HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012.09.18 City Council AgendaCITYOFUNIVERSITYPARK
REGULARCITYCOUNCILMEETING
LOCATION:CITYHALLCOUNCILCHAMBER
AGENDA#2846
SEPTEMBER18,2012
CALLTOORDER:5:00P.M.
3:00-4:00P.M.EXECUTIVESESSION:PursuanttotheauthoritygrantedinSection551.07 2ofthe
GovernmentCode,theCityCouncilwilladjourninto aclosedmeetingtodiscussthe
leaseofrealpropertyforpublicpurposes;and,pu rsuanttotheauthoritygrantedin
Section551.071(2)oftheGovernmentCode,theCity Councilwilladjournintoa
closedmeetingtoconductaprivilegedcommunicatio nwiththeCityAttorney
concerninglegalissuesinvolvedintheleaseofce rtainrealpropertyforpublic
purposes.Noactionwillbetaken.ExecutiveConf erenceRoom,CityHall.
4:00-5:00P.M.WORKSESSIONFORAGENDAREVIEW:theCouncilwillconveneintoopen
worksessiontoreceiveagendaitembriefingsfrom staff.Noactionwillbetaken.
CouncilConferenceRoom,2ndfloor,CityHall.
TOSPEAKONANAGENDAITEM
AnyonewishingtoaddresstheCouncilonanyitemm ustfilloutagreen“RequesttoSpeak”formand
returnittotheCitySecretary.Whencalledforwar dbytheMayor,beforebeginningtheirremarks,spe akers
areaskedtogotothepodiumandstatetheirname andaddressfortherecord.
I.CALLTOORDER
A.INVOCATION:CouncilmemberTommyStewart
B.PLEDGEOFALLEGIANCE:CouncilmemberTommySte wart/BoyScouts
C.INTRODUCTIONOFCOUNCIL:MayorW.RichardDav is
D.INTRODUCTIONOFSTAFF:CityManagerBobLivin gston
II.AWARDSANDRECOGNITION
A.PRESENTATION:of2012AchievementofExcellenc einProcurementAward
III.CONSENTAGENDA
A.CONSIDERANDACT:onarequestbyChristtheK ingtoconducta5Kbenefitrun
B.CONSIDERANDACT:onbidsreceivedforstreetpaving,curbandgutter ,and
drainageimprovementsatvariouslocations
C.CONSIDERANDACT:anordinanceauthorizingtheMayortoexecuteaqui tclaim
deedforcertainproperty
D.CONSIDERANDACT:onfinalpaymenttoJohnBurnsConstructionCompany of
Texas,Inc.forinstallationofwater,sanitarysew er,andstreet/alleypavementat
variouslocations
E.CONSIDERANDACT:onselectionof3rdGenerationEngineeringforwate rand
wastewaterratestudy
Page 1 of 104
F.CONSIDERANDACT:onacontractforFoodEstablishmentInspectionsan d
EnvironmentalHealthServiceswithDallasCountyHe althandHumanServices
(DCHHS)forFY2013
G.CONSIDERANDACT:onapprovalofminutesoftheSeptember4,2012Cit y
CouncilMeeting
IV.MAINAGENDA
A.PUBLICHEARING:onarequesttoamendthedetailedsiteplanforPl anned
DevelopmentDistrictPD-1-Rtoexpandtheexistingconveniencestoresituated at7035
SniderPlaza
B.CONSIDERANDACT:onanordinanceamendingthedetailedsiteplanfor property
situatedat7035SniderPlaza
C.CONSIDERANDACT:onaresolutionamendingFY2 012capitalbudget
D.CONSIDERANDACT:onaresolutionadoptingthe FY2013capitalbudget
E.CONSIDERANDACT:onarequestfromaresidentforspecificimproveme ntsto
HolmesAquaticCenterconcessionsarea
V.PUBLICCOMMENTS
AnyonewishingtoaddressanitemnotontheAgenda shoulddosoatthistime.Pleasebe
advisedthatundertheTexasOpenMeetingsAct,the Councilcannotdiscussoractatthis
meetingonamatterthatisnotlistedontheAgend a.However,inresponsetoaninquiry,a
Councilmembermayrespondwithastatementofspec ificfactualinformationora
recitationofexistingpolicy.ItistheCouncil’spolicytorequestthatcitizensnotaddress
itemsthatarecurrentlyscheduledforafutureage nda orpublichearing.Instead,theCouncil
requeststhatcitizensattendthatspecificmeeting toexpresstheiropinions,orcommentto
theCouncilbye-mailatCity-Council@uptexas.orgorletteraddressedtotheMayo rand
Councilat3800UniversityBlvd.,UniversityPark,Texas75205.Otherquestionsorprivate
commentsfortheCityCouncilorStaffshouldbedi rectedtothatindividualimmediately
followingthemeeting.
AsauthorizedbySection551.071(2)oftheTexasGo vernmentCode,thismeetingmaybeconvened
intoClosedExecutiveSessionforthepurposeofse ekingconfidentiallegaladvicefromtheCity
AttorneyonanyAgendaitemslistedherein.
Page 2 of 104
AGENDAMEMO
(9/18/2012AGENDA)
TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil
FROM:LizSpector
SUBJECT:PRESENTATION:of2012AchievementofExcellencein ProcurementAward
BACKGROUND:
TheAEPAwardprogramissponsoredbytheNational PurchasingInstitute,inpartnershipwithseven
otherpublicpurchasingorganizations.Eachyeart heAwardisgiventoorganizationswho
demonstrateprocurementexcellenceinareaslikein novation,e-procurement,productivity,and
leadership.Forthe12thconsecutiveyear,theCit y'sPurchasingDepartment,ledbyPurchasingAgent
ChristineGreen,hasbeenselectedtoreceivethea ward.
Page 3 of 104
AGENDAMEMO
(9/18/2012AGENDA)
TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil
FROM:GaryW.Adams,ChiefofPolice
SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onarequestbyChristtheKingt oconducta5Kbenefitrun
BACKGROUND:
ChristtheKingrequeststousecertaincitystreet stoconducta5krunraisingfundsforscholarship sto
benefitstudentsofitssisterschool,OurLadyof PerpetualHelp,inhonorofaChristtheKingstude nt
whopassedawaylastsummer.Theschoolhopesto helpachildwhowouldotherwisenotbeableto
affordaCatholicprivateschooleducation.
Raceorganizershopetohave250-400participants.Severalvolunteerswillbestationedalongthe
racerouteandoff-dutyofficerswillbehiredifn eeded.Theraceshouldbeginat8:00a.m.and
concludeby9:30a.m.
Aflierdetailingtheracewillbedistributedtoa llhomesalongtherouteatleasttwoweekspriort othe
event.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staffrecommendsapproval.
ATTACHMENTS:
ChristtheKing5KRaceRequest
ChristtheKing5KRaceRoute
Page 4 of 104
Page 5 of 104
Page 6 of 104
Page 7 of 104
AGENDAMEMO
(9/18/2012AGENDA)
TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil
FROM:GeneR.Smallwood,P.E.;DirectorofPublicWorks
SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onbidsreceivedforstreetpaving,curbandgutter ,and
drainageimprovementsatvariouslocations
BACKGROUND:
Pursuanttocertainprojectsidentifiedinthe2012 CapitalImprovementsPlan,advertisementswere
placedinthe ParkCitiesNews onAugust9,2012andAugust16,2012forsolicita tionofbidsfor
reconstructionofdrainage,curbandgutter,andst reet/alleypavinginthefollowinglocations:
*IntersectionofDurham,Dublin,andAmherst
*RepairsatnumeroussectionsoftheMcFarlinme dian,eastfromGolftothealleywestofHillcrest
*EastendofBarnesPark(intersectionofTurtle CreekBlvdandPurdue)
*4400blockofLarchmont,generallyalongtheno rthcurbline
FourbidswerereceivedonSeptember10th,however,onebidwasdeterminedtobeincomplete.The
lowbidintheamountof$775,856.75wassubmitted byCaminoConstruction,Lewisville,TX.A
copyofthebidtabulationisattachedforCouncil'sreview.
EngineeringDivisionstaffreviewedCamino'scontra ctdocumentsandreferencesonsimilar
municipalprojects.
RECOMMENDATION:
StaffrecommendsCityCouncilapprovalofthelowb idintheamountof$775,856.75receivedfrom
CaminoConstructionandauthorizetheCityManager toexecutethecontract.
FUNDINGSOURCE:
CAPITALPROJECTSFUND
AcctNo44.44.4410
ProjectNo49260.2300
ATTACHMENTS:
BIDTAB
Page 8 of 104
Bid Tabulations for Paving and DrainageImprovements for Various Locations- Project No. 49260 September 10, 2012
Item UnitTotalUnitTotalUnitTotalUnitTotal
No.Quanti
ty
Uni
t
Description Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount
Camino ConstructionSYB Construction
LOCATION 1 - 3400-3600 Blocks of McFarlin Boulevard Medians
Rebcon CPS Civil
1 1LSMobilization 4,000.00$4,000.007,000.00$7,000.006,000.00$6,000.00 5,800.00$5,800.00
2 2MONTBarricades,Signs,andTraffic
Handling 2,000.00$4,000.002,500.00$5,000.001,800.00$3,600.00 2,000.00$4,000.00
3 850LFSawed Breakout line-Full Depth 6.00$5,100.003.00$2,550.004.00$3,400.005.00$4,250.00
LOCATION 1 - 3400-3600 Blocks of McFarlin Boulevard Medians
4 750LFRemove Existing 30" Reinforced
Concrete Curb and Gutter 10.00$7,500.0017.00$12,750.0010.00$7,500.0010.00$7,500.00
5
750LF30" Reinforced Concrete Curb and
Gutter Class "C", 6 Sack, 3600
PSI@28 Days
35.00$26,250.0052.00$39,000.0039.00$29,250.0030.00$22,500.00
1EARemove and Replace 5' Inlet Top.
6
1 EA Remove and Replace 5' Inlet Top.
(Includes inlet throat and any with
variable height curb)
3,300.00$3,300.001,800.00$1,800.003,150.00$3,150.00 2,700.00$2,700.00
7
4EARemove and Replace 6' Inlet Top.
(Includes inlet throat and any with
variable height curb)
3,500.00$14,000.002,000.00$8,000.003,360.00$13,440.003,000.00$12,000.00
8 1LS Provide Horizontal and Vertical Control 1,500.00 $1,500.00 500.00 $500.00 2,700.00 $2,700.00 2,500.00 $2,500.0081,500.00 $1,500.00 500.00 $500.00 2,700.00 $2,700.00 2,500.00 $2,500.00
Subtotal for Location 1$65,650.00$76,600.00$69,040.00$61,250.00
1 1LSMobilization 3,800.00$3,800.0019,000.00$19,000.0019,000.00$19,000.0023,900.00$23,900.00
LOCATION 2 - 4400 Block of Larchmont (4412- 4444 Larchmont)
2 3MONTBarricades,Signs,andTraffic
Handling 4,800.00$14,400.001,500.00$4,500.002,900.00$8,700.002,500.00$7,500.00
3 1EALocatingExisting30"StormSewer
Pipe Using Air/Vacuum Excavation 1,000.00$1,000.00900.00$900.003,700.00$3,700.001,000.00$1,000.00
4 1EALocatingExisting6"+/-WaterLine
Using Air/Vacuum Excavation 1,000.00$1,000.00900.00$900.003,200.00$3,200.001,000.00$1,000.00Using Air/Vacuum Excavation
5 2200LFSawed Breakout line-Full Depth 6.00$13,200.002.00$4,400.004.00$8,800.004.00$8,800.00
Page 9 of 104
Bid Tabulations for Paving and DrainageImprovements for Various Locations- Project No. 49260 September 10, 2012
6
310SYRemoveExistingAsph.Concrete
Pvmt.w/Reinf.ConcreteBase(4"
HMACAverageand6"Concrete
Base, Includes 6" Curb)
11.00$3,410.0013.00$4,030.0014.00$4,340.0020.00$6,200.00
7 20SYRemoveExisting4"+/-Reinforced
Concrete Sidewalk 9.00$180.0015.00$300.009.00$180.0015.00$300.00
275 SY Remove Existing 6"+/-Reinforced8275SYRemoveExisting6"+/-Reinforced
Concrete Driveway 9.00$2,475.0015.00$4,125.0011.40$3,135.0015.00$4,125.00
9 4EA.Remove Existing Barrier-free Ramps 320.00$1,280.00300.00$1,200.00600.00$2,400.00700.00 $2,800.00
10 1EA.RemoveExistingReinforcedConcrete
Storm Sewer 10' Recessed Curb Inlet 500.00$500.001,800.00$1,800.00630.00$630.001,000.00 $1,000.00
11 5 EA.Temporary Rock Driveways (Includes 200.00 $1,000.00 1,000.00 $5,000.00 760.00 $3,800.00 1,000.00 $5,000.00115EA.Temporary Rock Driveways (Includes
placement and removal)200.00$1,000.001,000.00$5,000.00760.00$3,800.001,000.00$5,000.00
12 1EAInstall 21" X 21" 60° Bend 130.00$130.00400.00$400.00800.00$800.00500.00$500.00
13
550LF21"ClassIIIReinforcedConcretePipe
w/RecycledConcreteMixBackfilland
Embedment Select Backfill Material 114.00$62,700.00114.00$62,700.00118.00$64,900.00200.00$110,000.00Embedment Select Backfill Material
14
2EA Construct Recessed 10'Curb Inlet
(Includes10'Upstreamand10'
DownstreamVariableHeight
Curb)(Top to Flowline Depth 4'-6")
4,300.00$8,600.004,400.00$8,800.003,600.00$7,200.00 3,000.00$6,000.00
1EAConstructReinforcedConcreteStorm
Drain Manhole Over Existing 30"15 Drain Manhole Over Existing 30"
Storm Sewer Pipe 4,000.00$4,000.005,000.00$5,000.005,800.00$5,800.00 4,000.00$4,000.00
16
1EAConnectProposed21"ClassIII
ReinforcedConcretePipetoProposed
Storm Drain Manhole 260.00$260.00200.00$200.00425.00$425.00500.00$500.00
17 1EAInstall 18" Bulkhead - Precast Plug by
Hanson or Equivalent 575.00$575.00200.00$200.00300.00$300.00300.00$300.00
18 375SYCompacted Subgrade - 95% Standard
Proctor (Usual 6" Depth)2.10$787.504.00$1,500.008.00$3,000.005.00$1,875.00
19
125SYTemporaryPavementRepair(2"
HMAC and Recycled Concrete Mix 13.25 $1,656.25 15.00 $1,875.00 24.00 $3,000.00 15.00 $1,875.0019HMACandRecycledConcreteMix
Backfill)(Costincludesplacement,
maintenance, and removal)
13.25 $1,656.25 15.00 $1,875.00 24.00 $3,000.00 15.00 $1,875.00
Page 10 of 104
Bid Tabulations for Paving and DrainageImprovements for Various Locations- Project No. 49260 September 10, 2012
20
30LF8"D.I.PipeClass51w/PolyWrap
w/RecycledConcreteMixBackfilland
Embedment(Cutattopofpipefrom8'
to 42")
179.00$5,370.0066.00$1,980.00128.00$3,840.00200.00$6,000.00
21
1LSWaterMainLowering(From4'+/-to8'
+/-,CentererdonStormSewer5')(
Includes fittings,polywrap,and joint 8,500.00 $8,500.00 4,500.00 $4,500.00 3,900.00 $3,900.00 3,000.00 $3,000.0021Includesfittings,polywrap,and joint
restraint)
8,500.00 $8,500.00 4,500.00 $4,500.00 3,900.00 $3,900.00 3,000.00 $3,000.00
22 2EAConnecttoExisting6"WaterLine
(Includes 8"x6" Reducer) Per Location 852.00$1,704.00500.00$1,000.001,100.00$2,200.002,000.00$4,000.00
23 1LS Water System Test 2,300.00$2,300.00800.00$800.002,000.00$2,000.002,000.00$2,000.00
310 SY 8"Reinforced Concrete Paving Class
24
310 SY 8"Reinforced Concrete Paving Class
"C",6Sack,3600PSI@28Daysw/6"
Curb & w/ Asphalt Inset
75.00$23,250.00110.00$34,100.0075.00$23,250.0050.00 $15,500.00
25
31SY4"ReinforcedConcreteSidewalk
Class "A", 5 Sack, 3000 PSI@28 Days 45.00$1,395.0045.00$1,395.0045.00$1,395.0040.00$1,240.00
105 SY 6"Reinforced Concrete Driveway
26
105 SY 6"Reinforced Concrete Driveway
Class "C", 6 Sack, 3600 PSI@28 Days 45.00$4,725.0060.00$6,300.0047.50$4,987.5060.00$6,300.00
27
2EA.Barrier-freeRamps(ADACompliant)
(BricktobesuppliedbyCityof
University Park)
1,500.00$3,000.001,500.00$3,000.001,600.00$3,200.00 1,500.00$3,000.00
28 250SYReplacePlantMaterial(Bermuda,St.
Augustine, Asian Jasmine, Or Other) 10.00 $2,500.00 7.00 $1,750.00 10.00 $2,500.00 10.00 $2,500.0028Augustine, Asian Jasmine, Or Other) 10.00 $2,500.00 7.00 $1,750.00 10.00 $2,500.00 10.00 $2,500.00
29 2EAStormwaterCurbOpenings(Neenah
R3262-1)200.00$400.00400.00$800.00200.00$400.00400.00$800.00
30 1LSTrench Safety Design & Installation 750.00$750.001,000.00$1,000.00900.00$900.003,000.00 $3,000.00
31 1LS Provide Horizontal and Vertical Control 2,000.00$2,000.003,000.00$3,000.002,650.00$2,650.00 2,000.00$2,000.00312,000.00 $2,000.00 3,000.00 $3,000.00 2,650.00 $2,650.00 2,000.00 $2,000.00
32 1LSStormSewerVideoInspection
(Televised after subgrade accepted)1,200.00$1,200.001,000.00$1,000.001,400.00$1,400.00 500.00$500.00
Subtotal for Location 2$178,047.75$187,455.00$195,932.50$236,515.00
LOCATION 3 - Amherst, Durham, and Dublin Intersection
1 1LSMobilization 30,000.00$30,000.0050,000.00$50,000.0041,000.00$41,000.0048,000.00$48,000.00
2 6MONTBarricades,Signs,andTraffic
Handling 2,250.00$13,500.002,000.00$12,000.003,000.00$18,000.001,500.00$9,000.00
Page 11 of 104
Bid Tabulations for Paving and DrainageImprovements for Various Locations- Project No. 49260 September 10, 2012
3 1EARemove existing fire hydrant and 6"
valve 270.00$270.00165.00$165.00235.00$235.00500.00$500.00
4 27LFRemove existing 6" water line 12.00$324.005.00$135.0032.00$864.0070.00$1,890.00
5 1EAConstructFireHydrantAssemblywith
6" valve 4,000.00$4,000.003,900.00$3,900.004,410.00$4,410.00 5,000.00$5,000.00
1 EA Connect to Existing 6"Water Line
6 1 EA Connect to Existing 6"Water Line
(Includes 6" 90° Bend) Per Location 600.00$600.002,200.00$2,200.001,200.00$1,200.002,000.00$2,000.00
7
10LFInstall6"D.I.PipeClass51w/Poly
Wrapw/RecycledConcreteBackfill
and Embedment
100.00$1,000.0044.00$440.00175.00$1,750.00200.00$2,000.00
8 1LSWater System Test 1,000.00$1,000.00600.00$600.001,500.00$1,500.00700.00$700.00
9
419LF36"ClassIIIReinforcedConcretePipe
w/RecycledConcreteMixBackfilland
Embedment
258.00$108,102.00205.00$85,895.00218.00$91,342.00230.00$96,370.00
10
21LF27"ClassIIIReinforcedConcretePipe
w/RecycledConcreteMixBackfilland
Embedment
169.00$3,549.00146.00$3,066.00227.00$4,767.00210.00 $4,410.00
Embedment
11
353LF21"ClassIIIReinforcedConcretePipe
w/RecycledConcreteMixBackfilland
Embedment
160.00$56,480.00117.00$41,301.00183.00$64,599.00200.00$70,600.00
12
20LFRemove Existing 60" Reinforced
Concrete Pipe 65.00$1,300.0017.00$340.0086.00$1,720.0040.00$800.00
31 LF Remove Existing 48"Reinforced1331LFRemoveExisting48"Reinforced
Concrete Pipe 65.00$2,015.0014.00$434.0069.00$2,139.0035.00$1,085.00
14 107LFRemove Existing 36" Reinforced
Concrete Pipe 37.00$3,959.0011.00$1,177.0093.00$9,951.0030.00$3,210.00
15 30LFRemove Existing 24" Reinforced
Concrete Pipe 36.00$1,080.009.00$270.0038.00$1,140.0025.00$750.00
36 LF Remove Existing 21"Reinforced
16 36 LF Remove Existing 21"Reinforced
Concrete Pipe 34.00$1,224.009.00$324.0032.00$1,152.0020.00$720.00
17 34LF Remove Existing 18"Reinforced
Concrete Pipe 30.00$1,020.008.00$272.0032.00$1,088.0020.00$680.00
18 7EAInstall 36" X 21" 60° Wye 260.00$1,820.00300.00$2,100.001,500.00$10,500.00500.00$3,500.00
19 1 EA Install 27" X 21" 60° Wye 200.00 $200.00 300.00 $300.00 1,100.00 $1,100.00 500.00 $500.00191EAInstall 27" X 21" 60° Wye 200.00 $200.00 300.00 $300.00 1,100.00 $1,100.00 500.00 $500.00
20 1EAInstall 21" X 21" 60° Bend 130.00$130.00300.00$300.00900.00$900.00350.00$350.00
21 3EA Install 36"Bulkhead -Precast Plug by
Hanson or Equivalent 800.00$2,400.00220.00$660.00270.00$810.00500.00$1,500.00
Page 12 of 104
Bid Tabulations for Paving and DrainageImprovements for Various Locations- Project No. 49260 September 10, 2012
22 1EA Install 24"Bulkhead -Precast Plug by
Hanson or Equivalent 700.00$700.00150.00$150.00210.00$210.00400.00$400.00
23 2EAInstall21"Bulkhead-PrecastPlugby
Hanson or Equivalent 600.00$1,200.00140.00$280.00165.00$330.00350.00$700.00
24 1EAInstall18"Bulkhead-PrecastPlugby
Hanson or Equivalent 500.00$500.00110.00$110.00180.00$180.00300.00$300.00
2 EA Connect 36"Class III Reinforced252EAConnect36"Class III Reinforced
Concrete Pipe to Existing 36" 1,000.00$2,000.00900.00$1,800.00600.00$1,200.00500.00$1,000.00
26
1EAConnect36"ClassIIIReinforced
ConcretePipetoExisting36"
Reinforced Concrete Lateral
1,000.00$1,000.00900.00$900.00600.00$600.00500.00$500.00
27
1EAConnect 36" Class III Reinforced
Concrete Pipe to Existing 60" 1,000.00 $1,000.00 1,100.00 $1,100.00 870.00 $870.00 1,000.00 $1,000.0027Concrete Pipe to Existing 60"
Reinforced Concrete Pipe
1,000.00 $1,000.00 1,100.00 $1,100.00 870.00 $870.00 1,000.00 $1,000.00
28
1EAConnect 27" Class III Reinforced
Concrete Pipe to Existing 60"
Reinforced Concrete Pipe
1,000.00$1,000.00300.00$300.00850.00$850.001,000.00 $1,000.00
29
1EAConnect 21" Class III Reinforced
Concrete Pipe to Existing 60" 1,000.00 $1,000.00 300.00 $300.00 850.00 $850.00 900.00 $900.0029Concrete Pipe to Existing 60"
Reinforced Concrete Pipe
1,000.00 $1,000.00 300.00 $300.00 850.00 $850.00 900.00 $900.00
30 1EAConstruct Storm Sewer Manhole 5,200.00$5,200.005,000.00$5,000.004,900.00$4,900.00 5,000.00$5,000.00
31
9EAConstruct14'StandardReinforced
ConcreteCurbInletswithConcrete
Throat and Variable Height Curb
5,200.00$46,800.004,900.00$44,100.004,800.00$43,200.004,000.00$36,000.00
4 EA Construct 10'Standard Reinforced
32
4 EA Construct 10'Standard Reinforced
ConcreteCurbInletswithConcrete
Throat and Variable Height Curb
4,400.00$17,600.003,900.00$15,600.003,800.00$15,200.00$0.00
33 2EARemoveExistingReinforcedConcrete
10' Curb Inlets 500.00$1,000.002,000.00$4,000.00700.00$1,400.00$0.00
34 1EARemoveExistingReinforcedConcrete
11' Curb Inlets 550.00$550.002,000.00$2,000.00700.00$700.00$0.003411' Curb Inlets 550.00 $550.00 2,000.00 $2,000.00 700.00 $700.00 $0.00
35 1EARemoveExistingReinforcedConcrete
13.9' Curb Inlets 650.00$650.002,500.00$2,500.00965.00$965.00$0.00
36 1EARemoveExistingReinforcedConcrete
14.6' Curb Inlets 700.00$700.002,500.00$2,500.001,010.00$1,010.00$0.00
37 1EARemoveExistingReinforcedConcrete
16.4' Curb Inlets 775.00$775.003,000.00$3,000.001,200.00$1,200.00$0.0016.4' Curb Inlets
38 1EARemoveExistingReinforcedConcrete
22.2' Curb Inlets 1,050.00$1,050.003,500.00$3,500.001,550.00$1,550.00 $0.00
39 1EARemoveExistingReinforcedConcrete
49.2' Curb Inlets 3,250.00$3,250.009,000.00$9,000.003,400.00$3,400.00 $0.00
Page 13 of 104
Bid Tabulations for Paving and DrainageImprovements for Various Locations- Project No. 49260 September 10, 2012
40 1EARemoveExistingReinforcedConcrete
54.3' Curb Inlets 3,835.00$3,835.0010,000.00$10,000.004,500.00$4,500.00$0.00
41 3EARemove Existing Crape Myrtle Tree
(3101 Amherst)325.00$975.00150.00$450.00950.00$2,850.00$0.00
42 1781LFSawed Breakout line-Full Depth 6.00$10,686.003.00$5,343.004.00$7,124.00$0.00
102 SY Remove Existing 4" ± Reinforced 43 102 SY Remove Existing 4" ± Reinforced
Concrete Sidewalk
9.00$918.0012.00$1,224.009.00$918.00$0.00
44 1532SYRemoveExisting6"±Reinforced
Concrete Pavement 11.00$16,852.0015.00$22,980.0010.90$16,698.80$0.00
45 316SYRemoveAsph.ConcretePvmt.w/
Reinf. Concrete Base (4" HMAC 11.00$3,476.0020.00$6,320.0013.50$4,266.00$0.00
46 316 SY Replace Asph.Concrete Pvmt.w/84.00 $26,544.00 95.00 $30,020.00 85.00 $26,860.00 $0.00LE
T
E
46 316 SY Replace Asph.Concrete Pvmt.w/
Reinf. Concrete Base (4" HMAC 84.00$26,544.0095.00$30,020.0085.00$26,860.00$0.00
47 9SYRemoveExisting6"±Reinforced
Concrete Driveway 9.00$81.0050.00$450.0012.70$114.30$0.00
48 143LFRemoveExisting30"WideReinforced
Concrete Paving with 6" Integral Curb 10.00$1,430.0010.00$1,430.008.50$1,215.50$0.00
49 9 SY 6"Reinforced Concrete Driveway with 45.00 $405.00 90.00 $810.00 50.00 $450.00 $0.00
IN
C
O
M
P
L
49 9 SY 6"Reinforced Concrete Driveway with
Monolithic 6" Variable Height Curb, 45.00 $405.00 90.00 $810.00 50.00 $450.00 $0.00
50 1438SY6"ReinforcedConcretePavingwith
Monolithic 6" Curb, Class "C" 6 Sack, 60.00$86,280.0065.00$93,470.0048.00$69,024.00$0.00
51 65SY4"ReinforcedConcreteSidewalk
Class "A", 5 Sack, 3000 PSI@28 Days 45.00$2,925.0036.00$2,340.0045.00$2,925.00$0.00
52 143LF30"WideReinforcedConcretePaving
with 6" Monolithic Curb 31.00 $4,433.00 35.00 $5,005.00 40.00 $5,720.00 $0.0052with 6" Monolithic Curb 31.00 $4,433.00 35.00 $5,005.00 40.00 $5,720.00 $0.00
53 1924SYCompactedSubgrade-95%Standard
Proctor (Usual 6" Depth)3.00$5,772.003.00$5,772.005.30$10,197.20$0.00
54 4EABarrier-Free Ramps (ADA Compliant) 1,500.00$6,000.001,500.00$6,000.001,650.00$6,600.00 $0.00
55 1EAAdjustExistingManholetoMatchTop
of Paving 1,000.00$1,000.00500.00$500.00500.00$500.00$0.00of Paving
56
375SYReplacePlantMaterial(Bermuda,St.
Augustine,AsianJasmine,OrOther)
(ContractorMustReplaceWithSame
Plant Material)
10.00$3,750.007.00$2,625.0010.00$3,750.00$0.00
57
1LSStormSewerVideoInspection
(Televised after subgrade accepted)900.00 $900.00 1,700.00 $1,700.00 1,600.00 $1,600.00 $0.0057(Televised after subgrade accepted)900.00 $900.00 1,700.00 $1,700.00 1,600.00 $1,600.00 $0.00
58
1LSProvide,installandmaintainThe
StormWaterPollutionPreventionPlan
(SWP3)
8,000.00$8,000.002,000.00$2,000.004,500.00$4,500.00 $0.00
Page 14 of 104
Bid Tabulations for Paving and DrainageImprovements for Various Locations- Project No. 49260 September 10, 2012
59 1LS Provide Horizontal and Vertical Control 5,000.00$5,000.005,000.00$5,000.005,500.00$5,500.00 $0.00
Subtotal for Location 3$509,210.00$505,458.00$514,094.80$480,484.00
1 LS Mobilization
LOCATION 4 - 7325 Turtle Creek (Barnes Park bounded by Purdue,Thackery, and Turtle Creek)
1 1 LS Mobilization 3,500.00$3,500.002,000.00$2,000.002,000.00$2,000.00 #VALUE!
2 1MONTBarricades,Signs,andTraffic
Handling 3,000.00$3,000.001,000.00$1,000.001,800.00$1,800.00 $0.00
3 200LFSawed Breakout line-Full Depth 6.00$1,200.003.00$600.004.00$800.00$0.00
4 42 LF Remove Existing 30" Reinforced 10.00 $420.00 45.00 $1,890.00 12.00 $504.00 $0.00LE
T
E
4 42 LF Remove Existing 30" Reinforced
Concrete Curb and Gutter 10.00$420.0045.00$1,890.0012.00$504.00$0.00
5
150LF30" Reinforced Concrete Curb and
Gutter Class "C", 6 Sack, 3600
PSI@28 Days
82.00$12,300.0085.00$12,750.0042.00$6,300.00$0.00
6
139SYRemove Asph. Concrete Pvmt. w/
Reinf. Concrete Base (4" HMAC 11.00$1,529.0028.00$3,892.0090.00$12,510.00$0.00
IN
C
O
M
P
L
E
6 Reinf. Concrete Base (4" HMAC
Average and 6" Concrete Base)
11.00 $1,529.00 28.00 $3,892.00 90.00 $12,510.00 $0.00
7 1LS Provide Horizontal and Vertical Control 1,000.00$1,000.00300.00$300.001,600.00$1,600.00$0.00
Subtotal for Location 4$22,949.00$22,432.00$25,514.00$16,620.00
``
$65,650.00$76,600.00$69,040.00$61,250.00
LOCATION 1 - 3400-3600 Blocks of McFarlin
Boulevard Medians
LOCATION 2 - 4400 Block of Larchmont (4412- 4444
$178,047.75$187,455.00$195,932.50$236,515.00
$509,210.00$505,458.00$514,094.80 $480,484.00
LOCATION 2 - 4400 Block of Larchmont (4412- 4444
Larchmont)
LOCATION 3 - Amherst, Durham, and Dublin
Intersection
$22,949.00$22,432.00$25,514.00 $16,620.00
LOCATION 4 - 7325 Turtle Creek (Barnes Park
bounded by Purdue,Thackery, and Turtle Creek)
Page 15 of 104
Bid Tabulations for Paving and DrainageImprovements for Various Locations- Project No. 49260 September 10, 2012
BID TOTALS $775,856.75$791,945.00$804,581.30 $794,869.00
Page 16 of 104
AGENDAMEMO
(9/18/2012AGENDA)
TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil
FROM:GeneR.Smallwood,P.E.;DirectorofPublicWorks
SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:anordinanceauthorizingtheMayortoexecuteaqui tclaim
deedforcertainproperty
BACKGROUND:
PriortoconstructionoftheBLVDApartmentsimmedi atelynorthofthePeekServiceCenter,theCity
ownedanoutparcelsurroundedbytheoldShamburge rlumberyard.Thatpropertywastradedto
PrescottRealty(developeroftheBLVD)foraprope rtyalongthenorthsideoftheCity'sservice
center.Foruseofthatpropertyduringconstructi onoftheBLVD,Prescottconstructedthenew
parkinglotfortheCity.
Duringconstructionoftheparkinglot,coincidenta lwithfinalsiteimprovementsattheBLVD,a
propertylinediscrepancyarose.Thesamesurveyor providedlegaldescriptionsfortheBLVDplat
andforthepropertytrade,however,anerrorwasm adealongthemutualpropertyline.Thaterrorwas
notdiscovereduntilaftertheBLVDplathadbeenf iled.Theplatincludesasmallsliverofproperty
alongwhatPrescotthaddeededtotheCity.Asdes cribedintheattachment,thetriangularparcelis
about16inchesatthewestendofthecommonprope rtylineandzerosouttowardtheeastproperty
line.
Inadditiontoconstructingtheparkinglot,Presco ttcoveredthecostofenvironmentalremediationfo r
thepropertytheCityreceivedandthepropertyit deededtoPrescott.
RECOMMENDATION:
StaffrecommendsCityCouncilapprovalofanordina nceauthorizingtheMayortoexecuteaquit
claimdeedforthesubjectparcel.
ATTACHMENTS:
ORDINANCE
BLVDApts-QuitClaimDeed
Page 17 of 104
57187
ORDINANCE NO. _________________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK TEXAS,
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION BY THE MAYOR OF A QUIT CLAIM DEED TO A 230
SQUARE FOOT TRACT OF LAND AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AND
DEPICTED IN EXHIBIT “A”, TO THE ABUTTING OWNER, 5640 SMU BLVD, LP; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of University Park, Texas, has determined that a
certain tract of land was erroneously included in the legal description of a lot heretofore conveyed to
the City, said tract being more particularly described and depicted in Exhibit “A”, and to correct
such error, the City should quit claim any interest in the tract in favor of the true owner; Now,
Therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY
PARK, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. The City of University Park hereby quitclaims, in favor of the abutting
owner, 5640 SMU BLVD, LP, any interest in a 230 square foot parcel of land, more particularly
described and depicted in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes, the
same as if fully copied herein.
SECTION 2. That the Mayor is authorized and directed to execute, on behalf of the City, a
Quit Claim Deed of said tract to said abutting owner for recording in the Real Property Records of
Dallas County, Texas.
SECTION 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage, as
the law and Charter in such cases provide.
DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of University Park, Texas, on the ___ day
of _____________ 2012.
Page 18 of 104
57187
APPROVED:
________________________________
W. RICHARD DAVIS, MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
_________________________ ________________________________________
CITY ATTORNEY ELIZABETH SPECTOR, CITY SECRETARY
(RLD/09-07-12/57187)
Page 19 of 104
57187
EXHIBIT “A”
Page 20 of 104
57187
Page 21 of 104
57187
Page 22 of 104
57187
Page 23 of 104
MHDocs 3922994_2 3484.127
“NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: IF YOU ARE A NATURAL PERSON, YOU MAY
REMOVE OR STRIKE ANY OR ALL OF THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION FROM ANY
INSTRUMENT THAT TRANSFERS AN INTEREST IN REAL PROPERTY BEFORE IT IS FILED
FOR RECORD IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS: YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OR YOUR
DRIVER'S LICENSE NUMBER."
QUIT CLAIM DEED
STATE OF TEXAS
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS:
COUNTY OF DALLAS
THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation,
with a mailing address of 3800 University Blvd., University Park, Dallas County,Texas 75205
(hereinafter referred to as “Grantor”) in consideration of the sum of $1.00 and other good and
valuable consideration in hand paid by 5640 SMU BLVD., LP, hereinafter called Grantee, the
receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, has quitclaimed, and by these
presents does quitclaim unto said Grantee, whose address is c/o Prescott Realty, 6060 North
Central Expressway, Suite 101,Dallas, Dallas County, Texas 75206, all of its right, title and
interest in and to that certain LOT 1A, BLOCK B/5185 SHAMBURGER LUMBER
ADDITION, AS SHOWN ON THE FINAL PLAT OF SHAMBURGER LUMBER
ADDITION LOT 1A, BLOCK B/5185 DATED MAY, 2012, AND DULY RECORDED ON
JULY 19, 2012, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 201200209760 IN THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC
RECORDS OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS, including, without limitation, the real property
described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made part hereof for all purposes, the same as if
fully copied herein, and any improvements thereto.
IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT GRANTOR IS NOT MAKING ANY
WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS OF ANY KIND OR CHARACTER, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPERTY, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED
TO, WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS AS TO MATTERS OF TITLE (OTHER
THAN GRANTOR’S WARRANTY OF TITLE SET FORTH HEREIN), ZONING, TAX
CONSEQUENCES, PHYSICAL OR ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION, OPERATING
HISTORY OR PROJECTIONS, VALUATION, GOVERNMENTAL APPROVALS,
GOVERNMENTAL REGULATIONS OR ANY OTHER MATTER OR THING RELATING
TO OR AFFECTING THE PROPERTY. GRANTEE AGREES THAT WITH RESPECT TO
THE PROPERTY, GRANTEE HAS NOT RELIED UPON AND WILL NOT RELY UPON,
EITHER DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, ANY REPRESENTATION OR WARRANTY OF
GRANTOR OR GRANTOR’S REPRESENTATIVES. GRANTEE HAS CONDUCTED
INSPECTIONS AND INVESTIGATIONS OF THE PROPERTY, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
LIMITED TO, THE PHYSICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS THEREOF,
AND IS RELYING UPON SAME, AND ASSUMES THE RISK THAT ADVERSE
MATTERS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADVERSE PHYSICAL AND
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, MAY NOT HAVE BEEN REVEALED BY
Page 24 of 104
MHDocs 3922994_2 3484.127
GRANTEE’S INSPECTIONS AND INVESTIGATIONS. GRANTEE HAS TAKEN
WHATEVER ACTION AND PERFORMED WHATEVER INVESTIGATIONS AND
STUDIES GRANTEE DEEMS NECESSARY TO SATISFY ITSELF AS TO THE
CONDITION OF THE PROPERTY AND THE EXISTENCE OR NONEXISTENCE OF, OR
CURATIVE ACTION TO BE TAKEN WITH RESPECT TO, ANY HAZARDOUS
AND/OR TOXIC SUBSTANCES ON OR DISCHARGED FROM THE PROPERTY.
GRANTEE ACCEPTS THE PROPERTY “AS IS, WHERE IS”, WITH ALL FAULTS AND
THERE ARE NO ORAL OR WRITTEN AGREEMENTS, WARRANTIES OR
REPRESENTATIONS, COLLATERAL TO OR AFFECTING THE PROPERTY BY
GRANTOR OR ANY THIRD PARTY.
To have and to hold all of its right, title and interest in and to the within described property
and premises unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever, so that neither it nor its
successors or assigns shall have, claim or demand any right or title to the aforesaid property,
premises or appurtenances or any part thereof.
EXECUTED this ______ day of __________________ 2012.
GRANTOR
City of University Park, Texas,
By: ______________________________
W. Richard Davis, Mayor
STATE OF TEXAS §
§
COUNTY OF DALLAS §
This instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of ______________
2012, by W. Richard Davis, Mayor of the City of University Park, Texas, Grantor herein, a
municipal corporation, on behalf of said corporation.
__________________________________
Notary Public, State of Texas
My Commission Expires:
_______________________________
Page 25 of 104
MHDocs 3922994_2 3484.127
RETURN TO:
5640 SMU BLVD, LP
c/o Prescott Realty
6060 North Central Expressway, Suite 101
Dallas, Texas 75206
Page 26 of 104
MHDocs 392
DESCRIPTIO
Dallas County
City of Dallas
Dallas Count
BLVD, L.P. r
acre) tract be
for the south r
COMMENCIN
said south lin
variable width
Block B/5185
THENCE, So
Worcola Stree
THENCE, Du
8/5185, a dis
THENCE, So
west line of
Greenville Av
and the north
recorded in In
THENCE, Du
B/5185 and th
point in the sa
THENCE, Du
Worcola Stree
CONTAINING
(A survey plat
The undersign
out the metes
7/17/2012
Registered P
Michael C. Clo
Registered
Consulting
8350 N. Ce
TX Reg. S
22994_2 3484.127
ON, of a 230 s
y, Texas; said t
s, Texas, acco
ty, Texas, and
recorded in In
eing more part
right-of-way lin
NG, "+" cut in
ne of SMU B
h right-of-way, 5
5;
outh 00 degre
et and the wes
ue South, con
stance of 265.
outh 89 degree
Lot 1A, Block
venue (a varia
heast corner
nstrument No, 2
ue West, depa
he north line o
aid east line of
ue North, dep
et and the said
G, 230 square
t of even surve
ned, Registere
s and bounds o
rofessional Lan
over
d Professional
g Engineers, Inc
entral Expwy, #
urveying Firm
Exh
Part of Lot
J
square foot (0
tract being par
ording to the p
d being part o
nstrument No.
ticularly descr
ne of SMU Bou
n concrete fou
oulevard (a 1
56 feet wide a
es, 02 minute
st line of said L
ntinuing along
43 feet to a p
es, 46 minutes
k B/5185, a d
able width righ
of that certai
20080076170
arting the said
of said City of
f Worcola Stre
arting the said
d west line of L
feet or 0.005 a
ey date herew
ed Professiona
of the tract of l
nd Surveyor N
Land Surveyo
c.
1000, Dallas TX
LS-100080-00
ibit “A” 230
1A, Block B/5
Joel Sykes Su
City of Dallas
0.005 acre) tra
rt of Lot 1A, Blo
plat recorded i
of that certain
2010003280
ibed as follow
ulevard accord
nd at the sou
00-foot wide
at this point), sa
es, 13 second
Lot 1A, Block B
the said east
point for corne
s, 57 seconds
distance of 34
ht-of-way), sa
n tract of lan
of said Officia
d west line of G
University Par
eet; said point
d north line of
Lot 1A, Block
acres of land,
with accompan
al Land Survey
land described
No. 5225
r No. 5225 Pac
X 75206 (972) 2
0
SQUARE FO
185, Shambur
urvey, Abstract
s, Dallas Coun
act of land sit
ock B/5185 of
in Instrument
tract of land d
086 of said Of
ws (bearing bas
ding to said pla
uthwest end of
right-of-way)
aid point being
ds East, depar
B/5185, a dista
t line of Worc
er at the POIN
s East, departi
48.04 feet to
aid point being
d described i
l Public Recor
Greenville Av
rk tract, a dista
being the sou
f the City of U
B/5185, a dist
more or less.
nies this descrip
yor, hereby cert
d.
checo Koch
235-3031
OOT TRACT
rger Lumber A
t No. 1338
ty, Texas
tuated in the J
the Shamburg
No. 20120020
described in S
fficial Public R
sis for this sur
at of Shamburg
f a right-of-wa
and the east
g the southern
rting said corn
ance of 165.08
cola Street an
NT OF BEGIN
ng the said ea
a point for co
g the southeas
in Special Wa
rds;
enue and alon
ance of 348.04
uthwest corner
University Par
tance of 1.32 f
iption.)
rtifies that the fo
T
Addition
Joel Sykes Su
ger Lumber Ad
09760 of the O
Special Warra
Records, said
rvey is based o
ger Lumber Ad
ay corner clip
t right-of-way
nmost northwe
ner clip and a
8 feet to a poin
d the said we
NNING;
ast line of Wo
orner in the w
st corner of sa
arranty Deed t
ng the south l
4 feet to a poi
r of said Lot 1A
k tract and al
feet to the POI
oregoing desc
form12393
urvey, Abstrac
ddition, an add
Official Public
anty Deed to
d 230 square
on a bearing o
ddition):
at the interse
line of Worco
est corner of s
along the said
t;
est line of Lot
orcola Street a
west right-of-w
aid Lot 1A, Blo
to City of Univ
line of said Lo
int for corner a
A, Block B/518
ong the said
INT OF BEGIN
cription accurat
ct No. 1338,
dition to the
Records of
5640 SMU
foot (0.005
of Due East
ection of the
ola Street (a
said Lot 1A,
east line of
t 1A, Block
nd the said
way line of
ock B/5185
versity Park
ot 1A, Block
at an angle
85;
east line of
NNING;
tely sets
Page 27 of 104
57171
MHDocs 3922994_2 3484.127
Page 28 of 104
57171
MHDocs 3922994_2 3484.127
Page 29 of 104
57171
MHDocs 3922994_2 3484.127
Page 30 of 104
AGENDAMEMO
(9/18/2012AGENDA)
TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil
FROM:GeneR.Smallwood,P.E.;DirectorofPublicWorks
SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onfinalpaymenttoJohnBurnsConstructionCompany of
Texas,Inc.forinstallationofwater,sanitarysew er,andstreet/alleypavementat
variouslocations
BACKGROUND:
OnMay3,2011,theCityCouncilapprovedacontrac tintheamountof$1,249,887withJohnBurns
ConstructionCompanyofTexas,Inc.forreconstruct ionofwater,sanitarysewer,andstreet/alley
pavementinthefollowinglocations:
*KeyStreet,northfromPotomactotheBinkley-S henandoahalley
*Potomac-Normandyalley,eastfromKeyStreetto Hillcrest
*Hillcrest,southfromPotomac-Normandyalleyto Potomac
*Auburndale,northfromPotomac-Normandyalleyt otheapointjustnorthofNormandy
*Normandy-Shenandoahalley,eastfromKeyStreet toAuburndale
*Shenandoah-Binkleyalley,eastfromKeyStreet toAuburndale
OnJanuary17,2012,theCityCouncilapprovedChan geOrderNo.1intheamountof$115,000to
extendquantitiesintheShenandoah-Normandyalley,eastofAuburndaletoHillcrestforutilitywork
tobeaddedtothecontract.
Thecontractorcompletedworkontheprojectinacc ordancewithplansandspecifications,andthe
projecthasbeenacceptedbytheCity'sEngineering Divisionstaff.Basedonmeasuredquantities,
includingcertainfieldadjustmentsamountingto$2 ,541.45,thefinalconstructioncostis
$1,367,428.45.Thecontractorhasbeenpaid$1,298 ,353.27,leavingafinalpaymentof$69,072.18.
FundsareavailableintheCapitalProjectsFund.
RECOMMENDATION:
StaffrecommendsCityCouncilapprovaloffinalpay mentintheamountof$69,072.18toJohnBurns
ConstructionCompanyofTexas,Inc.forcompletion ofworkonproject47200.
FUNDINGSOURCE:
CAPITALPROJECTSFUND
AcctNo42.42.4430
ProjectNo47200.2300
ATTACHMENTS:
PROJECTSITEPLAN
Page 31 of 104
Page 32 of 104
AGENDAMEMO
(9/18/2012AGENDA)
TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil
FROM:KentR.Austin,DirectorofFinance
SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onselectionof3rdGenerationEngineeringforwate rand
wastewaterratestudy
BACKGROUND:
AshasbeendiscussedwiththeCityCouncilandFin anceAdvisoryCommittee,Citystaffhas
recommendedhavingacomprehensivestudyperformed ofUniversityPark'swaterandwastewater
rates.Thestudywouldencompassissueslikeconse rvationincentives,integrationofwholesaleprice
increasesfromDCPCMUD,allocationofcostsbetween waterandwastewateractivities,structureof
ratesbetweenfixedandvariablecharges,andconsi derationofcustomerclasses.
InJunetheCityissuedarequestforproposalfor thestudyandinvitedthreefirmstorespond:
Economists.com,McLainDecisionSupportSystems,an d3rdGenerationEngineering.Thefirms
submittedproposalsbyAugust3andwereinterviewe dbyFinance,PublicWorks,andUtilityBilling
personnelAugust23,2012.
Allthreefirmshaveimpressivecredentialsandtra ckrecords.Afterdiscussion,theCity
representativeschose3rdGenerationEngineering,b ecauseofthestrengthofthefirm'smethodand
abilitytodevelopandhelpimplementanappropriat eratesolution.Totalcontractcostis$35,715.
MembersoftheFinanceAdvisoryCommitteeandPubli cWorksorUrbanDesignandDevelopment
AdvisoryCommitteehavebeeninvitedtoparticipate atselectedpointsduringthestudyprocess.The
studyresultswillthenbereviewedbythefullcom mitteesandbroughttotheCityCouncilfor
considerationandapproval.Thestudyisprojected totake12weeks.
RECOMMENDATION:
Citystaffrecommendsselectionof3rdGenerationE ngineeringtoperformacomprehensivewater
andwastewaterratestudyfor$35,715.Acopyoft hefirm'sproposalprovidesmoredetailandis
attached.
ATTACHMENTS:
Ratestudyproposal--3rdGenerationEngineering
Page 33 of 104
Page 1
Phone: (972) 387-8784 Fax: (972) 387-8874 www.3rd-gen.com
7920 Belt Line Road, Suite 591
Dallas, TX 75254
Page 34 of 104
Page 2
Phone: (972) 387-8784 Fax: (972) 387-8874 www.3rd-gen.com
Page 35 of 104
Table of Contents
Page
Section 1 Firm and Project Team Profile ……………………………………………………………………. 1
1.1 About 3rd Generation Engineering ………………………………………………….. 1
1.2 About Carolyn Marshall CPA …………………………………………………………… 1
1.3 Project Team Organization ……………………………………………………………… 2
Section 2 Work Plan and Study Scope ……………………………………………………………………….. 4
2.1 Project Understanding ……………………………………………………………………. 4
2.2 Project Approach ……………………………………………………………………………. 4
2.3 Scope of Work ……………………………………………………………………………….. 5
Section 3 Fees and Timing ……………………………………………………………………………………….… 10
3.1 Project Schedule ……………………………………………………………………………. 10
3.2 Proposal Fee ………………………………………………………………………………….. 10
Section 4 Representative Projects and References …………………………………………..………. 11
Appendix:
A. Data Requirements for Study
B. Resumes
C. Company Brochure
Page 36 of 104
1
SECTION 1
Firm and Project Team Profile
3rd Generation Engineering Inc. and Carolyn Marshall, CPA (the 3rd GEN Team) offers the City of
University Park (the City or University Park) a unique set of technical and analytical capabilities. The 3rd
GEN Team offers more than just the requisite skills stated in the City’s Request for Proposals. We offer
first-hand knowledge and insight from completing literally hundreds of financial and management
studies for all types of utilities and municipalities.
1.1 About 3rd Generation Engineering
3rd Generation Engineering is a fully-staffed engineering and consulting firm serving our water and
wastewater, industrial and oil and gas clients from our office in Dallas, Texas since 2008. 3rd Generation
Engineering is staffed with more than ten professionals representing nearly one hundred years of
combined experience in specialized engineering and financial management practices. Our staff consists
of utility rate consultants, professional engineers, staff engineers, technical specialists,
designer/drafters, and administrative support staff. 3rd Generation Engineering’s senior staff members
have worked together, at various employers, for the last ten years.
3rd Generation Engineering offers a complete suite of services ranging from feasibility studies,
conceptual design, financial planning and project delivery support all the way through as-built plans and
start-up of projects. 3rd Generation Engineering provides clients with the utility tariff analysis and
ratemaking, energy procurement support, power system monitoring, arc flash analysis and load
management as well as regulatory assistance needed to operate their assets and business cost
effectively. 3rd Generation Engineering offers its Clients several key services. These services include, but
are not limited to, the following:
• Electrical Engineering
• Project Management
• Application Engineering Services
• Instrumentation and Controls
• Utility Accounting Support
• Financial Planning
• Utility Ratemaking
• Load Management
• Energy Procurement Support
• Regulatory Assistance
1.2 About Carolyn Marshall CPA
In 2001, Carolyn Marshall opened her business as an independent consultant to governmental entities,
concentrating on municipalities. Based on her previous municipal experience, she provides financial and
consulting services, including cost of service and utility rate studies; serving as interim finance director,
when needed; providing staff assistance for cities; as well as providing municipal finance and accounting
training to cities throughout the State of Texas.
Page 37 of 104
2
1.3 Project Team Organization
The following figure presents the 3rd GEN Team organization for the City’s water and wastewater rate
study.
3rd GEN Team members provide the maximum benefit and experience level for the City’s water and
wastewater rate study. When assembling our project team, we selected individuals with specific areas
of expertise to match the potential project requirements and to apply our depth in related areas. In our
opinion, our proposed Project Team, representing over sixty (60) years of combined experience, not
only possess the necessary attributes of experience and qualifications, but have also demonstrated the
project management capabilities to ensure the City a high-level of service and a quality product. For
more detailed resumes on all of the Project Team members, please refer to Appendix B.
Mark Fisher P.E. – Project Director
Mark Fisher is a Professional Engineer and President of 3rd Generation Engineering. He has nearly
twenty (20) years of engineering experience in project management, design, bidding and construction
phase services of electrical and instrumentation systems for multiple water, wastewater, oil, gas and
industrial projects throughout the United States. As Project Director he will be available for utility
engineering advice related to the rate study as well as quality control of deliverables.
Dan Lanning – Project Manager/Rate Analyst
Dan Lanning applies his thirty (30) years of domestic and international accounting and financial analy sis
experience in utility financial and management matters. He has conducted numerous cost of service,
asset valuation, and management studies for both public and private utilities. These studies have been
prepared for investor owned and public utilities with annual revenues ranging from $10,000 to over
City of University Park
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
Daniel Lanning
Carolyn Marshall CPA
RATE MODELING
Carolyn Marshall CPA
PROJECT MANAGER
Daniel Lanning – 3rd GEN
SOFTWARE SPECIALIST
Adam Butt– 3rd GEN
PROJECT DIRECTOR
Mark Fisher P.E. – 3rd GEN
Page 38 of 104
3
$250 million. Dan’s background in utility accounting, finance and ratemaking sweeps a wide range of
professional positions from working for a large electric, gas and steam utility (accounting and auditing)
to a utility regulator to a utility consultant and expert witness. As Project Manager he will be principal
contact for the City and directly responsible for seeing that the project tasks are completed on-time with
professional results. He will also be the lead consultant in preparing an equitable cost distribution to
customer classes and recommending the right rate structure for the City’s water and wastewater utility.
Carolyn Marshall CPA – Rate and Financial Analyst
Carolyn Marshall is owner of Carolyn M Marshall, CPA, with thirty (30) years of experience as an
Accounting/Financial professional. Twenty-three (23) of those years were spent in water and sewer
utilities and municipal finance. She has worked for municipal governments as a Director of Finance
(Watauga) as well as a Senior Utility Rate Analyst (Fort Worth). As a 3rd GEN Team member, she will
bring her considerable utility accounting and rate expertise to develop a sustainable revenue
requirement and financial plan for the City’s water and wastewater utility.
Adam Butt – Software Specialist
Adam Butt is a software and networking engineer with a B.S. in Computer Science and Software
Engineering from the University of Texas at Dallas. He has nearly ten (10) years of software and
networking experience. Adam will be available to advise and assist the 3rd GEN Team in determining
the capability of the City’s utility billing system software to adapt to alternative rate structures
investigated in the rate study.
Page 39 of 104
4
Section 2
Work Plan and Study Scope
2.1 Project Understanding
The City of University Park is seeking a qualified consultant to prepare a Water and Wastewater Rate
Study. University Park is interested in determining the suitability of its current water and wastewater
rates, i.e., whether or not they reflect current costs and provide the correct price signals to the
customer. The purpose of this study is to:
• Compare the water and wastewater existing rate revenue with the utilities' cost to serve its
customers. This comparison should be made after the consultant develops revenue
requirements for water and wastewater that take into consideration anticipated increase in
Dallas County Park Cities Municipal Utility District (DCPCMUD) rates, ongoing capital
improvement plans, changes in operating requirements, and changes in water supply and
demand.
• Analyze the projected revenue requirements to determine whether or not rate revenue
equitably distributes costs to each class of customer in accordance with generally accepted
principles for water and wastewater rate studies.
• Develop and evaluate rate design alternatives and prepare an implementation strategy for the
rate structure that best meets University Park’s needs.
• Provide a means for City staff to update rates in-house for the next five years using the structure
and method established by the study.
Note: Scope issues that were specifically called out in the City’s RFP are highlighted in italics throughout
this proposal.
2.2 Project Approach
The 3rd GEN Team will develop water rates using the base-extra capacity method as set forth in the
American Water Works Association (AWWA) Principles of Water Rates, Fees, and Charges manual M-1.
Each task of the study will be prepared using generally accepted ratemaking guidelines within the water
and wastewater industry. In compiling water rates, the 3rd GEN Team will use the AWWA Manual M-1
as a guide. For wastewater rates and charges, the 3rd GEN Team will rely on the Water Environmental
Federation (WEF) manual on Financing Charges for Wastewater Systems as a guide.
3rd GEN Team members recognize the City of University Park’s need to provide cost-effective service
equitably to all customers. One issue of particular importance for University Park is equitably balancing
the needs/demands of its single largest customer, SMU, with other customer’s served by the water and
wastewater utilities. Our proposed team is sensitive to the importance of equity and fairness in the
determination of the costs of service for water and wastewater utilities. This study will focus on issues
that may influence both the costs of servicing the city’s customer base and the manner in which those
costs are recovered through rates and charges.
Page 40 of 104
5
To ensure that the study of both the city’s water and wastewater rate schedules satisfies its objectives,
the 3rd GEN Team will use a fundamental approach to rate making that recognizes several basic
principles. These principles include the need for:
• Adherence to rate-making objectives of equity, revenue adequacy, economic efficiency,
administrative simplicity, and compliance with legal constraints
• Consideration of and allowance for all regulatory and financial requirements related to
operations, capital improvements, and sources of funds
• Recognition of local conditions to ensure the prope r implementation and public acceptability of
any recommendation
• Recognition of specific requirements established in contracts with DCPCMUD
• Close project coordination with the city and designated staff
Our scope of services is presented as a sequence of subtasks. Many tasks will be performed
concurrently, because either the information needed to accomplish our analysis will overlap or certain
tasks may be independent of other tasks. This approach will ensure that the study is completed
expeditiously.
Several key events included in this work plan are workshops. It is important to identify the workshop
purpose and the stakeholders expected in each workshop. We will conduct a workshop at the
conclusion of the revenue requirement and rate design tasks to discuss the draft results of the task as
well as scope of the next task.
Finally, the main deliverables from this project include a water and wastewater rate/ financial planning
model and a report. The model will be a means for City staff to update rates in-house over the next five
years. In addition, we will provide copies of AWWA M-1 and WEF Financing Charges for Wastewater
Systems manuals for use as a reference guide during future utility rate updates prepared by City staff.
Following delivery of the rate models and the report for water and wastewater, at staff’s request, the
3rd GEN Team will present its findings to the City Council.
2.3 Scope of Work
The scope of work is presented below as Tasks 1 through 5. Since the basic ratemaking concept is the
same for both water and wastewater, the discussions of these tasks apply to both systems. However,
there are issues that need to be addressed separately between water and wastewater in several of the
tasks. Those issues are discussed in the scope and are priced separately for each utility in the Timing
and Fee section of this proposal.
Task 1 Initial Kick-off Meeting
This first task will develop a baseline understanding of the water and wastewater utilities current
financial condition using certain vital documents we will request. A sample list of documents and
material needed is provided in Appendix A of this proposal.
Page 41 of 104
6
Once the City provides 3rd GEN Team with key evaluation data, we will schedule the kick-off meeting.
We will use this meeting to discuss questions or issues arising from this initial assessment. At this
meeting, we will also review the roles and responsibilities of various parties to facilitate coordinat ion
throughout the project, discuss deliverable product, review procedures (who reports should be sent to,
how many copies, how preliminary findings should be marked, etc.), and to review the proposed project
schedule for the project and identify any conflicts.
Task 2 Determination of Revenue Requirements
Fundamental to the rate development process is determining revenues that must be recovered through
the water and wastewater rates.
Task 2a Data Evaluation
During this task we will begin evaluating the data provided in Task 1 and when necessary, contact City
staff to ask questions and confirm our understanding of the data.
This evaluation will also include an assessment of the funding sources for any proposed capital
improvements, including but not limited to System Development/Impact Fee funding, pay-as-you-go
funding as well as any other traditional capital financing mechanisms.
Task 2b Water/Wastewater Cost Separation
In this task the 3rd GEN Team will develop cost allocations used to distribute shared annual costs
between the water and wastewater utilities. Examples of costs that could be shared and should be
separated include the following:
• Management and staff payroll
• Interdepartmental transfers
• Customer billing and accounting
• Management information systems
Task 2c Water and Wastewater Revenue Requirement Determination (Separate Task for Water
and Wastewater)
We will review and discuss the City’s planned Capital Improvement Program (CIP) as well as its
borrowing policies, cash management procedures and policies, cash flow, billing procedures, and
minimum cash balance requirements affecting operations.
Using historic and budget expenses, the 3rd GEN Team will develop projected expenses for the water and
wastewater utilities for a five-year period. The projections will include all operating costs, pay-as-you-go
capital costs, and, if appropriate, pro forma debt service needed to support the utilities’ CIP. We may
suggest developing various new funds or alternative administration of existing funds that will ensure
positive cash balances.
Page 42 of 104
7
This element of the rate study will be created separately between water and wastewater on a computer
model. This model will include user input variables allowing the user to revise projected increases in
operating costs, the mix of pro forma debt (if deemed appropriate) and pay-as-you-go financing, and
fund balance requirements, among others.
The 3rd GEN Team will schedule a workshop for the City presenting the projected revenue requirements
and variables. Based on the City’s review we will revise the projections as necessary, and add or remove
variables that will automatically revise the water and/or the wastewater computer model projections.
Based on the projected revenues from fees, service charges, and other miscellaneous sources and the
annual revenue requirements, we will calculate the remaining revenues required from both water and
wastewater customers. The 3rd GEN Team will deduct these revenues from the total water and
wastewater revenue requirements to determine the rate revenues required.
Task 3 Cost of Service Analysis
Task 3a Customer Classification and Water Use (Separate Task for Water and Wastewater)
The 3rd GEN Team will review and evaluate historic data on water purchases and consumption
(including peak demands), wastewater volumes and pollutant loadings. Analyzing the data, we will
determine historic annual trends in water use and wastewater discharge. We will also evaluate sales
data in terms of allocations across customer types and to determine where breaks in consumption
occur. Recent water use data will be viewed on a monthly basis to determine seasonal variations. To
facilitate evaluation and minimize costs, we assume that such data will be provided to us in machine-
readable form.
For rate purposes, customers are classified into groups having similar water use and wastewater
characteristics. Because of its size compared to other classes of customers in University Park, SMU
usage/discharge patterns will be evaluated separately. Generally, the important water use
characteristics include factors such as average and peak demands (maximum day and peak hour). For
wastewater customers, the most relevant characteristics are related to the strength of the waste (BOD,
TSS, and in some cases nitrogen or other parameters), with lesser emphasis on peak uses.
Key data required to classify customers and develop new water and wastewater rates is the water-
billing database. The 3rd GEN Team will review the contents of the City’s database with appropriate
personnel. We will perform a billing analysis to determine if further classifications are necessary. If a
further breakdown of classifications appears to be warranted, we will prepare an interim memo for the
City providing the recommended classifications and the methods to reclassify customers.
Task 3b Cost Allocation (Separate Task for Water and Wastewater)
To the extent of what the City’s cost accounting system allows and consistent with M-1 and other
applicable guidance documents, the 3rd GEN Team will functionalize costs for water and wastewater
service. This step will also involve considerable assistance from the City staff in this process. The
functionalization of costs will allow the allocatio n of costs to specific customer classes
Page 43 of 104
8
Based on customer classifications (existing or recommended revised classifications), we will allocate the
functionalized revenue requirements to various customer classes to determine each customer class’
equitable share of costs.
Task 4 Rate Design/Alternative Rate Structures (Separate Task for Water and Wastewater)
The 3rd GEN Team will analyze several alternative water and wastewater rate structures. Included will
be alternatives such as: a fixed service charge with no allowance, uniform rates by class, various block
rate structures, seasonal rate alternatives to the City’s current seasonal rate structures, high strength
surcharges for wastewater, and various conservation rate alternatives. The rate alternatives will be
discussed with the City and analyzed in terms of the following objectives.
• All water and wastewater rate alternatives will be considered in light of their ability to provide
adequate and stable revenues. To meet revenue requirements under emergencies, we will also
analyze various fund options that could be used to provide adequate revenues in these cases for
the Water and Wastewater Departments.
• All water and wastewater rate structure alternatives will be considered in light of existing rate
law or regulation (federal, state, and local, as applicable) as well as past and potential litigation.
While municipalities have a fair degree of latitude in rate setting, rates cannot be unreasonably
discriminatory.
• All water and wastewater rate structure alternatives will be considered in light of
implementation. We will analyze any additional efforts that may be required to implement new
rates, and quantify where these efforts will be needed. This will include consideration of the
City’s billing software capabilities.
• All water and wastewater rate alternatives will be considered in light of their ability to
encourage water conservation. By contrast, alternative rate structures and fees will be explored
that could penalize customer’s continued excessive water use, especially during drought
conditions.
Based on the analysis of rate structure alternatives and the discussions with the City, we will schedule
and prepare for a workshop on water and wastewater rate structure alternatives. During this workshop
we will discuss the alternatives considered and the impacts these alternatives will have on each class of
customer. This includes the criteria (objectives) used to evaluate the alternatives, implementation
concerns, and probable customer revenue impacts. In the workshop we will present and discuss
recommended water and wastewater rate structures.
As part of our water and wastewater alternative rate structure analysis, we will analyze various
minimum and service charges the City might adopt and the amount of revenue to be gleaned from these
charges, i.e., determine a reasonable mix of fixed fee revenue and variable consumption revenue. These
options will include charges varying by customer meter size as well as charges that vary with water
consumption and customer classification.
The recommended rate structures will be compared to water and wastewater rates charged by at least
five other cities (Dallas, Highland Park, Addison, Plano, and Richardson). The comparisons will be
Page 44 of 104
9
developed using the typical monthly/annual metered consumption of University Park residential
customers so it will reflect a true apples to apples comparison.
Task 5 Develop Financial/Rate Model and Report
Task 5a Financial/Rate Model
The 3rd GEN Team will develop a rate and financial spreadsheet model for the water and wastewater
utility systems. We will develop the model in sections throughout the course of the study. Key modules
will include revenue requirements, capital project financing, future revenue forecasting, cost allocations
to various water and wastewater functional components and to customer classes, and recommended
rate designs. By constantly developing the model, its development will parallel the course of the study.
At the conclusion of the study we propose to provide a copy of the model to the City of University Park
along with up to 6 hours of on-site training and instruction in each model’s use.
Task 5b Reports and Presentations
We will prepare a draft project report and submit it to City staff for review. This report will detail our
investigations and findings. After the City staff has reviewed and commented on the draft report, the 3rd
GEN Team will incorporate staff edits to the report and deliver the water and wastewater rates study
final report within ten days. We will submit ten bound copies and one electronic copy in Microsoft
Word format on a CD. We will include one copy of each rate model in Microsoft Excel format, which will
be suitable for annual updates by City staff.
The 3rd GEN Team will also meet with other City officials to present study findings. At this meeting, we
expect to jointly present the findings with members of the City Staff.
Page 45 of 104
10
SECTION 3
Project Timing and Fees
3.1 Project Schedule
The following figure is a depiction of the project schedule in detail, including elapsed time by task and
project deliverables.
Duration
1 Day
1 Day
7 Days
1 Day
7 Days
1 Day
Key:
Start Date
End Date
Interim Work Shops
Days Dedicated to Task
a: Review of Vital
Documents 10 Days
a: Rate Design &
Alternative Rate
Structures
12 Days
Ta
s
k
1
Ta
s
k
4
Workshop
a: Customer
Classification
Workshop
Ta
s
k
2
Ta
s
k
3
b: Cost Allocation
Week 5
10/17/2012
Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10 Week 11 Key Dates
8/23/2012
9/5/2012
Study Presentation
b: Water/Waste
Water Cost
10/31/2012
9/25/2012
Ta
s
k
5
a: Data Evaluation
Week 6
Finalize Rate Model
and Report
7 Days
6 Days
12 Days
Subtask
Notice to Proceed
Kick-off Meeting
Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4
We estimate that eleven weeks (from September 1, 2012 through October 31, 2012) will be required to
complete this engagement, dependent upon the receipt of any requested information, the availability of
City Staff for meetings and interviews, and comments on the draft report.
3.2 Proposal Fee
3rd Generation Engineering invoices its clients monthly for actual services performed plus out-of-pocket
expenses incurred at cost. Payment is due within thirty days of the invoice date. 3rd Generation
Engineering proposes a not-to-exceed project cost of $35,715 for this engagement. Total fees shall not
exceed this amount without the written approval of the City of University Park. Additional professional
services will be provided using 3rd Generation Engineering’s standard hourly rates.
This proposal and proposal fee is valid for a period of one hundred twenty (120) days from the
date of receipt of the proposal by the City.
Page 46 of 104
11
SECTION 4
Representative Projects and References
Principal members of the 3rd GEN Team have a solid history of working with municipal utilities and with
the bond underwriters on the financial side of these public entities. We have consistently delivered our
services with a level of integrity, commitment, and independence that has earned the trust of those we
serve.
We encourage the City of University Park to contact the following representative professional
references who can speak to our abilities and performance. The references listed correspond to the
recent experience presented in this section.
Carolyn Marshall CPA
1. City of Canyon, Texas – Utility Rate Study. The City of Canyon, a city in the Panhandle of Texas
near Amarillo with a population of approximately 14 ,000 citizens, is the home of West Texas A
M University with an enrollment of nearly 8,000 students. This university has a significant
impact on the operations of the City, especially utility operations as the City’s planning and rate
study had to consider the enrollment and usage patterns of the university. Contact: Chris
Sharp, Assistant City Manager/Finance Director, 301 16th Street, Canyon, TX 79015; Phone
(806) 655-5003 Fax (806)-655-5044; csharp@canyontx.com.
2. Town of Westlake, Texas - Utility Rate Study. The Town of Westlake is a community in Tarrant
and Denton counties near the Alliance Airport. The Town is beginning to see commercial
growth; however, the focus of the utility is providing services for the very large residential lots
and homes that result in higher than normal average annual water usage. The rate study
prepared by Ms. Marshall needed to develop some balance in the desires of the residents with
the City’s conservation efforts. Contacts: (1) Jarrod Greenwood, Public Works Director, 3
Village Circle, Suite 202, Westlake, Texas 76262; Phone (817) 490-5717
jgreenwood@westlake-tx.org; or (2) Debbie Piper, Finance Director; Phone (817) 490-5712
Fax (817) 530-1812; dpiper@westlake-tx.org.
3. City of Watauga, Texas – Utility Rate Study. The City of Watauga is a community in Tarrant
County that has experienced significant commercial growth since 2000. The city has a
population of approximately 24,000. Watauga has a significant percentage of rental property
and senior utility customers. Establishing fair and equitable utility rates was a challenge when
considering the ability to pay in the rate study. Contact: Sandra Morgan, Director of Finance
and Administration, , 7105 Whitley Road, Watauga, Texas 76148; Phone (817) 514-5822 Fax
(817) 281-1991; smorgan@cowtx.org.
Page 47 of 104
12
3rd Generation Engineering and Carolyn Marshall CPA
4. Dan Lanning; Project Manager/Carolyn Marshall; Rate Analyst - Wholesale Water Contract
Negotiations for the City of Fort Worth Water Department (FWWD). Mr. Lanning was the
project manager for a team of consultants that assisted FWWD in developing a new uniform
wholesale water contract for over thirty wholesale customers, evaluating the rate methodology
and terms and conditions as well as making recommendations. The existing contract was set to
expire at the end of calendar year 2010. The wholesale customer base represents a substantial
portion of FWWD water service revenues. The new uniform wholesale water contract was
signed by the wholesale customers and approved by Fort Worth City Council. Contact: Robert
"Skipper" Shook, Senior Rate Analyst, Fort Worth Water Department, 1000 Throckmorton St,
Ft Worth, TX 76102-6311; Robert.Shook@fortworthgov.org; Phone (817) 392-8402, Fax (817)
392-8195
3rd Generation Engineering
5. Dan Lanning; Expert Witness - Bank of New York Mellon versus Jefferson County, Alabama, et
al., in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama, Case Number CV 2009-02318. Deposed as
an Expert Witness regarding reasonableness of sewer rates and appropriate sewer design
alternatives on behalf of the Bank of New York Mellon (the Trust) by its attorneys – Waller
Lansden Dortch & Davis, LLP. Contact: Ryan K. Cochran, Attorney at Law -Waller Lansden
Dortch & Davis, LLP, 511 Union St. Suite 2700, Nashville, TN 37219; Phone (615) 850-8778 Fax
(615) 244-6804; ryan.cochran@wallerlaw.com
Page 48 of 104
APPENDIX A
Sample List of 3rd GEN Data Needs for Water and Wastewater Rate Study
• Budget data on projected expenses, projected operating expenses
• Usage, flow and strength data recorded by the City in machine-readable form
• Previous utility cost of service studies prepared by and/or for the City
• Proposed capital improvements, including when new contracts are expected to start and the
cost of improvements
• Management and staff payroll
• Interdepartmental transfers
• Customer billing and accounting
• Customer billing output – monthly use by meter size, number of meters by size, etc. From this
database, 3RD GEN expects to collect water use by customer classification, meter size and
consumption blocks.
• Statement of billing system capabilities (could be developed through interviews with City staff or
City’s IT consultant)
• DCPCMUD Contracts and three years historical invoices
Page 49 of 104
AGENDAMEMO
(9/18/2012AGENDA)
TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil
FROM:LizSpector,CitySecretary
SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onacontractforFoodEstablishmentInspectionsan d
EnvironmentalHealthServiceswithDallasCountyHe althandHumanServices
(DCHHS)forFY2013
BACKGROUND:
EachfiscalyearthecitymustrenewtheInterlocal AgreementwithDCHHSforfoodestablishment
inspectionservicesandotherenvironmentalhealth services.TheagreementtermisOctober1,2012
throughSeptember30,2013.
DCHHSprovidestwostandardinspectionsperfoodse rviceestablishmentannually.Additional
inspectionsareperformedasdeemednecessarybyth ecounty.Theseinspectionsincludeexamination
offoodandfoodprotection,personnel,foodequipm entandutensils,watersource,sewage,plumbing,
toiletandhand-washingfacilities,garbageandre fusedisposal,insect,rodentandanimalcontrol,
floors,walls,ceiling,lights,ventilationandoth eroperationsforallestablishmentsinthecityth at
vendfoodproducts.Thisincludesallcateringtru ckslicensedtooperateinthecity.Thereare150
permittedfoodestablishments(includingallSMUan dHPISDlocations)andcateringtruckscurrently
operatinginUniversityPark.
DCHHSprovidesCitystaffwithquarterlyinspection reportsandapprovaltoissuehealthpermits.
Thecostofthisannualcontractis$150perestabl ishmentfortwoinspectionswithanadditional
chargeof$75foranysubsequentinspections.The amountpaidbythecityfortheseservicesinthe
previousfiscalyearwas$16,850andanequivalent chargeisexpectedforthecurrentyear.
Thiscontractalsoprovidesotherenvironmentalhea lthservicestobeprovideduponwrittenrequest
suchasvectorand/ormosquitocontrolcomplaints.ItalsoprovidestheCitytheoptiontoparticipat e
intheCounty'semergencyaerialmosquitospraying planuponwrittennotice.TheCitywillbe
requiredtopayitsproportionedshareofthecost baseduponthenumberofacrestobesprayed
multipliedbytheper-acresprayingcost.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staffrecommendsapprovalofthecontractrenewal.
FUNDINGSOURCE:
01-02-3060
ATTACHMENTS:
FY13FoodEstablishmentSvcs.Agmt.
Page 50 of 104
Page 51 of 104
Page 52 of 104
Page 53 of 104
Page 54 of 104
Page 55 of 104
AGENDAMEMO
(9/18/2012AGENDA)
TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil
FROM:LizSpector,CitySecretary
SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onapprovalofminutesoftheSeptember4,2012Cit y
CouncilMeeting
BACKGROUND:
MinutesareincludedfortheCouncil'sreview.
ATTACHMENTS:
2012.09.04CCMtgMin
Page 56 of 104
0,187(6
$*(1'$
&,7<&281&,/0((7,1*
&,7<2)81,9(56,7<3$5.7(;$6
&281&,/&+$0%(5±&,7<+$//
78(6'$<6(37(0%(5 30
4:00 - 4:30 P.M. WORK SESSION FOR AGENDA REVIEW: THE COUNCIL MET IN OPEN
WORK SESSION TO RECEIVE AGENDA ITEM BRIEFINGS FROM STAFF. NO
ACTION WAS TAKEN. COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM, 2ND FLOOR, CITY HALL.
7KH&RXQFLOPHWLQRSHQZRUNVHVVLRQWRUHFHLYHDJHQGDLWHPEULHILQJVIURPVWDII3UHVHQWZHUH
0D\RU'DYLV0D\RU3UR7HP&ODUNDQG&RXQFLOPHPEHUV%HJHUW0RRUHDQG6WHZDUW
&KLHIRI3ROLFH*DU\$GDPVEULHIHGWKH&RXQFLODERXWWZRFRQVHQWDJHQGDLWHPV+HVDLG608
UHTXHVWVWRWHPSRUDULO\FORVHDOOODQHVRI+LOOFUHVWEHWZHHQ8QLYHUVLW\DQG0RFNLQJELUGGXULQJ
WKHLUKRPHFRPLQJSDUDGHRQ6DWXUGD\2FWREHUIURPDPWR SP&KLHI$GDPV
VWDWHGWKH&RXQFLODSSURYHGFORVLQJ+LOOFUHVWIRUWKHPRVWUHFHQWKRPHFRPLQJSDUDGHDQGQR
VLJQLILFDQWSUREOHPVUHVXOWHG&KLHI$GDPVPHQWLRQHGWKDWKHZRXOGOLNHWRKDYHRQHSROLFHXQLW
SUHVHQWGXULQJWKHFORVXUH+HDOVRVWDWHGWKH'LUHFWRURI3XEOLF:RUNVKDVUHTXHVWHGWUDIILF
EDUULFDGHVEHHUHFWHGDWFHUWDLQORFDWLRQVGXULQJWKHVWUHHWFORVXUH
&KLHI$GDPVDOVRGLVFXVVHGDUHTXHVWIURPDQ608VRURULW\WRFRQGXFWDNIXQGUDLVLQJIXQUXQ
DOVRRQ2FWREHU+HVWDWHGWKHPDMRULW\RIWKHUDFHZLOOEH UXQRQFDPSXVEXWLWZLOOLQFOXGH
FHUWDLQUHVLGHQWLDOVWUHHWV+HVDLGVWDIIKDVDSSURYHGWKHUDFHURXWHSURYLGHGE\WKHRUJDQL]HUDQG
KHUHFRPPHQGVDSSURYDORIWKHUHTXHVW
'LUHFWRURI)LQDQFH.HQW$XVWLQUHYLHZHGD)<EXGJHWDPHQGPHQWZLWKWKH&RXQFLO+H
VDLGWKHDPHQGPHQWPRYHVIXQGVWRFRYHUXQIRUHVHHQH[SHQVHVVXFKDVWKHUHYLHZRIWKH<0&$
WUDIILFVWXG\DQGWKHWUDQVFULSWLRQRIDSXEOLFKHDULQJDW%2$UHJDUGLQJWKH/HJDF\+LOOFUHVW
UH]RQLQJUHTXHVW+HVDLGWKHDPRXQWRIWKHEXGJHWDPHQGPHQWLV
6HQLRU1HWZRUN$GPLQLVWUDWRU.HQ,UYLQUHYLHZHGDUHTXHVWWRUHSODFHGLVSDWFKHTXLSPHQWZLWK
WKH&RXQFLO+HVDLGWKHHTXLSPHQWZDVORFDWHGLQWKH3HHN&HQWHUEDFNXSGLVSDWFKVLWHDQGZDVD
SODQQHGUHSODFHPHQWRIHTXLSPHQWWKDWKDVUHDFKHGLWVHVWLPDWHGOLIH+HVDLGWKHFRVWRIWKH
UHSODFHPHQWWRWDOV
'LUHFWRURI3XEOLF:RUNV%XG6PDOOZRRGUHYLHZHGKLVUHTXHVWWRFRQWUDFWZLWK5/*RRGVRQWR
GHYHORSDFRPSUHKHQVLYHVWRUPZDWHUGUDLQDJHPDSUHSRUW+HVDLGWKHFRVWLVLQFOXGHGLQ&DSLWDO
3URMHFWVIXQGLQJDQGLVHVWLPDWHGWRFRVW+HDVNHGW KH&RXQFLOWRDSSURYHWKHSURMHFW
VXEMHFWWRWKHGHOHWLRQRIWKH/LPLWRI/LDELOLW\FODXVHLQWKHFRQWUDFW
0U6PDOOZRRGDOVRUHYLHZHGWKHSURSRVDOWRFRQWUDFWZLWK)UHHVHDQG1LFKROVWRFRQGXFW
K\GUDXOLFPRGHOLQJRIWKHLQFKVDQLWDU\VHZHUWUXQNPDLQWKH &LW\VKDUHVZLWKWKH7RZQRI
+LJKODQG3DUN+HVDLGWKHFRVWRIWKHPRGHOLQJLVDQGZLOOEHVSOLWHTXDOO\ZLWK
+LJKODQG3DUN0U6PDOOZRRGVWDWHG8QLYHUVLW\3DUNZLOOEHWKHDGPLQLVWUDWRURIWKHFRQWUDFW
DQG+LJKODQG3DUNZLOOUHLPEXUVHWKH&LW\IRUWKHLUKDOI
$VVLVWDQW'LUHFWRURI3XEOLF:RUNV-DFRE6SHHUUHYLHZHGWKHDQQXDOUHQHZDORIWKHFRQWUDFWZLWK
'DOODV&RXQW\ZKLFKDOORZV&LW\UHVLGHQWVWRGURSRIIKD]DUGRXVKRXVHKROGZDVWHDW'DOODV
&RXQW\FROOHFWLRQFHQWHUV+HVDLGWKHFRVWRIWKHFRQWUDFWLV
Page 57 of 104
0D\RU'DYLVEULHIO\GLVFXVVHGWKH<0&$3'DPHQGPHQWUHTXHVW+HDVNHG&LW\$WWRUQH\
'LOODUGLIWKH&RXQFLOFRXOGPDNHDPRWLRQRQWKLVLWHPGXULQJWKHPHHWLQJDQG0U'LOODUGVWDWHG
WKH\FRXOG0D\RU'DYLVVDLGKHLVFRQILGHQWDFRPSURPLVHUHODWHGWRWKHVL]HRIWKHIDFLOLW\FDQ
EHPDGH+HDVNHGWKDWHDFK&RXQFLOPHPEHUPDNHDVWDWHPHQWGXU LQJWKHPHHWLQJWKDWLQFOXGHV
WKHLUWKRXJKWVUHJDUGLQJWKH<0&$EXLOGLQJVL]H0D\RU'DYLVVDLGKHKRSHVWKH<0&$ZLOOEH
DEOHWRPRGLI\WKHLUVLWHSODQWRUHGXFHWKHVL]HRIWKHEXLOGLQJ¶VIRRWSULQW+HVWDWHGKHZLOOOHDYH
WKH3'DPHQGPHQWUHTXHVWRSHQIRUWZRPRQWKVWRDOORZWKH<0&$WLPHWRZRUNRQDQHZSODQ
0D\RU'DYLVVWDWHGKHZRXOGDJUHHWROHDYHWKHUHTXHVWRQWKHWDEOHORQJHULIUHTXHVWHGE\WKH<
'LUHFWRURI,QIRUPDWLRQ6HUYLFHV-LP&ULVZHOOUHYLHZHGWKHSURSRVDOWRFRQWUDFWZLWK(QHU*RYWR
SURYLGHDQHZVRIWZDUHIRXQGDWLRQIRUWKH&RPPXQLW\'HYHORSPHQW'HSDUWPHQW+HVDLGVWDII
IURPKLVGHSDUWPHQWDQG&RPPXQLW\'HYHORSPHQWKDYHWKRURXJKO\VWXGLHGHLJKWSURSRVDOV
VXEPLWWHGIRUWKH+LJK7HFK5)3DQGKDYHVHOHFWHGDILQDOLVW0U&ULVZHOOVWDWHGWKDWDOWKRXJK
(QHU*RYZDVQRWWKHORZELGGHUWKHLUSDFNDJHZDVWKHPRVWYLDE OHDQGDEHVWILWIRUWKHQHHGVRI
WKH&RPPXQLW\'HYHORSPHQW'HSDUWPHQW0U&ULVZHOOWROGWKH&RXQFLOVLQFHWKLV5)3LV
FRQVLGHUHG+LJK7HFKWKH&LW\LVQRWUHTXLUHGFRQWUDFWZLWKWKHORZELGGHU+HVWDWHGWKH
SURSRVDOLVLQWKHDPRXQWRI0U&ULVZHOOVDLGWKHUDQJHRIFRVWVSURSRVHGZDVIURP
WR
&RPPXQLW\,QIRUPDWLRQ2IILFHU6WHYH0DFHEULHIO\UHYLHZHGWKHIXQGLQJRIWKH&ROOHJH
6FKRODUVKLS3URJUDP+HVDLGWKHFRPPLWWHHKDVPHWVHYHUDOWLPHVWRGHWHUPLQHWKHEHVWPHWKRG
WRFRQWLQXHWRIXQGWKHSURJUDP&RXQFLOPHPEHU6WHZDUWVDLGVHYHUDOLGHDVZHUHGLVFXVVHGVXFK
DVWKHFRQGXFWLQJRIDQQXDOIXQGUDLVHUVSULYDWHVROLFLWDWLRQVDQGWKHSODFLQJRIDYROXQWDU\
GRQDWLRQRQWKH&LW\¶VPRQWKO\XWLOLW\ELOOV0D\RU3UR7HP&ODUNPHQWLRQHGWKH&LW\KDG
SUHYLRXVO\LQFOXGHGDQRSWLRQDOGRQDWLRQFKHFNER[RQWKHPRQWK O\XWLOLW\ELOOVEXWRQO\ILYHRU
VL[LQGLYLGXDOVKDGRSWHGWRSDUWLFLSDWHWKURXJKRXWWKHSDVWWZR\HDUV0U0DFHVDLGOHWWHUVZHUH
VHQWWRDOOXWLOLW\FOLHQWVLQ-XO\WRLQIRUPUHVLGHQWVRIWKHFRPPLWWHH¶VUHTXHVWWRLQFOXGH
WKHGRQDWLRQRQXWLOLW\ELOOV&LW\$WWRUQH\'LOODUGVDLGWKH&LW\PXVWHQVXUHWKDWWKHXWLOLW\ELOOV
LQFOXGHDQRWLFHWKDWVWDWHVDQ\FROOHFWHGGRQDWLRQVJRWRWKH&LYLF)RXQGDWLRQLIWKLVIXQGLQJ
PHWKRGLVVHOHFWHG
)LQDQFH'LUHFWRU$XVWLQZDONHGWKH&RXQFLOWKURXJKWKHVWHSVUH TXLUHGWRDGRSWWKHEXGJHWWD[
UDWHSD\SODQDQG7056FKDQJHV+HSURYLGHGDGRFXPHQWGHWDLOLQJWKHVWDWHPDQGDWHG
ODQJXDJHUHTXLUHGIRUWKHDGRSWLRQVWREHXVHGLQPDNLQJPRWLRQVGXULQJWKHPHHWLQJ
0D\RU'DYLVFORVHGWKHZRUNVHVVLRQDW SP
7KH&LW\&RXQFLO0HHWLQJZDVFDOOHGLQWRVHVVLRQDW SPLQWKH&RXQFLO&KDPEHUDW&LW\+DOO
3UHVHQWZHUH&RXQFLOPHPEHU6WHZDUW&RXQFLOPHPEHU&ODUN0D\RU'DYLV&RXQFLOPHPEHU0RRUH
DQG&RXQFLOPHPEHU%HJHUW$OVRLQDWWHQGDQFHZHUH&LW\0DQDJHU/LYLQJVWRQDQG&LW\$WWRUQH\
'LOODUG
0D\RU'DYLVDVNHGDQ\%R\6FRXWVSUHVHQWDWWKHPHHWLQJWRFRPH IRUZDUGDQGDVVLVWLQ
OHDGLQJWKH3OHGJHRI$OOHJLDQFH%R\6FRXW0LFKDHO/XNRZLF]PHPEHURI7URRS
I.CALL TO ORDER
$,192&$7,21 &LW\0DQDJHU%RE/LYLQJVWRQ
%3/('*(2)$//(*,$1&( &LW\0DQDJHU%RE/LYLQJVWRQ%R\6FRXWV
Page 58 of 104
FDPHIRUZDUG+HVWDWHGKHZDVDWWKHPHHWLQJLQDQHIIRUWWRHDUQKLV&LWL]HQVKLSLQWKH
&RPPXQLW\PHULWEDGJH
6WDIISUHVHQWLQFOXGHG &RPPXQLW\,QIRUPDWLRQ2IILFHU6WHYH0D FH'LUHFWRURI
,QIRUPDWLRQ6HUYLFHV-LP&ULVZHOO3ROLFH&KLHI*DU\$GDPV'LU HFWRURI&RPPXQLW\
'HYHORSPHQW5REELH&RUGHU'LUHFWRURI3XEOLF:RUNV%XG6PDOOZR RG&LW\6HFUHWDU\/L]
6SHFWRU&KLHI3ODQQLQJ2IILFLDO+DUU\3HUVDXG)LUH&KLHI5DQG \+RZHOO'LUHFWRURI
+XPDQ5HVRXUFHV/XDQQH+DQIRUG,QIUDVWUXFWXUH0DLQWHQDQFHHPSOR\HH6DPP\&XUULH
'LUHFWRURI)LQDQFH.HQW$XVWLQ'LUHFWRURI3DUNV*HUU\%UDGOH\DQG$VVLVWDQW'LUHFWRURI
3XEOLF:RUNV-DFRE6SHHU
Hillcrest Ave. will be closed to all through traffic from University Blvd. to Mockingbird
Ln. during the SMU homecoming parade Saturday, October 27, 2012, from 10 a.m. until
12:30 p.m.
SMU Sorority Kappa Alpha Theta will conduct a 5k fun run, primarily on the campus of
SMU but to include certain residential streets Saturday, October 27, from 7:30 a.m. to 9:30
a.m.
ORDINANCE NO. 12/23
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS, AMENDING
THE 2011-2012 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET, ORDINANCE NO. 11-20, TO
APPROPRIATE $54,560 FROM THE GENERAL FUND UNRESERVED FUND
BALANCE BY INCREASING EXPENDITURES $54,560; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
This is a planned replacement of computer-related equipment in the backup dispatch
center. Funds in the amount of $58,231.70 are available in the FY2012 Capital Projects
budget.
This will provide consent to contract with R.L. Goodson Consulting Engineers for $200,500
&,1752'8&7,212)&281&,/ 0D\RU:5LFKDUG'DYLV
',1752'8&7,212)67$)) &LW\0DQDJHU%RE/LYLQJVWRQ
II.CONSENT AGENDA
$&216,'(5$1'$&7 RQUHTXHVWIURP608WRWHPSRUDULO\FORVH+LOOFUHVW$YHIURP
8QLYHUVLW\%OYGWR0RFNLQ JELUG/QGXULQJWKHLU+RPHFRPLQJSDUDGH
%&216,'(5$1'$&7 RQDUHTXHVWE\608.DSSD$OSKD7KHWD6RURULW\WRFRQGXFWN
UDFHRQFHUWDLQFLW\VWUHHWV
&&216,'(5$1'$&7 RQRUGLQDQFHDPHQGLQJ)<EXGJHW
'&216,'(5$1'$&7 RQWKHSXUFKDVHRIUHSODFHPHQWHTXLSPHQWIRUEDFNXSGLVSDWFK
FHQWHU
(&216,'(5$1'$&7 RQDSURSRVDOIURP5/*RRGVRQ&RQVXOWLQJ(QJLQHHUVWRGHYHORS
DFRPSUHKHQVLYHVWRUPZDWHUGUDLQDJHPDSUHSRUW
Page 59 of 104
to develop a detailed stormwater collection system map. Funding for the work is available
from the Utility Fund (Stormwater Budget).
Approval authorizes a contract in the amount of $65,000 with Freese and Nichols,
engineering consultants, to develop a hydraulic model of the 30-inch main shared with the
Town of Highland Park to provide insight into what capital improvements and/or
maintenance activities may be necessary to accomplish goals identified in the Interlocal
Areement. The Town of Highland Park will reimburse the City of University Park for it
share of the engineering costs.
This resolution authorizes the City Manager to execute the annual Interlocal Agreement
with Dallas County to coordinate a Countywide Household Hazardous Waste Disposal
Program for $25,000. Funds are allocated in the FY2013 Sanitation Division budget.
RESOLUTION NO. 12-12
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY
PARK, TEXAS, APPROVING A HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH DALLAS COUNTY AND AUTHORIZING
THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
&RXQFLOPHPEHU%HJHUWPDGHDPRWLRQWRDSSURYHWKH&RQVHQW$JHQGDVXEMHFWWRWKHGHOHWLRQRI
WKH/LPLWRI/LDEOLW\FODXVHLQWKH5/*RRGVRQFRQWUDFW&RXQFLOPHPEHU6WHZDUWVHFRQGHGDQG
WKHPRWLRQFDUULHGXQDQLPRXVO\
0D\RU'DYLVDGGUHVVHGWKHPHHWLQJDWWHQGHHVUHJDUGLQJWKH<0&$UHTXHVWWRDPHQGWKHLU
3'+HVDLGDPDMRUFRPSURPLVHLVQHFHVVDU\+HVWDWHGWKHUHLVDJUHDWHTXLW\RQWKHSDUW
RIWKH<0&$WKDWKDVVHUYHGDUHDUHVLGHQWVIRU\HDUVDQGJU HDWHTXLW\RQWKHSDUWRI
KRPHRZQHUVLQWKHQHLJKERUKRRGVXUURXQGLQJWKH<0&$+HDVNHGHDFKPHPEHURI
&RXQFLOWRVWDWHKRZWKH\ZDQWWKLVPDWWHUDGGUHVVHGVSHFLILFDOO\UHODWHGWRWKHVTXDUH
IRRWDJHWKH\ZDQWDOORFDWHGWRWKH<0&$DQGDQ\RWKHUFRQGLWLRQV
0D\RU3UR7HP&ODUNDGGUHVVHGWKH&RXQFLO+HVDLGWKLVKDVEHHQDQH[WUHPHO\GLIILFXOW
LVVXHWRGHFLGH+HVWDWHGKHKDVUHFHLYHGPXFKFRUUHVSRQGHQFHERWKIURPUHVLGHQWV
FRQFHUQHGDERXWQHJDWLYHDIIHFWVRIWKHSURSRVDODQGIURPUHVLGHQWVXUJLQJWKH&RXQFLOWR
DSSURYHWKHUHTXHVWDVSUHVHQWHG+HVDLGWKH<0&$LVDQHVVHQWLDOSDUWRIWKH&LW\DQGKH
ZDQWVWRHQVXUHLWFRQWLQXHVWRIORXULVK+HVDLGWKH<KDVHYROYHGIURPD\RXWKRULHQWHG
)&216,'(5$1'$&7 RQDSURSRVDOIURP)UHHVH 1LFKROVWRFRQGXFWK\GUDXOLF
PRGHOLQJRIWKH8QLYHUVLW\3DUN+LJKODQG3DUNVKDUHGVDQLWDU\VHZHUWUXQNPDLQ
*&216,'(5$1'$&7 RQDUHVROXWLRQDSSURYLQJDQLQWHUORFDODJUHHPHQWZLWK'DOODV
&RXQW\IRUSDUWLFLSDWLRQLQWKHLU+RXVHKROG+D]DUGRXV:DVWHSURJUDP
+&216,'(5$1'$&7 RQPLQXWHVRIWKH$XJXVW&LW \&RXQFLO0HHWLQJ
III.MAIN AGENDA
$&216,'(5$1'$&7 RQDUHTXHVWE\WKH3DUN&LWLHV<0&$WRDPHQG3ODQQHG
'HYHORSPHQW'LVWULFW3'WRGHPROLVKWKHH[LVWLQJVWUXFWXUHDQGUHGHYHORSDDFU H
WUDFWPRUHRUOHVVZLWKDQHZVTIWIDFLOLW \DQGDEHORZJUDGHSDUNLQJJDUDJH
Page 60 of 104
VSDFHWRDQDGXOWDQGIDPLO\ILWQHVVIDFLOLW\ZLWKLQDGHTXDWHSDUNLQJ+HVDLGDOWKRXJKWKH
<0&$¶VSURSRVHGVLWHSODQLQFOXGHVWKHDGGLWLRQRIWKHVSDF HXQGHUJURXQGSDUNLQJ
JDUDJHLWDOVRQHDUO\GRXEOHVWKHVL]HRIWKHH[LVWLQJIDFLOLW\+HVDLGDVNLQJWKH
QHLJKERUKRRGWRDEVRUEDFRPPHUFLDOIDFLOLW\PRUHWKDQGRXEOHWKHVL]HRIWKHH[LVWLQJ
IDFLOLW\LVKDUPIXO0D\RU3UR7HP&ODUNUHTXHVWHGWKH<0&$UHGXFHWKHLUUHTXHVWHG
EXLOGLQJVL]HE\DQGEULQJDUHYLVHGVLWHSODQEDFNIRUWKH &RXQFLO¶VUHYLHZ+HPRYHG
WRDFFHSWWKHUHTXHVWZLWKDVTXDUHIRRWIDFLOLW\DQGEHORZJUDGHSDUNLQJORWVXEMHFW
WRFRQGLWLRQVWREHZRUNHGRXWZLWK&LW\VWDIIDQG<0&$UHSUHVHQWDWLYHV
&RXQFLOPHPEHU6WHZDUWVWDWHGKHLVLPSUHVVHGZLWKWKHSURIHVVLRQDOLVPDQGFRXUWHV\
VKRZQE\<0&$UHSUHVHQWDWLYHVDQGFLWL]HQVDOLNH+HVDLGWKLVLVDYHU\KDUGGHFLVLRQDV
KHKDVOLYHGLQ8QLYHUVLW\3DUNIRURYHU\HDUVDQGJUHZXSXVLQJWKH<0&$0U
6WHZDUWVDLGWKHUHKDVEHHQDORWRIGDWDDQGVWXGLHVVXEPLWWHGVKRZLQJWKHH[LVWLQJ
LQIUDVWUXFWXUHFDQVXSSRUWWKHUHTXHVWHGVL]HRIWKHIDFLOLW\EXWKHVD\VLWZLOOSODFHKDUGVKLS
RQWKHQHLJKERUKRRGE\LQFUHDVLQJWUDIILF0U6WHZDUWVDLGKHZRXOGOLNHWKH<0&$WR
SUHVHQWDVLWHSODQZLWKDVTXDUHIRRWIDFLOLW\WKDWZLO OILWZLWKLQWKHSURSHUW\
&RXQFLOPHPEHU%HJHUWSUDLVHG<0&$UHSUHVHQWDWLYHVIRUWKHLUSURIHVVLRQDOLVPDQG
DWWHQWLRQWRGHWDLO+HDOVRWKDQNHGWKHUHVLGHQWVIRUUHPDLQLQJSURIHVVLRQDOLQWKHVH
GHDOLQJVHYHQWKRXJKWKH\PD\WKLQNWKHLUKRPHVDUHEHLQJWKUHDWHQHG0U%HJHUWVDLGKH
WRRIHHOVWKHVLWHSODQVXEPLWWHGE\WKH<0&$LQFOXGHVDEXLOGLQJWKDWLVWRRODUJH+H
DJUHHVZLWK0D\RU3UR7HP&ODUN¶VVXJJHVWHGVL]HRIVI0U%HJHUWDOVRVDLGWKH
XQGHUJURXQGSDUNLQJJDUDJHLVDQDEVROXWHQHFHVVLW\DQGKHHQFRXUDJHGWKH<0&$WRZRUN
WRVXEPLWSODQVZLWKDVPDOOHUIRRWSULQW
&RXQFLOPHPEHU0RRUHVDLGZRUNLQJWKURXJKWKLVSURFHVVKDVJLYHQKHUDGHHSHUVHQVHRI
DGPLUDWLRQIRUWKHFRPPXQLW\6KHVDLGWKH<0&$KDVPDGHWUHPHQGRXVHIIRUWVWRZRUN
ZLWKWKHVXUURXQGLQJQHLJKEKRRGWRHQVXUHWKHLUFRQFHUQVDUHDGGUHVVHG6KHVDLGWUDIILF
DQGSDUNLQJFRQFHUQVKDYHEHHQDFFRPPRGDWHG0V0RRUHVDLGDOWKRXJKWKH<0&$¶V
SURSRVDOLVQRWWRRELJIRUWKHSURYLGHGSDUNLQJWKHDFWLYLW\DOORZHGE\WKHODUJHUIDFLOLW\LV
WRRPXFKIRUWKHQHLJKERUKRRG6KHVDLGWKH<0&$LVDSRSXODUSODFHDQGDODUJHUIDFLOLW\
ZLOODWWUDFWPRUHDFWLYLW\&RXQFLOPHPEHU0RRUHVDLGUHGXFLQJWKHVL]HRIWKHEXLOGLQJ
VRPHZKDWZLOOVWLOOPHHWWKHQHHGVRIWKHFRPPXQLW\6KHVDLGVKHKDVVRPHIOH[LELOLW\EXW
IHHOVWKHVWUXFWXUHVKRXOGEHQRODUJHUWKDQVI
0D\RU'DYLVVDLGZKLOHWKHVTXDUHIRRWDJHIRUWKHEXLOGLQJSURSRVHGE\HDFK
&RXQFLOPHPEHUGLIIHUVVRPHZKDWWKH&RXQFLOLVXQDQLPRXVLQWKHLUGHFLVLRQWKDWWKH
EXLOGLQJVL]HVKRXOGEHUHGXFHG
+HVDLG0D\RU3UR7HP&ODUN¶VPRWLRQWRDSSURYHWKHUHTXHVWZLWKDVTXDUHIRRW
VWUXFWXUHLVRQWKHIORRUDQGDVNHGLIWKHUHZDVDVHFRQG
&RXQFLOPHPEHU&ODUNPDGHDPRWLRQWRDFFHSWWKHUHTXHVWRIWKH3DUN&LWLHV<0&$WR
DPHQG3'WRGHPROLVKWKHH[LVWLQJVWUXFWXUHDQGGHYHORSDDFUHWUDFWZLWKD
VIIDFLOLW\DQGEHORZJUDGHSDUNLQJJDUDJHVXEMHFWWRFRQGLWLRQVWREHZRUNHGRXWE\&LW\
VWDIIDQG<0&$UHSUHVHQWDWLYHV&RXQFLOPHPEHU%HJHUWVHFRQGHGDQGWKHPRWLRQFDUULHG
XQDQLPRXVO\
%',6&866 :DOW+XPDQQUHTXHVWIRULPSURYHPHQWVDORQJWKHVRXWKERXQG1&HQWUDO
([SUHVVZD\IURQWDJH
Page 61 of 104
0U:DOW+XPDQQ/RYHUV/QDGGUHVVHGWKH&RXQFLOUHJDUGLQJKLVSURSRVDOIRU
XSJUDGHVWRWKHJDWHZD\HQWULHVWRWKH&LW\DQGWKHOLQHDUSDUNDUHDVDEXWWLQJWKHLQWHULRURI
WKH&HQWUDO([SUHVVZD\QRLVHEDUULHUZDOOUHSDLUVWRVLGHZDONVDORQJWKHIURQWDJHRI&HQWUDO
([SUHVVZD\DHVWKHWLFLPSURYHPHQWVWRODQGVFDSLQJRIEULGJHRYHUSDVVHVDW&HQWUDO
DHVWKHWLFLPSURYHPHQWVWRWKHQRLVHEDUULHUZDOODQGLPSURYHPHQWVUHODWHGWRSHGHVWULDQ
VDIHW\WUDIILFIORZDQGVLJQDJH0U+XPDQQVDLGLWLVLPSRUWDQWWRLPSURYHWKH
DSSHDUDQFHVDIHW\DQGIXQFWLRQRIWKHVHDUHDVDQGWRFRPSOHWHWKHLPSURYHPHQWVLQWLPHIRU
WKH%XVK&HQWHURSHQLQJLQ0DUFK+HVWDWHGWKDWSHRSOHZLOOEHFRPLQJIURPDOORYHU
WKHFRXQWU\DQGWKHZRUOGWRYLVLWWKH3UHVLGHQWLDO/LEUDU\VLWHDQGWKH&LW\VKRXOGGRZKDWLW
FDQWRHQVXUHWKHVHYLVLWRUVDUHOHIWZLWKDSRVLWLYHLPSUHVVLRQRI&LW\VXUURXQGLQJV
0U+XPDQQVDLGKHKDVPHWZLWKUHSUHVHQWDWLYHVIURPWKH&LW\WKH%XVK&HQWHU608
7['27&LW\RI'DOODVDQGFRPPXQLW\UHSUHVHQWDWLYHV'DYLG:ULJKWDQG-0RQHDUWR
GLVFXVVKLVSURSRVHGLPSURYHPHQWV+HVDLGWKH&LW\608DQGWKH%XVK&HQWHUVKRXOG
VKDUHWKHFRVWVIRUWKHLPSURYHPHQWVDQGHVWLPDWHGWKHWRWDOFRVWWREH
0U+XPDQQVXJJHVWHGWKDWWKH&LW\FRXOGVHOODSRUWLRQRIWKHORWDWWKHQRUWKZHVWFRUQHURI
/RYHUV&HQWUDODQGXVHWKRVHSURFHHGVWRKHOSSD\IRUWKHLPSURYHPHQWV
+HVDLGWKHVLGHZDONVDEXWWLQJWKH&HQWUDO([SUHVVZD\IURQWDJHURDGDUHLQYHU\SRRU
FRQGLWLRQDQGVKRZHGVRPHGHWDLOLQJSKRWRJUDSKV+HVDLGSUHOLPLQDU\HVWLPDWHVKH
REWDLQHGVKRZHGWRUHSDLUWKHZRUVWVHFWLRQVZRXOGFRVWWKH&LW\IURPWR
+HVDLGWRUHSODFHWKHWRWDOPLOHOHQJWKRIVLGHZDONZLWKFRQFUHWHZRXOGFRVW
DSSUR[LPDWHO\DQGWRUHSODFHWKDWVDPHVLGHZDONZLWKDFRQFUHWHEDVHWRSSHGZLWK
QHZSDYHUVZRXOGFRVWDSSUR[LPDWHO\
0U+XPDQQGLVSOD\HGSKRWRJUDSKVVKRZLQJIROLDJHRYHUJURZWKDW8QLYHUVLW\DQG&HQWUDO
+HVDLGKHGRHVQRWZDQWWKHILUVWLPSUHVVLRQRIWKH&LW\IRUWKHQDWLRQDOPHGLDWREHPHVV\
VLGHZDONVDQGJUDIILWLHGZDOOVDGMDFHQWWRWKHIURQWDJHURDGOHDGLQJWRWKHQHZO\RSHQHG
%XVK3UHVLGHQWLDO/LEUDU\
0U+XPDQQGLVFXVVHGKLVFRQFHUQDERXWSDLQWHGRYHUJUDIILWLRQWKHH[WHULRUQRLVHEDUULHU
ZDOOV+HWKLQNVJUDIILWLZLOOEHDKXJHSUREOHPRQFHWKHOLEUDU\RSHQV
+HVDLGWKHHVWLPDWHGFRVWIRULPSURYHPHQWVWRWKHQRLVHEDUULHUZDOOLQFOXGLQJSODQWLQJRI
WUHHVQHZODQGVFDSLQJLUULJDWLRQDQGYLGHRFDPHUDVLV +HVWDWHGWKHYLGHR
FDPHUDVZLOOGHWHUFULPHDQGUHGXFHWKHJUDIILWLSUREOHP
0U+XPDQQGLVSOD\HGDIXQGLQJPDWUL[VKRZLQJWKHILQDQFLDOUHVSRQVLELOLWLHVRIHDFK
HQWLW\IRUWKHLPSURYHPHQWV+HVDLG8QLYHUVLW\3DUNFRXOGEHUHVSRQVLEOHIRU
608FRXOGEHUHVSRQVLEOHIRUDQGWKH%XVK&HQWHUFRXOG EHUHVSRQVLEOHIRU
+HXUJHGWKH&RXQFLOWRDSSURYHLQSULQFLSOHWKHVXJJHVWHGLPSURYHPHQWVDQGWRDFFHOHUDWH
IXQGLQJLQWKH&LW\
V&DSLWDO%XGJHW
0D\RU'DYLVDVNHGZKLFKHQWLW\LVOHJDOO\UHVSRQVLEOHIRUWKHVLGHZDONVDEXWWLQJWKH&HQWUDO
([SUHVVZD\IURQWDJHURDG0U+XPDQQVDLGWKHULJKWRIZD\EHORQJVWRWKH7H[DV
'HSDUWPHQWRI7UDQVSRUWDWLRQEXWLIWKH\GRQ¶WKDYHIXQGVWRVSHQGRQODQGVFDSLQJWKHQ
WKHSODQWVZLOOGLH+HVWDWHGWKH&LW\KDVDOUHDG\H[HFXWHGDFRQWUDFWZLWK7['27WRWDNH
RYHUODQGVFDSHPDLQWHQDQFHRQWKHEULGJHRYHUSDVVHV
Page 62 of 104
0U+XPDQQDOVRVWDWHGWKDWWKHQRLVHEDUULHUZDOOLVXQGHUWKHMXULVGLFWLRQRI7['27EXW
WKHHQWLWLHVKDYHDJUHDWLQWHUHVWLQLWVPDLQWHQDQFH
0U+XPDQQVDLGWKHWKUHHHQWLWLHVVKRXOGJHWWRJHWKHUDQGJHWWKHVHUHQRYDWLRQVGRQH
EHIRUHWKHRSHQLQJRIWKH%XVK/LEUDU\LQ0DUFK
0D\RU'DYLVVDLGWKHUHDUHQRIXQGVVHWDVLGHIRUDQ\DVSHFWRIWKHZRUNUHFRPPHQGHGE\
0U+XPDQQ&RXQFLOPHPEHU%HJHUWVDLG0U+XPDQQSURYLGHGDORWRILQIRUPDWLRQWR
GLJHVWDQGKHDVNHGZKHWKHUVWDIIRUFHUWDLQFRPPLWWHHVVKRXOGUHYLHZWKHSURSRVDO+H
VDLGWKLVLVDZRQGHUIXOFRQFHSWEXWKHLVQRWSUHSDUHGWRJUDQWDSSURYDOIRUWKHZRUN+H
VXJJHVWHGWKDWWKH&DSLWDO3URMHFWV5HYLHZ&RPPLWWHHDQGWKH3DUNV$GYLVRU\&RPPLWWHH
UHYLHZWKHFRQFHSW
'LUHFWRURI3DUNV%UDGOH\VDLGWKHUHLVVHWDVLGHLQWKH)<3DUNV&DSLWDO
%XGJHWWKDWLVLGHQWLILHGIRUWKH/RYHUV/DQHSRUWDO
&RXQFLOPHPEHU0RRUHVDLGVKHLVFRQFHUQHGDERXWWKHFRQGLWLRQRIWKHZDONZD\V
DEXWWLQJWKH&HQWUDO([SUHVVZD\IURQWDJHDQGDVNHGLIWKHLUPDLQWHQDQFHLVWKH&LW\¶V
UHVSRQVLELW\'LUHFWRURI3XEOLF:RUNV6PDOOZRRGVWDWHGWKHVLGHZDONLVQRWRQ&LW\
SURSHUW\EXWWKH&LW\LVUHVSRQVLEOHIRUPDLQWHQDQFHRUUHSODFHPHQW
0D\RU3UR7HP&ODUNH[SUHVVHGFRQFHUQDERXWEHLQJDEOHWRFRPSOHWHWKLVZRUNE\0DUFK
0U+XPDQQVDLGKHWKRXJKWLWFRXOGEHFRQWUDFWHGRXWIRUFRPSOHWLRQE\WKDWGDWH
+HVDLGKHZDVZLOOLQJWRDFWDVDIDFLOLWDWRURQWKHSURMHFW+HVDLGWKHIURQWDJHVLGHZDON
ZDVWKHPRVWXUJHQWLVVXHDQGDFRQWUDFWRUWROGKLPLWFRXOGEHDGD\WRWZRPRQWKMRE
0U&ODUNVDLGLWZLOOEHGLIILFXOWWRFRRUGLQDWHWKHHQWLWLHVWRJHWWKLVSURMHFW
FRPSOHWHGTXLFNO\+HVWDWHGDQRWKHURSWLRQLVWRXVHSULYDWHIXQGLQJ+HDVNHG0U
+XPDQQLIWKLVZDVDSRVVLELOLW\0U+XPDQQVDLGKHKDGQRWH[SORUHGWKDWDYHQXHEXWIHOW
OLNHWKHUHZDVHQRXJKPRQH\ZLWKLQWKHWKUHHHQWLWLHVWRJHWWKHZRUNGRQH
&LW\$WWRUQH\'LOODUGVDLGWKH&LW\FRXOGSDUWLFLSDWHE\DJUHHPHQWLQDMRLQW
SURMHFWIDFLOLWDWHGE\DQRWKHUHQWLW\ZLWKRXWKDYLQJWRJRWKURXJKDQ\W\SHRIELGSURFHVV
&RXQFLOPHPEHU%HJHUWPDGHDPRWLRQWRUHIHUWKHSURSRVDORI:DOW+XPDQQIRU
LPSURYHPHQWVDORQJWKHVRXWKERXQG1&HQWUDO([SUHVVZD\IURQWDJHWRWKH&DSLWDO3URMHFWV
5HYLHZ&RPPLWWHHIRUIXUWKHUVWXG\DQGUHFRPPHQGDWLRQWRWKH&RXQFLO&RXQFLOPHPEHU
6WHZDUWVHFRQGHGDQGWKHPRWLRQFDUULHGXQDQLPRXVO\
'LUHFWRURI,QIRUPDWLRQ6HUYLFHV-LP&ULVZHOODGGUHVVHGWKH&RXQFLO+HVDLGKHDGYHUWLVHG
D5HTXHVWIRU3URSRVDO 5)3 IRUDQHZVRIWZDUHSDFNDJHIRUWKH&RPPXQLW\'HYHORSPHQW
'HSDUWPHQWLQ-DQXDU\+HVDLGKHDQGRWKHU&LW\VWDIIKD YHZRUNHGWKURXJKWKHELG
DQGVHOHFWLRQSURFHVVWKURXJKRXWWKHSDVWVHYHQPRQWKVDQGDUHUHDG\WRDSSURYHDFRQWUDFW
ZLWK(QHU*RY6ROXWLRQV0U&ULVZHOOVDLGZKLOH(QHU*RYZDVQRWWKHORZHVWELGGHUIRU
WKHV\VWHPWKH\ZHUHWKHEHVWILW+HVDLGVLQFHWKHELGZDVIRUDKLJKWHFKSURGXFWWKH
&LW\LVQRWUHTXLUHGWRFRQWUDFWZLWKWKHORZHVWELGGHU0U&ULVZHOOVDLG(QHU*RYZRUNV
ZLWKPDQ\PXQLFLSDOLWLHVDQGRWKHUJRYHUQPHQWHQWLWLHVDQGKDVDFOLHQWUHWHQWLRQ
&&216,'(5$1'$&7 RQDSSURYDORIDSURSRVDOIURP(QHU*RY6ROXWLRQV//&WR
SURYLGH&RPPXQLW\'HYHORSPHQW6RIWZDUHDQG,PSOHPHQWDWLRQ6HUYLFHV
Page 63 of 104
UDWH0U&ULVZHOOVDLGKHDQG5REELH&RUGHU'LUHFWRURI&RPPXQLW\'HYHORSPHQWDUH
VDWLVILHGZLWKWKHVHOHFWLRQRI(QHU*RYDQGKHDVNHGWKH&RXQFL OWRDSSURYHWKHSURSRVDO
7KHUHZHUHQRTXHVWLRQVIRU0U&ULVZHOODQG0D\RU'DYLVDVNHGIRUDPRWLRQ
&RXQFLOPHPEHU0RRUHPDGHDPRWLRQWRDSSURYHDSSURYHDSURSRVDOIURP(QHU*RY
6ROXWLRQV//&WRSURYLGH&RPPXQLW\'HYHORSPHQW6RIWZDUHDQG,PSOHPHQWDWLRQ
6HUYLFHV&RXQFLOPHPEHU%HJHUWVHFRQGHGDQGWKHPRWLRQFDUULHGXQDQLPRXVO\
&RXQFLOPHPEHU7RPP\6WHZDUWDVNHG0V/LOD0DUVKDOODPHPEHUR IWKH&ROOHJH
6FKRODUVKLS&RPPLWWHHWRDGGUHVVWKH&RXQFLO
0V0DUVKDOO:HVWFKHVWHUUHYLHZHGWKHSURJUDPZLWKWKH&RXQFLO6KHVDLGWKH
SURJUDPWRDZDUGSDUWLDOWXLWLRQVFKRODUVKLSVIRUFROOHJHRUYRFDWLRQDOVFKRROWRFKLOGUHQRI
&LW\HPSOR\HHVEHJDQDVDQRXWJURZWKRIDGRQDWLRQSUHVHQWHGWRWKH8QLYHUVLW\
3DUN&LYLF)RXQGDWLRQLQ E\IRUPHU0D\RU'RQ+RXVHPDQ0V 0DUVKDOVWDWHG
0D\RU+RXVHPDQGRQDWHGWKHIXQGVWRHQFRXUDJHFKLOGUHQRIHPSOR\HHVZLWKOLPLWHG
UHVRXUFHVWRSXUVXHSRVWVHFRQGDU\HGXFDWLRQ6KHVDLGWKHUHVLGHQWFRPPLWWHHZDVFUHDWHG
LQDQGLQFOXGHG0D\RU+RXVHPDQ%LOO-RKQVRQIRUPHU&RXQFLOPHPEHU-HUU\*UDEOH
-XG\*LEEVDQG-HDQ&ROHPDQ6KHVDLGWKHFXUUHQW&RXQFLOOLDLVRQVLQFOXGH
&RXQFLOPHPEHUV%HJHUWDQG6WHZDUW0V0DUVKDOOVWDWHGVFKRODUVKLSVZHUHJUDQWHG
GXULQJHDFKRIWKHILUVWWZR\HDUVDQGZHUHDZDUGHGWKLVIDO O6KHVDLGWKHDPRXQWVRI
WKHVFKRODUVKLSUDQJHIURPWRSHUVWXGHQWGHSHQGLQJXSRQQHHGDQGVFKRRORI
DWWHQGDQFH
0V0DUVKDOOVDLGIURPWKHRXWVHWWKHFRPPLWWHHGLVFXVVHGZKDWZRXOGKDSSHQZKHQWKH
LQWLDOGRQDWLRQZDVGHSHOHWHG6KHVDLGWKH\FRQVLGHUHGDODUJHIXQGUDLVLQJHIIRUWWR
HVWDEOLVKDQHQGRZPHQWWRHDUQHQRXJKLQWHUHVWWRFRYHUWKHDQQXDOVFKRODUVKLSDZDUGV
0V0DUVKDOOVDLGWKHFRPPLWWHHDOVRVWXGLHGZD\VWRFRQGXFWDQDQQXDOIXQGUDLVLQJHIIRUW
WRFRYHUDZDUGLQJRIVFKRODUVKLSVIRUHDFKVFKRROWHUP6KHVDLGDWKLUGRSWLRQGLVFXVVHG
ZDVWKHSRVVLELOLW\RILQFOXGLQJDYROXQWDU\PRQWKO\GRQDWLRQRQWKH&LW\¶VXWLOLW\
ELOOV6KHVDLGWKHFRPPLWWHHUHTXHVWHGWKH&LW\LQFOXGHDTXHVWLRQRQLWVELHQQLDOVXUYH\
DVNLQJDERXWUHVLGHQWLQWHUHVWLQSDUWLFLSDWLQJLQVXFKDSURJU DP6KHVDLGUHVXOWVRIWKDW
VXUYH\TXHVWLRQLQGLFDWHGDWRUDWLRRIUHVSRQGHQWVZHUHLQ IDYRURIVXFKDGRQDWLRQ
0V0DUVKDOOVDLGWKHFRPPLWWHHPDLOHGDOHWWHUWRHDFKRIWKH&LW\¶VXWLOLW\FXVWRPHUVLQ
-XO\DVNLQJIRULQSXWRQWKHSRWHQWLDOWRLQFOXGHWKLVYROXQWDU \GRQDWLRQRQXWLOLW\ELOOV6KH
VDLGWKHUHZDVQRWDELJUHVSRQVHWRWKHOHWWHUDQGDOOFRUUHVSRQGHQFHVDQGRWKHUFRPPHQWV
ZHUHSURYLGHGWRWKH&RXQFLOHDUOLHU
6KHVDLGUHVLGHQWVZLOOEHDEOHWRRSWRXWRIWKHGRQDWLRQE\FDOOLQJHPDLOLQJ
RUVHOHFWLQJDQRWLILFDWLRQER[RQWKHXWLOLW\ELOO
&RXQFLOPHPEHU6WHZDUWVDLGWKHGULYLQJIRUFHRIWKLVHIIRUWLVWRHQVXUHWKDWIXQGVZLOOEH
DYDLODEOHWRPHHWWKHFRPPLWPHQWWRDZDUGFROOHJHVFKRODUVKLSVWRFKLOGUHQRIWKH&LW\
HPSOR\HHVZKRDUHLQQHHGRIILQDQFLDODVVLVWDQFH
&LW\HPSOR\HH6DPP\&XUULHD\HDUHPSOR\HHLQWKH&LW\¶V,QIUDVWUXFWXUH0DLQWHQDQFH
'LYLVLRQ 6WUHHWV DGGUHVVHGWKH&RXQFLO+HVDLGWKHVFKRODUVKLSSURJUDPKDVKHOSHGKLV
'&216,'(5$1'$&7 RQIXQGLQJPHWKRGIRUWKH&ROOHJH6FKRODUVKLS3URJUDP
Page 64 of 104
IDPLO\DJUHDWGHDO0U&XUULHVDLGKHFDPHIURPRIIDPLO\RIFKLOGUHQDQG
JUDQGFKLOGUHQQRQHRIZKRPKDYHHYHUJUDGXDWHGIURPFROOHJH7KLVIDOOKHVDLGKLVVRQ
ZLOOJUDGXDWHIURPWKH8QLYHUVLW\RI7H[DVDW$XVWLQ+HVDLGWKHVFKRODUVKLSVDZDUGHGWR
KLVVRQRYHUWKHSDVWWKUHH\HDUVKDYHEHHQWUHPHQGRXVO\DSSUHFLDWHGDQGKDYHKHOSHGWR
SD\IRUKLVERRNV0U&XUULHVDLGKHKRSHVWKHVFKRODUVKLSSURJUDPZLOOEHDEOHWR
FRQWLQXHWRKHOSFKLOGUHQRIRWKHU&LW\HPSOR\HHVIXUWKHUWKHLUHGXFDWLRQV
&RXQFLOPHPEHU0RRUHPDGHDPRWLRQWRDGGGRQDWLRQSHUXWL OLW\ELOOZLWKDQ
HDV\RSWRXWSURYLVLRQ&RXQFLOPHPEHU&ODUNVHFRQGHGDQGWKHP RWLRQFDUULHG
XQDQLPRXVO\
'LUHFWRURI)LQDQFH.HQW$XVWLQDGGUHVVHGWKH&RXQFLO+HVDLG&RXQFLOFRQGXFWHGWZR
SXEOLFKHDULQJV$XJXVWDQG$XJXVWWRUHFHLYHFLWL]HQFR PPHQWVRQWKHSURSRVHG
EXGJHWDQGWD[UDWHIRU)<+HVDLGWKLVZDVSRVWHGRQZHEVLWHDQGDGYHUWLVHGLQWKH
3DUN&LWLHV1HZV0U$XVWLQVDLGWKLVZLOOEHWKHILQDORSSRU WXQLW\IRUUHVLGHQWLQSXWRQWKH
EXGJHWDQGWD[UDWHSULRUWRDGRSWLRQ
7KHUHZHUHQRUHTXHVWVWRDGGUHVVWKH&RXQFLORQWKHSURSRVHGEXGJHWDQGWD[UDWHDQG
0D\RU'DYLVPRYHGWRWKHQH[WDJHQGDLWHP
&RXQFLOPHPEHU%HJHUWPDGHDPRWLRQWRDSSURYHDQRUGLQDQFHDGRSWLQJWKH)<
EXGJHW&RXQFLOPHPEHU0RRUHVHFRQGHGDQGWKHPRWLRQFDUULHGXQDQLPRXVO\
&RXQFLOPHPEHU0RRUHPDGHDPRWLRQWRUDWLI\WKHSURSHUW\WD[LQFUHDVHUHIOHFWHGLQWKH
EXGJHW&RXQFLOPHPEHU6WHZDUWVHFRQGHGDQGWKHPRWLRQFDUULHGXQDQLPRXVO\
ORDINANCE NO. 12/24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS, ADOPTING A
BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2012, AND
ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2013; APPROPRIATING THE VARIOUS AMOUNTS
REQUIRED FOR SUCH BUDGET; PROVIDING FOR RECORDING OF THE
ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN
CONFLICT; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
&RXQFLOPHPEHU&ODUNPDGHDPRWLRQWRDSSURYHDQRUGLQDQFHOHY\L QJWKHSURSHUW\
WD[DWSHUWD[DEOHYDOXH&RXQFLOPHPEHU0RRUHVHFRQGHGDQGWKHPRWLRQ
FDUULHGXQDQLPRXVO\
ORDINANCE NO. 12/25
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS, LEVYING
THE AD VALOREM TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 ON ALL
TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF
UNIVERSITY PARK AS OF JANUARY 1, 2012, TO PROVIDE REVENUES FOR
THE PAYMENT OF CURRENT EXPENDITURES; PROVIDING FOR THE
(35(6(17$7,21 RISURSRVHG)<%XGJHW)LQDO3UHVHQWDWLRQ
)&216,'(5$1'$&7 RQDSSURYDORIDQRUGLQDQFHDGRSWLQJWKH)<EXGJHW
*&216,'(5$1'$&7 RQDSSURYDORIDQRUGLQDQFHOHY\LQJWKHSURSHUW \WD[
Page 65 of 104
REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
&RXQFLOPHPEHU6WHZDUWPDGHDPRWLRQWRDSSURYHDQRUGLQDQFHDGRSWLQJWKH)<SD\
SODQ&RXQFLOPHPEHU&ODUNVHFRQGHGDQGWKHPRWLRQFDUULHGXQDQLPRXVO\
ORDINANCE NO. 12/26
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS, REPEALING
AND REPLACING ORDINANCE NO. 11/22 AND ORDINANCE NO. 12/01 BY
ADOPTING A REVISED PAY PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF
UNIVERSITY PARK FOR FY 2012-2013, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
&RXQFLOPHPEHU6WHZDUWPDGHDPRWLRQWRDSSURYHDQRUGLQDQFHXSGDWLQJ7056XQLYHUVDO
VHUYLFHFUHGLWVDQGJUDQWLQJDFRVWRIOLYLQJDGMXVWPHQW&RXQFLOPHPEHU&ODUNVHFRQGHG
DQGWKHPRWLRQFDUULHGXQDQLPRXVO\
ORDINANCE NO. 12/27
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS,
AUTHORIZING AND ALLOWING, UNDER THE ACT GOVERNING THE TEXAS
MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM, "UPDATED SERVICE CREDITS” IN
SAID SYSTEM FOR SERVICE PERFORMED BY QUALIFYING MEMBERS OF
SUCH SYSTEM WHO PRESENTLY ARE EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY;
PROVIDING FOR INCREASED PRIOR AND CURRENT SERVICE ANNUITIES
FOR RETIREES AND BENEFICIARIES OF DECEASED RETIREES OF THE
CITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE FOR SUCH ACTIONS
7KHUHZHUHQRUHTXHVWVWRDGGUHVVWKH&RXQFLOIURPWKHIORRUDQG0D\RU'DYLVDGMRXUQHGWKH
PHHWLQJ
&RQVLGHUHGDQGDSSURYHGWKLVWKGD\RI6HSWHPEHU
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
:5LFKDUG'DYLV0D\RU
$77(67
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
(OL]DEHWK6SHFWRU&LW\6HFUHWDU\
+&216,'(5$1'$&7 RQRUGLQDQFHDGRSWLQJ)<SD\SODQ
,&216,'(5$1'$&7 RQDQRUGLQDQFHXSGDWLQJ7056VHUYLFHFUHGLWV
IV.ITEMS FROM THE FLOOR
Page 66 of 104
AGENDAMEMO
(9/18/2012AGENDA)
TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil
FROM:HarryPersaud,ChiefPlanningOfficial
SUBJECT:PUBLICHEARING:onarequesttoamendthedetailedsiteplanforPl anned
DevelopmentDistrictPD-1-Rtoexpandtheexistingconveniencestoresituated at
7035SniderPlaza
BACKGROUND:
ThedetailedsiteplanfortheMarino’sServiceCen ter,onpropertydescribedas7035SniderPlaza,
wasamendedinApril2001toauthorizea450square footenlargementofanexistingbuildingto
includeinstallationofrestrooms,showerandstora gespace.Thepropertyownerisnowrequesting
detailedsiteplanapprovaltoexpandtheexisting conveniencestoreby640sq.ft.fromtheexisting
floorareaofapprox.500sq.ft.Thepurposeoft heexpansionistoaccommodatebeerandwinesales
foroff-premiseconsumption.
Thedetailedsiteplanprovidesforthefollowingi mprovementsonthesite.
A)RequiredParkingCalculations:
1.Retailuses(1,146sq.ft.@1per200SF)=6spaces
2.ServiceBays(4@2spacesperbay)=8spaces
3.Employees(1peremployee)=5spaces
Total =19*
*Totalparkingspacesprovidedincludes4tandems pacesforemployees.
B)ProposedPDconditions:
1.Theexistingconveniencestorewillbeexpandedb y640squarefeet.Twenty(20)parking
spaces,includingfour(4)tandemparkingspacesfo remployeeparking,asshownonthesite
plan,willbeprovided.
2.Constructionmaterialsforthenewadditionwill blendwiththeexistingbuilding.
3.NewcurbsandlandscapingwillbeaddedalongSni derPlazaasshownonthesiteplan.
4.Allparkingspacesanddrivelaneswillbestripe dinaccordancewiththesiteplanpriorto
issuanceofacertificateofoccupancy.
5.Thetractwillbeplattedtoremoveexistinglot linesandcreateonelotandbuildingsite.
6.Engineeredfoundationplanswillberequired.
7.Separatemechanical,electrical,plumbing,fence andsignpermitswillberequired.
Theproposeddetailedsiteplanisincompliancewi ththeSniderPlazaPlannedDevelopmentDistrict
ConceptPlanapprovedbyCityCouncilonJuly7,20 09.LegalnoticeswerepostedintheParkCities
Page 67 of 104
Newsandnotificationsmailedtopropertyownerswi thin200feetofthesubjectsite.Threeresponses
attachedwerereceived,oneinfavor,oneopposeda ndoneundecided.
RECOMMENDATION:
PlanningandZoningCommissionconsideredthisitem atitsregularmeetingonAugust14,2012and
votedunanimouslytorecommendapproval.
ATTACHMENTS:
DraftOrdinance
FloorAreaLayout
BuildingElevations
MinutesofP&Z08.14.12
Detailedsiteplan
Responsesfrompropertyowners
Page 68 of 104
TM56849
ORDINANCE NO. ___________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS, AMENDING THE
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY
PARK, BY APPROVING AN AMENDED SITE PLAN FOR A PORTION OF PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1-R, FOR THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 9
AND 10, BLOCK E, CAMPUS HEIGHTS NO. 1 ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS, AND MORE COMMONLY
KNOWN AS 7035 SNIDER PLAZA; PROVIDING SPECIAL CONDITIONS; PROVIDING
FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED
THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of University Park and the
City Council of the City of University Park, in compliance with the laws of the State of Texas with
reference to the granting of zoning classifications and changes, have given the requisite notices by
publication and otherwise, and have held due hearings and afforded a full and fair hearing to all
property owners generally and to all persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the
vicinity thereof, and the City Council of the City of University Park is of the opinion and finds that
a zoning change should be granted and that the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map should
be amended; Now, Therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY
PARK, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map of the City of
University Park, Texas, as heretofore amended, are amended by approval of an amended site plan
of a portion of Planned Development District No. 1-R for the property described as Lots 9 and 10,
Block E, Campus Heights No. 1 Addition, an addition to the City of University Park, Dallas
County, Texas, and more commonly known as 7035 Snider Plaza.
SECTION 2. The amended detailed site plan setting forth the authorized land use for the
property is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and made a part hereof for all purposes, the same as if
fully copied herein. That such detailed site plan contains the data required by Section 17-101 of the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance.
Page 69 of 104
TM56849
SECTION 3. The approval of this amended detailed site plan is subject to the following
special conditions:
A. Development of the property shall be in accordance with the approved amended detailed
site plan and all provisions of Planned Development District No. 1-R and the Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance of the City of University Park, as heretofore amended and as amended hereby;
B. The existing convenience store will be expanded by 640 square feet. Twenty (20)
parking spaces, including four (4) tandem parking spaces for employee parking, as shown on the
site plan, will be provided;
C. Construction Conditions:
(1) Construction materials for the new addition will blend with the existing building;
(2) New curbs and landscaping will be added along Snider Plaza as shown on the site plan;
(3) All parking spaces and drive lanes will be striped in accordance with the site plan prior
to issuance of a certificate of occupancy;
(4) The tract will be replatted to remove existing lot lines and create one lot and building
site;
(5) Engineered foundation plans will be required;
(6) Separate mechanical, electrical, plumbing, fence and sign permits will be required.
D. Except as previously amended and as amended hereby, the special conditions of PD 1-R
shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 4. That all ordinances of the City of University Park in conflict with the
provisions of this ordinance or the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as amended hereby are
hereby repealed.
Page 70 of 104
TM56849
SECTION 5. That should any sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section
of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal, or invalid, the same shall not
affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole, or any part or provision thereof other than the part
decided to be invalid, illegal or unconstitutional, and the same shall not affect the validity of the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as a whole.
SECTION 6. That any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions or terms
of this ordinance or of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, as amended hereby, shall be subject
to the same penalty as provided for in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of
University Park, Texas, as heretofore amended, and upon conviction shall be punished by a fine not
to exceed the sum of two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense, and each and every day
such a violation is continued shall be deemed to constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 7. That this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage
and the publication of the caption, as the law and Charter in such cases provide.
DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of University Park, Texas, on the ____ day
of___________ 2012.
APPROVED:
____________________________________
W. RICHARD DAVIS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________________
LIZ SPECTOR, CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
CITY ATTORNEY
(RLD/8-29-12; 56849)
Page 71 of 104
TM56849
ORDINANCE NO. ____________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS, AMENDING THE
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, BY
APPROVING AN AMENDED SITE PLAN FOR A PORTION OF PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1-R FOR THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 9
AND 10, BLOCK E, CAMPUS HEIGHTS NO. 1 ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS, AND MORE COMMONLY
KNOWN AS 7035 SNIDER PLAZA; PROVIDING SPECIAL CONDITIONS; PROVIDING
FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED
THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of University Park, Texas, on the ____ day
of __________ 2012.
APPROVED:
____________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
Page 72 of 104
Page 73 of 104
Page 74 of 104
Page 75 of 104
Page 76 of 104
Page 77 of 104
Page 78 of 104
1
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS
MINUTES
August 14, 2012
The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of University Park met on Tuesday, August
14, 2012 at 5:00 pm in the City of University Park Council Chambers, located at 3800 University
Boulevard, University Park, Texas. The following are minutes of that meeting.
Commission Members Seated Staff Members Attending
Robert H. West, Chairman Robbie Corder, Community Development Director
Randy Biddle Harry Persaud, Chief Planning Official
Doug Roach Rob Dillard – City Attorney
Kim Kohler
Mark Aldredge
Absent
None
Present and Seated in Audience
Liz Farley
Neil Harris
Jerry Jordan
Chairman West opened the public hearing at 5:00 PM. He introduced everyone in attendance
then read the case before the commission:
PZ 12-004: Harry Persaud provided a brief overview of the proposed expansion of the
convenience stored situated at 7035 Snider Plaza. Forty-two notices were mailed to property
owners within 200’ of the subject tract. Staff has received three responses with one in favor, one
opposed, and one undecided.
Mr. West noted that the site plan for the proposed expansion needed additional detail for
landscaping, which should be installed so that drivers are alerted to the new driveway median.
Mr. West opened the public hearing. Thomas Marino, Ayman Alkurdi, and Abdulla Zeki were
present to represent the applicant, but declined to comment. With no public comments, Mr.
West closed the public hearing.
A motion was made by Doug Roach to approve the amended detailed site plan, with the
following stipulations: 1) add landscaping detail on site plan to be approved by the Director of
Community Development prior to public hearing before the City Council; 2) correct the building
elevations to reflect the location of the addition; 3) correct north arrow on the site plan. Mark
Aldredge seconded the motion. The motion was approved with a 5-0 vote.
Page 79 of 104
2
Minutes of the June 12, 2012 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting were reviewed.
Corrections were identified, and a motion was made by Mr. Biddle to approve the minutes as
amended. Mr. Kohler seconded the motion. The minutes were approved with a 5-0 vote.
With there being no further business before the Commission, Mr. West adjourned the meeting at
approx. 5:20 pm.
________________________________
Robert H. West, Chairman
Planning & Zoning Commission
Date____________________________
Page 80 of 104
AGENDAMEMO
(9/18/2012AGENDA)
TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil
FROM:HarryPersaud,ChiefPlanningOfficial
SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onanordinanceamendingthedetailedsiteplanfor property
situatedat7035SniderPlaza
BACKGROUND:
Pleaseseememowithattachmentssubmittedforpubl ichearingonthisitem.
RECOMMENDATION:
PlanningandZoningCommissionconsideredthisitem atitsregularmeetingonAugust14,2012and
votedunanimouslytorecommendapproval.
ATTACHMENTS:
DraftOrdinance
Detailedsiteplan
Floorarealayout
BuildingElevations
Page 81 of 104
TM56849
ORDINANCE NO. ___________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS, AMENDING THE
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY
PARK, BY APPROVING AN AMENDED SITE PLAN FOR A PORTION OF PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1-R, FOR THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 9
AND 10, BLOCK E, CAMPUS HEIGHTS NO. 1 ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS, AND MORE COMMONLY
KNOWN AS 7035 SNIDER PLAZA; PROVIDING SPECIAL CONDITIONS; PROVIDING
FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED
THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of University Park and the
City Council of the City of University Park, in compliance with the laws of the State of Texas with
reference to the granting of zoning classifications and changes, have given the requisite notices by
publication and otherwise, and have held due hearings and afforded a full and fair hearing to all
property owners generally and to all persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the
vicinity thereof, and the City Council of the City of University Park is of the opinion and finds that
a zoning change should be granted and that the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map should
be amended; Now, Therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY
PARK, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map of the City of
University Park, Texas, as heretofore amended, are amended by approval of an amended site plan
of a portion of Planned Development District No. 1-R for the property described as Lots 9 and 10,
Block E, Campus Heights No. 1 Addition, an addition to the City of University Park, Dallas
County, Texas, and more commonly known as 7035 Snider Plaza.
SECTION 2. The amended detailed site plan setting forth the authorized land use for the
property is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and made a part hereof for all purposes, the same as if
fully copied herein. That such detailed site plan contains the data required by Section 17-101 of the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance.
Page 82 of 104
TM56849
SECTION 3. The approval of this amended detailed site plan is subject to the following
special conditions:
A. Development of the property shall be in accordance with the approved amended detailed
site plan and all provisions of Planned Development District No. 1-R and the Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance of the City of University Park, as heretofore amended and as amended hereby;
B. The existing convenience store will be expanded by 640 square feet. Twenty (20)
parking spaces, including four (4) tandem parking spaces for employee parking, as shown on the
site plan, will be provided;
C. Construction Conditions:
(1) Construction materials for the new addition will blend with the existing building;
(2) New curbs and landscaping will be added along Snider Plaza as shown on the site plan;
(3) All parking spaces and drive lanes will be striped in accordance with the site plan prior
to issuance of a certificate of occupancy;
(4) The tract will be replatted to remove existing lot lines and create one lot and building
site;
(5) Engineered foundation plans will be required;
(6) Separate mechanical, electrical, plumbing, fence and sign permits will be required.
D. Except as previously amended and as amended hereby, the special conditions of PD 1-R
shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 4. That all ordinances of the City of University Park in conflict with the
provisions of this ordinance or the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as amended hereby are
hereby repealed.
Page 83 of 104
TM56849
SECTION 5. That should any sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section
of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal, or invalid, the same shall not
affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole, or any part or provision thereof other than the part
decided to be invalid, illegal or unconstitutional, and the same shall not affect the validity of the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as a whole.
SECTION 6. That any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions or terms
of this ordinance or of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, as amended hereby, shall be subject
to the same penalty as provided for in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of
University Park, Texas, as heretofore amended, and upon conviction shall be punished by a fine not
to exceed the sum of two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense, and each and every day
such a violation is continued shall be deemed to constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 7. That this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage
and the publication of the caption, as the law and Charter in such cases provide.
DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of University Park, Texas, on the ____ day
of___________ 2012.
APPROVED:
____________________________________
W. RICHARD DAVIS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________________
LIZ SPECTOR, CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
CITY ATTORNEY
(RLD/8-29-12; 56849)
Page 84 of 104
TM56849
ORDINANCE NO. ____________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS, AMENDING THE
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, BY
APPROVING AN AMENDED SITE PLAN FOR A PORTION OF PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1-R FOR THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 9
AND 10, BLOCK E, CAMPUS HEIGHTS NO. 1 ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS, AND MORE COMMONLY
KNOWN AS 7035 SNIDER PLAZA; PROVIDING SPECIAL CONDITIONS; PROVIDING
FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED
THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of University Park, Texas, on the ____ day
of __________ 2012.
APPROVED:
____________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
Page 85 of 104
Page 86 of 104
Page 87 of 104
Page 88 of 104
AGENDAMEMO
(9/18/2012AGENDA)
TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil
FROM:KentR.Austin,DirectorofFinance
SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onaresolutionamendingFY2012c apitalbudget
BACKGROUND:
EachyeartheCityCounciladoptsacapitalbudget,followingreviewandrecommendationbythe
CapitalProjectsReviewCommittee.TheFY2012$13,895,207capitalbudgetwasapproved
September20,2011,andwasamendedApril3,2012t ototal$13,400,207.
CitystaffandtheCPRCnowrecommendasecondand finalamendmenttotheFY2012capital
budget,whichwouldreducethetotalamountto$9,1 07,784.Ofthistotal,$8,995,170represents
projectexpenditures,and$2,000,000identifiedfor emergencyrepairs/unplannedprojectshasbeen
movedtoFY2013.
TheattachedresolutionandexhibitandCPRC8/20/2 012meetingminutesprovidedetailonthe
proposedchanges.
RECOMMENDATION:
CitystaffandtheCapitalProjectsReviewCommitte erecommendapprovaloftheresolution
amendingtheFY2012capitalbudget.
ATTACHMENTS:
CPRC8/20/2012meetingminutes
ResolutionapprovingFY2012capitalbudgetamendmen tno.2
Page 89 of 104
RESOLUTION NO. ________________________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY
PARK, TEXAS, AMENDING THE FY2012 CAPITAL PROJECTS BUDGET FOR
THE CITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of University Park uses a five-year Capital Improvement
Program (CIP) to plan and fund its capital projects; and
WHEREAS, the first year of the CIP serves as the City’s capital budget; and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved Resolution 11-11 on September 20, 2011,
adopting an FY2012 capital budget of $13,895,207 and amended the FY2012 capital budget
(Resolution 12-02) on April 3, 2012, by reducing it to $13,400,207; and
WHEREAS, the Capital Projects Review Committee has met with City staff to
consider additional changes to the FY2012 capital budget and FY2012-2017 CIP; and
WHEREAS, the Committee recommends amending the FY2012 capital budget so
that project expenditures total $8,995,170;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the FY2012 capital projects budget for the City of University
Park is hereby amended as shown on Exhibit “A.”
SECTION 2. This Resolution shall take effect immediately from and after its
passage, and it is accordingly so resolved.
DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of University Park, Texas, on the
18th day of September, 2012.
APPROVED:
__________________________________
W. RICHARD DAVIS, MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
__________________________________ __________________________________
CITY ATTORNEY ELIZABETH SPECTOR,
CITY SECRETARY
Page 90 of 104
EXHIBIT “A”
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS
FY2012 CAPITAL BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 2—9/18/2012
ADOPTEDCHANGESAMENDED
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
13120Enterprise GIS system upgrade47,020 (47,020) -
13200Court software replacement - - -
13300Finance/UB software upgrade-NewWorld Sys.6,502 - 6,502
13400Community Development software replacement250,000 (133,017) 116,983
13500City Web site enhancement/upgrade150,000 (70,000) 80,000
13600Microsoft Exchange email upgrade8,000 - 8,000
13700Time & Attendance system replacement45,000 (45,000) -
13800Network Security Upgrades 75,000 - 75,000
14300Peek Center Dispatch Equipment Replacement50,000 - 50,000
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUBTOTAL 631,522 (295,037) 336,485
PARKS
22900Park Decorative and Security Lighting30,000 - 30,000
23400University Blvd. medians 241,904 - 241,904
24000Daniel and Hillcrest Median Construction50,000 (50,000) -
24600Germany Park South - - -
24700Curtis Park bridge reconstruction50,000 - 50,000
25100Barns-Dublin-Douglas medians120,000 - 120,000
25200McFarlin Median Upgrade 20,000 - 20,000
25500Peek Service Center Landscape15,000 (5,000) 10,000
25600Williams Park Improvements105,000 - 105,000
PARKS SUBTOTAL 631,904 (55,000) 576,904
PUBLIC SAFETY
33000Fire training tower renovation 9,012 - 9,012
33500Microwave Radio Path/Tower Relocation123,000 - 123,000
33600Public Safety software upgrade-OSSI/Firehouse103,000 - 103,000
PUBLIC SAFETY SUBTOTAL 235,012 - 235,012
PUBLIC WORKS
42731Asphalt Overlay Program 2011-121,125,000 - 1,125,000
42996Curb & Gutter Replacement 2007-08953,026 - 953,026
43001Curb & Gutter Replace. 2012-13 (McFarlin Medians)130,000 (115,000) 15,000
44401Hillcrest-Daniel intersection revision45,000 - 45,000
45500Old Peek Center screening wall125,000 - 125,000
47010MPY 4000 Hanover/Purdue & Other Alleys- - -
47016 MPY Baltimore/3800-3900 Amherst-Stanford & Other Alley - - -
47017MPY Tulane-Bryn Mawr north to Caruth2,745,000 - 2,745,000
47030MPY 4400 San Carlos/Potomac & Other Alleys314,820 - 314,820
47200MPY Key Street et al 1,050,000 - 1,050,000
47230MPY Douglas sewer main--Emerson to Lovers130,000 - 130,000
48100Fondren Water Tank Renovation254,629 - 254,629
48410Booster pump station 15,000 65,000 80,000
48600Wastewater metering stations37,194 - 37,194
49150 Westwick Pavement/Drainage Recon. (Specific Alley Pave 605,000 - 605,000
49210University-Boedeker pavement reconstruction1,650,000 (1,520,000) 130,000
49230Water Meter replacement 600,000 (600,000) -
49250Traffic signal Lovers@Baltimore 122,100 - 122,100
49260Paving-drainage misc. locations NEW- 115,000 115,000
PUBLIC WORKS SUBTOTAL 9,901,769 (2,055,000) 7,846,769
Projects contingency:
Unplanned projects 2,000,000 (2,000,000) -
Unplanned subtotal 2,000,000 (2,000,000) -
Total project expenditures 13,400,207 (4,405,037) 8,995,170
FY2012
Page 91 of 104
1
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS
CAPITAL PROJECTS REVIEW COMMITTEE
MONDAY, AUGUST 20, 2012, AT 4:00 P.M.
UNIVERSITY PARK CITY HALL
SECOND FLOOR CITY COUNCIL OVERFLOW ROOM
M I N U T E S
Attending:
Brunz, Roy
Cooke, Steve
Davis, Dick
DeLorenzo, Dave
Holmes, James
Houseman, Lon
Ibarra, Raquel
Lane, Olin
Metzger, Steve
Murzin, Chris
Peek, Harold
Absent:
Strodel, Dan
Walker, Kelly
City staff:
Austin, Kent
Bennie, Lynn
Bradley, Gerry
Corder, Robbie
Criswell, Jim
Ertle, George
Howell, Randy
Irvin, Ken
Ledat, Jodie
Livingston, Bob
Mace, Steve
Smallwood, Bud
Speer, Jacob
Whaling, Bob
1. Call to Order
Chairman Olin Lane called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m.
2. Introductions / welcome new members.
Chairman Lane welcomed new members Roy Brunz and Lon Houseman and asked them to
tell the Committee about themselves.
3. Review and approve minutes from May 14, 2012 meeting.
Steve Metzger moved to approve the minutes of the May 14, 2012 meeting. Mayor Davis
seconded, and the motion was approved unanimously.
4. Review budget to actual report for FY2012.
Kent Austin invited the Committee to review current year project activity, followed by
proposed changes to the FY2012 capital budget, and then review the proposed FY2013-17
plan.
Austin directed the committee’s attention to page 4 of the agenda packet, which displays the
FY2012 budget to actual summary. As of 8/15/2012, actual FY2012 project expenditures
totaled $5,236,517 compared with the budget of $13,400,207 and year-to-date (YTD)
revenues of $4,363,063.
Page 92 of 104
2
Referring to agenda packet pages 5 and 6, Austin noted the Committee would find YTD and
life-to-date (LTD) figures for each project as of August 15, 2012, and on pages 7 and 8
department director comments were provided for all current projects. Chairman Lane asked
Bud Smallwood about the Wastewater Metering Stations (Project 48600) and the Water
Meter Replacement project (49230). Smallwood noted there is one additional wastewater
meter to be installed at Normandy and St. Andrews, and the water meter replacement project
was in the final weeks of beta testing
5. Review and make recommendation regarding proposed changes to FY2012 capital budget.
Austin noted the prior pages display the budget as it currently stands and that pages 9 and 10
show proposed changes to the FY2012 capital budget. Mr. Austin asked Jim Criswell to
discuss his proposed changes.
Mr. Criswell provided the committee with an update on current IS (Information Services)
projects and proposed the following changes.
Mr. Criswell introduced future projects to the committee including replacement of the City’s
telephone system (Project 14400), replacement of security cameras (Project 14500), and
replacement of the 911 radio recording system (Project 14600) among others.
Gerry Bradley provided the committee with an update of current Parks projects, and
discussed a change in funding for the Goar Park Brook Improvement (Project 25900). Mr.
Bradley indicated $50,000 was originally budgeted for the project, but bids came in
significantly higher than anticipated. Bradley explained the current pump setup used in the
Creek was predisposed to silt buildup and debris collection, causing the pump motor to burn
out at a cost of $50,000–$60,000 since 2007.
The proposed improvement would raise the pump out of the water and onto land and use an
automatic shut-off feature that would prevent the motor from burning out. To avoid
increasing the FY2013 Parks capital budget, Bradley proposed that the following projects be
defunded to increase the budget for Project 25900 to $180,000:
ADOPTEDCHANGESAMENDEDCURRENTCHANGESREVISED
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
13120Enterprise GIS system upgrade47,020 (47,020) - 134,036 - 134,036
13200Court software replacement - - - 92,740 - 92,740
13300Finance/UB software upgrade-NewWorld Sys.6,502 - 6,502 318,542 - 318,542
13400Community Development software replacement250,000 (133,017) 116,983 250,000 - 250,000
13500City Web site enhancement/upgrade150,000 (70,000) 80,000 220,000 - 220,000
13600Microsoft Exchange email upgrade8,000 - 8,000 70,000 - 70,000
13700Time & Attendance system replacement45,000 (45,000) - 45,000 - 45,000
13800Network Security Upgrades 75,000 - 75,000 75,000 - 75,000
14300Peek Center Dispatch Equipment Replacement50,000 - 50,000 50,000 - 50,000
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUBTOTAL 631,522 (295,037) 336,485 1,255,318 - 1,255,318
FY2012TOTAL PROJECT ESTIMATE
Page 93 of 104
3
Discussion followed Bradley’s proposal regarding the new pump site, noise abatement, and
funding impacts on other Parks projects in FY2013. For FY2012, Bradley proposed the
following changes:
Advancing to the Public Safety projects, Austin asked Jim Criswell about Project 33600,
Public Safety Software Upgrade. Criswell said the $93,000 in the FY2012 budget was the
fourth installment of the project.
The Committee and staff agreed that Project 33700, Fire Life Pac Defibrillator Replacement
should be removed from the capital budget and instead funded through Equipment Services.
Bud Smallwood addressed the Committee regarding scope increase in multiple projects.
Smallwood proposed the following changes to the Public Works FY2012 capital budget.
FY2013
Project 25900
ProjectDescriptionFunding Sources
25900Original amount50,000
22900Park Decorative and Security Lighting30,000
24000Daniel & Hillcrest Medians 50,000
24200Caruth Park pond improvements50,000
Total 180,000
FY2012TOTAL PROJECT ESTIMATE
ADOPTEDCHANGESAMENDEDCURRENTCHANGESREVISED
PUBLIC WORKS
42731Asphalt Overlay Program 2011-121,125,000 - 1,125,000 1,125,000 - 1,125,000
42996Curb & Gutter Replacement 2007-08953,026 - 953,026 3,869,973 - 3,869,973
43001Curb & Gutter Replace. 2012-13 (McFarlin Medians)130,000 (115,000) 15,000 1,595,117 (1,580,117) 15,000
44401Hillcrest-Daniel intersection revision45,000 - 45,000 53,000 - 53,000
45500Old Peek Center screening wall125,000 - 125,000 151,124 - 151,124
47010MPY 4000 Hanover/Purdue & Other Alleys- - - 1,283,660 - 1,283,660
47016 MPY Baltimore/3800-3900 Amherst-Stanford & Other Alley - - - 1,968,660 - 1,968,660
47017MPY Tulane-Bryn Mawr north to Caruth2,745,000 - 2,745,000 2,875,000 215,000 3,090,000
47030MPY 4400 San Carlos/Potomac & Other Alleys314,820 - 314,820 1,461,000 - 1,461,000
47200MPY Key Street et al 1,050,000 - 1,050,000 1,550,000 - 1,550,000
47230MPY Douglas sewer main--Emerson to Lovers130,000 - 130,000 1,430,000 - 1,430,000
48100Fondren Water Tank Renovation254,629 - 254,629 969,537 - 969,537
48410Booster pump station 15,000 65,000 80,000 4,707,419 65,000 4,772,419
48600Wastewater metering stations37,194 - 37,194 100,000 - 100,000
49150 Westwick Pavement/Drainage Recon. (Specific Alley Pave 605,000 - 605,000 661,542 - 661,542
49210University-Boedeker pavement reconstruction1,650,000 (1,520,000) 130,000 1,769,300 200,117 1,969,417
49230Water Meter replacement 600,000 (600,000) - 3,000,000 - 3,000,000
49250Traffic signal Lovers@Baltimore 122,100 - 122,100 132,000 - 132,000
49260Paving-drainage misc. locations NEW- 115,000 115,000 - 830,000 830,000
PUBLIC WORKS SUBTOTAL 9,901,769 (2,055,000) 7,846,769 28,702,332 (270,000) 28,432,332
Page 94 of 104
4
Smallwood continued by providing an update on current Public Works projects and
introduced a newly proposed project that would address much needed repairs to the City’s
facility at 4419 Worcola (Old Peek Center, Project 42980). He reported that the building was
over 30 years old, and while structurally sound, the facade, parking lot, and roof are falling
apart. Harold Peek commented that the project estimate of $4 million, scheduled for
FY2014-FY2016, is a lot of money, and he asked what the renovated building would be used
for. Smallwood said primarily secure vehicle storage. Peek suggested, and the Committee
concurred, that the project should not be funded until more details and study are undertaken.
6. Review and make recommendation regarding FY2012 – 2017 Capital Improvement Plan.
Chairman Lane indicated the Committee needs to send a recommendation to the City Council
regarding the proposed changes. Chairman Lane made the motion to approve the proposed
changes to the FY2012 capital budget, including the removal of Project 33700, and to
approve the proposed FY2013 capital budget and FY2014-2017 CIP, exclusive of the Old
Peek Center renovations. Steve Metzger seconded, and the motion passed unanimously.
7. Questions and answers regarding specific projects.
Please see agenda item 5.
8. Schedule next meeting date: proposed date – October 22, 2012.
The next meeting is scheduled for October 22. 2012.
9. Adjourn
Chairman Lane adjourned the meeting at 5:22 pm.
________________________________ ________________________________
Olin Lane, Chair Kent Austin, Director of Finance
Page 95 of 104
AGENDAMEMO
(9/18/2012AGENDA)
TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil
FROM:KentR.Austin,DirectorofFinance
SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onaresolutionadoptingtheFY20 13capitalbudget
BACKGROUND:
Asdescribedinthepreviousagendaitemamendingt heFY2012capitalbudget,eachyeartheCity
Councilapprovesacapitalbudgetthatallocatesfu ndingforaspecificlistofprojects.Thecapital
budgetisthefirstyearoftherollingfive-yearC apitalImprovementsProgram(CIP).
CitystaffmetwiththeCapitalProjectsReviewCom mittee(CPRC)August20,2012;minutesare
includedwiththepreviousagendaitem.TheCommit teevotedtorecommendapprovalofthe
FY2013capitalbudgetof$10,208,890,comprisedof thefollowingsegments:
AlistofthespecificprojectsscheduledforFY201 3isincludedasanexhibittotheresolution
adoptingthecapitalbudget.ThefiveyearCIP,fo rtheperiodFY2013-2017,isalsoincludedwiththis
agendaiteminsummaryanddetailformats.
Category FY2013budget
Personnel(CivilEngineer)$102,736
InformationTechnology $716,037
Parks $800,000
PublicSafety $90,000
PublicWorks $6,000,117
UnplannedProjects/EmergencyRepairs $2,500,000
Total $10,208,890
RECOMMENDATION:
CitystaffandtheCPRCrecommendapprovalofthere solutionadoptingtheFY2013capitalbudget.
ATTACHMENTS:
ResolutionadoptingFY2013capitalbudget
CIP5-yeardetailFY2013-2017
CIP5-yearsummaryFY2013-2017
Page 96 of 104
RESOLUTION NO. ________________________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY
PARK, TEXAS, ADOPTING THE FY2013 CAPITAL PROJECTS BUDGET FOR
THE CITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of University Park uses a five-year Capital Improvement
Program (CIP) to plan and fund its capital projects; and
WHEREAS, City staff has identified a series of specific projects for implementation
in the fiscal years 2013 through 2017; and
WHEREAS, the first year of the five-year CIP serves as the City’s capital budget;
and
WHEREAS, the Capital Projects Review Committee has met with City staff to
review and consider the proposed FY2013-2017 projects; and
WHEREAS, the Committee recommends adoption of the FY2013 capital projects
budget totaling $10,208,890;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the FY2013 capital projects budget for the City of University
Park is hereby adopted as shown on Exhibit “A.”
. SECTION 2. This Resolution shall take effect October 1, 2012, and it is accordingly
so resolved.
DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of University Park, Texas, on the
18th day of September, 2012.
APPROVED:
__________________________________
W. RICHARD DAVIS, MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
__________________________________ __________________________________
CITY ATTORNEY ELIZABETH SPECTOR,
CITY SECRETARY
Page 97 of 104
EXHIBIT “A”
Revenues
Transfers from General Fund (budgeted)3,032,187
Transfers from Utility Fund (budgeted)2,195,420
Investment income 5,000
Other revenue -
Total Revenues 5,232,607
Expenditures
Personnel (Civil Engineer) & other expenses102,736
Tot. Proj. Est.Budgeted Projects:
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
134,03613120Enterprise GIS system upgrade122,020
250,00013400Community Development software replacement133,017
220,00013500City Web site enhancement/upgrade110,000
45,00013700Time & Attendance system replacement45,000
150,00014000Virtual desktop interface150,000
96,00014100LaserFiche upgrade with eForms96,000
60,00014200Network backup storage replacement60,000
955,036 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUBTOTAL 716,037
PARKS
50,00024200Caruth Park Pond Improvements50,000
160,00025100Barns-Dublin-Douglas medians upgrade40,000
300,00025200McFarlin medians upgrade (Hillcrest to Golf)280,000
15,00025500Peek Service Center landscape5,000
235,00025700Caruth Park Playground Improvements NEW 235,000
10,00025800Elena's Children's Park Improvements NEW 10,000
180,00025900Goar Park Brook Improvements NEW180,000
950,000 PARKS SUBTOTAL 800,000
PUBLIC SAFETY
476,48333600Public Safety software upgrade-OSSI/Firehouse90,000
476,483 PUBLIC SAFETY SUBTOTAL 90,000
PUBLIC WORKS
650,00042732Asphalt Overlay Program 2012-13650,000
200,00043741Peek Center Emergency Operations Center 200,000
3,090,00047017MPY Tulane--Bryn Mawr north to Caruth 215,000
1,461,00047030MPY 4400 San Carlos/Potomac & other alleys800,000
1,430,00047230MPY Douglas Sewer Main--Emerson to Lovers800,000
650,00047240MPY Lomo Alto Sewer Main--Lovers to Greenbrier 150,000
1,969,41749210University-Boedeker Pavement Reconstruction1,720,117
3,000,00049230Water Meter Replacement600,000
830,00049260Paving and Drainage--Miscellaneous Locations715,000
150,00049270HP-UP Shared Sanitary Sewer150,000
13,430,417 PUBLIC WORKS SUBTOTAL 6,000,117
Projects contingency:
2,000,000Unplanned projects 2,500,000
2,000,000 Unplanned subtotal 2,500,000
17,811,936 TOTAL PROJECT EXPENDITURES 10,106,154
Total Fund expenditures 10,208,890
Excess/(deficiency) of revenues (4,976,283)
Transfers, Special -
Net change in fund balance (4,976,283)
Working Capital - beginning 5,226,433
Working Capital - ending 250,150
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS
FY2013 CAPITAL BUDGET
9/18/2012
Page 98 of 104
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS
FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM SUMMARY
FY 2012 - 2017 (09/18/2012)
REVISED(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)
FY 2012FY 2013FY 2014FY 2015FY 2016FY2017TOTAL
Beginning Balance 9,096,6105,236,433260,150838,7671,725,74239,44816,307,982
Revenues
General Fund budget3,032,1873,032,1873,123,1533,216,8473,216,8473,216,84733,910,910
Utility Fund budget2,195,4202,195,4202,261,2832,329,1212,329,1212,329,12124,426,619
Fund Balance Transfer (General Fund)0000007,485,701
nd Balance Transfer (Utility/Eq Svcs Fund)0000002,000,000
Investment income20,0005,0005,00020,00020,00020,0001,231,141
Other revenues 0000002,544,973
Total Revenues 5,247,6075,232,6075,389,4355,565,9685,565,9685,565,96873,789,514
Total Available Resources 14,344,21710,469,0405,649,5856,404,7357,291,7115,605,41690,097,496
Expenditures
Personnel112,614102,736105,818108,993112,262115,6301,027,450
Information Technology336,485716,037375,000310,00040,00002,546,270
Parks 576,904800,000560,000200,000180,000655,0009,427,847
Public Safety235,01290,00000001,876,984
Public Works7,846,769 6,000,117 3,270,000 3,560,000 6,420,000 3,350,000 69,592,976
FILENAME: P:\CIP Folder\Working\CIP workbook v42 09-18-2012.xlsx FIVE YEAR CIP SUMMARY
LAST PRINTED: 9/13/2012 2:02 PM
Public Works 7,846,769 6,000,117 3,270,000 3,560,000 6,420,000 3,350,000 69,592,976
Emergency Repairs/Unplanned Projects02,500,000500,000500,000500,000500,0004,641,183
Projects subtotal8,995,17010,106,1544,705,0004,570,0007,140,0004,505,00088,085,260
Total Expenditures 9,107,78410,208,8904,810,8184,678,9937,252,2624,620,63089,112,710
Ending Balance 5,236,433 260,150838,7671,725,74239,448984,786984,786
FILENAME: P:\CIP Folder\Working\CIP workbook v42 09-18-2012.xlsx FIVE YEAR CIP SUMMARY
LAST PRINTED: 9/13/2012 2:02 PM
Page 99 of 104
City of University Park, Texas
Capital Improvements Plan FY2012-2017
(09/18/2012)
NOTE: "TOTAL" column includes off-page amounts.
REVISED(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)TOTAL
Project Category/Title Project No.FY 2012FY 2013FY 2014FY 2015FY 2016FY 2017THRU FY2017
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Enterprise GIS system upgrade13120122,020 134,036
Court software replacement 132000 92,740
Finance/UB software upgrade-NewWorld Sys.133006,502 318,542
Community Development software replacement13400116,983133,017 250,000
City Web site enhancement/upgrade1350080,000110,000 220,000
Microsoft Exchange email upgrade136008,000 70,000
Time & Attendance system replacement1370045,000 45,000
Network security upgrades 1380075,000 75,000
Virtual desktop interface 14000150,000 150,000
LaserFiche upgrade with eForms1410096,000 96,000
Network backup storage replacement1420060,000 60,000
Peek Center equipment replacement1430050,000 50,000
Telephone system upgrade (2014)14400 200,000 200,000
Security camera I/P video conversion14500 75,000 75,000
911 / Radio Recording System Upgrade NEW14600 100,000 100,000
Police In-Car Digital Video Camera System Upgrade NEW 1470078,000 0
Citywide Access Control System Upgrade NEW14800 100,000 100,000
Community Development Electronic Plan Review NEW14900 70,000 70,000
New World Finance System Hardware Replacement NEW15000 70,000 70,000
Sungard OSSI Police System Hardware Replacement NEW15100 70,000 70,000
Planned Server Hardware Replacement NEW15200 40,000 40,000
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUBTOTAL 336,485716,037375,000310,00040,00002,546,270
PARKS
Park Decorative and Security Lighting2290030,00030,000 30,000
University Blvd. Medians/Hunters Glen & Druid Medians 23400241,904 261,430
Athletic Field Fencing Replacement23500 30,000 30,000
Daniel & Hillcrest Medians 24000050,000 0
Hunters Glen & Druid Median (combine with 23400)24100 22,278
Caruth Park Pond Improvements2420050,000 50,000
Snider Plaza Landscape Improvements24300 0
Germany Park South COMPLETE24600 362,500
Curtis Park bridge reconstruction COMPLETE2470050,000 50,000
Barns-Dublin-Douglas medians upgrade25100120,00040,000 160,000
McFarlin medians upgrade (Hillcrest to Golf)2520020,000280,000 300,000
Burleson Park renovation 25300 300,000 300,000
Lovers Lane entrance portal 25400 150,000 150,000
Peek Service Center landscape2550010,0005,000 15,000
Williams Park improvements25600105,000 105,000
Caruth Park Playground Improvements NEW25700235,000 235,000
Elena's Children's Park Improvements NEW2580010,000 10,000
Goar Park Brook Improvements NEW25900180,000 180,000
CIP workbook v42 09-18-2012.xlsx 9/13/2012 1:20 PM
Page 100 of 104
City of University Park, Texas
Capital Improvements Plan FY2012-2017
(09/18/2012)
NOTE: "TOTAL" column includes off-page amounts.
REVISED(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)TOTAL
Project Category/Title Project No.FY 2012FY 2013FY 2014FY 2015FY 2016FY 2017THRU FY2017
Bench/table replacements NEW 50,000 50,000
Goar Park restroom structureNEW 60,000 60,000
John Roach track repainting NEW 50,000 50,000
LED lighting upgrades NEW 30,000 30,000 60,000
Mockingbird Lane wall landscapeNEW 75,000 75,000
Pool building upgrades NEW 500,000 500,000
Preston Road landscape and lightingNEW 100,000 100,000
Tennis court resurfacing programNEW 70,000 70,000
Walt Humann Park playground replacementNEW 150,000 150,000
PARKS SUBTOTAL 576,904800,000560,000200,000180,000655,0009,427,847
PUBLIC SAFETY
Fire training tower renovation330009,012 620,001
Microwave Radio Path/Tower Relocation33500123,000 125,000
Public Safety software upgrade-OSSI/Firehouse33600103,00090,000 476,483
Fire Life Pac defibrillator replacement 33700160,000 0
PUBLIC SAFETY SUBTOTAL 235,01290,000 00001,878,419
PUBLIC WORKS
Asphalt Overlay Program 2011-12427311,125,000 1,125,000
Asphalt Overlay Program 2012-1342732650,000 650,000
Asphalt Overlay Program 2013-1442733 650,000 650,000
Asphalt Overlay Program 2014-1542734 650,000 650,000
Asphalt Overlay Program 2015-16 NEW42735 650,000 650,000
Asphalt Overlay Program 2016-17 NEW42736 650,000 650,000pyg,,
Curb & Gutter Replacement 2007-0842996953,026 3,869,973
C&G Replacement 2012-13 (McFARLIN MEDIANS)4300115,000 00 15,000
Curb & Gutter Replacement 2013-14 => FY2015430020400,000 400,000
Peek Center EOC (Emergency Operations Center)43741200,000 200,000
Hillcrest 12" Water Line 44400 700,000 700,000
Hillcrest-Daniel intersection revision4440145,000 53,000
Old Peek Center Screening Wall45500125,000 151,124
MPY 4000 Hanover/Purdue & Other Alleys COMPLETE47010 1,283,660
MPY Baltimore/3800-3900 Amherst-Stanford & Other Alleys C 47016 1,968,660
MPY Tulane-Bryn Mawr north to Caruth470172,745,000215,000 3,090,000
MPY 4100-4500 Shenandoah/Normandy47020 170,0001,000,000 800,000 1,970,000
MPY 4400 San Carlos/Potomac & Other Alleys47030314,820800,000200,000 1,461,000
MPY 4200-4500 Normandy/San Carlos ==> FY201547040 190,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 2,190,000
MPY 41-4400 Windsor/Stanhope ==> FY201547050 180,000 1,420,000 400,000 2,000,000
MPY Key Street et al 472001,050,000 1,550,000
MPY Douglas Sewer Main - Emerson to Lovers 47230130,000800,000500,000 1,430,000
MPY Lomo Alto Sewer Main - Lovers to Greenbrier47240150,000 500,000650,000
MPY Lovers Lane Water Main - Preston to Lomo Alto47250 550,000 550,000
CIP workbook v42 09-18-2012.xlsx 9/13/2012 1:20 PM
Page 101 of 104
City of University Park, Texas
Capital Improvements Plan FY2012-2017
(09/18/2012)
NOTE: "TOTAL" column includes off-page amounts.
REVISED(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)TOTAL
Project Category/Title Project No.FY 2012FY 2013FY 2014FY 2015FY 2016FY 2017THRU FY2017
Fondren Water Tank Renovation48100254,629 969,537
Booster Pump Station COMPLETE4841080,000 4,772,419
Wastewater metering stations4860037,194 100,000
Miracle Mile pavement and drainage48910 200,000940,0001,450,0002,590,000
Westwick Pavement/Drainage Recon. (Specific Alley Paveme 49150605,000 661,542
University-Boedeker pavement reconstruction49210130,0001,720,117 1,969,417
Water meter replacement 492300600,000600,000600,000 600,000 600,000 3,000,000
Traffic signal Lovers@Baltimore 49250122,100 132,000
Paving and Drainage - Miscellaneous Locations49260115,000715,000 830,000
UP - HP Shared Sanitary Sewer49270150,000 150,000
Old Peek Center Renovation (roof, fuel island, paving, etc)49280 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 4,000,000
PUBLIC WORKS SUBTOTAL 7,846,7696,000,1173,270,0003,560,0006,420,0003,350,00069,732,723
EMERGENCY REPAIRS/UNPLANNED PROJECTS 02,500,000500,000500,000 500,000 500,000 4,500,000
GRAND TOTAL 8,995,17010,106,1544,705,0004,570,0007,140,0004,505,00088,085,260
CIP workbook v42 09-18-2012.xlsx 9/13/2012 1:20 PM
Page 102 of 104
AGENDAMEMO
(9/18/2012AGENDA)
TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil
FROM:GerryBradley,ParksDirector
SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onarequestfromaresidentforspecificimproveme ntsto
HolmesAquaticCenterconcessionsarea
BACKGROUND:
StaffwascontactedbyUniversityParkresidentJef fFrenchregardinghisideasforchangestothe
HolmesAquaticCenterconcessionsarea.Mr.French hasindicatedhewouldliketopresentideasto
transformtheexistingconcessionbuildingintomo reofanopenaircantina.Mr.Frenchhasrequested
tospeakwithCityCouncilconcerningthisitem.
RECOMMENDATION:
StaffwilltakedirectionfromCityCouncilonhow toproceedwiththisrequest.
FUNDINGSOURCE:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
Residentrequestemail
Page 103 of 104
From: Jeff French
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 9:32 AM
To: Gerry Bradley
Cc: Cora Billingsly
Subject: Holmes pool cantina
Gerry,
My idea is very simply to change out the snack bar, and turn it into a cantina with a beach
theme...
I can present drawings or sketches or outlines to the Parks Board in person.
Outline...
Replace current stucture with a food grade food and beverage prep area
Wrap around bar, tables, overhead canopy.
Beach themed, kiddie cocktails, blender beverages.
Built in grill for burgers, hot dogs, like a ski area cantina or beach cantina.
Speakers built in, flat panel TV at the serving bar
Additional income as a % to UP Parks or HP school district...
Gerry thanks for your support, this could be a really fun addition to the new UP pool.
Thanks,
Jeff
Jeffrey S. French
Page 104 of 104