 Address PO Box 1194 Rowlett, TX 75030 Agency Notes:Supplier Notes: Item # Line Item Unit Price Qty/Unit Total Price 11- 07-- 01- 01 CONCRETE SAND -First Offer $22.31 2600 / ton $58,006.00 Product Code: 750-77 Agency Notes: Supplier Product Code: Supplier Notes: 11- 07-- 01- 02 PEA GRAVEL -First Offer $26.34 1000 / ton $26,340.00 Product Code: 750-77 Agency Notes: Supplier Product Code: Supplier Notes: Neese Materials, Inc.$90,460.00 (2/2 items) Bid Contact Heather Mayes sales@neesematerials.com Ph 972-278-1585 Fax 972-421-1856 Address 1919 S. Shiloh Rd. Suite 312-LB2 Garland, TX 75042 Agency Notes:Supplier Notes: Item Line Item Unit Price Qty/Unit Total Price City of University Park Aug 17, 2011 1:08:23 PM CDT p. 3 Page 14 of 184 # 11- 07-- 01- 01 CONCRETE SAND -First Offer $24.85 2600 / ton $64,610.00 Product Code: 750-77 Agency Notes: Supplier Product Code: Supplier Notes:Prices are quoted in trailers. 11- 07-- 01- 02 PEA GRAVEL -First Offer $25.85 1000 / ton $25,850.00 Product Code: 750-77 Agency Notes: Supplier Product Code: Supplier Notes:Prices are quoted in trailers. Lone Star Trucking & Excavation $91,500.00 (2/2 items) Bid Contact Carmelo Chavez lstae@hotmail.com Ph 817-412-8996 Fax 817-926-4486 Address 215 e mason st ft worth, TX 76110 Agency Notes:Supplier Notes: Item # Line Item Unit Price Qty/Unit Total Price 11- 07-- 01- 01 CONCRETE SAND -First Offer $25.00 2600 / ton $65,000.00 Product Code: 750-77 Agency Notes: Supplier Product Code: Supplier Notes: 11- 07-- 01- 02 PEA GRAVEL -First Offer $26.50 1000 / ton $26,500.00 Product Code: 750-77 Agency Notes: Supplier Product Code: Supplier Notes: The LETCO Group, LLC (dba) Living Earth Technology, Elliott's Agri-Service $105,800.00 (2/2 items) Bid Contact Lora Hinchcliff PTomaso@letcogroup.com Ph 972-506-8575 Address 1901 California Crossing Dallas, TX 75220 Agency Notes:Supplier Notes: Item # Line Item Unit Price Qty/Unit Total Price 11- 07-- 01- 01 CONCRETE SAND -First Offer $28.00 2600 / ton $72,800.00 Product Code: 750-77 Agency Notes: Supplier Product Code: Supplier Notes: 11- 07-- 01- 02 PEA GRAVEL -First Offer $33.00 1000 / ton $33,000.00 Product Code: 750-77 Agency Notes: Supplier Product Code: Supplier Notes: City of University Park Aug 17, 2011 1:08:23 PM CDT p. 4 Page 15 of 184 AGENDAMEMO (8/23/2011AGENDA) TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil FROM:ChristineGreen,PurchasingAgent SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onpurchaseofasphaltforrepavi ngproject BACKGROUND: TheCitysolicitedbids(Bid#11-06)fortheupcomi ngin-placerecyclingofasphaltpavementsproject tobeperformedbyCutlerRepaving.Wereceivedone bidfromAustinAsphaltintheamountof$55 perton.AustinAsphaltalsohasanannualcontract withTarrantCountyCooperativePurchasing Program.Thepriceonthecontractis$53.40perto n,andweareallowedtopickuptheasphaltfrom theirDallasplant. APACdidnotsubmitabidorprovidetheircooperat ivecontractpricing. Belowisasummaryofthetwooptionsforpurchasin gasphaltforthisproject: Vendor Price/tonEst.qty.Est.to tal AustinAsphalt(TarrantCountyCoop)$53.4 07700tons$411,180 AustinAsphalt(Bid#11-06)$55.007700tons$423,500 RECOMMENDATION: StaffrecommendsrejectingthebidreceivedforBid #11-06andpurchasingasphaltinsteadfrom AustinAsphaltviatheTarrantCountyCooperativeP urchasingProgram. Page 16 of 184 AGENDAMEMO (8/23/2011AGENDA) TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil FROM:ChristineGreen,PurchasingAgent SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onH-GACPurchaseofMICUforthe FireDepartment BACKGROUND: ThismemosupplementsChiefHowell’smemoregardingthepurchaseofareplacementMICU forthe FireDepartment.ThisequipmentisavailablefromF razerviaContractNo.AM04-10withthe Houston-GalvestonAreaCouncilofGovernments(H-GA C)CooperativePurchasing Program.HGACcontractpurchasessatisfythestatut orycompetitivebidrequirements. DallasDodgeChryslerJeepisthelocaldealerfor Frazerandwillbethecontractvendor. ATTACHMENTS: ChiefHowell'sAgendaMemo MICUpurchase-supportingdocuments Page 17 of 184 AGENDA MEMO (8/23/2011 AGENDA) TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM:Randy Howell, Fire Chief SUBJECT:CONSIDER AND ACT: Purchase of Replacement M.I.C.U. BACKGROUND: The existing fire department fleet includes a 2001 Frazer M.I.C.U that serves as the primary reserve. This unit has exceeded its ten year projected service life and is in need of replacement. A committee based approach has been utilized to research purchase options and make a recommendation on the unit most suited for our unique needs and requirements. In order to ensure that all factors were taken into consideration, this committee included practicing fire department paramedics and representatives from fleet maintenance. After reviewing the committee's findings, I agree with their recommendation and consider the unit selected to be both cost effective and functional. Please find attached the selected vendor’s proposal for the replacement unit and related equipment. Also included are documents providing costs associated with the mobile computer and related IT equipment. Itemized: GPS unit for CAD automatic vehicle locator-$646.67 CF-31TB vehicle computer docking station-$5,204 Frazer Type I 14' Generator Powered Module and 2012 Dodge Ram 4500 6.7L diesel chassis and related equipment-$200,900 Total amount of funding being requested for this replacement purchase is $206,750.67. FUNDING SOURCE: Vehicle Replacement Fund ATTACHMENTS: M.I.C.U. Purchase Docs. Page 18 of 184 Page 19 of 184 Page 20 of 184 Page 21 of 184 Page 22 of 184 Page 23 of 184 Page 24 of 184 AGENDAMEMO (8/23/2011AGENDA) TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil FROM:GeneR.Smallwood,P.E.;DirectorofPublicWorks SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:toreviewbidsandawardacontractforstreetreco nstruction alongWestwick,southfromShannontoSt.Andrews,andthereplacementofwater, sanitarysewer,andalleypavementintheblockbou ndedbyShannon,Windsor,and Westwick. BACKGROUND: Asstatedabove,Project49150includesreconstruct ionofWestwicksouthfromShannontoSt. Andrews.Water,sanitarysewer,andalleypavement willbereplacedintheWindsor-Shannonalley betweenShannonandWestwick.Priortothestreetr econstruction,thewater,andsanitarysewer replacementwillextendsouthinWestwick(fromthe westendoftheWindsor-Shannonalley)toSt. Andrews.Citystaffwillcoordinatethisprojectw ithATMOSEnergy,whowillbereplacingtheirgas maininthealley. ThisprojectwasadvertisedintheParkCitiesNews on07.21.11and07.28.11,andbidswerereceived onTuesday,08.10.11.Thelowbidfortheworkwas submittedbyCPS-Civil,LLCintheamountof $530,775.Thecontractormeetsalltechnicalspeci ficationsfortheproject,andfundsareavailable in theCapitalProjectsFund.Thecontractorhasexpe riencewiththeCity,havingrecentlycompleted constructionofthe24"emergencywatermainalong Roland,northfromMockingbirdtothenew boosterpumpingstationinGermanyPark. Acopyofthebidtabulationsheetisattachedfor yourreview. RECOMMENDATION: StaffrecommendstheCityCouncilapprovethebids andauthorizetheCityManagertoexecutea contractwithCPS-Civil,LLCintheamountof$530,775. FUNDINGSOURCE: CAPITALPROJECTFUND AcctNo42.42.4430 ProjectNo49150.2300 ATTACHMENTS: SiteMap BidTabulation Page 25 of 184 Page 26 of 184 Bid Tabulations for Water, Sanitary Sewer and Alley Improvements - Project No. 49150 August 9, 2011 Item UnitTotalUnitTotalUnitTotalUnitTotal No.Quantity Unit Description Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount SECTION 1 - SANITARY SEWER S1 4EA.Remove Existing Manhole (4'-0")$500.00$2,000.00$300.00$1,200.00$500.00$2,000.00$400.00$1,600.00 S2 2EA.Cut & Plug Existing 8" Sanitary Sewer (Concrete Plug)$750.00$1,500.00$300.00$600.00$500.00$1,000.00$170.00$340.00 S3 505LF 8" PVC-SDR-35 Gravity Sewer Pipe w/ Recycled Concrete Mix Backfill & Embedment $75.00$37,875.00$83.00$41,915.00$119.50$60,347.50$125.00$63,125.00 S4 450LF 8" PVC-SDR-26 Class 160 PSI Pressure Sewer Pipe w/ Recycled Concrete Mix Backfill & Embedment $75.00$33,750.00$115.00$51,750.00$124.50$56,025.00$194.00$87,300.00 S5 10LF 8" PVC-SDR-26 Class 160 PSI Pressure Sewer Pipe Stub-Out w/ Recycled Concrete Mix Backfill & Embedment $65.00$650.00$85.00$850.00$130.00$1,300.00$207.00$2,070.00 S6 13EA.4" Sanitary Sewer Service w/ Two Way Cleanout $800.00$10,400.00$1,100.00$14,300.00$1,050.00$13,650.00$1,135.00$14,755.00 S7 6EA. Construct 4.0' Dia. Manhole w/ Cover & Frame (Pamrex 32", East Jordon Iron Works 30" Ergo XL) $4,000.00$24,000.00$4,000.00$24,000.00$3,400.00$20,400.00$5,100.00$30,600.00 S8 1EA.Connect 6" SDR-35 PVC Drop Connection (Outside of Manhole)$1,200.00$1,200.00$550.00$550.00$1,150.00$1,150.00$2,400.00$2,400.00 S9 1EA.Connect 8" SDR-35 PVC Drop Connection (Outside of Manhole)$1,500.00$1,500.00$660.00$660.00$1,300.00$1,300.00$2,600.00$2,600.00 S10 1EA.Connect 12" PVC-SDR-26 Class 160 PSI Pressure Sewer Pipe to Existing Manhole $1,000.00$1,000.00$800.00$800.00$1,000.00$1,000.00$1,750.00$1,750.00 S11 1LSTrench Safety Design and Installation$2,000.00$2,000.00$1,500.00$1,500.00$2,500.00$2,500.00$3,000.00$3,000.00 S12 1LSSystem Test$500.00$500.00$1,800.00$1,800.00$500.00$500.00$850.00$850.00 SECTION 1 - SANITARY SEWER TOTAL BASE BID $116,375.00 $139,925.00 $161,172.50 $210,390.00 CPS Civil, LLCRKM Utility ServicesJohn Burns ConstructionSYB Construction Page 27 of 184 Bid Tabulations for Water, Sanitary Sewer and Alley Improvements - Project No. 49150 August 9, 2011 W11235LF 3" Yelomine PVC Pipe Class 250 Temporary Water Line (Cost includes placement, maintenance, and removal) $15.00$18,525.00$8.00$9,880.00$10.00$12,350.00$9.50 $11,732.50 W24EA. Connect 3" Temporary Water to Existing Water Lines Per Location (Cost includes placement, maintenance, and removal) $500.00$2,000.00$1,500.00$6,000.00$1,500.00$6,000.00$4,200.00$16,800.00 W318EA. Temporary 1" Water Service to Meter (Cost includes placement, maintenance, and removal) $50.00$900.00$150.00$2,700.00$500.00$9,000.00$225.00$4,050.00 W43 Temporary 2" Water Service to Meter (Cost includes placement, maintenance, and removal) $100.00$300.00$400.00$1,200.00$950.00$2,850.00$680.00$2,040.00 W58EA.Remove Existing Valve$200.00$1,600.00$150.00$1,200.00$275.00$2,200.00$235.00$1,880.00 W62EA.Remove and Salvage Existing Fire Hydrant$500.00$1,000.00$200.00$400.00$700.00$1,400.00$400.00$800.00 W72EA.Construct Fire Hydrant Assembly With 6" Valve $4,000.00$8,000.00$3,600.00$7,200.00$4,000.00$8,000.00$4,275.00$8,550.00 W810EA.Cut & Plug Existing Water Mains (Water Tight, Concrete/Mechanical Joint)$400.00$4,000.00$425.00$4,250.00$1,500.00$15,000.00 $350.00$3,500.00 W91EA.4" Ductile Iron Resilient Wedge Gate Valve$500.00$500.00$850.00$850.00$825.00$825.00$740.00$740.00 W107EA.8" Ductile Iron Resilient Wedge Gate Valve$1,000.00$7,000.00$1,400.00$9,800.00$1,425.00$9,975.00$1,225.00$8,575.00 W1120LF 4" D.I. Pipe Class 51 w/ Poly Wrap w/ Recycled Concrete Backfill and Embedment $50.00$1,000.00$75.00$1,500.00$125.00$2,500.00$108.00$2,160.00 W121EA.Connect to Exist 8" Water $750.00$750.00$750.00$750.00$1,000.00$1,000.00$1,950.00$1,950.00 W131EA.Connect to Exist 6" Water $650.00$650.00$850.00$850.00$1,000.00$1,000.00$1,900.00$1,900.00 W143EA.Connect to Exist 4" Water $500.00$1,500.00$500.00$1,500.00$1,000.00$3,000.00$1,850.00$5,550.00 SECTION 2 - WATER Page 28 of 184 Bid Tabulations for Water, Sanitary Sewer and Alley Improvements - Project No. 49150 August 9, 2011 W151LS Relocate Sample Station - CUP (Includes 1" service connection from proposed 8" water main and testing station) $2,500.00$2,500.00$1,350.00$1,350.00$1,500.00$1,500.00$1,400.00$1,400.00 W161LSTrench Safety Design & Installation$2,000.00$2,000.00$1,500.00$1,500.00$2,500.00$2,500.00$1,250.00$1,250.00 W171LSSystem Test $2,000.00$2,000.00$1,800.00$1,800.00$500.00$500.00$1,400.00$1,400.00 SECTION 2 - WATER TOTAL BASE BID $54,225.00 $52,730.00 $79,600.00 $74,277.50 ALTERNATE BID ITEM 1. (PVC PIPE C900) W8-A11185LF 8" C-900 DR14 PVC Pipe w/ Poly Wrapped Fittings, Recycled Concrete Backfill and Embedment $65.20$77,262.00$65.00$77,025.00$110.00$130,350.00$86.00$101,910.00 W11-A118EA.New 1" Copper Service w/ Meter Box (Includes Tapping Saddle)$950.00$17,100.00$975.00$17,550.00$1,000.00$18,000.00$815.00$14,670.00 W12-A14EA.New 1.5" Copper Service w/ Meter Box (Includes Tapping Saddle)$1,003.00$4,012.00$2,200.00$8,800.00$2,600.00$10,400.00$1,905.00$7,620.00 ALTERNATE BID ITEM 1. (PVC PIPE C900) TOTAL $98,374.00 $103,375.00 $158,750.00 $124,200.00 ALTERNATE BID ITEM 2. (DI PIPE CLASS 51) W8-A21185LF 8" D.I. Pipe Class 51 w/ Poly Wrap w/ Recycled Concrete Backfill and Embedment $80.00$94,800.00$75.00$88,875.00$140.00$165,900.00$96.00$113,760.00 W11-A118EA.New 1" Copper Service w/ Meter Box$1,025.00$18,450.00 $800.00$14,400.00$1,150.00$20,700.00$700.00$12,600.00 W12-A14EA.New 2" Copper Service w/ Meter Box $1,000.00$4,000.00$2,200.00$8,800.00$2,650.00$10,600.00$1,440.00$5,760.00 ALTERNATE BID ITEM 2. (DI PIPE CLASS 51) TOTAL $117,250.00 $112,075.00 $197,200.00 $132,120.00 SECTION 3 - PAVING P11LSMobilization $30,000.00$30,000.00$63,800.00$63,800.00$25,000.00$25,000.00$17,500.00$17,500.00 P24,650LFSawed Breakout Line-Full Depth $2.00$9,300.00$2.00$9,300.00$2.00$9,300.00$2.00$9,300.00 P3515SYRemove Concrete Alley Pvmt.$10.00$5,150.00$11.00$5,665.00$10.00$5,150.00$9.00$4,635.00 P41,150SYRemove Asphalt Pvmt. - Westwick Rd$15.00$17,250.00$11.00$12,650.00$10.00$11,500.00$12.50$14,375.00 P51,215SFRemove Concrete Sidewalk$1.00$1,215.00$0.70$850.50$1.80$2,187.00$2.00$2,430.00Page 29 of 184 Bid Tabulations for Water, Sanitary Sewer and Alley Improvements - Project No. 49150 August 9, 2011 P680SY Remove Reinforced Concrete Driveway Approach $10.00$800.00$11.00$880.00$10.00$800.00$10.00$800.00 P755SY Remove Reinforced Concrete Alley Approach $10.00$550.00$11.00$605.00$10.00$550.00$8.00$440.00 P8525LF Remove Existing Reinforced Concrete Curb & Gutter $3.00$1,575.00$3.50$1,837.50$7.00$3,675.00$2.50$1,312.50 P9375SY Remove Existing Asph. Concrete Pvmt. w/Reinf. Concrete Base (4" HMAC Average and 6" Concrete Base) $15.00$5,625.00$13.00$4,875.00$10.00$3,750.00$23.00 $8,625.00 P9A375SY Replace Asph. Concrete Pvmt. w/Reinf. Concrete Base (4" HMAC Average and 6" Concrete Base) $55.00$20,625.00$76.00$28,500.00$68.50$25,687.50$58.00$21,750.00 P10360SY Temporary Pavement Repair (2" HMAC and Recycled Concrete Mix Backfill and Compacted Selected Backfill) (Cost includes placement, maintenance, and removal) $20.00$7,200.00$24.00$8,640.00$17.50$6,300.00$9.00$3,240.00 P111,250SY 6" Reinforced Concrete Pvmt Class "C", 6 Sack, 3600 PSI @ 28 Days $50.00$62,500.00$45.00$56,250.00$40.25$50,312.50$49.00$61,250.00 P121,050LF 6" Integral Reinforced Concrete Curb Class "C", 6 Sack, 3600 PSI @ 28 Days $2.00$2,100.00$1.15$1,207.50$2.00$2,100.00$10.00$10,500.00 P131,850SF 4" Reinforced Concrete Sidewalk Class "A", 5 Sack, 3000 PSI @ 28 Days $4.00$7,400.00$4.50$8,325.00$3.90$7,215.00$33.50$61,975.00 P149EA Barrier-free Ramps (ADA Compliant) (Brick to be supplied by City of University Park)$1,000.00$9,000.00$900.00$8,100.00$1,200.00$10,800.00$1,045.00$9,405.00 P1555SY 6" Reinforced Concrete Alley Approach Class "C", 6 Sack, 3600 PSI @ 28 Days $40.00$2,200.00$56.00$3,080.00$40.00$2,200.00$42.00 $2,310.00 P16515SY 8"-5"-8" Reinforced Concrete Alley Class "C", 6 Sack, 3600 PSI @ 28 Days $38.00$19,570.00$44.00$22,660.00$62.00$31,930.00$45.00$23,175.00 P17145SY Alley - Surface Gravel w/ Aggregate Sub- base (Complete in Place)$25.00$3,625.00$34.00$4,930.00$20.00$2,900.00$77.00 $11,165.00 P1812SY 8" Reinforced Concrete Pvmt Class "A", 5 Sack, 3000 PSI @ 28 Days - Slope Protection $50.00$600.00$150.00$1,800.00$100.00$1,200.00$55.00 $660.00 Page 30 of 184 Bid Tabulations for Water, Sanitary Sewer and Alley Improvements - Project No. 49150 August 9, 2011 P19250SY Replace Plant Material (Bermuda, St. Augustine, Asian Jasmine, or Other) (Contractor Must Replace w/ Same Plant Material) $10.00$2,500.00$10.00$2,500.00$5.00$1,250.00$9.00$2,250.00 P201LS Repair and Replace Irrigation Lines, Valves, Heads, etc. as Needed $5,000.00$5,000.00$2,000.00$2,000.00$1,000.00$1,000.00$1,450.00$1,450.00 P211LS Remove Exist Rock Wall, Brick Column & Foundation $2,500.00$2,500.00$1,000.00$1,000.00$2,250.00$2,250.00$1,750.00$1,750.00 P22171SF Remove, Replace and Add to Exist Stack Stone Wall as Needed to Match Exist.$40.00$6,840.00$64.00$10,944.00$50.00$8,550.00$47.00$8,037.00 P231LSHorizontal & Vertical Control$3,500.00$3,500.00$11,000.00$11,000.00$2,500.00$2,500.00$5,000.00$5,000.00 P246SYRemove and Replace Concrete Flume$100.00$600.00$65.00 $390.00$175.00$1,050.00$70.00$420.00 SECTION 3 - PAVING TOTAL BASE BID $227,225.00 $271,789.50 $219,157.00 $283,754.50 SECTION 4 - STORM SEWER ST11EA Combination Double Grate Inlet Per CUP Design Standards $3,000.00$3,000.00$4,200.00$4,200.00$3,500.00$3,500.00$3,400.00$3,400.00 ST234LF 21" Class III RCP w/ Embedment and Recycled Concrete Backfill Per CUP Standards $300.00$10,200.00$80.00$2,720.00$200.00$6,800.00$130.00$4,420.00 ST31LS Const 4' Dia Storm MH w/ Pressure Cover & Frame Over Existing 6'x5' RCB $2,500.00$2,500.00$3,500.00$3,500.00$4,000.00$4,000.00$7,900.00$7,900.00 SECTION 4 - STORM SEWER TOTAL BID $15,700.00 $10,420.00 $14,300.00 $15,720.00 Page 31 of 184 Bid Tabulations for Water, Sanitary Sewer and Alley Improvements - Project No. 49150 August 9, 2011 ALTERNATE ITEM 1. (PVC PIPE C900) BID $116,375.00 $139,925.00 $161,172.50 $210,390.00 $54,225.00 $52,730.00 $79,600.00 $74,277.50 $98,374.00 $103,375.00 $158,750.00 $124,200.00 $227,225.00 $271,789.50 $219,157.00 $283,754.50 $15,700.00 $10,420.00 $14,300.00 $15,720.00 BID TOTALS FOR ALTERNATE ITEM 1. (PVC PIPE C900) $511,899.00 $578,239.50 $632,979.50 $708,342.00 ALTERNATE ITEM 2. (DI PIPE CLASS 51) BID SECTION 1 - SANITARY SEWER TOTAL BASE BID $116,375.00 $139,925.00 $161,172.50 $210,390.00 SECTION 2 - WATER TOTAL BASE BID $54,225.00 $52,730.00 $79,600.00 $74,277.50 ALTERNATE ITEM 2. (DI PIPE CLASS 51) BID $117,250.00 $112,075.00 $197,200.00 $132,120.00 SECTION 3 - PAVING TOTAL BASE BID $227,225.00 $271,789.50 $219,157.00 $283,754.50 SECTION 4 - STORM SEWER TOTAL BASE BID $15,700.00 $10,420.00 $14,300.00 $15,720.00 BID TOTALS FOR ALTERNATE ITEM 2. (DI PIPE CLASS 51) $530,775.00 $586,939.50 $671,429.50 $716,262.00 SECTION 3 - PAVING TOTAL BASE BID SECTION 1 - SANITARY SEWER TOTAL BASE BID SECTION 2 - WATER TOTAL BASE BID ALTERNATE ITEM 1. (PVC PIPE C900) BID SECTION 4 - STORM SEWER TOTAL BASE BID Page 32 of 184 AGENDAMEMO (8/23/2011AGENDA) TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil FROM:GeneR.Smallwood,P.E.;DirectorofPublicWorks SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onaproposalfromDFWCommunicationsforthe installationofamonopoleatthePeekServiceCent er BACKGROUND: Attheir07.19.11meeting,theCityCouncildirecte dstafftomeetwithHPISDconsultantJames Chilestodeterminethefeasibilityofcellularpro vidersco-locatingontheproposedmonopole. CouncilmemberBegertmetwithstaffandMr.Chiles toreviewtheCity'sproposedproject. Followingconsiderablediscussion,Mr.Chilesrecom mendedtheCityproceedwiththeirproject.He wasnotawareofanypotentialcellularinterestin thevicinityofthePeekCenter. NewconstructionnorthoftheFred&HaroldPeekSe rviceCenterrequirestheCity'semergencyradio systemstobemodified.Atthe03.17.09Councilme eting,staffdetailedconstructionof450+ apartmentsproposedforconstructionontheoldSha mburgerLumberYardproperty.That constructionwillblockthelineofsitebetweenan tennaeontheroofofthePeekCenterandthe repeaterontopoftheFondrenelevatedstoragetan k.FollowingdevelopmentbyDFW Communicationsofarevised"pathstudy,"theconsu ltantrecommendedinstallationofa120-foot monopoleatthePeekCenter.Theattachedproposal fromDFWCommunicationsintheamountof $110,600providesthematerials,equipment,andser vicesnecessarytoinstallthemonopole. AnadditionalpieceofequipmentthatDFWCommunica tionsrecommendedwasthepurchaseand installationofaUPS(uninterruptedpowersupply)fortheradioequipmentroominsidetheFondren tank.Theexistingunitfailed,andthecostofre placementis$4500.Thatcostisseparatefromthe monopole,andisnotincludedintheproposal. RECOMMENDATION: StaffrecommendstheCityCouncilapprovethepropo salfromDFWCommunications,directtheCity Managertoexecuteacontractforthemonopole,and authorizethepurchaseoftheUPSforthe FondrenTank. FUNDINGSOURCE: CAPITALPROJECTSFUND AcctNo:44.44.4410 ProjectNo:33500.2300 ATTACHMENTS: DFWCOMMPROPOSAL1 DFWCOMMPROPOSAL2 Page 33 of 184 DFWCOMMPROPOSAL3 Page 34 of 184 DFW Communications City of University Park, Texas DFW Communications 1 of 3 Microwave Relocation Confidential and Proprietary Project Section 1 System Description 1.1 General Understanding The purpose of this section is to provide the City with a description of the new system configuration, system equipment, and other features offered in this proposal. It is understood that the City’s Microwave Path between the Peek Service Center and the Fondren Water tower will be blocked with a new building currently under construction. It is also understood that an additional building is being proposed at Fondren and Central Expressway that will not block the Fondren Water Tower to the City Hall Microwave radio path. A letter from the Architect of this project has been submitted to the city stating this. DFW Communications has done preliminary site studies and has determined two possible options for the city to consider. These options must be further investigated with an on the ground path Study to verify the actual path for clearance of objects that will not be visible thru Mapping software. If any building trees, poles, bridges or other objects are present in the path, they may pose threats of impediment to the path or Fresnel Zones of the Radio signal and could cause blockage or interference. Therefore the City needs to move forward with a phased approach at implementing and selecting the correct option for Tower Size and Reconfiguration of Paths. 1.2 CURRENT SYSTEM The City’s Current Radio System consists of the Following: 1) Main Radio Site This is the Northwest Water Tower. This site consist of (3) each Motorola 800Mhz Quantar Repeaters. They are used for the (3) main channels for the City (Police, Fire, and Local Government). This site is connected to both City Radio Consoles at the Peek Service Center Dispatch and the City Hall Dispatch (Currently under renovation). The transport medium Page 35 of 184 DFW Communications City of University Park, Texas DFW Communications 2 of 3 Microwave Relocation Confidential and Proprietary Project for the control circuitry is via T1 connection on NEC 18 GHz Microwave Radios. Microwave Radio Links are: Northwest – Peek Northwest – City Hall 2) Backup Radio Site This is the Fondren Water Tower. This site is identical to the Main Site and is configured for use as back up due to a radio failure at the Main site. Control of this site is also via the NEC 18 GHz Microwave radio equipment. Microwave Radio Links are: Fondren – Peek Fondren – City Hall 3) Peek Service Center This is the Backup Dispatch Center for the City. It consists of (2) Motorola MCC5500 Consoles and Radio Control Stations for Interoperability and backup channels. This Site is connected to Both Main and Backup Radio Sites and the Main Dispatch via the NEC 18 GHz Microwave Radio System. Microwave Radio Links are: Peek - Fondren Peek - Northwest 4) City Hall This site is the Main Public Safety Dispatch Center and PSAP for University Park. It consist of (3) Motorola MC5500 Consoles and Radio Control Stations for Interoperability and Backup channels. This site is connected to the Main, Backup and Peek Service Center via NEC 18 GHz Microwave radio equipment. Microwave Radio Links are: City Hall – Northwest City Hall - Fondren Page 36 of 184 DFW Communications City of University Park, Texas DFW Communications 3 of 3 Microwave Relocation Confidential and Proprietary Project 1.3 Microwave Impediments 1) Peek to Fondren Microwave Path a. Directly adjacent to and on the North Side of the Peek Service Center a New building is under construction. This building is proposed to reach 65 feet in height. This will block the current Microwave link. b. This will require raising the Microwave link to a new height of at least 120 feet and relocate further south of its current position. c. A Microwave Monopole is being proposed to accommodate the new location. 1.4 Microwave System Enhancements The Microwave Solutions has been evaluated and considered by the City. 1) Path a. Leave all current Paths as is, but relocate the Peek Microwave Radio Dishes to a new Tower that will give a height advantage over the new building. b. This will require Engineering and relicensing the Peek to Fondren and the Peek to Northwest Microwave Path. 1.5 Radio Tower Options Four different Tower Options were offered. The decision is a 120 foot Monopole. The Cellular Type Monopole design consists of a single tubular rolled steel pole. The Choices of Towers are as follows: 1) One Hundred Twenty Foot Monopole Page 37 of 184 DFW Communications City of University Park Microwave Relocation Project Page 1 Section 2 Statement of Work 2.1 General Understanding This Statement of Work (SOW) describes the work to be performed for the Relocation of the Microwave Radio facilities at the Peek Service Center. It delineates responsibilities between DFW Communications and the City of University Park as agreed to by contract. 2.2 Statement of Work DFW Communications will perform the Project Management, Installation, and Optimization Duties for the City of University Park. It is understood that all of the new equipment will be installed in areas specified by the City at the Peek Service Center. 2.2.1 General Tasks 1) Upon receipt of the “Notice to Proceed” and a purchase order, DFW Communications will begin the acquisition of the materials designated on the enclosed equipment list. Once the equipment and Services has been ordered, updated equipment delivery times will be provided to the City’s Project Manager. 2) DFW Communications will appoint a Project Manager who will remain as the single point of contact throughout the project. The PM will coordinate the project kick-off meeting with the City. This initial meeting would include the following discussions along with any other points requested by the City: a) Introduce project team to the City and establish “Point of Contact” for both Motorola and the City. This would include exchanging contact information (email address, phone numbers, etc.). b) Review City responsibilities and timeline of their completion. Page 38 of 184 DFW Communications City of University Park Microwave Relocation Project Page 2 c) Review equipment delivery schedules with City. d) Review installation schedule e) Discuss any on-site requirements of the City. This would include establishing access requirements, onsite contacts, and any special work conditions or safety requirements (hardhats, work location hazards, etc.). 3) All materials will be stored delivered to the Peek Service Center. DFW Communications will be responsible for all shipping and transportation costs as part of this proposal. 4) All project installation will be performed in accordance with recognized industry standards for system installation. Motorola R56 guidelines will be followed where applicable. 5) Prior to beginning system implementation, verify proper operation of the existing system microwave radio system. 2.2.2 Microwave Path Survey and Report 1) System Performance Calculations The surveyed paths had the proper clearance during a survey preformed in 2008. This design of the microwave paths using NEC 18 GHz equipment is based upon these findings. The antenna sizes required to meet 99.999% of reliability are already in place and will be reused. 2) Frequency Coordination DFW Communications will submit the system design to the frequency coordination company to obtain the required frequencies. For the radio equipment that is being repositioned the frequency coordinator will be requested to keep the same frequencies, if possible. This will eliminate the retuning of the equipment. 3) FCC 601 Applications Preparation and Submission Assuming the frequencies are available, DFW Communications will prepare and submit the FCC 601 application for each site. There are a total of three FCC applications required for and four applications for option 2. File numbers of FCC applications will be submitted to DFW Communications. FCC filings located in the FCC’s ULS database may be accessed using the appropriate file numbers. Hard copy is available on request. Page 39 of 184 DFW Communications City of University Park Microwave Relocation Project Page 3 4) FCC Schedule K Once the system is installed and working then DFW Communications will prepare the required Schedule K’s for the FCC. These filings may also be located in the FCC’s ULS database. Hard copy is available on request. 5) FCC Application Fees DFW Communications will pay for all FCC fees at the time the FCC forms are filed. FCC fees are dependent on the situation. There are several rules that dictate what the fees will be. At the time the FCC applications are submitted DFW Communications will know the FCC’s charges. 2.2.3 Tower Installation 1) 120’ Monopole Tower 120' Monopole Tower. Survey and mark the site. Saw cut and remove approximately 6'X6' concrete from existing parking lot. Remove and dispose of NORMAL soil to >14'. Supply and tie rebar cage to manufacturer’s specifications. Install (3) grounding rods exothermically welded to #2 solid tinned conductor, connect to tower base and run (1) #2 solid tinned conductor to the building for customer grounding bar. Fabricate concrete form and jig and place anchor bolts/base section. Pour and vibrate >8.25 yds 3000psi concrete. Finish concrete to top of form. The Foundation is designed for NORMAL SOIL. Pending results of the soil sample a change order for a larger foundation may be required. Install, and level tower. Install Mounts, antennas, and cables. Engineering, Geotechnical soil analysis, permits, rock removal, not included. DFW Communications to supply Labor and expertise, P.E Certified Tower and Foundation Design, Rebar materials, grounding materials, concrete and forms, spoils removal and site clean-up. 120' Monopole Tower, 32"' tapering to 15" at top, Hot- Dipped Galvanized, Dish Mounts, Omni Antenna Mount, Anchor Bolts, Step Bolts and safety climb cable system, P.E. Certified Tower Profile, design and Foundation design based on customer supplied soils report, Grounding Kit Tower Foundation (NORMAL SOIL) 8.25 yds, 28day/3000psi, Rebar ASTM A615 Grade 60 (2) 4"X42" Protection Bollards, Broom Finish Aluminum Cable Tray Extension (Rooftop) Page 40 of 184 DFW Communications City of University Park Microwave Relocation Project Page 4 2.2.4 Microwave Relocation Path 1) Peek to Northwest Link a) Switch Radio Consoles to Fondren Radio site for operations. b) Run New Andrews Heliax Low Loss ½” Diameter Coax from Radio room To New Tower Mounting Location. In preparation of faster deployment. c) Document system performance of Radio Link prior to relocation. Capture RSSI and BER at Both Ends of Radio Link. d) Remove and relocate to Tower the Northwest Water Tower Radio and Antenna Dish. e) Align Microwave Radio Path at Northwest radio Tower and Peek Service Center for New Tower. f) Switch Radio Consoles to the Northwest Radio Site 2) Peek to Fondren Link a) Run New Andrews Heliax Low Loss ½” Diameter Coax from Radio Room To New Tower Mounting Location. In preparation of faster deployment. b) Document system performance of Radio Link prior to relocation. Capture RSSI and BER at Both Ends of Radio Link. c) Remove and relocate to Tower the Fondren Water Tower Radio and Antenna Dish. d) Align Microwave Radio Path at Fondren Radio Tower and Peek Service Center for New Tower. e) Switch Radio Consoles to the Fondren Radio Site and test radios. 2.2.5 NEPA/ SHPO Service Center Site addressed at 4420 Worcola Street in Dallas, Texas. DFW Communications through DFW Communications through Terracon will conduct the NEPA/Section 106 submittal and review process to conform with FCC NEPA Land Use new tower construction in accordance with 47 CFR Section 1.1307 (a) (1) through (8), to determine whether any of the listed FCC special interest items would be significantly affected if a tower structure and antenna and associated equipment control cabinets were constructed at the proposed site location which will include the filing of Form FCC 620 for the site per the National Programmatic Agreement between the FCC and Council on Historic Preservation 2.2.5.1 NEPA/ SHPO-SECTION 106 SCOPE OF SERVICES 2.2.5.1.1 NEPA Evaluation Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulations implementing National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requirements are found in 47 CFR Sections Page 41 of 184 DFW Communications City of University Park Microwave Relocation Project Page 5 1.1301 through 1.1319. As found in 47 CFR Part 1.1307(a), these federal regulations require that nine (9) items potentially impacted by tower construction and licensing must be addressed in a screening process. These items are summarized below in the form of a list of questions, which must be answered and documented to determine whether the action may be excluded from further NEPA processing. 1. Is the facility to be located in an officially designated "Wilderness Area"? 2. Is the facility to be located in an officially designated "Wildlife Preserve"? 3. Will/may the facility affect listed "Threatened or Endangered Species"? 4. Will/may the facility affect properties that are listed or eligible for listing in the "National Register of Historic Places"? 5. Will/may the facility affect "Indian Religious Sites"? 6. Is the facility located in a "Flood Plain"? 7. Will/may construction of the facility involve "Significant Change in Surface Features" (e.g., wetland fill, deforestation or water diversion)? 8. Is the facility an antenna tower and/or supporting structure that is equipped with "High Intensity White Lights" which are to be located in "Residential Neighborhoods", as defined by local zoning laws"? 9. Will the facility result in human exposure to radio-frequency radiation in excess of the applicable safety standards specified in §1.1307(b). DFW Communications through DFW Communications through Terracon’s state- approved archaeologist will conduct a desk top archaeological review of the site. If through the archaeological research process, a Phase I archaeological survey, consisting of visual reconnaissance and shovel tests, is deemed necessary, the client will be advised and provided with a cost estimate to perform these services. 2.2.5.1.2 NEPA Implementation Review (Section 106 -Form 620) Evaluation In addition, DFW Communications through DFW Communications through Terracon will submit site-specific information to specified state and federal agencies to include the Texas State Historic Preservation Office as required. Upon receipt of correspondence from the state and federal agencies, a copy of a final NEPA implementation review will be submitted that present the results of this screening. If "yes" is answered to any of these items, the tower site may require further NEPA assessment prior to construction, such as an architectural survey, or biological survey. To conduct the NEPA implementation review, the following tasks will be performed for the location: x Review of proposed tower construction documents; x Correspondence and/or interviews with necessary federal/state/city agency personnel x Filing Public Notice in the locality of the proposed tower; x Phase I archaeological survey, if required; Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS) filing and corresponding; Page 42 of 184 DFW Communications City of University Park Microwave Relocation Project Page 6 x A Visual effects study, if required. The NEPA implementation review report will contain the results of our findings and our opinions and interpretation of these findings. DFW Communications through DFW Communications through Terracon will provide the appropriate supporting documentation and/or explanation, if available. Please note that with the exception of the Phase I archaeological survey, this scope of work does not include an agency file review or conducting additional services that might be required by a “Yes” response to the NEPA review. At your request, DFW Communications through DFW Communications through Terracon can provide supplemental proposals and cost estimates for any additional services related to a “Yes” response. 2.2.5.1.3 Schedule Services will be initiated upon receipt of the written notice to proceed. Results of the NEPA implementation review will be submitted within approximately 90-120 days from receipt of the written notice to proceed, assuming site access can be gained upon approval. This accounts for a minimum 30 day response time from the agencies contacted regarding possible environmental impacts and 60 days allowance for TCNS. In order to comply with the proposed schedule, the following items are required to be provided by the client at the time of notification to proceed in order to meet the project completion date. x Right of entry to conduct the assessment, including access to building interiors, if any Notification of any restrictions or special requirements (such as confidentiality) regarding accessing the site. x An accurate, legal description and a diagram of the site such as a surveyor’s plat map or scaled architect’s drawing (if such diagrams exist) Copies of TCNS notifications filed with the FCC and any responses received x Copies of relevant correspondence with governmental agencies x Copies of any environmental reports that were previously prepared for the site x Any information relating to known or suspect environmental conditions at the site x Information about environmental liens and activity and use limitations for the site, if any x A signed Agreement for Services evidencing acceptance of this scope of services Consideration of information not received by the issuance date of the report is beyond the scope of these NEPA services. 2.2.5.1.4 Reliance The NEPA report will be prepared for the exclusive use and reliance of DFW Communications (the client). Reliance by any other party (other than a regulatory agency with jurisdiction) is prohibited without the written authorization of DFW Page 43 of 184 DFW Communications City of University Park Microwave Relocation Project Page 7 Communications and DFW Communications through DFW Communications through Terracon. If the client is aware of additional parties that will require reliance on the NEPA report, the names, addresses and relationship of these parties should be provided for DFW Communications through DFW Communications through Terracon approval prior to the time of authorization to proceed. DFW Communications through DFW Communications through Terracon will grant reliance on the Report to those approved parties upon receipt of a fully executed Reliance Agreement (available upon request). If, in the future, the client and DFW Communications through DFW Communications through Terracon consent to reliance on the Reports by a third party, DFW Communications through DFW Communications through Terracon will grant reliance upon receipt of a fully executed Reliance Agreement and receipt of an additional fee of $250.00 per relying party. Reliance on the Report by the client and all authorized parties will be subject to the terms, conditions and limitations stated in the Agreement (and sections of this proposal incorporated therein), the Reliance Agreement, and Reports. 2.2.5.1.5 Scope and Report Limitations The findings and conclusions presented in the final reports will be based on the site’s current utilization and the information collected as discussed in this proposal. Please note that we do not warrant database or third party information (such as interviewees) or regulatory agency information used in the compilation of reports. NEPA reviews, such as those proposed for these sites, are of limited scope, are noninvasive and cannot eliminate the potential that environmental consequences are present beyond what is identified by the limited scope of this NEPA review. In conducting the limited scope of services described herein, certain sources of information and public records will not be reviewed. It should be recognized that environmental concerns may be documented in public records that are not reviewed. This NEPA review does not include subsurface or other invasive assessments, business environmental risk evaluations or other services not particularly identified and discussed herein. No NEPA review can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for environmental consequences. The limitations herein must be considered when the user of this report formulates opinions as to risks associated with the proposed sites. No warranties, express or implied, are intended or made. Page 44 of 184 DFW Communications City of University Park Microwave Relocation Project Page 8 NEPA Review (Tower site located in Dallas, Texas) * $ 3,100.00 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service biological review (if required) Project Specific Tribal review/consultation fees (if required) Project Specific Legal Notice/Public Notification (required) Cost plus 25% each Follow Up Correspondence/Consultation with FCC at Clients Request ** Project Specific Phase I Archaeological Survey (if required)*** Cost plus 25% each Additional Filings, Mitigation or Surveys (if required) Project Specific SUBTOTAL $ 3,100.00 LUMP SUM TOTAL * $ 3,100.00 * Pricing is based upon the assumption of a one-time mobilization. ** Not included in the scope of services per the client’s direction. *** Costs associated with performance of a Phase I Archaeological Survey will vary depending on the site. A typical price for a stand-alone survey for one site is typically in the $2,000 to $3,000 range. 2.2.5 Geotechnical Services 2.2.5.1 Field and Laboratory Services In the boring cohesive soils will be sampled using thin walled tubes. Cohesionless soils will be sampled during the performance of the standard penetration test. Sampling will be continuous to ten feet and intermittently thereafter at a maximum interval of five feet. All samples will be extruded, logged, sealed, and packaged in the field to maintain their moisture content and reduce disturbance during transportation to the laboratory. The load carrying capacity of the bedrock will be evaluated in the field using the Texas Department of Transportation Cone Penetration Test. Following the completion of drilling, the pavement surface will be patched with secrete if necessary. DFW Communications through Terracon will contact DigTESS, the one call locator service, to avoid underground utilities. We will not be responsible for damage resulting from encountering utilities of which we are not made aware of. An experienced geotechnical engineer will review the boring logs and samples. Laboratory tests will be conducted on representative samples to evaluate the pertinent engineering properties of the materials encountered. Afterberg limits will be preformed to classify the clay soils and as an indication of their volume change potential. In-situ moisture contents will be preformed to evaluate the consistency of the soils. Unconfined compression tests may be used to evaluate the strength of the cohesive soils. Samples will be discarded 30 days after the geotechnical report is issued. 2.2.5.2 Geotechnical Engineering Report The results of the field an laboratory studies will be combined into an engineering Page 45 of 184 DFW Communications City of University Park Microwave Relocation Project Page 9 report presenting DFW Communications through Terracon’s analysis, comments and recommendations on geotechnical considerations pertinent to the design of the communications monopole. These wil include the following: x Boring log, boring location diagram, groundwater information, and laboratory data. x Appropriate foundation types, depths, and design parameters with alternatives, if necessary. x The presence of groundwater along with its effect on construction x Site class per Table 1613.5.2 of the 2006 IBC 2.3 City of University Park’s Responsibilities This section discusses the responsibilities and tasks expected of the City of University Park. Each of these items will be addressed in the Detailed Design Review meeting held at the time of signing the contract. 1. Provide a designated project manager for system implementation and work with DFW Communications in scheduling all meetings and site visits. 2. Supply primary commercial power, wiring, and cable terminations. 3. Obtain all FCC, FAA, zoning, site access, and other permits (including, but not limited to, easements, impact studies, planning commission approval, variances, etc) necessary for this project and any other agreements required to gain use of sites except where noted in SOW that DFW is providing FCC coordination efforts for new Microwave links. 4. Post the RF license for radio sites prior to testing. 5. Secure the right to use new site location. 6. Provide Building and Civil Drawings for proposed Tower Site. 7. Provide Dig Test Services of proposed site to insure there are not any underground utilities or plumbing structures that could be damaged or impede the construction of tower and foundation. 8. Take responsibility for all Civil Engineering of Building to accommodate Cable tray extension and Ice Bridge to the new Radio tower. 9. Provide all authorizations to perform the installation services. 10. Obtain and provide all approvals, permits, and agreements as required at all sites and locations. 11. Provide site access and escort as required, in a timely manner during normal work hours. Page 46 of 184 DFW Communications City of University Park Microwave Relocation Project Page 10 12. Provide adequate space for equipment to be installed. 13. Provide primary electrical power at the site. 14. Provide all roof penetrations required by the project. 15. Provide connectivity and connections at the equipment locations. 16. Sign “Installation Completion Form” upon satisfactory completion of project. 17. Provide all buildings, equipment shelters, and towers required for system installation 18. Insure communications sites meet space, grounding, power, and connectivity requirements for the installation of all equipment. 19. Customer will provide a dedicated delivery point, such as a warehouse, for receipt, inventory and storage of equipment prior to delivery to the site(s). 2.4 Assumptions DFW Communications has developed a comprehensive engineered solution contained within this proposal with the best intentions of satisfying the needs of University Park. Certain assumptions were made in order for DFW Communications to design this system. The following is a list of site requirements and design assumptions for the system. 1. All existing sites or equipment locations will have sufficient space available for the system described as required/specified by R56. 2. All existing sites or equipment locations will have adequate electrical power in the proper phase and voltage and site grounding to support the requirements of the system described. 3. Any site/location upgrades or modifications are the responsibility of the customer. 4. Approved local, State, Federal third party permits as may be required for the installation and operation of the proposed equipment are the responsibility of University Park. 5. Any required system interconnections not specifically outlined here will be provided by University Park. These may include dedicated phone circuits, microwave links, Ethernet or other types of connectivity. 6. No coverage guarantee is included in this proposal. 7. DFW Communications is not responsible for interference caused or received by the DFW Communications provided equipment. Should the University Park’s system experience interference, DFW Communications can be contracted to investigate the source and recommend solutions to mitigate the issue. 8. The Path study preformed in 2008 is still valid. Page 47 of 184 DFW Communications City of University Park Microwave Relocation Project Page 11 2.5 Site Preparation DFW Communications will begin work at a site only after mutual agreement by the City of University Park and DFW Communications that the site is deemed ready. At a minimum, Site Ready requires a site to have adequate room in an existing building or shelter to accommodate the equipment to be installed, and electrical service and internal distribution in place. In addition, network testing must have been satisfactorily completed. Sites are required to meet or exceed the requirements as defined in the Motorola document “Fixed Network Equipment Installations” (“R56 Standard”). Site requirements must be met before DFW Communications will begin installation of system equipment. The City of University Park will be responsible for any project delay costs if sites do not meet the site ready condition within the time required by the project schedule. 2.5.1 Site Access  Requirement – the City of University Park shall provide site access for scheduled site walks, installation, optimization, system troubleshooting and completion of ATP. the City of University Park shall use its best efforts to provide site access including transportation to sites that are not accessible by regular four-wheel drive vehicles. The City of University Park shall be responsible for coordinating and scheduling with the DFW Communications Project Manager for access to sites not directly controlled by the City of University Park. 2.6 Implementation Implementation of the project will proceed according to the mutually agreed upon Statement of Work presented in this section. DFW Communications phased approach to implementation includes factory staging, site development, infrastructure and subscriber unit installation, optimization and programming, and testing of the communications network. Installation and optimization of system equipment  Perform Installation of DFW Communications Supplied Equipment  DFW Communications will install the equipment as defined by the Equipment List and this statement of work.  Perform On-Site Optimization and Test of DFW Communications Supplied Equipment Page 48 of 184 DFW Communications City of University Park Microwave Relocation Project Page 12  DFW Communications will verify correct operation of all supplied equipment as the equipment is installed. After the equipment has been correctly installed, DFW Communication’s Field Engineering Team will optimize the entire system. 2.7 System Acceptance The ATP section of this proposal details the procedures to confirm that the system provided by DFW Communications is complete and meets the acceptance test criteria. Each segment will be tested independently using detailed check sheets to be provided by DFW Communications, as appropriate, and approved by the City of University Park prior to commencement of acceptance testing. If deficiencies are found during the testing, both the deficiencies and resolutions to the deficiencies shall be agreed upon and documented. If the documented deficiencies do not prevent productive operational use of the system, then the test will be deemed to have been completed. DFW Communications will, however, remain responsible for the resolution of the documented deficiencies. DFW Communications must review any system testing that the City of University Park wants performed that is not specified in the ATP section of this proposal for feasibility and acceptability. Any additional tests will represent a change in the project’s scope. 2.7.1 Microwave Acceptance Testing 1) Bit Error Rate Testing of T1 a. Acceptance testing will consist of documenting for customer the Bit error Rate of all T1 circuits with alarm free operation over a 24 hour period. 2) Testing of Circuit Loop Protection Device a. After all Microwave radio sites are in full operation the system can loose anyone site and fully recover the microwave path from the Working to the Protected path or the reverse thereof. This will be demonstrated by powering off selected Microwave radios to simulate path losses. 2.7.2 Radio Tower Acceptance 1) Tower Engineering a. A Certified P.E. Stamp will be provided for the Tower upon completion. b. Tower will be built to supplied specification and be satisfactory in appearance and structural integrity and workmanship by professional tower company. Page 49 of 184 DFW Communications City of University Park Microwave Relocation Project Page 13 c. All material waste and debris will be removed from city property. 2.8 System Documentation DFW Communications provides documentation of the system configurations, and system testing. Documentation is created and updated during the project. 2.8.1 Design Documentation DFW Communications will create or update the following documents during the design phase:  Equipment list  System description  Acceptance test procedures  Programming parameters 2.8.2 Equipment Manual  DFW Communications will provide equipment manuals covering both standard and optional features. The content of these manuals is standardized and may not be specific to the City of University Park.  Some equipment manuals are only available in Hard Copy. Some equipment manuals are available electronically. We do not guarantee which format you will receive for each manual. Page 50 of 184 DFW Communications City of University Park DFW Communications 1 of 4 Microwave Relocation Confidential and Proprietary Project Section 3 System Implementation Price Proposal 3.1 Overview of System Pricing The following tables show the pricing for the equipment and services offered in this proposal. Installation and optimization includes all of the services described in the Statement of Work along with the acceptance testing procedures. Tower Cost 120’ Monopole $84,000.00 Field Service Engineering Optimization of 2 New Paths $12,900.00 New Coax and Connectors $2,550.00 Project Management Services $4,200.00 Geotechnical Services $3,850.00 Estimated NEPA / SHPO $3,100.00 Not Including: • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service biological review (if required) • Tribal review/consultation fees (if required) • Legal Notice/Public Notification (required) • Follow Up Correspondence/Consultation with FCC at Clients Request • Phase I Archaeological Survey (if required) • Additional Filings, Mitigation or Surveys (if required) Total $110,600.00 Proposal Pricing is subject to Outcome of Path Engineering Results and Assumptions of Normal Soil at Tower Location. Page 51 of 184 DFW Communications City of University Park DFW Communications 2 of 4 Microwave Relocation Confidential and Proprietary Project 3.2 Clarifications 1) This price proposal is valid for 90 days 2) All work will be performed during normal working hours (Monday through Friday, 8AM to 4:30PM). 3) All manufacturer warranties apply. The warranty period shall begin once the City has begun beneficial use of any part of the system not to exceed 90 days beyond the date of delivery. 4) Installation charges include full system installation and optimization, acceptance testing, training. 5) Prior to execution of a contract between the City and DFW Communications and after a letter of intent has been received from the City, a meeting will be held to thoroughly discuss this proposal and provide all of the detailed information about the new system offered. This meeting is referred to as the Detailed Design Review. 6) Any additional work required to complete this project not addressed in this proposal will be addressed utilizing a Change Order Request Form shown below. Page 52 of 184 DFW Communications City of University Park DFW Communications 3 of 4 Microwave Relocation Confidential and Proprietary Project Change Order Request Form Change Order Request No. Requester: Title Phone No. Department Description of Request: Equipment Required: SOW Modification Time Line Modification: Additional Services Required: Justification: Budgetary Dollar Value: Equipment: Services: Total: Payment Terms: Other Terms: Unless amended above, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. Approved: City of University Park Project Manager Date DFW Communications, Inc. Project Manager Date DFW Communications, Inc. Engineer Date DFW Communications, Inc. Account Manager Date Page 53 of 184 DFW Communications City of University Park DFW Communications 4 of 4 Microwave Relocation Confidential and Proprietary Project 3.3 Terms and Conditions 1) Service agreement on equipment can be written to cover all infrastructure on a 24 x 7 basis. If the City so chooses after the warranty period has expired, a maintenance agreement could be developed to cover malfunctions, electronic components, and failure. Negligence, abuse and Acts of God are not covered under a service agreement. 2) Manufacturers’ standard equipment warranty (which will be furnished upon request) applies to all ordered equipment. 3) DFW Communications, Inc. disclaims all other warranties with respect to the ordered products express or implied including the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. 4) Warranty Service is provided Monday through Friday, 8AM to 4:30PM. After hours warranty service is available, pricing for this service can be discussed during the detailed design review meeting. 5) Unless otherwise stated, payment will be due within thirty days after invoice. What the Warranty Does Not Cover Defects or damage resulting from use of the Product in other than its normal and customary manner. After hours service Defects or damage from misuse, accidents, water, lightning, or neglect Defects or damage from improper testing, operation, maintenance, installation, alteration, modification, or adjustment. Breakage or damage to antennas unless caused directly by defects in material workmanship. Products, which have had the serial number removed or made illegible. Scratches or other cosmetic damage to Product surfaces that does not affect the operation of the Product. A Product subjected to unauthorized Product modifications, disassemblies or repairs. Normal and customary wear and tear. Page 54 of 184 AGENDAMEMO (8/23/2011AGENDA) TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil FROM:GeneR.Smallwood,P.E.;DirectorofPublicWorks SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onanagreementtosupporttheannualPublicWorks programattheNorthCentralTexasCouncilofGover nments(NCTCOG) BACKGROUND: MembercitiesoftheNorthCentralTexasCouncilof Governmentsparticipateinandfundannual workprograms.UniversityParkhasbeenapartner inthePublicWorksprogramforanumberof years.Basedonpopulation,theCity'sproposedsh areforthe2012programis$3,790.Thecollective citiesreceivebenefitsonsuchissuesas: *iSWMprogram *SustainablePublicRights-of-way *PublicWorksConstructionStandards(specificat ions) *Hydrologic/floodingtechnicalsupport *Generalpublicworkssupport Detailsofeachoftheseissuesareprovidedinthe attachments. RECOMMENDATION: StaffrecommendsCityCouncilapprovaloftheagree menttosupporttheNCTCOGPublicWorks program. FUNDINGSOURCE: StormwaterUtilityBudget AcctNo02.23.7150$3,750 ATTACHMENTS: NCTCOGAuthorizationLetter Page 55 of 184 North CentralTexas Council Of Governments Gene Smallwood Director of Public Works, City of University Park DATE: July 28,20II FROM: John Promlse, P.E. Director of Environment and Development SUBJECT: FiscalYear 201-2 Regional Public Works Program Thankyouforyourcontinuedinterestinandsupportof regionalcooperationforpublicworks. TheFiscalYear(FY) 2012 RegionalPublicWorksProgramwasunanimouslyapprovedbyNCTCOG'sPublicWorksCouncil. Attachedisanoverviewofthe work program. We will continue our integrated Storm Water Management (iSWM) Program for Construction and Development andSustainablePublicdightsof Way(SPROW) activitiesinthecomingfiscal year. WewillalsobegineffortstoupAate*e Public Works Construction Standa rds. With the recent release of the new |SWM documents, we are initiating an effort to inform and assist local governments in adoptingandimplementingthemanuals. Inaddition,acurriculumisbeingdevelopedtooffer|SWMtrainingclassestolocal government staff and private consultants, In FY 2012, the SPROW Committee will maintain the "Roadmap to a Sustainable Public Right of Way" interactive website launched in 20L0 and pursue additional outreach, education, and research activitiesto furtherthe utilization ofthe resource. The Public Works Council established the Public Works Construction Standards Working Group to oversee an effort to determine proposed changes and to develop a proposal, including a cost estimate, for updating the standards over a two-year oeriod. Various other activities will include administrative and technical assistance, continued public education, cooperative meetings, overall coordination throughout the region, and the 2012 Public Works Roundup. After assessing the funding needed to conduct the activities identified for next year and considering the region's current economic conditions, the Public Works Council determined that the cost share amounts will remain the same as in FY 2011. The cost share remains unchanged since FY 2005. Please sign and return the attached FY 20L2 Commitment Form indicating your jurisdiction's participation and support of these important regional initiatives. Thankyouforyourconsiderationofthisfundingrequestandyourcontinuedsupport. lfyouhaveanyquestions,pleasecontact me by phone at 817.695,9211, or by email at ioromise@nctcos.ors. You may also contact Jack Tidwell of my staff at 8L7 .695.9220, or by ema i I at itidwel l@ nctcos.ors. JP lez Attachments 616 Six Flags Drive, Cenierpoint Two P. O. Box 5888, Arlington, Texas 76005-5888 (817) 640-3300 FAX:817-64O-7806 @ recycled paper www.nctcog.org TO: Page 56 of 184 FY 2012 October 1,2011 to September 30,2012 FY 2012 Gomponents o iSWM Program . Sustainable Public Rights of Way . Public Works Construction Standards . Hydrologic/Flooding Technical Assistance . General Public Works Support |SWM Proqram lmplementation & Traininq o Assist local governments in adopting |SWM o Create educational forums and materials for local government staff and officials o Expand |SWM Tools to incorporate brochures and design examples for local government staff as well as other design professionals . Offer formal |SWM training classes o Develop template presentations for all levels of government staff and officials that can be given by NCTCOG or local government staff o Develop and offer |SWM training classes o Track emerging federal and state stormwater requirements for addressing construction and post-construction Sustainable Public Riqhts of Wav . Continue Sustainable Public Rights of Way (SPROW Committee as a quarterly Task Force o Maintain online resource center . Within available resources, pursue: o Connectivigfacilitation o Educational series o Economic implications research o Examine expansion into new topics Public Works Construction Standards Update o Create a subcommittee to lead construction standards update effort . ldentify priority topics for changes to Standards through subcommittee . Develop proposal, including costs, to update Standards over a two year period May 2011 Page 57 of 184 Hvdrologic/Floodinq Technical Assistance . Assist FEMA RiskMAP update activities . FEMA CTP (Cooperative Technical Partner) activities including outreach, training and general support of FEMA NFIP and mapping activities General Public Works Support o Administratively support committees, including Public Works Council and subcommittees . 13th Annual Public Works Roundup in Spring 2012 o TechnicalAssistance . Maintain web sites - |SWM, SPROW, PW Standards . Make Presentations to various groups on |SWM, Sustainable Public Rights of Way, Public Works Standards, etc. The local cost share will be the same as in FY 2011 integrated Storm Water Management (|SWMrM) www.iswm.nctcoo.orq Regional Storm Water Program www.dfirustormwate r. co m For more information contact NCTCOG's Dept of E&D 817.695.9220 voice 817.695.9191 fax Approved by the Public Works Council on May 11,2011 May 2Q11 Page 58 of 184 Authorizing Official: Name Local Government Title or Position Signature Gene Smallwood City of University Park Director of Public Works _ | hereby indicate my entity's Program. Please bill me after _ | hereby indicate my entity will commitment to participate in the FY2012 October 1,2011 for the amount of $3790. not participate in the Regional Public Works Regional Public Works Program. Primary Contact: (please print) Name Local Government Title or Position Address Phone Email Fax Please mail this form to.Liz Zecckine Department of Environment & Development North Central Texas Council of Governments P. O. Box 5888 Arlington, TX 76005-5888 or fax to the attention of Liz Zecckine at 817,695.9191 Questions? Jack Tidwell at 817 .695.9220, jtidwell@nctcog.org Page 59 of 184 AGENDAMEMO (8/23/2011AGENDA) TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil FROM:KenIrvin,Sr.NetworkAdministrator SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onapprovalofanupgradetotheCity'semailsyste mfrom Exchange2003toExchange2010 BACKGROUND: TheCity'sexistingExchange2003serverhardwarew asinstalledinNovemberof2005.AstheCity constantlyreliesmoreonelectroniccommunication,ouremailenvironmentbecomesincreasingly criticaltoemployeeproductivity.Withthesefact orsinmind,ithasbecomenecessarytoreplacethe existingserverhardwareandupdateouremailserve rsoftwaretothelatestavailableversion. Inourchargetoprovidesecurityofdataforourc itizensandemployees,wehavealsofoundit necessarytoaddemailencryptioncapabilitiestot hesystem.Thiswillallowthesendingemployee theabilitytoselectasecuremethodofdeliveryf ortheCity'smoresensitivedocuments.Doingso willbringusintocompliancewithrequirementsset forthbytheFBIandHIPPA.Theimplementation ofthisfeaturewillbeviatheadditionofalicen setoourexistingIronportemailsecurityandSPAM filteringappliance. Finally,wehavefounditnecessarytoprovideempl oyeeswithbettermethodstoscheduleconference roomsanddosoinatightlyintegratedmanner.Th eCrestronRoomviewproductprovidesemployees withthecapabilitytoseetheavailabilityofconf erenceroomresourcesatCityfacilities,schedule theseresources,andlaterviewthedailyschedule forconferenceroomsatthePeekServiceCenter andCityHall.Thiswillgreatlyimprovetheprodu ctivityofdepartmentemployeesandourabilityto routeoutsidepartiestotheappropriatemeetinglo cations. RECOMMENDATION: StaffreccomendsthattheCityCouncilapprovethe purchaseofthefollowingitemsforasumof $60,953.72comprisedofthefollowingcomponents: WindowsServer2008andExchange2010Licensing:$2 3,934.31 DellServerHardware:$14,597.91 ProfessionalServices:$7,150.00 IronportEmailEncryption:$3,631.50 CrestronRoomViewSoftwareandInstallation:$11,64 0.00 FUNDINGSOURCE: CapitalProjectnumber13600hasbeenapprovedbyt heCapitalProjectsCommitteefortheFiscal Year2011. Page 60 of 184 ATTACHMENTS: SoftwareQuote ProfessionalServicesQuote EmailEncryptionQuote RoomViewQuote HardwareQuotes Page 61 of 184 !∀#∃%& &∋%%∋!∀()∗+∗,−)−− !∀#∃%& &∋%%∋!.∀()∗+∗,−)−− (/−0001/−0 ∀2! −+∗+0∀!#∃ #∀% &∋ (∀#∀% (∀ 342!!%& /+!352∋ ∀6.∋7.∗+,0− ∀20/)000 ∀3843386 8832∀89664 88323382:8∀:3 &;∋3. )∗+,,∗− ./−!0 !.1 2 !.+1 ∀,1 8 <∃&!∀∋∀ !& ∋8=+8 &33 )#2#452 ! ∀ # #∃%& ∋()∋ ∗+,−./01,/2−34.++∗15+.6 &6 742#452 ! ∀ # #∃%& ∋()∋ ∗+,−./01,/2−34.++∗15+.6 6 )#2#4528 ! ∀ # #∃%& ∋()∋ ∗+,−./01,/2−34.++∗15+.6 − Page 62 of 184 (∀#∀% &∋ = = &63 74#4528 ! ∀ # #∃%& ∋()∋ ∗+,−./01,/2−34.++∗15+.6 4 ! 74##4528 )2 ! ∀ # #∃%& ∋()∋ ∗+,−./01,/2−34.++∗15+.6 ∀%&9∋&6∃& :∃ &9∋&6∃& 8(85#0 !668<∃ >334+−)+1−+ 3834????????????????????????????????????? ∋3≅84=∀2?????????????????????????????????????Α626Β ∋3≅8!3?????????????????????????????????????&??????????????? ∀!2 !,,∀!/ 1;∀!!.∗∗.%∀!− ∀%,,<!, !∀..−∃∀, !∗!! ∀∗%∗∀!− ∀%,,9,∃∃−9 =1∀. ,!∗−!− ∀%,,> ,19 ∀2 6∃6∋∃?&6 !≅!− ∃, ?&6:0 6∃?∃?Α:0 + Page 63 of 184 (∀#∀% &∋ = = !3∀83.!8!23 >1,11))/,0+∃ 342!Α!Β638428 !3∀2838∀2!=!23 ∀622824266 !3Χ3∋22 ! 3228.2 8Α;,−+Β.83.8683 6388462636:6342 :8∀6236:3 23 ∆3866 8638 8 6∆3.3348:! 332:3284663:3 2,, 6223 ∀Ε ∀%Β,!Χ∗!///∃!∃!− ∃,!∗∗!∀!!∀, !!%−∗∀!∀ !/,,/ , ,! !. !/,,! −+∃ Page 64 of 184 DELL QUOTATION QUOTE #: 594501441 Customer #: 28037257 Contract #: 48ABO CustomerAgreement #: DIR-SDD-890-TX Quote Date: 8/17/11 Date: 8/17/11 9:52:04 AM Customer Name: CITY OF UNIV PARK TOTAL QUOTE AMOUNT: $8,602.94 Product Subtotal: $8,602.94 Tax: $0.00 Shipping & Handling: $0.00 Shipping Method: Ground Total Number of System Groups: 1 GROUP: 1 QUANTITY: 1 SYSTEM PRICE: $8,602.94 GROUP TOTAL: $8,602.94 Base Unit: PE R710 with Chassis for Up to 8, 2.5-Inch Hard Drives (224-8461) Processor: PowerEdge R710 Shipping (330-4124) Memory: 24GB Memory (6x4GB), 1333MHz Dual Ranked LV RDIMMs for 2 Procs, Optimized (317-7334) Monitor: Embedded Broadcom, GB Ethernet NICS with TOE (430-1764) Monitor: Embedded Broadcom, GB Ethernet NICS with TOE and ISCSI Offload Enabled (430-2970) Video Card: Intel Xeon X5660, 2.8Ghz, 12M Cache,Turbo, HT, 1333MHz Max Mem (317-4108) Video Memory: PowerEdge R710 Heat Sinks for 2 Processors (317-1213) Video Memory: Intel Xeon X5660, 2.8Ghz, 12M Cache,Turbo, HT, 1333MHz Max Mem (317-4120) Hard Drive: HD Multi-Select (341-4158) Hard Drive Controller: PERC H700 Integrated RAID Controller, 512MB NV Cache, x8 (342-1146) Floppy Disk Drive: Power Saving BIOS Setting (330-3491) Floppy Disk Drive: Power Cord, C13 to C14, PDU Style, 12 Amps, 2 meter, Qty 1 (330-3151) Operating System: No Operating System (420-6320) Mouse: 300GB 10K RPM Serial-Attach SCSI 6Gbps 2.5in Hotplug Hard Drive (342-0429) - Quantity 6 Mouse: 146GB 15K RPM Serial-Attach SCSI 6Gbps 2.5in Hotplug Hard Drive (342-0427) - Quantity 2 NIC: Intel Gigabit ET NIC,Dual Port, Copper, PCIe-4 (430-0651) Modem: VFlash, 8GB SD Card for iDRAC6 Enterprise (342-1413) Modem: iDRAC6 Enterprise (467-8648) CD-ROM or DVD-ROM Drive: DVD ROM, SATA, INTERNAL (313-9092) Sound Card: Bezel (313-7517) Speakers: Riser with 2 PCIe x8 + 2 PCIe x4 Slot (320-7886) Documentation Diskette: Electronic System Documentation and OpenManage DVD Kit (330-3485) Feature RAID 1/RAID 10 for H700 or PERC 6/i Controllers (341-8705) Feature ReadyRails Sliding Rails With CableManagement Arm (330-3477) Service: Thank you choosing Dell ProSupport. For tech support, visit http://support.dell.com/ProSupport or call 1-800-9 (989-3439) Service: Non-Mission Critical: 4-Hour 7x24 On-site Service After Problem Diagnosis, 3 Year Extended (989-5293) Service: ProSupport : 7x24 HW / SW Tech Support and Assistance , 4 Year (989-5493) Service: Non-Mission Critical: 4-Hour 7x24 On-site Service After Problem Diagnosis, Initial Year (993- Page 1 of 2 8/17/2011file://C:\Documents and Settings\kirvin\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.O... Page 65 of 184 Please review this quote carefully. If complete and accurate, you may place your order online at www.dell.com/qto (use quote number above). POs and payments should be made to Dell Marketing L.P. If you do not have a separate agreement with Dell that applies to your order, please refer to www.dell.com/terms as follows: If purchasing for your internal use, your order will be subject to Dell's Terms and Conditions of Sale-Direct including Dell's U.S. Return Policy, at www.dell.com/returnpolicy#total. If purchasing for resale, your order will be subject to Dell's Terms and Condition of Sale for Persons or Entities Purchasing to Resell, and other terms of Dell's PartnerDirect program at www.dell.com/partner. If your order includes services, visit www.dell.com/servicecontracts for service descriptions and terms. Quote information is valid for U.S. customers and U.S. addresses only, and is subject to change. Sales tax on products shipped is based on "Ship To" address, and for downloads is based on "Bill To" address. Please indicate any tax-exempt status on your PO, and fax your exemption certificate, with seller listed as Dell Marketing L.P, to Dell's Tax Department at 800-433-9023. Please include your Customer Number. For certain products shipped to end-users in California, a State Environmental Fee will be applied. For Asset Recovery/Recycling Services, visit www.dell.com/assetrecovery. 2160) Service: Dell Hardware Limited Warranty Plus On Site Service Initial Year (993-8447) Service: Dell Hardware Limited Warranty Extended Year (993-8458) Installation: On-Site Installation Declined (900-9997) Support: Proactive Maintenance Service Declined (926-2979) Misc: High Output Power Supply Redundant, 870W (330-3475) Misc: No Power Cord (310-9057) SALES REP: Eddie Reyes PHONE: 1-866-537-0706 Email Address: eduardo_reyes@dell.com Phone Ext: 5139046 Page 2 of 2 8/17/2011file://C:\Documents and Settings\kirvin\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.O... Page 66 of 184 DELL QUOTATION QUOTE #: 594503225 Customer #: 28037257 Contract #: 48ABO CustomerAgreement #: DIR-SDD-890-TX Quote Date: 8/17/11 Date: 8/17/11 9:52:05 AM Customer Name: CITY OF UNIV PARK TOTAL QUOTE AMOUNT: $5,994.97 Product Subtotal: $5,994.97 Tax: $0.00 Shipping & Handling: $0.00 Shipping Method: Ground Total Number of System Groups: 1 GROUP: 1 QUANTITY: 1 SYSTEM PRICE: $5,994.97 GROUP TOTAL: $5,994.97 Base Unit: PowerEdge R410 Chassis w/ up to 4 Hot-Plug Hard Drives,LCD diagnostics (224-8690) Processor: Shipping Material,PowerEdge R410 (330-4137) Memory: 8GB Memory (4x2GB), 1333MHz Single Rank LV RDIMMs for 2 Processors, Advanced ECC (317- 5884) Video Card: Intel XeonE5620 2.4Ghz, 12M Cache,Turbo, HT, 1066MHz Max Mem (317-4112) Video Memory: PowerEdge R410 Heat Sync for 2Processors (317-1276) Video Memory: Intel Xeon E5620 2.4Ghz, 12M Cache,Turbo, HT, 1066MHz Max Mem (317-4124) Hard Drive: HD Multi-Select (341-4158) Hard Drive Controller: PERC H700 Adapter, RAID Controller NVDIMM 1GB Cache (342-1485) Hard Drive Controller: PERC H700 Cable for Hot Plug Chassis (342-2519) Operating System: Windows Server 2008 R2, Standard Edition, Includes 5 CALS (421-1622) Modem: iDRAC6 Enterprise (313-7837) CD-ROM or DVD-ROM Drive: Optical Cable R410 (313-7834) CD-ROM or DVD-ROM Drive: DVD ROM, SATA, INTERNAL (313-9126) Sound Card: Bezel (313-7839) Documentation Diskette: Electronic System Documentation and OpenManage DVD Kit (330-4148) Feature RAID 5 for PERC6i/H700 Controllers (342-2709) Feature ReadyRails Sliding Rails with CableManagement Arm (330-4140) Service: Dell Hardware Limited Warranty Plus On Site Service Initial Year (994-6627) Service: Dell Hardware Limited Warranty Plus On Site Service Extended Year (994-6058) Service: Pro Support : Next Business Day Onsite Service After Problem Diagnosis, 3 Year Extended (990- 3913) Service: Pro Support : Next Business Day Onsite Service After Problem Diagnosis, Initial Year (994-2830) Service: ProSupport : 7x24 HW / SW Tech Support and Assistance , 4 Year (990-3953) Service: Thank you choosing Dell ProSupport. For tech support, visit http://support.dell.com/ProSupport or call 1-800-9 (989-3439) Extended Service: Dell Proactive Systems Management - visit www.dell.com/Proactive to configure your service (909-0269) Installation: On-Site Installation Declined (900-9997) Misc: Power Supply, Redundant, 500W (330-4141) Misc: Microsoft SQL Server 2008R2 Standard,OEM, Includes 5 CALs, NFI, With Media (421-3600) Page 1 of 2 8/17/2011file://C:\Documents and Settings\kirvin\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.O... Page 67 of 184 Please review this quote carefully. If complete and accurate, you may place your order online at www.dell.com/qto (use quote number above). POs and payments should be made to Dell Marketing L.P. If you do not have a separate agreement with Dell that applies to your order, please refer to www.dell.com/terms as follows: If purchasing for your internal use, your order will be subject to Dell's Terms and Conditions of Sale-Direct including Dell's U.S. Return Policy, at www.dell.com/returnpolicy#total. If purchasing for resale, your order will be subject to Dell's Terms and Condition of Sale for Persons or Entities Purchasing to Resell, and other terms of Dell's PartnerDirect program at www.dell.com/partner. If your order includes services, visit www.dell.com/servicecontracts for service descriptions and terms. Quote information is valid for U.S. customers and U.S. addresses only, and is subject to change. Sales tax on products shipped is based on "Ship To" address, and for downloads is based on "Bill To" address. Please indicate any tax-exempt status on your PO, and fax your exemption certificate, with seller listed as Dell Marketing L.P, to Dell's Tax Department at 800-433-9023. Please include your Customer Number. For certain products shipped to end-users in California, a State Environmental Fee will be applied. For Asset Recovery/Recycling Services, visit www.dell.com/assetrecovery. Misc: Power Cord, C13 to C14, PDU Style, 12 Amps, 2 meter, Qty 1 (330-3151) Misc: Power Cord, C13 to C14, PDU Style, 12 Amps, 2 meter, Qty 1 (330-3151) Misc: Windows Server 2008SP2,Standard Edition, x86/x64, Downgrade Media (421-6266) Misc: 146GB 15K RPM Serial-Attach SCSI 3Gbps 3.5in Hotplug Hard Drive (341-8718) Misc: 146GB 15K RPM Serial-Attach SCSI 3Gbps 3.5in Hotplug Hard Drive (341-8718) Misc: 146GB 15K RPM Serial-Attach SCSI 3Gbps 3.5in Hotplug Hard Drive (341-8718) USB Server Interface Pod, includes 2x CAT 5 Cables (310-9960) SALES REP: Eddie Reyes PHONE: 1-866-537-0706 Email Address: eduardo_reyes@dell.com Phone Ext: 5139046 Page 2 of 2 8/17/2011file://C:\Documents and Settings\kirvin\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.O... Page 68 of 184 Page 69 of 184 Page 70 of 184 Page 71 of 184 Page 72 of 184 Quote No. Customer Name: Date: Expiration: Email: Phone: Submitted By: Qty Item ID PriceTotal 150 PXE-GV $24.21$3,631.50 Subtotal $3,631.50 Shipping $0.00 $3,631.50 Print Name: Phone:Ext.Company DUNS #: Date: Print Name: Phone:Ext. Tax Not Included Ironport PXE Encryption Subscription Description TEXAS DIR Contract # DIR-SDD-1456 Authorized Agent Information 214.987.5437 Duke Lamb By execution of the signature line below, I represent that I am an authorized agent of the company and hereby agree to the terms, conditions and pricing contained in this estimate. In addition, I understand that this is a binding document that supercedes all prior verbal and written correspondence. kirvin@uptexas.org Customer Authorization QUOTE INFO:TO: Ken Irvin 081111e The City of University Park Contact/Remit To Address: Signature of Authorized Agent: Quote Total (USD): Fx: 214-420-5888 duke@mandstech.com www.mandstech.com M&S Technologies 2727 LBJ Freeway, Suite 810 Dallas, TX 75234 Phone: 214-420-5813 Purchasing Agent (if different): 8/11/11 8/31/11 Standard payment terms for M&S Technologies, Inc. are Net-30 pending credit approval unless otherwise indicated on this quotation. All multiple Invoice Proposals are W.A.C. IronPort Encryption Subscription Purchasing Agent Information Page 73 of 184 PROPOSAL Company:Date:August 3, 2011 Address:Prepared by:Jerry Hartzell Address 2:Email: jhartzell@mmgt.com City State Terms:Net 30 City of University Park 3800 University Blvd. University Park Texas 75205City, State, Zip Terms:Net 30 Contact:Freight:FOB Destination Telephone:Prepay & Add Email:Via:Best Way FAX:Proposal:Valid for 30 days Project:Proposal Revision 0 OPTION 1 - SOFTWARE ONLY Equipment Crestron RoomView Proposal University Park, Texas 75205 Ken Irvin (214) 987-5390 kirvin@uptexas.org Equipment QTYMFG. MODELDESCRIPTION UNIT PRICEEXTENSION 1Crestron SW-ROOMVW- SERVER RoomView Server Software. Includes Room System Management and MS Outlook Integration. Requires Server. $ 3,340.00 $ 3,340.00 2Crestron TPMC4SM4" Color Room Scheduling Panel (PoE) $ 690.00 $ 1,380.00 Equipment Total 4,720.00$ Project Materials QTYMFG. MODEL DESCRIPTION PRICE 1MMGTTech OpsCables, Connectors, Hardware and Materials200.00$ 200.00$ p ,,$$ Materials Total 200.00$ Professional Services and Installation DESCRIPTION PRICE 1MMGTTech OpsProject Installation, Engineering, Control Programming, Commissioning, Project Management, Training and Documentation $ 6,295.00 6,295.00$ Installation Total 6,295.00$ EQUIPMENT TOTAL 4,720.00$ MATERIALS TOTAL 200.00$ INSTALLATION TOTAL 6,295.00$ SHIPPING, HANDLING AND INSURANCE 425.00$ PROPOSAL TOTAL 11,640.00$ S f Wk Scope of Work: Install 2 scheduling panels outside rooms without control systems. Panels require PoE. Panels will be on client's network. Install RoomView software on client provided server. Integrate RoomView software with client's MS Exchange server. Modify control system programming for RoomView control. Clinet to provide: IP Addressess for color scheduling panels and control systems. Media Management LLC 1801 Royal Lane, Ste 906 Dallas, TX 75229 p 972.409.0900 f 972.409.0903 www.mmgt.com 1 Page 74 of 184 PROPOSAL Company:Date:August 3, 2011 Address:Prepared by:Jerry Hartzell Address 2:Email: jhartzell@mmgt.com City State Terms:Net 30 City of University Park 3800 University Blvd. University Park Texas 75205City, State, Zip Terms:Net 30 Contact:Freight:FOB Destination Telephone:Prepay & Add Email:Via:Best Way FAX:Proposal:Valid for 30 days Project:Proposal Revision 0Crestron RoomView Proposal University Park, Texas 75205 Ken Irvin (214) 987-5390 kirvin@uptexas.org OPTION 2 - PRECONFIGURED SERVER WITH SOFTWARE Equipment Equipment QTYMFG. MODELDESCRIPTION UNIT PRICEEXTENSION 1Crestron CEN-RVS-310PreConfigured Dell Server with RoomView Software Preinstalled. Includes Room System Management and MS Outlook Integration. Dell Server has 3 Year Warranty. $ 13,340.00 $ 13,340.00 2Crestron TPMC4SM4" Color Room Scheduling Panel (PoE) $ 690.00 $ 1,380.00 Equipment Total 14,720.00$ Project Materials QTYMFG. MODELDESCRIPTION PRICEQ 1MMGTTech OpsCables, Connectors, Hardware and Materials 200.00$ 200.00$ Materials Total 200.00$ Professional Services and Installation DESCRIPTION PRICE 1MMGTTech OpsProject Installation, Engineering, Control Programming, Commissioning, Project Management, Training and Documentation $ 6,295.00 6,295.00$ Installation Total 6,295.00$ , EQUIPMENT TOTAL 14,720.00$ MATERIALS TOTAL 200.00$ INSTALLATION TOTAL 6,295.00$ SHIPPING, HANDLING AND INSURANCE 1,325.00$ PROPOSAL TOTAL 22,540.00$ Scope of Work: Install 2 scheduling panels outside rooms without control systems. Panels require PoE. Panels will be on client's network. Install server with preconfigured RoomView software. Integrate RoomView software with client's MS Exchange server. Modify control system programming for RoomView control. Clinet to provide: IP Addressess for color scheduling panels and control systems. Accepted by: Print/Type Name: Print/Type Title: Signature:Signature: Date: Media Management LLC 1801 Royal Lane, Ste 906 Dallas, TX 75229 p 972.409.0900 f 972.409.0903 www.mmgt.com 2 Page 75 of 184 AGENDAMEMO (8/23/2011AGENDA) TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil FROM:GaryW.Adams,ChiefofPolice SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onapprovaloftheRaceJUDICATA5KRunbenefiting the WoundedWarriorProject BACKGROUND: RaceJUDICATAisa5KraceputonbytheSMULawSc hool.Lawschoolstudentswillmarkthe routewithhumansignposts,particpateintherun,andraisemoneyfortheWoundedWarriorProject whichisanon-profitorganizationwiththefollowi nggoals: Toraiseawarenessandenlistthepublic'saidfor theneedsofinjuredservicemembers Tohelpinjuredservicemembersaidandassisteach other Toprovideunique,directprogramsandservicesto meettheneedsofinjuredservicemembers TherouteissituatedonthecampusofSouthernMet hodistUniversity,aswellasresidentialstreets throughUniversityPark.Saturday,September24th istherequesteddatefortherace.Thestarttime is9:00amandthefinishisanticipatedtobe10:0 0am. ThePoliceDepartmenthasapprovedtheroute;andd uetothedayoftheweekandtime,notraffic relatedissuesareanticipated.Furthermore,this sameroutehasbeenusedpreviouslywithout incident. RECOMMENDATION: Staffrecommendsallowingtherequestforthisrun. ATTACHMENTS: JUDICATARaceLetter JUDICATARaceRoute Page 76 of 184 August 18, 2011 Chief Gary W. Adams University Park Police Department 3800 University Boulevard University Park, Texas 75205 Chief Adams, I am helping to organize a 5k run called the ³Race Judicata,´ which is an annual race put on by the law school. Law students will raise money for the Wounded Warrior Project, volunteer to mark the route, and participate in the run. We are hoping to hold the Race Judicata on Saturday, September 24th at 9:00 a.m. The race should conclude before 10:00 a.m. The route, unless otherwise determined by the City Council or other body, will be the same as the one used in 2008 and 2009, as outlined on the attached page. I will serve as the primary contact. My contact information is below. I will be present at the August 23rd City Council meeting to answer any questions. If any questions need to be answered before then, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Jane Cherry J.D. Candidate, May 2013 SMU Dedman School of Law jwcherry@smu.edu 336-407-8583 Page 77 of 184 Page 78 of 184 AGENDAMEMO (8/23/2011AGENDA) TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil FROM:KentAustin,DirectorofFinance SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onordinanceapprovingASCS/Atmos2011RRMsettleme nt agreement BACKGROUND: OnApril1,2011AtmosMid-TexDivision(Atmos)fil edanapplicationforanannual revenueincreaseof$15.7million,withaproposed effectivedateofAugust15, 2011.Theincreaseinnaturalgasrateswouldaffec tUniversityParkandothercities accordingtotheRateReviewMechanism(RRM)proces sestablishedin2007.This processanticipatesaratechangeeachAugust.Atmo sestimatestheimpactonthe averageresidentialcustomerwouldbe$0.56permon th. UniversityParkisamemberoftheAtmosCitiesSte eringCommittee(ASCS),agroupof 154citiesthatjointoreviewraterequestsandre commendactionbymembers.Ashas occurredinthepreviousthreeannualRRMcases,th eCommitteeandAtmoshave reachedanegotiatedsettlement,effectiveSeptembe r1,2011.Astheattachedreport describes,thesettlementauthorizesrevenueof$6.6milliontoberecoveredthroughthe customerchargecomponentofrates,specificallyto covercostsrelatedtotheongoing steelservicelinereplacementprogram. Atmosestimatestheimpactontheaverageresidenti alcustomertobe$0.31per month.Thecurrentresidentialcustomercharge(bas echarge)willrisefrom$7.15to $7.50/monthbutbepartlyoffsetbylowervolumetri c(consumption)charges. CityactionisrequiredbySeptember1.Thealterna tivestoapprovingthesettlement agreementareacontestedratecaseproceedingbefo retheRailroadCommission,which wouldlikelytakeseveralmonthsandmillionsofdo llarsinratecaseexpenses,or acceptanceoftheoriginalhigherraterequest. Moredetailedinformationisprovidedintheattach edmodelstaffreport,preparedby ASCSlegalcounselLloydGosselink. RECOMMENDATION: Citystaffrecommendsapprovaloftheordinancerat ifyingthesettlementagreement betweenAtmosandACSC. ATTACHMENTS: Page 79 of 184 Staffreportonsettlementagreement OrdinanceapprovingAtmos-ACSCsettlementagreement Ordinanceexhibit--RRM-4tariffs Page 80 of 184 1327115/Atmos Mid-Tex RRM-4 Ordinance Staff Report 1 MODEL STAFF REPORT The City, along with approximately 154 other cities served by Atmos Energy Mid-Tex Division (“Atmos Mid-Tex” or “Company”), is a member of the Atmos Cities Steering Committee (“ACSC” or “Steering Committee”). On or about April 1, 2011, Atmos Mid-Tex filed with the City an application to increase natural gas rates pursuant to the Rate Review Mechanism (“RRM”) tariff approved by the City as part of the settlement of the Atmos Mid-Tex 2007 Statement of Intent to increase rates. This is the fourth annual RRM filing. The Atmos Mid-Tex RRM filing sought a $15.7 million rate increase. The City worked with ACSC to analyze the schedules and evidence offered by Atmos Mid-Tex to support its request to increase rates. The Ordinance and attached rate and RRM tariffs are the result of negotiations between ACSC and the Company to resolve issues raised by ACSC during the review and evaluation of ACSC’s RRM filing. The Ordinance resolves the Company’s RRM filing by authorizing supplemental revenue of $6.6 million to be recovered through the customer charge component of rates to cover direct incremental costs associated with a steel service line replacement program approved as part of last year’s rate adjustment. All other relief requested by Atmos Mid-Tex is denied. The ACSC Settlement Committee and ACSC legal counsel recommend that all ACSC Cities adopt the Ordinance implementing the rate change. RRM Background: The RRM tariff was approved by ACSC Cities as part of the settlement agreement to resolve the Atmos Mid-Tex 2007 system-wide rate filing at the Railroad Commission. Atmos Mid-Tex’s current action represents an extension to the three-year trial project known as the Rate Review Mechanism (“RRM”) process. The RRM process was created collaboratively by ACSC and Atmos Mid-Tex as an alternative to the legislatively authorized GRIP surcharge process. ACSC opposed GRIP because it constituted piecemeal ratemaking, did not allow any reasonableness review, and did not allow participation by cities or recovery of cities’ rate case expenses. The RRM process has allowed for a more comprehensive rate review and annual adjustment as a substitute for GRIP filings during the three-year trial period specified by the tariff. Purpose of the Ordinance: Rates cannot change and the Settlement Agreement with Atmos Mid-Tex cannot be implemented without passage of rate ordinances by cities. No related matter is pending at the Railroad Commission. The purpose of the Ordinance is to approve rate tariffs (“Attachment A”) that reflect the negotiated rate change pursuant to the RRM process and to ratify a Settlement Agreement recommended by the ACSC Settlement Committee and Executive Committee. As a result of the negotiations, ACSC was able to reduce the Company’s requested $15.7 million RRM increase to $6.6 million, allowing only incremental revenues necessary to cover direct costs associated with the steel service line replacement program approved by ACSC Cities Page 81 of 184 1327115/Atmos Mid-Tex RRM-4 Ordinance Staff Report 2 in 2010. Approval of the Ordinance will result in the implementation of new rates that increase Atmos Mid-Tex’s revenues effective September 1, 2011. Reasons Justifying Approval of the Negotiated Resolution: During the time that the City has retained original jurisdiction in this case, consultants working on behalf of ACSC cities have investigated the support for the Company’s requested rate increase. While the evidence does not support the $15.7 million increase requested by the Company, ACSC consultants agree that the Company can justify an increase in revenues of $6.6 million, a result consistent with Cities’ approval of a steel service line replacement program last year. The agreement on $6.6 million is a compromise between the positions of the parties. The Settlement Agreement of 2010 which included an extension of the RRM process, included an allowance for recovery of direct costs, excluding overheads, of the steel service line replacement program. Current year recovery factors of $00.15 for residential customers and $00.41 for commercial customers per month were authorized last year. The 2010 Settlement Agreement contemplated that the steel service line replacement program would be adjusted annually, but shall be capped at $00.44 cents for residential customers and $1.22 for commercial customers. The increase in this case is consistent with the caps contemplated last year for the steel service line replacement program, and nothing more. The alternative to a settlement of the RRM filing would be a contested case proceeding before the Railroad Commission on the Company’s current application, would take several months and cost ratepayers millions of dollars in rate case expenses, and would not likely produce a result more favorable than that to be produced by the settlement. The ACSC Settlement Committee recommends that ACSC members take action to approve the Ordinance authorizing new rate tariffs. Steel Service Line Replacement: Under pressure from the Railroad Commission to establish a comprehensive program to replace service lines that contain steel which is subject to corrosion and leaks, ACSC worked with Atmos Mid-Tex in 2010 to establish a risk based approach to steel service line replacement that accomplishes the following goals: 1. Replace all service lines throughout the Mid-Tex Region with the highest degree of risk within two years; 2. Coordination between ACSC city members and Atmos Mid-Tex to minimize disruption of rights of way without compromising safety; 3. To minimize and spread the rate impact on customers of the replacement program, the service lines with little relative risk of leaks should be replaced over a 10-year period; and 4. Current recovery of incremental (above and beyond normal maintenance and repair addressed in RRM proceedings) direct (excluding Atmos Mid-Tex overheads) cost of service line replacement should be permitted as an adder to customer charges. Page 82 of 184 1327115/Atmos Mid-Tex RRM-4 Ordinance Staff Report 3 Fulfillment of these goals in the 2010 case led to $00.15 and $00.41 added to residential and commercial customer charges, respectively. The annual customer charge adder to cover the steel service line replacement program may not exceed $00.44 and $1.22 for residential and commercial customers, respectively, prior to the entry of a Final Order in the next system-wide Statement of Intent rate proceeding. Changes to Customer Charges: The Settlement Agreement approved in 2010 contemplated that incremental revenues to cover future steel service line replacement costs would be recovered through customer charges. Consistent with that approach, the $6.6 million in additional revenues to be recovered following passage of the Ordinance is accomplished by increasing customer charges. The tariffs to be approved by the Ordinance set monthly customer charges at $7.50 and $16.75 for residential and commercial customers, respectively. The commodity portion of the commercial rate will decline slightly from existing rates. Explanation of “Be It Ordained” Paragraphs: 1. This paragraph approves all findings in the Ordinance. 2. This section adopts the attached tariffs (“Attachment A”) in all respects and finds the rates set pursuant to the attached tariffs to be just, reasonable and in the public interest. Note that only new tariffs or existing tariffs being revised are attached to the Ordinance. Existing tariffs not being changed in any way are not attached to the Ordinance. 3. This section requires the Company to reimburse ACSC for reasonable rate making costs associated with reviewing and processing the RRM application. 4. This section repeals any resolution or ordinance that is inconsistent with this Ordinance. 5. This section finds that the meeting was conducted in compliance with the Texas Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code, Chapter 551. 6. This section is a savings clause, which provides that if any section(s) is later found to be unconstitutional or invalid, that finding shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remaining provisions of this Ordinance. This section further directs that the remaining provisions of the Ordinance are to be interpreted as if the offending section or clause never existed. 7. This section provides for an effective date upon passage. 8. This paragraph directs that a copy of the signed Ordinance be sent to a representative of the Company and legal counsel for ACSC. Page 83 of 184 1327084/Atmos Mid-Tex RRM-4 Ordinance 1 ORDINANCE NO. ______________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS, (“CITY”) APPROVING A NEGOTIATED RESOLUTION BETWEEN THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (“ACSC” OR “STEERING COMMITTEE”) AND ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION (“ATMOS MID-TEX” OR “COMPANY”) REGARDING THE COMPANY’S FOURTH ANNUAL RATE REVIEW MECHANISM (“RRM”) FILING IN ALL CITIES EXERCISING ORIGINAL JURISDICTION; DECLARING EXISTING RATES TO BE UNREASONABLE; ADOPTING TARIFFS THAT REFLECT RATE ADJUSTMENTS CONSISTENT WITH THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT AND FINDING THE RATES TO BE SET BY THE ATTACHED TARIFFS TO BE JUST AND REASONABLE; REQUIRING THE COMPANY TO REIMBURSE CITIES’ REASONABLE RATEMAKING EXPENSES; REPEALING CONFLICTING RESOLUTIONS OR ORDINANCES; DETERMINING THAT THIS ORDINANCE WAS PASSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT; ADOPTING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND REQUIRING DELIVERY OF THIS ORDINANCE TO THE COMPANY AND THE STEERING COMMITTEE’S LEGAL COUNSEL. WHEREAS, the City of University Park, Texas (“City”) is a gas utility customer of Atmos Energy Corp., Mid-Tex Division (“Atmos Mid-Tex” or “ Company”), and a regulatory authority with an interest in the rates and charges of Atmos Mid-Tex; and WHEREAS, the City is a member of the Atmos Cities Steering Committee (“ACSC” or “Steering Committee”), a coalition of approximately 154 similarly situated cities served by Atmos Mid-Tex that have joined together to facilitate the review of and response to natural gas issues affecting rates charged in the Atmos Mid-Tex service area (such participating cities are referred to herein as “ACSC Cities”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the agreement settling the Company’s 2007 Statement of Intent to increase rates, ACSC Cities and the Company worked collaboratively to Page 84 of 184 1327084/Atmos Mid-Tex RRM-4 Ordinance 2 develop a Rate Review Mechanism (“RRM”) tariff that allows for an expedited rate review process controlled in a three-year experiment by ACSC Cities as a substitute to the current GRIP process instituted by the Legislature; and WHEREAS, the City took action in 2008 to approve a Settlement Agreement with Atmos Mid-Tex resolving the Company’s 2007 rate case and authorizing the RRM Tariff; and WHEREAS, the 2008 Settlement Agreement contemplates reimbursement of ACSC Cities’ reasonable expenses associated with RRM applications; and WHEREAS, the Steering Committee and Atmos Mid-Tex agreed to extend the RRM process in reaching a settlement in 2010 on the third RRM filing; and WHEREAS, on or about April 1, 2011, the Company filed with the city its fourth annual RRM filing, requesting to increase natural gas base rates by $15.7 million; and WHEREAS, ACSC coordinated its review of Atmos Mid-Tex’s RRM filing by designating a Settlement Committee made up of ACSC representatives, assisted by ACSC attorneys and consultants, to resolve issues identified by ACSC in the Company’s RRM filing; and WHEREAS, independent analysis by ACSC’s rate expert concluded that Atmos Mid-Tex is unable to justify an increase over current rates except for undisputed costs of $6.6 million to cover the steel service line replacement program initiated in 2010; and WHEREAS, the ACSC Settlement Committee, as well as ACSC lawyers and consultants, recommend that ACSC Cities approve the attached rate tariffs (“Attachment A” to this Ordinance), which will increase the Company’s revenue requirement by $6.6 million to extend current recovery of incremental direct costs of the steel service line replacement program authorized by ACSC Cities in ordinances passed in 2010; and Page 85 of 184 1327084/Atmos Mid-Tex RRM-4 Ordinance 3 WHEREAS, the attached tariffs implementing new rates are consistent with the negotiated resolution reached by ACSC Cities and are just, reasonable, and in the public interest. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS: Section 1. That the findings set forth in this Ordinance are hereby in all things approved. Section 2. That the City Council finds the existing rates for natural gas service provided by Atmos Mid-Tex are unreasonable and new tariffs which are attached hereto and incorporated herein as Attachment A, are just and reasonable and are hereby adopted. Section 3. That Atmos Mid-Tex shall reimburse the reasonable ratemaking expenses of the ACSC Cities in processing the Company’s rate application. Section 4. That to the extent any resolution or ordinance previously adopted by the Council is inconsistent with this Ordinance, it is hereby repealed. Section 5. That the meeting at which this Ordinance was approved was in all things conducted in strict compliance with the Texas Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code, Chapter 551. Section 6. That if any one or more sections or clauses of this Ordinance is adjudged to be unconstitutional or invalid, such judgment shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remaining provisions of this Ordinance and the remaining provisions of the Ordinance shall be interpreted as if the offending section or clause never existed. Section 7. That this Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage with rates authorized by attached Tariffs to be effective for bills rendered on or after September 1, 2011. Page 86 of 184 1327084/Atmos Mid-Tex RRM-4 Ordinance 4 Section 8. That a copy of this Ordinance shall be sent to Atmos Mid-Tex, care of David Park, Vice President Rates and Regulatory Affairs, at Atmos Energy Corporation, 5420 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1862, Dallas, Texas 75240, and to Geoffrey Gay, General Counsel to ACSC, at Lloyd Gosselink Rochelle & Townsend, P.C., P.O. Box 1725, Austin, Texas 78767-1725. PASSED AND APPROVED this 23rd day of August, 2011. _________________________________ W. RICHARD DAVIS, MAYOR ATTEST: __________________________________ ELIZABETH SPECTOR, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM: ___________________________________ ROBERT L. DILLARD, III, CITY ATTORNEY Page 87 of 184 Page 88 of 184 Page 89 of 184 Page 90 of 184 Page 91 of 184 Page 92 of 184 Page 93 of 184 AGENDAMEMO (8/23/2011AGENDA) TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil FROM:KentAustin,DirectorofFinance SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:toadoptthe2011CertifiedPrope rtyAppraisalRoll BACKGROUND: EachyearbyJuly25 ,theDallasCentralAppraisalDistrict(DCAD)prov idestheCitywiththe certifiedtaxroll.Therollisalistofallprop ertyparcelsinthecityandtheirassociatedmarke tand taxablevalues.Thesumofthetaxablevaluesist hetaxbaseuponwhichtheCityappliesitstaxrat e supportingthenextfiscalyearbudget.Officiala doptionofthetaxrolloccursbyCityCouncil resolution. Thetablebelowdisplaysthisyear'smarketvalue,taxablevalue,newconstructionvalue,andover-65 homesteadexemptionamountscomparedwithlastyear .Forthesecondyearinarow,theoverall valueofpropertyfellinUniversityPark,thistim eby2.44%.Theover-65 homesteadexemptiontotal decreasedby$19,436,783,duetothereductionoft heexemptionfrom$297,000to$280,000 andthe decreaseinthenumberofeligibleparcels(from1,160to1,157). MarketValue TaxableValue New Construction Over-65 Exemption 2011 $8,149,526,370$5,568,088,524$45,708,824$318,701,501 2010$8,340,551,340$5,707,112,954$75,680,187$338,138,284 Change$($191,024,970)($139,024,430)($29,971,363)($19,436,783) Change%-2.29%-2.44%-39.60%-5.75% RECOMMENDATION: Citystaffrecommendsapprovaloftheresolutionad optingthe2011certifiedtaxrollof $8,149,526,370marketvalue,$5,568,088,524taxable value,and$45,708,824newconstructionvalue. ATTACHMENTS: Certifiedpropertyappraisalrollletter2011 Resolutionadopting2011certifiedpropertyapprais alroll Page 94 of 184 DALLAS CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT CERTIFICATION OF APPRAISAL ROLL Year: 2011 Jurisdiction: UNIVERSITY PARK In accordance with the requirements of the Texas Property Tax Code, Chapter 26, Section 26.01, paragraphs (A) and (B), the following values are hereby certified: Market ValueTaxable Value *Total Value of New Construction in Certified Market Value above I, W. Kenneth Nolan, Executive Director/Chief Appraiser of the Dallas Central Appraisal District, do hereby certify the aforementioned values and totals to the taxing jurisdiction indicated above, in accordance with the requirements of the laws of the State of Texas on this 20th day of July, 2011. Dallas Central Appraisal District W. Kenneth Nolan Executive Director/Chief Appraiser $8,149,526,370 $5,568,088,524 $45,708,824 Market Value of all Real & Business Personal Property Before Qualified Exemptions* Taxable Value of all Real & Business Personal Property In accordance with the requirements of the Texas Property Tax Code, Chapter 26, Section 26.01, paragraph (C), the following values are hereby certified as disputed values and are not included in the above totals: Values under protest as determined by the Appraisal District** Values under protest as claimed by property owner or estimated by Appraisal District in event property owner's claim is upheld Freeport Estimated Loss Estimated Net Taxable **Value of Disputed New Construction in Protested Market Value Above $0 $5,895,820 $950,000 $0 $665,000 $5,285,440 $665,000 2949 N Stemmons Fwy, Dallas, TX 75247-6195 (214) 631-0520 Page 95 of 184 RESOLUTION NO. ________________________ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS, ADOPTING THE 2011 APPRAISAL ROLL OF THE DALLAS CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT FOR THE CITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City’s assessor and collector of taxes has submitted to the City Council the 2011 tax appraisal roll compiled by the Dallas Central Appraisal District; and WHEREAS, the City Council is of the opinion that the 2011 appraisal roll should be approved and adopted; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the 2011 appraisal roll for the City of University Park, as presented by the Dallas Central Appraisal District, be, and the same is hereby, approved and adopted in all respects showing a total appraised property value of $8,149,526,370, new property added to the tax roll of a taxable value of $45,708,824, and a total taxable value of property, after exemptions, for 2011 of $5,568,088,524. SECTION 2. This Resolution shall take effect immediately from and after its passage, and it is accordingly so resolved. DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of University Park, Texas, on the 23rd day of August, 2011. APPROVED: __________________________________ W. RICHARD DAVIS, MAYOR APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: __________________________________ __________________________________ CITY ATTORNEY CITY SECRETARY Page 96 of 184 AGENDAMEMO (8/23/2011AGENDA) TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil FROM:LizSpector SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onaresolutionapprovingtheAgreementofCooperat ion betweentheCityofUniversityParkandDallasCoun tyqualifyingtheCountyforthe CDBG/HOMEentitlementprograms BACKGROUND: AttheJuly19,2011CityCouncilMeetingtheCoun cilapprovedanInterlocalAgreementwith DallasCountyauthorizingtheCountytoincludethe populationcountoftheCityofUniversityPark whenqualifyingforU.S.DepartmentofHousingand UrbanDevelopmentblockgrants.This agreementhasbeenexecutedandforwardedtoKimNo blesattheCounty'sPlanningandZoning department. IsubsequentlyreceivedaphonecallfromMs.Noble srequestingaresolutionapprovingthis agreement.Theattachedresolutionconfirmsyourp reviousauthorizationtoenterintotheInterlocal Agreement. ATTACHMENTS: CDBGInterlocalResolution Page 97 of 184 RESOLUTION NO. _______ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND DALLAS COUNTY FOR THE COUNTY TO QUALIFY FOR THE URBAN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM; STATING THE UNDERSTANDINGS AND AGREEMENTS OF THE PARTIES; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH DALLAS COUNTY UNDER CHAPTER 791 OF THE TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the 93rd Session of the Congress passed, and the President of the United States signed into law, the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (PL93-383) which created the Urban County Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program; and WHEREAS, Dallas County, Texas is applying to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for Urban County CDBG entitlement status; and WHEREAS, in order to qualify for this status, Dallas County must enter into cooperative agreements with local governments and have the collective population of the County’s unincorporated area and the participating local governments total at least 100,000 people; and WHEREAS, Texas cities and counties are authorized under Chapter 373, Local Government Code, and Section 381.003, Local Government Code, to conduct essential Housing and Community Development activities; and WHEREAS, Texas cities and counties are authorized under Chapter 791, Government Code, to enter into cooperative agreements with one another, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the City of University Park supports the efforts of Dallas County, Texas to qualify for the Urban County CDBG program and asks that its population be included in such a program beginning for Federal Fiscal Years 2012, 2013 and 2014. SECTION 2. This agreement covers the CDBG entitlement program and when applicable, the HOME Investment Partnership and Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG) programs. SECTION 3. This agreement remains in effect until the CDBG (HOME and ESG, where applicable) funds and program income received with respect to the three year qualification period are expended and the funded activities completed, and that the County and City may not terminate or withdraw from the agreement while the agreement remains in effect. SECTION 4. The Mayor or his designee is hereby authorized to sign any additional forms on behalf of the City of University Park that the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development may require. Page 98 of 184 SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect immediately from and after its passage and it is accordingly so resolved. DULY RESOLVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of University Park, Texas this 23rd day of August, 2011. APPROVED: ____________________________________ JERRY GRABLE, MAYOR PRO TEMPORE ATTEST: _____________________________________ ELIZABETH SPECTOR, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM: ____________________________ CITY ATTORNEY Page 99 of 184 AGENDAMEMO (8/23/2011AGENDA) TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil FROM:LizSpector SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onminutesoftheJuly19,2011C ityCouncilMeeting BACKGROUND: MinutesoftheJuly19,2011CityCouncilMeetinga reattachedfortheCouncil'sreview. ATTACHMENTS: July19,2011Minutes Page 100 of 184 MINUTES AGENDA #2817 CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS COUNCIL CHAMBER – CITY HALL TUESDAY, JULY 19, 2011, 5:00 P.M. 2:02 - 2:50 P.M. EXECUTIVE SESSION UNDER TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE 551.071 THE COUNCIL CONVENED INTO CLOSED EXECUTIVE SESSION TO RECEIVE CONFIDENTIAL LEGAL ADVICE FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY REGARDING POTENTIAL ELECTION CHANGES DUE TO SB 100 AND POTENTIAL LITIGATION REGARDING SEWER BACKUP. NO ACTION WAS TAKEN. EXECUTIVE CONFERENCE ROOM, CITY HALL. 3:00 - 4:00 P.M. PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS STAFF PRESENTED INFORMATION TO THE COUNCIL REGARDING POTENTIAL PROJECTS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO VARIOUS LOCATIONS INCLUDING CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY OVERPASSES, SNIDER PLAZA AND MIRACLE MILE SHOPPING AREAS, MCFARLIN BLVD., SEVERAL MEDIAN AREAS, THE PEEK SERVICE CENTER, AND THE CURTIS PARK FOOTBRIDGE. EXECUTIVE CONFERENCE ROOM, FIRST FLOOR, CITY HALL. 4:00 - 5:00 P.M. WORK SESSION FOR AGENDA REVIEW EXECUTIVE CONFERENCE ROOM, FIRST FLOOR, CITY HALL. The Regular City Council Meeting was called into session at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at City Hall. Present were Councilmember Begert, Councilmember Clark, Mayor Davis, Mayor Pro Tem Grable, and Councilmember Stewart. Also in attendance were City Attorney Dillard, and City Manager Livingston. City Manager Livingston introduced staff as follows: Community Information Officer Steve Mace, Director of Information Services Jim Criswell, Police Chief Gary Adams, Director of Public Works Bud Smallwood, City Secretary Liz Spector, Chief Planning Official Harry Persaud, Administrative Assistant George Ertle, Director of Parks Gerry Bradley, Director of Community Development Robbie Corder, Assistant Director of Public Works Jacob Speer, Director of Finance Kent Austin, and Fire Chief Randy Howell. I. CALL TO ORDER A. INVOCATION: Mayor W. Richard Davis B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor W. Richard Davis C. INTRODUCTION OF COUNCIL: Mayor W. Richard Davis D. INTRODUCTION OF STAFF: City Manager Bob Livingston II. AWARDS AND RECOGNITION A. PROCLAMATION: in appreciation of cast stone markers donated by Russ and Melissa Rieman Page 101 of 184 ORDINANCE NO. 11/13 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS, AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES BY AMENDING SECTION 13.04.066 (c) REGULATING CONNECTIONS TO THE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM AND THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM; AUTHORIZING INSPECTIONS; REQUIRING DISCONNECTION OF ILLICIT CONNECTIONS; PROVIDING FOR NOTICE AND OPPORTUNITY TO DISCONNECT; AUTHORIZING DISCONNECTION FROM WATER SUPPLY; AUTHORIZING CITY TO PERFORM WORK AND CLAIM LIEN ON PROPERTY; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($500.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ORDINANCE NO. 11/14 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK TEXAS, ABANDONING A PORTION OF THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY OF MCFARLIN BOULEVARD, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AND DEPICTED IN EXHIBIT “B”, TO THE ABUTTING OWNER, SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY, IN EXCHANGE FOR DEDICATION OF NEW STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR AIRLINE ROAD, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AND DEPICTED IN EXHIBIT “A”; AND PROVIDING FOR THE FURNISHING OF A CERTIFIED COPY OF THIS III. CONSENT AGENDA A. CONSIDER AND ACT: on a resolution approving an Interlocal Agreement for Cooperative Purchasing with the City of McKinney B. CONSIDER AND ACT: on a resolution approving an Interlocal Agreement with TIPS Purchasing Cooperative C. REPORT: receive 3rd Quarter (06/30/2011) FY2011 fund report D. CONSIDER AND ACT: on renewal of a cooperative agreement with Dallas County for the CDBG/HOME Program E. CONSIDER AND ACT: on an ordinance regulating connections to the sanitary and storm sewer systems F. CONSIDER AND ACT: on a proposal from DFW Communications for the installation of a monopole at the Peek Service Center G. CONSIDER AND ACT: to review bids and award a contract for in-place recycling of asphalt pavement at various locations H. CONSIDER AND ACT: on a request to abandon certain street rights-of-way I. CONSIDER AND ACT: on an ordinance abandoning certain property adjacent to the McFarlin Avenue right-of-way to SMU Page 102 of 184 ORDINANCE FOR RECORDING IN THE REAL PROPERTY RECORDS OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS, AS A QUITCLAIM DEED OF THE CITY IN EXCHANGE FOR A DEDICATION DEED FROM SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. City Manager Livingston read through the items included on the Consent Agenda. Mayor Davis reminded the Council that during the work session he requested that Item F, a proposal from DFW Communications to install a monopole at the Peek Service Center, be removed from the Consent Agenda until further study. Councilmember Stewart made a motion to approve all items on the Consent Agenda except Item F, a proposal from DFW Communications to install a monopole at the Peek Service Center. Councilmember Clark seconded, and the motion carried unanimously. Mayor Davis asked Chief Planning Official Harry Persaud for a brief summary. He also requested the applicant to limit their presentation to 15 minutes and asked that the total time allowed to speak against the application be limited to 15 minutes. Chief Planning Official Harry Persaud addressed the Council. He said 41 notices were mailed to surrounding property owners. He stated that 14 notices were returned opposed, and none were returned supporting the application. Mr. Persaud said this created an oppositional response of 33.76% which triggers the 20% rule requiring a supermajority of the Council to approve this item. He said a supermajority would require 4 out of 5 of the Council to approve the rezoning request. Mayor Davis asked City Attorney Dillard to explain the 20% rule. Mr. Dillard explained the Texas Code Section which addresses this issue. Mr. Persaud said that several petitions opposing the proposition were delivered to city staff and copies are included in the agenda packet for the Council’s review. He also stated that a map was created to show the location of the addresses of negative responses. Mr. Persaud said the current proposal from Legacy Hillcrest includes the O-2 (Office) and P (Parking) tracts. He said unlike the developer’s previous submissions, the MF-2 tract is not included. Mr. Persaud said this rezoning request was received on January 24, 2011 and included a site plan with 150,000 square feet of leasable space. He said of this total, the developer requested a maximum of 130,000 sf for office space, a maximum of 20,000 sf for restaurant and retail, a maximum of 50,000 sf for hotel space and 30,000 sf for underground space and one J. CONSIDER AND ACT: on approval of minutes of the June 21, 2011 City Council Meeting IV. MAIN AGENDA A. PUBLIC HEARING: on a request by Legacy Hillcrest Investments for a change of zoning from Parking "P" and Office "O-2" zoning district classification to Planned Development District "PD-37" and consideration of a Conceptual Site Plan for a mixed- use development to include, but not limited to, Hotel, one Single-Family unit, Offices, Retail and Parking below grade. Page 103 of 184 single-family unit. Mr. Persaud said the plan was presented to the Planning & Zoning Commission for public hearings on March 8, 2011 and April 12, 2011. He said after the P & Z deliberations, they unanimously forwarded a recommendation to the Council for final consideration. Mr. Persaud said a draft ordinance incorporating those recommendations was provided to the Council in the agenda packet. Mayor Davis opened the public hearing. Mr. Art Anderson, representing the applicant, addressed the Council. He said his client supported the P &Z recommendation to the Council. Mr. Anderson mentioned that an alley abandonment application has been filed. Mr. Anderson said comments that had been received from neighborhood residents indicated they were tired of attending public hearings to voice their opinion, and so his client has submitted the bottom-line level of density and subsurface parking that can realistically be built and still allow a quality development. Mr. Anderson said under existing zoning, a development of 108,000 sf could be built. He said this would require a 3-level above ground parking garage to meet requirements of today’s code. He said his client felt it would not be economically feasible to build subsurface parking with that floor-to-area ratio. He displayed a chart comparing Legacy Hillcrest’s four submissions on this rezoning request: 2001, 2007, the original 2011 application and the 2011 P & Z recommendation. He stated his client has reduced the proposed development size from 270,500 square feet to 135,000 sf. to satisfy the residents and the Council. He said the building height has been decreased from 120 feet to 72.5 feet. Mr. Anderson stated the developer has requested flexibility regarding number of floors on the low-rise building. He said due to the slope on the site, there is a potential for a half floor but the number of floors will not impact the maximum allowable square footage. He said the amount of occupiable space will remain within the parameters as requested by P & Z. Mr. Anderson said the references points used to measure the building heights are same points used in all the previous applications. Mr. Anderson stated this development would be beneficial for the community. He said Planned Development zoning requires a detailed site plan review by the City, but under existing zoning, no site plan review is required. He said his client has included siginificant landscaping for the development. Mr. Anderson mentioned that under PD requirements, if the number of trips incurred due to the development are not less, there is a procedure within 18 months to reevalute with a traffic study and make sure the traffic patterns are as represented and no additional improvements are needed. Mr. Anderson said the petitions submitted by the residents in opposition to the proposal stated there will be a devaluation of their properties. Mr. Anderson said his client thinks there will be an increase to their property values because the development will be an Page 104 of 184 improvement to the area. He stated that P & Z took care to ensure the adjacency issue was addressed by requiring a 25 ft. setback on Haynie, subsurface parking, enhanced landscaping, special facade treatment, and no direct access or balconies facing Haynie. Resident Duncan Fulton addressed the Council regarding his opposition to the proposed development. He requests the Council deny approval of the application. Mr. Fulton compared the density of the proposed project to the surrounding areas and said if built as presented, the development would be 3.5 times as dense as the commercial property to the south, 1.75 times as dense as the commercial property to the north, and 30% more dense than current development rights. He said this is contrary to good zoning practice. Mr. Fulton said a typical response to zoning that is close to residential is to require transitional zoning, down zoning rather than up. He said by allowing the accessory uses in the basement to not count towards the total allowable square footage, the developer is actually receiving a benefit of more leasable space in the building. Mr. Fulton stated that Snider Plaza is currently 700 parking spaces short according a study done for the City in May 2008, and he said the proposed development stands to make that situation worse and is inconsistent with good public policy. Mayor Davis addressed Mr. Anderson regarding a letter he wrote. Mayor Davis said the letter stated if the Council were to make any further reductions to the allowable square footage of the development, the applicant would withdraw their rezoning request. Mr. Anderson said that was the intent of his client. He said the developer felt that any further reductions would eliminate the economic feasibility of constructing subsurface parking at the site. Councilmember Clark asked if Mr. Anderson agreed with Mr. Fulton's and staff’s FAR calculations. Mr. Anderson said no. He said he considers the development a combined project, with FAR of around 2:1, with the properties one unified development project. He said that he thinks the development will be overparked, but his client is willing to abide by the City's parking requirements, althought it will be costly. Mr. Anderson said this development is more of a transitional development, from the 3:1 FAR in Snider Plaza down to the GR. He said the development will attempt to address the transition about what the development will look like from a home across Haynie. No one wished to speak to the item further and Mayor Davis closed the public hearing. Mayor Davis stated that the Council plans to continue discussions on this rezoning request at the September 6, 2011 Council Meeting. No action was taken on item B. Community Development Director Robbie Corder addressed the Council regarding a B. CONSIDER AND ACT: on 5-Year Capital Projects recommendations and resident requests and provide direction to staff C. DISCUSS: fence heights in rear yards Page 105 of 184 proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to allow residential lots with grade changes between the alley and the rear yard significant enough to require a retaining wall to have fences taller than the maximum 8-foot height currently set in the Code. Mr. Corder said staff recommends making this change because there have been many similar cases before the Board of Adjustment requesting additional heights on fences. He said the Council referred the issue to ZOAC in June and they unanimously recommended the City proceed with an amendment to allow homeowners with a rear yard grade change to apply for fences with a 10-foot maximum rather than the standard 8-foot maximum. He said the limitations would be a two-foot retaining wall with an 8- foot fence on top of that. Mr. Corder requested the Council to refer the proposed amendment to P & Z for a public hearing. Mayor Davis asked if the Council had any objections, and as there were none, he instructed staff to refer the issue to the Planning & Zoning Commission. Mr. Livingston said if anyone present wished to address the Council they may do so at this time. Resident Carolyn Loy thanked the Council for approving the Apache helicopter to be on-site during the July 4 parade and picnic. Resident Mitchell Foote, 4501 Druid, addressed the Council. Mr. Foote requested the City to bring the section of Turtle Creek between University and Turtle Creek Blvd. on the west side of Goar Park up to the same standards as the rest of the parks and waterways in the City. He said the drainage structures under University Blvd. should be reviewed to ensure they are working properly. He said the focus should be on the sediment and debris in the creek. He also mentioned that it may be beneficial for the City to install fencing in the lower areas of the creek for safety reasons and to prevent soccer balls and other items from falling into the creek and clogging up the waterway. Mayor Davis thanked Mr. Foote for his comments. As there were no more requests to address the Council, Mayor Davis adjourned the meeting. Considered and approved this 23rd day of August, 2011. _____________________________ W. Richard Davis, Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________ Elizabeth Spector, City Secretary V. ITEMS FROM THE FLOOR Page 106 of 184 AGENDAMEMO (8/23/2011AGENDA) TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil FROM:LizSpector SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onminutesoftheJuly28,2011C ityCouncilMeeting BACKGROUND: TheminutesoftheJuly28,2011CityCouncilMeeti ngareattachedfortheCouncil'sreview. ATTACHMENTS: July28,2011Minutes Page 107 of 184 MINUTES AGENDA #2818 CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS COUNCIL CHAMBER – CITY HALL THURSDAY, JULY 28, 2011, 11:00 A.M. The Regular City Council Meeting was called into session at 11:00 a.m. in the Council Chamber at City Hall. Present were Mayor Pro Tem Grable, Mayor Davis, Councilmember Clark, and Councilmember Begert. Also in attendance were City Manager Livingston, and City Attorney Dillard. Under Texas Government Code 551.071, the Council recessed into Executive Session to receive confidential legal advice from the City Attorney regarding Legacy Hillcrest Investments, L.P. at 11:01 a.m. Present at the Executive Session were Mayor Davis, Mayor Pro Tem Grable, Councilmember Begert, Councilmember Clark and City Attorney Dillard. Councilmember Stewart joined the Executive Session at 11:30 a.m. The Council reconvened into Open Session at 12:00 p.m. No action was taken on Item A under the Main Agenda and Mayor Davis asked for a motion to adjourn the meeting. Councilmember Begert made a motion to adjourn. Mayor Pro Tem Grable seconded, and the motion carried unanimously. Considered and approved this 23rd day of August, 2011. _________________________________ W. Richard Davis, Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________ Elizabeth Spector, City Secretary I. CALL TO ORDER II. MAIN AGENDA A. CONSIDER AND ACT: to provide direction to staff regarding the issuance of a building permit to Legacy Hillcrest Investments, L.P. Page 108 of 184 AGENDAMEMO (8/23/2011AGENDA) TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil FROM:KentAustin,DirectorofFinance SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onpresentationofproposedFY2012CityManager'sB udget andpublichearingsonbudgetandtaxrate BACKGROUND: StateofTexasstatutesrequirecitiestoproviden oticeandholdpublichearingsbeforeadoptingan annualbudgetandpropertytaxrate. ProposedFY2012budget Section102oftheTexasLocalGovernmentCoderequ iresthatabudgethearingbeheldnosooner than15daysaftertheproposedbudgetisfiledwit hthemunicipalclerk.UsingAugust5,2011,asa filingdate,ahearingsetforAugust23,2011meet sthisrequirement. AsecondbudgethearingisproposedfortheSeptemb er6,2011,CityCouncilmeeting.Afterthis hearing,theCouncilisscheduledtoactonthepro posedbudgetandtaxrate. TheproposedFY2011budgetof$43,027,730is0.51%lowerthantheFY2011adoptedbudgetof $43,242,989.Thebudgetincludesapropertytaxde creaseandnochangeinwater,wastewater,or sanitationrates.Nonewfull-timepositionsarep roposed,andnomarket-basedpayraiseisincluded. Detailsontheproposedbudget'sexpendituresandr evenuesareprovidedintheattachedCity Manager'sbudgetmemo. TheFinanceAdvisoryCommitteemetAugust11,2011,toreviewtheproposedbudgetand recommendeditsadoptionasproposed.Twootherad visorycommittees--EmployeeBenefitsand Property,Casualty,andLiabilityInsurance--are meetinginAugusttoreviewthebudgetandmakea recommendationtotheCouncil. Proposedpropertytaxrate ThepropertytaxistheGeneralFund'sprimarysour ceofrevenue.InthecurrentFY2011budget, $15,891,653ofthe$27,058,111GeneralFundrevenue isderivedfromcurrentyearpropertytaxes. The2011certifiedtaxrollfell2.29%inmarketva lueand2.44%intaxablevaluecomparedtolast year.Thisisthesecondyearinarowandjustth esecondtimesince1991thatpropertyvalueshave falleninthecity.Theaveragesingle-familyhome inUniversityParkhasa2011marketvalueof $1,093,015,down2.43%fromlastyear.Reducingth isvaluebythe20%homesteadexemptionyields anaveragetaxablevalueof$874,412.Theproposed budgetincludesataxrateof27.845centsper $100taxablevalue,thesameasthecurrentyear.Theaveragesingle-familyhomeownerwouldpay $60lessinpropertytaxes($2,435in2011vs.$2,4 95in2010). TheCity'staxcollector,theDallasCountyTaxOff ice,providestheofficialEffectiveTaxRate(ETR) calculation.TheETRisthetaxratethatwouldra isethesameamountoftaxrevenueinthenewyear Page 109 of 184 asintheoldonpropertiesonthetaxrollbothye ars.Thisissignificantbecauseitdrivesthenot ice andhearingrequirementsacitymustmeetpertheT exasTruth-in-Taxationlaw(TexasTaxCode, Section26).Citiesproposinganeffectivetaxinc reasegreaterthantheprioryearmustholdtwo separatepublichearingsaboutthetaxrate. TheETRthisyearis$0.286086,whichislessthan theproposedrateof$0.27845.Accordingtothe formulasandassumptionsusedintheofficialETRc alculation,theproposed$0.27845rate woulddecreasetaxesby$387,311,or2.44%,fromla styear'sbudget.Consequently,nospecial publicnoticesandhearingsarerequired. RECOMMENDATION: Citystaffrecommendsholdingpublichearingsatth eAugust23andSeptember6,2011,CityCouncil meetings.Thiswillallowresidentsachancetoas kquestionsorprovidecommentsaboutthe proposedbudgetandtaxrate. ATTACHMENTS: CityManager'sbudgetmemoFY2012withdetail PowerPointslidesFY2012proposedbudget Page 110 of 184 CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS FY2012 PROPOSED BUDGET October 1, 2011 – September 30, 2012 August 5, 2011 This budget will lower total property taxes versus last year’s budget by -$387,311 or -2.44%, and of that amount, $127,276 is tax revenue to be raised from new property added to the tax roll this year. This statement is required by HB 3195 of the 80th Texas Legislature. Page 111 of 184 1 M E M O DATE: August 5, 2011 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Bob Livingston, City Manager SUBJECT: Proposed FY2012 budget INTRODUCTION This memo presents the City Manager’s proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2012 (FY2012, the period October 1, 2011 – September 30, 2012). The proposed FY2012 expenditure budget totals $43,027,730, a reduction of 0.51% from FY2011. Lower personnel costs, from the deletion of two positions, a sharply lower TMRS contribution rate, and reduced health insurance contributions, have allowed the budget to drop compared to last year. While the overall economy continues to sputter, during this past year we have begun to see some evidence locally that a recovery has started. Some examples: • Sales tax revenues have turned upward--we expect to collect $3,304,000 this year compared with the FY2011 budget amount of $3,028,851. In FY2010 we collected $3,121,443. This turnaround allows us to increase our sales tax projection for FY2012. • Single family home starts have begun to rebound--starts in FY 2011 should exceed the previous year by 50%. During FY2011 the permits for the George W. Bush Presidential Center ($1,670,697) helped to offset the decreased number of single family permits early in the year. Permit revenue for the first ten months of FY2011 totaled $2,535,436, compared with a budget of $1,400,000. While FY2012 will not feature another presidential library permit, we propose to leave the revenue projection at $1,400,000. • Direct alarm monitoring and swimming pool revenues continue to be bright spots—alarm monitoring revenue has increased from $652,999 in FY2008 to a projected $798,016 in FY2011, while swimming pool revenues have jumped from $180,572 in FY2008 to an estimated $302,855 in FY2011. However, other major revenue sources continue to lag. For example: • Property values fell for the second year in a row, by 2.44%. The proposed budget maintains the Page 112 of 184 2 same property tax rate as last year, $0.278945, which will generate $387,311 less current property tax revenue than in FY 2011. The drop in revenue is offset by expenditure reductions and increases in other revenue estimates. It is worth noting that the step by the Council to increase the tax rate last year has mitigated the loss in property tax revenue for FY2012. If the tax rate had remained at $0.26548 last year, the loss of property tax revenue in FY2012 would have been $722,181. • Interest rates continue to be at all-time lows. Citywide, investment income has fallen from $1,128,619 in FY2008 to an estimated $303,000 in FY2011. Even a one percent increase in yields would generate an additional $500,000 in revenue. As in previous years, the department heads have done an excellent job of maintaining current expenditure levels wherever possible. Department budgets in most cases propose little or no increase over the previous year’s expenditure requests. Thanks to the lower personnel costs, the resulting expenditure budgets for the General Fund and Sanitation Fund propose slight decreases (1.23% and 1.64%). The proposed Utility Fund budget is up 1.30% because of higher wholesale wastewater charges (up $312,481, or 14.9%) from Dallas Water Utilities. This increase results from sharply higher winter water consumption last year (up 21.4%), which is the basis for computing wastewater charges. On the positive side, this also means higher wastewater revenues for the City with no change in the wastewater rate. Other highlights of the proposed $43,027,730 budget: • The General, Utility, and Sanitation Fund budgets are balanced. • Two full-time positions have been eliminated, reducing the number of full-time employees from 243 to 241. • No market-based raise is included for City employees, following last year’s 3% salary increase. About 20% of employees may be eligible for 3% merit increases. • No water, wastewater, or sanitation rate increases are included. • Support for the University Park public library is continued at the existing level ($196,555), while discussions about the library’s future move to the Plaza at Preston Center continue. • The City’s investment in automation and effective use of technology continues. Four major software upgrades were completed over the last 12 months – Finance/Utility Billing, Police, Fire, and Municipal Court. • Pay-as-you-go capital project funding of $5.2 million is maintained. As I have said in the past two budgets, I want to commend our department heads and employees for preparing budgets that balance the current economic climate with continued delivery of quality services. Over the last two years, the General Fund budget has decreased 0.3%, compared to a 4.7% rise in the Consumer Price Index for Dallas-Fort Worth and an 8.3% increase in the Municipal Cost Index (MCI). The MCI is a statistic developed by American City & County magazine that is designed to show the specific effects of inflation on the cost of providing city services. It differs from the Consumer Price Index by including elements common to cities, like health care, fuel, construction materials, and so on. The table below compares total expenditures for the City’s three budgeted funds – General, Utility, and Sanitation. Three other funds – Capital Projects, Equipment Services, and Self-Insurance – are not included in the formal budget, because their revenues originate from line-items in the three budgeted funds. A summary page showing the proposed budget by fund and department is attached, as is a worksheet detailing the property tax impact of the proposed FY2012 budget. Page 113 of 184 3 Total Budgeted Expenditures Comparison Fund FY2010 Adopted Budget FY2011 Adopted Budget FY2012 Proposed Budget Change $ Change % General $26,803,045$27,058,111$26,724,086-$334,025 -1.23% Utility 12,823,36813,268,97513,435,168$166,193 1.30% Sanitation 2,887,655 2,915,903 2,868,476 -$47,427 -1.64% Total $42,514,068$43,242,989$43,027,730-$215,259 -0.51% CITYWIDE ISSUES Six categories account for most of the budget’s expenditures; the impact of these categories compared to last year is shown below: Major expenditure categories comparison Category FY2011 FY2012 Change $ Change % Personnel costs $23,385,195 $22,784,129 -$601,066-2.6% Treatment charges $6,580,092 $6,737,387 +$157,295+2.4% Capital projects $5,227,602 $5,227,602 $00.0% Electricity costs $588,320 $627,253 $38,9346.6% Equip. replacement $495,759 $540,061 $44,3028.9% Fuel costs $433,653 $436,840 $3,1870.7% PERSONNEL Salaries and benefits comprise 53% ($22.8 million) of the $43 million total budget. Two positions have been deleted from the proposed FY2012 budget, leaving the City with 241 full-time positions: • An open firefighter position included in last year’s budget has been removed, resulting in a $108,884 savings. • A custodian position in Parks has been deleted following the incumbent’s retirement. This is the second custodial position to be eliminated; its $56,216 annual cost is partially offset by a $43,000 increase in the Parks contract maintenance account. The City began contracting for City Hall janitorial service in December 2009 and the Peek Center in 2010. Salary changes No market-based raise is included in the proposed budget. A 3% market raise was included in the FY2011 budget. Under the City’s pay plan, about 20% of employees remain eligible for 3% merit-based pay raises. The City continues to enjoy a very low employee turnover rate, which is an indicator that our salaries and benefits are competitive with other area cities and private employers. Maintaining a competitive salary and benefits plan is essential for retaining and recruiting quality employees. Page 114 of 184 4 Benefit changes Employee health insurance No change is proposed for employee health insurance benefits or employee contributions, but the budget does include a $99,000 reduction in City contributions to the self-insurance program, from $2,214,000 to $2,015,000. In calendar 2007-2010 and so far in 2011, the plan has operated at a surplus, and the Self- Insurance Fund’s balance has grown. Reducing the contributions to the fund seems to be a prudent and appropriate change. Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) costs As is the case with many cities this year, University Park is benefiting from sharply reduced TMRS employer contribution rates. A change in state law allowed TMRS to reconfigure their internal fund structure, which in turn lowered the related revenue requirement. TMRS has determined the City contribution rate for 2012 to be just 7.5%, compared to last year’s 13.10%. The City has been paying in at a rate of 13.87% of payroll to more quickly pay down its unfunded liability. Rather than budget for an entire rate reduction to 7.5%, the proposed FY2012 budget includes a contribution rate of 10.5%. This provides room for another reduction next year. No cost of living adjustment (COLA) for retirees or service credit update for current employees is included in the rate. Firefighters’ Relief and Retirement Fund (FRRF) costs University Park Fire Department personnel belong to a separate retirement system that is governed by a local board made up of three firefighters, two local residents, and two City representatives. The FRRF is structured as a defined benefit plan and is currently underfunded on an actuarial basis, although its status has improved due to changes in the plan. Most importantly, in 2008 the firefighters voted to increase their own contribution rate from 10% of gross pay to 15% over a three year period, beginning in FY2010. This move is designed to restore the plan to actuarial soundness and ultimately match the City’s contribution rate, which is 15.54%. In FY2011 the firefighters paid in 14% of gross salary, up from 12%. Since the 2008 plan amendments, the FRRF plan has been changed so that no employee contribution increases will be made in years with no overall pay increases. Consequently the firefighter contribution rate will remain at 14% of their gross salary. Treatment charges This category’s two components partially offset each other – wholesale water costs are going down, but wholesale wastewater charges are going up—the exact opposite of FY2011. After a series of sizable rate increases related to its plant renovation, the DCPCMUD announced an FY2012 increase of only 0.7%, from $2.0142 to $2.0281 per 1,000 gallons. By contrast, one year ago the forecasted FY2012 rate was $2.17, and the FY2011 budget used $2.0751 as a purchases assumption. MUD representatives report that construction delays in the transmission line project outside the plant have caused the temporary respite in rate increases. When coupled with a reduced purchases forecast of 2,135,813,000 gallons, down 1.2% from FY2011, the result is a 3.5% reduction in budgeted water treatment charges. WATER PURCHASES FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 Change $ Change % Rate per 1,000 gallons $1.7828$2.0751$2.0281$0.0470 -2.3% Forecast gallons (000) 2,138,2382,162,3372,135,813-26,433 -1.2% Budgeted purchases $3,812,051$4,486,876$4,331,642-$155,234 -3.5% As such, no retail water rate increase is proposed in the FY2012 budget. The chart on the next page depicts the impact of the MUD plant conversion on wholesale water rates Page 115 of 184 5 The double-digit percentage rate increases are projected to resume next year, so that by FY2014 rates will have risen to $2.57. This is a perfect opportunity to conduct a rate study to integrate the higher rates with issues like conservation incentives and allocation of the retail rate between base amount and consumption charges. City staff plans to propose a formal utility rate study during FY2012. The other major treatment cost item is wastewater treatment, which is provided by the City of Dallas Water Utilities. For FY2012, University Park will pay $2,405,697, up $312,481 from FY2011 charges of $2,093,216. As with water charges, external wastewater charges are the product of two factors— consumption and rate. Compared with one year ago, consumption (monthly winter household water use) rose by 21.4%, from 65,315,000 gallons to 79,294,000. This is multiplied against the proposed rate per 1,000 gallons (up 3.1%) and infiltration/inflow factor (down 8.1%). Because winter month consumption is also the base for determining University Park’s retail charges, City wastewater revenues will also increase in FY2012, from $4,270,261 to $4,504,745. While this increase is less than the rise in treatment charges, the difference is not large enough to warrant a City retail rate increase. Capital project contributions The FY2012 budget continues the City’s successful practice of funding its capital projects on a pay-as- you-go rather than debt basis. As with the prior three years, no increases are proposed for the Utility Fund contribution of $2,195,415 or the General Fund contribution of $3,032,187. These amounts are included in the Transfers Departments in the General and Utility Funds. The budgeted transfers and other sources help fund the City’s Capital Improvements Program (CIP), so that in a given year the amount of project expenditure may be sharply higher or lower than the annual budgeted contribution. The Capital Projects Review Committee will meet with City staff to consider the capital budget for FY2012 and projections for FY2013-2016. Once approved by the City Council by resolution, any subsequent changes to the FY2012 capital budget and five-year CIP must first be reviewed by the Committee before being considered by the City Council. Electricity Electricity consumption has risen over the past three years, as additional meters are installed for fountains $1.21 $1.21 $1.32  $1.78  $2.01 $2.03  $2.49 $2.53 $2.52 $2.57  $0.00  $0.50  $1.00  $1.50  $2.00  $2.50  $3.00  FY07FY08FY09FY10FY11FY12FY13FY14FY15FY16 MUD water rate per 1,000 gallons Page 116 of 184 6 and facilities. The City purchases electricity via its membership in TCAP, the Texas Coalition for Affordable Power. Rates dropped 4% for the year beginning July 2011. Citywide electric costs for the 12 months ended June 30, 2011 totaled $616,506, versus the FY2011 budget of $588,319. For FY2012 the budget includes $627,253 for electricity. Equipment replacement As with the Self-Insurance Fund, the City’s Equipment Services Fund is supported by operating departments, and over time the Fund’s balance has grown. Working capital (current assets minus current liabilities) in the Fund totaled $6,834,564 at the end of FY2010. City departments contribute to the Fund for Garage and Warehouse operations and equipment replacement. This latter item is calculated by dividing the purchase cost of a department’s vehicles by their useful lives. Last year the budget included $495,759 for equipment replacement, which was 80% of the calculated $619,699 amount. The FY2012 budget includes replacement contributions of $540,061, which is 90% of the calculated $600,069 total. Fuel The City is budgeting for $3.25 per gallon for gasoline and $3.45 for diesel, compared with $3.00 and $3.40 last year. Citywide fuel purchases are projected to total $429,991 for FY2011, versus budget of $433,653. For FY2012 the budget includes $436,840 for fuel purchases. DISCUSSION OF TAXES AND UTILITY RATES GENERAL FUND Revenue considerations Non-property tax revenues comprise $11,009,658 of the City’s $26,758,000 General Fund revenue budget. For FY2012, non-property tax revenues are projected to increase $87,200, or 0.8%. This is the first increase since FY2008. Last year budgeted non-property tax revenues decreased $202,945. Sales tax City sales tax revenues have improved consistently since FY2009 and are expected to exceed budget in FY2011. The City’s sales tax consultants have continued to work at submitting requests for retroactive recoveries of taxes distributed to other jurisdictions. The chart below displays recent sales tax history. $3.46 $3.03 $3.03 $3.18 $- $0.50 $1.00 $1.50 $2.00 $2.50 $3.00 $3.50 $4.00 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 Mi l l i o n s Sales tax revenue Budget Actual Page 117 of 184 7 Building permits As expected last year, building permit revenue spiked in FY2011 thanks to the construction of the President George W. Bush Presidential Center. The chart below illustrates the specifics: The building permit revenue budget for the last four years has remained at $1,400,000 and is proposed to remain there for FY2012. Single-family home building activity has begun to improve, and commercial projects should help push the revenue total further. Interest revenues The interest rate climate remains unhelpful to City investment revenues. Two years ago, overnight investment pools were paying 0.33%, and one year ago 0.23%. Today they are paying less than 0.10%, and the City’s overall portfolio yield is about 0.40%. Budgeted General Fund interest revenue is proposed to drop from $300,000 to $265,000. Other revenues One final change should be noted in the General Fund revenues. The category “Other Revenue” last year included a placeholder of $451,077, which represented the amount needed to balance the budget if no other revenues exceeded projections. If this were the case, a transfer from another City fund, like Self- Insurance or Equipment Services, would have been proposed to balance the General Fund. Thanks to the Bush Library building permit and rights of way sales to SMU, this transfer was not needed in FY2011. For FY2012, $180,000 of the original $451,077 has been removed. If General Fund revenues underperform in FY2012, an internal transfer can be considered. Property tax impact For the second time since 1991, the City’s total certified taxable value fell (2.44%), as did the certified market value (4.44%). Single family home values fell 2.66%, with the mathematical average home dropping from $1,120,199 to $1,093,015 in market value. Residential property comprises 83% of the city’s market value but fully 93% of its taxable value. Of that amount, 88% is single family. $- $0.50 $1.00 $1.50 $2.00 $2.50 $3.00 FY2007FY2008FY2009FY2010FY2011FY2012 Mi l l i o n s Building permit revenue Budget Actual Page 118 of 184 8 Single Family Homes comparison, 2009 (FY2010) to 2011 (FY2012) 200920102011CHANGECHANGE% Market value6,518,615,770$ 6,134,207,860$ 5,971,142,920$ (163,064,940)$ -2.66% Taxable value4,926,224,160$ 4,691,822,953$ 4,601,145,414$ (90,677,539)$ -1.93% No. of parcels5,481 5,476 5,463 (13)$ -0.24% Avg. market value1,189,311$ 1,120,199$ 1,093,015$ (27,183)$ -2.43% Avg. taxable value898,782$ 856,797$ 842,238$ (14,560)$ -1.70% Capped value loss172,225,050$ 40,455,480$ 12,008,715$ (28,446,765)$ -70.32% Capped parcels1,425 332 89 (243)$ -73.19% New construction133,904,714$ 72,206,656$ 43,435,074$ (28,771,582)$ -39.85% Over-65 exemption295,000$ 297,000$ 280,000$ (17,000)$ -5.72% Over-65 parcels992 1,031 1,028 (3)$ -0.29% Total over-65 exemp 290,592,374$ 303,384,760$ 285,284,301$ (18,100,459)$ -5.97% The FY2012 budget proposes to maintain the property tax rate at its current level, 27.845 cents per $100 taxable value. This will result in a property tax revenue decrease of $387,311, which will be made up with the expenditure reductions and non-property tax revenue increases discussed earlier. The table below compares this year with the past three: Property tax rate comparison, FY2009 – FY2012 Tax purpose Adopted FY2009 Adopted FY2010 Adopted FY2011 Proposed FY2012 Op. & Maint. 0.26548 0.265480.278450.27845 Debt Service 0.00000 0.000000.000000.00000 Total Tax Rate $0.26548 $0.26548$0.27845$0.27845 The owner of a home whose value decreased by the citywide average would pay $60 less in City property taxes, from $2,495 to $2,435. The owner of an average home with a homestead exemption whose value did not change in assessed value this year would pay $2,495, the same as last year. Property tax levy comparison, FY2009 – FY2012 Adopted FY2009 Adopted FY2010 Adopted FY2011 Proposed FY2012 Assessed Value (Market) $1,183,170$1,189,311$1,120,199$1,093,015 Less 20% Hmstd Exmp (236,634)(237,862)(224,040)(218,603) Taxable Value $946,536$951,449$896,159$842,238 Tax Rate per $100 $0.26548$0.26548$0.27845$0.27845 City Tax Levy $2,513$2,526$2,495$2,435 The proposed $0.27845 rate is below the effective tax rate of $0.286086. This means the City will not have to hold the additional public hearings required by State Truth in Taxation law when taxes increase. UTILITY FUND As described earlier in this memo, the City is fortunate this year in being able to absorb modest increases in treatment costs from DCPCMUD and Dallas Water Utilities. While the FY2012 budget proposes no increases to City retail water or wastewater rates, the projected wholesale water rate increases are a perfect opportunity to reevaluate the City’s retail water and wastewater rate structure. As noted earlier, staff proposes that a formal rate study be conducted during FY2012. This will provide a chance to factor in issues like conservation incentives and allocation of costs between base and consumption elements of the rate. A request for proposal (RFP) process will be used to select a qualified rate consultant and work with City staff, Council, and advisory committees to develop a recommended rate structure for FY2013 and beyond. Page 119 of 184 9 SANITATION FUND As with water and wastewater rates in FY2012, no change is proposed for City sanitation (solid waste and recycling collection) fees. Rates were last increased in FY2009. The proposed FY2012 expenditure budget of $2,868,476 is down 1.63% from FY2011; the revenue budget of $3,070,451 results in a budgeted Fund surplus of $201,975. Consistent with past years, the Sanitation Budget contains a $100,000 placeholder (labeled “Disposal Fees Contingency” in the line-item budget), which is intended to allow accumulation of reserves toward future landfill needs. CONCLUSION The proposed budget is now ready for review by the Employee Benefits, Finance, and Insurance Advisory Committees. Staff proposes the following schedule to satisfy the public hearing and notice requirements for the FY2012 budget’s adoption: Date Day Description August 5 Friday Submit proposed budget to City Council and file with City Secretary August 23 Tuesday Receive staff briefing on budget and hold public hearing September 6 Tuesday Hold public hearing and adopt budget and tax rate October 1 Saturday New budget takes effect Staff looks forward to meeting with the City Council and advisory committees to discuss the budget in more detail. We will be happy to provide any additional information that will be helpful during your consideration. Page 120 of 184 CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS FY2012 PROPOSED BUDGET BY FUND AND DEPARTMENT 8/5/2011 Fund / Org Unit / Department FY2010 Adopted Budget FY2011 Adopted Budget FY2012 Proposed Budget $ Change% Change GENERAL FUND Revenues 01-11 REVENUES$26,809,979$27,058,111$26,758,000 ($300,111)-1.11% Total Revenues$26,809,979$27,058,111$26,758,000 ($300,111)-1.12% Expenditures 01-02 EXECUTIVE$1,213,408 $1,209,006$1,187,135 ($21,871)-1.81% 01-03 FINANCE1,098,754 1,100,8501,059,604 (41,246)-3.75% 01-04 HUMAN RESOURCES368,854 374,810363,849 (10,961)-2.92% 01-05 INFORMATION SERVICES923,209 982,336996,662 14,3261.46% 01-10 COURT286,434 319,960331,720 11,7603.68% 01-19 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT1,018,781 1,028,7451,016,899 (11,846)-1.15% 01-20 ENGINEERING862,540 759,212744,212 (15,000)-1.98% 01-25 TRAFFIC885,109 864,221848,934 (15,287)-1.77% 01-35 FACILITY MAINTENANCE743,556 774,247755,293 (18,954)-2.45% 01-40 FIRE5,004,667 5,096,1364,860,342 (235,794)-4.63% 01-50 POLICE6,459,559 6,701,7286,666,922 (34,806)-0.52% 01-70 PARKS2,803,238 2,797,9042,834,510 36,6061.31% 01-75 SWIMMING POOL233,720 220,198269,583 49,38522.43% 01-80 STREETS1,869,029 1,796,5711,756,234 (40,337)-2.25% 01-85 TRANSFERS3,032,1873,032,1873,032,18700.00% Total Expenditures$26,803,045$27,058,111$26,724,086 ($334,025)-1.23% General Fund Surplus/(Deficit)$6,934$0$33,914$33,914 UTILITY FUND Revenues 02-11 REVENUES$12,888,14113,269,089$ $13,445,004$175,9151.33% Total Revenues$12,888,141$13,269,08913,445,004$ $175,9151.36% Expenditures 02-21 UTILITY OFFICE$7,397,795 $7,741,108$7,882,997 $141,8891.83% 02-22 UTILITIES3,230,158 3,245,5023,266,306 20,8040.64% 02-23 STORM WATER0 86,95090,450 3,5004.03% 02-85 TRANSFERS2,195,4152,195,4152,195,415$00.00% Total Expenditures$12,823,368$13,268,975$13,435,168$166,1931.30% Utility Fund Surplus/(Deficit)$64,773$114$9,836$9,722 SANITATION FUND Revenues 04-11 REVENUES$3,087,251$3,070,451$3,070,451$00.00% Total Revenues$3,087,251$3,070,451$3,070,451$00.00% Expenditures 04-60 SANITATION$2,887,655$2,915,903$2,868,476 ($47,427)-1.63% Total Expenditures$2,887,655$2,915,903$2,868,476 ($47,427)-1.64% Sanitation Fund Surplus/(Deficit)$199,596$154,548$201,975$47,427 TOTAL REVENUES $42,785,371$43,397,651$43,273,455 ($124,196)-0.29% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 42,514,06843,242,98943,027,730 ($215,259)-0.51% TOTAL SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)$271,303$154,662$245,725$91,063 S:\FINANCE\BUDGET\BUDGET12\FY2012 Proposed Budget by Dept.xlsx SUMMARY BY FUND AND DEPT 8/5/2011 4:08 PM PAGE 1 OF 49Page 121 of 184 CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS FY2012 PROPOSED BUDGET PROPERTY TAX IMPACT 8/5/2011 FY2010FY2011FY2012 ADOPTEDADOPTEDPROPOSEDDOLLARPERCENT BUDGETBUDGETBUDGETCHANGECHANGE TOTAL CERTIFIED TAXABLE VALUE 5,986,007,682$ 5,707,112,954$ 5,568,088,524$ (139,024,430)$ -2.44% TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUES NEEDED:26,809,979$ 27,058,111$ 26,758,000$ (300,111)$ -1.11% #DIV/0! NON PROPERTY TAX REVENUE #DIV/0! Sales tax3,028,851$ 3,028,851$ 3,178,851$ 150,000$ 4.95% Franchise fees2,195,000 1,910,000 1,910,000 -$ 0.00% Building permits1,400,000 1,400,000 1,400,000 -$ 0.00% Traffic/parking fines516,000 516,000 531,000 15,000$ 2.91% Service charges915,475 1,036,530 1,042,730 6,200$ 0.60% Direct alarm monitoring fees700,000 731,000 819,000 88,000$ 12.04% Interest income375,000 300,000 265,000 (35,000)$ -11.67% Utility Fund contribution600,000 600,000 600,000 -$ 0.00% Miscellaneous944,000 1,400,077 1,263,077 (137,000)$ -9.79% TOTAL NON PROPERTY TAX REV.10,674,326$ 10,922,458$ 11,009,658$ 87,200$ 0.80% PROPERTY TAX REVENUE Operations & Maintenance (O&M) need15,891,653$ 15,891,653$ 15,504,342$ (387,311)$ -2.44% Penalty/interest & attorney's fees145,000 145,000 145,000 -$ 0.00% Delinquent (prior years) taxes99,000 99,000 99,000 -$ 0.00% TOTAL PROP TAX OP REQUEST16,135,653$ 16,135,653$ 15,748,342$ (387,311)$ -2.40% REVENUES LESS EXPENDITURES - - - DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENT -$ -$ -$ -$ #DIV/0! PROPERTY TAX RATE Operations & Maintenance (O&M)0.26548$ 0.27845$ 0.27845$ (0)$ 0.00% Debt Service- - - -$ #DIV/0! Total Property Tax Rate per $1000.26548$ 0.27845$ 0.27845$ (0.00000)$ 0.00% IMPACT ON HOMEOWNER Average single-family market value1,189,311$ 1,120,199$ 1,093,015$ (27,183)$ -2.43% Less: 20% homestead exemption(237,862) (224,040)$ (218,603)$ 5,437$ -2.43% Average single-family taxable value951,449 896,159 874,412 (21,747)$ -2.43% -$ Tax levy2,526$ 2,495$ 2,435$ (61)$ -2.43% FILENAME: FY2012 Proposed Budget by Dept.xlsx PROP TAX IMPACT LAST PRINTED: 8/5/2011 4:08 PM PAGE 2 OF 49Page 122 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 01 - 1 1 R E V E N U E S G E N E R A L F U N D LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 30 0 0 T A X E S - C U R R E N T Y E A R $ 1 5 , 7 5 5 , 6 1 9 $ 1 5 , 8 9 1 , 6 5 3 $ 1 5 , 5 0 4 , 3 4 2 - $ 3 8 7 , 3 1 1 - 2 . 4 % SU B T O T A L C U R R E N T T A X E S $ 1 5 , 7 5 5 , 6 1 9 $ 1 5 , 8 9 1 , 6 5 3 $ 1 5 , 5 0 4 , 3 4 2 - $ 3 8 7 , 3 1 1 - 2 . 4 % 30 4 7 D E L I N Q U E N T T A X E S - 1 9 9 7 ($ 4 5 7 ) $5 0 0 $ 0 - $ 5 0 0 - 1 0 0 . 0 % 30 4 8 D E L I N Q U E N T T A X E S - 1 9 9 8 $ 5 4 9 $ 5 0 0 $ 0 - $ 5 0 0 - 1 0 0 . 0 % 30 4 9 D E L I N Q U E N T T A X E S - 1 9 9 9 $ 1 , 1 8 3 $ 5 0 0 $ 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 5 0 D E L I N Q U E N T T A X E S - 2 0 0 0 $ 2 8 2 $ 5 0 0 $ 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 5 1 D E L I N Q U E N T T A X E S - 2 0 0 1 $ 1 , 9 8 2 $ 5 0 0 $ 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 5 2 D E L I N Q U E N T T A X E S - 2 0 0 2 $ 1 , 1 4 6 $ 5 0 0 $ 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 5 3 D E L I N Q U E N T T A X E S - 2 0 0 3 $ 1 , 9 6 6 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 5 0 0 - $ 5 0 0 - 5 0 . 0 % 30 5 4 D E L I N Q U E N T T A X E S - 2 0 0 4 $ 1 , 8 1 0 $ 2 , 5 0 0 $ 5 0 0 - $ 2 , 0 0 0 - 8 0 . 0 % 30 5 5 D E L I N Q U E N T T A X E S - 2 0 0 5 $ 2 1 $ 2 , 5 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 - $ 1 , 5 0 0 - 6 0 . 0 % 30 5 6 D E L I N Q U E N T T A X E S - 2 0 0 6 $ 3 , 7 3 6 $ 5 , 0 0 0 $ 2 , 5 0 0 - $ 2 , 5 0 0 - 5 0 . 0 % 30 5 7 D E L I N Q U E N T T A X E S - 2 0 0 7 $ 7 , 5 9 9 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 $ 2 , 5 0 0 - $ 7 , 5 0 0 - 7 5 . 0 % 30 5 8 D E L I N Q U E N T T A X E S - 2 0 0 8 $ 3 5 , 9 9 5 $ 7 5 , 0 0 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 - $ 7 0 , 0 0 0 - 9 3 . 3 % 30 5 9 D E L I N Q U E N T T A X E S - 2 0 0 9 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 # D I V / 0 ! 30 5 9 . 1 D E L I N Q U E N T T A X E S - 2 0 1 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 7 5 , 0 0 0 $ 7 5 , 0 0 0 # D I V / 0 ! 30 9 2 D E L I N Q U E N T T A X E S - 1 9 9 2 $ 6 0 7 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 30 9 3 D E L I N Q U E N T T A X E S - 1 9 9 3 $ 8 7 7 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 30 9 4 D E L I N Q U E N T T A X E S - 1 9 9 4 $ 7 6 9 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 30 9 5 D E L I N Q U E N T T A X E S - 1 9 9 5 $ 5 0 6 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 30 9 6 D E L I N Q U E N T T A X E S - 1 9 9 6 $ 6 7 3 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! SU B T O T A L D E L I N Q U E N T T A X E S $ 5 9 , 2 4 4 $ 9 9 , 0 0 0 $ 9 9 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 9 8 P E N A L T Y / I N T E R E S T O N T A X E S $ 1 2 8 , 0 3 4 $ 1 1 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 1 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 9 9 A T T O R N E Y F E E S - T A X E S $ 3 1 , 2 1 6 $ 3 5 , 0 0 0 $ 3 5 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % SU B T O T A L P E N A L T Y & I N T E R E S T $ 1 5 9 , 2 5 0 $ 1 4 5 , 0 0 0 $ 1 4 5 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 31 0 9 U T I L I T Y F U N D C O N T R I B U T I O N $ 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % SU B T O T A L U F C O N T R I B U T I O N $ 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 31 5 0 C I T Y S A L E S T A X $ 3 , 1 2 1 , 4 4 3 $ 3 , 0 2 8 , 8 5 1 $ 3 , 1 7 8 , 8 5 1 $ 1 5 0 , 0 0 0 5 . 0 % 01 - 1 1 R E V E N U E G F F Y 2 0 1 2 PAGE 3 OF 49Page 123 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 01 - 1 1 R E V E N U E S G E N E R A L F U N D LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % SU B T O T A L S A L E S T A X $ 3 , 1 2 1 , 4 4 3 $ 3 , 0 2 8 , 8 5 1 $ 3 , 1 7 8 , 8 5 1 $ 1 5 0 , 0 0 0 5 . 0 % 33 0 0 B U I L D I N G P E R M I T S $ 9 4 8 , 1 2 8 $ 1 , 4 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 4 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % SU B T O T A L B U I L D I N G P E R M I T S $ 9 4 8 , 1 2 8 $ 1 , 4 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 4 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 32 0 0 T U E L E C T R I C $ 9 9 2 , 9 8 2 $ 1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 32 0 2 T E L E P H O N E F R A N C H I S E $ 2 3 4 , 9 7 4 $ 3 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 3 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 32 0 3 L O N E S T A R G A S $ 4 9 9 , 5 3 7 $ 4 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 4 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 32 0 4 C A B L E F R A N C H I S E $ 3 2 1 , 8 6 2 $ 2 1 0 , 0 0 0 $ 2 1 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % SU B T O T A L F R A N C H I S E F E E S $ 2 , 0 4 9 , 3 5 5 $ 1 , 9 1 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 9 1 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 34 0 0 T R A F F I C F I N E S $ 3 2 7 , 0 8 3 $ 3 4 6 , 0 0 0 $ 3 4 6 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 34 0 3 C R O S S ' G G U A R D ( C H I L D S F T Y ) $ 1 9 , 3 5 0 $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 34 0 4 P A R K I N G T I C K E T S $ 1 7 8 , 0 2 4 $ 1 5 5 , 0 0 0 $ 1 7 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 9 . 7 % SU B T O T A L F I N E S $ 5 2 4 , 4 5 7 $ 5 1 6 , 0 0 0 $ 5 3 1 , 0 0 0 $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 2 . 9 % 33 0 2 C O N T R A C T O R S L I C N S E / P E R M I T $ 2 6 , 7 2 9 $ 4 0 , 0 0 0 $ 4 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 33 0 3 A N I M A L C O N T R O L T A G S / F E E S $ 1 3 , 6 8 8 $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 33 0 4 H E A L T H / F O O D P E R M I T $ 2 4 , 2 1 5 $ 2 0 , 0 0 0 $ 2 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 33 0 5 F I L M I N G P E R M I T S $ 3 , 7 5 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 33 0 6 F I R E P E R M I T S / R E V E N U E $ 2 3 , 9 6 5 $ 1 8 , 8 0 0 $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 $ 6 , 2 0 0 3 3 . 0 % 33 0 8 P O L I C E R E V E N U E $ 8 7 , 5 2 0 $ 9 7 , 9 1 1 $ 9 7 , 9 1 1 $ 0 0 . 0 % 34 0 1 W R E C K E R F E E S $ 1 , 4 8 0 $ 2 , 1 6 0 $ 2 , 1 6 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 34 0 5 A L A R M B I L L I N G $ 3 7 , 5 8 4 $ 1 3 5 , 9 8 4 $ 1 3 5 , 9 8 4 $ 0 0 . 0 % 34 0 6 F A L S E A L A R M F E E S $ 3 , 8 2 0 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 34 0 8 A M B U L A N C E F E E S $ 3 9 1 , 1 7 7 $ 4 4 4 , 6 7 5 $ 4 4 4 , 6 7 5 $ 0 0 . 0 % 34 0 9 9 1 1 S E R V I C E F E E S $ 1 0 3 , 8 1 3 $ 1 3 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 0 9 , 0 0 0 - $ 2 1 , 0 0 0 - 1 6 . 2 % 34 1 0 9 1 1 S E R V I C E F E E S - W I R E L E S S $ 1 5 3 , 9 0 3 $ 9 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 1 1 , 0 0 0 $ 2 1 , 0 0 0 2 3 . 3 % 34 1 1 C A P I A S W A R R A N T R E V E N U E $ 5 , 2 4 7 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 34 1 2 R E D L I G H T C A M E R A R E V E N U E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 35 3 5 U T I L I T Y C A P O F F $ 1 0 , 3 0 0 $ 3 0 , 0 0 0 $ 3 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % SU B T O T A L S E R V I C E C H A R G E S $ 8 8 7 , 1 9 1 $ 1 , 0 3 6 , 5 3 0 $ 1 , 0 4 2 , 7 3 0 $ 6 , 2 0 0 0 . 6 % 01 - 1 1 R E V E N U E G F F Y 2 0 1 2 PAGE 4 OF 49Page 124 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 01 - 1 1 R E V E N U E S G E N E R A L F U N D LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 34 9 9 D I R E C T A L A R M R E V E N U E $ 7 6 7 , 4 8 4 $ 7 3 1 , 0 0 0 $ 8 1 9 , 0 0 0 $ 8 8 , 0 0 0 1 2 . 0 % SU B T O T A L D I R E C T A L A R M $ 7 6 7 , 4 8 4 $ 7 3 1 , 0 0 0 $ 8 1 9 , 0 0 0 $ 8 8 , 0 0 0 1 2 . 0 % 39 0 0 I N T E R E S T E A R N I N G S $ 3 0 2 , 6 1 9 $ 3 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 2 6 5 , 0 0 0 - $ 3 5 , 0 0 0 - 1 1 . 7 % SU B T O T A L I N T E R E S T E A R N I N G S $ 3 0 2 , 6 1 9 $ 3 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 2 6 5 , 0 0 0 - $ 3 5 , 0 0 0 - 1 1 . 7 % 31 5 5 M I X E D B E V E R A G E T A X $ 1 0 6 , 8 9 3 $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 0 8 , 0 0 0 $ 8 , 0 0 0 8 . 0 % 35 1 0 T E N N I S P E R M I T S $ 5 3 , 1 0 5 $ 2 4 , 0 0 0 $ 2 4 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 35 1 1 S W I M P O O L P E R M I T - R E S I D E N T $ 1 8 3 , 7 8 0 $ 1 6 5 , 0 0 0 $ 1 6 5 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 35 1 2 S W I M P O O L P E R M I T - N O N R E S $ 8 , 6 6 0 $ 7 , 0 0 0 $ 7 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 35 1 3 S W I M P O O L P R M T S G A T E R C P T $ 1 0 5 , 8 0 2 $ 6 5 , 0 0 0 $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 3 5 , 0 0 0 5 3 . 8 % 35 1 4 S W I M M I N G P O O L C O N C E S S I O N S $ 7 , 5 0 0 $ 6 , 0 0 0 $ 6 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 35 1 5 S W I M L E S S O N S $ 1 , 5 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 37 3 0 P U B L I C S A F E T Y G R A N T S / R E V $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 37 4 0 P O L I C E G R A N T S / D O N A T I O N S $ 4 , 4 3 0 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 37 4 5 F I R E G R A N T S / D O N A T I O N S $ 1 0 , 9 7 9 $ 5 , 0 0 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 38 5 0 A U C T I O N / S A L E O F E Q U I P M E N T $ 3 , 3 0 6 $ 2 1 , 0 0 0 $ 2 1 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 39 0 1 R E N T $ 4 1 , 5 9 5 $ 4 0 , 0 0 0 $ 4 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 39 1 1 C O P I E S $ 6 7 8 $ 4 , 0 0 0 $ 4 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 39 2 0 P A Y M E N T I N L I E U O F T A X E S $ 1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 39 9 9 O T H E R R E V E N U E ($ 1 1 , 9 9 4 ) $9 5 1 , 0 7 7 $ 7 7 1 , 0 7 7 - $ 1 8 0 , 0 0 0 - 1 8 . 9 % SU B T O T A L O T H E R R E V E N U E $ 1 , 5 1 6 , 2 3 4 $ 1 , 4 0 0 , 0 7 7 $ 1 , 2 6 3 , 0 7 7 - $ 1 3 7 , 0 0 0 - 9 . 8 % TO T A L R E V E N U E S - G E N E R A L F U N D $ 2 6 , 6 9 1 , 0 2 4 $ 2 7 , 0 5 8 , 1 1 1 $ 2 6 , 7 5 8 , 0 0 0 - $ 3 0 0 , 1 1 1 - 1 . 1 % 01 - 1 1 R E V E N U E G F F Y 2 0 1 2 PAGE 5 OF 49Page 125 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 01 - 0 2 E X E C U T I V E LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 10 0 1 R E G U L A R E A R N I N G S $ 4 3 4 , 7 5 6 $ 4 5 2 , 5 4 2 $ 4 5 7 , 6 6 7 $ 5 , 1 2 5 1 . 1 % 10 0 2 O V E R T I M E E A R N I N G S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 10 0 5 L O N G E V I T Y P A Y $ 1 , 9 9 5 $ 2 , 5 6 4 $ 2 , 8 4 8 $ 2 8 4 1 1 . 1 % 10 0 7 C A R A L L O W A N C E $ 7 , 2 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 11 1 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E F . I . C . A . $ 2 7 , 8 8 9 $ 3 0 , 0 2 3 $ 3 0 , 5 3 6 $ 5 1 3 1 . 7 % 11 2 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E T . M . R . S . $ 6 0 , 9 8 1 $ 6 1 , 4 9 8 $ 4 8 , 1 9 8 - $ 1 3 , 3 0 0 - 2 1 . 6 % 11 2 7 R E T I R E M E N T S U P P L E M E N T A L $ 4 0 , 0 0 0 $ 4 0 , 0 0 0 $ 4 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 11 3 0 I N S U R A N C E - E M P L O Y E E L I F E $ 2 , 6 7 8 $ 3 , 0 4 8 $ 2 , 9 7 9 - $ 6 9 - 2 . 3 % 11 3 1 I N S U R A N C E - W O R K M E N S C O M P $ 6 1 6 $ 5 9 5 $ 6 0 8 $ 1 3 2 . 2 % 11 3 2 I N S U R A N C E - U N E M P L O Y M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 3 5 H E A L T H I N S U R A N C E $ 5 5 , 0 3 5 $ 5 4 , 0 0 0 $ 4 5 , 0 0 0 - $ 9 , 0 0 0 - 1 6 . 7 % SA L A R I E S & B E N E F I T S $ 6 3 1 , 1 5 0 $ 6 5 1 , 4 7 0 $ 6 3 5 , 0 3 6 - $ 1 6 , 4 3 4 - 2 . 5 % 21 0 0 O F F I C E S U P P L I E S $ 2 , 2 5 2 $ 3 , 8 2 1 $ 3 , 3 2 1 - $ 5 0 0 - 1 3 . 1 % 23 1 8 C O M P U T E R S U P P L I E S $ 2 2 5 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % SU P P L I E S $ 2 , 4 7 7 $ 4 , 8 2 1 $ 4 , 3 2 1 - $ 5 0 0 - 1 0 . 4 % 30 0 3 B O A R D M E E T I N G S $ 8 , 7 0 1 $ 1 3 , 5 6 0 $ 1 3 , 5 6 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 1 0 P O S T A G E $ 2 , 4 4 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 1 4 P U B L I C A T I O N S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 30 6 0 P R O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 3 6 1 , 2 7 3 $ 3 7 5 , 3 1 0 $ 3 8 6 , 0 5 0 $ 1 0 , 7 4 0 2 . 9 % 30 6 3 P R O G R A M M I N G / M A I N T E N A N C E $ 2 4 , 7 4 3 $ 3 1 , 4 7 3 $ 3 1 , 6 7 4 $ 2 0 1 0 . 6 % 31 1 3 P R I N T I N G $ 1 9 , 1 2 9 $ 2 0 , 3 1 6 $ 2 0 , 8 2 6 $ 5 1 0 2 . 5 % PR O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 4 1 6 , 2 8 6 $ 4 4 2 , 6 5 9 $ 4 5 4 , 1 1 0 $ 1 1 , 4 5 1 2 . 6 % 41 1 0 H E A T , L I G H T , W A T E R U T I L $ 1 0 , 9 3 9 $ 1 1 , 7 5 7 $ 1 2 , 3 2 0 $ 5 6 3 4 . 8 % 41 2 0 T E L E P H O N E S E R V I C E $ 6 , 0 3 4 $ 5 , 7 9 4 $ 5 , 7 9 4 $ 0 0 . 0 % UT I L I T I E S $ 1 6 , 9 7 3 $ 1 7 , 5 5 1 $ 1 8 , 1 1 4 $ 5 6 3 3 . 2 % 55 0 6 I N S U R A N C E - G E N E R A L L I A B I L I T Y $ 9 1 5 $ 9 1 5 $ 3 2 9 - $ 5 8 6 - 6 4 . 0 % 55 1 4 I N S U R A N C E - P U B L . O F F L L I A B $ 4 5 , 0 0 0 $ 4 5 , 0 0 0 $ 2 8 , 0 0 0 - $ 1 7 , 0 0 0 - 3 7 . 8 % 55 1 6 B O N D S - O F F I C A L S & E M P L O Y E E $ 2 0 0 $ 2 0 0 $ 2 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 01 - 0 2 E X E C U T I V E PAGE6 OF 49 Page 126 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 01 - 0 2 E X E C U T I V E LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % IN S U R A N C E $ 4 6 , 1 1 5 $ 4 6 , 1 1 5 $ 2 8 , 5 2 9 - $ 1 7 , 5 8 6 - 3 8 . 1 % 62 0 0 E Q U I P R E P A I R S / N O N V E H I C L E $ 0 $ 6 0 0 $ 6 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % OU T S I D E S E R V I C E S $ 0 $ 6 0 0 $ 6 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 71 5 0 D U E S & S U B S C R I P T I O N S $ 1 4 , 8 5 6 $ 1 4 , 1 7 0 $ 1 4 , 1 7 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 71 7 0 T R A V E L E X P E N S E $ 8 , 5 8 6 $ 1 0 , 0 3 0 $ 9 , 2 6 0 - $ 7 7 0 - 7 . 7 % 72 0 1 C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T B E L O W $ 5 0 $1 , 6 1 8 $ 2 , 7 0 0 $ 5 0 0 - $ 2 , 2 0 0 - 8 1 . 5 % 72 0 2 M I C R O C O M P U T E R S O F T W A R E $ 2 6 , 4 7 3 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 72 2 1 O T H E R E X P E N S E $ 3 , 7 4 1 $ 4 , 6 5 0 $ 4 , 6 5 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 72 3 5 Y O U T H A D V I S O R Y C O M M I S S I O N E X P $1 , 4 9 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 72 4 0 T U I T I O N & T R A I N I N G $ 2 , 5 0 9 $ 6 , 2 4 0 $ 4 , 8 4 5 - $ 1 , 3 9 5 - 2 2 . 4 % 72 4 5 T U I T I O N R E I M B U R S E M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 74 3 2 E L E C T I O N S $ 4 , 5 9 7 $ 5 , 0 0 0 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 % 74 7 5 I M P R O V E M E N T S - - U N D E R $ 5 0 0 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! OT H E R $ 6 3 , 8 7 0 $ 4 5 , 2 9 0 $ 4 5 , 9 2 5 $ 6 3 5 1 . 4 % 91 0 0 O F F I C E E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 5 0 0 $ 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 92 0 1 M I C R O C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 99 1 0 O F F I C E F U R N I T U R E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! CA P I T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S $ 0 $ 5 0 0 $ 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % TO T A L E X E C U T I V E $ 1 , 1 7 6 , 8 7 1 $ 1 , 2 0 9 , 0 0 6 $ 1 , 1 8 7 , 1 3 5 - $ 2 1 , 8 7 1 - 1 . 8 % 01 - 0 2 E X E C U T I V E PAGE7 OF 49 Page 127 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 01 - 0 3 F I N A N C E LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 10 0 1 R E G U L A R E A R N I N G S $ 5 5 1 , 9 1 5 $ 5 7 8 , 1 3 6 $ 5 6 9 , 6 7 2 - $ 8 , 4 6 4 -1.5% 10 0 2 O V E R T I M E E A R N I N G S $ 7 9 1 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 10 0 5 L O N G E V I T Y P A Y $ 4 , 9 1 7 $ 5 , 2 4 4 $ 5 , 5 8 1 $ 3 3 7 6 . 4 % 10 0 7 C A R A L L O W A N C E $ 7 , 2 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 11 1 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E F . I . C . A . $ 3 9 , 1 4 0 $ 4 2 , 1 8 3 $ 4 1 , 6 5 9 - $ 5 2 4 - 1 . 2 % 11 2 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E T . M . R . S . $ 7 8 , 6 8 5 $ 7 8 , 5 6 2 $ 6 1 , 1 5 6 - $ 1 7 , 4 0 6 - 2 2 . 2 % 11 3 0 I N S U R A N C E - E M P L O Y E E L I F E $ 3 , 6 1 7 $ 3 , 8 9 2 $ 3 , 8 4 5 - $ 4 7 - 1 . 2 % 11 3 1 I N S U R A N C E - W O R K M E N S C O M P $ 7 2 5 $ 7 6 0 $ 7 5 7 - $ 3 - 0 . 4 % 11 3 2 I N S U R A N C E - U N E M P L O Y M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 3 5 H E A L T H I N S U R A N C E $ 6 6 , 0 4 2 $ 6 3 , 0 0 0 $ 5 4 , 0 0 0 - $ 9 , 0 0 0 - 1 4 . 3 % SA L A R I E S & B E N E F I T S $ 7 5 3 , 0 3 2 $ 7 7 8 , 9 7 7 $ 7 4 3 , 8 7 0 - $ 3 5 , 1 0 7 - 4 . 5 % 20 2 9 C L O T H I N G A L L O W A N C E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 21 0 0 O F F I C E S U P P L I E S $ 5 , 9 4 0 $ 5 , 5 5 0 $ 5 , 5 5 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 23 1 8 C O M P U T E R S U P P L I E S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! SU P P L I E S $ 5 , 9 4 0 $ 5 , 5 5 0 $ 5 , 5 5 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 0 7 D E L I N Q U E N T T A X A T T O R N E Y $ 3 1 , 2 1 6 $ 2 9 , 0 0 0 $ 2 9 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 1 0 P O S T A G E $ 2 , 0 8 4 $ 2 , 1 0 0 $ 2 , 1 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 6 0 P R O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 1 0 6 , 0 7 0 $ 9 6 , 0 9 8 $ 8 6 , 5 8 0 - $ 9 , 5 1 8 - 9 . 9 % 30 6 3 P R O G R A M M I N G / M A I N T E N A N C E $ 4 5 , 6 4 9 $ 4 3 , 1 1 6 $ 3 8 , 3 9 6 - $ 4 , 7 2 0 - 1 0 . 9 % 31 1 3 P R I N T I N G $ 4 , 0 3 8 $ 5 , 6 1 5 $ 6 , 3 5 0 $ 7 3 5 1 3 . 1 % 31 4 1 D A L L A S C O T A X C O L L S E R V $ 1 1 , 2 9 4 $ 1 1 , 4 2 0 $ 1 1 , 4 2 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 31 4 5 C E N T R A L A P P R A I S A L D I S T R I C $ 7 4 , 7 6 0 $ 7 6 , 4 1 1 $ 7 7 , 7 4 5 $ 1 , 3 3 4 1 . 7 % PR O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 2 7 5 , 1 1 1 $ 2 6 3 , 7 6 0 $ 2 5 1 , 5 9 1 - $ 1 2 , 1 6 9 - 4 . 6 % 41 1 0 H E A T , L I G H T , W A T E R U T I L $ 8 , 1 3 2 $ 8 , 7 1 6 $ 9 , 1 4 4 $ 4 2 8 4 . 9 % 41 2 0 T E L E P H O N E S E R V I C E $ 5 , 0 9 7 $ 5 , 2 8 8 $ 5 , 2 8 8 $ 0 0 . 0 % UT I L I T I E S $ 1 3 , 2 2 9 $ 1 4 , 0 0 4 $ 1 4 , 4 3 2 $ 4 2 8 3 . 1 % 55 0 6 I N S U R A N C E - G E N E R A L L I A B I L I T Y $ 1 , 2 6 5 $ 1 , 2 6 5 $ 4 5 6 - $ 8 0 9 - 6 4 . 0 % 55 1 0 I N S U R A N C E - B L D G & C O N T E N T S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 01 - 0 3 F I N A N C E PAGE 8 OF 49Page 128 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 01 - 0 3 F I N A N C E LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 55 2 0 R I S K , L O S S , C L A I M M G M T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! IN S U R A N C E $ 1 , 2 6 5 $ 1 , 2 6 5 $ 4 5 6 - $ 8 0 9 - 6 4 . 0 % 62 0 0 E Q U I P R E P A I R S / N O N V E H I C L E $ 9 7 9 $ 1 , 0 1 0 $ 1 , 0 1 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % OU T S I D E S E R V I C E S $ 9 7 9 $ 1 , 0 1 0 $ 1 , 0 1 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 71 5 0 D U E S & S U B S C R I P T I O N S $ 1 3 , 7 2 5 $ 9 , 0 6 6 $ 8 , 5 3 5 - $ 5 3 1 - 5 . 9 % 71 7 0 T R A V E L E X P E N S E $ 9 , 5 5 8 $ 1 0 , 6 1 5 $ 1 1 , 2 5 5 $ 6 4 0 6 . 0 % 72 0 1 C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T B E L O W $ 5 0 $1 , 1 6 1 $ 6 , 5 0 0 $ 8 , 0 9 7 $ 1 , 5 9 7 2 4 . 6 % 72 0 2 M I C R O C O M P U T E R S O F T W A R E $ 2 , 7 5 5 $ 4 5 8 $ 4 , 1 7 8 $ 3 , 7 2 0 8 1 2 . 2 % 72 2 1 O T H E R E X P E N S E $ 5 , 0 1 2 $ 5 , 7 1 5 $ 5 , 9 1 5 $ 2 0 0 3 . 5 % 72 4 0 T U I T I O N & T R A I N I N G $ 6 , 7 8 7 $ 3 , 9 3 0 $ 4 , 7 1 5 $ 7 8 5 2 0 . 0 % 74 7 5 I M P R O V E M E N T S - U N D E R $ 5 0 0 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! OT H E R $ 3 8 , 9 9 8 $ 3 6 , 2 8 4 $ 4 2 , 6 9 5 $ 6 , 4 1 1 1 7 . 7 % 90 0 0 C A P I T A L E Q U I P M E N T R E P L A C E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 91 0 0 O F F I C E E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 92 0 1 M I C R O C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 99 1 0 O F F I C E F U R N I T U R E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! CA P I T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! TO T A L F I N A N C E $ 1 , 0 8 8 , 5 5 4 $ 1 , 1 0 0 , 8 5 0 $ 1 , 0 5 9 , 6 0 4 - $ 4 1 , 2 4 6 - 3 . 7 % 01 - 0 3 F I N A N C E PAGE 9 OF 49Page 129 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 01 - 0 4 H U M A N R E S O U R C E S LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 10 0 1 R E G U L A R E A R N I N G S $ 1 7 7 , 9 5 4 $ 1 8 3 , 3 9 8 $ 1 8 3 , 3 8 8 - $ 1 0 0 . 0 % 10 0 2 O V E R T I M E E A R N I N G S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 10 0 5 L O N G E V I T Y P A Y $ 1 , 6 8 5 $ 1 , 7 8 0 $ 1 , 8 7 4 $ 9 4 5 . 3 % 10 0 7 C A R A L L O W A N C E $ 7 , 2 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 10 0 9 C E L L P H O N E A L L O W A N C E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 1 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E F . I . C . A . $ 1 2 , 7 2 6 $ 1 2 , 7 1 6 $ 1 2 , 8 2 4 $ 1 0 8 0 . 8 % 11 2 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E T . M . R . S . $ 2 6 , 1 9 1 $ 2 5 , 5 8 2 $ 2 0 , 2 0 8 - $ 5 , 3 7 4 - 2 1 . 0 % 11 3 0 I N S U R A N C E - E M P L O Y E E L I F E $ 1 , 1 6 5 $ 1 , 2 3 5 $ 1 , 2 1 5 - $ 2 0 - 1 . 6 % 11 3 1 I N S U R A N C E - W O R K M E N S C O M P $ 2 3 3 $ 2 4 1 $ 2 5 1 $ 1 0 4 . 1 % 11 3 2 I N S U R A N C E - U N E M P L O Y M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 3 5 H E A L T H I N S U R A N C E $ 2 2 , 0 1 4 $ 1 8 , 0 0 0 $ 1 8 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % SA L A R I E S & B E N E F I T S $ 2 4 9 , 1 6 8 $ 2 5 0 , 1 5 1 $ 2 4 4 , 9 6 0 - $ 5 , 1 9 1 - 2 . 1 % 20 2 9 C L O T H I N G A L L O W A N C E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 21 0 0 O F F I C E S U P P L I E S $ 1 , 0 8 3 $ 1 , 4 5 0 $ 1 , 4 5 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 23 1 8 C O M P U T E R S U P P L I E S $ 3 5 0 $ 7 5 0 $ 7 5 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % SU P P L I E S $ 1 , 4 3 3 $ 2 , 2 0 0 $ 2 , 2 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 1 0 P O S T A G E $ 3 3 0 $ 3 4 8 $ 3 4 8 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 6 0 P R O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 5 , 4 7 6 $ 3 0 , 6 0 0 $ 3 0 , 4 6 0 - $ 1 4 0 - 0 . 5 % 30 6 3 P R O G R A M M I N G / M A I N T E N A N C E $ 1 , 1 8 4 $ 9 , 8 1 8 $ 9 , 1 7 4 - $ 6 4 4 - 6 . 6 % 31 1 3 P R I N T I N G $ 8 2 7 $ 1 0 0 $ 1 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % PR O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 7 , 8 1 7 $ 4 0 , 8 6 6 $ 4 0 , 0 8 2 - $ 7 8 4 - 1 . 9 % 41 1 0 H E A T , L I G H T , W A T E R U T I L $ 4 , 6 8 8 $ 5 , 0 3 9 $ 5 , 2 8 0 $ 2 4 1 4 . 8 % 41 2 0 T E L E P H O N E S E R V I C E $ 3 , 1 6 3 $ 3 , 0 8 2 $ 3 , 0 8 2 $ 0 0 . 0 % UT I L I T I E S $ 7 , 8 5 1 $ 8 , 1 2 1 $ 8 , 3 6 2 $ 2 4 1 3 . 0 % 55 0 6 I N S U R A N C E - G E N E R A L L I A B I L I T Y $ 4 6 7 $ 4 6 7 $ 1 6 8 - $ 2 9 9 - 6 4 . 0 % 55 2 0 R I S K , L O S S , C L A I M M G M T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! IN S U R A N C E $ 4 6 7 $ 4 6 7 $ 1 6 8 - $ 2 9 9 - 6 4 . 0 % $0 # D I V / 0 ! 62 0 0 E Q U I P R E P A I R S / N O N V E H I C L E $ 0 $ 1 5 0 $ 1 5 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % OU T S I D E S E R V I C E S $ 0 $ 1 5 0 $ 1 5 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 01 - 0 4 H U M A N R E S O U R C E S PAGE 10 OF 49Page 130 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 01 - 0 4 H U M A N R E S O U R C E S LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 71 1 0 E M P L O Y E E R E C O G N I T I O N $ 1 3 , 2 9 5 $ 1 3 , 1 5 0 $ 1 3 , 1 5 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 71 5 0 D U E S & S U B S C R I P T I O N S $ 2 , 2 2 2 $ 2 , 0 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 71 7 0 T R A V E L E X P E N S E $ 1 6 3 $ 1 , 9 5 0 $ 1 , 9 6 0 $ 1 0 0 . 5 % 72 0 1 C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T B E L O W $ 5 0 $1 , 2 4 3 $ 1 , 8 0 0 $ 8 6 2 - $ 9 3 8 - 5 2 . 1 % 72 0 2 M I C R O C O M P U T E R S O F T W A R E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 72 2 1 O T H E R E X P E N S E $ 4 , 6 9 6 $ 7 , 5 0 0 $ 7 , 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 72 4 0 T U I T I O N & T R A I N I N G $ 2 0 0 $ 1 , 4 5 5 $ 2 , 4 5 5 $ 1 , 0 0 0 6 8 . 7 % 72 4 5 T U I T I O N R E I M B U R S E M E N T $ 4 7 , 4 6 4 $ 4 5 , 0 0 0 $ 4 0 , 0 0 0 - $ 5 , 0 0 0 - 1 1 . 1 % 74 7 5 I M P R O V E M E N T S - U N D E R $ 5 0 0 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! OT H E R $ 6 9 , 2 8 3 $ 7 2 , 8 5 5 $ 6 7 , 9 2 7 - $ 4 , 9 2 8 - 6 . 8 % 91 0 0 O F F I C E E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 92 0 1 M I C R O C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 99 1 0 O F F I C E F U R N I T U R E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! CA P I T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! TO T A L H U M A N R E S O U R C E S $ 3 3 6 , 0 1 9 $ 3 7 4 , 8 1 0 $ 3 6 3 , 8 4 9 - $ 1 0 , 9 6 1 - 2 . 9 % 01 - 0 4 H U M A N R E S O U R C E S PAGE 11 OF 49Page 131 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 01 - 0 5 I N F O R M A T I O N S E R V I C E S LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 10 0 1 R E G U L A R E A R N I N G S $ 4 2 9 , 9 3 5 $ 4 4 3 , 5 9 0 $ 4 5 1 , 3 8 1 $ 7 , 7 9 1 1 . 8 % 10 0 5 L O N G E V I T Y P A Y $ 1 , 7 9 3 $ 1 , 8 6 4 $ 2 , 1 0 9 $ 2 4 5 1 3 . 1 % 10 0 7 C A R A L L O W A N C E $ 7 , 2 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 10 0 9 C E L L P H O N E A L L O W A N C E $ 0 $ 0 $ 1 , 2 0 0 $ 1 , 2 0 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 1 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E F . I . C . A . $ 3 0 , 7 9 2 $ 3 3 , 4 0 1 $ 3 4 , 2 0 9 $ 8 0 8 2 . 4 % 11 2 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E T . M . R . S . $ 6 0 , 7 2 1 $ 6 0 , 2 1 3 $ 4 8 , 4 9 9 - $ 1 1 , 7 1 4 - 1 9 . 5 % 11 3 0 I N S U R A N C E - E M P L O Y E E L I F E $ 2 , 1 4 7 $ 2 , 9 8 2 $ 2 , 4 3 8 - $ 5 4 4 - 1 8 . 2 % 11 3 1 I N S U R A N C E - W O R K M E N S C O M P $ 5 3 2 $ 5 8 3 $ 6 0 1 $ 1 8 3 . 1 % 11 3 2 I N S U R A N C E - U N E M P L O Y M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 3 5 H E A L T H I N S U R A N C E $ 5 5 , 0 3 5 $ 4 5 , 0 0 0 $ 4 5 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % SA L A R I E S & B E N E F I T S $ 5 8 8 , 1 5 5 $ 5 9 4 , 8 3 3 $ 5 9 2 , 6 3 7 - $ 2 , 1 9 6 - 0 . 4 % 20 2 9 C L O T H I N G A L L O W A N C E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 21 0 0 O F F I C E S U P P L I E S $ 1 , 6 7 6 $ 1 , 5 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 23 1 8 C O M P U T E R S U P P L I E S $ 8 , 3 5 6 $ 1 3 , 7 3 2 $ 1 2 , 8 4 2 - $ 8 9 0 - 6 . 5 % SU P P L I E S $ 1 0 , 0 3 2 $ 1 5 , 2 3 2 $ 1 4 , 3 4 2 - $ 8 9 0 - 5 . 8 % 30 1 0 P O S T A G E $ 2 8 2 $ 1 3 9 $ 1 3 9 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 6 0 P R O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 4 2 , 5 9 7 $ 3 5 , 2 9 0 $ 4 1 , 9 1 0 $ 6 , 6 2 0 1 8 . 8 % 30 6 3 P R O G R A M M I N G / M A I N T E N A N C E $ 9 4 , 2 5 6 $ 1 1 6 , 3 6 8 $ 1 1 7 , 8 7 3 $ 1 , 5 0 5 1 . 3 % PR O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 1 3 7 , 1 3 5 $ 1 5 1 , 7 9 7 $ 1 5 9 , 9 2 2 $ 8 , 1 2 5 5 . 4 % 41 1 0 H E A T , L I G H T , W A T E R U T I L $ 7 , 5 7 6 $ 8 , 1 0 5 $ 8 , 5 1 4 $ 4 0 9 5 . 0 % 41 2 0 T E L E P H O N E S E R V I C E $ 8 3 , 6 3 9 $ 1 0 1 , 5 2 8 $ 1 0 3 , 0 2 4 $ 1 , 4 9 6 1 . 5 % UT I L I T I E S $ 9 1 , 2 1 5 $ 1 0 9 , 6 3 3 $ 1 1 1 , 5 3 8 $ 1 , 9 0 5 1 . 7 % 55 0 6 I N S U R A N C E - G E N E R A L L I A B I L I T Y $ 5 5 2 $ 5 5 2 $ 1 9 9 - $ 3 5 3 - 6 3 . 9 % IN S U R A N C E $ 5 5 2 $ 5 5 2 $ 1 9 9 - $ 3 5 3 - 6 3 . 9 % 62 0 0 E Q U I P R E P A I R S / N O N V E H I C L E $ 3 8 , 7 6 2 $ 4 2 , 8 6 9 $ 4 3 , 3 1 5 $ 4 4 6 1 . 0 % OU T S I D E S E R V I C E S $ 3 8 , 7 6 2 $ 4 2 , 8 6 9 $ 4 3 , 3 1 5 $ 4 4 6 1 . 0 % 01 - 0 5 I N F O R M A T I O N S E R V I C E S PAGE 12 OF 49Page 132 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 01 - 0 5 I N F O R M A T I O N S E R V I C E S LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 71 5 0 D U E S & S U B S C R I P T I O N S $ 2 7 2 $ 4 1 5 $ 3 3 5 - $ 8 0 - 1 9 . 3 % 71 7 0 T R A V E L E X P E N S E $ 8 , 6 3 3 $ 1 0 , 4 5 0 $ 1 4 , 8 3 0 $ 4 , 3 8 0 4 1 . 9 % 72 0 1 C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T B E L O W $ 5 0 $1 3 , 1 6 1 $ 3 2 , 5 0 0 $ 2 3 , 2 9 4 - $ 9 , 2 0 6 - 2 8 . 3 % 72 0 2 M I C R O C O M P U T E R S O F T W A R E $ 4 0 , 7 8 2 $ 1 , 6 2 0 $ 1 , 6 2 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 72 2 1 O T H E R E X P E N S E $ 1 3 8 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 72 4 0 T U I T I O N & T R A I N I N G ( $ 1 5 0 ) $ 1 4 , 4 3 5 $ 1 5 , 6 3 0 $ 1 , 1 9 5 8 . 3 % 74 7 5 I M P R O V E M E N T S - - U N D E R $ 5 0 0 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! OT H E R $ 6 2 , 8 3 6 $ 5 9 , 4 2 0 $ 5 5 , 7 0 9 - $ 3 , 7 1 1 - 6 . 2 % 91 0 0 O F F I C E E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 92 0 0 M I D R A N G E C O M P U T E R E Q U I P $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 92 0 1 M I C R O C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T $ 1 7 , 0 7 3 $ 8 , 0 0 0 $ 1 9 , 0 0 0 $ 1 1 , 0 0 0 1 3 7 . 5 % 92 0 2 M I D R A N G E C O M P U T E R P R O G R . $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 99 1 0 O F F I C E F U R N I T U R E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! CA P I T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S $ 1 7 , 0 7 3 $ 8 , 0 0 0 $ 1 9 , 0 0 0 $ 1 1 , 0 0 0 1 3 7 . 5 % TO T A L I N F O R M A T I O N S E R V I C E S $ 9 4 5 , 7 6 0 $ 9 8 2 , 3 3 6 $ 9 9 6 , 6 6 2 $ 1 4 , 3 2 6 1 . 5 % 01 - 0 5 I N F O R M A T I O N S E R V I C E S PAGE 13 OF 49Page 133 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 01 - 1 0 C O U R T LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 10 0 1 R E G U L A R E A R N I N G S $ 1 8 0 , 3 7 9 $ 1 8 5 , 5 4 9 $ 1 9 1 , 0 0 6 $ 5 , 4 5 7 2 . 9 % 10 0 2 O V E R T I M E E A R N I N G S $ 4 , 4 8 0 $ 2 , 5 1 9 $ 4 , 5 3 8 $ 2 , 0 1 9 8 0 . 2 % 10 0 5 L O N G E V I T Y P A Y $ 4 6 9 $ 2 , 8 8 4 $ 6 3 4 - $ 2 , 2 5 0 - 7 8 . 0 % 10 0 6 E D U C A T I O N P A Y $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 10 0 7 C A R A L L O W A N C E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 1 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E F . I . C . A . $ 1 2 , 7 4 6 $ 1 4 , 6 0 8 $ 1 5 , 0 0 8 $ 4 0 0 2 . 7 % 11 2 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E T . M . R . S . $ 1 5 , 1 9 5 $ 1 4 , 7 7 1 $ 1 2 , 4 5 5 - $ 2 , 3 1 6 - 1 5 . 7 % 11 3 0 I N S U R A N C E - E M P L O Y E E L I F E $ 6 3 2 $ 1 , 2 6 8 $ 7 5 2 - $ 5 1 6 - 4 0 . 7 % 11 3 1 I N S U R A N C E - W O R K M E N S C O M P $ 2 3 2 $ 2 4 4 $ 2 5 5 $ 1 1 4 . 5 % 11 3 2 I N S U R A N C E - U N E M P L O Y M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 3 5 H E A L T H I N S U R A N C E $ 4 4 , 7 1 8 $ 3 6 , 0 0 0 $ 3 6 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % SA L A R I E S & B E N E F I T S $ 2 5 8 , 8 5 1 $ 2 5 7 , 8 4 3 $ 2 6 0 , 6 4 8 $ 2 , 8 0 5 1 . 1 % 20 2 9 C L O T H I N G A L L O W A N C E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 21 0 0 O F F I C E S U P P L I E S $ 1 , 2 5 1 $ 1 , 3 0 0 $ 1 , 3 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 23 1 8 C O M P U T E R S U P P L I E S $ 4 1 9 $ 1 , 4 0 0 $ 1 , 4 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 23 5 0 S U P P L I E S & M A T E R I A L S $ 4 9 7 $ 4 0 0 $ 4 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % SU P P L I E S $ 2 , 1 6 7 $ 3 , 1 0 0 $ 3 , 1 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 0 9 C O L L E C T I O N S E R V I C E S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 30 1 0 P O S T A G E $ 3 , 8 3 5 $ 2 , 1 1 8 $ 2 , 1 1 8 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 1 4 P U B L I C A T I O N S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 30 6 0 P R O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 1 9 , 7 4 8 $ 1 2 , 5 4 0 $ 2 5 , 7 9 0 $ 1 3 , 2 5 0 1 0 5 . 7 % 30 6 3 P R O G R A M M I N G / M A I N T E N A N C E $ 1 2 , 1 3 5 $ 1 8 , 4 6 8 $ 1 8 , 5 4 3 $ 7 5 0 . 4 % 31 1 3 P R I N T I N G $ 4 , 2 6 0 $ 2 , 7 7 2 $ 2 , 5 7 0 - $ 2 0 2 - 7 . 3 % PR O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 3 9 , 9 7 8 $ 3 5 , 8 9 8 $ 4 9 , 0 2 1 $ 1 3 , 1 2 3 3 6 . 6 % 41 1 0 H E A T , L I G H T , W A T E R U T I L $ 3 , 1 2 6 $ 3 , 3 5 9 $ 3 , 5 2 0 $ 1 6 1 4 . 8 % 41 2 0 T E L E P H O N E S E R V I C E $ 3 , 8 0 7 $ 4 , 6 5 6 $ 4 , 6 5 6 $ 0 0 . 0 % UT I L I T I E S $ 6 , 9 3 3 $ 8 , 0 1 5 $ 8 , 1 7 6 $ 1 6 1 2 . 0 % 55 0 0 I N S U R A N C E - A U T O L I A B I L I T Y $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 01 - 1 0 C O U R T PAGE 14 OF 49Page 134 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 01 - 1 0 C O U R T LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 55 0 6 I N S U R A N C E - G E N E R A L L I A B I L I T Y $ 5 1 4 $ 5 1 4 $ 1 8 5 - $ 3 2 9 - 6 4 . 0 % IN S U R A N C E $ 5 1 4 $ 5 1 4 $ 1 8 5 - $ 3 2 9 - 6 4 . 0 % 62 0 0 E Q U I P R E P A I R S / N O N V E H I C L E $ 2 5 8 $ 5 0 0 $ 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % OU T S I D E S E R V I C E S $ 2 5 8 $ 5 0 0 $ 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 71 5 0 D U E S & S U B S C R I P T I O N S $ 1 2 1 $ 1 4 0 $ 1 4 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 71 7 0 T R A V E L E X P E N S E $ 2 , 1 1 5 $ 5 , 5 0 0 $ 6 , 7 5 0 $ 1 , 2 5 0 2 2 . 7 % 72 0 1 C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T B E L O W $ 5 0 $3 7 5 $ 6 , 2 5 0 $ 5 0 0 - $ 5 , 7 5 0 - 9 2 . 0 % 72 0 2 M I C R O C O M P U T E R S O F T W A R E $ 3 1 4 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 72 2 1 O T H E R E X P E N S E $ 1 6 1 $ 2 0 0 $ 2 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 72 4 0 T U I T I O N & T R A I N I N G $ 1 , 7 7 7 $ 2 , 0 0 0 $ 2 , 5 0 0 $ 5 0 0 2 5 . 0 % 74 7 5 I M P R O V E M E N T S - - U N D E R $ 5 0 0 0 $ 1 5 4 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! OT H E R $ 5 , 0 1 7 $ 1 4 , 0 9 0 $ 1 0 , 0 9 0 - $ 4 , 0 0 0 - 2 8 . 4 % 91 0 0 O F F I C E E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 92 0 1 M I C R O C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 92 0 2 M I D R A N G E C O M P U T E R P R O G R . $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 99 1 0 O F F I C E F U R N I T U R E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! CA P I T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! TO T A L C O U R T $ 3 1 3 , 7 1 8 $ 3 1 9 , 9 6 0 $ 3 3 1 , 7 2 0 $ 1 1 , 7 6 0 3 . 7 % 01 - 1 0 C O U R T PAGE 15 OF 49Page 135 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 01 - 1 9 C O M M U N I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 10 0 1 R E G U L A R E A R N I N G S $ 6 6 3 , 7 5 3 $ 6 9 7 , 3 9 8 $ 7 1 0 , 6 2 9 $ 1 3 , 2 3 1 1 . 9 % 10 0 2 O V E R T I M E E A R N I N G S $ 5 6 6 $ 7 8 5 $ 5 2 7 - $ 2 5 8 - 3 2 . 9 % 10 0 5 L O N G E V I T Y P A Y $ 4 , 4 0 5 $ 4 , 9 0 8 $ 4 , 8 5 9 - $ 4 9 - 1 . 0 % 10 0 7 C A R A L L O W A N C E $ 7 , 2 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 10 0 9 C E L L P H O N E A L L O W A N C E $ 6 6 0 $ 7 2 0 $ 3 6 0 - $ 3 6 0 - 5 0 . 0 % 11 1 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E F . I . C . A . $ 5 0 , 8 7 1 $ 5 3 , 4 7 9 $ 5 4 , 4 2 3 $ 9 4 4 1 . 8 % 11 2 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E T . M . R . S . $ 9 1 , 9 5 2 $ 9 2 , 6 4 0 $ 7 5 , 9 7 6 - $ 1 6 , 6 6 4 - 1 8 . 0 % 11 3 0 I N S U R A N C E - E M P L O Y E E L I F E $ 4 , 0 7 8 $ 4 , 6 0 7 $ 4 , 7 0 9 $ 1 0 2 2 . 2 % 11 3 1 I N S U R A N C E - W O R K M E N S C O M P $ 1 , 4 1 6 $ 1 , 4 6 8 $ 1 , 4 4 9 - $ 1 9 - 1 . 3 % 11 3 2 I N S U R A N C E - U N E M P L O Y M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 3 5 H E A L T H I N S U R A N C E $ 8 6 , 2 2 2 $ 8 1 , 0 0 0 $ 7 2 , 0 0 0 - $ 9 , 0 0 0 - 1 1 . 1 % SA L A R I E S & B E N E F I T S $ 9 1 1 , 1 2 3 $ 9 4 4 , 2 0 5 $ 9 3 2 , 1 3 2 - $ 1 2 , 0 7 3 - 1 . 3 % 20 2 9 C L O T H I N G A L L O W A N C E $ 7 9 8 $ 1 , 3 2 0 $ 1 , 3 2 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 21 0 0 O F F I C E S U P P L I E S $ 3 , 3 5 0 $ 4 , 0 0 0 $ 4 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 23 1 8 C O M P U T E R S U P P L I E S $ 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 23 2 0 G A S , O I L & G R E A S E $ 3 , 0 2 6 $ 4 , 4 5 8 $ 4 , 9 9 2 $ 5 3 4 1 2 . 0 % 23 5 0 S U P P L I E S & M A T E R I A L S $ 1 , 3 4 1 $ 2 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 - $ 5 0 0 - 2 5 . 0 % SU P P L I E S $ 8 , 5 1 5 $ 1 2 , 7 7 8 $ 1 2 , 8 1 2 $ 3 4 0 . 3 % 30 0 3 B O A R D M E E T I N G S $ 6 5 1 $ 1 , 5 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 1 0 P O S T A G E $ 1 , 2 1 1 $ 1 , 3 3 4 $ 1 , 3 3 4 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 1 4 P U B L I C A T I O N S $ 2 , 1 9 3 $ 5 0 0 $ 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 6 0 P R O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 6 7 1 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 6 3 P R O G R A M M I N G / M A I N T E N A N C E $ 1 2 , 9 7 8 $ 1 3 , 0 8 6 $ 1 2 , 9 8 7 - $ 9 9 - 0 . 8 % 31 1 3 P R I N T I N G $ 9 6 7 $ 5 0 0 $ 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % PR O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 1 8 , 6 7 1 $ 1 7 , 9 2 0 $ 1 7 , 8 2 1 - $ 9 9 - 0 . 6 % 41 1 0 H E A T , L I G H T , W A T E R U T I L $ 4 , 7 0 7 $ 4 , 9 9 2 $ 5 , 3 1 2 $ 3 2 0 6 . 4 % 41 2 0 T E L E P H O N E S E R V I C E $ 9 , 3 6 5 $ 7 , 1 2 2 $ 7 , 1 2 2 $ 0 0 . 0 % UT I L I T I E S $ 1 4 , 0 7 2 $ 1 2 , 1 1 4 $ 1 2 , 4 3 4 $ 3 2 0 2 . 6 % 01 - 1 9 C O M M U N I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T PAGE 16 OF 49 Page 136 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 01 - 1 9 C O M M U N I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 55 0 0 I N S U R A N C E - A U T O L I A B I L I T Y $ 1 3 2 $ 1 3 2 $ 1 2 2 - $ 1 0 - 7 . 6 % 55 0 6 I N S U R A N C E - G E N E R A L L I A B I L I T Y $ 8 7 1 $ 8 7 1 $ 3 1 4 - $ 5 5 7 - 6 3 . 9 % IN S U R A N C E $ 1 , 0 0 3 $ 1 , 0 0 3 $ 4 3 6 - $ 5 6 7 - 5 6 . 5 % 61 9 0 A U T O R E P A I R S $ 1 , 0 1 3 $ 2 , 0 6 0 $ 2 , 0 6 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 61 9 5 E Q U I P M E N T M A I N T E N A N C E $ 6 , 7 1 9 $ 6 , 7 1 9 $ 1 5 , 8 9 9 $ 9 , 1 8 0 1 3 6 . 6 % 62 0 0 E Q U I P R E P A I R S / N O N V E H I C L E $ 2 4 2 $ 3 0 0 $ 3 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % OU T S I D E S E R V I C E S $ 7 , 9 7 4 $ 9 , 0 7 9 $ 1 8 , 2 5 9 $ 9 , 1 8 0 1 0 1 . 1 % 71 5 0 D U E S & S U B S C R I P T I O N S $ 2 , 3 5 4 $ 2 , 9 5 0 $ 3 , 0 9 5 $ 1 4 5 4 . 9 % 71 7 0 T R A V E L E X P E N S E $ 4 , 5 2 9 $ 2 , 8 3 5 $ 4 , 9 8 5 $ 2 , 1 5 0 7 5 . 8 % 72 0 1 C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T B E L O W $ 5 0 $4 , 2 6 7 $ 1 2 , 7 0 0 $ 2 , 2 2 7 - $ 1 0 , 4 7 3 - 8 2 . 5 % 72 0 2 M I C R O C O M P U T E R S O F T W A R E $ 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 72 2 1 O T H E R E X P E N S E $ 1 , 6 2 4 $ 4 , 5 0 0 $ 3 , 5 0 0 - $ 1 , 0 0 0 - 2 2 . 2 % 72 4 0 T U I T I O N & T R A I N I N G $ 3 , 6 8 6 $ 4 , 1 8 0 $ 5 , 5 3 1 $ 1 , 3 5 1 3 2 . 3 % 74 7 5 I M P R O V E M E N T S - - U N D E R $ 5 0 0 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! OT H E R $ 1 6 , 4 6 0 $ 2 8 , 6 6 5 $ 2 0 , 8 3 8 - $ 7 , 8 2 7 - 2 7 . 3 % 90 0 0 C A P I T A L E Q U I P M E N T R E P L A C E $ 3 , 7 7 6 $ 2 , 9 8 1 $ 2 , 1 6 7 - $ 8 1 4 - 2 7 . 3 % 91 0 0 O F F I C E E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 92 0 1 M I C R O C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 99 1 0 O F F I C E F U R N I T U R E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! CA P I T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S $ 3 , 7 7 6 $ 2 , 9 8 1 $ 2 , 1 6 7 - $ 8 1 4 - 2 7 . 3 % TO T A L C O M M U N I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T $ 9 8 1 , 5 9 4 $ 1 , 0 2 8 , 7 4 5 $ 1 , 0 1 6 , 8 9 9 - $ 1 1 , 8 4 6 - 1 . 2 % 01 - 1 9 C O M M U N I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T PAGE 17 OF 49 Page 137 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 01 - 2 0 E N G I N E E R I N G LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 10 0 1 R E G U L A R E A R N I N G S $ 5 5 6 , 0 5 4 $ 4 9 5 , 2 7 8 $ 4 9 5 , 2 7 6 - $ 2 0 . 0 % 10 0 2 O V E R T I M E E A R N I N G S $ 2 , 5 3 8 $ 6 4 6 $ 2 , 1 4 6 $ 1 , 5 0 0 2 3 2 . 2 % 10 0 5 L O N G E V I T Y P A Y $ 5 , 0 3 0 $ 4 , 4 4 0 $ 4 , 6 8 3 $ 2 4 3 5 . 5 % 10 0 7 C A R A L L O W A N C E $ 1 4 , 4 0 0 $ 1 4 , 4 0 0 $ 1 4 , 4 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 10 0 9 C E L L P H O N E A L L O W A N C E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 1 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E F . I . C . A . $ 3 8 , 8 9 4 $ 3 4 , 0 2 6 $ 3 4 , 3 6 2 $ 3 3 6 1 . 0 % 11 2 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E T . M . R . S . $ 8 0 , 6 4 0 $ 6 8 , 4 6 1 $ 5 4 , 2 3 3 - $ 1 4 , 2 2 8 - 2 0 . 8 % 11 3 0 I N S U R A N C E - E M P L O Y E E L I F E $ 4 , 1 1 2 $ 3 , 3 3 7 $ 3 , 8 4 7 $ 5 1 0 1 5 . 3 % 11 3 1 I N S U R A N C E - W O R K M E N S C O M P $ 1 , 1 8 1 $ 9 6 3 $ 9 4 5 - $ 1 8 - 1 . 9 % 11 3 2 I N S U R A N C E - U N E M P L O Y M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 3 5 H E A L T H I N S U R A N C E $ 6 6 , 0 4 2 $ 4 5 , 0 0 0 $ 4 5 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % SA L A R I E S & B E N E F I T S $ 7 6 8 , 8 9 1 $ 6 6 6 , 5 5 1 $ 6 5 4 , 8 9 2 - $ 1 1 , 6 5 9 - 1 . 7 % 20 2 9 C L O T H I N G A L L O W A N C E $ 8 9 0 $ 1 , 3 5 0 $ 1 , 3 5 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 21 0 0 O F F I C E S U P P L I E S $ 1 , 1 8 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 23 1 8 C O M P U T E R S U P P L I E S $ 2 , 6 5 4 $ 3 , 5 0 0 $ 3 , 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 23 2 0 G A S , O I L & G R E A S E $ 2 , 5 2 8 $ 3 , 5 2 3 $ 3 , 4 7 4 - $ 4 9 - 1 . 4 % 23 5 0 S U P P L I E S & M A T E R I A L S $ 2 , 2 1 9 $ 2 , 5 0 0 $ 2 , 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % SU P P L I E S $ 9 , 4 7 1 $ 1 1 , 8 7 3 $ 1 1 , 8 2 4 - $ 4 9 - 0 . 4 % 30 0 3 B O A R D M E E T I N G S $ 5 4 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 30 1 0 P O S T A G E $ 8 5 $ 9 7 $ 9 7 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 1 4 P U B L I C A T I O N S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 30 6 0 P R O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 4 2 , 7 6 4 $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 6 3 P R O G R A M M I N G / M A I N T E N A N C E $ 1 4 , 6 0 3 $ 1 9 , 7 7 6 $ 1 9 , 7 7 6 $ 0 0 . 0 % 31 1 3 P R I N T I N G $ 1 2 , 6 6 9 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % PR O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 7 0 , 1 7 5 $ 3 5 , 8 7 3 $ 3 5 , 8 7 3 $ 0 0 . 0 % 41 1 0 H E A T , L I G H T , W A T E R U T I L $ 4 , 3 4 9 $ 4 , 6 1 1 $ 4 , 8 3 5 $ 2 2 4 4 . 9 % 41 2 0 T E L E P H O N E S E R V I C E $ 1 1 , 2 3 3 $ 1 3 , 1 0 5 $ 1 3 , 1 0 5 $ 0 0 . 0 % UT I L I T I E S $ 1 5 , 5 8 2 $ 1 7 , 7 1 6 $ 1 7 , 9 4 0 $ 2 2 4 1 . 3 % 01 - 2 0 E N G I N E E R I N G PAGE 18 OF 49Page 138 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 01 - 2 0 E N G I N E E R I N G LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 55 0 0 I N S U R A N C E - A U T O L I A B I L I T Y $ 2 9 8 $ 2 9 8 $ 2 7 5 - $ 2 3 - 7 . 7 % 55 0 6 I N S U R A N C E - G E N E R A L L I A B I L I T Y $ 1 , 0 9 1 $ 1 , 0 9 1 $ 3 9 3 - $ 6 9 8 - 6 4 . 0 % IN S U R A N C E $ 1 , 3 8 9 $ 1 , 3 8 9 $ 6 6 8 - $ 7 2 1 - 5 1 . 9 % 61 9 0 A U T O R E P A I R S $ 1 , 2 5 3 $ 1 , 9 6 8 $ 1 , 9 6 8 $ 0 0 . 0 % 61 9 5 E Q U I P M E N T M A I N T E N A N C E $ 7 , 0 3 3 $ 7 , 0 3 3 $ 8 , 3 8 4 $ 1 , 3 5 1 1 9 . 2 % 62 0 0 E Q U I P R E P A I R S / N O N V E H I C L E $ 1 , 9 7 5 $ 1 , 5 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % OU T S I D E S E R V I C E S $ 1 0 , 2 6 1 $ 1 0 , 5 0 1 $ 1 1 , 8 5 2 $ 1 , 3 5 1 1 2 . 9 % 71 5 0 D U E S & S U B S C R I P T I O N S $ 1 , 1 9 8 $ 9 9 0 $ 9 9 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 71 7 0 T R A V E L E X P E N S E $ 3 , 4 8 1 $ 1 , 7 8 0 $ 1 , 7 8 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 72 0 1 C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T B E L O W $ 5 0 $3 , 7 7 6 $ 3 , 0 0 0 $ 5 0 0 - $ 2 , 5 0 0 - 8 3 . 3 % 72 0 2 M I C R O C O M P U T E R S O F T W A R E $ 6 1 6 $ 5 0 0 $ 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 72 2 1 O T H E R E X P E N S E $ 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 0 - $ 1 , 0 0 0 - 1 0 0 . 0 % 72 4 0 T U I T I O N & T R A I N I N G $ 0 $ 3 , 7 1 0 $ 3 , 7 1 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 74 7 5 I M P R O V E M E N T S - - U N D E R $ 5 0 0 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! OT H E R $ 9 , 0 7 1 $ 1 0 , 9 8 0 $ 7 , 4 8 0 - $ 3 , 5 0 0 - 3 1 . 9 % 90 0 0 C A P I T A L E Q U I P M E N T R E P L A C E $ 6 , 1 5 9 $ 4 , 3 2 9 $ 3 , 6 8 3 - $ 6 4 6 - 1 4 . 9 % 91 0 0 O F F I C E E Q U I P M E N T $ 1 1 , 1 6 4 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 92 0 1 M I C R O C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 99 1 0 O F F I C E F U R N I T U R E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! CA P I T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S $ 1 7 , 3 2 3 $ 4 , 3 2 9 $ 3 , 6 8 3 - $ 6 4 6 - 1 4 . 9 % TO T A L E N G I N E E R I N G $ 9 0 2 , 1 6 3 $ 7 5 9 , 2 1 2 $ 7 4 4 , 2 1 2 - $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 - 2 . 0 % 01 - 2 0 E N G I N E E R I N G PAGE 19 OF 49Page 139 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 01 - 2 5 T R A F F I C LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 10 0 1 R E G U L A R E A R N I N G S $ 3 7 0 , 0 3 1 $ 3 8 4 , 2 8 1 $ 3 8 6 , 2 1 3 $ 1 , 9 3 2 0 . 5 % 10 0 2 O V E R T I M E E A R N I N G S $ 4 , 2 0 2 $ 8 , 9 9 9 $ 3 , 2 8 6 - $ 5 , 7 1 3 - 6 3 . 5 % 10 0 5 L O N G E V I T Y P A Y $ 3 , 5 1 1 $ 3 , 7 6 4 $ 4 , 1 5 2 $ 3 8 8 1 0 . 3 % 10 0 7 C A R A L L O W A N C E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 1 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E F . I . C . A . $ 2 8 , 2 7 1 $ 3 0 , 3 7 4 $ 3 0 , 1 1 5 - $ 2 5 9 - 0 . 9 % 11 2 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E T . M . R . S . $ 5 2 , 7 6 8 $ 5 2 , 8 0 7 $ 4 1 , 3 3 4 - $ 1 1 , 4 7 3 - 2 1 . 7 % 11 3 0 I N S U R A N C E - E M P L O Y E E L I F E $ 2 , 3 0 7 $ 2 , 6 4 9 $ 2 , 5 6 2 - $ 8 7 - 3 . 3 % 11 3 1 I N S U R A N C E - W O R K M E N S C O M P $ 6 , 3 8 5 $ 6 , 6 9 6 $ 7 , 0 1 2 $ 3 1 6 4 . 7 % 11 3 2 I N S U R A N C E - U N E M P L O Y M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 3 5 H E A L T H I N S U R A N C E $ 6 6 , 0 4 2 $ 6 3 , 0 0 0 $ 6 3 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % SA L A R I E S & B E N E F I T S $ 5 3 3 , 5 1 7 $ 5 5 2 , 5 6 9 $ 5 3 7 , 6 7 4 - $ 1 4 , 8 9 5 - 2 . 7 % 20 2 9 C L O T H I N G A L L O W A N C E $ 2 , 7 8 4 $ 3 , 4 2 0 $ 3 , 4 2 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 21 0 0 O F F I C E S U P P L I E S $ 1 , 0 4 5 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 23 1 8 C O M P U T E R S U P P L I E S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 23 2 0 G A S , O I L & G R E A S E $ 6 , 6 3 3 $ 8 , 6 5 4 $ 7 , 7 8 5 - $ 8 6 9 - 1 0 . 0 % 23 5 0 S U P P L I E S & M A T E R I A L S $ 6 5 , 0 7 4 $ 9 4 , 9 0 0 $ 9 4 , 9 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 23 6 0 S M A L L T O O L S $ 6 4 $ 2 5 0 $ 2 5 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % SU P P L I E S $ 7 5 , 6 0 0 $ 1 0 8 , 2 2 4 $ 1 0 7 , 3 5 5 - $ 8 6 9 - 0 . 8 % 30 1 0 P O S T A G E $ 7 $ 8 $ 8 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 6 0 P R O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 1 8 , 6 9 3 $ 2 4 , 0 0 0 $ 2 4 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 6 3 P R O G R A M M I N G / M A I N T E N A N C E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 31 1 3 P R I N T I N G $ 2 , 1 2 9 $ 2 , 0 3 5 $ 2 , 0 3 5 $ 0 0 . 0 % 31 1 5 C O N T R A C T M A I N T E N A N C E $ 4 , 6 4 4 $ 8 , 6 4 4 $ 8 , 1 8 2 - $ 4 6 2 - 5 . 3 % PR O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 2 5 , 4 7 3 $ 3 4 , 6 8 7 $ 3 4 , 2 2 5 - $ 4 6 2 - 1 . 3 % 41 1 0 H E A T , L I G H T , W A T E R U T I L $ 3 7 , 6 1 3 $ 3 8 , 4 1 0 $ 4 1 , 4 6 9 $ 3 , 0 5 9 8 . 0 % 41 2 0 T E L E P H O N E S E R V I C E $ 2 , 9 1 2 $ 3 , 0 6 4 $ 3 , 0 6 4 $ 0 0 . 0 % UT I L I T I E S $ 4 0 , 5 2 5 $ 4 1 , 4 7 4 $ 4 4 , 5 3 3 $ 3 , 0 5 9 7 . 4 % 55 0 0 I N S U R A N C E - A U T O L I A B I L I T Y $ 1 , 4 9 3 $ 1 , 4 9 3 $ 1 , 3 7 8 - $ 1 1 5 - 7 . 7 % 01 - 2 5 T R A F F I C PAGE 20 OF 49Page 140 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 01 - 2 5 T R A F F I C LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 55 0 6 I N S U R A N C E - G E N E R A L L I A B I L I T Y $ 9 6 3 $ 9 6 3 $ 3 4 7 - $ 6 1 6 - 6 4 . 0 % IN S U R A N C E $ 2 , 4 5 6 $ 2 , 4 5 6 $ 1 , 7 2 5 - $ 7 3 1 - 2 9 . 8 % 61 9 0 A U T O R E P A I R S $ 5 , 8 3 2 $ 5 , 0 8 4 $ 5 , 0 8 4 $ 0 0 . 0 % 61 9 5 E Q U I P M E N T M A I N T E N A N C E $ 3 4 , 6 4 1 $ 3 4 , 6 4 1 $ 2 8 , 4 1 3 - $ 6 , 2 2 8 - 1 8 . 0 % 62 0 0 E Q U I P R E P A I R S / N O N V E H I C L E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 63 5 0 S I G N A L M A I N T . & R E P $ 6 0 , 3 0 8 $ 6 7 , 0 0 0 $ 6 7 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % OU T S I D E S E R V I C E S $ 1 0 0 , 7 8 1 $ 1 0 6 , 7 2 5 $ 1 0 0 , 4 9 7 - $ 6 , 2 2 8 - 5 . 8 % 71 5 0 D U E S & S U B S C R I P T I O N S $ 4 8 0 $ 4 8 0 $ 4 8 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 71 7 0 T R A V E L E X P E N S E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 72 0 1 C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T B E L O W $ 5 0 $1 , 2 0 7 $ 0 $ 1 , 3 6 5 $ 1 , 3 6 5 # D I V / 0 ! 72 0 2 M I C R O C O M P U T E R S O F T W A R E $ 3 1 4 $ 5 0 0 $ 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 72 2 1 O T H E R E X P E N S E $ 0 $ 3 0 0 $ 3 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 72 4 0 T U I T I O N & T R A I N I N G $ 2 0 0 $ 9 0 0 $ 5 0 0 - $ 4 0 0 - 4 4 . 4 % 72 6 0 E Q U I P M E N T R E N T A L $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 74 7 5 I M P R O V E M E N T S - - U N D E R $ 5 0 0 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! OT H E R $ 2 , 2 0 1 $ 2 , 1 8 0 $ 3 , 1 4 5 $ 9 6 5 4 4 . 3 % 90 0 0 C A P I T A L E Q U I P M E N T R E P L A C E $ 1 9 , 8 8 3 $ 1 5 , 9 0 6 $ 1 9 , 7 8 0 $ 3 , 8 7 4 2 4 . 4 % 91 0 0 O F F I C E E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 91 1 5 S M A L L E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 92 0 1 M I C R O C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 94 0 2 T R A F F I C S I G N A L I N S T A L L . $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 94 0 4 T R A F F I C E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 99 1 0 O F F I C E F U R N I T U R E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! CA P I T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S $ 1 9 , 8 8 3 $ 1 5 , 9 0 6 $ 1 9 , 7 8 0 $ 3 , 8 7 4 2 4 . 4 % TO T A L T R A F F I C $ 8 0 0 , 4 3 6 $ 8 6 4 , 2 2 1 $ 8 4 8 , 9 3 4 - $ 1 5 , 2 8 7 - 1 . 8 % 01 - 2 5 T R A F F I C PAGE 21 OF 49Page 141 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 01 - 3 5 F A C I L I T Y M A I N T E N A N C E LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 10 0 1 R E G U L A R E A R N I N G S $ 1 9 0 , 3 4 1 $ 1 9 6 , 9 6 4 $ 1 9 8 , 8 6 4 $ 1 , 9 0 0 1 . 0 % 10 0 2 O V E R T I M E E A R N I N G S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 10 0 5 L O N G E V I T Y P A Y $ 2 , 2 1 5 $ 2 , 3 0 8 $ 2 , 4 1 5 $ 1 0 7 4 . 6 % 10 0 7 C A R A L L O W A N C E $ 7 , 2 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 11 1 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E F . I . C . A . $ 1 5 , 0 9 1 $ 1 5 , 2 4 4 $ 1 5 , 9 4 8 $ 7 0 4 4 . 6 % 11 2 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E T . M . R . S . $ 2 7 , 8 9 8 $ 2 7 , 4 5 3 $ 2 1 , 8 9 0 - $ 5 , 5 6 3 - 2 0 . 3 % 11 3 0 I N S U R A N C E - E M P L O Y E E L I F E $ 1 , 1 9 6 $ 1 , 3 2 9 $ 1 , 3 1 7 - $ 1 2 - 0 . 9 % 11 3 1 I N S U R A N C E - W O R K M E N S C O M P $ 1 , 0 1 3 $ 1 , 0 5 3 $ 1 , 0 3 0 - $ 2 3 - 2 . 2 % 11 3 2 I N S U R A N C E - U N E M P L O Y M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 3 5 H E A L T H I N S U R A N C E $ 3 3 , 0 2 1 $ 2 7 , 0 0 0 $ 2 7 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % SA L A R I E S & B E N E F I T S $ 2 7 7 , 9 7 5 $ 2 7 8 , 5 5 0 $ 2 7 5 , 6 6 4 - $ 2 , 8 8 6 - 1 . 0 % 20 2 9 C L O T H I N G A L L O W A N C E $ 3 6 4 $ 1 , 2 9 4 $ 6 7 0 - $ 6 2 4 - 4 8 . 2 % 21 0 0 O F F I C E S U P P L I E S $ 8 1 9 $ 4 8 0 $ 4 8 2 $ 2 0 . 4 % 23 1 8 C O M P U T E R S U P P L I E S $ 0 $ 2 6 1 $ 2 6 1 $ 0 0 . 0 % 23 2 0 G A S , O I L & G R E A S E $ 2 , 0 0 8 $ 9 , 5 0 8 $ 8 , 4 2 7 - $ 1 , 0 8 1 - 1 1 . 4 % 23 5 0 S U P P L I E S & M A T E R I A L S $ 2 3 9 $ 2 6 , 5 6 9 $ 7 , 1 8 8 - $ 1 9 , 3 8 1 - 7 2 . 9 % 23 6 0 S M A L L T O O L S $ 0 $ 1 , 0 9 8 $ 1 , 0 9 8 $ 0 0 . 0 % SU P P L I E S $ 3 , 4 3 0 $ 3 9 , 2 1 0 $ 1 8 , 1 2 6 - $ 2 1 , 0 8 4 - 5 3 . 8 % 30 1 0 P O S T A G E $ 1 5 $ 3 0 $ 3 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 1 4 P U B L I C A T I O N S $ 0 $ 3 7 8 $ 3 7 8 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 6 0 P R O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S ( $ 2 , 8 3 4 ) $ 2 , 0 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 6 3 P R O G R A M M I N G / M A I N T E N A N C E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 31 1 3 P R I N T I N G $ 6 2 6 $ 0 $ 2 0 0 $ 2 0 0 # D I V / 0 ! 31 1 5 C O N T R A C T M A I N T E N A N C E $ 9 1 , 0 9 0 $ 1 2 7 , 7 1 5 $ 1 6 1 , 0 0 4 $ 3 3 , 2 8 9 2 6 . 1 % PR O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 8 8 , 8 9 7 $ 1 3 0 , 1 2 3 $ 1 6 3 , 6 1 2 $ 3 3 , 4 8 9 2 5 . 7 % 41 1 0 H E A T , L I G H T , W A T E R U T I L $ 1 2 7 , 9 6 2 $ 1 4 8 , 8 5 6 $ 1 2 8 , 7 5 6 - $ 2 0 , 1 0 0 - 1 3 . 5 % 41 2 0 T E L E P H O N E S E R V I C E $ 3 , 8 8 7 $ 4 , 3 2 6 $ 4 , 3 2 6 $ 0 0 . 0 % UT I L I T I E S $ 1 3 1 , 8 4 9 $ 1 5 3 , 1 8 2 $ 1 3 3 , 0 8 2 - $ 2 0 , 1 0 0 - 1 3 . 1 % 55 0 0 I N S U R A N C E - A U T O L I A B I L I T Y $ 1 , 8 8 7 $ 1 , 8 8 7 $ 1 , 7 4 2 - $ 1 4 5 - 7 . 7 % 55 0 6 I N S U R A N C E - G E N E R A L L I A B I L I T Y $ 1 , 0 8 5 $ 1 , 0 8 5 $ 3 9 1 - $ 6 9 4 - 6 4 . 0 % 01 - 3 5 F A C I L I T Y M A I N T E N A N C E PAGE 22 OF 49Page 142 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 01 - 3 5 F A C I L I T Y M A I N T E N A N C E LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 55 1 0 I N S U R A N C E - B L D G & C O N T E N T S $ 2 6 , 6 7 2 $ 2 6 , 6 7 2 $ 4 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 3 , 3 2 8 5 0 . 0 % IN S U R A N C E $ 2 9 , 6 4 4 $ 2 9 , 6 4 4 $ 4 2 , 1 3 3 $ 1 2 , 4 8 9 4 2 . 1 % 61 8 4 S E C U R I T Y E X P E N S E $ 5 , 6 0 4 $ 1 5 , 5 8 2 $ 1 4 , 0 8 3 - $ 1 , 4 9 9 - 9 . 6 % 61 9 0 A U T O R E P A I R S $ 1 , 3 8 0 $ 2 , 1 1 0 $ 2 , 1 1 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 61 9 5 E Q U I P M E N T M A I N T E N A N C E $ 3 3 , 7 3 4 $ 3 3 , 7 3 5 $ 1 7 , 3 1 5 - $ 1 6 , 4 2 0 - 4 8 . 7 % 62 0 0 E Q U I P R E P A I R S / N O N V E H I C L E $ 1 , 3 5 5 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 62 5 0 F A C I L I T Y M A I N T & R E P $ 4 2 , 8 3 3 $ 5 9 , 5 4 9 $ 5 0 , 0 4 9 - $ 9 , 5 0 0 - 1 6 . 0 % 63 3 0 R A D I O S E R V I C E $ 0 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % OU T S I D E S E R V I C E S $ 8 4 , 9 0 6 $ 1 2 1 , 9 7 6 $ 9 4 , 5 5 7 - $ 2 7 , 4 1 9 - 2 2 . 5 % 71 5 0 D U E S & S U B S C R I P T I O N S $ 0 $ 2 7 0 $ 1 2 0 - $ 1 5 0 - 5 5 . 6 % 71 7 0 T R A V E L E X P E N S E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 72 0 1 C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T B E L O W $ 5 0 $0 $ 0 $ 5 , 1 8 3 $ 5 , 1 8 3 # D I V / 0 ! 72 0 2 M I C R O C O M P U T E R S O F T W A R E $ 7 8 $ 5 0 0 $ 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 72 2 1 O T H E R E X P E N S E $ 0 $ 2 5 0 $ 2 5 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 72 4 0 T U I T I O N & T R A I N I N G $ 3 6 0 $ 3 2 5 $ 3 2 5 $ 0 0 . 0 % 72 6 0 E Q U I P M E N T R E N T A L $ 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 73 3 1 P O W E R T O O L S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 73 3 4 T R A N S F E R T O E Q U I P S E R V $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 74 7 5 I M P R O V E M E N T S - - U N D E R $ 5 0 0 0 $ 6 , 6 2 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % OT H E R $ 7 , 0 5 8 $ 7 , 3 4 5 $ 1 2 , 3 7 8 $ 5 , 0 3 3 6 8 . 5 % 90 0 0 C A P I T A L E Q U I P M E N T R E P L A C E $ 1 6 , 8 9 0 $ 1 3 , 6 7 7 $ 1 5 , 2 0 1 $ 1 , 5 2 4 1 1 . 1 % 91 0 0 O F F I C E E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 91 1 0 R A D I O E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 91 1 5 S M A L L E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 5 4 0 $ 5 4 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 92 0 1 M I C R O C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 99 1 0 O F F I C E F U R N I T U R E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 99 5 0 R E M O D E L I N G P R O J E C T S $ 1 3 , 8 9 5 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 99 6 2 C O N S T R U C T I O N S T A R T - U P $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! CA P I T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S $ 3 0 , 7 8 5 $ 1 4 , 2 1 7 $ 1 5 , 7 4 1 $ 1 , 5 2 4 1 0 . 7 % TO T A L F A C I L I T Y M A I N T E N A N C E $ 6 5 4 , 5 4 4 $ 7 7 4 , 2 4 7 $ 7 5 5 , 2 9 3 - $ 1 8 , 9 5 4 - 2 . 4 % 01 - 3 5 F A C I L I T Y M A I N T E N A N C E PAGE 23 OF 49Page 143 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 01 - 4 0 F I R E LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 10 0 1 R E G U L A R E A R N I N G S $ 2 , 6 1 0 , 3 6 9 $ 2 , 8 9 1 , 3 8 9 $ 2 , 7 1 1 , 2 2 3 - $ 1 8 0 , 1 6 6 - 6 . 2 % 10 0 2 O V E R T I M E E A R N I N G S $ 3 3 1 , 8 7 8 $ 3 4 2 , 3 3 3 $ 3 4 3 , 8 2 6 $ 1 , 4 9 3 0 . 4 % 10 0 5 L O N G E V I T Y P A Y $ 1 8 , 4 4 7 $ 1 9 , 7 2 0 $ 2 1 , 0 2 9 $ 1 , 3 0 9 6 . 6 % 10 0 6 E D U C A T I O N P A Y $ 3 6 , 1 1 7 $ 3 7 , 2 6 1 $ 4 0 , 5 6 0 $ 3 , 2 9 9 8 . 9 % 10 0 7 C A R A L L O W A N C E $ 7 , 2 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 10 0 9 C E L L P H O N E A L L O W A N C E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 1 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E F . I . C . A . $ 2 2 0 , 5 2 8 $ 2 3 8 , 9 1 5 $ 2 3 5 , 5 2 5 - $ 3 , 3 9 0 - 1 . 4 % 11 2 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E T . M . R . S . $ 1 9 , 4 5 2 $ 1 9 , 1 2 9 $ 1 5 , 0 9 5 - $ 4 , 0 3 4 - 2 1 . 1 % 11 2 1 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E F . R . & R . $ 4 4 7 , 0 3 1 $ 4 9 0 , 1 3 8 $ 4 6 3 , 1 0 7 - $ 2 7 , 0 3 1 - 5 . 5 % 11 3 0 I N S U R A N C E - E M P L O Y E E L I F E $ 1 5 , 9 8 5 $ 2 1 , 7 5 6 $ 1 7 , 2 4 6 - $ 4 , 5 1 0 - 2 0 . 7 % 11 3 1 I N S U R A N C E - W O R K M E N S C O M P $ 1 9 , 9 1 6 $ 2 7 , 1 0 9 $ 2 7 , 8 6 6 $ 7 5 7 2 . 8 % 11 3 2 I N S U R A N C E - U N E M P L O Y M E N T $ 9 2 3 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 3 5 H E A L T H I N S U R A N C E $ 3 6 5 , 9 8 3 $ 3 3 3 , 0 0 0 $ 3 0 6 , 0 0 0 - $ 2 7 , 0 0 0 - 8 . 1 % SA L A R I E S & B E N E F I T S $ 4 , 0 9 3 , 8 2 9 $ 4 , 4 2 7 , 9 5 1 $ 4 , 1 8 8 , 6 7 7 - $ 2 3 9 , 2 7 4 - 5 . 4 % 20 2 9 C L O T H I N G A L L O W A N C E $ 3 6 , 6 8 7 $ 2 7 , 7 7 0 $ 3 5 , 4 0 0 $ 7 , 6 3 0 2 7 . 5 % 20 6 0 P R O T E C T I V E C L O T H G & S U P P $ 1 6 , 5 0 4 $ 2 4 , 0 2 0 $ 4 , 1 0 0 - $ 1 9 , 9 2 0 - 8 2 . 9 % 21 0 0 O F F I C E S U P P L I E S $ 4 , 1 4 6 $ 4 , 0 0 0 $ 4 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 23 1 8 C O M P U T E R S U P P L I E S $ 8 0 $ 5 0 0 $ 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 23 2 0 G A S , O I L & G R E A S E $ 1 7 , 1 9 9 $ 2 4 , 3 2 4 $ 2 1 , 5 7 4 - $ 2 , 7 5 0 - 1 1 . 3 % 23 4 5 M I C U D R U G S & S U P P L I E S $ 4 0 , 0 2 0 $ 3 4 , 3 0 0 $ 3 0 , 9 0 0 - $ 3 , 4 0 0 - 9 . 9 % 23 5 0 S U P P L I E S & M A T E R I A L S $ 1 5 , 5 7 7 $ 1 5 , 5 4 3 $ 1 4 , 0 0 0 - $ 1 , 5 4 3 - 9 . 9 % SU P P L I E S $ 1 3 0 , 2 1 3 $ 1 3 0 , 4 5 7 $ 1 1 0 , 4 7 4 - $ 1 9 , 9 8 3 - 1 5 . 3 % 30 1 0 P O S T A G E $ 3 8 1 $ 5 0 0 $ 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 6 0 P R O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 4 7 , 3 1 6 $ 9 0 , 3 6 0 $ 1 0 3 , 1 0 0 $ 1 2 , 7 4 0 1 4 . 1 % 30 6 3 P R O G R A M M I N G / M A I N T E N A N C E $ 2 7 , 9 7 8 $ 3 9 , 8 2 9 $ 3 9 , 9 7 0 $ 1 4 1 0 . 4 % 30 6 4 E M E R G E N C Y M A N A G E M E N T $ 6 , 9 0 6 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 $ 7 , 0 0 0 - $ 3 , 0 0 0 - 3 0 . 0 % 31 1 3 P R I N T I N G $ 4 5 4 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 $ 5 0 0 5 0 . 0 % 31 1 5 C O N T R A C T M A I N T E N A N C E $ 4 4 , 2 8 0 $ 5 4 , 8 5 5 $ 5 5 , 9 9 8 $ 1 , 1 4 3 2 . 1 % PR O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 1 2 7 , 3 1 5 $ 1 9 6 , 5 4 4 $ 2 0 8 , 0 6 8 $ 1 1 , 5 2 4 5 . 9 % 41 1 0 H E A T , L I G H T , W A T E R U T I L $ 5 5 , 6 0 5 $ 5 9 , 7 6 3 $ 6 2 , 6 2 1 $ 2 , 8 5 8 4 . 8 % 41 2 0 T E L E P H O N E S E R V I C E $ 1 5 , 5 4 1 $ 1 1 , 9 7 6 $ 1 2 , 9 1 6 $ 9 4 0 7 . 8 % UT I L I T I E S $ 7 1 , 1 4 6 $ 7 1 , 7 3 9 $ 7 5 , 5 3 7 $ 3 , 7 9 8 5 . 3 % 01 - 4 0 F I R E PAGE 24 OF 49Page 144 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 01 - 4 0 F I R E LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 55 0 0 I N S U R A N C E - A U T O L I A B I L I T Y $ 3 , 0 2 1 $ 3 , 0 2 1 $ 2 , 7 8 9 - $ 2 3 2 - 7 . 7 % 55 0 6 I N S U R A N C E - G E N E R A L L I A B I L I T Y $ 5 , 1 5 0 $ 5 , 1 5 0 $ 1 , 8 5 5 - $ 3 , 2 9 5 - 6 4 . 0 % IN S U R A N C E $ 8 , 1 7 1 $ 8 , 1 7 1 $ 4 , 6 4 4 - $ 3 , 5 2 7 - 4 3 . 2 % 61 9 0 A U T O R E P A I R S $ 2 4 , 4 8 1 $ 2 1 , 5 6 0 $ 2 1 , 5 6 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 61 9 5 E Q U I P M E N T M A I N T E N A N C E $ 7 1 , 6 4 4 $ 7 1 , 6 4 4 $ 6 5 , 5 3 3 - $ 6 , 1 1 1 - 8 . 5 % 62 0 0 E Q U I P R E P A I R S / N O N V E H I C L E $ 1 , 2 5 1 $ 3 , 0 0 0 $ 4 , 5 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 5 0 . 0 % 63 3 0 R A D I O S E R V I C E $ 0 $ 4 , 0 0 0 $ 4 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % OU T S I D E S E R V I C E S $ 9 7 , 3 7 6 $ 1 0 0 , 2 0 4 $ 9 5 , 5 9 3 - $ 4 , 6 1 1 - 4 . 6 % 71 5 0 D U E S & S U B S C R I P T I O N S $ 4 , 2 9 9 $ 4 , 8 6 5 $ 7 , 2 3 0 $ 2 , 3 6 5 4 8 . 6 % 71 6 2 E M P L O Y E E P H Y S I C A L S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 71 7 0 T R A V E L E X P E N S E $ 4 , 8 4 8 $ 1 5 , 9 7 0 $ 1 4 , 8 2 0 - $ 1 , 1 5 0 - 7 . 2 % 72 0 1 C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T B E L O W $ 5 0 $1 , 6 9 6 $ 4 , 4 0 0 $ 1 3 , 1 0 1 $ 8 , 7 0 1 1 9 7 . 8 % 72 0 2 M I C R O C O M P U T E R S O F T W A R E $ 0 $ 5 0 0 $ 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 72 2 1 O T H E R E X P E N S E $ 4 , 1 3 2 $ 1 , 5 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 % 72 4 0 T U I T I O N & T R A I N I N G $ 2 1 , 5 6 5 $ 3 1 , 4 0 6 $ 2 6 , 8 4 0 - $ 4 , 5 6 6 - 1 4 . 5 % 72 4 1 E M S C O N T I N U I N G E D U C A T I O N $ 1 6 , 7 6 9 $ 1 6 , 4 4 1 $ 1 7 , 0 7 6 $ 6 3 5 3 . 9 % 72 6 0 E Q U I P M E N T R E N T A L $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 74 7 5 I M P R O V E M E N T S - - U N D E R $ 5 0 0 0 $ 4 5 , 0 0 7 $ 2 , 0 0 0 $ 5 , 8 5 0 $ 3 , 8 5 0 1 9 2 . 5 % 77 2 5 F I R E P R E V E N T I O N $ 1 2 , 6 4 6 $ 1 2 , 8 7 0 $ 1 1 , 8 0 0 - $ 1 , 0 7 0 - 8 . 3 % OT H E R $ 1 1 0 , 9 6 2 $ 8 9 , 9 5 2 $ 1 0 0 , 2 1 7 $ 1 0 , 2 6 5 1 1 . 4 % 90 0 0 C A P I T A L E Q U I P M E N T R E P L A C E $ 8 7 , 8 0 8 $ 7 1 , 1 1 8 $ 7 7 , 1 3 3 $ 6 , 0 1 5 8 . 5 % 91 0 0 O F F I C E E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 91 1 0 R A D I O E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 92 0 1 M I C R O C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 93 5 5 F I R E F I G H T I N G E Q U I P - L I G H T $ 1 4 , 6 1 2 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 93 5 7 F I R E F I G H T I N G E Q U I P - M A J O R $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 93 6 0 M I C U E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 99 1 0 O F F I C E F U R N I T U R E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! CA P I T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S $ 1 0 2 , 4 2 0 $ 7 1 , 1 1 8 $ 7 7 , 1 3 3 $ 6 , 0 1 5 8 . 5 % TO T A L F I R E $ 4 , 7 4 1 , 4 3 2 $ 5 , 0 9 6 , 1 3 6 $ 4 , 8 6 0 , 3 4 2 - $ 2 3 5 , 7 9 4 - 4 . 6 % 01 - 4 0 F I R E PAGE 25 OF 49Page 145 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 01 - 5 0 P O L I C E LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 10 0 1 R E G U L A R E A R N I N G S $ 3 , 5 3 4 , 0 4 2 $ 3 , 6 8 3 , 7 1 4 $ 3 , 6 7 2 , 1 9 2 - $ 1 1 , 5 2 2 - 0 . 3 % 10 0 2 O V E R T I M E E A R N I N G S $ 3 3 1 , 6 4 1 $ 3 3 5 , 0 0 1 $ 3 0 6 , 5 9 0 - $ 2 8 , 4 1 1 - 8 . 5 % 10 0 4 M I S C E L L A N E O U S A L L O W A N C E S $ 9 , 2 8 3 $ 9 , 5 9 9 $ 7 , 8 0 0 - $ 1 , 7 9 9 - 1 8 . 7 % 10 0 5 L O N G E V I T Y P A Y $ 2 2 , 3 3 8 $ 2 6 , 2 4 4 $ 2 2 , 8 6 1 - $ 3 , 3 8 3 - 1 2 . 9 % 10 0 6 E D U C A T I O N P A Y $ 5 3 , 3 8 6 $ 5 3 , 7 0 3 $ 5 8 , 5 0 0 $ 4 , 7 9 7 8 . 9 % 10 0 7 C A R A L L O W A N C E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 10 0 8 H O U S I N G A L L O W A N C E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 10 0 9 C E L L P H O N E A L L O W A N C E $ 1 , 0 8 0 $ 1 , 0 8 0 $ 1 , 0 8 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 11 1 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E F . I . C . A . $ 2 9 1 , 9 3 2 $ 3 0 6 , 4 8 5 $ 3 1 0 , 0 6 7 $ 3 , 5 8 2 1 . 2 % 11 2 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E T . M . R . S . $ 5 4 1 , 4 6 1 $ 5 2 1 , 6 5 7 $ 4 1 7 , 2 8 9 - $ 1 0 4 , 3 6 8 - 2 0 . 0 % 11 3 0 I N S U R A N C E - E M P L O Y E E L I F E $ 2 0 , 7 0 4 $ 2 5 , 8 4 3 $ 2 3 , 0 2 5 - $ 2 , 8 1 8 - 1 0 . 9 % 11 3 1 I N S U R A N C E - W O R K M E N S C O M P $ 2 8 , 9 5 6 $ 3 8 , 5 1 4 $ 3 9 , 5 0 1 $ 9 8 7 2 . 6 % 11 3 2 I N S U R A N C E - U N E M P L O Y M E N T $ 3 , 5 4 8 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 3 5 H E A L T H I N S U R A N C E $ 5 3 2 , 0 0 5 $ 4 5 9 , 0 0 0 $ 4 5 0 , 0 0 0 - $ 9 , 0 0 0 - 2 . 0 % SA L A R I E S & B E N E F I T S $ 5 , 3 7 0 , 3 7 6 $ 5 , 4 6 0 , 8 4 0 $ 5 , 3 0 8 , 9 0 5 - $ 1 5 1 , 9 3 5 - 2 . 8 % 20 2 9 C L O T H I N G A L L O W A N C E $ 2 3 , 5 9 6 $ 3 4 , 7 0 5 $ 3 6 , 2 0 5 $ 1 , 5 0 0 4 . 3 % 21 0 0 O F F I C E S U P P L I E S $ 1 2 , 4 6 3 $ 9 , 5 0 0 $ 9 , 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 23 1 8 C O M P U T E R S U P P L I E S $ 3 5 9 $ 3 , 0 0 0 $ 3 , 1 0 0 $ 1 0 0 3 . 3 % 23 2 0 G A S , O I L & G R E A S E $ 6 5 , 0 9 5 $ 8 8 , 9 7 0 $ 9 2 , 7 1 4 $ 3 , 7 4 4 4 . 2 % 23 5 0 S U P P L I E S & M A T E R I A L S $ 1 2 , 6 8 0 $ 1 5 , 1 7 5 $ 1 6 , 1 7 5 $ 1 , 0 0 0 6 . 6 % SU P P L I E S $ 1 1 4 , 1 9 3 $ 1 5 1 , 3 5 0 $ 1 5 7 , 6 9 4 $ 6 , 3 4 4 4 . 2 % 30 1 0 P O S T A G E $ 1 , 4 6 9 $ 3 , 6 5 0 $ 3 , 6 5 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 1 1 D E T E N T I O N S E R V I C E S $ 2 , 5 9 6 $ 8 , 1 0 0 $ 8 , 1 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 1 4 P U B L I C A T I O N S $ 1 9 2 $ 4 , 1 1 0 $ 4 , 1 1 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 6 0 P R O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 2 2 0 , 3 4 8 $ 2 3 3 , 7 0 3 $ 2 3 3 , 7 0 3 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 6 2 A N I M A L C O N T R O L S E R V I C E S $ 8 , 6 7 0 $ 1 2 , 8 7 5 $ 1 2 , 8 7 5 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 6 3 P R O G R A M M I N G / M A I N T E N A N C E $ 1 0 7 , 0 2 3 $ 1 2 8 , 4 9 8 $ 1 2 7 , 4 2 8 - $ 1 , 0 7 0 - 0 . 8 % 30 7 0 S P E C I A L O P E R A T I O N S $ 5 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 7 2 A C C R E D I T A T I O N E X P E N S E S $ 1 5 , 2 7 2 $ 1 5 , 3 0 0 $ 1 6 , 4 5 0 $ 1 , 1 5 0 7 . 5 % 30 7 5 D I R E C T A L A R M M O N I T O R I N G $ 4 9 , 2 7 7 $ 6 6 , 5 8 9 $ 4 7 , 9 8 9 - $ 1 8 , 6 0 0 - 2 7 . 9 % 01 - 5 0 P O L I C E PAGE 26 OF 49Page 146 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 01 - 5 0 P O L I C E LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 31 1 3 P R I N T I N G $ 1 , 3 0 7 $ 1 1 , 1 0 0 $ 1 1 , 1 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 31 1 5 C O N T R A C T M A I N T E N A N C E $ 3 2 , 2 4 8 $ 3 1 , 5 8 0 $ 3 4 , 5 0 4 $ 2 , 9 2 4 9 . 3 % 32 6 1 W R E C K E R F E E S $ 0 $ 5 0 0 $ 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 32 9 1 G U N S / E Q U I P M E N T $ 7 , 2 4 3 $ 2 1 , 4 3 5 $ 2 3 , 5 3 5 $ 2 , 1 0 0 9 . 8 % PR O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 4 4 5 , 6 9 5 $ 5 3 8 , 4 4 0 $ 5 2 4 , 9 4 4 - $ 1 3 , 4 9 6 - 2 . 5 % 41 1 0 H E A T , L I G H T , W A T E R U T I L $ 6 3 , 9 1 5 $ 6 9 , 6 1 2 $ 7 0 , 8 9 0 $ 1 , 2 7 8 1 . 8 % 41 2 0 T E L E P H O N E S E R V I C E $ 4 6 , 7 5 6 $ 5 0 , 5 2 1 $ 5 1 , 9 3 8 $ 1 , 4 1 7 2 . 8 % 41 2 1 9 1 1 S E R V I C E F E E S $ 4 7 , 2 4 3 $ 1 0 5 , 8 5 0 $ 1 4 8 , 9 6 0 $ 4 3 , 1 1 0 4 0 . 7 % UT I L I T I E S $ 1 5 7 , 9 1 4 $ 2 2 5 , 9 8 3 $ 2 7 1 , 7 8 8 $ 4 5 , 8 0 5 2 0 . 3 % 55 0 0 I N S U R A N C E - A U T O L I A B I L I T Y $ 6 , 9 3 1 $ 6 , 9 3 1 $ 6 , 3 9 8 - $ 5 3 3 - 7 . 7 % 55 0 6 I N S U R A N C E - G E N E R A L L I A B I L I T Y $ 6 , 2 3 8 $ 6 , 2 3 8 $ 2 , 2 4 7 - $ 3 , 9 9 1 - 6 4 . 0 % 55 0 8 I N S U R A N C E - P O L I C E P R O F L I A $ 1 2 , 0 0 0 $ 1 2 , 0 0 0 $ 1 4 , 0 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 1 6 . 7 % IN S U R A N C E $ 2 5 , 1 6 9 $ 2 5 , 1 6 9 $ 2 2 , 6 4 5 - $ 2 , 5 2 4 - 1 0 . 0 % 61 9 0 A U T O R E P A I R S $ 2 7 , 4 2 0 $ 3 9 , 7 0 7 $ 3 9 , 7 0 7 $ 0 0 . 0 % 61 9 5 E Q U I P M E N T M A I N T E N A N C E $ 9 6 , 8 7 3 $ 9 6 , 8 7 2 $ 1 4 7 , 9 2 9 $ 5 1 , 0 5 7 5 2 . 7 % 62 0 0 E Q U I P R E P A I R S / N O N V E H I C L E $ 4 , 1 3 7 $ 4 , 2 0 0 $ 4 , 2 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 63 3 0 R A D I O S E R V I C E $ 5 , 2 2 5 $ 2 , 4 0 0 $ 2 , 4 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % OU T S I D E S E R V I C E S $ 1 3 3 , 6 5 5 $ 1 4 3 , 1 7 9 $ 1 9 4 , 2 3 6 $ 5 1 , 0 5 7 3 5 . 7 % 71 5 0 D U E S & S U B S C R I P T I O N S $ 1 , 9 8 4 $ 5 , 6 9 4 $ 6 , 0 5 4 $ 3 6 0 6 . 3 % 71 6 2 E M P L O Y E E P H Y S I C A L S $ 0 $ 4 , 0 0 0 $ 4 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 71 7 0 T R A V E L E X P E N S E $ 1 7 , 1 8 3 $ 1 9 , 9 8 0 $ 2 2 , 0 8 0 $ 2 , 1 0 0 1 0 . 5 % 72 0 1 C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T B E L O W $ 5 0 $1 1 , 7 4 2 $ 6 , 6 0 0 $ 1 6 , 9 0 9 $ 1 0 , 3 0 9 1 5 6 . 2 % 72 0 2 M I C R O C O M P U T E R S O F T W A R E $ 1 5 , 3 3 5 $ 1 0 , 3 5 0 $ 1 0 , 3 5 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 72 2 1 O T H E R E X P E N S E $ 7 , 6 5 2 $ 7 , 5 0 0 $ 7 , 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 72 2 3 C R I M E P R E V / Y O U T H S E R V I C E S $ 7 7 1 $ 2 , 8 0 0 $ 2 , 8 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 72 4 0 T U I T I O N & T R A I N I N G $ 2 5 , 9 2 0 $ 2 6 , 3 6 0 $ 2 6 , 9 1 0 $ 5 5 0 2 . 1 % 72 6 0 E Q U I P M E N T R E N T A L $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 74 7 5 I M P R O V E M E N T S - - U N D E R $ 5 0 0 0 $ 6 2 , 3 1 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 01 - 5 0 P O L I C E PAGE 27 OF 49Page 147 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 01 - 5 0 P O L I C E LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % OT H E R $ 1 4 2 , 8 9 7 $ 8 3 , 2 8 4 $ 9 6 , 6 0 3 $ 1 3 , 3 1 9 1 6 . 0 % 90 0 0 C A P I T A L E Q U I P M E N T R E P L A C E $ 6 8 , 0 8 8 $ 6 6 , 4 5 9 $ 7 5 , 1 0 7 $ 8 , 6 4 8 1 3 . 0 % 91 0 0 O F F I C E E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 91 1 0 R A D I O E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 92 0 1 M I C R O C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 # D I V / 0 ! 99 1 0 O F F I C E F U R N I T U R E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! CA P I T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S $ 1 5 9 , 0 1 9 $ 7 3 , 4 8 3 $ 9 0 , 1 0 7 $ 1 6 , 6 2 4 2 2 . 6 % TO T A L P O L I C E $ 6 , 5 4 8 , 9 1 8 $ 6 , 7 0 1 , 7 2 8 $ 6 , 6 6 6 , 9 2 2 - $ 3 4 , 8 0 6 - 0 . 5 % 01 - 5 0 P O L I C E PAGE 28 OF 49Page 148 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 01 - 7 0 P A R K S LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 10 0 1 R E G U L A R E A R N I N G S $ 1 , 3 2 3 , 9 3 5 $ 1 , 3 5 8 , 1 0 5 $ 1 , 3 2 7 , 4 0 1 - $ 3 0 , 7 0 4 - 2 . 3 % 10 0 2 O V E R T I M E E A R N I N G S $ 7 9 , 3 0 1 $ 4 8 , 3 5 0 $ 7 8 , 8 2 5 $ 3 0 , 4 7 5 6 3 . 0 % 10 0 5 L O N G E V I T Y P A Y $ 1 5 , 6 8 8 $ 1 6 , 5 2 8 $ 1 6 , 8 2 7 $ 2 9 9 1 . 8 % 10 0 7 C A R A L L O W A N C E $ 1 4 , 4 0 0 $ 1 4 , 4 0 0 $ 1 4 , 4 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 10 0 9 C E L L P H O N E A L L O W A N C E $ 9 6 0 $ 9 6 0 $ 9 6 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 11 1 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E F . I . C . A . $ 1 0 6 , 3 7 3 $ 1 0 7 , 8 0 7 $ 1 0 7 , 9 2 1 $ 1 1 4 0 . 1 % 11 2 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E T . M . R . S . $ 2 0 0 , 1 1 3 $ 1 9 1 , 2 3 7 $ 1 5 0 , 1 8 9 - $ 4 1 , 0 4 8 - 2 1 . 5 % 11 3 0 I N S U R A N C E - E M P L O Y E E L I F E $ 8 , 3 6 3 $ 9 , 4 7 3 $ 8 , 8 0 2 - $ 6 7 1 - 7 . 1 % 11 3 1 I N S U R A N C E - W O R K M E N S C O M P $ 1 1 , 6 3 5 $ 1 5 , 2 4 6 $ 1 6 , 1 5 3 $ 9 0 7 5 . 9 % 11 3 2 I N S U R A N C E - U N E M P L O Y M E N T $ 3 , 0 5 8 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 3 5 H E A L T H I N S U R A N C E $ 2 4 2 , 1 5 4 $ 2 1 6 , 0 0 0 $ 1 8 9 , 0 0 0 - $ 2 7 , 0 0 0 - 1 2 . 5 % SA L A R I E S & B E N E F I T S $ 2 , 0 0 5 , 9 8 0 $ 1 , 9 7 8 , 1 0 6 $ 1 , 9 1 0 , 4 7 8 - $ 6 7 , 6 2 8 - 3 . 4 % 20 2 9 C L O T H I N G A L L O W A N C E $ 1 5 , 1 8 8 $ 1 3 , 6 6 5 $ 1 4 , 2 2 2 $ 5 5 7 4 . 1 % 21 0 0 O F F I C E S U P P L I E S $ 1 , 7 4 8 $ 2 , 5 0 0 $ 2 , 5 5 0 $ 5 0 2 . 0 % 23 1 8 C O M P U T E R S U P P L I E S $ 5 7 3 $ 5 0 0 $ 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 23 2 0 G A S , O I L & G R E A S E $ 2 0 , 7 4 9 $ 2 7 , 3 5 3 $ 2 9 , 3 8 0 $ 2 , 0 2 7 7 . 4 % 23 5 0 S U P P L I E S & M A T E R I A L S $ 5 7 , 9 0 3 $ 4 6 , 3 0 0 $ 4 8 , 2 0 0 $ 1 , 9 0 0 4 . 1 % 23 6 0 S M A L L T O O L S $ 9 , 7 2 2 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 1 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 1 0 . 0 % 23 8 1 F E R T I L I Z E R , C H E M I C A L S & S U P $ 5 1 , 5 8 9 $ 5 5 , 0 0 0 $ 6 0 , 0 0 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 9 . 1 % SU P P L I E S $ 1 5 7 , 4 7 2 $ 1 5 5 , 3 1 8 $ 1 6 5 , 8 5 2 $ 1 0 , 5 3 4 6 . 8 % 30 1 0 P O S T A G E $ 1 , 2 2 0 $ 4 5 0 $ 6 0 0 $ 1 5 0 3 3 . 3 % 30 6 0 P R O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 3 , 1 9 5 $ 7 , 0 0 0 $ 8 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 1 4 . 3 % 30 6 3 P R O G R A M M I N G / M A I N T E N A N C E $ 5 , 3 3 4 $ 6 , 0 0 0 $ 6 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 6 5 C R E D I T C A R D F E E S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 31 1 3 P R I N T I N G $ 5 3 4 $ 8 0 0 $ 8 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 31 1 5 C O N T R A C T M A I N T E N A N C E $ 2 0 5 , 6 7 3 $ 2 0 1 , 8 1 0 $ 2 4 4 , 8 1 0 $ 4 3 , 0 0 0 2 1 . 3 % PR O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 2 1 5 , 9 5 6 $ 2 1 6 , 0 6 0 $ 2 6 0 , 2 1 0 $ 4 4 , 1 5 0 2 0 . 4 % 41 1 0 H E A T , L I G H T , W A T E R U T I L $ 9 6 , 9 4 7 $ 9 3 , 9 0 1 $ 1 3 0 , 4 3 0 $ 3 6 , 5 2 9 3 8 . 9 % 41 2 0 T E L E P H O N E S E R V I C E $ 7 , 6 7 8 $ 7 , 0 6 7 $ 6 , 5 0 3 - $ 5 6 4 - 8 . 0 % UT I L I T I E S $ 1 0 4 , 6 2 5 $ 1 0 0 , 9 6 8 $ 1 3 6 , 9 3 3 $ 3 5 , 9 6 5 3 5 . 6 % 01 - 7 0 P A R K S PAGE 29 OF 49Page 149 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 01 - 7 0 P A R K S LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 55 0 0 I N S U R A N C E - A U T O L I A B I L I T Y $ 7 , 3 7 6 $ 7 , 3 7 6 $ 6 , 8 0 9 - $ 5 6 7 - 7 . 7 % 55 0 6 I N S U R A N C E - G E N E R A L L I A B I L I T Y $ 3 , 1 4 6 $ 3 , 1 4 6 $ 1 , 1 3 3 - $ 2 , 0 1 3 - 6 4 . 0 % IN S U R A N C E $ 1 0 , 5 2 2 $ 1 0 , 5 2 2 $ 7 , 9 4 2 - $ 2 , 5 8 0 - 2 4 . 5 % 61 8 4 S E C U R I T Y E X P E N S E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 61 9 0 A U T O R E P A I R S $ 1 5 , 5 4 2 $ 1 7 , 8 6 1 $ 1 7 , 8 6 1 $ 0 0 . 0 % 61 9 5 E Q U I P M E N T M A I N T E N A N C E $ 1 0 1 , 0 7 1 $ 1 0 1 , 0 7 1 $ 1 0 8 , 6 7 5 $ 7 , 6 0 4 7 . 5 % 62 0 0 E Q U I P R E P A I R S / N O N V E H I C L E $ 7 , 9 7 1 $ 6 , 2 5 0 $ 6 , 2 5 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 62 0 5 P A R K F A C I L I T Y R E P A I R $ 3 0 , 7 3 1 $ 3 1 , 0 0 0 $ 3 1 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 62 0 8 P A R K E Q U I P M E N T R E P A I R $ 2 0 , 3 2 7 $ 2 0 , 0 0 0 $ 2 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 63 8 0 F L O W E R S , T R E E S & S H R U B S $ 4 9 , 5 9 6 $ 4 9 , 0 0 0 $ 5 1 , 0 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 4 . 1 % OU T S I D E S E R V I C E S $ 2 2 5 , 2 3 8 $ 2 2 5 , 1 8 2 $ 2 3 4 , 7 8 6 $ 9 , 6 0 4 4 . 3 % 71 5 0 D U E S & S U B S C R I P T I O N S $ 1 , 2 4 6 $ 2 , 1 8 0 $ 2 , 1 8 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 71 7 0 T R A V E L E X P E N S E $ 3 , 0 1 2 $ 2 , 9 6 0 $ 3 , 0 1 0 $ 5 0 1 . 7 % 72 0 1 C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T B E L O W $ 5 0 $3 , 3 4 1 $ 3 , 1 0 0 $ 3 , 1 9 9 $ 9 9 3 . 2 % 72 0 2 M I C R O C O M P U T E R S O F T W A R E $ 4 , 4 1 1 $ 6 , 0 5 0 $ 6 , 0 5 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 72 2 1 O T H E R E X P E N S E $ 2 , 1 8 2 $ 3 , 0 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 72 4 0 T U I T I O N & T R A I N I N G $ 2 , 5 3 7 $ 3 , 3 4 5 $ 3 , 3 9 5 $ 5 0 1 . 5 % 72 6 0 E Q U I P M E N T R E N T A L $ 2 5 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 74 7 5 I M P R O V E M E N T S - - U N D E R $ 5 0 0 0 $ 3 8 , 9 4 9 $ 3 1 , 0 0 0 $ 3 1 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % OT H E R $ 5 5 , 9 2 8 $ 5 2 , 6 3 5 $ 5 2 , 8 3 4 $ 1 9 9 0 . 4 % 90 0 0 C A P I T A L E Q U I P M E N T R E P L A C E $ 4 0 , 2 3 5 $ 3 3 , 6 1 3 $ 3 9 , 9 7 5 $ 6 , 3 6 2 1 8 . 9 % 91 0 0 O F F I C E E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 92 0 1 M I C R O C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 95 6 0 L A N D S C A P E E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 99 0 0 P A R K I M P R O V E M E N T S $ 0 $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 99 1 0 O F F I C E F U R N I T U R E $ 0 $ 5 0 0 $ 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % CA P I T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S $ 4 0 , 2 3 5 $ 5 9 , 1 1 3 $ 6 5 , 4 7 5 $ 6 , 3 6 2 1 0 . 8 % TO T A L P A R K S $ 2 , 8 1 5 , 9 5 6 $ 2 , 7 9 7 , 9 0 4 $ 2 , 8 3 4 , 5 1 0 $ 3 6 , 6 0 6 1 . 3 % 01 - 7 0 P A R K S PAGE 30 OF 49Page 150 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 01 - 7 5 S W I M M I N G P O O L LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L B U D G E T P R O P O S E D CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 10 0 1 R E G U L A R E A R N I N G S $ 1 4 3 , 1 4 8 $ 1 4 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 6 9 , 4 7 6 $ 2 9 , 4 7 6 2 1 . 1 % 10 0 2 O V E R T I M E E A R N I N G S $ 8 , 6 4 3 $ 5 , 0 2 5 $ 7 , 6 5 2 $ 2 , 6 2 7 5 2 . 3 % 11 1 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E F . I . C . A . $ 1 1 , 6 1 2 $ 1 1 , 2 9 4 $ 1 3 , 3 1 4 $ 2 , 0 2 0 1 7 . 9 % 11 2 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E T . M . R . S . $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 3 1 I N S U R A N C E - W O R K M E N S C O M P $ 0 $ 0 $ 2 , 2 6 2 $ 2 , 2 6 2 # D I V / 0 ! SA L A R I E S & B E N E F I T S $ 1 6 3 , 4 0 3 $ 1 5 6 , 3 1 9 $ 1 9 2 , 7 0 4 $ 3 6 , 3 8 5 23 . 3 % 30 1 0 P O S T A G E $ 5 4 1 $ 9 8 2 $ 9 8 2 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 6 0 P R O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! PR O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 5 4 1 $ 9 8 2 $ 9 8 2 $ 0 0.0% 41 1 0 H E A T , L I G H T , W A T E R U T I L $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 41 2 0 T E L E P H O N E S E R V I C E $ 0 $ 1 , 5 0 7 $ 1 , 5 0 7 $ 0 0 . 0 % UT I L I T I E S $ 0 $ 1 , 5 0 7 $ 1 , 5 0 7 $ 0 0.0% 61 8 9 S W I M M I N G P O O L R E P A I R S $ 1 7 , 0 5 6 $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 $ 1 8 , 0 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 2 0 . 0 % OU T S I D E S E R V I C E S $ 1 7 , 0 5 6 $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 $ 1 8 , 0 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 20 . 0 % 72 0 1 C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T B E L O W $ 5 0 $0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 73 9 0 S W I M M I N G P O O L E X P E N S E $ 5 2 , 8 3 2 $ 4 6 , 3 9 0 $ 5 6 , 3 9 0 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 2 1 . 6 % 74 7 5 I M P R O V E M E N T S - - U N D E R $ 5 0 0 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! OT H E R $ 5 2 , 8 3 2 $ 4 6 , 3 9 0 $ 5 6 , 3 9 0 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 21 . 6 % 92 0 1 M I C R O C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 95 6 5 S W I M M I N G P O O L E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! CA P I T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 #D I V / 0 ! TO T A L S W I M M I N G P O O L $ 2 3 3 , 8 3 2 $ 2 2 0 , 1 9 8 $ 2 6 9 , 5 8 3 $ 4 9 , 3 8 5 22 . 4 % 01 - 7 5 S W I M M I N G P O O L PAGE 31 OF 49Page 151 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 0 B U D G E T 01 - 8 0 S T R E E T S LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L B U D G E T P R O P O S E D CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 10 0 1 R E G U L A R E A R N I N G S $ 7 6 2 , 5 9 3 $ 7 8 7 , 6 3 9 $ 7 8 4 , 8 9 8 - $ 2 , 7 4 1 - 0 . 3 % 10 0 2 O V E R T I M E E A R N I N G S $ 2 8 , 8 0 5 $ 1 5 , 7 5 3 $ 1 9 , 2 7 9 $ 3 , 5 2 6 2 2 . 4 % 10 0 5 L O N G E V I T Y P A Y $ 1 1 , 5 3 8 $ 1 2 , 2 8 4 $ 1 1 , 9 9 0 - $ 2 9 4 - 2 . 4 % 10 0 7 C A R A L L O W A N C E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 10 0 9 C E L L P H O N E A L L O W A N C E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 1 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E F . I . C . A . $ 6 0 , 7 5 0 $ 6 2 , 3 9 9 $ 6 2 , 4 3 9 $ 4 0 0 . 1 % 11 2 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E T . M . R . S . $ 1 1 2 , 4 1 9 $ 1 0 8 , 4 8 3 $ 8 5 , 6 9 7 - $ 2 2 , 7 8 6 - 2 1 . 0 % 11 3 0 I N S U R A N C E - E M P L O Y E E L I F E $ 5 , 4 9 2 $ 5 , 4 3 0 $ 5 , 2 0 4 - $ 2 2 6 - 4 . 2 % 11 3 1 I N S U R A N C E - W O R K M E N S C O M P $ 2 5 , 3 5 3 $ 2 6 , 3 3 9 $ 2 6 , 1 1 8 - $ 2 2 1 - 0 . 8 % 11 3 2 I N S U R A N C E - U N E M P L O Y M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 3 5 H E A L T H I N S U R A N C E $ 1 6 5 , 1 0 5 $ 1 4 4 , 0 0 0 $ 1 4 4 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % SA L A R I E S & B E N E F I T S $ 1 , 1 7 2 , 0 5 5 $ 1 , 1 6 2 , 3 2 5 $ 1 , 1 3 9 , 6 2 5 - $ 2 2 , 7 0 0 -2 . 0 % 20 2 9 C L O T H I N G A L L O W A N C E $ 1 1 , 4 1 3 $ 1 1 , 9 2 1 $ 1 1 , 9 2 1 $ 0 0 . 0 % 21 0 0 O F F I C E S U P P L I E S $ 9 5 6 $ 9 0 0 $ 9 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 23 1 8 C O M P U T E R S U P P L I E S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 23 2 0 G A S , O I L & G R E A S E $ 3 3 , 4 0 6 $ 4 5 , 7 4 4 $ 5 0 , 3 8 7 $ 4 , 6 4 3 1 0 . 1 % 23 5 0 S U P P L I E S & M A T E R I A L S $ 9 , 1 8 4 $ 9 , 6 0 0 $ 9 , 6 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 23 6 0 S M A L L T O O L S $ 1 6 , 5 0 1 $ 5 , 8 0 0 $ 6 , 3 0 0 $ 5 0 0 8 . 6 % SU P P L I E S $ 7 1 , 4 6 0 $ 7 3 , 9 6 5 $ 7 9 , 1 0 8 $ 5 , 1 4 3 7. 0 % 30 1 0 P O S T A G E $ 9 3 $ 5 3 $ 5 3 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 6 0 P R O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 6 3 P R O G R A M M I N G / M A I N T E N A N C E $ 6 9 4 $ 1 , 7 3 4 $ 1 , 7 3 4 $ 0 0 . 0 % 31 1 3 P R I N T I N G $ 0 $ 2 0 0 $ 2 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 31 1 5 C O N T R A C T M A I N T E N A N C E $ 5 3 , 4 5 0 $ 3 , 9 0 4 $ 2 , 8 2 4 - $ 1 , 0 8 0 - 2 7 . 7 % PR O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 5 4 , 2 3 7 $ 7 , 3 9 1 $ 6 , 3 1 1 - $ 1 , 0 8 0 -1 4 . 6 % 41 1 0 H E A T , L I G H T , W A T E R U T I L $ 3 , 8 9 2 $ 4 , 0 9 6 $ 4 , 3 2 2 $ 2 2 6 5 . 5 % 41 2 0 T E L E P H O N E S E R V I C E $ 2 , 7 7 3 $ 2 , 4 5 1 $ 2 , 4 5 1 $ 0 0 . 0 % UT I L I T I E S $ 6 , 6 6 5 $ 6 , 5 4 7 $ 6 , 7 7 3 $ 2 2 6 3. 5 % 55 0 0 I N S U R A N C E - A U T O L I A B I L I T Y $ 1 0 , 1 3 0 $ 1 0 , 1 3 0 $ 9 , 3 5 1 - $ 7 7 9 - 7 . 7 % 55 0 6 I N S U R A N C E - G E N E R A L L I A B I L I T Y $ 2 , 5 8 2 $ 2 , 5 8 2 $ 9 3 0 - $ 1 , 6 5 2 - 6 4 . 0 % 01 - 8 0 S T R E E T S PAGE 32 OF 49Page 152 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 0 B U D G E T 01 - 8 0 S T R E E T S LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L B U D G E T P R O P O S E D CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % IN S U R A N C E $ 1 2 , 7 1 2 $ 1 2 , 7 1 2 $ 1 0 , 2 8 1 - $ 2 , 4 3 1 -1 9 . 1 % 61 9 0 A U T O R E P A I R S $ 4 6 , 9 4 8 $ 5 3 , 8 9 7 $ 5 3 , 8 9 7 $ 0 0 . 0 % 61 9 5 E Q U I P M E N T M A I N T E N A N C E $ 1 6 7 , 1 2 0 $ 1 6 7 , 1 2 0 $ 1 5 1 , 1 1 7 - $ 1 6 , 0 0 3 - 9 . 6 % 62 0 0 E Q U I P R E P A I R S / N O N V E H I C L E $ 2 7 2 $ 6 7 5 $ 6 7 5 $ 0 0 . 0 % 63 7 0 S T R E E T R E P A I R M A T E R I A L $ 2 3 0 , 1 3 9 $ 1 7 9 , 5 7 5 $ 1 7 9 , 5 7 5 $ 0 0 . 0 % 63 7 1 R E P A V I N G O U T S I D E C O N T R A C T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 63 7 5 S I D E W A L K R E P A I R R E I M B U R S E M E N $ 3 1 , 1 6 8 $ 6 5 , 0 0 0 $ 6 5 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % OU T S I D E S E R V I C E S $ 4 7 5 , 6 4 7 $ 4 6 6 , 2 6 7 $ 4 5 0 , 2 6 4 - $ 1 6 , 0 0 3 -3 . 4 % 71 5 0 D U E S & S U B S C R I P T I O N S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 71 7 0 T R A V E L E X P E N S E $ 0 $ 3 3 0 $ 0 - $ 3 3 0 - 1 0 0 . 0 % 72 0 1 C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T B E L O W $ 5 0 $0 $ 0 $ 1 , 3 6 5 $ 1 , 3 6 5 # D I V / 0 ! 72 0 2 M I C R O C O M P U T E R S O F T W A R E $ 8 6 3 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 72 2 1 O T H E R E X P E N S E $ 3 3 2 $ 1 , 5 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 72 4 0 T U I T I O N & T R A I N I N G $ 2 2 2 $ 2 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 - $ 5 0 0 - 2 5 . 0 % 72 6 0 E Q U I P M E N T R E N T A L $ 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 74 7 5 I M P R O V E M E N T S - - U N D E R $ 5 0 0 0 $ 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 $ 0 - $ 3 , 0 0 0 - 1 0 0 . 0 % OT H E R $ 1 , 4 1 7 $ 7 , 8 3 0 $ 5 , 3 6 5 - $ 2 , 4 6 5 -3 1 . 5 % 90 0 0 C A P I T A L E Q U I P M E N T R E P L A C E $ 7 8 , 3 6 9 $ 5 9 , 5 3 4 $ 5 8 , 5 0 7 - $ 1 , 0 2 7 - 1 . 7 % 91 0 0 O F F I C E E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 91 1 5 S M A L L E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 92 0 1 M I C R O C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 99 1 0 O F F I C E F U R N I T U R E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! CA P I T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S $ 7 8 , 3 6 9 $ 5 9 , 5 3 4 $ 5 8 , 5 0 7 - $ 1 , 0 2 7 -1 . 7 % TO T A L S T R E E T S $ 1 , 8 7 2 , 5 6 2 $ 1 , 7 9 6 , 5 7 1 $ 1 , 7 5 6 , 2 3 4 - $ 4 0 , 3 3 7 -2 . 2 % 01 - 8 0 S T R E E T S PAGE 33 OF 49Page 153 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 01 - 8 5 T R A N S F E R S LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 63 7 1 R E P A V I N G O U T S I D E C O N T R A C T $ 6 1 7 , 8 2 0 $ 6 1 7 , 8 1 6 $ 6 1 7 , 8 1 6 $ 0 0 . 0 % OU T S I D E S E R V I C E S $ 6 1 7 , 8 2 0 $ 6 1 7 , 8 1 6 $ 6 1 7 , 8 1 6 $ 0 #D I V / 0 ! 71 5 3 C A P I T A L P R O J E C T S C O N T R I B $ 1 , 0 8 4 , 7 6 4 $ 1 , 0 8 4 , 7 5 8 $ 1 , 0 8 4 , 7 5 8 $ 0 0 . 0 % OT H E R $ 1 , 0 8 4 , 7 6 4 $ 1 , 0 8 4 , 7 5 8 $ 1 , 0 8 4 , 7 5 8 $ 0 #D I V / 0 ! 85 0 0 T R A N S F E R S $ 1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! TR A N S F E R S $ 1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 #D I V / 0 ! 95 8 2 C U R B & G U T T E R $ 9 7 7 , 4 3 6 $ 9 7 7 , 4 4 0 $ 9 7 7 , 4 4 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 98 0 0 A L L E Y R E P L A C E M E N T P R O J E C T $ 3 5 2 , 1 7 6 $ 3 5 2 , 1 7 3 $ 3 5 2 , 1 7 3 $ 0 0 . 0 % CA P I T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S $ 1 , 3 2 9 , 6 1 2 $ 1 , 3 2 9 , 6 1 3 $ 1 , 3 2 9 , 6 1 3 $ 0 #D I V / 0 ! TO T A L T R A N S F E R S $ 4 , 0 3 2 , 1 9 6 $ 3 , 0 3 2 , 1 8 7 $ 3 , 0 3 2 , 1 8 7 $ 0 #D I V / 0 ! 01 - 8 5 T R A N S F E R S G F PAGE 34 OF 49Page 154 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 02 - 1 1 R E V E N U E S LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 34 5 0 W A T E R S A L E S - R E S I D E N T I A L $ 5 , 9 3 2 , 2 1 4 $ 6 , 7 3 1 , 1 9 6 $ 6 , 6 7 0 , 9 3 0 - $ 6 0 , 2 6 6 - 0 . 9 % 34 5 1 W A T E R S A L E S - C O M M E R C I A L $ 2 6 7 , 3 4 2 $ 2 5 9 , 6 1 9 $ 2 6 7 , 0 3 9 $ 7 , 4 2 0 2 . 9 % 34 5 2 W A T E R S A L E S - C H U R C H / S C H O O L $ 2 8 0 , 6 3 6 $ 3 3 1 , 2 5 5 $ 3 3 8 , 2 2 0 $ 6 , 9 6 5 2 . 1 % 35 2 1 W A T E R S A L E S - S M U $ 6 9 9 , 1 9 4 $ 8 0 5 , 8 5 8 $ 7 9 3 , 1 7 0 - $ 1 2 , 6 8 8 - 1 . 6 % 35 2 2 W A T E R S A L E S - P A R K S / C I T Y $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 35 2 3 M E T E R I N S T A L L A T I O N $ 8 5 , 3 4 5 $ 9 5 , 6 0 0 $ 9 5 , 6 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 35 2 4 W A T E R R E C O N N E C T I O N S $ 1 2 4 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 35 2 5 T E S T I N G F E E S $ 8 7 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! SU B T O T A L W A T E R R E V E N U E S $ 7 , 2 6 5 , 7 2 5 $ 8 , 2 2 3 , 5 2 8 $ 8 , 1 6 4 , 9 5 9 - $ 5 8 , 5 6 9 # D I V / 0 ! 35 3 2 S E W E R C H R G - S M U $ 3 5 3 , 9 7 8 $ 3 5 3 , 9 7 8 $ 3 7 5 , 8 4 1 $ 2 1 , 8 6 3 6 . 2 % 35 3 3 S E W E R P E R M I T S $ 1 8 2 , 3 3 3 $ 3 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 3 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 35 5 0 S E W E R C H R G - R E S I D E N T I A L $ 3 , 5 8 6 , 9 6 0 $ 3 , 6 3 2 , 2 0 4 $ 3 , 8 1 2 , 4 3 2 $ 1 8 0 , 2 2 8 5 . 0 % 35 5 1 S E W E R C H R G - C O M M E R C I A L $ 1 5 4 , 7 5 8 $ 1 5 4 , 7 0 1 $ 1 5 7 , 9 2 0 $ 3 , 2 1 9 2 . 1 % 35 5 2 S E W E R C H R G - C H U R C H / S C H O O L $ 1 3 0 , 3 6 4 $ 1 2 9 , 3 7 8 $ 1 5 8 , 5 5 2 $ 2 9 , 1 7 4 2 2 . 5 % SU B T O T A L S E W E R R E V E N U E S $ 4 , 4 0 8 , 3 9 3 $ 4 , 5 7 0 , 2 6 1 $ 4 , 8 0 4 , 7 4 5 $ 2 3 4 , 4 8 4 $ 0 38 5 0 A U C T I O N / S A L E O F E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 39 0 0 I N T E R E S T E A R N I N G S $ 6 1 7 $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 39 0 3 S T O R M F E E - C O M M E R C I A L $ 1 8 , 9 7 9 $ 1 8 , 5 0 0 $ 1 8 , 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 9 4 S T O R M F E E - R E S I D E N T I A L $ 4 1 1 , 4 0 6 $ 4 1 6 , 0 0 0 $ 4 1 6 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 39 0 5 S T O R M F E E - S M U $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 39 0 6 S T O R M F E E - C H U R C H / S C H O O L $ 1 0 , 7 1 9 $ 1 0 , 2 0 0 $ 1 0 , 2 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % SU B T O T A L S T O R M W A T E R R E V E N U E $ 4 4 1 , 7 2 1 $ 4 7 1 , 7 0 0 $ 4 7 1 , 7 0 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 39 9 9 O T H E R R E V E N U E $ 5 , 5 0 3 $ 3 , 6 0 0 $ 3 , 6 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % SU B T O T A L O T H E R R E V E N U E $ 5 , 5 0 3 $ 3 , 6 0 0 $ 3 , 6 0 0 $ 0 0 TO T A L R E V E N U E S - W A T E R & S E W E R F U N D $ 1 2 , 1 2 1 , 3 4 2 $ 1 3 , 2 6 9 , 0 8 9 $ 1 3 , 4 4 5 , 0 0 4 $ 1 7 5 , 9 1 5 1 . 3 % 02 - 1 1 R E V E N U E S U F PAGE 35 OF 49Page 155 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 02 - 2 1 U T I L I T Y O F F I C E LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 10 0 1 R E G U L A R E A R N I N G S $ 2 4 9 , 1 9 0 $ 2 5 2 , 3 4 2 $ 2 4 5 , 0 7 2 - $ 7 , 2 7 0 - 2 . 9 % 10 0 2 O V E R T I M E E A R N I N G S $ 1 , 2 8 1 $ 3 , 5 1 8 $ 7 1 6 - $ 2 , 8 0 2 - 7 9 . 6 % 10 0 5 L O N G E V I T Y P A Y $ 2 , 5 7 6 $ 2 , 7 5 2 $ 2 , 9 9 0 $ 2 3 8 8 . 6 % 10 0 7 C A R A L L O W A N C E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 1 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E F . I . C . A . $ 1 8 , 1 6 1 $ 1 9 , 7 8 4 $ 1 9 , 0 3 2 - $ 7 5 2 - 3 . 8 % 11 2 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E T . M . R . S . $ 3 4 , 6 8 9 $ 3 4 , 4 0 0 $ 2 6 , 1 2 2 - $ 8 , 2 7 8 - 2 4 . 1 % 11 3 0 I N S U R A N C E - E M P L O Y E E L I F E $ 1 , 5 7 3 $ 1 , 7 2 6 $ 1 , 6 8 0 - $ 4 6 - 2 . 7 % 11 3 1 I N S U R A N C E - W O R K M E N S C O M P $ 3 2 0 $ 3 3 2 $ 3 2 4 - $ 8 - 2 . 4 % 11 3 2 I N S U R A N C E - U N E M P L O Y M E N T $ 3 2 2 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 3 5 H E A L T H I N S U R A N C E $ 5 4 , 3 4 5 $ 4 5 , 0 0 0 $ 4 5 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % SA L A R I E S & B E N E F I T S $ 3 6 2 , 4 5 7 $ 3 5 9 , 8 5 4 $ 3 4 0 , 9 3 6 - $ 1 8 , 9 1 8 - 5 . 3 % 20 2 9 C L O T H I N G A L L O W A N C E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 21 0 0 O F F I C E S U P P L I E S $ 1 , 9 6 4 $ 7 , 8 7 6 $ 7 , 8 7 6 $ 0 0 . 0 % 23 1 8 C O M P U T E R S U P P L I E S $ 0 $ 2 5 0 $ 2 5 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 23 2 0 G A S , O I L & G R E A S E $ 6 6 9 $ 8 3 6 $ 7 9 3 - $ 4 3 - 5 . 1 % SU P P L I E S $ 2 , 6 3 3 $ 8 , 9 6 2 $ 8 , 9 1 9 - $ 4 3 - 0 . 5 % 30 0 9 C O L L E C T I O N S E R V I C E S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 30 1 0 P O S T A G E $ 2 1 , 7 5 3 $ 6 8 , 6 9 1 $ 6 8 , 6 9 1 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 6 0 P R O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 2 9 , 2 4 5 $ 3 6 , 4 0 0 $ 4 1 , 9 0 0 $ 5 , 5 0 0 1 5 . 1 % 30 6 3 P R O G R A M M I N G / M A I N T E N A N C E $ 1 7 , 4 2 1 $ 2 2 , 2 6 1 $ 1 7 , 7 9 1 - $ 4 , 4 7 0 - 2 0 . 1 % 31 1 3 P R I N T I N G $ 9 8 8 $ 7 , 1 0 5 $ 7 , 1 0 5 $ 0 0 . 0 % PR O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 6 9 , 4 0 7 $ 1 3 4 , 4 5 7 $ 1 3 5 , 4 8 7 $ 1 , 0 3 0 0 . 8 % 41 1 0 H E A T , L I G H T , W A T E R U T I L $ 3 , 1 2 6 $ 6 3 , 3 5 9 $ 7 2 , 8 1 4 $ 9 , 4 5 5 1 4 . 9 % 41 2 0 T E L E P H O N E S E R V I C E $ 2 , 1 1 5 $ 2 , 2 1 8 $ 2 , 7 8 2 $ 5 6 4 2 5 . 4 % 42 7 0 S E W E R P A Y M E N T S $ 2 , 5 0 9 , 7 9 7 $ 2 , 0 9 3 , 2 1 6 $ 2 , 4 0 5 , 6 9 7 $ 3 1 2 , 4 8 1 1 4 . 9 % 42 8 0 W A T E R P U R C H A S E S $ 3 , 4 3 4 , 7 0 9 $ 4 , 4 8 6 , 8 7 6 $ 4 , 3 3 1 , 6 4 2 - $ 1 5 5 , 2 3 4 - 3 . 5 % UT I L I T I E S $ 5 , 9 4 9 , 7 4 7 $ 6 , 6 4 5 , 6 6 9 $ 6 , 8 1 2 , 9 3 5 $ 1 6 7 , 2 6 6 2 . 5 % 55 0 0 I N S U R A N C E - A U T O L I A B I L I T Y $ 1 0 8 $ 1 0 8 $ 1 0 0 - $ 8 - 7 . 4 % 02 - 2 1 U T I L I T Y O F F I C E PAGE 36 OF 49Page 156 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 02 - 2 1 U T I L I T Y O F F I C E LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 55 0 6 I N S U R A N C E - G E N E R A L L I A B I L I T Y $ 8 , 0 2 2 $ 8 , 0 2 2 $ 2 , 8 8 9 - $ 5 , 1 3 3 - 6 4 . 0 % IN S U R A N C E $ 8 , 1 3 0 $ 8 , 1 3 0 $ 2 , 9 8 9 - $ 5 , 1 4 1 - 6 3 . 2 % 61 9 0 A U T O R E P A I R S $ 0 $ 1 4 $ 1 4 $ 0 0 . 0 % 61 9 5 E Q U I P M E N T M A I N T E N A N C E $ 1 , 2 6 5 $ 1 , 2 6 5 $ 1 , 2 6 7 $ 2 0 . 2 % 62 0 0 E Q U I P R E P A I R S / N O N V E H I C L E $ 1 5 , 2 1 3 $ 1 1 , 0 5 0 $ 1 1 , 0 5 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % OU T S I D E S E R V I C E S $ 1 6 , 4 7 8 $ 1 2 , 3 2 9 $ 1 2 , 3 3 1 $ 2 0 . 0 % 71 5 0 D U E S & S U B S C R I P T I O N S $ 0 $ 7 0 0 $ 7 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 71 7 0 T R A V E L E X P E N S E $ 1 , 4 9 8 $ 5 , 4 6 0 $ 5 , 4 6 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 72 0 1 C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T B E L O W $ 5 0 $0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 $ 5 0 0 - $ 2 , 5 0 0 - 8 3 . 3 % 72 0 2 M I C R O C O M P U T E R S O F T W A R E $ 1 , 1 7 7 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 72 2 1 O T H E R E X P E N S E $ 2 5 7 $ 2 , 0 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 72 4 0 T U I T I O N & T R A I N I N G $ 2 , 8 3 5 $ 2 , 5 0 0 $ 2 , 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 74 7 5 I M P R O V E M E N T S - - U N D E R $ 5 0 0 0 $ 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % OT H E R $ 5 , 7 6 7 $ 1 8 , 6 6 0 $ 1 6 , 1 6 0 - $ 2 , 5 0 0 - 1 3 . 4 % 80 1 0 C O N T R I B U T I O N T O G E N . F U N D $ 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 5 5 0 , 0 0 0 $ 5 5 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % TR A N S F E R S $ 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 5 5 0 , 0 0 0 $ 5 5 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 90 0 0 C A P I T A L E Q U I P M E N T R E P L A C E $ 1 , 9 3 4 $ 1 , 5 4 7 $ 1 , 7 4 0 $ 1 9 3 1 2 . 5 % 91 0 0 O F F I C E E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 5 0 0 $ 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 92 0 1 M I C R O C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 92 0 2 M I D R A N G E C O M P U T E R P R O G R . $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 99 1 0 O F F I C E F U R N I T U R E $ 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 99 8 5 C A P I T A L I Z E D E X P E N D I T U R E S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! CA P I T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S $ 1 , 9 3 4 $ 3 , 0 4 7 $ 3 , 2 4 0 $ 1 9 3 6 . 3 % TO T A L U T I L I T Y O F F I C E $ 7 , 0 1 6 , 5 5 3 $ 7 , 7 4 1 , 1 0 8 $ 7 , 8 8 2 , 9 9 7 $ 1 4 1 , 8 8 9 1 . 8 % 02 - 2 1 U T I L I T Y O F F I C E PAGE 37 OF 49Page 157 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 02 - 2 2 U T I L I T I E S LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 10 0 1 R E G U L A R E A R N I N G S $ 1 , 3 3 2 , 1 4 2 $ 1 , 3 8 5 , 7 2 2 $ 1 , 4 6 2 , 7 3 1 $ 7 7 , 0 0 9 5 . 6 % 10 0 2 O V E R T I M E E A R N I N G S $ 4 9 , 0 0 3 $ 8 8 , 4 7 9 $ 4 5 , 5 4 7 - $ 4 2 , 9 3 2 - 4 8 . 5 % 10 0 5 L O N G E V I T Y P A Y $ 1 6 , 2 6 4 $ 1 6 , 7 8 0 $ 1 7 , 5 1 1 $ 7 3 1 4 . 4 % 10 0 7 C A R A L L O W A N C E $ 7 , 2 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 10 0 9 C E L L P H O N E A L L O W A N C E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 1 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E F . I . C . A . $ 1 0 6 , 4 2 6 $ 1 1 3 , 7 1 2 $ 1 1 6 , 4 7 6 $ 2 , 7 6 4 2 . 4 % 11 2 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E T . M . R . S . $ 1 9 9 , 5 7 3 $ 1 9 9 , 1 2 9 $ 1 6 0 , 9 6 4 - $ 3 8 , 1 6 5 - 1 9 . 2 % 11 3 0 I N S U R A N C E - E M P L O Y E E L I F E $ 7 , 8 8 2 $ 9 , 9 4 3 $ 9 , 6 8 7 - $ 2 5 6 - 2 . 6 % 11 3 1 I N S U R A N C E - W O R K M E N S C O M P $ 1 9 , 9 6 1 $ 2 0 , 6 9 2 $ 1 9 , 8 5 0 - $ 8 4 2 - 4 . 1 % 11 3 2 I N S U R A N C E - U N E M P L O Y M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 3 5 H E A L T H I N S U R A N C E $ 2 6 9 , 6 7 2 $ 2 3 4 , 0 0 0 $ 2 3 4 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % SA L A R I E S & B E N E F I T S $ 2 , 0 0 8 , 1 2 3 $ 2 , 0 7 5 , 6 5 8 $ 2 , 0 7 3 , 9 6 6 - $ 1 , 6 9 2 - 0 . 1 % 20 2 9 C L O T H I N G A L L O W A N C E $ 1 9 , 8 2 7 $ 1 3 , 9 5 5 $ 1 3 , 9 5 5 $ 0 0 . 0 % 21 0 0 O F F I C E S U P P L I E S $ 1 , 5 5 1 $ 2 , 5 5 0 $ 2 , 5 5 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 23 1 8 C O M P U T E R S U P P L I E S $ 0 $ 5 0 0 $ 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 23 2 0 G A S , O I L & G R E A S E $ 5 8 , 2 7 3 $ 7 2 , 6 0 1 $ 8 1 , 1 6 6 $ 8 , 5 6 5 1 1 . 8 % 23 5 0 S U P P L I E S & M A T E R I A L S $ 4 0 , 1 9 9 $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 8 2 , 5 0 0 - $ 1 7 , 5 0 0 - 1 7 . 5 % 23 7 0 B A C K F I L L M A T E R I A L S $ 1 4 3 , 8 4 3 $ 1 4 2 , 8 3 0 $ 1 4 5 , 0 0 0 $ 2 , 1 7 0 1 . 5 % SU P P L I E S $ 2 6 3 , 6 9 3 $ 3 3 2 , 4 3 6 $ 3 2 5 , 6 7 1 - $ 6 , 7 6 5 - 2 . 0 % 30 0 3 B O A R D M E E T I N G S $ 7 3 4 $ 4 5 0 $ 4 5 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 1 0 P O S T A G E $ 2 2 0 $ 0 $ 2 0 0 $ 2 0 0 # D I V / 0 ! 30 1 4 P U B L I C A T I O N S $ 4 2 3 $ 2 , 0 9 5 $ 2 , 0 9 5 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 6 0 P R O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 7 2 , 8 8 6 $ 9 9 , 0 0 0 $ 9 9 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 6 3 P R O G R A M M I N G / M A I N T E N A N C E $ 5 7 , 8 9 7 $ 6 0 , 0 2 5 $ 6 0 , 7 2 4 $ 6 9 9 1 . 2 % 31 1 3 P R I N T I N G $ 2 1 0 $ 0 $ 5 0 0 $ 5 0 0 # D I V / 0 ! 31 1 5 C O N T R A C T M A I N T E N A N C E $ 7 , 7 1 9 $ 6 , 3 7 0 $ 4 , 6 0 7 - $ 1 , 7 6 3 - 2 7 . 7 % PR O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 1 4 0 , 0 8 9 $ 1 6 7 , 9 4 0 $ 1 6 7 , 5 7 6 - $ 3 6 4 - 0 . 2 % 41 1 0 H E A T , L I G H T , W A T E R U T I L $ 1 0 , 1 1 2 $ 1 0 , 5 9 5 $ 1 1 , 6 8 6 $ 1 , 0 9 1 1 0 . 3 % 41 2 0 T E L E P H O N E S E R V I C E $ 6 , 6 2 2 $ 4 , 6 7 1 $ 4 , 0 4 7 - $ 6 2 4 - 1 3 . 4 % UT I L I T I E S $ 1 6 , 7 3 4 $ 1 5 , 2 6 6 $ 1 5 , 7 3 3 $ 4 6 7 3 . 1 % 02 - 2 2 U T I L I T I E S PAGE 38 OF 49Page 158 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 02 - 2 2 U T I L I T I E S LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 55 0 0 I N S U R A N C E - A U T O L I A B I L I T Y $ 1 9 , 5 0 1 $ 1 9 , 5 0 1 $ 1 8 , 0 0 1 - $ 1 , 5 0 0 - 7 . 7 % 55 0 6 I N S U R A N C E - G E N E R A L L I A B I L I T Y $ 4 , 0 8 5 $ 4 , 0 8 5 $ 1 , 4 7 1 - $ 2 , 6 1 4 - 6 4 . 0 % IN S U R A N C E $ 2 3 , 5 8 6 $ 2 3 , 5 8 6 $ 1 9 , 4 7 2 - $ 4 , 1 1 4 - 1 7 . 4 % 61 9 0 A U T O R E P A I R S $ 4 6 , 0 3 5 $ 4 0 , 3 6 7 $ 4 0 , 3 6 7 $ 0 0 . 0 % 61 9 5 E Q U I P M E N T M A I N T E N A N C E $ 2 2 9 , 7 8 9 $ 2 2 9 , 7 8 9 $ 2 2 6 , 3 5 7 - $ 3 , 4 3 2 - 1 . 5 % 62 0 0 E Q U I P R E P A I R S / N O N V E H I C L E $ 2 , 8 7 6 $ 1 , 7 5 0 $ 1 , 7 5 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 63 5 5 U T I L I T Y M A I N M A I N T E N A N C E $ 2 5 4 , 6 3 4 $ 2 3 5 , 0 0 0 $ 2 3 5 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 63 6 5 F I R E H Y D R A N T / L I N E I N S T A L L $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! OU T S I D E S E R V I C E S $ 5 3 3 , 3 3 4 $ 5 0 6 , 9 0 6 $ 5 0 3 , 4 7 4 - $ 3 , 4 3 2 - 0 . 7 % 71 5 0 D U E S & S U B S C R I P T I O N S $ 1 , 2 4 9 $ 2 , 3 6 6 $ 2 , 4 9 6 $ 1 3 0 5 . 5 % 71 7 0 T R A V E L E X P E N S E $ 2 , 4 2 7 $ 1 3 , 2 6 5 $ 1 3 , 2 6 5 $ 0 0 . 0 % 72 0 1 C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T B E L O W $ 5 0 $2 , 8 2 8 $ 5 0 0 $ 4 , 7 1 5 $ 4 , 2 1 5 8 4 3 . 0 % 72 0 2 M I C R O C O M P U T E R S O F T W A R E $ 7 0 6 $ 0 $ 1 2 , 5 0 0 $ 1 2 , 5 0 0 # D I V / 0 ! 72 2 1 O T H E R E X P E N S E $ 3 , 6 8 1 $ 2 , 9 0 0 $ 2 , 9 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 72 4 0 T U I T I O N & T R A I N I N G $ 4 , 2 2 6 $ 8 , 1 4 5 $ 8 , 2 1 5 $ 7 0 0 . 9 % 72 6 0 E Q U I P M E N T R E N T A L $ 3 8 3 $ 3 , 0 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 73 3 1 P O W E R T O O L S $ 1 , 2 5 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 74 7 5 I M P R O V E M E N T S - - U N D E R $ 5 0 0 0 $ 2 , 2 7 7 $ 2 , 5 0 0 $ 2 , 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 75 0 0 D E P R E C I A T I O N E X P E N S E $ 1 0 1 , 9 6 5 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! OT H E R $ 1 2 0 , 9 9 2 $ 3 7 , 6 7 6 $ 5 4 , 5 9 1 $ 1 6 , 9 1 5 4 4 . 9 % 90 0 0 C A P I T A L E Q U I P M E N T R E P L A C E $ 7 6 , 8 4 2 $ 8 6 , 0 3 4 $ 9 6 , 8 2 3 $ 1 0 , 7 8 9 1 2 . 5 % 91 0 0 O F F I C E E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 91 1 0 R A D I O E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 91 1 5 S M A L L E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 92 0 1 M I C R O C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 9 , 0 0 0 $ 9 , 0 0 0 # D I V / 0 ! 92 0 5 C A M E R A E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! CA P I T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S $ 7 6 , 8 4 2 $ 8 6 , 0 3 4 $ 1 0 5 , 8 2 3 $ 1 9 , 7 8 9 2 3 . 0 % TO T A L U T I L I T I E S $ 3 , 1 8 3 , 3 9 3 $ 3 , 2 4 5 , 5 0 2 $ 3 , 2 6 6 , 3 0 6 $ 2 0 , 8 0 4 0 . 6 % 02 - 2 2 U T I L I T I E S PAGE 39 OF 49Page 159 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 02 - 2 3 S T O R M W A T E R LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 10 0 1 R E G U L A R E A R N I N G S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 10 0 2 O V E R T I M E E A R N I N G S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 10 0 5 L O N G E V I T Y P A Y $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 10 0 7 C A R A L L O W A N C E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 1 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E F . I . C . A . $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 2 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E T . M . R . S . $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 3 0 I N S U R A N C E - E M P L O Y E E L I F E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 3 1 I N S U R A N C E - W O R K M E N S C O M P $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 3 2 I N S U R A N C E - U N E M P L O Y M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 3 5 H E A L T H I N S U R A N C E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! SA L A R I E S & B E N E F I T S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 20 2 9 C L O T H I N G A L L O W A N C E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 21 0 0 O F F I C E S U P P L I E S $ 8 4 $ 1 , 5 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 23 2 0 G A S , O I L & G R E A S E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 23 5 0 S U P P L I E S & M A T E R I A L S $ 3 , 6 8 0 $ 7 , 5 0 0 $ 8 , 5 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 1 3 . 3 % 23 7 0 B A C K F I L L M A T E R I A L S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! SU P P L I E S $ 3 , 7 6 4 $ 9 , 0 0 0 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 1 1 . 1 % 30 1 0 P O S T A G E $ 9 9 1 $ 1 , 1 5 0 $ 1 , 1 5 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 6 0 P R O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 0 $ 6 2 , 0 0 0 $ 6 5 , 0 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 4 . 8 % 31 1 3 P R I N T I N G $ 0 $ 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 # D I V / 0 ! PR O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 9 9 1 $ 6 3 , 1 5 0 $ 6 8 , 1 5 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 7 . 9 % 55 0 0 I N S U R A N C E - A U T O L I A B I L I T Y $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 55 0 6 I N S U R A N C E - G E N E R A L L I A B I L I T Y $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! IN S U R A N C E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 62 0 0 E Q U I P R E P A I R S / N O N V E H I C L E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! OU T S I D E S E R V I C E S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 71 5 0 D U E S & S U B S C R I P T I O N S $ 1 0 0 $ 7 , 1 0 0 $ 7 , 1 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 02 - 2 3 S T O R M W A T E R PAGE 40 OF 49Page 160 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 02 - 2 3 S T O R M W A T E R LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 71 7 0 T R A V E L E X P E N S E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 72 2 1 O T H E R E X P E N S E $ 2 , 9 0 1 $ 2 , 2 0 0 $ 2 0 0 - $ 2 , 0 0 0 - 9 0 . 9 % 72 4 0 T U I T I O N & T R A I N I N G $ 7 0 $ 5 , 5 0 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 - $ 5 0 0 - 9 . 1 % 72 6 0 E Q U I P M E N T R E N T A L $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! OT H E R $ 3 , 0 7 1 $ 1 4 , 8 0 0 $ 1 2 , 3 0 0 - $ 2 , 5 0 0 - 1 6 . 9 % 91 0 0 O F F I C E E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 92 0 1 M I C R O C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T $ 4 6 , 6 0 7 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! CA P I T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S $ 4 6 , 6 0 7 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! TO T A L S T O R M W A T E R $ 5 4 , 4 3 3 $ 8 6 , 9 5 0 $ 9 0 , 4 5 0 $ 3 , 5 0 0 4 . 0 % 02 - 2 3 S T O R M W A T E R PAGE 41 OF 49Page 161 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 02 - 8 5 T R A N S F E R S U F LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 63 6 5 F I R E H Y D R A N T / L I N E I N S T A L L $ 1 7 5 , 8 9 6 $ 1 7 5 , 8 9 3 $ 1 7 5 , 8 9 3 $ 0 0 . 0 % OU T S I D E S E R V I C E S $ 1 7 5 , 8 9 6 $ 1 7 5 , 8 9 3 $ 1 7 5 , 8 9 3 $ 0 0 . 0 % 85 0 0 T R A N S F E R S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! TR A N S F E R S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 98 0 1 L I N E R E P L A C E M E N T P R O J E C T $ 2 , 0 1 9 , 5 2 8 $ 2 , 0 1 9 , 5 2 2 $ 2 , 0 1 9 , 5 2 2 $ 0 0 . 0 % 99 9 0 I N F R A S T R U C T U R E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! CA P I T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S $ 2 , 0 1 9 , 5 2 8 $ 2 , 0 1 9 , 5 2 2 $ 2 , 0 1 9 , 5 2 2 $ 0 0 . 0 % TO T A L T R A N S F E R S $ 2 , 1 9 5 , 4 2 4 $ 2 , 1 9 5 , 4 1 5 $ 2 , 1 9 5 , 4 1 5 $ 0 0 . 0 % 02 - 8 5 T R A N S F E R S U F PAGE 42 OF 49Page 162 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 04 - 1 1 R E V E N U E S S F LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 35 0 1 R E F U S E C O L L - S M U $ 6 9 , 7 4 2 $ 1 6 1 , 1 2 3 $ 1 6 1 , 1 2 3 $ 0 0 . 0 % 35 4 0 R E F U S E C O L L - R E S I D E N T I A L $ 1 , 8 9 1 , 8 6 6 $ 1 , 9 0 3 , 4 4 0 $ 1 , 9 0 3 , 4 4 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 35 4 1 R E F U S E C O L L - C O M M E R C I A L $ 2 8 9 , 3 2 1 $ 3 2 9 , 1 7 5 $ 3 2 9 , 1 7 5 $ 0 0 . 0 % 35 4 2 R E F U S E C O L L - C H U R C H / S C H O O L $ 1 5 9 , 1 3 1 $ 1 9 0 , 5 7 5 $ 1 9 0 , 5 7 5 $ 0 0 . 0 % SU B T O T A L R E F U S E C O L L E C T I O N $ 2 , 4 1 0 , 0 6 0 $ 2 , 5 8 4 , 3 1 3 $ 2 , 5 8 4 , 3 1 3 $ 0 0 . 0 % 35 0 4 R E C Y C L I N G R E V E N U E $ 3 2 5 , 9 7 0 $ 2 9 1 , 0 6 0 $ 2 9 1 , 0 6 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % SU B T O T A L R E C Y C L I N G R E V E N U E $ 3 2 5 , 9 7 0 $ 2 9 1 , 0 6 0 $ 2 9 1 , 0 6 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 35 0 3 Y A R D W A S T E B A G S R E V E N U E $ 6 3 , 9 7 4 $ 8 4 , 7 0 0 $ 8 4 , 7 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 35 4 3 B R U S H / S P E C I A L P I C K U P C H R G $ 6 6 , 6 4 7 $ 8 2 , 5 0 0 $ 8 2 , 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 38 5 0 A U C T I O N / S A L E O F E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 39 0 0 I N T E R E S T E A R N I N G S $ 7 2 8 $ 3 , 0 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 39 9 9 O T H E R R E V E N U E $ 8 8 5 $ 2 4 , 8 7 8 $ 2 4 , 8 7 8 $ 0 0 . 0 % SU B T O T A L O T H E R R E V E N U E $ 1 3 2 , 2 3 4 $ 1 9 5 , 0 7 8 $ 1 9 5 , 0 7 8 $ 0 0 . 0 % TO T A L R E V E N U E S - S A N I T A T I O N F U N D $ 2 , 8 6 8 , 2 6 4 $ 3 , 0 7 0 , 4 5 1 $ 3 , 0 7 0 , 4 5 1 $ 0 0 . 0 % 04 - 1 1 R E V E N U E S S F PAGE 43 OF 49Page 163 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 04 - 6 0 S A N I T A T I O N LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 10 0 1 R E G U L A R E A R N I N G S $ 1 , 1 6 8 , 7 1 3 $ 1 , 2 1 9 , 9 9 6 $ 1 , 2 2 7 , 4 3 8 $ 7 , 4 4 2 0 . 6 % 10 0 2 O V E R T I M E E A R N I N G S $ 5 5 , 2 2 9 $ 3 9 , 4 0 5 $ 3 8 , 7 0 6 - $ 6 9 9 - 1 . 8 % 10 0 5 L O N G E V I T Y P A Y $ 1 7 , 6 1 5 $ 1 8 , 6 9 2 $ 1 8 , 4 8 8 - $ 2 0 4 - 1 . 1 % 10 0 7 C A R A L L O W A N C E $ 7 , 2 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 11 1 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E F . I . C . A . $ 9 4 , 2 3 4 $ 9 7 , 7 7 4 $ 9 8 , 8 2 5 $ 1 , 0 5 1 1 . 1 % 11 2 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E T . M . R . S . $ 1 7 5 , 7 0 0 $ 1 7 0 , 8 9 8 $ 1 3 5 , 6 4 1 - $ 3 5 , 2 5 7 - 2 0 . 6 % 11 3 0 I N S U R A N C E - E M P L O Y E E L I F E $ 8 , 6 4 1 $ 8 , 4 8 4 $ 8 , 1 2 7 - $ 3 5 7 - 4 . 2 % 11 3 1 I N S U R A N C E - W O R K M E N S C O M P $ 3 0 , 5 3 0 $ 3 2 , 6 5 3 $ 4 0 , 5 1 0 $ 7 , 8 5 7 2 4 . 1 % 11 3 2 I N S U R A N C E - U N E M P L O Y M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 3 5 H E A L T H I N S U R A N C E $ 2 8 6 , 1 8 2 $ 2 4 3 , 0 0 0 $ 2 4 3 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % SA L A R I E S & B E N E F I T S $ 1 , 8 4 4 , 0 4 4 $ 1 , 8 3 8 , 1 0 2 $ 1 , 8 1 7 , 9 3 5 - $ 2 0 , 1 6 7 - 1 . 1 % 20 2 9 C L O T H I N G A L L O W A N C E $ 1 4 , 1 2 2 $ 1 2 , 9 6 6 $ 1 3 , 2 3 2 $ 2 6 6 2 . 1 % 21 0 0 O F F I C E S U P P L I E S $ 2 , 4 4 3 $ 2 , 3 2 3 $ 3 , 0 6 6 $ 7 4 3 3 2 . 0 % 23 1 8 C O M P U T E R S U P P L I E S $ 4 6 8 $ 5 0 0 $ 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 23 2 0 G A S , O I L & G R E A S E $ 1 0 0 , 4 2 5 $ 1 4 4 , 4 4 5 $ 1 3 2 , 9 2 5 - $ 1 1 , 5 2 0 - 8 . 0 % 23 5 0 S U P P L I E S & M A T E R I A L S $ 1 5 , 3 8 5 $ 1 7 , 9 3 4 $ 1 8 , 1 8 2 $ 2 4 8 1 . 4 % 23 6 0 S M A L L T O O L S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! SU P P L I E S $ 1 3 2 , 8 4 3 $ 1 7 8 , 1 6 8 $ 1 6 7 , 9 0 5 - $ 1 0 , 2 6 3 - 5 . 8 % 30 1 0 P O S T A G E $ 2 , 7 4 2 $ 4 , 1 0 4 $ 4 , 1 0 4 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 1 4 P U B L I C A T I O N S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 30 6 0 P R O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 2 , 5 3 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 30 6 3 P R O G R A M M I N G / M A I N T E N A N C E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 31 1 3 P R I N T I N G $ 3 , 3 9 3 $ 2 , 7 9 0 $ 1 , 7 9 0 - $ 1 , 0 0 0 - 3 5 . 8 % 31 1 5 C O N T R A C T M A I N T E N A N C E $ 5 , 2 1 7 $ 5 , 1 3 7 $ 3 , 7 1 6 - $ 1 , 4 2 1 - 2 7 . 7 % PR O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 1 3 , 8 8 2 $ 1 2 , 0 3 1 $ 9 , 6 1 0 - $ 2 , 4 2 1 - 2 0 . 1 % 41 1 0 H E A T , L I G H T , W A T E R U T I L $ 1 0 , 6 2 5 $ 1 1 , 7 5 9 $ 1 1 , 3 3 6 - $ 4 2 3 - 3 . 6 % 41 2 0 T E L E P H O N E S E R V I C E $ 5 , 3 5 7 $ 4 , 4 7 4 $ 4 , 4 7 4 $ 0 0 . 0 % 43 9 0 L A N D F I L L $ 1 0 7 , 1 6 7 $ 1 4 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 4 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 43 9 2 D I S P O S A L F E E S C O N T I N G E N C Y $ 0 $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 43 9 5 T R A N S F E R C L O S U R E C O S T S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! UT I L I T I E S $ 1 2 3 , 1 4 9 $ 2 5 6 , 2 3 3 $ 2 5 5 , 8 1 0 - $ 4 2 3 - 0 . 2 % 55 0 0 I N S U R A N C E - A U T O L I A B I L I T Y $ 1 3 , 7 2 3 $ 1 3 , 7 2 3 $ 1 2 , 6 6 8 - $ 1 , 0 5 5 - 7 . 7 % 04 - 6 0 S A N I T A T I O N PAGE 44 OF 49Page 164 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 04 - 6 0 S A N I T A T I O N LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 55 0 6 I N S U R A N C E - G E N E R A L L I A B I L I T Y $ 3 , 4 1 3 $ 3 , 4 1 3 $ 1 , 2 2 9 - $ 2 , 1 8 4 - 6 4 . 0 % IN S U R A N C E $ 1 7 , 1 3 6 $ 1 7 , 1 3 6 $ 1 3 , 8 9 7 - $ 3 , 2 3 9 - 1 8 . 9 % 61 8 6 T R A N S F E R S T A T I O N R E P A I R $ 3 , 2 6 1 $ 1 1 , 6 0 0 $ 1 4 , 6 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 2 5 . 9 % 61 9 0 A U T O R E P A I R S $ 7 0 , 4 1 6 $ 1 5 5 , 8 5 4 $ 1 5 5 , 8 5 4 $ 0 0 . 0 % 61 9 5 E Q U I P M E N T M A I N T E N A N C E $ 2 2 3 , 9 7 0 $ 2 2 3 , 9 6 9 $ 2 0 0 , 4 4 9 - $ 2 3 , 5 2 0 - 1 0 . 5 % 62 0 0 E Q U I P R E P A I R S / N O N V E H I C L E $ 2 , 3 9 3 $ 1 , 6 2 5 $ 1 , 6 2 5 $ 0 0 . 0 % 63 1 8 C O N T A I N E R M A I N T E N A N C E $ 4 2 1 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 64 0 0 R E C Y C L I N G F E E S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! OU T S I D E S E R V I C E S $ 3 0 0 , 4 6 1 $ 3 9 4 , 0 4 8 $ 3 7 3 , 5 2 8 - $ 2 0 , 5 2 0 - 5 . 2 % 71 5 0 D U E S & S U B S C R I P T I O N S $ 7 6 9 $ 1 , 2 7 5 $ 1 , 0 7 5 - $ 2 0 0 - 1 5 . 7 % 71 7 0 T R A V E L E X P E N S E $ 6 5 7 $ 5 3 5 $ 4 0 0 - $ 1 3 5 - 2 5 . 2 % 72 0 1 C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T B E L O W $ 5 0 $1 , 0 1 1 $ 1 , 9 0 0 $ 1 , 9 6 5 $ 6 5 3 . 4 % 72 0 2 M I C R O C O M P U T E R S O F T W A R E $ 7 8 5 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 72 2 1 O T H E R E X P E N S E $ 2 , 5 4 2 $ 5 , 2 6 5 $ 6 , 4 6 5 $ 1 , 2 0 0 2 2 . 8 % 72 4 0 T U I T I O N & T R A I N I N G $ 1 , 5 5 7 $ 1 , 6 1 5 $ 1 , 3 6 5 - $ 2 5 0 - 1 5 . 5 % 73 5 0 Y A R D W A S T E P R O G R A M $ 2 5 , 5 4 0 $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 73 9 2 C O N T A I N E R S $ 9 , 9 7 4 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 74 7 5 I M P R O V E M E N T S - - U N D E R $ 5 0 0 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 75 0 0 D E P R E C I A T I O N E X P E N S E $ 9 , 4 4 6 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 76 0 1 H A Z A R D O U S W A S T E S E R V I C E $ 2 6 , 6 4 6 $ 2 9 , 3 8 0 $ 3 1 , 4 8 0 $ 2 , 1 0 0 7 . 1 % OT H E R $ 7 8 , 9 2 7 $ 7 4 , 9 7 0 $ 7 7 , 7 5 0 $ 2 , 7 8 0 3 . 7 % 90 0 0 C A P I T A L E Q U I P M E N T R E P L A C E $ 1 6 2 , 5 3 7 $ 1 4 4 , 7 1 5 $ 1 5 1 , 5 4 1 $ 6 , 8 2 6 4 . 7 % 91 0 0 O F F I C E E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 91 1 0 R A D I O E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 91 1 5 S M A L L E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 91 2 0 C O M P A C T O R R E P L A C E M E N T S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 92 0 1 M I C R O C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 97 2 0 H E A V Y D U T Y T R U C K S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 99 1 0 O F F I C E F U R N I T U R E $ 0 $ 5 0 0 $ 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 99 8 5 C A P I T A L I Z E D E X P E N D I T U R E S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! CA P I T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S $ 1 6 2 , 5 3 7 $ 1 4 5 , 2 1 5 $ 1 5 2 , 0 4 1 $ 6 , 8 2 6 4 . 7 % TO T A L S A N I T A T I O N $ 2 , 6 7 2 , 9 7 9 $ 2 , 9 1 5 , 9 0 3 $ 2 , 8 6 8 , 4 7 6 - $ 4 7 , 4 2 7 - 1 . 6 % 04 - 6 0 S A N I T A T I O N PAGE 45 OF 49Page 165 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 47 - 3 0 G A R A G E LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 10 0 1 R E G U L A R E A R N I N G S $ 4 2 0 , 0 0 1 $ 4 3 9 , 9 4 6 $ 4 4 5 , 9 9 0 $ 6 , 0 4 4 1 . 4 % 10 0 2 O V E R T I M E E A R N I N G S $ 7 0 0 $ 3 , 4 7 9 $ 0 - $ 3 , 4 7 9 - 1 0 0 . 0 % 10 0 4 M I S C E L L A N E O U S A L L O W A N C E S $ 1 , 6 3 9 $ 1 , 6 0 0 $ 1 , 6 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 10 0 5 L O N G E V I T Y P A Y $ 4 , 4 7 6 $ 4 , 1 2 0 $ 4 , 3 3 4 $ 2 1 4 5 . 2 % 10 0 7 C A R A L L O W A N C E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 1 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E F . I . C . A . $ 3 2 , 5 0 5 $ 3 4 , 2 3 7 $ 3 4 , 5 7 2 $ 3 3 5 1 . 0 % 11 2 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E T . M . R . S . $ 6 1 , 1 2 2 $ 5 9 , 7 4 8 $ 4 7 , 4 5 2 - $ 1 2 , 2 9 6 - 2 0 . 6 % 11 2 7 R E T I R E M E N T S U P P L E M E N T A L $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 3 0 I N S U R A N C E - E M P L O Y E E L I F E $ 2 , 7 2 4 $ 2 , 9 8 4 $ 2 , 9 5 5 - $ 2 9 - 1 . 0 % 11 3 1 I N S U R A N C E - W O R K M E N S C O M P $ 5 , 2 6 6 $ 5 , 3 9 6 $ 5 , 6 4 9 $ 2 5 3 4 . 7 % 11 3 2 I N S U R A N C E - U N E M P L O Y M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 3 5 H E A L T H I N S U R A N C E $ 7 7 , 0 4 9 $ 6 3 , 0 0 0 $ 6 3 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % SA L A R I E S & B E N E F I T S $ 6 0 5 , 4 8 2 $ 6 1 4 , 5 1 0 $ 6 0 5 , 5 5 2 - $ 8 , 9 5 8 - 1 . 5 % 20 2 9 C L O T H I N G A L L O W A N C E $ 2 , 6 9 1 $ 2 , 8 9 6 $ 2 , 8 9 6 $ 0 0 . 0 % 21 0 0 O F F I C E S U P P L I E S $ 3 3 5 $ 5 1 5 $ 5 1 5 $ 0 0 . 0 % 23 1 8 C O M P U T E R S U P P L I E S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 23 2 0 G A S , O I L & G R E A S E $ 7 6 7 $ 1 , 0 8 3 $ 9 1 3 - $ 1 7 0 - 1 5 . 7 % 23 5 0 S U P P L I E S & M A T E R I A L S $ 1 2 , 7 7 9 $ 1 8 , 9 5 0 $ 1 8 , 9 5 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % SU P P L I E S $ 1 6 , 5 7 2 $ 2 3 , 4 4 4 $ 2 4 , 1 8 7 $ 7 4 3 3 . 2 % 30 1 0 P O S T A G E $ 6 9 $ 2 6 $ 2 6 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 6 0 P R O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 6 3 P R O G R A M M I N G / M A I N T E N A N C E $ 1 0 , 4 6 4 $ 1 4 , 5 2 7 $ 1 4 , 1 6 2 - $ 3 6 5 - 2 . 5 % 31 1 3 P R I N T I N G $ 0 $ 2 4 0 $ 2 4 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % PR O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 1 0 , 5 3 3 $ 1 6 , 7 9 3 $ 1 6 , 4 2 8 - $ 3 6 5 - 2 . 2 % 41 1 0 H E A T , L I G H T , W A T E R U T I L $ 2 9 , 0 2 1 $ 3 0 , 9 8 3 $ 3 2 , 6 6 0 $ 1 , 6 7 7 5 . 4 % 41 2 0 T E L E P H O N E S E R V I C E $ 2 , 9 1 2 $ 3 , 0 6 4 $ 3 , 0 6 4 $ 0 0 . 0 % UT I L I T I E S $ 3 1 , 9 3 3 $ 3 4 , 0 4 7 $ 3 5 , 7 2 4 $ 1 , 6 7 7 4 . 9 % 55 0 0 I N S U R A N C E - A U T O L I A B I L I T Y $ 2 6 7 $ 2 6 7 $ 2 4 6 - $ 2 1 - 7 . 9 % 47 - 3 0 G A R A G E PAGE 46 OF 49Page 166 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 47 - 3 0 G A R A G E LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 55 0 6 I N S U R A N C E - G E N E R A L L I A B I L I T Y $ 9 6 3 $ 9 6 3 $ 3 4 7 - $ 6 1 6 - 6 4 . 0 % IN S U R A N C E $ 1 , 2 3 0 $ 1 , 2 3 0 $ 5 9 3 - $ 6 3 7 - 5 1 . 8 % 61 9 0 A U T O R E P A I R S $ 6 , 8 8 8 $ 7 , 6 7 3 $ 7 , 6 7 3 $ 0 0 . 0 % 61 9 5 E Q U I P M E N T M A I N T E N A N C E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 62 0 0 E Q U I P R E P A I R S / N O N V E H I C L E $ 4 , 8 3 5 $ 3 , 0 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 63 3 0 R A D I O S E R V I C E $ 6 3 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! OU T S I D E S E R V I C E S $ 1 2 , 3 5 3 $ 1 0 , 6 7 3 $ 1 0 , 6 7 3 $ 0 0 . 0 % 71 5 0 D U E S & S U B S C R I P T I O N S $ 5 2 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 71 5 5 V E H I C L E R E L A T E D E X P E N S E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 71 7 0 T R A V E L E X P E N S E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 72 0 1 C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T B E L O W $ 5 0 $0 $ 9 0 0 $ 3 , 2 3 0 $ 2 , 3 3 0 2 5 8 . 9 % 72 0 2 M I C R O C O M P U T E R S O F T W A R E $ 3 , 8 3 4 $ 5 , 9 0 0 $ 5 , 9 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 72 2 1 O T H E R E X P E N S E $ 1 , 4 5 0 $ 4 8 0 $ 4 8 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 72 4 0 T U I T I O N & T R A I N I N G $ 5 5 5 $ 2 3 5 $ 2 3 5 $ 0 0 . 0 % 72 6 0 E Q U I P M E N T R E N T A L $ 8 1 8 $ 1 , 4 0 0 $ 1 , 4 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 74 7 5 I M P R O V E M E N T S - - U N D E R $ 5 0 0 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 75 0 0 D E P R E C I A T I O N E X P E N S E $ 5 4 3 , 6 0 8 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! OT H E R $ 5 5 0 , 3 1 7 $ 8 , 9 1 5 $ 1 1 , 2 4 5 $ 2 , 3 3 0 2 6 . 1 % 90 0 0 C A P I T A L E Q U I P M E N T R E P L A C E $ 0 $ 3 , 8 6 6 $ 6 , 1 7 4 $ 2 , 3 0 8 5 9 . 7 % 91 0 0 O F F I C E E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 91 1 0 R A D I O E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 92 0 1 M I C R O C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 95 7 5 G A R A G E E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 99 1 0 O F F I C E F U R N I T U R E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 99 8 5 C A P I T A L I Z E D E X P E N D I T U R E S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! CA P I T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S $ 0 $ 3 , 8 6 6 $ 6 , 1 7 4 $ 2 , 3 0 8 5 9 . 7 % TO T A L G A R A G E $ 1 , 2 2 8 , 4 2 0 $ 7 1 3 , 4 7 8 $ 7 1 0 , 5 7 6 - $ 2 , 9 0 2 - 0 . 4 % 47 - 3 0 G A R A G E PAGE 47 OF 49Page 167 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 47 - 3 4 W A R E H O U S E LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 10 0 1 R E G U L A R E A R N I N G S $ 1 5 4 , 9 5 6 $ 1 5 9 , 4 3 2 $ 1 5 9 , 4 0 3 - $ 2 9 0 . 0 % 10 0 2 O V E R T I M E E A R N I N G S $ 0 $ 3 , 9 8 6 $ 1 4 - $ 3 , 9 7 2 - 9 9 . 6 % 10 0 5 L O N G E V I T Y P A Y $ 1 , 5 0 9 $ 1 , 6 5 2 $ 1 , 7 9 5 $ 1 4 3 8 . 7 % 11 1 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E F . I . C . A . $ 1 1 , 5 8 6 $ 1 2 , 6 2 8 $ 1 2 , 3 3 2 - $ 2 9 6 - 2 . 3 % 11 2 0 E M P L O Y E R S S H A R E T . M . R . S . $ 2 1 , 7 6 0 $ 2 1 , 9 5 5 $ 1 6 , 9 2 6 - $ 5 , 0 2 9 - 2 2 . 9 % 11 3 0 I N S U R A N C E - E M P L O Y E E L I F E $ 9 8 5 $ 1 , 1 0 4 $ 1 , 0 5 6 - $ 4 8 - 4 . 3 % 11 3 1 I N S U R A N C E - W O R K M E N S C O M P $ 2 , 2 8 6 $ 2 , 3 8 6 $ 2 , 4 4 8 $ 6 2 2 . 6 % 11 3 2 I N S U R A N C E - U N E M P L O Y M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 3 5 H E A L T H I N S U R A N C E $ 3 3 , 0 2 1 $ 2 7 , 0 0 0 $ 2 7 , 0 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % SA L A R I E S & B E N E F I T S $ 2 2 6 , 1 0 3 $ 2 3 0 , 1 4 2 $ 2 2 0 , 9 7 4 - $ 9 , 1 6 8 - 4 . 0 % 20 2 9 C L O T H I N G A L L O W A N C E $ 2 0 6 $ 6 7 6 $ 6 7 6 $ 0 0 . 0 % 21 0 0 O F F I C E S U P P L I E S $ 4 2 2 $ 2 , 1 7 1 $ 2 , 1 7 1 $ 0 0 . 0 % 23 1 8 C O M P U T E R S U P P L I E S $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 23 2 0 G A S , O I L & G R E A S E $ 1 , 7 1 2 $ 2 , 1 5 4 $ 2 , 3 1 0 $ 1 5 6 7 . 2 % 23 5 0 S U P P L I E S & M A T E R I A L S $ 1 , 1 1 5 $ 1 , 2 7 1 $ 1 , 2 7 1 $ 0 0 . 0 % SU P P L I E S $ 3 , 4 5 5 $ 6 , 2 7 2 $ 6 , 4 2 8 $ 1 5 6 2 . 5 % 30 1 0 P O S T A G E $ 1 3 $ 2 0 0 $ 2 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 30 6 3 P R O G R A M M I N G / M A I N T E N A N C E $ 7 , 9 7 7 $ 7 , 9 8 0 $ 7 , 1 0 0 - $ 8 8 0 - 1 1 . 0 % PR O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S $ 7 , 9 9 0 $ 8 , 1 8 0 $ 7 , 3 0 0 - $ 8 8 0 - 1 0 . 8 % 41 1 0 H E A T , L I G H T , W A T E R U T I L $ 9 , 8 2 9 $ 1 0 , 4 0 6 $ 1 1 , 3 4 4 $ 9 3 8 9 . 0 % 41 2 0 T E L E P H O N E S E R V I C E $ 2 , 3 8 1 $ 2 , 4 8 0 $ 2 , 4 8 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % UT I L I T I E S $ 1 2 , 2 1 0 $ 1 2 , 8 8 6 $ 1 3 , 8 2 4 $ 9 3 8 7 . 3 % 55 0 0 I N S U R A N C E - A U T O L I A B I L I T Y $ 1 3 2 $ 1 3 2 $ 1 2 2 - $ 1 0 - 7 . 6 % 55 0 6 I N S U R A N C E - G E N E R A L L I A B I L I T Y $ 3 2 7 $ 3 2 7 $ 1 1 8 - $ 2 0 9 - 6 3 . 9 % IN S U R A N C E $ 4 5 9 $ 4 5 9 $ 2 4 0 - $ 2 1 9 - 4 7 . 7 % 61 9 0 A U T O R E P A I R S $ 7 0 3 $ 1 , 3 4 1 $ 1 , 3 4 1 $ 0 0 . 0 % 61 9 5 E Q U I P M E N T M A I N T E N A N C E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 47 - 3 4 W A R E H O U S E PAGE 48 OF 49Page 168 of 184 CI T Y O F U N I V E R S I T Y P A R K FY 2 0 1 2 B U D G E T 47 - 3 4 W A R E H O U S E LI N E I T E M S AC T U A L 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 BU D G E T 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 PR O P O S E D 20 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 CH A N G E $ C H A N G E % 62 0 0 E Q U I P R E P A I R S / N O N V E H I C L E $ 2 , 7 5 7 $ 3 , 5 0 0 $ 3 , 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 63 3 0 R A D I O S E R V I C E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! OU T S I D E S E R V I C E S $ 3 , 4 6 0 $ 4 , 8 4 1 $ 4 , 8 4 1 $ 0 0 . 0 % 71 5 0 D U E S & S U B S C R I P T I O N S $ 4 5 $ 8 0 $ 8 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 71 5 5 V E H I C L E R E L A T E D E X P E N S E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 71 7 0 T R A V E L E X P E N S E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 72 0 1 C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T B E L O W $ 5 0 $1 , 0 8 8 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 72 0 2 M I C R O C O M P U T E R S O F T W A R E $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 72 2 1 O T H E R E X P E N S E $ 0 $ 3 0 0 $ 3 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 72 4 0 T U I T I O N & T R A I N I N G $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 72 6 0 E Q U I P M E N T R E N T A L $ 0 $ 5 0 0 $ 5 0 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 74 7 5 I M P R O V E M E N T S - - U N D E R $ 5 0 0 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! OT H E R $ 1 , 1 3 3 $ 8 8 0 $ 8 8 0 $ 0 0 . 0 % 90 0 0 C A P I T A L E Q U I P M E N T R E P L A C E $ 0 $ 1 , 9 8 0 $ 2 , 2 2 8 $ 2 4 8 1 2 . 5 % 91 0 0 O F F I C E E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 91 1 0 R A D I O E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 92 0 1 M I C R O C O M P U T E R E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 95 7 0 W A R E H O U S E E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! 95 7 5 G A R A G E E Q U I P M E N T $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 # D I V / 0 ! CA P I T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S $ 0 $ 1 , 9 8 0 $ 2 , 2 2 8 $ 2 4 8 1 2 . 5 % TO T A L W A R E H O U S E $ 2 5 4 , 8 1 0 $ 2 6 5 , 6 4 0 $ 2 5 6 , 7 1 5 - $ 8 , 9 2 5 - 3 . 4 % 47 - 3 4 W A R E H O U S E PAGE 49 OF 49Page 169 of 184 http://www.uptexas.org/Index.cfm?FuseAction=Page&PageID=408&PageContentID=4587&Preview=1 City Council considers proposed FY2012 budget The City Council will hold public hearings for August 23 and September 6 on the fiscal year 2011-2012 (FY2012) proposed budget and tax rate. City Manager Bob Livingston describes the proposed budget as “quiet—there is no tax increase, no water or sewer or sanitation rate increases, no new positions, and no market based pay raises.” The resulting $43.0 million budget is actually 0.51% lower than last year’s $43.2 million budget, and it collects fewer property taxes than last year. For the second year in a row, the city’s assessed taxable property value fell, by 2.44%. The assessed market value of the average single-family home fell from $1,120,199 to $1,093,015, a 2.43% decline. Key elements of the proposed FY2012 budget include: ● Lower property tax revenues, which result from keeping the $0.27845 tax rate while the taxable base declines 2.44%. This means $387,311 less in new property taxes. The average single family homeowner will pay $60 less in taxes than last year. ● No increase in water, wastewater, or sanitation rates. ● Balanced General, Utility, and Sanitation Fund budgets. ● A reduction of two full-time positions. ● No market based pay raise for employees. About 20% of the employees may be eligible for separate 3% merit increases. ● Level support for the University Park public library -- $196,555, the same as FY2011 – while preparation for the library’s move to the Plaza at Preston Center continues. ● Continued investment in automation and effective use of technology, totaling $695,000. ● Level pay-as-you-go capital project funding, $5.2 million. The City’s tax levy makes up just 14% of a University Park taxpayer’s total bill. Dallas County (and related entities) and HPISD comprise the majority of the local tax bill. The budget adoption process includes several opportunities for residents to review and comment upon the proposed FY 2012 budget. First, the City Council refers the proposed budget to three City advisory committees: Employee Benefits; Finance; and Property and Casualty Liability Insurance. The committees review the budget and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding adoption. HOME REGISTER CONTACT US SITE MAP http://www.uptexas.org/Index.cfm?FuseAction=Page&PageID=408&PageContentID=4587&Preview=1 (1 of 2) [8/11/2011 4:33:31 PM] Page 170 of 184 http://www.uptexas.org/Index.cfm?FuseAction=Page&PageID=408&PageContentID=4587&Preview=1 Next, the Council holds public hearings about the budget. Fewer hearings are required this year because property taxes are not increasing. Hearings will occur at the August 23 and September 6. Finally, the budget and property tax rate will be considered for action at the September 6 City Council meeting. The new budget will take effect October 1, 2011. To learn more about the proposed FY2012 budget, click here: FY2012 CM Proposed Budget package.pdf Copyright 2006 City of University Park. All Rights Reserved. Legal Statment. http://www.uptexas.org/Index.cfm?FuseAction=Page&PageID=408&PageContentID=4587&Preview=1 (2 of 2) [8/11/2011 4:33:31 PM] Page 171 of 184 1 August 23, 2011 Page 172 of 184 2 FY2012 budget proposes same tax rate as FY2011=27.845 cents Decrease in tax base and home values means lower tax revenues and smaller tax bills Average single-family home will pay $60 g g ypy less than last year because of value drop Page 173 of 184 3 Page 174 of 184 4 City property tax as percent of total tax bill Pl 6%Personnel -2.6% Treatment charges +2.4% Capital projects +0% Electricity costs +6.6% Equipment replacement +8.9% Fl %Fuel + 0.7% Page 175 of 184 5 Page 176 of 184 6 Page 177 of 184 7 Page 178 of 184 8 Building permits level Sales tax up Direct alarm sales up Page 179 of 184 9 Page 180 of 184 10 No increase in water rates No increase in sewer rates No increase in sanitation rates Page 181 of 184 AGENDAMEMO (8/23/2011AGENDA) TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil FROM:GerryBradley,ParksDirector SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:toreviewbidsandawardacontractforPardoePar k/ HuntersGlenmedianimprovements BACKGROUND: OnThursday,August11,2011,staffreceivedbidsf orlandscapeupgradesforbothPardoePark (UniversityBlvd.medians)andmedianimprovements atHuntersGlenandDruid.Bothofthese projectsareidentifiedwithintheParksDepartment s2011-12CIPprogram.Atotalofeight contractorsreviewedtheplansandtwocontractors submittedbidsontheproject.Thefollowingare thebidstabulationfortheprojects: StaffmetwithCannonLandscapeandIrrigationtod iscussseveralitemsinvolving“Value Engineering”tonegotiateanactualprojectcost.Thenegotiationhasresultedinthefollowingcost breakdown: Company BidProposal CannonLandscapeandIrrigation $244,600.00 ColeConstruction $277,004.00 ProjectScope Contractor BaseBid Landscapingandirrigation Cannon $218,700.00 ConstructionManagement Fees GCS$17,498.00 FeesandOwner’s Expenses ArchitecturalFees ByCity Printing $1,000.00 BuildingCode Review/Inspections ByCity Miscellaneous Contingencies ConstructionContingency $10,000.00 ProjectTotalBudget $247,196.00 RECOMMENDATION: StaffrecommendstheCityCouncilapprovethetotal projectbudgetforPardoeParkandHuntersGlen mediansfor $247,196.00. Page 182 of 184 FUNDINGSOURCE: 2011-2012ParksCIPBudget ATTACHMENTS: LetterfromGallagherConstruction Page 183 of 184 August 23, 2011 Mr. Bob Livingston, City Manager City Of University Park 3800 University Drive University Park, TX 75205 Re: University Boulevard/Hunter’s Glen/Druid Lane Median Modifications – 2011 Mr. Livingston: The City of University Park received competitive sealed proposals for the above referenced project on Thursday, August 11, 2011. Please refer to the following proposal tabulation for results. After evaluating each competitive proposal, Gallagher Construction Services recommends that the City of University Park award a contract to Cannon Landscaping in the amount of Two Hundred Eighteen Thousand Seven Hundred Dollars ($218,700) and establish the budget for this project based on the attached project total sheet. We recommend that the City award this contract contingent upon further negotiations with the City’s Representative and receipt of the required insurance and bonds and if the awarded contractor does not provide them, award is made to the next responsible low proposer pending successful price negotiation. Gallagher Construction Services is once again honored for the opportunity to work with the City of University Park. Sincerely, GALLAGHER CONSTRUCTION SERVICES Von Gallagher, President cc: Bud Smallwood – City of University Park Gerry Bradley – City of University Park PO Box 941209 Plano, TX 75094-1209 2600 Technology Dr., Suite 400 Plano, TX 75074 972.633.0564 972.633.0164 Fax www.gallaghertx.com Page 184 of 184