HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012.09.04 City Council AgendaCITYOFUNIVERSITYPARK
REGULARCITYCOUNCILMEETING
LOCATION:CITYHALLCOUNCILCHAMBER
AGENDA#2845
SEPTEMBER4,2012
CALLTOORDER:5:00P.M.
4:00-5:00P.M.WORKSESSIONFORAGENDAREVIEW:TheCouncilwillmeetinopenwork
sessiontoreceiveagendaitembriefingsfromstaff.Noactionwillbetaken.Council
ConferenceRoom,2ndFloor,CityHall.
TOSPEAKONANAGENDAITEM
AnyonewishingtoaddresstheCouncilonanyitemmustfilloutagreen“RequesttoSpeak”formand
returnittotheCitySecretary.WhencalledforwardbytheMayor,beforebeginningtheirremarks,speakers
areaskedtogotothepodiumandstatetheirnameandaddressfortherecord.
I.CALLTOORDER
A.INVOCATION:CityManagerBobLivingston
B.PLEDGEOFALLEGIANCE:CityManagerBobLivingston/BoyScouts
C.INTRODUCTIONOFCOUNCIL:MayorW.RichardDavis
D.INTRODUCTIONOFSTAFF:CityManagerBobLivingston
II.CONSENTAGENDA
A.CONSIDERANDACT:onrequestfromSMUtotemporarilycloseHillcrestAve.
fromUniversityBlvd.toMockingbirdLn.duringtheirHomecomingparade
B.CONSIDERANDACT:onarequestbySMUKappaAlphaThetaSororitytoconduct
5kraceoncertaincitystreets
C.CONSIDERANDACT:onordinanceamendingFY2012budget
D.CONSIDERANDACT:onthepurchaseofreplacementequipmentforbackup
dispatchcenter
E.CONSIDERANDACT:onaproposalfromR.L.GoodsonConsultingEngineersto
developacomprehensivestormwaterdrainagemapreport
F.CONSIDERANDACT:onaproposalfromFreese&Nicholstoconducthydraulic
modelingoftheUniversityPark-HighlandParksharedsanitarysewertrunkmain
G.CONSIDERANDACT:onaresolutionapprovinganinterlocalagreementwithDallas
CountyforparticipationintheirHouseholdHazardousWasteprogram
H.CONSIDERANDACT:onminutesoftheAugust28,2012CityCouncilMeeting
III.MAINAGENDA
A.CONSIDERANDACT:onarequestbytheParkCitiesYMCAtoamendPlanned
DevelopmentDistrictPD-12,todemolishtheexistingstructureandredevelopa3.72
acretractmoreorless,withanew65,000sq.ft.facilityandabelowgradeparking
garage.
B.DISCUSS:WaltHumannrequestforimprovementsalongthesouthboundN.Central
Expresswayfrontage
C.CONSIDERANDACT:onapprovalofaproposalfromEnerGovSolutions,LLCto
provideCommunityDevelopmentSoftwareandImplementationServices
D.CONSIDERANDACT:onfundingmethodfortheCollegeScholarshipProgram
E.PRESENTATION:ofproposedFY2013Budget-FinalPresentation
F.CONSIDERANDACT:onapprovalofanordinanceadoptingtheFY2013budget
G.CONSIDERANDACT:onapprovalofanordinancelevyingthe2012propertytax
H.CONSIDERANDACT:onordinanceadoptingFY2013payplan
I.CONSIDERANDACT:onanordinanceupdatingTMRSservicecredits
IV.PUBLICCOMMENTS
AnyonewishingtoaddressanitemnotontheAgendashoulddosoatthistime.Pleasebe
advisedthatundertheTexasOpenMeetingsAct,theCouncilcannotdiscussoractatthis
meetingonamatterthatisnotlistedontheAgenda.However,inresponsetoaninquiry,a
Councilmembermayrespondwithastatementofspecificfactualinformationora
recitationofexistingpolicy.ItistheCouncil’spolicytorequestthatcitizensnotaddress
itemsthatarecurrentlyscheduledforafutureagendaorpublichearing.Instead,theCouncil
requeststhatcitizensattendthatspecificmeetingtoexpresstheiropinions,orcommentto
theCouncilbye-mailatCity-Council@uptexas.orgorletter addressedtotheMayorand
Councilat3800UniversityBlvd.,UniversityPark,Texas75205.Otherquestionsorprivate
commentsfortheCityCouncilorStaffshouldbedirectedtothatindividualimmediately
followingthemeeting.
AsauthorizedbySection551.071(2)oftheTexasGovernmentCode,thismeetingmaybeconvened
intoClosedExecutiveSessionforthepurposeofseekingconfidentiallegaladvicefromtheCity
AttorneyonanyAgendaitemslistedherein.
AGENDAMEMO
(9/4/2012AGENDA)
TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil
FROM:GaryW.Adams,ChiefofPolice
SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onrequestfromSMUtotemporarilycloseHillcrestAve.
fromUniversityBlvd.toMockingbirdLn.duringtheirHomecomingparade
BACKGROUND:
TheUniversityParkPoliceDepartmentreceivedaPublicAssemblyapplicationfromSuzanne
MasseyofSouthernMethodistUniversityrequestingHillcrestAve.beclosedtoallthroughtraffic
fromUniversityBlvd.toMockingbirdLn.fortheirhomecomingparadeSaturday,October27,2012,
from10a.m.until12:30p.m.
TheCouncilapprovedthesamerequestlastyearforSMU'scentennialhomecomingparadeandthere
werenoreportedissuesassociatedwiththestreetclosure.AsSMU'scentennialcelebrationswill
continuethrough2015,theUniversityplanstoextendtheircommunityoutreachbyinviting
surroundingneighborhoodresidentstoattendtheparade,andplanstoasknewgroupsto
participate.SMUintendsforthehomecomingparadetocontinuetobeacommunityeventinthe
upcomingyears.
RECOMMENDATION:
StaffrecommendsapprovalofthisrequestprovidedtherequirementsoutlinedbytheUniversityPark
DepartmentofPublicWorksandtheUniversityParkPoliceDepartmentarefollowed.
ATTACHMENTS:
SMUHomecoming2012PublicAssemblyPermitApp
SMUHomecoming2012ParadeRoute
SMUHomecoming2012Letter
AGENDAMEMO
(9/4/2012AGENDA)
TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil
FROM:GaryW.Adams,ChiefofPolice
SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onarequestbySMUKappaAlphaThetaSororityto
conduct5kraceoncertaincitystreets
BACKGROUND:
TheSMUKappaAlphaThetaSororityisconductinga5Kraceandone-mileFunRuntoraisefunds
fortheDallasCourtAppointedSpecialAdvocates(CASA),alocalnon-profitorganizationproviding
volunteerswhoarevoicesforabusedchildrenincourt.
TheproposedrouteissituatedprimarilyonthecampusofSouthernMethodistUniversity,butdoes
includecertainresidentialstreetsthroughUniversityPark.TheFunRunisplannedtostartat7:30
a.m.andthe5Kraceisplannedtostartat8:00a.m.onSaturday,October27th.Theentire
eventisanticipatedtoendby9:30a.m.Theyhopetohave200-300participantsregisteredto
participateinthisevent.
ThePoliceDepartmenthasapprovedtherouteandduetothetimeofday,doesnotanticipateany
trafficrelatedissues.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staffrecommendsapprovaloftherequesttousecertaincitystreetsduringthisrun.
ATTACHMENTS:
SMUThetaRaceRequestLetter
SMUThetaRaceRoute
Jordan Bowles
SMU Theta 5K Chair
August 14, 2012
To whom this may concern,
This document contains the details of the SMU Theta 6th Annual 5K Race. Proceeds go to our national
philanthropy CASA, Court Appointed Special Advocates. Judges appoint Dallas CASA volunteers to
advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children, helping these children have safe,
permanent homes as quickly as possible. Dallas CASA exists so that abused and neglected children in
protective care have the chance to become successful adults. With the help of caring advocates, the
cycle of abuse and neglect will be broken.
The 1 Mile Fun Run begins at 7:30 AM and the 5K starts at 8:30 AM. Most of the routes will be on
campus, as seen in the map. The 5K route is the same as last year’s, which was made by Racing
Systems/Run On. The 1 Mile Fun Run route has been included as well. Run On is the company that
helps us time the race and register participants each year. The race sign up link just became active, so
we do not have any runners that have signed up yet, but we hope to have 200 to 300 runners. We will
be hiring SMU police and the entire sorority will be manning the race, including set up, passing out
water at various places along the race route, and helping to make everything run smoothly. On the next
page is a breakdown of the timing of the race, as well as the additional information that I have
mentioned.
Warm Regards,
Jordan Bowles
jbowles@smu.edu
919.244.7022
Day of Race Plan
6:40 AM: All Girls Arrive At The House
6:50 AM: Start Set Up In Front Of Moody Coliseum
7:00 AM: Vendors And Police Arrive
7:15 AM: All Food And Sign Ins Ready; Sign Ins Begin
7:20 AM: Girls In Their Places On The Route
7:30 AM: 1 Mile Fun Run Begins
8:00 AM: 5K Run Begins
8:55 AM: Awards Begin, If Not Earlier
9:10 AM: Clean Up Begins
9:30 AM: Everything In Front Of Moody Coliseum Is Clean; Vendors Have Left; Event Is Complete
More Information
• The race sign up just became active; No runners have signed up yet
• All proceeds/money raised will be donated to Dallas CASA (Court Appointed Special
Advocates)
• Route made by Racing Systems/Run On; Same route as last year
o Route is mostly on SMU’s campus
• Will be hiring SMU police to work the event; Have contacted them but have not heard
back yet
• All Theta members will be present to man the race
• Contact:
Jordan Bowles
Theta 5K Chair
jbowles@smu.edu
919.244.7022
FO
R
D
ST
A
D
I
U
M
TR
A
C
K
MOODY
SMU THETA RUN COURSE
NOT TO SCALE
CROSS STREETS NOT SHOWN
MARK COURSE WITH CONES
START / FINISH
ON BRICK PEDESTRIAN PORTION OF AIRLINE.
4TH POLE S. OF THE S. EDGE OF MOODY.
ALSO ONE POLE PAST HYDRANT ON THE E. SIDE OF AIRLINE.
WESTMINSTER
START ON BRICK PEDESTRIAN PORTION OF AIRLINE.
SOUTH, TURNING RIGHT (WEST) AROUND THE NORTH OF FORD STADIUM.
SOUTH ON OWNBY DRIVE, (WEST SIDE OF STADIUM) TO SCHLEGEL.
WEST ON SCHLEGEL TO BISHOP. NORTH IN NORTHBOUND LANE OF BISHOP
RIGHT (EAST) ON BINKLEY. BINKELY TO OWNBY. NORTH (LEFT) ON OWNBY.
OWNBY TO DYER. RIGHT (EAST) ON DYER TO AIRLINE.
LEFT (NORTH) ON AIRLINE TO UNIVERSITY.
RIGHT (EAST) ON UNIVERSITY TO DURHAM. LEFT (NORTH) ON DURHAM.
DURHAM TO WESTMINSTER. RIGHT (EAST) ON WESTMINSTER.
RIGHT (SOUTH) ON BOEDECKER TO DANIEL. RIGHT (WEST) ON DANIEL.
DANIEL TO DURHAM. LEFT (SOUTH) ON DURHAM TO UNIVERISTY.
RIGHT ON UNIVERISTY TO AIRLINE.
RETURN TO FINISH USING THE SAME PATH AS THE OUTBOUND.
MILE 1 - ON NORTHBOUND AIRLINE, AT AIRLINE & UNIVERSITY INTERSECTION
MILE 2 - ON SOUTHBOUND DURHAM, AT DURHAM & DANIEL INTERSECTION
MILE 3 - ON PEDESTRIAN AREA OF N. FORD STADIUM, EVEN WITH 2ND,
(EASTERMOST) STADIUM GATE NO. 4
BI
S
H
O
P
BO
E
D
E
C
K
E
R
DU
R
H
A
M
DANIEL
OW
N
B
Y
²DYE
R
SCHLEGEL
UNIVERSITY
BINKLEY AI
R
L
I
N
E
AI
R
L
I
N
E
N
W E
S
1
2
3
AGENDAMEMO
(9/4/2012AGENDA)
TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil
FROM:KentR.Austin,DirectorofFinance
SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onordinanceamendingFY2012budget
BACKGROUND:
TheSeptember4,2012,CityCouncilmeetingagendaincludesanordinanceamendingtheFY2012
(currentyear)budgetby$54,560intheGeneralFund.Thisisthesecondbudgetamendmentof
FY2012;thefirst,datedNovember15,2011,approvedthecarryforwardofencumbrances(open
purchaseorders)fromFY2011.
TheproposednewamendmentwouldincreaseGeneralFundexpendituresby$54,560forthe
followingitems:
1.CommunityDevelopmentDepartment--ProfessionalServicesaccount:$10,000topayfor
transcriptionofBOAChaseBankhearingandformerBuildingOfficialKeithSchmidtcontract
services.
2.EngineeringDepartment--RegularEarningsandFICA/Medicareaccounts:$6900topayfor
summerintern.
3.EngineeringDepartment--ProfessionalServicesaccount:$13,000topayforoutsidetraffic
engineerreviewofYMCAtrafficimpactanalysis.
4.FacilitiesMaintenanceDepartment--RemodelingProjectsaccount:$24,660topayfor
installationcostsofCRAC(ComputerRoomAirConditioning)equipment.
TheincreaseinexpenditureswouldbefundedbyuseoftheGeneralFundfundbalance,whichtotaled
$6,368,312asofAugust29,2012.TheattachedpageshowstheimpactofbothFY2012budget
amendmentsontherelevantfundsanddepartments.
RECOMMENDATION:
ApprovetheordinanceamendingtheFY2012budget.
ATTACHMENTS:
FY2012budgetamendmentno.2summarybyfundanddept
OrdinanceamendingFY2012budget
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS
FY2012 BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 2 BY FUND AND DEPARTMENT
9/4/2012
Fund / Org Unit / Department
FY2012 Adopted
Budget
Budget
Amendment 1:
11/15/2011
Budget
Amendment 2:
9/4/2012
FY2012
Amended
Budget
GENERAL FUND
Revenues
01-11 REVENUES $26,758,000 $0 $0$26,758,000
Total Revenues $26,758,000 $0 $0$26,758,000
Expenditures
01-02 EXECUTIVE $1,187,135 $6,000 $0 $1,193,135
01-03 FINANCE 1,059,604 0 0 1,059,604
01-04 HUMAN RESOURCES 363,849 1,500 0 365,349
01-05 INFORMATION SERVICES 996,662142,269 0 1,138,931
01-10 COURT 331,720 0 0 331,720
01-19 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1,016,899 12,200 10,000 1,039,099
01-20 ENGINEERING 744,212 67,960 19,900 832,072
01-25 TRAFFIC 848,934 82,454 0 931,388
01-35 FACILITY MAINTENANCE 755,293258,319 24,660 1,038,272
01-40 FIRE 4,860,342 87,734 0 4,948,076
01-50 POLICE 6,666,922 30,709 0 6,697,631
01-70 PARKS 2,834,510 22,253 0 2,856,763
01-75 SWIMMING POOL 269,583 0 0 269,583
01-80 STREETS 1,756,234 0 0 1,756,234
01-85 TRANSFERS 3,032,187 0 03,032,187
Total Expenditures $26,724,086$711,398$54,560$27,490,044
General Fund Surplus/(Deficit)$33,914 ($711,398)($54,560)($732,044)
UTILITY FUND
Revenues
02-11 REVENUES $13,445,004 $0 $0$13,445,004
Total Revenues 13,445,004$ $0 $0$13,445,004
Expenditures
02-21 UTILITY OFFICE $7,882,997 $0 $0 $7,882,997
02-22 UTILITIES 3,266,306189,397 0 $3,455,703
02-23 STORM WATER 90,450 65,000 0 $155,450
02-85 TRANSFERS 2,195,415 0 0$2,195,415
Total Expenditures $13,435,168$254,397 $0$13,689,565
Utility Fund Surplus/(Deficit)$9,836 ($254,397)$0 ($244,561)
SANITATION FUND
Revenues
04-11 REVENUES $3,070,451 $0 $0$3,070,451
Total Revenues $3,070,451 $0 $0$3,070,451
Expenditures
04-60 SANITATION $2,868,476$18,131 $0$2,886,607
Total Expenditures $2,868,476$18,131 $0$2,886,607
Sanitation Fund Surplus/(Deficit)$201,975 ($18,131)$0$183,844
TOTAL REVENUES $43,273,455 $0 $0$43,273,455
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 43,027,730$983,926$54,560$44,066,216
TOTAL SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)$245,725 ($983,926)($54,560)($792,761)
C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\Agenda.2556.1.Ordinance 2 amending FY2012 budget
09042012.docx 12:57 PM 08/31/12
ORDINANCE NO. ______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS,
AMENDING THE 2011-2012 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET, ORDINANCE NO. 11-20, TO
APPROPRIATE $54,560 FROM THE GENERAL FUND UNRESERVED FUND
BALANCE BY INCREASING EXPENDITURES $54,560; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of University Park has determined that it is in
the public interest to amend Ordinance No. 11-20 to transfer funds from unreserved fund
balance of the General Fund into specific accounts;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 11-20, the 2011-2012 fiscal year budget ordinance
of the City of University Park, Texas, be, and the same is hereby, amended to appropriate
unreserved fund balances of $54,560 from the general fund by increasing expenditures $54,560
in the specific accounts listed on Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made part hereof for all
purposes, and such expenditures are herby authorized and made a part of the 2011-2012 fiscal
year budget of the City.
SECTION 2. This ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage,
as the law and Charter in such cases provide.
DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of University Park, Texas, on the 4th
day of September, 2012.
APPROVED:
____________________________________
W. RICHARD DAVIS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\Agenda.2556.1.Ordinance 2 amending FY2012 budget
09042012.docx 12:57 PM 08/31/12
____________________________________
ELIZABETH SPECTOR, CITY
SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________
CITY ATTORNEY
C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\Agenda.2556.1.Ordinance 2 amending FY2012 budget
09042012.docx 12:57 PM 08/31/12
ACCOUNT
NUMBERACCOUNT DESCRIPTIONAMOUNT DESCRIPTION
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
1.
TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUES -$
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
1.01-19-3060Professional services 10,000 Transcription service (BOA Chase Bank) and Keith Schmidt
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT10,000
ENGINEERING
2.01-20-1001Regular earnings 6,400Summer engineering intern
3.01-20-1110FICA/Medicare 500Summer engineering intern
4.01-20-3060Professional services 13,000Traffic impact analysis study--proposed YMCA expansion
TOTAL ENGINEERING 19,900
FACILITY MAINTENANCE
5.01-35-9950Remodeling projects 24,660Completion of CRAC units install (computer room)
TOTAL FACILITY MAINTENANCE 24,660
TOTAL GEN. FUND EXPENDITURES54,560$
FUND BALANCE INCREASE/(DECREASE)(54,560)$
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS
FY2012 BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 2
9/4/2012
AGENDAMEMO
(9/4/2012AGENDA)
TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil
FROM:KenIrvin,Sr.NetworkAdministrator
SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onthepurchaseofreplacementequipmentforbackup
dispatchcenter
BACKGROUND:
InMarchandApril2007,theCitypurchasedequipmenttosupportthebackupdispatchcenter
andPoliceDepartmentoperationsatthePeekServiceCenter.Thepurposeofthisfacilitywasboth
tohousethesecriticaloperationswhileCityHallwasremodeledandtoserveasabackupdispatch
centerintheeventofamajoremergency.Thedispatchcenteriscomprisedoftwoconsoles
containingfivecomputerseach,anadditionaldisplaycomputerforsecurity,mapping,orother
situationalawarenessmaterial,andbackup911andradiosystems.
Muchofthisequipmenthasatenyearorgreaterlifespan.Some,however,hasafiveyearlifespan
andnowneedstobereplaced.Theitemsneedingreplacementare:1)elevendesktopcomputersand
theirsupportingLCDmonitors,2)NICERecordingSystemHardwareandSoftware,and3)Console
furniturecabling.
RECOMMENDATION:
Replacingtheseitemswillallowustocontinueprovidingexcellentservicetothecommunityevenin
theeventofafailureattheCityHallcenter.Staffreccomendsreplacementoftheindicated
equipment.
FUNDINGSOURCE:
AllitemsproposedforreplacementaredefinedintheCapitalProjectsbudgetasprojectnumber
14300.Thecostandintendedpurchasingvehicleforeachitemisoutlinedbelow:
1.11DesktopComputers-$15,075.70-DellComputersSoleSource
2.NICELoggerApplianceandSoftware-$42,386.00-TXDIRContractNumberDIRSDD1736
3.CablingofConsoleFurniture-$770.00-MediaManagementProfessionalServices
AGENDAMEMO
(9/4/2012AGENDA)
TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil
FROM:GeneR.Smallwood,P.E.;DirectorofPublicWorks
SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onaproposalfromR.L.GoodsonConsultingEngineersto
developacomprehensivestormwaterdrainagemapreport
BACKGROUND:
TheCitydevelopedaStormwaterManagementPlanin2008and,asrequired,submittedacopytothe
TexasCommissiononEnvironmentQuality(TCEQ).TheSMPidentifiesnumerousoperational
controlmeasuresandmanagementpracticesthatwillhaveapositiveimpactonwaterqualityasit
dischargesintodrainageinlets,stormsewers,andwatercoursesintheCity.TheCityfilesanannual
reportwiththeTCEQtoaffirmthateachofthesixtyrequiredtasksdetailedintheSMPhasbeen
accomplished.
Oneofthekeytasksyettobecompletedisthedevelopmentofadetailedstormwatercollection
systemmap.RLGhasdonetwopriorphasesofthemapping,leavingthelast,andbyfarthelargest
sectiontobedoneviathisproposal.Thecostfortheworkisdetailedat$200,500.
FundingfortheproposedworkisavailablefromtheUtilityFund(StormwaterBudget).
RECOMMENDATION:
StaffrecommendsCityCouncilapprovaloftheR.L.Goodsonproposalintheamountof$200,500for
developingacomprehensivestormwatersystemmappingreport,subjectdeletionofthe"limitof
liability"clause,andauthorizetheCityManagertoexecuteacontractforthework.
FUNDINGSOURCE:
UTILITYFUND(Stormwater)
ProfessionalServices02.23.3060
ATTACHMENTS:
RLGProposal
AGENDAMEMO
(9/4/2012AGENDA)
TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil
FROM:GeneR.Smallwood,P.E.;DirectorofPublicWorks
SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onaproposalfromFreese&Nicholstoconducthydraulic
modelingoftheUniversityPark-HighlandParksharedsanitarysewertrunkmain
BACKGROUND:
A30-inchsanitarysewertrunkmainrunssouthfromMcFarlinthroughtheDallasCountryCluband
HighlandParktoapointalongTurtleCreek,nearWycliff,whereitconnectstoDallasWaterUtilities'
collectionsystem.ThesewerprovidesserviceformostofUniversityParkandHighlandPark.
Followingseveralyearsofdiscussionsregardingownershipandoperationofthe30-inchsanitary
sewer,theCityCouncilapprovedaninterlocalagreement(ILA)withHighlandParkon12-15-2010.
Oneoftheprovisionsofthecontractrequiresthatthetwocitiesworktowardsolutionstoreduce
infiltration-inflowandeliminateoverflows,particularlythosethathaveoccurredduringsignificant
rainfalleventsneartheintersectionofLakesideandArmstrong.Tothatend,aproposalwassolicited
fromFreeseandNichols,engineeringconsultants,todevelopahydraulicmodelofthe30-inchmain.
Thisanalysisshouldprovideinsightintowhatcapitalimprovementsand/ormaintenance
activitiesmaybenecessaryinaccomplishingthegoalsidentifiedintheILA.
Acopyoftheproposalisattachedtothismemo.The$65,000infeesfortheengineeringservicesis
proposedtobesharedbytheCityandtheTown.Logistically,staffisrecommendingthatUniversity
ParkenterintothecontractandHighlandParkwillreimbursetheCityforitsshareoftheengineering
costs.
RECOMMENDATION:
StaffrecommendsCityCouncilapprovaloftheFreese&Nicholsproposalintheamountof$65,000
(withHighlandParkpayingfiftypercent),andauthorizetheCityManagertoexecuteacontractfor
thework.FundsfortheprojectareidentifiedintheCapitalProjectsFund.
FUNDINGSOURCE:
CAPITALPROJECTSFUND
AcctNo42.42.4430
ProjectNo49270.2100
ATTACHMENTS:
F-NPROPOSAL
30-InchSewerMap
August 15, 2012
Bud Smallwood, P.E. Meran Dadgostar, P.E., R.S.
Public Works Director Town Engineer
City of University Park, Texas Town of Highland Park, Texas
3800 University Blvd. 4300 MacArthur Ave., Suite 265B
University Park, Texas 75205 Highland Park, Texas 75209
Re: Agreement for Hydraulic Analysis for 30-Inch Turtle Creek Sewer Interceptor
Dear Mr. Smallwood and Mr. Dadgostar:
In response to our meeting with you on July 18, 2012 regarding the issues the City of University Park and
the Town of Highland Park are experiencing with the 30-inch Turtle Creek sewer interceptor, we are
pleased to submit this proposal for providing professional engineering services to the City of University
Park and the Town of Highland Park. We understand that this is a joint project for the City of University
Park and the Town of Highland Park, but that our contract will be with the City of University Park.
Specifically, we propose to provide the following Scope of Services:
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Project Intent: The City of University Park and the Town of Highland Park share a 30-inch sanitary sewer
interceptor in Turtle Creek. The interceptor and associated siphons were originally constructed in the
1930s and flow from this interceptor is received by Dallas Water Utilities (DWU) through a meter south of
Wycliff Avenue. The interceptor has historically experienced sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs)
immediately upstream of the siphon on Armstrong Avenue during rain events.
This scope of work will consist of a review of permanent flow meter data (for both the City and Town) and
drainage basin contributing areas to develop wastewater flow assumptions for the interceptor. This analysis
will consist of developing projected flows for each individual wastewater line in Highland Park and
University Park that contributes to the 30-inch Turtle Creek interceptor by defining the contributing sub-
basin area and calculating resulting wastewater flows. This scope of services will also consist of
development of an InfoWorks CS sanitary sewer model of the Turtle Creek interceptor and contributing
sub-basins from McFarlin Avenue to the DWU Point of Entry. Recent survey data collected by C&P
Engineering will be utilized for model development. The model will be calibrated to a historical wet
weather event, develop a hydraulic grade profile for existing conditions, and used to evaluate improvement
alternatives to reduce the potential for SSOs. The assumptions, analysis, and recommendations will be
summarized in a technical report.
Page 2
Our proposed schedule for this effort is 90 calendar days from Notice to Proceed. Every effort will be
made to complete these services in a timely manner, as we know the importance of this project to the City
and the Town. We believe that the meetings outlined in the Scope of Services will be necessary to ensure
adequate communication and buy-in from all stakeholders. However, we have structured this proposal as
a not-to-exceed contract so that if, during the course of the project, it is determined that one or more of the
progress meetings are not necessary, the City and Town will not be charged for these meetings. In
addition, meetings will be attended only by necessary FNI personnel and will be productive in nature
consisting of necessary project interaction, presentation and discussion of results, input from all
stakeholders, decision-making, and determination of a path forward.
1. Project Kick-Off Meeting: Freese and Nichols, Inc. (FNI) will meet with the Town of Highland
Park (Town) and the City of University Park (City) to review project goals, scope, team, schedule,
and data requirements.
2. Data Collection and Review: FNI will compile and review information from the Town and City
related to the 30-inch Turtle Creek sewer line including GIS files, drawings, flow data, CCTV data,
previous reports, survey data collected by C&P Engineering, and any other pertinent data.
3. Review Permanent Flow Metering Data and Develop Wastewater Flows: FNI will review web-
based wastewater flow data for the four permanent flow meters to develop typical average dry
weather and peak wet weather wastewater flows. FNI will use available data to identify
contributing areas and quantify infiltration and inflow allowances and flows from wastewater lines
that flow into the 30-inch turtle Creek interceptor. FNI will develop weekday and weekend diurnal
patterns.
4. Construct Model of 30-inch line and Contributing Sub-basins: FNI will construct a hydraulic model
of the 30-inch Turtle Creek sewer line in InfoWorks CS software (by Innovyze) using GIS
mapping, survey data, as-built drawings, schematics, and other available data. Flow from
contributing sub-basins and entry points along the 30-inch line will be represented in the model.
Wastewater lines, siphons, manholes, and other structures will be included in the model. FNI will
perform a one-day site visit to view the configuration and layout of critical structures on the 30-
inch Turtle Creek sewer line.
5. Coordination meeting with Dallas Water Utilities (DWU): FNI will attend one coordination
meeting with DWU to collect data and discuss assumptions related to the HGL/flows at the DWU
connection point and planned downstream improvements.
6. Calibrate InfoWorks CS Model to Existing Conditions: FNI will calibrate the InfoWorks CS model
to a selected recent rainfall event using on-line flow metering and rainfall gage data by comparing
model output to recorded values for flow, depth, and velocity.
7. Progress Meeting – Wastewater Flows and Model Calibration: FNI will meet with the Town and
City to review wastewater flows and model calibration.
8. Hydraulic Analysis for Existing Dry Weather and Peak Wet Weather Flow Conditions: FNI will
run the InfoWorks model under existing dry weather and wet weather flow conditions for a 5-year
6-hour design storm to develop HGL profiles of the 30-inch Turtle Creek sewer interceptor. FNI
will review model output to identify areas where the HGL may be higher than the ground elevation,
indicating a potential capacity restriction. FNI will develop an HGL profile graph and mapping.
Page 3
9. Evaluate Improvement Alternatives: FNI will utilize the InfoWorks CS model to evaluate up to
three (3) separate improvement alternatives to address problem areas and improve the hydraulic
capacity of the 30-inch Turtle Creek interceptor. Improvement alternatives will provide the
necessary capacity to handle flows from a 5-year 6-hour storm event with no overflows. The
improvement alternative will be evaluated with and without planned downstream improvements in
DWU’s system.
10. Progress Meeting – Hydraulic Analysis and Improvement Alternatives: FNI will meet with the
Town and City to review the results of the hydraulic modeling and improvement alternatives
analysis.
11. Develop Cost Estimates: FNI will develop planning level cost estimates for the three improvements
alternatives including construction, contingency, and engineering/survey costs.
12. Develop Draft Report: FNI will develop a draft report that summarizes the assumptions,
methodology, results, and recommendation of the hydraulic analysis. FNI will submit the draft
report in electronic PDF format.
13. Progress Meeting – Review Draft Report: FNI will meet with the Town and City to review the draft
report and solicit comments from Town and City staff.
14. Develop Final Report: FNI will incorporate Town and City comments and finalize the report. FNI
will deliver an electronic PDF copy and ten (10) hard copies of the report.
ADDITIONAL SERVICES: Additional Services to be performed by FNI, if authorized by OWNER,
which are not included in the above described basic services, shall be computed based on a negotiated fee.
TIME OF COMPLETION
FNI is authorized to commence work on the Project upon execution of this Agreement and agrees to
complete the services within 90 calendar days of Notice to Proceed.
If FNI’s services are delayed through no fault of FNI, FNI shall be entitled to equitable adjustment of
compensation and FNI shall be entitled to adjust contract schedule consistent with the number of days of
delay.
RESPONSIBILITIES OF CLIENT
Client will perform the following in a timely manner so as not to delay the services of FNI:
A. Designate in writing a person to act as Client’s representative with respect to the services to be
rendered under this Agreement. Such person shall have contract authority to transmit instructions,
receive information, interpret and define Client’s policies and decisions with respect to FNI’s
services for the Project.
B. Assist FNI by placing at FNI’s disposal all available information pertinent to the Project including
previous reports and any other data relative to the Project.
Page 4
C. Arrange for access to and make all provisions for FNI to enter upon public and private property as
required for FNI to perform services under this Agreement.
D. Examine all studies, reports, sketches, drawings, specifications, proposals and other documents
presented by FNI, obtain advice of an attorney, insurance counselor and other consultants as Client
deems appropriate for such examination and render in writing decisions pertaining thereto within a
reasonable time so as not to delay the services of FNI.
E. Provide such accounting, independent cost estimating and insurance counseling services as may be
required for the Project, such legal services as Client may require or FNI may reasonably request
with regard to legal issues pertaining to the Project.
DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES
FNI and CLIENT designate the following representatives:
CITY’s Designated Representative: Bud Smallwood, P.E., 3800 University Blvd, University Park, Texas
75205; Phone 214-987-5400; email bsmallwood@uptexas.org
CITY’s Accounting Representative:
FNI’s Designated Representative: Scott Cole, P.E., 1701 N. Market St., Suite 500, Dallas, Texas, 75202;
Phone 817-735-7255; Fax 817-735-7492; email sac@freese.com
FNI’s Accounting Representative: Jana Collier, 4055 International Plaza, Ste. 200, Fort Worth, Texas
76109; Phone 817-735-7354; Fax 817-735-7496; email jvc@freese.com
COMPENSATION
FNI proposes to furnish our services as described herein in accordance with Attachment CO,
“Compensation”. The total fee for Basic Services shall be computed on the basis of Attachment CO but
shall be a not-to-exceed fee of:
• Project Kick-Off Meeting (Task 1): $ 1,300
• Data Collection and Review (Task 2): $ 3,200
• Review Metering Data and Develop Flows (Task 3): $ 5,700
• Construct Model (Task 4): $ 9,400
• Meeting with Dallas Water Utilities (DWU) (Task 5): $ 1,300
• Calibrate InfoWorks CS Model (Task 6): $ 6,800
• Progress Meeting –Flows and Calibration (Task 7): $ 1,300
• Hydraulic Analysis (Task 8): $ 7,900
• Evaluate Improvement Alternatives (Task 9): $11,000
• Progress Meeting –Improvement Alternatives (Task 10): $ 1,300
• Develop Cost Estimates (Task 11): $ 4,400
• Develop Draft Report (Task 12): $ 5,900
• Progress Meeting – Review Draft Report (Task 13): $ 1,300
• Develop Final Report (Task 14): $ 4,200
• Total Fee Not to Exceed: $65,000
Page 5
If FNI sees the Scope of Services changing so that additional services are needed, FNI will notify the City’s
representative for approval before proceeding. Additional services shall be computed based on the
Schedule of Charges found in Attachment CO.
Payment of the services shall be due and payable upon submission of a statement for services. Statements
for services shall not be submitted more frequently than monthly.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT
We propose to furnish our services as described herein in accordance with Attachment TC, "Terms and
Conditions of Agreement".
We appreciate this opportunity to submit this proposal. If additional information or clarification is desired,
please do not hesitate to contact us. If you are in agreement with the services described above and wish for
us to proceed with this assignment, please sign below and return one copy of the agreement for our files.
L:\Resources\cbs\U\University Park\Hyland Park Hydraulic Analysis Turtle Crk\Let Agree 08-15-12
Yours very truly,
Approved:
FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC. City of University Park
Brian Coltharp, P.E.
Principal By: _________
Name:________________________________
Print or Type
Scott Cole, P.E.
Principal Title: _________
Date: ________________________________
ATTACHMENT CO
Min Max Position Min Max
163.98 412.27 3D VISUALIZATION COORDINATOR 141.53 174.83
186.77 295.88 O&G ENGINEER VI 216.36 288.00
256.97 271.48 O&G ENGINEER V 199.12 209.52
227.81 255.26 O&G ENGINEER II 101.22 136.95
168.41 231.34 O&G ENGINEER - TRANSITION 172.73 176.87
143.42 188.50 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST VII 182.92 231.88
121.86 167.26 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST VI 179.14 179.14
109.04 135.79 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST V 126.62 161.79
102.02 116.68 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST IV 111.06 156.20
97.74 111.10 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST III 80.35 126.65
181.24 223.89 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST II 84.10 91.66
165.46 172.44 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST I 66.89 82.08
129.42 147.46 ARCHITECT VI 162.83 190.91
108.81 134.42 ARCHITECT V 133.30 172.51
91.72 113.30 ARCHITECT IV 131.62 134.64
86.02 106.26 ARCHITECT III 111.72 134.72
172.86 213.53 ARCHITECT II 90.82 112.19
141.92 175.32 ARCHITECT I 74.48 92.01
136.51 168.63 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT V 126.75 156.57
101.62 131.51 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT INTERN II 89.10 91.19
94.40 116.61 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT INTERN I 62.84 81.32
87.91 108.60 PLANNER VII 194.00 239.65
178.61 220.64 PLANNER VI 177.48 215.64
116.25 143.60 PLANNER V 133.16 172.32
134.88 174.56 PLANNER IV 113.72 123.59
107.46 115.42 PLANNER III 94.18 104.47
68.02 84.03 PLANNER II 77.74 100.60
156.28 216.58 PLANNER I 71.05 87.77
122.15 166.90 HYDROLOGIST VI 164.63 203.36
101.52 148.68 HYDROLOGIST V 116.43 143.83
89.28 128.88 HYDROLOGIST IV 115.52 124.02
79.63 97.81 HYDROLOGIST III 93.45 120.94
DOCUMENT CONTROL SPECIALIST II 99.94 102.49 HYDROLOGIST II 85.10 105.12
57.74 62.75 SENIOR GEOLOGIST 115.70 142.92
144.00 190.37 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER VI 186.26 230.09
129.42 161.71 RIGHT OF WAY AGENT 86.05 106.29
112.73 139.26 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT COORDINATOR 61.38 121.93
149.08 158.98 WORD PROCESSING/SECRETARIAL 55.48 106.38
107.28 148.64 OPERATIONS ANALYST 113.44 152.75
91.26 127.30 CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR 82.33 84.56
75.35 94.21 PROJECT CONTROL SPECIALIST 75.96 81.72
64.01 89.89 INFORMATION SERVICES CLERK III 51.41 63.50
55.60 71.96 INFORMATION SERVICES CLERK II 40.54 52.92
126.68 135.94 INFORMATION SERVICES CLERK I 40.32 40.32
110.02 132.59 CO-OP 28.80 71.14
82.15 108.14
71.78 76.28
55.55 71.89
RATES FOR INHOUSE SERVICES
Computer and CAD Calcomp Plotter Print Shop
PC CAD Stations $10.00 per hr.Bond $2.50 per plot Color Copies & Printing $0.50 per single side copy
Other $5.00 per plot $1.00 per double side copy
Color $5.75 per plot
Black & White Copies & Printing $0.10 per single side copy
Testing Apparatus $0.20 per double side copy
Density Meter $700.00 per month
Gas Detection $20.00 per test Binding $5.75 per book
FNI
ggp0360:3/7/2012 OWNER
GIS ANALYST V
GIS ANALYST IV
GIS ANALYST III
GIS ANALYST II
GIS ANALYST I
The ranges and individual salaries will be adjusted annually.
PRINICIPAL
GROUP MANAGER
ENGINEER VIII
ENGINEER VI
ENGINEER V
PROGRAM MANAGER I
ELECTRICAL ENGINEER II
ELECTRICAL ENGINEER I
ELECTRICAL ENGINEER VI
ELECTRICAL ENGINEER III
MECHANICAL ENGINEER III
MECHANICAL ENGINEER II
MECHANICAL ENGINEER IV
MECHANICAL ENGINEER I
PROGRAM MANAGER II
Schedule of Charges:
ENGINEER IV
ENGINEER III
ELECTRICAL ENGINEER IV
COMPENSATION
ENGINEER VII
ENGINEER II
ENGINEER I
ELECTRICAL ENGINEER V
TECHNICIAN I
Position
TECHNICIAN II
TECHNICIAN IV
TECHNICIAN III
SR DESIGNER
DESIGNER II
DESIGNER I
SR CADD DESIGNER
CADD DESIGNER
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT ADMIN III
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT ADMIN II
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT ADMIN I
DOCUMENT CONTROL SPECIALIST
MECHANICAL ENGINEER VI
MECHANICAL ENGINEER V
CONSTRUCTION MANAGER V
CONSTRUCTION MANAGER IV
CONSTRUCTION MANAGER III
CONSTRUCTION MANAGER II
CONSTRUCTION MANAGER I
OTHER DIRECT EXPENSES:
Other direct expenses are reimbursed at actual cost times a multiplier of 1.15. They include outside printing and reproduction expense, communication expense,
travel, transportation and subsistence away from the FNI office and other miscellaneous expenses directly related to the work, including costs of laboratory analysis,
test, and other work required to be done by independent persons other than staff members. For Resident Representative services performed by non-FNI employees
and CAD services performed In-house by non-FNI employees where FNI provides workspace and equipment to perform such services, these services will be billed at
cost times a multiplier of 2.0. This markup approximates the cost to FNI if an FNI employee was performing the same or similar services.
Not to Exceed: The total fee for Basic Services in Attachment SC shall be computed on the basis of the Schedule of Charges, but shall not exceed
Sixty Five Thousand Dollars ($65,000.00). If FNI sees the Scope of Services changing so that Additional Services are needed, including but not
limited to those services described as Additional Services in Attachment SC, FNI will notify OWNER for OWNER's approval before proceeding.
Additional Services shall be computed based on the Schedule of Charges.
Page 1of 2
FNI__________
OWNER__________
10-25-07 ATTACHMENT TC
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT
1. DEFINITIONS: The term Owner as used herein refers to the City of University Park, Texas . The term FNI as used
herein refers to Freese and Nichols, Inc., its employees and agents; also its subcontractors and their employees and agents. As
used herein, Services refers to the professional services performed by Freese and Nichols pursuant to the AGREEMENT.
2. CHANGES: Owner, without invalidating the AGREEMENT, may order changes within the general scope of the WORK
required by the AGREEMENT by altering, adding to and/or deducting from the WORK to be performed. If any change under
this clause causes an increase or decrease in FNI's cost of, or the time required for, the performance of any part of the Services
under the AGREEMENT, an equitable adjustment will be made by mutual agreement and the AGREEMENT modified in
writing accordingly.
3. TERMINATION: The obligation to provide services under this AGREEMENT may be terminated by either party upon ten
days' written notice. In the event of termination, FNI will be paid for all services rendered and reimbursable expenses incurred
to the date of termination and, in addition, all reimbursable expenses directly attributable to termination.
4. CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES: In no event shall FNI or its subcontractors be liable in contract, tort, strict liability,
warranty, or otherwise for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages, such as loss of product, loss of use of the
equipment or system, loss of anticipated profits or revenue, non-operation or increased expense of operation or other
equipment or systems.
5. INFORMATION FURNISHED BY OWNER: Owner will assist FNI by placing at FNI's disposal all available information
pertinent to the Project including previous reports and any other data relative to design or construction of the Project. FNI
shall have no liability for defects or negligence in the Services attributable to FNI's reliance upon or use of data, design
criteria, drawings, specifications or other information furnished by Owner and Owner agrees to indemnify and hold FNI
harmless from any and all claims and judgments, and all losses, costs and expenses arising therefrom. FNI shall disclose to
Owner, prior to use thereof, defects or omissions in the data, design criteria, drawings, specifications or other information
furnished by Owner to FNI that FNI may reasonably discover in its review and inspection thereof.
6. INSURANCE: FNI shall provide to Owner certificates of insurance which shall contain the following minimum coverage
(All limits in thousands):
Commercial General Liability Workers' Compensation
General Aggregate $2,000 Each Accident $500
Automobile Liability (Any Auto) Professional Liability
CSL $1,000 $3,000 Annual Aggregate
7. SUBCONTRACTS: If, for any reason, at any time during the progress of providing Services, Owner determines that any
subcontractor for FNI is incompetent or undesirable, Owner will notify FNI accordingly and FNI shall take immediate steps for
cancellation of such subcontract. Subletting by subcontractors shall be subject to the same regulations. Nothing contained in
the AGREEMENT shall create any contractual relation between any subcontractor and Owner.
8. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS: All drawings, reports data and other project information developed in the execution of
the Services provided under this AGREEMENT shall be the property of the Owner upon payment of FNI's fees for services.
FNI may retain copies for record purposes. Owner agrees such documents are not intended or represented to be suitable for
reuse by Owner or others. Any reuse by Owner or by those who obtained said documents from Owner without written
verification or adaptation by FNI will be at Owner's sole risk and without liability or legal exposure to FNI, or to FNI's
independent associates or consultants, and Owner shall indemnify and hold harmless FNI and FNI's independent associates and
consultants from all claims, damages, losses and expenses including attorneys' fees arising out of or resulting therefrom. Any
such verification or adaptation will entitle FNI to further reasonable compensation. FNI may reuse all drawings, report data
and other project information in the execution of the Services provided under this AGREEMENT in FNI's other activities.
Any reuse by FNI will be at FNI's sole risk and without liability or legal exposure to Owner, and FNI shall indemnify and hold
harmless Owner from all claims, damages, losses and expenses including attorneys' fees arising out of or resulting therefrom.
Page 2of 2
FNI__________
OWNER__________
9. POLLUTANTS AND HAZARDOUS WASTES: It is understood and agreed that FNI has neither created nor contributed to
the creation or existence of any hazardous, radioactive, toxic, irritant, pollutant, or otherwise dangerous substance or condition
at the site, if any, and its compensation hereunder is in no way commensurate with the potential risk of injury or loss that may
be caused by exposures to such substances or conditions. The parties agree that in performing the Services required by this
AGREEMENT, FNI does not take possession or control of the subject site, but acts as an invitee in performing the services,
and is not therefore responsible for the existence of any pollutant present on or migrating from the site. Further, FNI shall have
no responsibility for any pollutant during clean-up, transportation, storage or disposal activities.
10. OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS: FNI will furnish an opinion of probable project development cost based on present
day cost, but does not guarantee the accuracy of such estimates. Opinions of probable cost, financial evaluations, feasibility
studies, economic analyses of alternate solutions and utilitarian considerations of operations and maintenance costs prepared
by FNI hereunder will be made on the basis of FNI’s experience and qualifications and represent FNI's judgment as an
experienced and qualified design professional. It is recognized, however, that FNI does not have control over the cost of labor,
material, equipment or services furnished by others or over market conditions or contractors' methods of determining their
prices.
11. CONSTRUCTION REPRESENTATION: If required by the AGREEMENT, FNI will furnish Construction Representation
according to the defined scope for these services. FNI will observe the progress and the quality of work to determine in
general if the work is proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents. In performing these services, FNI will endeavor
to protect Owner against defects and deficiencies in the work of Contractors; FNI will report any observed deficiencies to
Owner, however, it is understood that FNI does not guarantee the Contractor's performance, nor is FNI responsible for the
supervision of the Contractor's operation and employees. FNI shall not be responsible for the means, methods, techniques,
sequences or procedures of construction selected by the Contractor, or the safety precautions and programs incident to the
work of the Contractor. FNI shall not be responsible for the acts or omissions of any person (except his own employees or
agent) at the Project site or otherwise performing any of the work of the Project. If Owner designates a person to serve in the
capacity of Resident Project Representative who is not a FNI's employee or FNI's agent, the duties, responsibilities and
limitations of authority of such Resident Project Representative(s) will be set forth in writing and made a part of this
AGREEMENT before the Construction Phase of the Project begins.
12. PAYMENT: Progress payments may be requested by FNI based on the amount of services completed. Payment for the
services of FNI shall be due and payable upon submission of a statement for services to OWNER and in acceptance of the
services as satisfactory by the OWNER. Statements for services shall not be submitted more frequently than monthly. Any
applicable new taxes imposed upon services, expenses, and charges by any governmental body after the execution of this
AGREEMENT will be added to FNI's compensation.
If OWNER fails to make any payment due FNI for services and expenses within thirty (30) days after receipt of FNI's
statement for services therefore, the amounts due FNI will be increased at the rate of one percent (1%) per month from said
thirtieth (30th) day, and, in addition, FNI may, after giving seven (7) days' written notice to OWNER, suspend services under
this AGREEMENT until FNI has been paid in full, all amounts due for services, expenses and charges.
13. ARBITRATION: No arbitration arising out of, or relating to, this AGREEMENT involving one party to this AGREEMENT
may include the other party to this AGREEMENT without their approval.
14. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNMENTS: OWNER and FNI each are hereby bound and the partners, successors, executors,
administrators and legal representatives of OWNER and FNI are hereby bound to the other party to this AGREEMENT and to
the partners, successors, executors, administrators and legal representatives (and said assigns) of such other party, in respect of
all covenants, agreements and obligations of this AGREEMENT.
Neither OWNER nor FNI shall assign, sublet or transfer any rights under or interest in (including, but without limitation,
moneys that may become due or moneys that are due) this AGREEMENT without the written consent of the other, except to
the extent that any assignment, subletting or transfer is mandated by law or the effect of this limitation may be restricted by
law. Unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment, no assignment will release or discharge
the assignor from any duty or responsibility under this AGREEMENT. Nothing contained in this paragraph shall prevent FNI
from employing such independent associates and consultants as FNI may deem appropriate to assist in the performance of
services hereunder.
15. PURCHASE ORDERS: If a Purchase Order is used to authorize FNI's Services, only the terms, conditions/instructions typed
on the face of the Purchase Order shall apply to this AGREEMENT. Should there be any conflict between the Purchase Order
and the terms of this AGREEMENT, then this AGREEMENT shall prevail and shall be determinative of the conflict.
AGENDAMEMO
(9/4/2012AGENDA)
TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil
FROM:JacobSpeer,AssistantDirectorofPublicWorks
SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onaresolutionapprovinganinterlocalagreementwith
DallasCountyforparticipationintheirHouseholdHazardousWasteprogram
BACKGROUND:
TheDallasCountyHouseholdHazardousWasteDisposalProgramwasinitiatedin1994.Citizensof
UniversityParkhaveusedtheHomeChemicalCollectionCenter(locatedat11232PlanoRoad)to
disposeoftheirpaint,herbicides,pesticides,etc.UniversityPark’sannualcontributiontotheprogram
isfundedasa$25,000expenditurefromtheproposedSanitationDivisionFY2013Budget.
RECOMMENDATION:
StaffrecommendsCityCouncilapprovalofaresolutionauthorizingtheCityManagertoexecutean
InterlocalAgreementwithDallasCountytocoordinateaCountywideHouseholdHazardousWaste
DisposalProgram.
FUNDINGSOURCE:
Sanitationfundoperatingbudget
ATTACHMENTS:
ProposedResolutionandILA
RESOLUTION NO. _________________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY
PARK, TEXAS, APPROVING A HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE INTERLOCAL
AGREEMENT WITH DALLAS COUNTY AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the County of Dallas coordinates and implements a Household Hazardous
Waste Network for the collection and disposal of household hazardous waste; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to join the Network to provide the City’s
residents with a means of disposal of such waste; now therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY
PARK, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the “Household Hazardous Waste Interlocal Agreement 2013”, a
true copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and made part hereof for all purposes, is
accepted and approved in all respects by the City Council to provide disposal facilities for the
City’s residents for Household Hazardous Waste. That the City Manager is authorized and
directed to execute such Agreement on behalf of the City of University Park and to take such
other administrative steps as may be necessary to participate in the Network.
SECTION 2. This Resolution shall take effect immediately from and after its passage,
and it is accordingly so resolved.
DULY PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY
PARK, TEXAS, on the ____ day of ____________ 2012.
APPROVED:
_______________________________
W. RICHARD DAVIS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________________________
ELIZABETH SPECTOR, CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________
CITY ATTORNEY (RLD/08-29-12; 57089)
EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT A
AGENDAMEMO
(9/4/2012AGENDA)
TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil
FROM:LizSpector
SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onminutesoftheAugust28,2012CityCouncilMeeting
BACKGROUND:
MinutesoftheAugust28,2012CityCouncilMeetingareincludedfortheCouncil'sapproval.
ATTACHMENTS:
Aug28,2012CCMtgMin
MINUTES
AGENDA #2844
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS
COUNCIL CHAMBER – CITY HALL
TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 2012, 5:00 P.M.
4:00 - 5:00 P.M. WORK SESSION FOR AGENDA REVIEW: THE COUNCIL MET IN OPEN
WORK SESSION TO RECEIVE AGENDA ITEM BRIEFINGS FROM STAFF. NO
BUSINESS WAS CONDUCTED. 2ND FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM, CITY HALL.
The City Council Meeting was called into session at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at City
Hall. Present were Councilmember Stewart, Mayor Pro Tem Clark, Mayor Davis, Councilmember
Moore, and Councilmember Begert. Also in attendance were City Manager Livingston, and City
Attorney Dillard.
Mayor Davis asked the Boy Scouts in attendance to come to the front and assist in leading
the Pledge of Allegiance. The scouts included: Nathan Smith, Troop 70, Communications
merit badge; Michael Cochran, Troop 70, Communications merit badge; and, Nick
Chapman, Troop 518, Communications merit badge.
Staff in attendance included: Assistant Director of Public Works Jacob Speer, Chief
Planning Official Harry Persaud, Director of Finance Kent Austin, Assistant to the City
Manager George Ertle, Director of Human Resources Luanne Hanford, Director of Parks
Gerry Bradley, City Secretary Liz Spector, Director of Public Works Bud Smallwood,
Director of Community Development Robbie Corder, Fire Chief Randy Howell, Director of
Information Services Jim Criswell, and, Community Information Officer Steve Mace.
Councilmember Stewart made a motion to approve the Consent Agenda. Mayor Pro Tem Clark
seconded, and the motion carried unanimously.
I. CALL TO ORDER
A. INVOCATION: Assistant to the City Manager George Ertle
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Assistant to the City Manager George Ertle / Boy Scouts
C. INTRODUCTION OF COUNCIL: Mayor W. Richard Davis
D. INTRODUCTION OF STAFF: City Manager Bob Livingston
II. CONSENT AGENDA
A. CONSIDER AND ACT: on minutes of the August 21, 2012 City Council Meeting
III. MAIN AGENDA
A. REPORT: receive a peer review report of the YMCA Traffic Impact Analysis
Mayor Davis reminded the audience that the City retained Mr. Kevin St. Jacques, a traffic
engineer with the firm Freese & Nichols, to perform a review of the TIA submitted with the
YMCA’s PD amendment application. He asked Mr. St. Jacques to present his findings and
he requested Mr. St. Jacques concentrate his summary on facets of his report where he
noted differences from the DeShazo Tang TIA. Mayor Davis stated that following Mr. St.
Jacques presentation and time for any questions the Council may have, he will move to the
public hearing and provide time for rebuttal and summarization of the YMCA PD
amendment request. Mayor Davis said all parties will be given the chance to address the
Council.
Mr. Kevin St. Jacques addressed the Council. He presented his assessment of the DeShazo
Tang traffic and parking study. He noted the DeShazo Tang study followed generally
accepted principles in the preparation of their report. Mr. St. Jacques said he reviewed how
the original study was done, using standards of parking and traffic impact assessment. Mr.
St. Jacques also noted the report was prepared using certain assumptions because the project
is a future project.
Mr. St. Jacques explained how he used current operations as a baseline with forward
projections related to operations changes. He stated he used 2010 program year data
to calculate the forward projections. He said 2010 had the highest usage numbers, and he
said that data provided a good baseline.
He explained how he calculated 1.25 as the number of vehicles to be parked per child on a
soccer team. He mentioned that the YMCA's TIA used 1.0 per child.
He stated he calculated afternoon peak to be the highest while the morning peak was
identified as higher in the DeShazo study. He also mentioned that the DeShazo study used
data collected on a Thursday, but he said usage counts are usually higher on Mondays
through Wednesdays, so he feels the usage counts taken by DeShazo were somewhat lower
than they should be.
Mr. St. Jacques also stated he determined there would be little negative traffic impact on
Preston Road from the proposed redevelopment of the YMCA. He said estimates from the
North Central Council of Governments show Preston Road traffic to be declining, due to
improvements on other nearby major thoroughfares.
Mr. St. Jacques detailed some differences he calculated in regards to the number of parking
spaces that will be required. He said he recommended the addition of 3 spaces for potential
increased administrative personnel, 5 more spaces for the Rise School to allow for longer
drop-off times, 36 additional spaces to provide for the gymnasium due to a higher vehicle to
team member ratio, 10 more spaces allocated for the increase in the multipurpose spaces,
and 5 additional spaces attributed to the increase in adult fitness/spin class sizes. He said
with those additions, he calculated the YMCA parking garage will need to increase
the number of provided parking spaces to 330.
Mr. St. Jacques stated the YMCA should do what it can to ensure patrons park in the garage
by not having much external parking available. He said the City could institute a
Residential Parking District or designate certain areas as No Parking.
He then discussed the offset alignment of Normandy as it crosses Preston. He stated the
road could be realigned into a more four-legged intersection for better flow or the traffic
signal light could be changed to allow each side of Normandy to have it's own cycle. He
also said pedestrian crosswalks need to be enhanced for better safety. He also stated a
southbound left turn lane from Preston onto Normandy will need to be installed by the
City. He said this will improve traffic flow into the parking garage.
Mr. St. Jacques said some residents stated there should be more than one access point to
garage. He said he determined that even at peak usage times, one ingress/egress will be
able to handle the activity. He did mention that there should be an easy way for garage
users to access the game fields to encourage patrons to park there rather than the street.
Mr. St. Jacques stated that the YMCA sets the programs for its customers and therefore
wants to provide for their comfort and safety. He said any parking limitations will only
constrain their operations. He said the City can control on-street parking and street
operations.
Mayor Davis asked if anyone had questions for Mr. St. Jacques.
Mr. Peter Rogers, 6200 St. Andrews, stated a newly constructed YMCA will attract more
people to their neighborhood. He also expressed concern about the amount of vehicles that
will be parked on the residential streets during construction.
Mr. St. Jacques said he recommended the garage driveway opening be no closer than 129 ft.
from Preston Road to reduce interference with westbound Normandy traffic waiting at the
Preston Road light. He said this distance was the 95th percentile of queuing traffic at this
intersection.
Mr. Duncan Fulton said he noted a possible overcount of 14 parking spaces due to
supplemental information provided about the Rise School. He said this will revise the
theoretical maximum required parking from 330 down to 316. Mr. St. Jacques agreed.
Mr. Tom Black, 4117 Shenandoah, asked Mr. St. Jacques about using 8 players in his
calculations. He stated that many soccer teams have more than 8 members. He said this
would bring more vehicles. Mr. St. Jacques said if this was true, then the 1.25 percentage
would be reduced so there would not be much impact on the number of vehicles.
There were no more questions for Mr. St. Jacques and Mayor Davis opened the public
hearing.
Mr. Duncan Fulton, architect for the YMCA project, addressed the Council. He said much
B. PUBLIC HEARING: Continue a public hearing and provide direction to staff on a request
by the Park Cities YMCA to amend Planned Development District PD-12, to demolish the
existing structure and redevelop a 3.72 acre tract more or less, with a 65,000 sq. ft. facility
and below-grade parking garage.
of the commentary from thosed opposed to the project is based on opinion with little factual
information. He stated the YMCA has provided much hard data to assist the Council with
their decision. He said the data are substantiated, relevant facts. Mr. Fulton said the review
of the TIA ordered by the City showed that the TIA was done properly and generated proper
results.
He stated the YMCA is a good fit for the City. He said the building is designed to be
constructed within the City’s Zoning Ordinance FAR standards as are other comparable
facilities in the City. He said the YMCA has been in this location for 50 years, is entitled to
its uses and has no plans to change it current uses. Mr. Fulton stated they want to enhance
the youth programs and will make good decisions on how to match the building with
programs provided for residents.
Mr. Fulton said the building’s current design causes the "busyness" in the neighborhood and
if the Council approves the new plan, the "busyness" will be eased. He said the evidence
shows the YMCA’s proposed plan will not be too big and will not negatively impact traffic
density.
Mr. Fulton said the YMCA has made 26 or 27 significant compromises requested by the
neighbors and they did so with no judgements on their validity. He stated the neighbors
requested the building be redesigned to better fit the neighborhood and the YMCA agreed.
He said the YMCA needs to justify the $20 to $25 million capital campaign with a project
that will meet their foreseeable needs. He said the additional parking will improve the
existing shortfall with no material impact on traffic. He said five traffic studies come to the
same conclusion.
Mr. Fulton said the YMCA has received a tremendous amount of support from local
residents. He said the need is clear and asked the Council to approve this request.
Mayor Pro Tem Clark said largest component of the renovation is the new gymnasium. He
asked if this was a new need. Mr. Fulton said the YMCA is the largest youth sports
provider in community and the only provider with no gym. He said it is a long-standing
need.
Mayor Pro Tem Clark asked if the gym will have grandstands and Mr. Fulton said it will
not. He stated there will be the opportunity for parents to stand around and watch the
games, but no grandstands like a high school gym.
Councilmember Begert asked if the YMCA is prepared to give up some of their property to
align Normandy. Mr. Fulton said this is another aspect of a compromise the YMCA is
willing to make. He stated the Y will agree to this if that is what the Council decides. He
said in prior discussions with City staff, it was discussed that the Y could grant an easement
to the City for use in realignment.
A resident asked from the audience if the YMCA planned to charge to use the parking
garage. Mr. Fulton said there will be no fees for patrons.
Councilmember Begert asked how the YMCA will ease resident concerns related to Y
patrons parking in or blocking their driveways. Mr. Greg Pappas, Executive Director of the
Park Cities YMCA, said the staff does patrol the area for parking issues. He said they walk
the perimeter of the building to monitor parking concerns, but during outdoor sports seasons
it is more difficult to control. He said the YMCA will do whatever they can to be a good
neighbor and help ensure parking concerns are addressed.
Mrs. Gail Schoellkopf, 4006 Shenandoah, addressed the Council. She summarized her
concerns. She said the proposed size is too large. She stated the facility will dominate the
neighborhood and threaten property values. She said the YMCA was built with gifts, many
from neighbors, but the neighborhood is now suffering. She said the parking and traffic
problems created by the YMCA should no longer be permitted to continue. She said the
YMCA can correct these problems by revising their programming and moving some
programs to other locations. She said there are alternatives for these programs at other
facilities.
Mr. Tom Black addressed the Council. He stated the neighbors have presented many
perspectives and he believes the primary root cause of the opposition to the project is what
the YMCA has stated is non-negotiable. Mr. Black said the size drives most of the
neighborhood concerns. He said the facility will be too tall and bulky and is out of
proportion to the neighborhood. Mr. Black said the allocation of available parking will not
support the proposed new uses of the YMCA and will leave the neighborhood worse off.
He said the YMCA began as a youth facility and over time, added adult fitness facilities.
He said he realizes this is a complicated issue but he urged the Council to deny the request
to amend the PD. He said the Council has an obligation to find the best long-term outcome
for the City.
Dr. James Huth addressed the Council. He said the addition of the Rise School to the
YMCA does not make sense. He said the main traffic problems occur during early morning
hours and evening hours, not during the day. He mentioned that the YMCA is not
managing their facility in a neighborhood-friendly manner.
Ms. Kitty Holleman, a resident of University Park, addressed the Council. She suggested
the Council relocate the YMCA to University Blvd. and the North Dallas Tollway and
move the tennis courts to the current YMCA location.
Mr. Gill Brown, 4007 Normandy, asked the Council to hold the YMCA accountable for the
daily activities in the neighborhood. He asked the Council to get compromises in writing
and to help build trust with the neighbors. Mr. Brown also urged the Council to request the
YMCA to construct the parking garage to be accessed from Preston. He said the creation of
a residential parking district is very important.
Mr. Bill Bolding, 4101 Stanhope, stated he resides within the 200 ft. buffer zone. He asked
whether anyone had presented data showing the potential impact of the project on the
appraised values of nearby homes.
Mr. Peter Rogers asked the Council to ensure that the construction workers not be allowed
to park in the neighborhoods. He stated 100 to 150 vehicles daily will be parked on city
streets during construction if the request is approved.
Councilmember Moore said parking is a self-regulator. She asked Director of Public Works
Bud Smallwood if the City can implement a residential parking district knowing that there
will not be enough parking for the YMCA. Mr. Smallwood said yes.
There were no further requests to speak and Mayor Davis closed the public hearing.
Mayor Davis said the Council will reconsider this issue during the September 4 Council
Meeting. He stated no further input will be taken from the public unless there is a new
major development. He stated the Council hopes to have an answer for this request at that
meeting.
City Manager Bob Livingston addressed the Council regarding the proposed FY2013
budget. He said this was the second public hearing on the proposed budget. There was no
one present who wished to discuss the budget and Councilmember Begert closed the public
hearing.
No one wished to address the Council from the floor and Mayor Davis adjourned the meeting.
Considered and approved this 4th day of September, 2012.
___________________________
W. Richard Davis, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Elizabeth Spector, City Secretary
C. PUBLIC HEARING: on proposed FY2013 budget and tax rate
IV. ITEMS FROM THE FLOOR
AGENDAMEMO
(9/4/2012AGENDA)
TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil
FROM:HarryPersaud,ChiefPlanningOfficial
SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onarequestbytheParkCitiesYMCAtoamendPlanned
DevelopmentDistrictPD-12,todemolishtheexistingstructureandredevelopa3.72
acretractmoreorless,withanew65,000sq.ft.facilityandabelowgradeparking
garage.
BACKGROUND:
CityCouncil convenedapublichearingonthisitematitsregularmeetingonAugust7,
2012.AtaspecialcalledmeetingonAugust28,2012,Councilreceivedareportfrom
FreeseandNicholsregardingareviewoftheparkingandtrafficstudysubmittedbythe
PCYMCA.Afterthereportwaspresentedanddiscussed,Councilcontinuedthepublic
hearingontherequesttoamendPD-12.Thepublichearingwassubsequentlyclosed.
Atthisstageinthezoningprocess,Councilmayproceedtoconsiderthezoningrequest
and/orprovidedirectiontostaffwithregardtothedraftingofanordinanceapprovingthe
request.Sincemorethan20%ofthepropertieswithin200feetofthesubjectsiteare
opposedtotheproposedzoningamendment,approvalofthisrequestwillrequireavote
ofatleast4membersoftheCityCouncil.
RECOMMENDATION:
PlanningandZoningCommissionconsideredthisitematitsregularmeetingonJune12,2012and
voted4-1torecommendapprovalsubjecttospecialconditionsattached.
ATTACHMENTS:
DraftPDConditions
Existingandproposedusesbyfloorarea
P&Zrecommendedsiteplan
1
DRAFT PD CONDITIONS: (07-17-12)
Items in bold text represent details which have been agreed upon between some
residents and the YMCA.
A. Permitted Land Use: PC YMCA
Primary and accessory uses associated with the functions and activities of the
YMCA to include, but not limited to the following:
a. Pre-K and daycare classrooms -7,189 sq. ft.
limited to a maximum enrollment of 60
b. Gymnasium -10,481 sq. ft.
c. Indoor pools -13,049 sq. ft.
d. Adult fitness - 7,087 sq. ft.
e. Multi purpose, racquetball etc. - 7,571 sq. ft.
f. Administration offices - 4,609 sq. ft.
g. Locker rooms, restrooms, Lobby - 15,014 sq. ft.
h. Outdoor playground located on the north
side of the subject site.
B. Maximum Building Size:
The maximum gross floor area of the proposed development shall not exceed
65,000 sq. ft.
C. Building Setbacks:
All building setbacks measured from the property line and shown on the
conceptual site plan as follows:
a. Minimum front yard setback along Preston Road: 45 ft
b. Side yard setback on north side along Shenandoah: 147 ft
c. Side yard setback on south side along Normandy: 49 ft
d. Rear yard setback along the Connerly frontage: 18 ft
e. A screened service area for dumpsters and outdoor storage is shown
attached to the southeast corner of the building. The primary building is
setback 34 feet at that location.
f. Permanent foundation structural supports at underground garage may not
extend past property line and any temporary supports shall comply with all
City codes and policies in effect at the time of construction. Drawings
prepared by a State of Texas licensed professional engineer, providing all
design calculations being employed to resist lateral soil loads as specified
in Section 1610 of the 2009 IBC shall be submitted with the plans for
permit.
2
D. Building Standards:
a. Two stories above grade with parking garage below grade providing for a
minimum of 300 parking spaces
b. Maximum building height of 35 feet except that the Gymnasium may be
constructed with a maximum height not to exceed 44 feet
c. Maximum plate line height 31 feet
d. Building materials: Insulated glass with dark annodized aluminum frame;
prefinished wood siding; natural stone veneer, stucco veneer and standing
seam metal roof.
e. FAR: 0.443
f. The parking garage shall be located as shown on the conceptual site plan.
E. Parking:
a. An underground garage with a minimum of 300 parking spaces shall be
provided for the proposed development. Carbon monoxide or like
sensor(s) will be installed and will regulate the operation of the
exhaust fans for the Parking Garage. Noise levels from exhaust fans
shall not exceeded 71dB at any property line. At grade spaces serving
the drop off lane on Preston shall be a minimum of 23 feet in length.
b. Details for the parking garage to include design of parking layout, drive
aisle width, parking space dimension, turning radii, access ramps and
number of spaces shall be provided with the detailed site plan. Driveway
ramp shall comply with Article 3.12 of the City Code of Ordinances.
F. Landscape Development Plan:
a. Perimeter trees shown on the conceptual site plan shall be evergreen with
a minimum of 5” caliper and 9 feet in height at the time of installation.
b. Trees along the Normandy frontage in full view of the single family
homes shall be installed and maintained prior to the opening and use of the
parking garage.
c. A perimeter fence will be installed around the playground with limited
access through gates located in close proximity to the drop off lane on
Preston Road and at the midpoint of the playground on Connerly Drive.
d. The detailed landscape development plan will provide details for shrubs
and groundcover and include specie, caliper, height and location of all
trees.
e. All landscaping shall be irrigated and must be in place prior to the issue of
a certificate of occupancy.
G. Signage:
All new signs on the site must be in compliance with the City of University Park
sign regulations in effect at the time of the sign permit application.
3
H. Dumpsters:
Refuse or trash containers will be located in the Service Area and all trash
and recyclable pickups from the containers will be conducted by the City of
University Park. The specific location of dumpsters for the proposed
development shall be shown on the detailed site plan. The final design and
placement of dumpsters is subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works.
I. Utilities:
The size and location of all water and sewer taps for the proposed development
shall be shown on the detailed site plan and shall be reviewed and approved by
the Director of Public Works prior to the issue of a building permit.
J. External Walls:
Detailed specs including color and texture of all materials used for external
cladding of the building shall be provided with the detailed site plan.
K. Sidewalks:
A continuous side walk is required around the perimeter of the building. Details
to be shown on the detailed site plan.
L. External Lighting:
Location, mounting height and photometric details for all external light fixtures
on the site shall be provided on the detailed site plan. Exterior lighting
overflow/spillage shall not exceed five (5) foot candles at the mid-point of any
surrounding city street.
M. Exhaust Fans:
Noise from exhaust fans installed in the parking garage may not exceed current
ambient levels of 71 dB at the property line. Noise in excess of this level shall
be attenuated. Fans shall be programmed to shut off at the close of business.
N. Traffic Study:
PC YMCA is required to pay the full cost for a comprehensive traffic study to be
conducted approximately 12 months after a certificate of occupancy has been
issued for the new facility. The traffic study shall be performed by a consultant
selected by the City Council and the YMCA shall pay the cost for any future
traffic control measures or studies deemed necessary by the City Council.
O. Hours of Operation:
Maximum hours of operation of the Facility shall be as follows:
Monday through Friday 5:30 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.
Saturday 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
Sunday 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
4
P. Interior Lighting:
Interior lights visible from the exterior will be turned off no later than thirty
minutes of operation closing, except in the areas being cleaned, provided
that, with the exception of emergency and code-required lighting, interior
lighting will be turned off no later than 11:30 p.m and lock-ins held in spaces
with blackout shades fully extended.
Q. Vehicles Parked in the Service Area:
No vehicles taller than the screening wall in the Service Area shown on
Exhibit “A”, will be parked overnight. No structures or storage items will
erected or placed in the Service Area that are taller than the screening wall.
R. Construction standard:
The Facility will be constructed in substantial compliance with the
conceptual site plan, building elevations and renderings approved by the City
Council and referenced Exhibit “A” and Representative Facility Images
and Materials (Exhibit “B”) attached hereto, as determined by the Director
of Community Development for the City of University Park and shall further
comply with all applicable City codes then in effect.
S. Service Area:
The Service Area will be gated, and the gate will be a metal-framed gate with
an exterior face using wood similar to, or the same as, the wood on the
Facility, and will have an automatic opener and closer to keep the service
gate closed when the Service Area is not in use.
T. Parking and Delivery During Construction:
Construction activities within the PD will be conducted under City of
University Park building and city codes. Parking for construction workers’
vehicles will be located off-site and workers will be transported to and from
the construction site, provided that, when the Parking Garage is available for
use, it can be used for parking construction workers’ vehicles. All deliveries
of construction materials to the construction site will begin no earlier than
9:00 am and will end by 4:00 pm Monday through Saturday. Construction
contractor(s) will make reasonable efforts to receive deliveries through the
Normandy Avenue/Preston Road intersection entrance, understanding that
this might not be possible at varying time during construction.
U. Staging and Screening:
No residential streets will be used for continuous staging of construction
work and or materials. Any significant exterior construction areas shall be
fenced to screen the site including a green screening material placed on the
fence, maintenance or landscaping work excluded, all in accordance with the
city codes.
5
V. Full Time Liaison:
The YMCA shall provide a full-time liaison that has authority during to
respond to questions and complaints from the nearby citizens during the
construction period. A phone number for this contact will be provided to all
property owners from the St. Andrews Neighborhood Association (“SANA”)
and the West of Preston Neighbors (“WPN”) and posted on the job site
where it can be readily found by interested parties.
Additional Boilerplate Conditions:
Construction Vehicles: No parking of construction vehicles or equipment will
be permitted on City streets. If space is available, all parking shall be
accommodated on the site. If available space is inadequate, the developer shall
provide off-site parking and shuttle workers to the site. Parking of
construction vehicles on City streets which are closed for construction must be
approved by the Director of Public Works.
Construction Hours: Unless written permission is granted by the Director of
Public Works, construction work on the site is restricted to Monday through
Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
Background Checks: Background checks will be performed by the contractors
for all construction workers prior to them working on the site. Information
relating to background checks will be kept on file by the contractors. A
convicted felon or pedophile will be barred from working on the site.
Screening Fence: The construction site will be screened with a temporary
eight foot (8') screening fence of dark green or black windscreen fabric, or
other material approved by the Community Development Director, and
installed on a chain link fence.
Explosives: No explosives shall be used in the construction operations.
Security: The developer shall provide and pay the costs for adequate security
and traffic control around the campus for all functions.
PARK CITIES YMCA RENOVATION
Square Footage Comparison
04.02.12
Functional area Present Program Area (SF)Proposed Facility Net additional Allocation
Indoor Outdoor Total
Program
(Square Feet)Square Feet
(as of Date
Listed)
@ 65,000 SF
NON-ACTIVITY SPACE
Lobby, Restrooms and circulation areas 4,604 4,604 11,188 6,584 11,773
Men/Womens Locker rooms 2,703 2,703 3,080 377 3,241
Office/administration 2,833 2,833 4,380 1,547 4,609
Sub Total 10,140 - 10,140 18,648 8,508 19,624
ACTIVITY SPACE
Pre K/Childwatch area 2,244 2,244 6,830 4,586 7,187
Outside Sportcourt/gymnasium 2,344 2,344 9,960 7,616 10,481
Indoor and outdoor pools 5,800 6,996 12,796 12,400 (396) 13,049
Adult Fitness and spin rooms 5,385 5,385 6,735 1,350 7,087
Hodges Hall/Racquetball/Courtyard/multipurpose space6,472 2,420 8,892 7,195 (1,697) 7,571
Sub Total 19,901 11,760 31,661 43,120 11,459 45,376
Total 30,041 11,760 41,801 61,768 19,967 65,000
Increase as a % of Total Program Area 48%55%
P:\2010\10088\g-jurisdictional agencies\[PD-Schedule of Uses PCYMCA-Indoor Outdoor.xlsx]Sheet1
GARAGE ACCESS RAMP
DOWN
NORMANDY AVENUE
SHENANDOAH STREET
C
O
N
N
E
R
L
Y
D
R
I
V
E
PR
E
S
T
O
N
R
O
A
D
16
SOCCER FIELD
40YDS X 80YDS
5' SIDEWALK
PLAYGROUND
FENCE
RIGHT OUT ONLY
LEFT OUT ONLY
IN FROM EITHER DIRECTION
BUILDING
ENTRY
SCREENED
SERVICE AREA
COVERED GARAGE
EXIT & VENT
PATIO
BUILDING
ENTRY
4
3
APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF
BELOW GRADE GARAGE.
MINIMUM 300 CARS REQUIRED.
2 STORY BUILDING
MAXIMUM 65,000 CONDITIONED SF ABOVE GRADE
MAXIMUM HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED 44 FEET TO THE
RIDGELINE.
PROPERTY
LINE
10' SCREEN WALL
ADD ONE NEW DEDICATED
TURN LANE. NORMANDY
LIGHT TO BE RIGHT ONLY &
LEFT ONLY. NO STRAIGHT
THROUGH ALLOWED.
AS RECOMMENDED BY P&Z
AGENDAMEMO
(9/4/2012AGENDA)
TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil
FROM:GeneR.Smallwood,P.E.;DirectorofPublicWorks
SUBJECT:DISCUSS:WaltHumannrequestforimprovementsalongthesouthboundN.Central
Expresswayfrontage
BACKGROUND:
Mr.HumannrecentlymetwithstaffregardingpotentialimprovementsalongthesouthboundN.
CentralExpresswayfrontage.WiththeopeningoftheGeorgeW.BushPresidentialCenterinApril
2013,hesuggestedthiswouldbeanopportunityfortheCitytomakecertainimprovementsalongthe
corridorincluding:
*Paintingthescreeningwall
*Constructportalstructuresatkeyintersections
*Sidewalkreplacement
*Securityissues
*Landscapeimprovements
*LinearParkimprovements(westofwall)
Mr.HumannwillattendTuesday'smeetingandmakehispresentationtoCouncil.Therearecurrently
nofundsidentifiedintheCity's5-yearCapitalProjectsfund.
RECOMMENDATION:
StaffsolicitsCityCouncildirectionregardingthisrequestedproject.
AGENDAMEMO
(9/4/2012AGENDA)
TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil
FROM:JimCriswell,DirectorofInformationServices
SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onapprovalofaproposalfromEnerGovSolutions,LLCto
provideCommunityDevelopmentSoftwareandImplementationServices
BACKGROUND:
SincethecompletionoftheCityHallremodelinthespringof2009,InformationServiceshasbeen
systematicallyupgradingtheCity'scoresoftwareapplicationsaspartofastrategicplantomigrateall
ofthesupportedcomputingsystemstoaMicrosoftnetworkingplatform.Aspartofthisinitiative,the
Court,Finance,HumanResources,UtilityBilling,Police,Fire,andComputer-aidedDispatch
Systemshavebeensuccessfullyupgraded.Theremainingprimaryapplicationtobemigratedisthe
CommunityDevelopmentSystem.
ToensurethatthenewCommunityDevelopmentSystemwillachievethegoalofa10-yearlife,
improvedparcelandpermitmanagement,comprehensiveGeographicInformationSystem(GIS)
integration,dynamicplanreviewcapability,citizenandcontractoronlineandInteractiveVoice
Response(IVR)access,andextensivemobiledevicesupport,aHighTechnologyRequestfor
Proposal(RFP)waspublishedinJanuary.
TherewereeightcompaniesthatrespondedtotheRFP.Overthepastfewmonths,theCity'snine-
memberevaluationteamhasbeenconductinginternalreviewmeetings,checkingreferences,and
hostingbothweb-based,andon-sitedemonstrations.Initially,theCitynarrowedthelistofresponders
tofourvendorsforweb-baseddemonstrations.Fromthatpoint,twofinalistswerebroughtinforon-
sitedemonstrations.
RECOMMENDATION:
ThereweresixrespondersproposingaviablesolutionfortheCommunityDevelopmentDepartment.
TylerTechnologies$221,465
CRW$263,000
NewWorldSystems$315,400
EnerGovSolutions$321,279
MSGovern$402,722
SungardPS$408,755
BecausethisRFPwasforahightechnologypurchaseinaccordancewithSection252.021(b)ofthe
TexasLocalGovernmentCode,weconsideredotherfactorsbesidesthepurchasepriceindetermining
thebestvaluefortheCity.Eachproposalwasscoredaccordingtothefollowingcriteria:
-Initialcostofmodulesforcoreservicesincludingone-timeandrecurringcosts
-AssessmentofsoftwaresuitabilitybasedonresponsestoRequirementsMatrix
-Assessmentofvendorqualifications,experience,stayingpowerandfinancialstability,including
proposedstaffingandabilitytomeetthemilestonedates
-Integrationintoexistingtechnologyinfrastructure
-Assessmentofsoftwarefeatures,easeofoperatingthesystem,reportwritinggeneration,and
designingcustomreports
Aftertheextensivereviewprocessoutlinedabove,theEnerGovSystemwasdeterminedtobethebest
longtermsolutionfortheCity.InadditiontotherobustCommunityDevelopmentsoftwarefeatures
providedwiththeEnerGovSystem,theStaffwasveryimpressedwiththetightintegrationtothe
ESRI(EnvironmentalSystemsResearchInstitute)mappingsystem.TheInformationServices
DepartmenthasbeenworkingtowardanESRIEnterpriseGISsolutionforthreeyears.Giventhe
extensiveuseofCitymapdatabyCommunityDevelopment,thistightintegrationtoGISwillgreatly
helpusreachthatgoal.TheaddedvaluetoourGISinitiativewasanunexpectedbenefitofselecting
EnerGov.
StaffrecommendsapprovaloftheEnerGovSolutionsproposalintheamountof$321,279.
FUNDINGSOURCE:
ThefundingforthisprojectiscontainedintwoInformationTechnologyCapitalImprovement
Projects.
Project13120-EnterpriseGISSystemUpgrade-$122,020
Project13400-CommunityDevelopmentSoftwareReplacement-$250,000
ThefundingfortheseprojectshasbeenapprovedbytheCapitalProjectsCommittee.
AGENDAMEMO
(9/4/2012AGENDA)
TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil
FROM:SteveMace,CommunityInformationOfficer
SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onfundingmethodfortheCollegeScholarshipProgram
BACKGROUND:
TheCollegeScholarshipProgrambeganin2009withadonationtotheUniversityParkCivic
Foundation.Theprogram'ssolepurposeistoawardcollegescholarshipstothechildrenofCity
employees.Todate,theefforthasawardedanaverageof15scholarshipsduringthefallandspring
semesters.Withtheprogram'soriginalgiftof$60,000soontobeexhausted,acitizencommitteehas
studiedvariousoptionstogenerateongoingfunds.Thecommitteebelievesthemosteffectiveoption
istoaddavoluntary50¢donationtoeachutilitybilleachmonth.
Atthecommittee'sdirection,aquestionconcerningtheprogram'sfundingwasincludedonthe2011
CommunitySurvey.Thosewhorespondedtothequestion(1,024households)supportedavoluntary
50¢monthlydonationbyatwo-to-onemargin.PriortorequestingthattheitemappearonaCity
CouncilAgenda,thecommitteedecidedtonotifyeachutilitycustomerbyletterconcerningthe
scholarshipprogramandongoingfunding.Providingbackgroundonthescholarshipprogram,the
letterdetailedthecommittee'sdesiretofundscholarshipsthroughavoluntary50¢donationviaeach
monthlyutilitybill.Theletterwasdeliveredtoallresidentialandcommercialcustomerstheweekof
July16,2012.Theletterinformedcustomersthattheycouldopt-outofthevoluntary50¢monthly
donationatanypointintimebycontactingtheCity'sUtilityBillingOffice.Todate,19customers
havechosentodoso.
Cityemployeesarenotinvolvedinanyaspectofthescholarshipselectionprocessordecisions
concerningthecurrentorfuturescopeoftheprogram.
RECOMMENDATION:
StaffseeksdirectionfromtheCouncilontherequesttoincludethevoluntarydonationontheCity
monthlyutilitybills.
ATTACHMENTS:
CollegeScholarshipFundingLetter
AGENDAMEMO
(9/4/2012AGENDA)
TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil
FROM:BobLivingston,CityManager
SUBJECT:PRESENTATION:ofproposedFY2013Budget-FinalPresentation
BACKGROUND:
TheproposedFY2013budgethasbeenreviewedandrecommendedbythreeAdvisoryCommittees--
EmployeeBenefits,Finance,andProperty/Casualty/LiabilityInsurance.TheCapitalProjectsReview
CommitteereviewedandrecommendedapprovaloftheFY2013capitalbudget(scheduledfor
the9/18/2012Councilmeeting)attheirAugust20meeting.
TheCityCouncilheldpublichearingsonthebudgetandproposedtaxrateAugust21and28,and
staffhaspublishedtherequirednoticesinthelocalnewspaperandCitywebsite.Adoptionofthe
budgetoccursbyordinance,asdoesthepropertytaxrate,payplan,andTMRSservicecredit
updating.
HB3195REQUIREMENTS
In2007theTexasLegislatureapprovedHouseBill3195.Thislawrequiresthatbudgetsraisingmore
revenuefrompropertytaxesthaninthepreviousyearmustincludeacoverpagewiththefollowing
statementin18-pointorlargertype:
“Thisbudgetwillraisemoretotalpropertytaxesthanlastyear’sbudgetby$X,andofthat
amount,$Yistaxrevenuetoberaisedfromnewpropertyaddedtothetaxrollthisyear.”
Thisyear,theproposedtaxratewillraisetotalpropertytaxesby$65,334comparedtotheprioryear,
andofthatamount,$193,057istaxrevenuegeneratedbynewpropertyaddedtothetaxrollthisyear.
TheCityManager'sFY2013budgetmemocontainstherequiredstatement.
RECOMMENDATION:
IrecommendthattheCounciltakethefollowingactionstoapprovetheFY2013budgetandrelated
items:
1.HoldafinalhearingontheFY2013budget .Attheconclusionofthe
hearing,thebudgetisreadyforaction.
2.ApprovetheordinanceadoptingtheFY2013budget.Th etotalbudgetof
$44,275,593is2.90%higherthanlastyear’s$43,027,730adopted
budget.TheCity’sthreebudgetedfundsincludetheGeneral,Utility,and
SanitationFunds.
3.Approvetheordinanceadoptingthetaxyear2012(FY2013)propertytax
rateof$0.27845per$100taxablevalue .Theentirerateisdedicatedfor
maintenanceandoperations,includingbudgetedamountstobetransferredto
thecapitalprojectsfund;thereisnodebtservice.Theeffectivetaxrateis
$0.279174—thisistheratethatwouldraiseasmuchpropertytaxrevenueas
lastyearwhenappliedagainstpropertiesonthetaxrollinboth
years.Consequently,theproposedtaxrateof$0.27845isaneffectivetax
decrease.
4.ApprovetheordinanceadoptingtheFY2013salaryplan .Theplan
includesa3%market-basedpayincrease,thefirstintwoyears.Totalfull-
timeheadcountis243employees,twomorethanlastyear,includingthe
additionofthreefull-timelibrarypositions.
5.ApprovetheordinanceupdatingTMRSservicecreditsforcurrent
employeesandapprovingapartialCOLA(costoflivingadjustment)for
retirees.TheagendamemofromDirectorofHumanResourcesLuanne
Hanfordprovidesmoredescriptionofthesechanges.Approvalofthe
ordinancewillreducetheCity'sTMRSemployercontributionratefrom10%
to8.26%.
ATTACHMENTS:
FY2013CMPROPOSEDBUDGETPACKAGE
FinanceAdvisoryCommittee8/9/2012meetingminutes
PCLAdvisoryCommittee8/23/2012meetingminutes
EmployeeBenefitsAdvisoryCommittee8/28/2012meetingminutes
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS
FY2013 PROPOSED BUDGET
October 1, 2012 – September 30, 2013
August 7, 2012
This budget will raise total property taxes versus last year’s
budget by $65,334 or 0.42%, and of that amount, $193,057 is
tax revenue to be raised from new property added to the tax roll
this year.
This statement is required by HB 3195 of the 80th Texas Legislature.
1
M E M O
DATE: August 7, 2012
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Bob Livingston, City Manager
SUBJECT: Proposed FY2013 budget
INTRODUCTION
This memo presents the City Manager’s proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2013 (FY2013, the period
October 1, 2012 – September 30, 2013). The proposed FY2013 expenditure budget totals $44,275,593, a
2.90% increase from FY2012.
The budget maintains the same City property tax rate as the past two years: 27.845 cents per $100 taxable
value. While the overall tax base rose just 0.35%, single-family home values stayed level. The average
single-family homeowner will pay one dollar less in City property taxes under the proposed budget.
FY2013 marks the first year of the University Park Public Library as a City department, with an initial
budget of $600,000. Of this amount, $300,000 will be funded by the UP Friends of the Library. Prior
City budgets included library expenditures of $196,555, so the net budget increase is only $103,445.
The proposed budget includes a 3% pay raise for City employees, the first in two years. This increase is
partly offset by a reduction in the City’s TMRS contribution rate, from 10% to 8.26%. The number of
full-time positions totals 243, reflecting the addition of three new Library employees.
The table below compares total expenditures for the City’s three budgeted funds--General, Utility, and
Sanitation. Three other funds--Capital Projects, Equipment Services, and Self-Insurance--are not
included in the formal budget, because their revenues originate from the three budgeted funds. A
summary page showing the proposed budget by fund and department follows this memo.
.
FUND
FY2011
ACTUAL
EXPENDS
FY2012
ADOPTED
BUDGET
FY2013
PROPOSED
BUDGET $ CHANGE % CHANGE
GENERAL$27,003,169$26,724,086 $27,261,321 $537,235 2.01%
UTILITY$13,716,254$13,435,168 $14,242,469 $807,301 6.01%
SANITATION$2,686,568$2,868,476 $2,771,803 ($96,673) ‐3.37%
TOTAL$43,405,991$43,027,730 $44,275,593 $1,247,8632.90%
2
As can be seen, the most dramatic change is in the Utility Fund. Water and wastewater rate increases will
be needed to keep pace with the 13% higher rate for treated water from the Dallas County Park Cities
Municipal Utility District (MUD) and reduced wastewater revenues.
City staff is working to select a consultant to perform a comprehensive water and wastewater rate study,
with input from the City Council and City advisory committees. The study is expected to be completed
by November so that rates can be considered by the City Council before December 31. Consequently, the
proposed FY2013 budget shows the likely effect of a rate increase in Utility Fund revenues but does not
yet recommend specific rate changes.
ADDITIONAL BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS
• Sales tax revenues continue upward, from $3,121,443 in FY2010 to a projected $3,399,321in
FY2012. Some of the increase in FY2012 comes from lump-sum sales tax recoveries. The
FY2013 budget proposes sales tax revenue of $3,338,000.
• Single family home starts continue to increase—for the seven months ended July 31, new SF
home permits total 40, versus 34 during the same time last year. Building permit revenue
continues to benefit from large SMU and commercial projects. Permit revenues were boosted in
FY2011 by the George W. Bush Presidential Center ($1,670,697) and in FY2012 by the Plaza at
Preston Center office building and the SMU sophomore commons projects. Permit revenue for
the first ten months of FY2012 totaled $2,305,344, compared with a budget of $1,400,000 and
last year’s total of $2,846,125. While FY2013 is expected to include revenues from projects like
the renovation of SMU’s Moody Coliseum, the proposed revenue budget remains at $1,400,000.
• The General, Utility, and Sanitation Fund budgets are balanced, so that proposed expenditures are
matched by projected revenues. Again, however, this presumes increases in water and
wastewater rates, which are not yet specified in the proposed FY2013 budget.
• Direct Alarm monitoring continues to be a bright spot. Actual alarm monitoring revenue has
increased from $652,999 in FY2008 to a projected $823,000 in FY2012. The FY2013 budget
proposes Direct Alarm revenue of $866,989.
• Pay-as-you-go capital project funding of $5.2 million is maintained. Of this amount, $3,032,187
is budgeted in the General Fund (Department 01-85, Transfers) and $2,195,415 in the Utility
Fund (Department 02-85, Transfers). These amounts are moved to the Capital Projects Fund in
12 level installments during the fiscal year. A separate FY2013 capital budget will be reviewed
by the Capital Projects Review Committee on August 20 and forwarded to the City Council for
adoption in September.
As I have said in the past three budgets, I want to commend our department heads and employees for
preparing budgets that balance the current economic climate with continued delivery of quality services.
Over the last three years, the General Fund budget has increased just 1.71%, compared to a 6.48% rise in
the Consumer Price Index for Dallas-Fort Worth and a 9.3% increase in the Municipal Cost Index (MCI).
[The MCI is a statistic developed by American City & County magazine that is designed to show the
specific effects of inflation on the cost of providing city services. It differs from the Consumer Price
Index by including elements common to cities, like health care, fuel, and construction materials.]
3
CITYWIDE EXPENDITURE ISSUES
Seven categories account for 85% of the total budget’s expenditures. Of these, four are level or
decreasing for FY2013:
PERSONNEL
Salaries and benefits comprise 53% ($23.3 million) of the $44 million total budget. Three full-time
Library positions are being added; with other changes, total full-time positions rise from 241 to 243.
Salary changes
A 3% market raise is included in the FY2013 budget, amounting to an increase of about $507,400
citywide. No raise was included in the FY2012 budget; the FY2011 budget included a 3% raise. Under
the City’s pay plan, about 15% of employees remain eligible for 3% merit-based pay raises.
The City continues to enjoy a very low employee turnover rate, which is an indicator that our salaries and
benefits are competitive with other area cities and private employers. Maintaining a competitive salary
and benefits plan is essential for retaining and recruiting quality employees.
Within the departmental budgets, the following changes are included:
• Relocation of Sanitation Department’s Neighborhood Integrity Officer to Community
Development Department.
• Addition of one new Sanitation worker position in Sanitation Department.
• Deletion of one position in Facilities Maintenance.
• Relocation of one Utility position from the Utility Billing Office to the Utilities Division.
• Conversion of full-time Purchasing Assistant in Finance to part-time position.
Benefit changes
Employee health insurance
No change is proposed for employee health insurance benefits or employee contributions. In calendar
2007-2011 and so far in 2012, the plan has operated at a surplus, and the Self-Insurance Fund’s balance
CategoryFY2012FY2013Change $Change %
Personnel costs$22,677,265$23,329,230$651,9652.87%
Treatment charges$6,737,339$7,242,506$505,1677.50%
Library$196,555$600,000$403,445205.26%
Capital projects$5,227,602$5,227,602 $00.00%
Electricity costs $627,253$626,000 ($1,253)‐0.20%
Equip. replacement$540,061$507,772 ($32,289)‐5.98%
Fuel costs $436,840$426,840 ($10,000)‐2.29%
Subtotal $36,442,915$37,959,950$1,517,0354.16%
Total budget $43,027,730$44,275,593$1,247,8632.90%
Percent of budget 84.70%85.74%
Major expenditure categories comparison
4
has grown. Maintaining the contributions to the fund seems to be a prudent and appropriate course.
Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) costs
The proposed FY2013 budget includes a contribution rate of 8.26%, down from 10.5% in FY2012. Last
year the rate declined from 13.87% to 10.5%. The FY2013 rate includes a cost of living adjustment
(COLA) for retirees and service credit update for current employees; without these the required rate
would be 6.8%. For many years the City has followed a policy of intermittently granting cost of living
adjustments for retired employees. This policy has helped keep the City’s TMRS rate low while
providing relief to its retirees from constant cost increases resulting from inflation. The City last adjusted
retiree benefits in FY2008.
Firefighters’ Relief and Retirement Fund (FRRF) costs
University Park Fire Department personnel belong to a separate retirement system that is governed by a
local board made up of three firefighters, two local residents, and two City representatives. The FRRF is
structured as a defined benefit plan and is currently underfunded on an actuarial basis, although its status
has improved due to changes in the plan.
In 2008 the firefighters voted to increase their own contribution rate from 10% of gross pay to 15% over a
three year period, beginning in FY2010. This move was designed to restore the plan to actuarial
soundness and ultimately match the City’s contribution rate of 15.54%.
In FY2011 and FY2012 the firefighters paid in 14% of gross salary, up from 12%. Since the 2008 plan
amendments, the FRRF plan has been changed so that employee contribution increases will only occur in
years when there is an overall pay increase. Consequently the firefighter contribution rate is expected to
rise to 15% for 2013.
TREATMENT CHARGES
University Park relies on two outside providers for treatment of water (DCPCMUD) and wastewater (City
of Dallas Water Utilities). Treatment charges comprise about half the cost of University Park’s water and
wastewater operation. The amount budgeted and expended for outside treatment can vary dramatically
from year to year, depending on volume and rate, and sometimes in different directions. For FY2013, the
cost of purchased water is projected to rise 12.7%, while wastewater costs are dropping 1.8%.
Water treatment
The MUD’s plan to finance the construction of their new membrane filter plant relies on a multi-year
series of rate increases. Fortunately, the rates proposed and adopted to date have been lower than initial
forecasts. For example, the rate for FY2013 is $2.2935 per 1,000 gallons, while the previous projection
was $2.4878. Similarly, the FY2012 rate of $2.0281 was originally projected to be $2.1709.
Although the projected volume of water to be purchased is decreasing for FY2013, the 13% rate increase
results in a $549,209 increase in budgeted water purchases:
FY2010FY2011FY2012 FY2013 Change $Change %
Rate per 1,000
gallons $1.783 $2.014$2.028 $2.294 $0.2713.09%
Forecast gallons
(000) 2,138,238 2,162,3372,135,813 2,128,216 (7,597) ‐0.36%
Budgeted
purchases $3,812,051$4,355,379$4,331,642 $4,881,063 $549,42112.68%
5
The chart on the next page depicts the impact of the MUD plant conversion on wholesale water rates.
As noted earlier, City staff is working currently to select a rate consultant.
Wastewater treatment
The other major treatment cost item is wastewater treatment, which is provided by the City of Dallas
Water Utilities. For FY2013, University Park will pay $2,361,443, down 1.84% from $2,405,697 in
FY2012. Compared with one year ago, consumption (monthly winter household water use) fell by 4.2%,
from 79,294,000 gallons to 75,960,000. This is multiplied against the proposed rate per 1,000 gallons (up
11.37%) and infiltration/inflow factor (down 7.99%).
LIBRARY
As mentioned, effective October 1, 2012 the University Park Library will become a full City operation.
Recruitment for a Library Director is currently underway, and a new Director should be appointed and in
place by early October. The current Director will remain until shortly after the first of the year, as a City
employee.
Retaining the outgoing Director is expected to aid in the move to the Library’s new space in Preston
Center. Construction on that location, which is on the second floor of a new office building, is on
schedule. Current plans are for the Library to relocate near the end of the year and open at Preston Center
in early January 2013.
The UP Public Library has been operated since 2001 by the not-for-profit University Park Friends of the
Library. The City supported the library financially; in recent years the Executive Department budget
included $196,555 for library support.
Now the library has been established as a new City department, and the FY2013 budget proposes a first-
year budget of $600,000. The Friends have agreed to fund $300,000 for the first year; ultimately the
Friends have agreed to provide $500,000 annually, if their capital campaign is successful. Consequently,
the net budget impact to the City for FY2013 is an expenditure increase of $103,445:
$1.207 $1.205 $1.316
$1.783
$2.014 $2.028
$2.294 $2.373 $2.347 $2.321
$0.000
$0.500
$1.000
$1.500
$2.000
$2.500
FY07FY08FY09FY10FY11FY12FY13FY14FY15FY16
MUD water rate per 1,000 gallons
6
CAPITAL PROJECT CONTRIBUTIONS
The FY2013 budget continues the City’s successful practice of funding its capital projects on a pay-as-
you-go rather than debt. As with the prior three years, no increases are proposed for the Utility Fund
contribution of $2,195,415 or the General Fund contribution of $3,032,187. These amounts are included
in the Transfers Departments in the General and Utility Funds.
The budgeted transfers and other sources help fund the City’s Capital Improvements Program (CIP), so
that in a given year the amount of project expenditure may be sharply higher or lower than the annual
budgeted contribution. The Capital Projects Review Committee will meet with City staff to consider the
capital budget for FY2013 and projections for FY2014-2017. Once approved by the City Council by
resolution, any subsequent changes to the FY2013 capital budget and five-year CIP must first be reviewed
by the Committee before being considered by the City Council.
ELECTRICITY, EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT, AND FUEL
Projected expenditures for these three categories are level or down slightly, reflecting a leveling off in
prices. The City purchases electricity via its membership in TCAP, the Texas Coalition for Affordable
Power. For FY2013 the budget includes $626,000 for electricity, compared with $627,253 in FY2012.
Budgeted contributions for replacement of motorized equipment total $507,772, versus $540,061 last
year. This is an internal charge that appears as expenditure in the user departments and revenue in the
Equipment Services Fund.
Fuel costs are projected to remain nearly the same for FY2013. The City is budgeting for $3.25 per
gallon for gasoline and $3.45 for diesel, compared with $3.00 and $3.40 in FY2011. Citywide FY2013
fuel purchases are projected to total $426,840 for FY2013, versus the FY2012 budget of $436,840.
FY2011FY2012FY2013 $ Change
Revenues$0$0$300,000 $300,000
Expenditures$196,555$196,555$600,000 $403,445
Net budget impact:($196,555)($196,555)($300,000)($103,445)
Library impact on City budget
7
DISCUSSION OF TAXES AND UTILITY RATES
GENERAL FUND
Revenue considerations
Non-property tax revenues comprise $11,484,621 of the City’s $27,286,305 General Fund revenue budget
and include everything from sales tax to franchise fees to swimming pool passes.
Sales tax
City sales tax revenues have improved consistently since FY2009 and are expected to exceed budget in
FY2012. The City’s sales tax consultants have continued to work at submitting requests for retroactive
recoveries of taxes distributed to other jurisdictions. The chart below displays recent sales tax history.
Building permits
Permit revenue in FY2012 has nearly matched FY2011’s extraordinary spike:
$3.46
$3.03 $3.03 $3.18 $3.34
$-
$0.50
$1.00
$1.50
$2.00
$2.50
$3.00
$3.50
$4.00
FY09FY10FY11FY12FY13
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
City Sales Tax Revenue FY2009‐FY2013
Budget Actual
$-
$0.50
$1.00
$1.50
$2.00
$2.50
$3.00
$3.50
FY2008FY2009FY2010FY2011FY2012FY2013
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
Building Permit Revenue FY2008‐FY2013
Budget Actual
8
The building permit revenue budget for the last five years has remained at $1,400,000 and is proposed to
stay there for FY2013. This practice prevents future year budgets from being dependent on an uncertain
or unstable level of permit revenue.
Property tax impact
The 2012 overall tax base of $5,587,424,812 is up for the first time since 2009. Interestingly, the 0.35%,
or $19,336,288, rise is solely due to $69,332,692 in new construction. Existing property declined very
slightly. Of the total tax base, residential property comprises 87% of the parcels and 93% of the value.
The FY2013 budget proposes to maintain the property tax rate at its current level, 27.845 cents per $100
taxable value. This will result in a budgeted property tax revenue increase of $53,842. The table below
compares this year with the past three:
The owner of a home whose value decreased by the citywide average would pay $1 less in City property
taxes, from $2,435 to $2,434. The owner of an average home with a homestead exemption whose value
did not change in assessed value this year would pay $2,435, the same as last year.
The proposed $0.27845 rate is below the effective tax rate (ETR) of $0.279174, just barely. The ETR is
the tax rate that would raise the same dollar amount of revenue as last year, on properties that were on the
tax roll in both years. The value of new construction is excluded from the ETR calculation. From an
ETR standpoint, total tax revenues are actually decreasing 0.26%.
Because the City’s proposed rate is lower than the ETR, the City is not required legally to hold the
additional public hearings required by State Truth in Taxation law. Even so, a second hearing has been
scheduled to provide the fullest opportunity for public review and comment.
UTILITY FUND
As described earlier in this memo, while the FY2013 budget does not propose increases to City retail
water or wastewater rates, these rates changes will be required in the near future. The comprehensive rate
Property tax rate comparison, FY2009 – FY2012
AdoptedAdoptedAdopted Proposed
Tax purposeFY2010FY2011FY2012 FY2013
Op. & Maint.0.26548 0.27845 0.27845 0.27845
Debt Service0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
Total Tax Rate0.26548 0.27845 0.27845 0.27845
Property tax levy comparison, FY2009 – FY2012
Assessed Value
(Market)
$1,189,311 $1,120,199 $1,093,015 $1,092,539
Less 20% Hmstd
Exmp
($237,862)($224,040)($218,603)($218,508)
Taxable Value $951,449 $896,159 $874,412 $874,032
Tax Rate per $100$0.26548 $0.27845 $0.27845 $0.27845
City Tax Levy $2,526 $2,495 $2,435 $2,434
Proposed
FY2013
Adopted
FY2010
Adopted
FY2011
Adopted
FY2012
9
study will provide a chance to factor in issues like conservation incentives and allocation of costs between
base and consumption elements of the rate.
Non-treatment related expenditures are proposed to increase to accommodate recent increased activity.
Actual expenditures for the Backfill Materials and Utility Main Maintenance accounts have averaged
$464,113 over the past three years; the proposed FY2013 budget for these accounts is $413,000, up from
$380,000 in FY2012.
SANITATION FUND
No change is proposed for City sanitation (solid waste and recycling collection) fees. Rates were last
increased in FY2009. The proposed FY2013 expenditure budget of $2,771,803 is down 3.37% from
$2,868,476 in FY2012. Reasons include lower personnel costs, reduced landfill budget, and lower
equipment replacement charges.
The Neighborhood Integrity Officer position is being moved from the Sanitation Department to the
Community Development Department. This reduction is offset by the addition of one new sanitation
worker position.
The revenue budget has been reduced 4.32% to reflect revenues more realistically. The FY2013 total is
$2,937,660, versus $3,070,451 last year. The Fund has a budgeted gain of $165,857, the result of
subtracting budgeted expenditures from revenues.
Consistent with past years, the Sanitation Budget contains a $100,000 placeholder (labeled “Disposal
Fees Contingency” in the line-item budget), which is intended to promote accumulation of reserves
toward future landfill needs.
CONCLUSION
The proposed budget is now ready for review by the Employee Benefits, Finance, and Insurance Advisory
Committees. Staff proposes the following schedule to satisfy the public hearing and notice requirements
for the FY2013 budget’s adoption:
Date Day Description
August 6/7 Tuesday Submit proposed budget to City Council and file with City
Secretary
August 21 Tuesday Receive staff briefing on budget and hold public hearing
August 28 Tuesday Hold second public hearing
September 4 Tuesday Adopt budget and related ordinances
October 1 Monday New budget takes effect
Staff looks forward to meeting with the City Council and advisory committees to discuss the budget in
more detail. We will be happy to provide any additional information that will be helpful during your
consideration.
10
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS
FY2013 PROPOSED BUDGET BY FUND AND DEPARTMENT
8/7/2012
Fund / Org Unit / Department
FY2011 Actual FY2012 Adopted
Budget
FY2013 Proposed
Budget $ Change% Change
GENERAL FUND
Revenues
01‐11 REVENUES$29,720,043$26,758,000$27,286,305$528,3051.97%
Total Revenues $29,720,043$26,758,000$27,286,305$528,3051.97%
Expenditures
01‐02 EXECUTIVE $1,166,906$1,187,135$947,218 ($239,917)‐20.21%
01‐03 FINANCE $1,192,3861,059,604$1,023,093 ($36,511)‐3.45%
01‐04 HUMAN RESOURCES $351,049363,849$354,043 ($9,806)‐2.70%
01‐05 INFORMATION SERVICES $918,087996,662$980,320 ($16,342)‐1.64%
01‐06 LIBRARY $0 0$600,000 $600,000#DIV/0!
01‐10 COURT $310,298331,720$341,706 $9,9863.01%
01‐19 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT $1,023,2811,016,899$1,155,595 $138,69613.64%
01‐20 ENGINEERING $777,939744,212$750,505 $6,2930.85%
01‐25 TRAFFIC $810,201848,934$862,322 $13,3881.58%
01‐35 FACILITY MAINTENANCE $748,700755,293$581,232 ($174,061)‐23.05%
01‐40 FIRE $4,957,7414,860,342$5,040,718 $180,3763.71%
01‐50 POLICE $6,509,9826,666,922$6,795,268 $128,3461.93%
01‐70 PARKS $2,819,7702,834,510$2,745,922 ($88,588)‐3.13%
01‐75 SWIMMING POOL $272,103269,583$275,869 $6,2862.33%
01‐80 STREETS $1,737,5301,756,234$1,775,323 $19,0891.09%
01‐85 TRANSFERS $3,407,1963,032,187$3,032,187 $00.00%
Total Expenditures $27,003,169$26,724,086$27,261,321$537,2352.01%
General Fund Surplus/(Deficit)$2,716,874$33,914$24,984 ($8,930)‐26.33%
UTILITY FUND
Revenues
02‐11 REVENUES 14,386,443$ $13,445,004$14,250,997$805,9935.99%
Total Revenues $14,386,44313,445,004$ 14,250,997$ $805,9935.99%
Expenditures
02‐21 UTILITY OFFICE $7,942,476$7,882,997$8,428,704 $545,7076.92%
02‐22 UTILITIES 3,505,3983,266,3063,365,480 $99,1743.04%
02‐23 STORM WATER 72,965 90,450252,870 $162,420179.57%
02‐85 TRANSFERS 2,195,4152,195,4152,195,415 $00.00%
Total Expenditures $13,716,254$13,435,168$14,242,469$807,3016.01%
Utility Fund Surplus/(Deficit)$670,189 $9,836 $8,528 ($1,308)‐13.30%
SANITATION FUND
Revenues
04‐11 REVENUES $2,953,835$3,070,451$2,937,660 ($132,791)‐4.32%
Total Revenues $2,953,835$3,070,451$2,937,660 ($132,791)‐4.32%
Expenditures
04‐60 SANITATION $2,686,568$2,868,476$2,771,803 ($96,673)‐3.37%
Total Expenditures $2,686,568$2,868,476$2,771,803 ($96,673)‐3.37%
Sanitation Fund Surplus/(Deficit)$267,267$201,975$165,857 ($36,118)‐17.88%
TOTAL REVENUES $47,060,321$43,273,455$44,474,962$1,201,5072.78%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 43,405,99143,027,73044,275,593$1,247,8632.90%
TOTAL SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)$3,654,330$245,725$199,369 ($46,356)
11
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS
FY2013 PROPOSED BUDGET
PROPERTY TAX IMPACT
8/7/2012
FY2012 FY2013
FY2011 ADOPTEDPROPOSEDDOLLARPERCENT
ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGETCHANGECHANGE
TOTAL CERTIFIED TAXABLE VALUE 5,707,112,954$ 5,568,088,524$ 5,587,424,812$ 19,336,288$ 0.34%
TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUES NEEDED:27,003,169$ 26,758,000$ 27,286,305$ 528,305$ 1.96%
NON PROPERTY TAX REVENUE
Sales tax 3,479,629$ 3,178,851$ 3,338,000$ 159,149$ 4.57%
Franchise fees 2,207,303 1,910,000 2,050,000 140,000$ 6.34%
Building permits 2,846,125 1,400,000 1,400,000 ‐$ 0.00%
Traffic/parking fines 458,721 531,000 556,000 25,000$ 5.45%
Service charges 790,735 1,042,730 865,055 (177,675)$ ‐22.47%
Direct alarm monitoring fees 799,884 819,000 866,989 47,989$ 6.00%
Interest income 202,120 265,000 265,000 ‐$ 0.00%
Utility Fund contribution 600,000 600,000 600,000 ‐$ 0.00%
Miscellaneous 2,370,927 1,263,077 1,543,077 280,000$ 11.81%
TOTAL NON PROPERTY TAX REV.13,755,444$ 11,009,658$ 11,484,121$ 474,463$ 3.45%
PROPERTY TAX REVENUE
Operations & Maintenance (O&M) need 15,786,241$ 15,504,342$ 15,558,184$ 53,842$ 0.34%
Penalty/interest & attorney's fees 119,527 145,000 145,000 ‐$ 0.00%
Delinquent (prior years) taxes 58,835 99,000 99,000 ‐$ 0.00%
TOTAL PROP TAX OP REQUEST 15,964,603$ 15,748,342$ 15,802,184$ 53,842$ 0.34%
‐$
REVENUES LESS EXPENDITURES 2,716,878 ‐ ‐ ‐
‐$
DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENT ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ #DIV/0!
‐$
PROPERTY TAX RATE ‐$
Operations & Maintenance (O&M)0.27661$ 0.27845$ 0.27845$ 0$ 0.00%
Debt Service ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐$ #DIV/0!
Total Property Tax Rate per $100 0.27661$ 0.27845$ 0.27845$ 0.00000$ 0.00%
IMPACT ON HOMEOWNER
Average single‐family market value $1,120,199$1,093,015$1,092,539 ‐$476 ‐0.04%
Less: 20% homestead exemption $224,040$218,603$218,508 ‐$95 ‐0.04%
Average single‐family taxable value $896,159$874,412$874,032 ‐$381 ‐0.04%
Tax levy $2,479 $2,435$2,433.74 ‐$1 ‐0.04%
Increase in levy over prior year ‐$47 ‐$44 ‐$1
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
01
‐02
EX
E
C
U
T
I
V
E
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
10
0
1
RE
G
U
L
A
R
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
$4
5
0
,
3
3
4
$
4
5
7
,
6
6
7
$
4
7
7
,
2
1
0
$
1
9
,
5
4
3
4.27%
10
0
2
OV
E
R
T
I
M
E
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
$0
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
10
0
5
LO
N
G
E
V
I
T
Y
PA
Y
$2
,
2
2
7
$
2
,
8
4
8
$
3
,
1
3
4
$2
8
6
10
.
0
4
%
10
0
7
CA
R
AL
L
O
W
A
N
C
E
$7
,
2
0
0
$
7
,
2
0
0
$
7
,
2
0
0
$0
0.00%
11
1
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
SH
A
R
E
F.
I
.
C
.
A
.
$2
9
,
1
2
5
$
3
0
,
5
3
6
$
3
1
,
8
7
1
$
1
,
3
3
5
4.37%
11
2
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
SH
A
R
E
T.
M
.
R
.
S
.
$6
3
,
0
7
0
$
4
8
,
1
9
8
$
3
9
,
5
3
5
(
$
8
,
6
6
3
)
‐17
.
9
7
%
11
2
7
RE
T
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
SU
P
P
L
E
M
E
N
T
A
L
$4
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
0
,
0
0
0
$0
0.00%
11
3
0
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐EM
P
L
O
Y
E
E
LI
F
E
$2
,
9
9
2
$
2
,
9
7
9
$
3
,
1
2
7
$1
4
8
4.97%
11
3
1
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐WO
R
K
M
E
N
S
CO
M
P
$6
1
6
$6
0
8
$5
3
6
($
7
2
)
‐11
.
8
4
%
11
3
5
HE
A
L
T
H
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
$5
4
,
0
0
0
$
4
5
,
0
0
0
$
4
5
,
0
0
0
$0
0.00%
SA
L
A
R
I
E
S
& BE
N
E
F
I
T
S
$6
4
9
,
5
6
4
$6
3
5
,
0
3
6
$6
4
7
,
6
1
3
$
1
2
,
5
7
7
1.98%
21
0
0
OF
F
I
C
E
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$2
,
9
9
9
$
3
,
3
2
1
$
3
,
3
2
1
$0
0.00%
23
1
8
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$0
$
1
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
$0
0.00%
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$2
,
9
9
9
$
4
,
3
2
1
$
4
,
3
2
1
$0
0.00%
30
0
3
BO
A
R
D
ME
E
T
I
N
G
S
$9
,
6
3
6
$
1
3
,
5
6
0
$
1
0
,
5
6
0
(
$
3
,
0
0
0
)
‐22
.
1
2
%
30
1
0
PO
S
T
A
G
E
$2
,
1
1
8
$
2
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
1
0
0
$1
0
0
5.00%
30
1
4
PU
B
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
$0
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
30
6
0
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$3
3
6
,
4
6
9
$
3
8
6
,
0
5
0
$
1
3
9
,
2
9
5
(
$
2
4
6
,
7
5
5
)
‐63
.
9
2
%
30
6
3
PR
O
G
R
A
M
M
I
N
G
/
M
A
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$3
1
,
8
0
9
$
3
1
,
6
7
4
$
3
3
,
4
8
8
$
1
,
8
1
4
5.73%
31
1
3
PR
I
N
T
I
N
G
$2
0
,
2
9
2
$
2
0
,
8
2
6
$
2
0
,
8
2
6
$0
0.00%
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$4
0
0
,
3
2
4
$
4
5
4
,
1
1
0
$
2
0
6
,
2
6
9
(
$
2
4
7
,
8
4
1
)
‐54
.
5
8
%
41
1
0
HE
A
T
,
L
I
G
H
T
,
W
A
T
E
R
UT
I
L
$1
1
,
2
9
1
$
1
2
,
3
2
0
$
1
0
,
6
0
0
(
$
1
,
7
2
0
)
‐13
.
9
6
%
41
2
0
TE
L
E
P
H
O
N
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
$5
,
6
9
4
$
5
,
7
9
4
$
6
,
4
5
6
$6
6
2
11
.
4
3
%
UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
$1
6
,
9
8
5
$
1
8
,
1
1
4
$
1
7
,
0
5
6
(
$
1
,
0
5
8
)
‐5.84%
55
0
6
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐GE
N
E
R
A
L
LI
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
$9
1
5
$3
2
9
$3
2
9
$0
0.00%
55
1
4
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐PU
B
L
.
O
F
F
L
LI
A
B
$4
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
8
,
0
0
0
$
2
8
,
0
0
0
$0
0.00%
55
1
6
BO
N
D
S
‐OF
F
I
C
A
L
S
& EM
P
L
O
Y
E
E
$2
0
0
$2
0
0
$2
0
0
$0
0.00%
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
$4
6
,
1
1
5
$
2
8
,
5
2
9
$
2
8
,
5
2
9
$0
0.00%
62
0
0
EQ
U
I
P
RE
P
A
I
R
S
/
N
O
N
VE
H
I
C
L
E
$0
$6
0
0
$6
0
0
$0
0.00%
01
-
0
2
E
X
E
C
U
T
I
V
E
1 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
01
‐02
EX
E
C
U
T
I
V
E
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
OU
T
S
I
D
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$0
$6
0
0
$6
0
0
$0
0.00%
71
5
0
DU
E
S
& SU
B
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
$1
4
,
7
0
4
$
1
4
,
1
7
0
$
1
4
,
2
7
5
$1
0
5
0.74%
71
7
0
TR
A
V
E
L
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$3
,
9
5
4
$
9
,
2
6
0
$
7
,
2
6
0
(
$
2
,
0
0
0
)
‐21
.
6
0
%
72
0
1
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
BE
L
O
W
$5
0
0
0
$5
,
7
8
5
$5
0
0
$
1
,
8
0
0
$
1
,
3
0
0
26
0
.
0
0
%
72
0
2
MI
C
R
O
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
SO
F
T
W
A
R
E
$1
4
8
$
1
,
0
0
0
$0
(
$
1
,
0
0
0
)
‐10
0
.
0
0
%
72
2
1
OT
H
E
R
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$2
,
8
5
9
$
4
,
6
5
0
$
4
,
6
5
0
$0
0.00%
72
3
5
YO
U
T
H
AD
V
I
S
O
R
Y
CO
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
$1
,
1
9
4
$
1
,
5
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
$0
0.00%
72
4
0
TU
I
T
I
O
N
& TR
A
I
N
I
N
G
$1
,
8
2
2
$
4
,
8
4
5
$
2
,
8
4
5
(
$
2
,
0
0
0
)
‐41
.
2
8
%
74
3
2
EL
E
C
T
I
O
N
S
$2
0
,
4
5
3
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$0
0.00%
74
7
5
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
‐‐
UN
D
E
R
$5
0
0
0
$0
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
OT
H
E
R
$5
0
,
9
1
9
$
4
5
,
9
2
5
$
4
2
,
3
3
0
(
$
3
,
5
9
5
)
‐7.83%
91
0
0
OF
F
I
C
E
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
$0
$5
0
0
$5
0
0
$0
0.00%
92
0
1
MI
C
R
O
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
$0
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
99
1
0
OF
F
I
C
E
FU
R
N
I
T
U
R
E
$0
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
CA
P
I
T
A
L
EX
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
S
$0
$5
0
0
$5
0
0
$0
0.00%
TO
T
A
L
EX
E
C
U
T
I
V
E
$1
,
1
6
6
,
9
0
6
$
1
,
1
8
7
,
1
3
5
$
9
4
7
,
2
1
8
(
$
2
3
9
,
9
1
7
)
‐20
.
2
1
%
01
-
0
2
E
X
E
C
U
T
I
V
E
2 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
01
‐03
FI
N
A
N
C
E
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
10
0
1
RE
G
U
L
A
R
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
$5
6
8
,
7
6
4
$
5
6
9
,
6
7
2
$
5
7
2
,
0
8
1
$
2
,
4
0
9
0.
4
2
%
10
0
2
OV
E
R
T
I
M
E
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
$2
6
8
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
10
0
5
LO
N
G
E
V
I
T
Y
PA
Y
$5
,
2
5
4
$
5
,
5
8
1
$
5
,
3
0
1
(
$
2
8
0
)
‐5.
0
2
%
10
0
7
CA
R
AL
L
O
W
A
N
C
E
$7
,
2
0
0
$
7
,
2
0
0
$
7
,
2
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
11
1
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
SH
A
R
E
F.
I
.
C
.
A
.
$4
0
,
4
3
2
$
4
1
,
6
5
9
$
4
1
,
6
9
7
$3
8
0.
0
9
%
11
2
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
SH
A
R
E
T.
M
.
R
.
S
.
$8
0
,
7
2
1
$
6
1
,
1
5
6
$
4
8
,
2
8
7
(
$
1
2
,
8
6
9
)
‐21
.
0
4
%
11
3
0
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐EM
P
L
O
Y
E
E
LI
F
E
$3
,
8
6
7
$
3
,
8
4
5
$
3
,
6
3
1
(
$
2
1
4
)
‐5.
5
7
%
11
3
1
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐WO
R
K
M
E
N
S
CO
M
P
$7
2
5
$7
5
7
$6
4
3
(
$
1
1
4
)
‐15
.
0
6
%
11
3
5
HE
A
L
T
H
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
$6
3
,
0
0
0
$5
4
,
0
0
0
$4
9
,
5
0
0
(
$
4
,
5
0
0
)
‐8.
3
3
%
SA
L
A
R
I
E
S
& BE
N
E
F
I
T
S
$7
7
0
,
2
3
1
$
7
4
3
,
8
7
0
$
7
2
8
,
3
4
0
(
$
1
5
,
5
3
0
)
‐2.
0
9
%
21
0
0
OF
F
I
C
E
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$4
,
6
2
6
$
5
,
5
5
0
$
5
,
5
6
0
$1
0
0.
1
8
%
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$4
,
6
2
6
$
5
,
5
5
0
$
5
,
5
6
0
$1
0
0.
1
8
%
30
0
7
DE
L
I
N
Q
U
E
N
T
TA
X
AT
T
O
R
N
E
Y
$2
1
,
0
5
0
$
2
9
,
0
0
0
$
2
9
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
30
1
0
PO
S
T
A
G
E
$2
,
0
3
7
$
2
,
1
0
0
$
2
,
0
0
0
(
$
1
0
0
)
‐4.
7
6
%
30
6
0
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$1
9
5
,
5
8
9
$
8
6
,
5
8
0
$
7
1
,
9
0
0
(
$
1
4
,
6
8
0
)
‐16
.
9
6
%
30
6
3
PR
O
G
R
A
M
M
I
N
G
/
M
A
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$4
7
,
2
2
0
$
3
8
,
3
9
6
$
3
9
,
1
6
1
$7
6
5
1.
9
9
%
31
1
3
PR
I
N
T
I
N
G
$5
,
5
3
9
$
6
,
3
5
0
$
6
,
3
5
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
31
4
1
DA
L
L
A
S
CO
TA
X
CO
L
L
SE
R
V
$1
1
,
2
5
8
$
1
1
,
4
2
0
$
1
1
,
4
2
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
31
4
5
CE
N
T
R
A
L
AP
P
R
A
I
S
A
L
DI
S
T
R
I
C
$7
5
,
7
1
6
$
7
7
,
7
4
5
$
7
5
,
9
5
7
(
$
1
,
7
8
8
)
‐2.
3
0
%
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$3
5
8
,
4
0
9
$
2
5
1
,
5
9
1
$
2
3
5
,
7
8
8
(
$
1
5
,
8
0
3
)
‐6.
2
8
%
41
1
0
HE
A
T
,
L
I
G
H
T
,
W
A
T
E
R
UT
I
L
$8
,
3
5
1
$
9
,
1
4
4
$
7
,
5
0
0
(
$
1
,
6
4
4
)
‐17
.
9
8
%
41
2
0
TE
L
E
P
H
O
N
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
$5
,
3
4
0
$
5
,
2
8
8
$
5
,
5
0
1
$2
1
3
4.
0
3
%
UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
$1
3
,
6
9
1
$
1
4
,
4
3
2
$
1
3
,
0
0
1
(
$
1
,
4
3
1
)
‐9.
9
2
%
55
0
6
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐GE
N
E
R
A
L
LI
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
$1
,
2
6
5
$4
5
6
$4
5
6
$0
0.
0
0
%
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
$1
,
2
6
5
$4
5
6
$4
5
6
$0
0.
0
0
%
62
0
0
EQ
U
I
P
RE
P
A
I
R
S
/
N
O
N
VE
H
I
C
L
E
$1
,
2
5
0
$
1
,
0
1
0
$
1
,
0
1
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
OU
T
S
I
D
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$1
,
2
5
0
$
1
,
0
1
0
$
1
,
0
1
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
71
5
0
DU
E
S
& SU
B
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
$1
4
,
4
6
3
$
8
,
5
3
5
$
1
5
,
1
0
0
$
6
,
5
6
5
76
.
9
2
%
01
-
0
3
F
I
N
A
N
C
E
3 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
01
‐03
FI
N
A
N
C
E
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
71
7
0
TR
A
V
E
L
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$8
,
4
0
1
$
1
1
,
2
5
5
$
1
0
,
0
9
5
(
$
1
,
1
6
0
)
‐10
.
3
1
%
72
0
1
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
BE
L
O
W
$5
0
0
0
$7
,
2
9
2
$
8
,
0
9
7
$
1
,
0
0
0
($7
,
0
9
7
)
‐87
.
6
5
%
72
0
2
MI
C
R
O
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
SO
F
T
W
A
R
E
$0
$
4
,
1
7
8
$
2
,
7
9
8
(
$
1
,
3
8
0
)
‐33
.
0
3
%
72
2
1
OT
H
E
R
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$5
,
0
4
7
$
5
,
9
1
5
$
5
,
9
1
5
$0
0.
0
0
%
72
4
0
TU
I
T
I
O
N
& TR
A
I
N
I
N
G
$7
,
7
1
3
$
4
,
7
1
5
$
4
,
0
3
0
(
$
6
8
5
)
‐14
.
5
3
%
OT
H
E
R
$4
2
,
9
1
6
$
4
2
,
6
9
5
$
3
8
,
9
3
8
(
$
3
,
7
5
7
)
‐8.
8
0
%
92
0
1
MI
C
R
O
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
$0
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
CA
P
I
T
A
L
EX
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
S
$0
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
TO
T
A
L
FI
N
A
N
C
E
$1
,
1
9
2
,
3
8
8
$
1
,
0
5
9
,
6
0
4
$
1
,
0
2
3
,
0
9
3
(
$
3
6
,
5
1
1
)
‐3.
4
5
%
01
-
0
3
F
I
N
A
N
C
E
4 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
01
‐04
HU
M
A
N
RE
S
O
U
R
C
E
S
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
10
0
1
RE
G
U
L
A
R
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
$1
8
2
,
0
2
5
$
1
8
3
,
3
8
8
$
1
9
1
,
2
0
9
$
7
,
8
2
1
4.
2
6
%
10
0
5
LO
N
G
E
V
I
T
Y
PA
Y
$1
,
7
8
2
$
1
,
8
7
4
$
1
,
9
5
3
$7
9
4.
2
2
%
10
0
7
CA
R
AL
L
O
W
A
N
C
E
$7
,
2
0
0
$
7
,
2
0
0
$
7
,
2
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
11
1
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
SH
A
R
E
F.
I
.
C
.
A
.
$1
2
,
6
0
0
$
1
2
,
8
2
4
$
1
3
,
3
5
9
$5
3
5
4.
1
7
%
11
2
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
SH
A
R
E
T.
M
.
R
.
S
.
$2
6
,
4
6
9
$
2
0
,
2
0
8
$
1
6
,
5
5
0
(
$
3
,
6
5
8
)
‐18
.
1
0
%
11
3
0
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐EM
P
L
O
Y
E
E
LI
F
E
$1
,
2
2
9
$
1
,
2
1
5
$
1
,
2
7
6
$6
1
5.
0
2
%
11
3
1
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐WO
R
K
M
E
N
S
CO
M
P
$2
3
3
$2
5
1
$2
2
0
($
3
1
)
‐12
.
3
5
%
11
3
5
HE
A
L
T
H
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
$1
8
,
0
0
0
$
1
8
,
0
0
0
$
1
8
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
SA
L
A
R
I
E
S
& BE
N
E
F
I
T
S
$2
4
9
,
5
3
8
$
2
4
4
,
9
6
0
$
2
4
9
,
7
6
7
$
4
,
8
0
7
1.
9
6
%
21
0
0
OF
F
I
C
E
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$9
0
5
$1
,
4
5
0
$1
,
4
5
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
23
1
8
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$7
1
$7
5
0
$
1
,
3
0
0
$5
5
0
73
.
3
3
%
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$9
7
6
$
2
,
2
0
0
$
2
,
7
5
0
$5
5
0
25
.
0
0
%
30
1
0
PO
S
T
A
G
E
$2
0
4
$3
4
8
$2
7
5
($
7
3
)
‐20
.
9
8
%
30
6
0
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$1
9
,
2
7
7
$
3
0
,
4
6
0
$
2
3
,
1
9
0
(
$
7
,
2
7
0
)
‐23
.
8
7
%
30
6
3
PR
O
G
R
A
M
M
I
N
G
/
M
A
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$1
0
,
1
1
2
$
9
,
1
7
4
$
9
,
4
6
9
$2
9
5
3.
2
2
%
31
1
3
PR
I
N
T
I
N
G
$1
3
7
$1
0
0
$1
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$2
9
,
7
3
0
$
4
0
,
0
8
2
$
3
3
,
0
3
4
(
$
7
,
0
4
8
)
‐17
.
5
8
%
41
1
0
HE
A
T
,
L
I
G
H
T
,
W
A
T
E
R
UT
I
L
$4
,
8
3
9
$
5
,
2
8
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
(
$
2
8
0
)
‐5.
3
0
%
41
2
0
TE
L
E
P
H
O
N
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
$2
,
9
3
3
$
3
,
0
8
2
$
3
,
4
2
5
$3
4
3
11
.
1
3
%
UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
$7
,
7
7
2
$
8
,
3
6
2
$
8
,
4
2
5
$6
3
0.
7
5
%
55
0
6
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐GE
N
E
R
A
L
LI
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
$4
6
7
$1
6
8
$1
6
8
$0
0.
0
0
%
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
$4
6
7
$1
6
8
$1
6
8
$0
0.
0
0
%
62
0
0
EQ
U
I
P
RE
P
A
I
R
S
/
N
O
N
VE
H
I
C
L
E
$0
$1
5
0
$1
5
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
OU
T
S
I
D
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$0
$1
5
0
$1
5
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
71
1
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
E
RE
C
O
G
N
I
T
I
O
N
$1
1
,
8
6
7
$
1
3
,
1
5
0
$
1
5
,
6
2
0
$
2
,
4
7
0
18
.
7
8
%
71
5
0
DU
E
S
& SU
B
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
$1
,
9
3
5
$
2
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
1
6
4
$1
6
4
8.
2
0
%
71
7
0
TR
A
V
E
L
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$1
,
4
2
2
$
1
,
9
6
0
$
1
,
8
5
0
(
$
1
1
0
)
‐5.
6
1
%
72
0
1
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
BE
L
O
W
$5
0
0
0
$1
,
4
4
4
$8
6
2
$5
0
0
(
$
3
6
2
)
‐42
.
0
0
%
01
-
0
4
H
U
M
A
N
R
E
S
O
U
R
C
E
S
5 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
01
‐04
HU
M
A
N
RE
S
O
U
R
C
E
S
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
72
2
1
OT
H
E
R
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$6
,
7
5
4
$
7
,
5
0
0
$
7
,
0
5
0
(
$
4
5
0
)
‐6.
0
0
%
72
4
0
TU
I
T
I
O
N
& TR
A
I
N
I
N
G
$1
,
5
0
0
$
2
,
4
5
5
$
2
,
5
6
5
$1
1
0
4.
4
8
%
72
4
5
TU
I
T
I
O
N
RE
I
M
B
U
R
S
E
M
E
N
T
$3
7
,
6
4
5
$
4
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
0
,
0
0
0
(
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
)
‐25
.
0
0
%
74
7
5
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
‐UN
D
E
R
$5
0
0
0
$0
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
OT
H
E
R
$6
2
,
5
6
7
$
6
7
,
9
2
7
$
5
9
,
7
4
9
(
$
8
,
1
7
8
)
‐12
.
0
4
%
92
0
1
MI
C
R
O
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
$0
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
CA
P
I
T
A
L
EX
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
S
$0
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
TO
T
A
L
HU
M
A
N
RE
S
O
U
R
C
E
S
$3
5
1
,
0
5
0
$
3
6
3
,
8
4
9
$
3
5
4
,
0
4
3
(
$
9
,
8
0
6
)
‐2.
7
0
%
01
-
0
4
H
U
M
A
N
R
E
S
O
U
R
C
E
S
6 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
01
‐05
IN
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
10
0
1
RE
G
U
L
A
R
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
$4
4
6
,
6
0
5
$
4
5
1
,
3
8
1
$
4
6
6
,
5
3
0
$
1
5
,
1
4
9
3.
3
6
%
10
0
5
LO
N
G
E
V
I
T
Y
PA
Y
$1
,
8
7
1
$
2
,
1
0
9
$
2
,
3
4
5
$2
3
6
11
.
1
9
%
10
0
7
CA
R
AL
L
O
W
A
N
C
E
$7
,
2
0
0
$
7
,
2
0
0
$
7
,
2
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
10
0
9
CE
L
L
PH
O
N
E
AL
L
O
W
A
N
C
E
$7
8
5
$
1
,
2
0
0
$
1
,
2
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
11
1
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
SH
A
R
E
F.
I
.
C
.
A
.
$3
2
,
2
5
5
$
3
4
,
2
0
9
$
3
5
,
3
4
1
$
1
,
1
3
2
3.
3
1
%
11
2
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
SH
A
R
E
T.
M
.
R
.
S
.
$6
3
,
4
1
8
$
4
8
,
4
9
9
$
3
9
,
4
2
3
(
$
9
,
0
7
6
)
‐18
.
7
1
%
11
3
0
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐EM
P
L
O
Y
E
E
LI
F
E
$2
,
9
0
6
$
2
,
4
3
8
$
3
,
1
1
5
$6
7
7
27
.
7
7
%
11
3
1
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐WO
R
K
M
E
N
S
CO
M
P
$5
3
2
$6
0
1
$5
2
5
($
7
6
)
‐12
.
6
5
%
11
3
5
HE
A
L
T
H
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
$4
5
,
0
0
0
$
4
5
,
0
0
0
$
4
5
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
SA
L
A
R
I
E
S
& BE
N
E
F
I
T
S
$6
0
0
,
5
7
2
$5
9
2
,
6
3
7
$6
0
0
,
6
7
9
$8
,
0
4
2
1.
3
6
%
21
0
0
OF
F
I
C
E
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$6
4
8
$
1
,
5
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
23
1
8
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$1
,
9
2
6
$
1
2
,
8
4
2
$
1
2
,
0
2
9
(
$
8
1
3
)
‐6.
3
3
%
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$2
,
5
7
4
$
1
4
,
3
4
2
$
1
3
,
5
2
9
($
8
1
3
)
‐5.
6
7
%
30
1
0
PO
S
T
A
G
E
$1
1
7
$1
3
9
$1
2
0
($
1
9
)
‐13
.
6
7
%
30
6
0
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$3
4
,
9
4
6
$
4
1
,
9
1
0
$
3
6
,
4
0
0
(
$
5
,
5
1
0
)
‐13
.
1
5
%
30
6
3
PR
O
G
R
A
M
M
I
N
G
/
M
A
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$1
0
9
,
3
8
4
$
1
1
7
,
8
7
3
$
1
1
2
,
2
8
5
(
$
5
,
5
8
8
)
‐4.
7
4
%
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$1
4
4
,
4
4
7
$
1
5
9
,
9
2
2
$
1
4
8
,
8
0
5
($
1
1
,
1
1
7
)
‐6.
9
5
%
41
1
0
HE
A
T
,
L
I
G
H
T
,
W
A
T
E
R
UT
I
L
$7
,
7
2
3
$
8
,
5
1
4
$
7
,
3
0
0
(
$
1
,
2
1
4
)
‐14
.
2
6
%
41
2
0
TE
L
E
P
H
O
N
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
$8
1
,
8
9
2
$
1
0
3
,
0
2
4
$
1
0
0
,
5
5
8
(
$
2
,
4
6
6
)
‐2.
3
9
%
UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
$8
9
,
6
1
5
$
1
1
1
,
5
3
8
$
1
0
7
,
8
5
8
($
3
,
6
8
0
)
‐3.
3
0
%
55
0
6
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐GE
N
E
R
A
L
LI
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
$5
5
2
$1
9
9
$1
9
9
$0
0.
0
0
%
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
$5
5
2
$1
9
9
$1
9
9
$0
0.
0
0
%
62
0
0
EQ
U
I
P
RE
P
A
I
R
S
/
N
O
N
VE
H
I
C
L
E
$3
3
,
0
3
8
$
4
3
,
3
1
5
$
3
4
,
9
9
3
(
$
8
,
3
2
2
)
‐19
.
2
1
%
OU
T
S
I
D
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$3
3
,
0
3
8
$
4
3
,
3
1
5
$
3
4
,
9
9
3
($
8
,
3
2
2
)
‐19
.
2
1
%
71
5
0
DU
E
S
& SU
B
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
$3
4
7
$3
3
5
$6
3
5
$3
0
0
89
.
5
5
%
71
7
0
TR
A
V
E
L
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$3
,
1
9
4
$
1
4
,
8
3
0
$
1
5
,
4
4
5
$6
1
5
4.
1
5
%
72
0
1
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
BE
L
O
W
$5
0
0
0
$8
,
2
7
8
$
2
3
,
2
9
4
$
2
7
,
4
7
0
$
4
,
1
7
6
17
.
9
3
%
72
0
2
MI
C
R
O
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
SO
F
T
W
A
R
E
$1
,
0
2
8
$
1
,
6
2
0
$
1
,
6
2
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
01
-
0
5
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S
7 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
01
‐05
IN
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
72
2
1
OT
H
E
R
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$2
1
1
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
72
4
0
TU
I
T
I
O
N
& TR
A
I
N
I
N
G
$2
,
8
3
5
$
1
5
,
6
3
0
$
1
9
,
0
8
7
$
3
,
4
5
7
22
.
1
2
%
OT
H
E
R
$1
5
,
8
9
3
$
5
5
,
7
0
9
$
6
4
,
2
5
7
$8
,
5
4
8
15
.
3
4
%
92
0
1
MI
C
R
O
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
$3
1
,
3
9
5
$
1
9
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
(
$
9
,
0
0
0
)
‐47
.
3
7
%
CA
P
I
T
A
L
EX
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
S
$3
1
,
3
9
5
$
1
9
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
($
9
,
0
0
0
)
‐47
.
3
7
%
TO
T
A
L
IN
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$9
1
8
,
0
8
6
$
9
9
6
,
6
6
2
$
9
8
0
,
3
2
0
($
1
6
,
3
4
2
)
‐1.
6
4
%
01
-
0
5
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S
8 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
01
‐06
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
10
0
1
RE
G
U
L
A
R
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
$0
$0
$
3
1
9
,
1
3
9
$
3
1
9
,
1
3
9
#
D
I
V
/
0
!
10
0
7
CA
R
AL
L
O
W
A
N
C
E
$0
$0
$
7
,
5
0
0
$
7
,
5
0
0
#
D
I
V
/
0
!
11
1
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
SH
A
R
E
F.
I
.
C
.
A
.
$0
$0
$
2
2
,
0
4
8
$
2
2
,
0
4
8
#
D
I
V
/
0
!
11
2
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
SH
A
R
E
T.
M
.
R
.
S
.
$0
$0
$
3
1
,
0
1
4
$
3
1
,
0
1
4
#
D
I
V
/
0
!
11
3
0
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐EM
P
L
O
Y
E
E
LI
F
E
$0
$0
$
1
,
7
3
1
$
1
,
7
3
1
#
D
I
V
/
0
!
11
3
1
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐WO
R
K
E
R
S
CO
M
P
$0
$0
$3
3
6
$3
3
6
#
D
I
V
/
0
!
11
3
5
HE
A
L
T
H
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
$0
$0
$9
,
0
0
0
$9
,
0
0
0
#
D
I
V
/
0
!
SA
L
A
R
I
E
S
& BE
N
E
F
I
T
S
$0
$0
$
3
9
0
,
7
6
8
$
3
9
0
,
7
6
8
#
D
I
V
/
0
!
21
0
0
OF
F
I
C
E
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$0
$0
$5
,
5
0
0
$5
,
5
0
0
#
D
I
V
/
0
!
23
5
0
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
& MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
$0
$0
$6
,
5
3
2
$6
,
5
3
2
#
D
I
V
/
0
!
23
5
5
MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
BU
D
G
E
T
$0
$0
$
8
4
,
5
0
0
$8
4
,
5
0
0
#
D
I
V
/
0
!
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$0
$0
$
9
6
,
5
3
2
$9
6
,
5
3
2
#
D
I
V
/
0
!
30
1
0
PO
S
T
A
G
E
$0
$0
$1
,
0
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
#
D
I
V
/
0
!
30
6
0
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$0
$0
$4
,
0
0
0
$4
,
0
0
0
#
D
I
V
/
0
!
30
6
3
PR
O
G
R
A
M
M
I
N
G
/
M
A
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$0
$0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$2
5
,
0
0
0
#
D
I
V
/
0
!
31
1
3
PR
I
N
T
I
N
G
$0
$0
$3
,
0
0
0
$3
,
0
0
0
#
D
I
V
/
0
!
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$0
$0
$3
3
,
0
0
0
$3
3
,
0
0
0
#
D
I
V
/
0
!
41
1
0
HE
A
T
,
L
I
G
H
T
,
W
A
T
E
R
UT
I
L
$0
$0
$6
0
,
0
0
0
$6
0
,
0
0
0
#
D
I
V
/
0
!
41
2
0
TE
L
E
P
H
O
N
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
$0
$0
$5
,
3
0
0
$5
,
3
0
0
#
D
I
V
/
0
!
UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
$0
$0
$6
5
,
3
0
0
$6
5
,
3
0
0
#
D
I
V
/
0
!
55
0
6
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐GE
N
'
L
LI
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
$0
$0
$2
,
5
0
0
$2
,
5
0
0
#
D
I
V
/
0
!
55
1
0
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
& CO
N
T
E
N
T
S
$0
$0
$2
,
5
0
0
$2
,
5
0
0
#
D
I
V
/
0
!
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
$0
$0
$5
,
0
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
#
D
I
V
/
0
!
62
0
0
EQ
U
I
P
RE
P
A
I
R
S
/
N
O
N
VE
H
I
C
L
E
$0
$0
$5
0
0
$5
0
0
#
D
I
V
/
0
!
OU
T
S
I
D
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$0
$0
$5
0
0
$5
0
0
#
D
I
V
/
0
!
71
5
0
DU
E
S
& SU
B
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
$0
$0
$4
0
0
$4
0
0
#
D
I
V
/
0
!
71
7
0
TR
A
V
E
L
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$0
$0
$2
,
0
0
0
$2
,
0
0
0
#
D
I
V
/
0
!
01
-
0
6
L
I
B
R
A
R
Y
9 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
01
‐06
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
72
0
1
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
< $5
0
0
0
$0
$
0
$1
,
0
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
#
D
I
V
/
0
!
72
0
2
MI
C
R
O
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
SO
F
T
W
A
R
E
$0
$
0
$1
,
0
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
#
D
I
V
/
0
!
72
2
1
OT
H
E
R
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$0
$0
$2
,
5
0
0
$2
,
5
0
0
#
D
I
V
/
0
!
72
4
0
TU
I
T
I
O
N
& TR
A
I
N
I
N
G
$0
$0
$2
,
0
0
0
$2
,
0
0
0
#
D
I
V
/
0
!
OT
H
E
R
$0
$0
$8
,
9
0
0
$8
,
9
0
0
#
D
I
V
/
0
!
91
0
0
OF
F
I
C
E
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
$0
$0
$0
$0
#
D
I
V
/
0
!
CA
P
I
T
A
L
EX
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
S
$0
$0
$0
$0
#
D
I
V
/
0
!
TO
T
A
L
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
$0
$0
$
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
01
-
0
6
L
I
B
R
A
R
Y
10 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
01
‐10
CO
U
R
T
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
10
0
1
RE
G
U
L
A
R
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
$1
8
9
,
8
8
3
$
1
9
1
,
0
0
6
$
1
9
8
,
6
5
3
$
7
,
6
4
7
4.
0
0
%
10
0
2
OV
E
R
T
I
M
E
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
$4
,
3
3
0
$
4
,
5
3
8
$
8
,
6
6
5
$
4
,
1
2
7
90
.
9
4
%
10
0
5
LO
N
G
E
V
I
T
Y
PA
Y
$5
4
2
$6
3
4
$
3
,
0
5
4
$
2
,
4
2
0
38
1
.
7
0
%
11
1
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
SH
A
R
E
F.
I
.
C
.
A
.
$1
3
,
4
8
4
$
1
5
,
0
0
8
$
1
6
,
0
9
3
$
1
,
0
8
5
7.
2
3
%
11
2
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
SH
A
R
E
T.
M
.
R
.
S
.
$1
5
,
7
7
8
$
1
2
,
4
5
5
$
1
0
,
2
6
3
(
$
2
,
1
9
2
)
‐17
.
6
0
%
11
3
0
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐EM
P
L
O
Y
E
E
LI
F
E
$7
3
4
$7
5
2
$7
9
3
$4
1
5.
4
5
%
11
3
1
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐WO
R
K
M
E
N
S
CO
M
P
$2
3
2
$2
5
5
$2
2
6
($
2
9
)
‐11
.
3
7
%
11
3
5
HE
A
L
T
H
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
$3
6
,
0
0
0
$
3
6
,
0
0
0
$
3
6
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
SA
L
A
R
I
E
S
& BE
N
E
F
I
T
S
$2
6
0
,
9
8
3
$
2
6
0
,
6
4
8
$
2
7
3
,
7
4
7
$
1
3
,
0
9
9
5.
0
3
%
21
0
0
OF
F
I
C
E
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$6
1
2
$
1
,
3
0
0
$
1
,
3
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
23
1
8
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$0
$1
,
4
0
0
$0
($
1
,
4
0
0
)
‐10
0
.
0
0
%
23
5
0
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
& MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
$3
6
2
$4
0
0
$4
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$9
7
4
$
3
,
1
0
0
$
1
,
7
0
0
(
$
1
,
4
0
0
)
‐45
.
1
6
%
30
1
0
PO
S
T
A
G
E
$3
,
1
8
8
$
2
,
1
1
8
$
4
,
4
0
0
$
2
,
2
8
2
10
7
.
7
4
%
30
6
0
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$2
2
,
0
5
3
$
2
5
,
7
9
0
$
2
5
,
7
9
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
30
6
3
PR
O
G
R
A
M
M
I
N
G
/
M
A
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$2
,
3
7
3
$
1
8
,
5
4
3
$
1
8
,
5
4
3
$0
0.
0
0
%
31
1
3
PR
I
N
T
I
N
G
$3
,
0
8
7
$
2
,
5
7
0
$
3
,
1
7
0
$6
0
0
23
.
3
5
%
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$3
0
,
7
0
1
$
4
9
,
0
2
1
$
5
1
,
9
0
3
$
2
,
8
8
2
5.
8
8
%
41
1
0
HE
A
T
,
L
I
G
H
T
,
W
A
T
E
R
UT
I
L
$3
,
2
2
6
$
3
,
5
2
0
$
3
,
0
0
0
(
$
5
2
0
)
‐14
.
7
7
%
41
2
0
TE
L
E
P
H
O
N
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
$4
,
0
9
8
$
4
,
6
5
6
$
4
,
4
0
1
(
$
2
5
5
)
‐5.
4
8
%
UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
$7
,
3
2
4
$
8
,
1
7
6
$
7
,
4
0
1
(
$
7
7
5
)
‐9.
4
8
%
55
0
6
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐GE
N
E
R
A
L
LI
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
$5
1
4
$1
8
5
$1
8
5
$0
0.
0
0
%
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
$5
1
4
$1
8
5
$1
8
5
$0
0.
0
0
%
62
0
0
EQ
U
I
P
RE
P
A
I
R
S
/
N
O
N
VE
H
I
C
L
E
$2
9
7
$5
0
0
$8
5
0
$3
5
0
70
.
0
0
%
OU
T
S
I
D
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$2
9
7
$5
0
0
$8
5
0
$3
5
0
70
.
0
0
%
71
5
0
DU
E
S
& SU
B
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
$0
$1
4
0
$1
4
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
71
7
0
TR
A
V
E
L
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$3
,
5
5
8
$
6
,
7
5
0
$
3
,
5
0
0
(
$
3
,
2
5
0
)
‐48
.
1
5
%
72
0
1
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
BE
L
O
W
$5
0
0
0
$4
,
2
8
2
$5
0
0
$5
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
01
-
1
0
C
O
U
R
T
11 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
01
‐10
CO
U
R
T
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
72
2
1
OT
H
E
R
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$1
0
4
$2
0
0
$2
8
0
$8
0
40
.
0
0
%
72
4
0
TU
I
T
I
O
N
& TR
A
I
N
I
N
G
$1
,
5
6
0
$
2
,
5
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
(
$
1
,
0
0
0
)
‐40
.
0
0
%
OT
H
E
R
$9
,
5
0
4
$
1
0
,
0
9
0
$
5
,
9
2
0
(
$
4
,
1
7
0
)
‐41
.
3
3
%
92
0
1
MI
C
R
O
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
$0
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
CA
P
I
T
A
L
EX
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
S
$0
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
TO
T
A
L
CO
U
R
T
$3
1
0
,
2
9
7
$
3
3
1
,
7
2
0
$
3
4
1
,
7
0
6
$
9
,
9
8
6
3.
0
1
%
01
-
1
0
C
O
U
R
T
12 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
01
‐11
GE
N
E
R
A
L
FU
N
D
RE
V
E
N
U
E
S
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
30
0
0
TA
X
E
S
‐CU
R
R
E
N
T
YE
A
R
$1
5
,
7
8
6
,
2
4
1
$1
5
,
5
0
4
,
3
4
2
$1
5
,
5
5
8
,
1
8
4
$5
3
,
8
4
2
0.
3
5
%
SU
B
T
O
T
A
L
CU
R
R
E
N
T
TA
X
E
S
$1
5
,
7
8
6
,
2
4
1
$1
5
,
5
0
4
,
3
4
2
$1
5
,
5
5
8
,
1
8
4
$5
3
,
8
4
2
0.
3
5
%
30
4
7
DE
L
I
N
Q
U
E
N
T
TA
X
E
S
‐19
9
7
$9
8
3
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
30
4
8
DE
L
I
N
Q
U
E
N
T
TA
X
E
S
‐19
9
8
$1
,
2
3
4
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
30
4
9
DE
L
I
N
Q
U
E
N
T
TA
X
E
S
‐19
9
9
$9
7
6
$5
0
0
$0
($
5
0
0
)
‐10
0
.
0
0
%
30
5
0
DE
L
I
N
Q
U
E
N
T
TA
X
E
S
‐20
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
$5
0
0
$5
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
30
5
1
DE
L
I
N
Q
U
E
N
T
TA
X
E
S
‐20
0
1
$1
,
0
2
1
$5
0
0
$5
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
30
5
2
DE
L
I
N
Q
U
E
N
T
TA
X
E
S
‐20
0
2
$1
,
1
0
8
$5
0
0
$5
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
30
5
3
DE
L
I
N
Q
U
E
N
T
TA
X
E
S
‐20
0
3
$1
,
1
6
0
$5
0
0
$5
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
30
5
4
DE
L
I
N
Q
U
E
N
T
TA
X
E
S
‐20
0
4
$1
,
0
5
5
$5
0
0
$5
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
30
5
5
DE
L
I
N
Q
U
E
N
T
TA
X
E
S
‐20
0
5
$1
,
8
3
4
$1
,
0
0
0
$5
0
0
($
5
0
0
)
‐50
.
0
0
%
30
5
6
DE
L
I
N
Q
U
E
N
T
TA
X
E
S
‐20
0
6
$4
,
2
9
1
$2
,
5
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
($
1
,
5
0
0
)
‐60
.
0
0
%
30
5
7
DE
L
I
N
Q
U
E
N
T
TA
X
E
S
‐20
0
7
$7
,
1
5
3
$2
,
5
0
0
$2
,
5
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
30
5
8
DE
L
I
N
Q
U
E
N
T
TA
X
E
S
‐20
0
8
$1
2
,
3
7
2
$5
,
0
0
0
$2
,
5
0
0
($
2
,
5
0
0
)
‐50
.
0
0
%
30
5
9
DE
L
I
N
Q
U
E
N
T
TA
X
E
S
‐20
0
9
$2
4
,
1
3
1
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
($
5
,
0
0
0
)
‐50
.
0
0
%
30
4
5
.
2
0
1
0
DE
L
I
N
Q
U
E
N
T
TA
X
E
S
‐20
1
0
$0
$7
5
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
($
6
5
,
0
0
0
)
‐86
.
6
7
%
30
4
5
.
2
0
1
1
DE
L
I
N
Q
U
E
N
T
TA
X
E
S
‐20
1
1
$0
$0
$7
5
,
0
0
0
$7
5
,
0
0
0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
30
9
3
DE
L
I
N
Q
U
E
N
T
TA
X
E
S
‐19
9
3
$4
0
2
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
30
9
4
DE
L
I
N
Q
U
E
N
T
TA
X
E
S
‐19
9
4
$0
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
30
9
5
DE
L
I
N
Q
U
E
N
T
TA
X
E
S
‐19
9
5
$0
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
30
9
6
DE
L
I
N
Q
U
E
N
T
TA
X
E
S
‐19
9
6
$1
1
5
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
SU
B
T
O
T
A
L
DE
L
I
N
Q
U
E
N
T
TA
X
E
S
$5
8
,
8
3
5
$9
9
,
0
0
0
$9
9
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
30
9
8
PE
N
A
L
T
Y
/
I
N
T
E
R
E
S
T
ON
TA
X
E
S
$9
7
,
6
5
5
$1
1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
1
0
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
30
9
9
AT
T
O
R
N
E
Y
FE
E
S
‐TA
X
E
S
$2
1
,
8
7
2
$3
5
,
0
0
0
$3
5
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
SU
B
T
O
T
A
L
PE
N
A
L
T
Y
AN
D
IN
T
E
R
E
S
T
$1
1
9
,
5
2
7
$1
4
5
,
0
0
0
$1
4
5
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
31
0
9
UT
I
L
I
T
Y
FU
N
D
CO
N
T
R
I
B
U
T
I
O
N
$6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
SU
B
T
O
T
A
L
UF
CO
N
T
R
I
B
U
T
I
O
N
$6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
31
5
0
CI
T
Y
SA
L
E
S
TA
X
$3
,
4
7
9
,
6
2
9
$3
,
1
7
8
,
8
5
1
$3
,
3
3
8
,
0
0
0
$1
5
9
,
1
4
9
5.
0
1
%
SU
B
T
O
T
A
L
SA
L
E
S
TA
X
$3
,
4
7
9
,
6
2
9
$3
,
1
7
8
,
8
5
1
$3
,
3
3
8
,
0
0
0
$1
5
9
,
1
4
9
5.
0
1
%
01
-
1
1
G
F
R
E
V
E
N
U
E
S
13 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
01
‐11
GE
N
E
R
A
L
FU
N
D
RE
V
E
N
U
E
S
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
33
0
0
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
PE
R
M
I
T
S
$2
,
8
4
6
,
1
2
5
$1
,
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
SU
B
T
O
T
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
PE
R
M
I
T
S
$2
,
8
4
6
,
1
2
5
$1
,
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
34
9
9
DI
R
E
C
T
AL
A
R
M
RE
V
E
N
U
E
$7
9
9
,
8
8
4
$8
1
9
,
0
0
0
$8
6
6
,
9
8
9
$4
7
,
9
8
9
5.
8
6
%
SU
B
T
O
T
A
L
DI
R
E
C
T
AL
A
R
M
$7
9
9
,
8
8
4
$8
1
9
,
0
0
0
$8
6
6
,
9
8
9
$4
7
,
9
8
9
5.
8
6
%
32
0
0
T U EL
E
C
T
R
I
C
$1
,
1
6
3
,
3
8
3
$1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
32
0
2
TE
L
E
P
H
O
N
E
FR
A
N
C
H
I
S
E
$2
1
1
,
0
3
1
$3
0
0
,
0
0
0
$3
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
32
0
3
LO
N
E
ST
A
R
GA
S
$4
6
9
,
9
1
6
$4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
32
0
4
CA
B
L
E
FR
A
N
C
H
I
S
E
$3
6
2
,
9
7
3
$2
1
0
,
0
0
0
$3
5
0
,
0
0
0
$1
4
0
,
0
0
0
66
.
6
7
%
SU
B
T
O
T
A
L
FR
A
N
C
H
I
S
E
FE
E
S
$2
,
2
0
7
,
3
0
3
$1
,
9
1
0
,
0
0
0
$2
,
0
5
0
,
0
0
0
$1
4
0
,
0
0
0
7.
3
3
%
34
0
0
TR
A
F
F
I
C
FI
N
E
S
$3
0
4
,
3
5
9
$3
4
6
,
0
0
0
$3
4
6
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
34
0
3
CR
O
S
S
'
G
GU
A
R
D
(
C
H
I
L
D
SF
T
Y
)
$1
6
,
2
2
7
$1
5
,
0
0
0
$1
5
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
34
0
4
PA
R
K
I
N
G
TI
C
K
E
T
S
$1
3
8
,
1
3
5
$1
7
0
,
0
0
0
$1
9
5
,
0
0
0
$2
5
,
0
0
0
14
.
7
1
%
SU
B
T
O
T
A
L
FI
N
E
S
$4
5
8
,
7
2
1
$5
3
1
,
0
0
0
$5
5
6
,
0
0
0
$2
5
,
0
0
0
4.
7
1
%
33
0
2
CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
O
R
S
LI
C
N
S
E
/
P
E
R
M
I
T
$2
4
,
7
3
5
$4
0
,
0
0
0
$4
0
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
33
0
3
AN
I
M
A
L
CO
N
T
R
O
L
TA
G
S
/
F
E
E
S
$1
6
,
1
7
3
$1
5
,
0
0
0
$1
5
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
33
0
4
HE
A
L
T
H
/
F
O
O
D
PE
R
M
I
T
$3
4
,
2
1
0
$2
0
,
0
0
0
$2
0
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
33
0
5
FI
L
M
I
N
G
PE
R
M
I
T
S
$2
,
2
8
2
$2
,
0
0
0
$2
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
33
0
6
FI
R
E
PE
R
M
I
T
S
/
R
E
V
E
N
U
E
$2
8
,
3
8
9
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
33
0
8
PO
L
I
C
E
RE
V
E
N
U
E
$8
7
,
0
9
8
$9
7
,
9
1
1
$4
4
,
9
1
1
($
5
3
,
0
0
0
)
‐54
.
1
3
%
34
0
1
WR
E
C
K
E
R
FE
E
S
$1
,
6
0
8
$2
,
1
6
0
$2
,
1
6
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
34
0
5
AL
A
R
M
BI
L
L
I
N
G
$7
7
,
6
8
0
$1
3
5
,
9
8
4
$1
3
5
,
9
8
4
$0
0.
0
0
%
34
0
6
FA
L
S
E
AL
A
R
M
FE
E
S
$8
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
34
0
8
AM
B
U
L
A
N
C
E
FE
E
S
$2
9
6
,
3
0
2
$4
4
4
,
6
7
5
$3
0
0
,
0
0
0
($
1
4
4
,
6
7
5
)
‐32
.
5
3
%
34
0
9
91
1
SE
R
V
I
C
E
FE
E
S
$8
8
,
3
2
2
$1
0
9
,
0
0
0
$1
0
9
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
34
1
0
91
1
SE
R
V
I
C
E
FE
E
S
‐WI
R
E
L
E
S
S
$1
1
6
,
6
2
8
$1
1
1
,
0
0
0
$1
1
1
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
34
1
1
CA
P
I
A
S
WA
R
R
A
N
T
RE
V
E
N
U
E
$1
,
6
0
8
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
34
1
2
RE
D
LI
G
H
T
CA
M
E
R
A
RE
V
E
N
U
E
$0
$0
$2
0
,
0
0
0
$2
0
,
0
0
0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
35
3
5
UT
I
L
I
T
Y
CA
P
OF
F
$1
4
,
9
0
0
$3
0
,
0
0
0
$3
0
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
SU
B
T
O
T
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
CH
A
R
G
E
S
$7
9
0
,
7
3
5
$1
,
0
4
2
,
7
3
0
$8
6
5
,
0
5
5
($
1
7
7
,
6
7
5
)
‐17
.
0
4
%
01
-
1
1
G
F
R
E
V
E
N
U
E
S
14 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
01
‐11
GE
N
E
R
A
L
FU
N
D
RE
V
E
N
U
E
S
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
39
0
0
IN
T
E
R
E
S
T
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
$2
0
2
,
1
2
0
$2
6
5
,
0
0
0
$2
6
5
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
SU
B
T
O
T
A
L
IN
T
E
R
E
S
T
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
$2
0
2
,
1
2
0
$2
6
5
,
0
0
0
$2
6
5
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
31
5
5
MI
X
E
D
BE
V
E
R
A
G
E
TA
X
$1
0
5
,
1
7
5
$1
0
8
,
0
0
0
$8
8
,
0
0
0
($
2
0
,
0
0
0
)
‐18
.
5
2
%
35
1
0
TE
N
N
I
S
PE
R
M
I
T
S
$5
0
,
0
4
8
$2
4
,
0
0
0
$2
4
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
35
1
1
SW
I
M
PO
O
L
PE
R
M
I
T
‐RE
S
I
D
E
N
T
$1
7
7
,
6
8
5
$1
6
5
,
0
0
0
$1
6
5
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
35
1
2
SW
I
M
PO
O
L
PE
R
M
I
T
‐NO
N
R
E
S
$9
,
7
8
0
$7
,
0
0
0
$7
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
35
1
3
SW
I
M
PO
O
L
PR
M
T
S
GA
T
E
RC
P
T
$1
1
7
,
3
9
0
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
35
1
4
SW
I
M
M
I
N
G
PO
O
L
CO
N
C
E
S
S
I
O
N
S
$8
,
0
0
0
$6
,
0
0
0
$6
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
35
1
5
SW
I
M
LE
S
S
O
N
S
$1
,
5
0
0
$2
,
0
0
0
$2
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
37
3
0
PU
B
L
I
C
SA
F
E
T
Y
GR
A
N
T
S
/
R
E
V
$0
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
37
4
0
PO
L
I
C
E
GR
A
N
T
S
/
D
O
N
A
T
I
O
N
S
$0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
37
4
5
FI
R
E
GR
A
N
T
S
/
D
O
N
A
T
I
O
N
S
$1
2
,
8
9
4
$5
,
0
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
38
5
0
AU
C
T
I
O
N
/
S
A
L
E
OF
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
$2
4
,
7
5
1
$2
1
,
0
0
0
$2
1
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
39
0
1
RE
N
T
$4
5
,
8
7
5
$4
0
,
0
0
0
$4
0
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
39
1
1
CO
P
I
E
S
$1
,
3
9
2
$4
,
0
0
0
$4
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
39
2
0
PA
Y
M
E
N
T
IN
LI
E
U
OF
TA
X
E
S
$3
7
5
,
0
0
0
$0
$3
0
0
,
0
0
0
$3
0
0
,
0
0
0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
39
9
9
OT
H
E
R
RE
V
E
N
U
E
$1
,
4
4
1
,
4
3
7
$7
7
1
,
0
7
7
$7
7
1
,
0
7
7
$0
0.
0
0
%
SU
B
T
O
T
A
L
OT
H
E
R
RE
V
E
N
U
E
$2
,
3
7
0
,
9
2
7
$1
,
2
6
3
,
0
7
7
$1
,
5
4
3
,
0
7
7
$2
8
0
,
0
0
0
22
.
1
7
%
TO
T
A
L
RE
V
E
N
U
E
S
‐
GE
N
E
R
A
L
FU
N
D
$2
9
,
7
2
0
,
0
4
7
$2
6
,
7
5
8
,
0
0
0
$2
7
,
2
8
6
,
3
0
5
$5
2
8
,
3
0
5
1.
9
7
%
01
-
1
1
G
F
R
E
V
E
N
U
E
S
15 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
01
‐19
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
10
0
1
RE
G
U
L
A
R
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
$7
0
2
,
8
8
2
$
7
1
0
,
6
2
9
$
7
9
9
,
0
7
4
$
8
8
,
4
4
5
12
.
4
5
%
10
0
2
OV
E
R
T
I
M
E
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
($
8
6
)
$5
2
7
$0
(
$
5
2
7
)
‐10
0
.
0
0
%
10
0
5
LO
N
G
E
V
I
T
Y
PA
Y
$4
,
4
9
9
$
4
,
8
5
9
$
4
,
8
3
9
($
2
0
)
‐0.
4
1
%
10
0
7
CA
R
AL
L
O
W
A
N
C
E
$7
,
2
0
0
$
7
,
2
0
0
$
7
,
2
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
10
0
9
CE
L
L
PH
O
N
E
AL
L
O
W
A
N
C
E
$3
6
0
$3
6
0
$9
6
0
$6
0
0
16
6
.
6
7
%
11
1
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
SH
A
R
E
F.
I
.
C
.
A
.
$5
3
,
2
8
4
$
5
4
,
4
2
3
$
6
1
,
0
0
6
$
6
,
5
8
3
12
.
1
0
%
11
2
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
SH
A
R
E
T.
M
.
R
.
S
.
$9
8
,
4
9
5
$
7
5
,
9
7
6
$
6
5
,
0
7
6
(
$
1
0
,
9
0
0
)
‐14
.
3
5
%
11
3
0
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐EM
P
L
O
Y
E
E
LI
F
E
$4
,
4
9
0
$
4
,
7
0
9
$
4
,
9
2
8
$2
1
9
4.
6
5
%
11
3
1
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐WO
R
K
M
E
N
S
CO
M
P
$1
,
4
1
6
$
1
,
4
4
9
$
1
,
3
9
4
($
5
5
)
‐3.
8
0
%
11
3
5
HE
A
L
T
H
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
$8
1
,
0
0
0
$7
2
,
0
0
0
$9
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
8
,
0
0
0
25
.
0
0
%
SA
L
A
R
I
E
S
& BE
N
E
F
I
T
S
$9
5
3
,
5
4
0
$
9
3
2
,
1
3
2
$
1
,
0
3
4
,
4
7
7
$
1
0
2
,
3
4
5
10
.
9
8
%
20
2
9
CL
O
T
H
I
N
G
AL
L
O
W
A
N
C
E
$1
,
1
8
7
$
1
,
3
2
0
$
1
,
5
0
5
$1
8
5
14
.
0
2
%
21
0
0
OF
F
I
C
E
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$2
,
7
4
9
$
4
,
0
0
0
$
4
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
23
1
8
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$0
$
1
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
23
2
0
GA
S
,
OI
L
& GR
E
A
S
E
$4
,
0
8
1
$
4
,
9
9
2
$
4
,
9
9
2
$0
0.
0
0
%
23
5
0
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
& MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
$1
,
2
3
7
$
1
,
5
0
0
$
2
,
2
5
0
$7
5
0
50
.
0
0
%
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$9
,
2
5
4
$
1
2
,
8
1
2
$
1
3
,
7
4
7
$9
3
5
7.
3
0
%
30
0
3
BO
A
R
D
ME
E
T
I
N
G
S
$1
,
0
3
4
$
1
,
5
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
30
1
0
PO
S
T
A
G
E
$1
,
3
8
3
$
1
,
3
3
4
$
4
,
8
0
0
$
3
,
4
6
6
25
9
.
8
2
%
30
1
4
PU
B
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
$3
9
7
$5
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
20
0
.
0
0
%
30
6
0
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$1
,
0
5
4
$
1
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
30
6
3
PR
O
G
R
A
M
M
I
N
G
/
M
A
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$1
8
,
9
8
6
$
1
2
,
9
8
7
$
3
4
,
0
3
2
$
2
1
,
0
4
5
16
2
.
0
5
%
31
1
3
PR
I
N
T
I
N
G
$4
0
0
$5
0
0
$5
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$2
3
,
2
5
4
$
1
7
,
8
2
1
$
4
3
,
3
3
2
$
2
5
,
5
1
1
14
3
.
1
5
%
41
1
0
HE
A
T
,
L
I
G
H
T
,
W
A
T
E
R
UT
I
L
$4
,
9
2
7
$
5
,
3
1
2
$
4
,
8
0
0
(
$
5
1
2
)
‐9.
6
4
%
41
2
0
TE
L
E
P
H
O
N
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
$9
,
8
1
8
$
7
,
1
2
2
$
1
0
,
8
4
7
$
3
,
7
2
5
52
.
3
0
%
UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
$1
4
,
7
4
5
$
1
2
,
4
3
4
$
1
5
,
6
4
7
$
3
,
2
1
3
25
.
8
4
%
55
0
0
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐AU
T
O
LI
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
$1
3
2
$1
2
2
$1
2
2
$0
0.
0
0
%
55
0
6
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐GE
N
E
R
A
L
LI
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
$8
7
1
$3
1
4
$3
1
4
$0
0.
0
0
%
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
$1
,
0
0
3
$4
3
6
$4
3
6
$0
0.
0
0
%
01
-
1
9
C
O
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
16 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
01
‐19
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
61
9
0
AU
T
O
RE
P
A
I
R
S
$1
,
0
3
7
$
2
,
0
6
0
$
2
,
0
6
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
61
9
5
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$6
,
7
1
9
$
1
5
,
8
9
9
$
1
5
,
8
9
9
$0
0.
0
0
%
62
0
0
EQ
U
I
P
RE
P
A
I
R
S
/
N
O
N
VE
H
I
C
L
E
$0
$3
0
0
$3
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
OU
T
S
I
D
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$7
,
7
5
6
$
1
8
,
2
5
9
$
1
8
,
2
5
9
$0
0.
0
0
%
71
5
0
DU
E
S
& SU
B
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
$3
,
5
0
3
$
3
,
0
9
5
$
2
,
6
6
5
(
$
4
3
0
)
‐13
.
8
9
%
71
7
0
TR
A
V
E
L
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$1
,
2
1
0
$
4
,
9
8
5
$
4
,
9
1
0
($
7
5
)
‐1.
5
0
%
72
0
1
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
BE
L
O
W
$5
0
0
0
$1
3
4
$
2
,
2
2
7
$
5
,
5
0
0
$
3
,
2
7
3
14
6
.
9
7
%
72
0
2
MI
C
R
O
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
SO
F
T
W
A
R
E
$0
$
1
,
5
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
72
2
1
OT
H
E
R
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$2
,
8
3
8
$
3
,
5
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
28
.
5
7
%
72
4
0
TU
I
T
I
O
N
& TR
A
I
N
I
N
G
$2
,
9
6
6
$
5
,
5
3
1
$
6
,
4
1
3
$8
8
2
15
.
9
5
%
72
4
5
TU
I
T
I
O
N
RE
I
M
B
U
R
S
E
M
E
N
T
$9
4
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
OT
H
E
R
$1
0
,
7
4
5
$
2
0
,
8
3
8
$
2
5
,
4
8
8
$
4
,
6
5
0
22
.
3
2
%
90
0
0
CA
P
I
T
A
L
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
RE
P
L
A
C
E
$2
,
9
8
1
$
2
,
1
6
7
$
4
,
2
0
9
$
2
,
0
4
2
94
.
2
3
%
CA
P
I
T
A
L
EX
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
S
$2
,
9
8
1
$
2
,
1
6
7
$
4
,
2
0
9
$
2
,
0
4
2
94
.
2
3
%
TO
T
A
L
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
$1
,
0
2
3
,
2
7
8
$
1
,
0
1
6
,
8
9
9
$
1
,
1
5
5
,
5
9
5
$
1
3
8
,
6
9
6
13
.
6
4
%
01
-
1
9
C
O
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
17 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
01
‐20
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
10
0
1
RE
G
U
L
A
R
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
$4
9
6
,
9
4
3
$
4
9
5
,
2
7
6
$
5
1
2
,
0
5
7
$
1
6
,
7
8
1
3.
3
9
%
10
0
2
OV
E
R
T
I
M
E
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
($
1
,
4
1
8
)
$
2
,
1
4
6
$
1
,
6
9
8
(
$
4
4
8
)
‐20
.
8
8
%
10
0
5
LO
N
G
E
V
I
T
Y
PA
Y
$4
,
4
6
5
$
4
,
6
8
3
$
4
,
9
1
9
$2
3
6
5.
0
4
%
10
0
7
CA
R
AL
L
O
W
A
N
C
E
$1
4
,
4
0
0
$
1
4
,
4
0
0
$
1
4
,
4
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
10
0
9
CE
L
L
PH
O
N
E
AL
L
O
W
A
N
C
E
$0
$0
$3
6
0
$3
6
0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
11
1
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
SH
A
R
E
F.
I
.
C
.
A
.
$3
3
,
9
6
2
$
3
4
,
3
6
2
$
3
5
,
4
6
3
$
1
,
1
0
1
3.
2
0
%
11
2
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
SH
A
R
E
T.
M
.
R
.
S
.
$7
1
,
7
3
1
$
5
4
,
2
3
3
$
4
4
,
0
6
2
(
$
1
0
,
1
7
1
)
‐18
.
7
5
%
11
3
0
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐EM
P
L
O
Y
E
E
LI
F
E
$3
,
3
6
1
$
3
,
8
4
7
$
3
,
4
1
6
(
$
4
3
1
)
‐11
.
2
0
%
11
3
1
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐WO
R
K
M
E
N
S
CO
M
P
$1
,
1
8
1
$9
4
5
$7
9
1
(
$
1
5
4
)
‐16
.
3
0
%
11
3
5
HE
A
L
T
H
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
$4
5
,
0
0
0
$4
5
,
0
0
0
$4
5
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
SA
L
A
R
I
E
S
& BE
N
E
F
I
T
S
$6
6
9
,
6
2
5
$
6
5
4
,
8
9
2
$
6
6
2
,
1
6
6
$
7
,
2
7
4
1.
1
1
%
20
2
9
CL
O
T
H
I
N
G
AL
L
O
W
A
N
C
E
$1
,
5
4
4
$
1
,
3
5
0
$
1
,
3
5
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
21
0
0
OF
F
I
C
E
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$1
,
2
4
7
$
1
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
23
1
8
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$1
,
5
0
1
$
3
,
5
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
(
$
2
,
0
0
0
)
‐57
.
1
4
%
23
2
0
GA
S
,
OI
L
& GR
E
A
S
E
$2
,
7
7
9
$
3
,
4
7
4
$
3
,
4
7
4
$0
0.
0
0
%
23
5
0
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
& MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
$2
,
7
5
0
$
2
,
5
0
0
$
2
,
5
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$9
,
8
2
1
$
1
1
,
8
2
4
$
9
,
8
2
4
(
$
2
,
0
0
0
)
‐16
.
9
1
%
30
1
0
PO
S
T
A
G
E
$6
7
$9
7
$9
7
$0
0.
0
0
%
30
6
0
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$2
4
,
4
1
2
$
1
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
5
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
30
6
3
PR
O
G
R
A
M
M
I
N
G
/
M
A
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$1
9
,
6
4
3
$
1
9
,
7
7
6
$
2
0
,
9
5
0
$
1
,
1
7
4
5.
9
4
%
31
1
3
PR
I
N
T
I
N
G
$3
3
$
1
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$4
4
,
1
5
5
$
3
5
,
8
7
3
$
3
7
,
0
4
7
$
1
,
1
7
4
3.
2
7
%
41
1
0
HE
A
T
,
L
I
G
H
T
,
W
A
T
E
R
UT
I
L
$4
,
3
8
1
$
4
,
8
3
5
$
4
,
3
0
0
(
$
5
3
5
)
‐11
.
0
7
%
41
2
0
TE
L
E
P
H
O
N
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
$1
1
,
6
4
2
$
1
3
,
1
0
5
$
1
0
,
8
3
4
(
$
2
,
2
7
1
)
‐17
.
3
3
%
UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
$1
6
,
0
2
3
$
1
7
,
9
4
0
$
1
5
,
1
3
4
(
$
2
,
8
0
6
)
‐15
.
6
4
%
55
0
0
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐AU
T
O
LI
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
$2
9
8
$2
7
5
$2
7
5
$0
0.
0
0
%
55
0
6
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐GE
N
E
R
A
L
LI
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
$1
,
0
9
1
$3
9
3
$3
9
3
$0
0.
0
0
%
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
$1
,
3
8
9
$6
6
8
$6
6
8
$0
0.
0
0
%
61
9
0
AU
T
O
RE
P
A
I
R
S
$1
,
6
9
3
$
1
,
9
6
8
$
1
,
9
6
8
$0
0.
0
0
%
01
-
2
0
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
18 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
01
‐20
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
61
9
5
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$7
,
0
3
3
$
8
,
3
8
4
$
8
,
3
8
4
$0
0.
0
0
%
62
0
0
EQ
U
I
P
RE
P
A
I
R
S
/
N
O
N
VE
H
I
C
L
E
$5
6
7
$
1
,
5
0
0
$5
0
0
(
$
1
,
0
0
0
)
‐66
.
6
7
%
OU
T
S
I
D
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$9
,
2
9
3
$
1
1
,
8
5
2
$
1
0
,
8
5
2
(
$
1
,
0
0
0
)
‐8.
4
4
%
71
5
0
DU
E
S
& SU
B
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
$1
,
2
2
8
$9
9
0
$9
9
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
71
7
0
TR
A
V
E
L
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$1
,
2
5
2
$
1
,
7
8
0
$
1
,
7
8
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
72
0
1
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
BE
L
O
W
$5
0
0
0
$2
,
7
4
0
$5
0
0
$
6
,
3
0
0
$
5
,
8
0
0
11
6
0
.
0
0
%
72
0
2
MI
C
R
O
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
SO
F
T
W
A
R
E
$1
7
,
1
3
9
$5
0
0
$5
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
72
4
0
TU
I
T
I
O
N
& TR
A
I
N
I
N
G
$9
4
4
$
3
,
7
1
0
$
1
,
7
1
0
(
$
2
,
0
0
0
)
‐53
.
9
1
%
OT
H
E
R
$2
3
,
3
0
3
$
7
,
4
8
0
$
1
1
,
2
8
0
$
3
,
8
0
0
50
.
8
0
%
90
0
0
CA
P
I
T
A
L
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
RE
P
L
A
C
E
$4
,
3
2
9
$
3
,
6
8
3
$
3
,
5
3
4
(
$
1
4
9
)
‐4.
0
5
%
CA
P
I
T
A
L
EX
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
S
$4
,
3
2
9
$
3
,
6
8
3
$
3
,
5
3
4
(
$
1
4
9
)
‐4.
0
5
%
TO
T
A
L
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
$7
7
7
,
9
3
8
$
7
4
4
,
2
1
2
$
7
5
0
,
5
0
5
$
6
,
2
9
3
0.
8
5
%
01
-
2
0
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
19 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
01
‐25
TR
A
F
F
I
C
CO
N
T
R
O
L
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
10
0
1
RE
G
U
L
A
R
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
$3
7
6
,
7
6
5
$
3
8
6
,
2
1
3
$
4
0
1
,
8
1
0
$
1
5
,
5
9
7
4.
0
4
%
10
0
2
OV
E
R
T
I
M
E
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
$2
,
6
9
7
$
3
,
2
8
6
$
3
,
7
5
7
$4
7
1
14
.
3
3
%
10
0
5
LO
N
G
E
V
I
T
Y
PA
Y
$4
,
0
1
1
$
4
,
1
5
2
$
4
,
4
8
8
$3
3
6
8.
0
9
%
11
1
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
SH
A
R
E
F.
I
.
C
.
A
.
$2
8
,
3
2
9
$
3
0
,
1
1
5
$
3
1
,
3
6
8
$
1
,
2
5
3
4.
1
6
%
11
2
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
SH
A
R
E
T.
M
.
R
.
S
.
$5
3
,
0
9
4
$
4
1
,
3
3
4
$
3
3
,
8
7
2
(
$
7
,
4
6
2
)
‐18
.
0
5
%
11
3
0
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐EM
P
L
O
Y
E
E
LI
F
E
$2
,
2
2
4
$
2
,
5
6
2
$
2
,
6
8
1
$1
1
9
4.
6
4
%
11
3
1
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐WO
R
K
M
E
N
S
CO
M
P
$6
,
3
8
5
$
7
,
0
1
2
$
5
,
7
8
0
(
$
1
,
2
3
2
)
‐17
.
5
7
%
11
3
5
HE
A
L
T
H
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
$6
3
,
0
0
0
$
6
3
,
0
0
0
$
6
3
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
SA
L
A
R
I
E
S
& BE
N
E
F
I
T
S
$5
3
6
,
5
0
5
$
5
3
7
,
6
7
4
$
5
4
6
,
7
5
6
$
9
,
0
8
2
1.
6
9
%
20
2
9
CL
O
T
H
I
N
G
AL
L
O
W
A
N
C
E
$3
,
2
0
6
$
3
,
4
2
0
$
3
,
4
2
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
21
0
0
OF
F
I
C
E
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$4
2
7
$1
,
0
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
23
2
0
GA
S
,
OI
L
& GR
E
A
S
E
$8
,
3
9
0
$
7
,
7
8
5
$
7
,
7
8
5
$0
0.
0
0
%
23
5
0
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
& MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
$5
7
,
8
9
5
$
9
4
,
9
0
0
$
9
3
,
3
2
0
(
$
1
,
5
8
0
)
‐1.
6
6
%
23
6
0
SM
A
L
L
TO
O
L
S
$0
$2
5
0
$2
5
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$6
9
,
9
1
8
$
1
0
7
,
3
5
5
$
1
0
5
,
7
7
5
(
$
1
,
5
8
0
)
‐1.
4
7
%
30
1
0
PO
S
T
A
G
E
$1
$8
$5
($
3
)
‐37
.
5
0
%
30
6
0
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$2
0
,
3
4
0
$
2
4
,
0
0
0
$
2
2
,
0
0
0
(
$
2
,
0
0
0
)
‐8.
3
3
%
31
1
3
PR
I
N
T
I
N
G
$0
$
2
,
0
3
5
$
2
,
0
3
5
$0
0.
0
0
%
31
1
5
CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$5
,
4
1
8
$
8
,
1
8
2
$
6
,
2
2
3
(
$
1
,
9
5
9
)
‐23
.
9
4
%
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$2
5
,
7
5
9
$
3
4
,
2
2
5
$
3
0
,
2
6
3
(
$
3
,
9
6
2
)
‐11
.
5
8
%
41
1
0
HE
A
T
,
L
I
G
H
T
,
W
A
T
E
R
UT
I
L
$3
7
,
8
4
5
$
4
1
,
4
6
9
$
5
2
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
5
3
1
25
.
3
9
%
41
2
0
TE
L
E
P
H
O
N
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
$3
,
0
0
5
$
3
,
0
6
4
$
3
,
1
3
6
$7
2
2.
3
5
%
UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
$4
0
,
8
5
0
$
4
4
,
5
3
3
$
5
5
,
1
3
6
$
1
0
,
6
0
3
23
.
8
1
%
55
0
0
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐AU
T
O
LI
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
$1
,
4
9
3
$
1
,
3
7
8
$
1
,
3
7
8
$0
0.
0
0
%
55
0
6
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐GE
N
E
R
A
L
LI
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
$9
6
3
$3
4
7
$3
4
7
$0
0.
0
0
%
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
$2
,
4
5
6
$
1
,
7
2
5
$
1
,
7
2
5
$0
0.
0
0
%
61
9
0
AU
T
O
RE
P
A
I
R
S
$7
,
1
2
5
$
5
,
0
8
4
$
5
,
0
8
4
$0
0.
0
0
%
61
9
5
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$3
4
,
6
4
1
$
2
8
,
4
1
3
$
2
8
,
4
1
3
$0
0.
0
0
%
63
5
0
SI
G
N
A
L
MA
I
N
T
.
&
RE
P
$7
1
,
8
5
0
$
6
7
,
0
0
0
$
6
7
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
01
-
2
5
T
R
A
F
F
I
C
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
20 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
01
‐25
TR
A
F
F
I
C
CO
N
T
R
O
L
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
OU
T
S
I
D
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$1
1
3
,
6
1
6
$
1
0
0
,
4
9
7
$
1
0
0
,
4
9
7
$0
0.
0
0
%
71
5
0
DU
E
S
& SU
B
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
$4
8
0
$4
8
0
$5
6
0
$8
0
16
.
6
7
%
72
0
1
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
BE
L
O
W
$5
0
0
0
$0
$
1
,
3
6
5
$
4
,
3
0
0
$
2
,
9
3
5
21
5
.
0
2
%
72
0
2
MI
C
R
O
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
SO
F
T
W
A
R
E
$0
$5
0
0
$5
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
72
2
1
OT
H
E
R
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$2
,
3
8
5
$3
0
0
$3
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
72
4
0
TU
I
T
I
O
N
& TR
A
I
N
I
N
G
$2
,
3
2
5
$5
0
0
$0
(
$
5
0
0
)
‐10
0
.
0
0
%
OT
H
E
R
$5
,
1
9
0
$
3
,
1
4
5
$
5
,
6
6
0
$
2
,
5
1
5
79
.
9
7
%
90
0
0
CA
P
I
T
A
L
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
RE
P
L
A
C
E
$1
5
,
9
0
6
$
1
9
,
7
8
0
$
1
6
,
5
1
0
(
$
3
,
2
7
0
)
‐16
.
5
3
%
CA
P
I
T
A
L
EX
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
S
$1
5
,
9
0
6
$
1
9
,
7
8
0
$
1
6
,
5
1
0
(
$
3
,
2
7
0
)
‐16
.
5
3
%
TO
T
A
L
TR
A
F
F
I
C
$8
1
0
,
2
0
0
$
8
4
8
,
9
3
4
$
8
6
2
,
3
2
2
$
1
3
,
3
8
8
1.
5
8
%
01
-
2
5
T
R
A
F
F
I
C
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
21 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
01
‐35
FA
C
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
10
0
1
RE
G
U
L
A
R
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
$1
9
8
,
2
5
9
$
1
9
8
,
8
6
4
$
1
0
9
,
0
2
8
(
$
8
9
,
8
3
6
)
‐45
.
1
7
%
10
0
5
LO
N
G
E
V
I
T
Y
PA
Y
$2
,
3
1
1
$
2
,
4
1
5
$
1
,
2
9
8
(
$
1
,
1
1
7
)
‐46
.
2
5
%
10
0
7
CA
R
AL
L
O
W
A
N
C
E
$7
,
2
0
0
$
7
,
2
0
0
$0
(
$
7
,
2
0
0
)
‐10
0
.
0
0
%
11
1
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
SH
A
R
E
F.
I
.
C
.
A
.
$1
5
,
5
0
1
$
1
5
,
9
4
8
$
8
,
4
4
0
(
$
7
,
5
0
8
)
‐47
.
0
8
%
11
2
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
SH
A
R
E
T.
M
.
R
.
S
.
$2
8
,
7
4
7
$
2
1
,
8
9
0
$
9
,
1
1
3
(
$
1
2
,
7
7
7
)
‐58
.
3
7
%
11
3
0
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐EM
P
L
O
Y
E
E
LI
F
E
$1
,
6
6
9
$
1
,
3
1
7
$7
2
7
(
$
5
9
0
)
‐44
.
8
0
%
11
3
1
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐WO
R
K
M
E
N
S
CO
M
P
$1
,
0
1
3
$
1
,
0
3
0
$7
3
3
(
$
2
9
7
)
‐28
.
8
3
%
11
3
5
HE
A
L
T
H
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
$2
7
,
0
0
0
$
2
7
,
0
0
0
$
1
8
,
0
0
0
(
$
9
,
0
0
0
)
‐33
.
3
3
%
SA
L
A
R
I
E
S
& BE
N
E
F
I
T
S
$2
8
1
,
7
0
0
$
2
7
5
,
6
6
4
$
1
4
7
,
3
3
9
(
$
1
2
8
,
3
2
5
)
‐46
.
5
5
%
20
2
9
CL
O
T
H
I
N
G
AL
L
O
W
A
N
C
E
$3
6
6
$6
7
0
$6
7
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
21
0
0
OF
F
I
C
E
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$3
9
0
$4
8
2
$3
9
0
($
9
2
)
‐19
.
0
9
%
23
1
8
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$0
$2
6
1
$2
2
5
($
3
6
)
‐13
.
7
9
%
23
2
0
GA
S
,
OI
L
& GR
E
A
S
E
$2
,
8
5
6
$
8
,
4
2
7
$
3
,
4
2
7
(
$
5
,
0
0
0
)
‐59
.
3
3
%
23
5
0
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
& MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
$5
,
1
4
5
$
7
,
1
8
8
$
4
,
6
5
1
(
$
2
,
5
3
7
)
‐35
.
2
9
%
23
6
0
SM
A
L
L
TO
O
L
S
$0
$
1
,
0
9
8
$
1
,
0
9
8
$0
0.
0
0
%
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$8
,
7
5
7
$
1
8
,
1
2
6
$
1
0
,
4
6
1
(
$
7
,
6
6
5
)
‐42
.
2
9
%
30
1
0
PO
S
T
A
G
E
$1
$3
0
$5
($
2
5
)
‐83
.
3
3
%
30
1
4
PU
B
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
$0
$3
7
8
$3
7
8
$0
0.
0
0
%
30
6
0
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
0
0
0
$0
(
$
2
,
0
0
0
)
‐10
0
.
0
0
%
31
1
3
PR
I
N
T
I
N
G
$0
$2
0
0
$0
(
$
2
0
0
)
‐10
0
.
0
0
%
31
1
5
CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$7
5
,
5
9
9
$
1
6
1
,
0
0
4
$
1
3
7
,
6
4
2
(
$
2
3
,
3
6
2
)
‐14
.
5
1
%
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$8
5
,
6
0
0
$
1
6
3
,
6
1
2
$
1
3
8
,
0
2
5
(
$
2
5
,
5
8
7
)
‐15
.
6
4
%
41
1
0
HE
A
T
,
L
I
G
H
T
,
W
A
T
E
R
UT
I
L
$1
1
8
,
9
0
0
$
1
2
8
,
7
5
6
$
1
2
0
,
0
0
0
(
$
8
,
7
5
6
)
‐6.
8
0
%
41
2
0
TE
L
E
P
H
O
N
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
$3
,
9
7
3
$
4
,
3
2
6
$
4
,
1
5
9
(
$
1
6
7
)
‐3.
8
6
%
UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
$1
2
2
,
8
7
3
$
1
3
3
,
0
8
2
$
1
2
4
,
1
5
9
(
$
8
,
9
2
3
)
‐6.
7
0
%
55
0
0
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐AU
T
O
LI
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
$1
,
8
8
7
$
1
,
7
4
2
$
1
,
7
4
2
$0
0.
0
0
%
55
0
6
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐GE
N
E
R
A
L
LI
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
$1
,
0
8
5
$3
9
1
$3
9
1
$0
0.
0
0
%
55
1
0
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐BL
D
G
& CO
N
T
E
N
T
S
$2
6
,
6
7
2
$
4
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
0
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
$2
9
,
6
4
4
$
4
2
,
1
3
3
$
4
2
,
1
3
3
$0
0.
0
0
%
01
-
3
5
F
A
C
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
M
A
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
22 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
01
‐35
FA
C
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
61
8
4
SE
C
U
R
I
T
Y
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$3
,
0
9
0
$
1
4
,
0
8
3
$
1
2
,
0
8
3
(
$
2
,
0
0
0
)
‐14
.
2
0
%
61
9
0
AU
T
O
RE
P
A
I
R
S
$8
9
0
$
2
,
1
1
0
$
2
,
1
1
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
61
9
5
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$3
3
,
7
3
4
$
1
7
,
3
1
5
$
1
7
,
3
1
5
$0
0.
0
0
%
62
0
0
EQ
U
I
P
RE
P
A
I
R
S
/
N
O
N
VE
H
I
C
L
E
$1
,
9
7
3
$
1
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
4
0
0
$4
0
0
40
.
0
0
%
62
5
0
FA
C
I
L
I
T
Y
MA
I
N
T
& RE
P
$6
3
,
7
2
1
$
5
0
,
0
4
9
$
6
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
4
,
9
5
1
29
.
8
7
%
63
3
0
RA
D
I
O
SE
R
V
I
C
E
$0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$0
(
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
)
‐10
0
.
0
0
%
OU
T
S
I
D
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$1
0
3
,
4
0
8
$
9
4
,
5
5
7
$
9
7
,
9
0
8
$
3
,
3
5
1
3.
5
4
%
71
5
0
DU
E
S
& SU
B
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
$0
$1
2
0
$1
2
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
71
7
0
TR
A
V
E
L
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$1
4
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
72
0
1
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
BE
L
O
W
$5
0
0
0
$0
$
5
,
1
8
3
$5
0
0
(
$
4
,
6
8
3
)
‐90
.
3
5
%
72
0
2
MI
C
R
O
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
SO
F
T
W
A
R
E
$0
$5
0
0
$5
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
72
2
1
OT
H
E
R
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$0
$2
5
0
$2
5
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
72
4
0
TU
I
T
I
O
N
& TR
A
I
N
I
N
G
$2
1
9
$3
2
5
$3
2
5
$0
0.
0
0
%
72
6
0
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
RE
N
T
A
L
$0
$
1
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
74
7
5
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
‐‐
UN
D
E
R
$5
0
0
0
$3
,
3
8
6
$
5
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
OT
H
E
R
$3
,
6
1
9
$
1
2
,
3
7
8
$
7
,
6
9
5
(
$
4
,
6
8
3
)
‐37
.
8
3
%
90
0
0
CA
P
I
T
A
L
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
RE
P
L
A
C
E
$1
3
,
6
7
7
$
1
5
,
2
0
1
$
1
3
,
5
1
2
(
$
1
,
6
8
9
)
‐11
.
1
1
%
91
1
5
SM
A
L
L
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
$0
$5
4
0
$0
(
$
5
4
0
)
‐10
0
.
0
0
%
99
5
0
RE
M
O
D
E
L
I
N
G
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
$9
9
,
4
2
2
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
CA
P
I
T
A
L
EX
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
S
$1
1
3
,
0
9
9
$
1
5
,
7
4
1
$
1
3
,
5
1
2
(
$
2
,
2
2
9
)
‐14
.
1
6
%
TO
T
A
L
FA
C
I
L
I
T
Y
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$7
4
8
,
7
0
0
$
7
5
5
,
2
9
3
$
5
8
1
,
2
3
2
(
$
1
7
4
,
0
6
1
)
‐23
.
0
5
%
01
-
3
5
F
A
C
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
M
A
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
23 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
01
‐40
FI
R
E
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
10
0
1
RE
G
U
L
A
R
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
$2
,
7
8
9
,
2
6
9
$
2
,
7
1
1
,
2
2
3
$
2
,
8
1
1
,
9
7
5
$
1
0
0
,
7
5
2
3.
7
2
%
10
0
2
OV
E
R
T
I
M
E
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
$3
4
1
,
5
5
3
$
3
4
3
,
8
2
6
$
3
5
2
,
8
0
0
$
8
,
9
7
4
2.
6
1
%
10
0
5
LO
N
G
E
V
I
T
Y
PA
Y
$1
9
,
5
9
0
$
2
1
,
0
2
9
$
1
9
,
2
2
9
(
$
1
,
8
0
0
)
‐8.
5
6
%
10
0
6
ED
U
C
A
T
I
O
N
PA
Y
$3
9
,
9
9
8
$
4
0
,
5
6
0
$
4
8
,
3
6
0
$
7
,
8
0
0
19
.
2
3
%
10
0
7
CA
R
AL
L
O
W
A
N
C
E
$7
,
2
0
0
$
7
,
2
0
0
$
7
,
2
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
11
1
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
SH
A
R
E
F.
I
.
C
.
A
.
$2
3
2
,
5
3
4
$
2
3
5
,
5
2
5
$
2
2
9
,
2
0
4
(
$
6
,
3
2
1
)
‐2.
6
8
%
11
2
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
SH
A
R
E
T.
M
.
R
.
S
.
$2
0
,
0
0
3
$
1
5
,
0
9
5
$
1
2
,
2
7
5
(
$
2
,
8
2
0
)
‐18
.
6
8
%
11
2
1
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
SH
A
R
E
F.
R
.
&
R
.
$4
6
9
,
2
6
6
$
4
6
3
,
1
0
7
$
4
7
6
,
2
8
2
$
1
3
,
1
7
5
2.
8
4
%
11
3
0
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐EM
P
L
O
Y
E
E
LI
F
E
$1
7
,
9
9
1
$
1
7
,
2
4
6
$
1
7
,
2
5
1
$5
0.
0
3
%
11
3
1
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐WO
R
K
M
E
N
S
CO
M
P
$2
3
,
2
9
0
$2
7
,
8
6
6
$2
3
,
0
1
9
(
$
4
,
8
4
7
)
‐17
.
3
9
%
11
3
5
HE
A
L
T
H
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
$3
3
3
,
7
5
0
$
3
0
6
,
0
0
0
$
3
1
5
,
0
0
0
$
9
,
0
0
0
2.
9
4
%
SA
L
A
R
I
E
S
& BE
N
E
F
I
T
S
$4
,
2
9
4
,
4
4
4
$
4
,
1
8
8
,
6
7
7
$
4
,
3
1
2
,
5
9
5
$
1
2
3
,
9
1
8
2.
9
6
%
20
2
9
CL
O
T
H
I
N
G
AL
L
O
W
A
N
C
E
$1
9
,
3
6
5
$
3
5
,
4
0
0
$
2
3
,
8
0
0
(
$
1
1
,
6
0
0
)
‐32
.
7
7
%
20
6
0
PR
O
T
E
C
T
I
V
E
CL
O
T
H
G
& SU
P
P
$6
,
3
3
1
$
4
,
1
0
0
$
4
2
,
8
0
0
$
3
8
,
7
0
0
94
3
.
9
0
%
21
0
0
OF
F
I
C
E
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$3
,
3
5
4
$
4
,
0
0
0
$
4
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
23
1
8
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$0
$5
0
0
$5
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
23
2
0
GA
S
,
OI
L
& GR
E
A
S
E
$1
9
,
0
9
7
$
2
1
,
5
7
4
$
2
1
,
5
7
4
$0
0.
0
0
%
23
4
5
MI
C
U
DR
U
G
S
& SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$3
8
,
0
4
0
$
3
0
,
9
0
0
$
4
1
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
1
0
0
32
.
6
9
%
23
5
0
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
& MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
$1
6
,
3
2
8
$
1
4
,
0
0
0
$
1
6
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
0
0
0
14
.
2
9
%
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$1
0
2
,
5
1
5
$
1
1
0
,
4
7
4
$
1
4
9
,
6
7
4
$
3
9
,
2
0
0
35
.
4
8
%
30
1
0
PO
S
T
A
G
E
$2
6
1
$5
0
0
$5
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
30
6
0
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$3
8
,
8
0
0
$
1
0
3
,
1
0
0
$
6
9
,
4
0
0
(
$
3
3
,
7
0
0
)
‐32
.
6
9
%
30
6
3
PR
O
G
R
A
M
M
I
N
G
/
M
A
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$3
6
,
8
4
0
$
3
9
,
9
7
0
$
4
4
,
0
1
0
$
4
,
0
4
0
10
.
1
1
%
30
6
4
EM
E
R
G
E
N
C
Y
MA
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
$6
,
0
2
5
$7
,
0
0
0
$1
6
,
4
1
2
$
9
,
4
1
2
13
4
.
4
6
%
31
1
3
PR
I
N
T
I
N
G
$1
,
7
7
5
$
1
,
5
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
(
$
5
0
0
)
‐33
.
3
3
%
31
1
5
CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$5
4
,
1
0
3
$
5
5
,
9
9
8
$
6
7
,
2
8
1
$
1
1
,
2
8
3
20
.
1
5
%
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$1
3
7
,
8
0
4
$
2
0
8
,
0
6
8
$
1
9
8
,
6
0
3
(
$
9
,
4
6
5
)
‐4.
5
5
%
41
1
0
HE
A
T
,
L
I
G
H
T
,
W
A
T
E
R
UT
I
L
$5
7
,
3
9
3
$
6
2
,
6
2
1
$
5
5
,
0
0
0
(
$
7
,
6
2
1
)
‐12
.
1
7
%
41
2
0
TE
L
E
P
H
O
N
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
$1
5
,
8
6
7
$
1
2
,
9
1
6
$
1
2
,
6
1
7
(
$
2
9
9
)
‐2.
3
1
%
UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
$7
3
,
2
6
0
$
7
5
,
5
3
7
$
6
7
,
6
1
7
(
$
7
,
9
2
0
)
‐10
.
4
8
%
01
-
4
0
F
I
R
E
24 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
01
‐40
FI
R
E
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
55
0
0
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐AU
T
O
LI
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
$3
,
0
2
1
$
2
,
7
8
9
$
2
,
7
8
9
$0
0.
0
0
%
55
0
6
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐GE
N
E
R
A
L
LI
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
$5
,
1
5
0
$
1
,
8
5
5
$
1
,
8
5
5
$0
0.
0
0
%
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
$8
,
1
7
1
$
4
,
6
4
4
$
4
,
6
4
4
$0
0.
0
0
%
61
9
0
AU
T
O
RE
P
A
I
R
S
$4
5
,
3
1
9
$
2
1
,
5
6
0
$
2
1
,
5
6
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
61
9
5
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$7
1
,
6
4
4
$
6
5
,
5
3
3
$
6
5
,
5
3
3
$0
0.
0
0
%
62
0
0
EQ
U
I
P
RE
P
A
I
R
S
/
N
O
N
VE
H
I
C
L
E
$7
,
8
8
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
$
4
,
0
0
0
(
$
5
0
0
)
‐11
.
1
1
%
63
3
0
RA
D
I
O
SE
R
V
I
C
E
$0
$
4
,
0
0
0
$
4
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
OU
T
S
I
D
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$1
2
4
,
8
4
3
$
9
5
,
5
9
3
$
9
5
,
0
9
3
(
$
5
0
0
)
‐0.
5
2
%
71
5
0
DU
E
S
& SU
B
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
$5
,
6
7
5
$
7
,
2
3
0
$
7
,
8
8
0
$6
5
0
8.
9
9
%
71
7
0
TR
A
V
E
L
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$2
,
8
6
4
$
1
4
,
8
2
0
$
1
4
,
8
2
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
72
0
1
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
BE
L
O
W
$5
0
0
0
$5
,
1
1
2
$
1
3
,
1
0
1
$
7
,
9
5
0
(
$
5
,
1
5
1
)
‐39
.
3
2
%
72
0
2
MI
C
R
O
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
SO
F
T
W
A
R
E
$0
$5
0
0
$5
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
72
2
1
OT
H
E
R
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$1
7
4
$
3
,
0
0
0
$0
(
$
3
,
0
0
0
)
‐10
0
.
0
0
%
72
4
0
TU
I
T
I
O
N
& TR
A
I
N
I
N
G
$2
5
,
4
2
8
$
2
6
,
8
4
0
$
3
1
,
1
4
0
$
4
,
3
0
0
16
.
0
2
%
72
4
1
EM
S
CO
N
T
I
N
U
I
N
G
ED
U
C
A
T
I
O
N
$1
6
,
3
8
7
$
1
7
,
0
7
6
$
1
7
,
8
6
7
$7
9
1
4.
6
3
%
74
7
5
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
‐‐
UN
D
E
R
$5
0
0
0
$4
4
,
2
5
3
$
5
,
8
5
0
$
1
7
,
4
0
0
$
1
1
,
5
5
0
19
7
.
4
4
%
77
2
5
FI
R
E
PR
E
V
E
N
T
I
O
N
$1
2
,
4
9
8
$
1
1
,
8
0
0
$
1
3
,
5
0
0
$
1
,
7
0
0
14
.
4
1
%
OT
H
E
R
$1
1
2
,
3
9
1
$
1
0
0
,
2
1
7
$
1
1
1
,
0
5
7
$
1
0
,
8
4
0
10
.
8
2
%
90
0
0
CA
P
I
T
A
L
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
RE
P
L
A
C
E
$7
1
,
1
1
8
$
7
7
,
1
3
3
$
8
3
,
4
3
5
$
6
,
3
0
2
8.
1
7
%
92
0
5
CA
M
E
R
A
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
$0
$0
$
1
8
,
0
0
0
$
1
8
,
0
0
0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
93
5
7
FI
R
E
FI
G
H
T
I
N
G
EQ
U
I
P
‐MA
J
O
R
$3
3
,
1
9
6
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
CA
P
I
T
A
L
EX
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
S
$1
0
4
,
3
1
4
$
7
7
,
1
3
3
$
1
0
1
,
4
3
5
$
2
4
,
3
0
2
31
.
5
1
%
TO
T
A
L
FI
R
E
$4
,
9
5
7
,
7
4
2
$
4
,
8
6
0
,
3
4
2
$
5
,
0
4
0
,
7
1
8
$
1
8
0
,
3
7
6
3.
7
1
%
01
-
4
0
F
I
R
E
25 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
01
‐50
PO
L
I
C
E
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
10
0
1
RE
G
U
L
A
R
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
$3
,
6
1
5
,
4
4
0
$
3
,
6
7
2
,
1
9
2
$
3
,
8
2
5
,
5
0
3
$
1
5
3
,
3
1
1
4.
1
7
%
10
0
2
OV
E
R
T
I
M
E
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
$2
9
6
,
5
8
7
$
3
0
6
,
5
9
0
$
3
4
2
,
7
0
2
$
3
6
,
1
1
2
11
.
7
8
%
10
0
4
MI
S
C
E
L
L
A
N
E
O
U
S
AL
L
O
W
A
N
C
E
S
$8
,
6
2
7
$
7
,
8
0
0
$
6
,
6
0
0
(
$
1
,
2
0
0
)
‐15
.
3
8
%
10
0
5
LO
N
G
E
V
I
T
Y
PA
Y
$2
2
,
6
9
5
$
2
2
,
8
6
1
$
2
5
,
1
5
2
$
2
,
2
9
1
10
.
0
2
%
10
0
6
ED
U
C
A
T
I
O
N
PA
Y
$5
6
,
4
1
1
$
5
8
,
5
0
0
$
5
3
,
7
0
0
(
$
4
,
8
0
0
)
‐8.
2
1
%
10
0
9
CE
L
L
PH
O
N
E
AL
L
O
W
A
N
C
E
$1
,
1
6
3
$
1
,
0
8
0
$
1
,
0
8
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
11
1
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
SH
A
R
E
F.
I
.
C
.
A
.
$2
9
1
,
5
4
6
$
3
1
0
,
0
6
7
$
3
0
9
,
5
1
0
(
$
5
5
7
)
‐0.
1
8
%
11
2
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
SH
A
R
E
T.
M
.
R
.
S
.
$5
4
5
,
9
1
6
$
4
1
7
,
2
8
9
$
3
4
0
,
3
8
5
(
$
7
6
,
9
0
4
)
‐18
.
4
3
%
11
3
0
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐EM
P
L
O
Y
E
E
LI
F
E
$2
2
,
5
0
9
$
2
3
,
0
2
5
$2
4
,
1
3
7
$
1
,
1
1
2
4.
8
3
%
11
3
1
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐WO
R
K
M
E
N
S
CO
M
P
$3
5
,
6
4
2
$
3
9
,
5
0
1
$
3
3
,
2
9
5
(
$
6
,
2
0
6
)
‐15
.
7
1
%
11
3
2
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐UN
E
M
P
L
O
Y
M
E
N
T
$1
4
,
9
4
4
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
11
3
5
HE
A
L
T
H
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
$4
5
9
,
0
0
0
$
4
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
5
9
,
0
0
0
$
9
,
0
0
0
2.
0
0
%
SA
L
A
R
I
E
S
& BE
N
E
F
I
T
S
$5
,
3
7
0
,
4
8
0
$
5
,
3
0
8
,
9
0
5
$
5
,
4
2
1
,
0
6
4
$
1
1
2
,
1
5
9
2.
1
1
%
20
2
9
CL
O
T
H
I
N
G
AL
L
O
W
A
N
C
E
$2
9
,
8
2
2
$
3
6
,
2
0
5
$
4
0
,
0
0
5
$
3
,
8
0
0
10
.
5
0
%
21
0
0
OF
F
I
C
E
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$1
0
,
1
3
8
$
9
,
5
0
0
$
9
,
7
5
0
$2
5
0
2.
6
3
%
23
1
8
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$7
5
9
$
3
,
1
0
0
$
3
,
6
0
0
$5
0
0
16
.
1
3
%
23
2
0
GA
S
,
OI
L
& GR
E
A
S
E
$8
2
,
3
3
2
$
9
2
,
7
1
4
$
9
2
,
7
1
4
$0
0.
0
0
%
23
5
0
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
& MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
$1
0
,
9
1
7
$
1
6
,
1
7
5
$
1
6
,
4
7
5
$3
0
0
1.
8
5
%
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$1
3
3
,
9
6
8
$
1
5
7
,
6
9
4
$
1
6
2
,
5
4
4
$
4
,
8
5
0
3.
0
8
%
30
1
0
PO
S
T
A
G
E
$1
,
8
8
9
$
3
,
6
5
0
$
1
,
6
0
0
(
$
2
,
0
5
0
)
‐56
.
1
6
%
30
1
1
DE
T
E
N
T
I
O
N
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$1
,
2
6
0
$
8
,
1
0
0
$
8
,
1
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
30
1
4
PU
B
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
$1
9
7
$
4
,
1
1
0
$
4
,
1
1
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
30
6
0
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$2
3
3
,
6
1
0
$
2
3
3
,
7
0
3
$
2
4
1
,
0
4
2
$
7
,
3
3
9
3.
1
4
%
30
6
2
AN
I
M
A
L
CO
N
T
R
O
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$8
,
6
7
3
$
1
2
,
8
7
5
$1
2
,
9
7
5
$1
0
0
0.
7
8
%
30
6
3
PR
O
G
R
A
M
M
I
N
G
/
M
A
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$1
2
1
,
7
4
4
$
1
2
7
,
4
2
8
$
1
3
1
,
4
5
2
$
4
,
0
2
4
3.
1
6
%
30
7
0
SP
E
C
I
A
L
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
$0
$
1
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
30
7
2
AC
C
R
E
D
I
T
A
T
I
O
N
EX
P
E
N
S
E
S
$6
,
9
8
5
$
1
6
,
4
5
0
$
2
2
,
5
0
0
$
6
,
0
5
0
36
.
7
8
%
30
7
5
DI
R
E
C
T
AL
A
R
M
MO
N
I
T
O
R
I
N
G
$5
3
,
2
8
8
$
4
7
,
9
8
9
$
7
5
,
7
6
5
$
2
7
,
7
7
6
57
.
8
8
%
31
1
3
PR
I
N
T
I
N
G
$8
,
1
8
9
$
1
1
,
1
0
0
$
1
3
,
8
0
0
$
2
,
7
0
0
24
.
3
2
%
31
1
5
CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$3
1
,
5
7
4
$
3
4
,
5
0
4
$
3
6
,
2
7
8
$
1
,
7
7
4
5.
1
4
%
32
6
1
WR
E
C
K
E
R
FE
E
S
$1
4
0
$5
0
0
$6
0
0
$1
0
0
20
.
0
0
%
32
9
1
GU
N
S
/
E
Q
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
$4
5
,
5
9
6
$
2
3
,
5
3
5
$
3
5
,
5
3
5
$
1
2
,
0
0
0
50
.
9
9
%
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$5
1
3
,
1
4
5
$
5
2
4
,
9
4
4
$
5
8
4
,
7
5
7
$
5
9
,
8
1
3
11
.
3
9
%
01
-
5
0
P
O
L
I
C
E
26 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
01
‐50
PO
L
I
C
E
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
41
1
0
HE
A
T
,
L
I
G
H
T
,
W
A
T
E
R
UT
I
L
$6
3
,
2
1
5
$
7
0
,
8
9
0
$
6
0
,
0
0
0
(
$
1
0
,
8
9
0
)
‐15
.
3
6
%
41
2
0
TE
L
E
P
H
O
N
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
$4
8
,
5
3
8
$
5
1
,
9
3
8
$
5
7
,
1
4
2
$
5
,
2
0
4
10
.
0
2
%
41
2
1
91
1
SE
R
V
I
C
E
FE
E
S
$5
4
,
3
6
3
$
1
4
8
,
9
6
0
$
1
4
8
,
9
6
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
$1
6
6
,
1
1
6
$
2
7
1
,
7
8
8
$
2
6
6
,
1
0
2
(
$
5
,
6
8
6
)
‐2.
0
9
%
55
0
0
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐AU
T
O
LI
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
$6
,
9
3
1
$
6
,
3
9
8
$
6
,
3
9
8
$0
0.
0
0
%
55
0
6
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐GE
N
E
R
A
L
LI
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
$6
,
2
3
8
$
2
,
2
4
7
$
2
,
2
4
7
$0
0.
0
0
%
55
0
8
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐PO
L
I
C
E
PR
O
F
LI
A
$1
2
,
0
0
0
$
1
4
,
0
0
0
$
1
4
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
$2
5
,
1
6
9
$
2
2
,
6
4
5
$
2
2
,
6
4
5
$0
0.
0
0
%
61
9
0
AU
T
O
RE
P
A
I
R
S
$3
7
,
4
4
2
$
3
9
,
7
0
7
$
3
9
,
7
0
7
$0
0.
0
0
%
61
9
5
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$9
6
,
8
7
3
$
1
4
7
,
9
2
9
$
1
4
7
,
9
2
9
$0
0.
0
0
%
62
0
0
EQ
U
I
P
RE
P
A
I
R
S
/
N
O
N
VE
H
I
C
L
E
$4
,
6
3
3
$
4
,
2
0
0
$
4
,
2
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
63
3
0
RA
D
I
O
SE
R
V
I
C
E
$4
5
2
$
2
,
4
0
0
$
2
,
4
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
OU
T
S
I
D
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$1
3
9
,
4
0
0
$
1
9
4
,
2
3
6
$
1
9
4
,
2
3
6
$0
0.
0
0
%
71
5
0
DU
E
S
& SU
B
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
$3
,
0
6
9
$
6
,
0
5
4
$
5
,
6
9
4
(
$
3
6
0
)
‐5.
9
5
%
71
6
2
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
E
PH
Y
S
I
C
A
L
S
$4
6
4
$
4
,
0
0
0
$4
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
71
7
0
TR
A
V
E
L
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$2
0
,
2
3
6
$
2
2
,
0
8
0
$
2
3
,
3
8
0
$
1
,
3
0
0
5.
8
9
%
72
0
1
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
BE
L
O
W
$5
0
0
0
$8
,
2
1
0
$
1
6
,
9
0
9
$
2
,
0
0
0
(
$
1
4
,
9
0
9
)
‐88
.
1
7
%
72
0
2
MI
C
R
O
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
SO
F
T
W
A
R
E
$2
,
2
7
7
$
1
0
,
3
5
0
$
1
0
,
3
5
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
72
2
1
OT
H
E
R
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$1
5
,
1
2
3
$
7
,
5
0
0
$
7
,
5
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
72
2
3
CR
I
M
E
PR
E
V
/
Y
O
U
T
H
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$1
,
3
7
3
$
2
,
8
0
0
$
2
,
8
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
72
4
0
TU
I
T
I
O
N
& TR
A
I
N
I
N
G
$2
1
,
6
8
5
$
2
6
,
9
1
0
$
2
6
,
9
1
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
74
7
5
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
‐‐
UN
D
E
R
$5
0
0
0
$1
5
,
7
6
7
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
OT
H
E
R
$8
8
,
2
0
4
$
9
6
,
6
0
3
$
8
2
,
6
3
4
(
$
1
3
,
9
6
9
)
‐14
.
4
6
%
90
0
0
CA
P
I
T
A
L
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
RE
P
L
A
C
E
$6
6
,
4
5
9
$
7
5
,
1
0
7
$
6
1
,
2
8
6
(
$
1
3
,
8
2
1
)
‐18
.
4
0
%
91
1
5
SM
A
L
L
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
$7
,
0
4
0
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
92
0
1
MI
C
R
O
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
$0
$
1
5
,
0
0
0
$0
(
$
1
5
,
0
0
0
)
‐10
0
.
0
0
%
CA
P
I
T
A
L
EX
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
S
$7
3
,
4
9
9
$
9
0
,
1
0
7
$
6
1
,
2
8
6
(
$
2
8
,
8
2
1
)
‐31
.
9
9
%
TO
T
A
L
PO
L
I
C
E
$6
,
5
0
9
,
9
8
1
$
6
,
6
6
6
,
9
2
2
$
6
,
7
9
5
,
2
6
8
$
1
2
8
,
3
4
6
1.
9
3
%
01
-
5
0
P
O
L
I
C
E
27 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
01
‐70
PA
R
K
S
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
10
0
1
RE
G
U
L
A
R
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
$1
,
3
2
5
,
4
5
6
$
1
,
3
2
7
,
4
0
1
$
1
,
3
2
1
,
2
1
5
(
$
6
,
1
8
6
)
‐0.
4
7
%
10
0
2
OV
E
R
T
I
M
E
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
$7
3
,
6
7
1
$
7
8
,
8
2
5
$
7
8
,
4
7
0
(
$
3
5
5
)
‐0.
4
5
%
10
0
5
LO
N
G
E
V
I
T
Y
PA
Y
$1
6
,
0
3
2
$
1
6
,
8
2
7
$
1
6
,
1
8
5
(
$
6
4
2
)
‐3.
8
2
%
10
0
7
CA
R
AL
L
O
W
A
N
C
E
$1
4
,
4
0
0
$
1
4
,
4
0
0
$
1
4
,
4
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
10
0
9
CE
L
L
PH
O
N
E
AL
L
O
W
A
N
C
E
$9
6
0
$9
6
0
$9
6
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
11
1
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
SH
A
R
E
F.
I
.
C
.
A
.
$1
0
5
,
5
7
3
$
1
0
7
,
9
2
1
$
1
0
7
,
9
3
0
$9
0.
0
1
%
11
2
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
SH
A
R
E
T.
M
.
R
.
S
.
$1
9
8
,
5
9
0
$
1
5
0
,
1
8
9
$
1
1
8
,
2
2
4
(
$
3
1
,
9
6
5
)
‐21
.
2
8
%
11
3
0
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐EM
P
L
O
Y
E
E
LI
F
E
$9
,
0
4
1
$
8
,
8
0
2
$
8
,
8
3
0
$2
8
0.
3
2
%
11
3
1
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐WO
R
K
M
E
N
S
CO
M
P
$1
1
,
2
1
4
$
1
6
,
1
5
3
$
1
2
,
6
0
4
(
$
3
,
5
4
9
)
‐21
.
9
7
%
11
3
5
HE
A
L
T
H
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
$2
1
6
,
0
0
0
$1
8
9
,
0
0
0
$1
8
0
,
0
0
0
(
$
9
,
0
0
0
)
‐4.
7
6
%
SA
L
A
R
I
E
S
& BE
N
E
F
I
T
S
$1
,
9
7
0
,
9
3
7
$
1
,
9
1
0
,
4
7
8
$
1
,
8
5
8
,
8
1
8
(
$
5
1
,
6
6
0
)
‐2.
7
0
%
20
2
9
CL
O
T
H
I
N
G
AL
L
O
W
A
N
C
E
$1
4
,
8
2
1
$
1
4
,
2
2
2
$
1
4
,
2
2
2
$0
0.
0
0
%
21
0
0
OF
F
I
C
E
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$5
,
6
4
7
$
2
,
5
5
0
$
2
,
5
5
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
23
1
8
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$2
6
6
$5
0
0
$5
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
23
2
0
GA
S
,
OI
L
& GR
E
A
S
E
$2
9
,
0
8
8
$
2
9
,
3
8
0
$
2
9
,
3
8
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
23
5
0
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
& MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
$5
2
,
9
3
7
$
4
8
,
2
0
0
$
4
8
,
2
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
23
6
0
SM
A
L
L
TO
O
L
S
$5
,
1
3
8
$
1
1
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
23
8
1
FE
R
T
I
L
I
Z
E
R
,
C
H
E
M
I
C
A
L
S
&S
U
P
$4
8
,
2
4
1
$
6
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
0
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$1
5
6
,
1
3
8
$
1
6
5
,
8
5
2
$
1
6
5
,
8
5
2
$0
0.
0
0
%
30
1
0
PO
S
T
A
G
E
$1
,
6
3
2
$6
0
0
$
1
,
6
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
16
6
.
6
7
%
30
6
0
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$9
,
2
6
0
$
8
,
0
0
0
$
8
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
30
6
3
PR
O
G
R
A
M
M
I
N
G
/
M
A
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$5
,
4
9
0
$
6
,
0
0
0
$
6
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
31
1
3
PR
I
N
T
I
N
G
$5
4
5
$8
0
0
$8
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
31
1
5
CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$1
9
2
,
5
5
9
$
2
4
4
,
8
1
0
$
2
4
4
,
8
1
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$2
0
9
,
4
8
6
$
2
6
0
,
2
1
0
$
2
6
1
,
2
1
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
0.
3
8
%
41
1
0
HE
A
T
,
L
I
G
H
T
,
W
A
T
E
R
UT
I
L
$1
1
8
,
6
4
3
$
1
3
0
,
4
3
0
$
1
1
0
,
0
0
0
(
$
2
0
,
4
3
0
)
‐15
.
6
6
%
41
2
0
TE
L
E
P
H
O
N
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
$7
,
9
5
8
$
6
,
5
0
3
$
8
,
3
9
7
$
1
,
8
9
4
29
.
1
3
%
UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
$1
2
6
,
6
0
1
$
1
3
6
,
9
3
3
$
1
1
8
,
3
9
7
(
$
1
8
,
5
3
6
)
‐13
.
5
4
%
55
0
0
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐AU
T
O
LI
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
$7
,
3
7
6
$
6
,
8
0
9
$
6
,
8
0
9
$0
0.
0
0
%
55
0
6
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐GE
N
E
R
A
L
LI
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
$3
,
1
4
6
$
1
,
1
3
3
$
1
,
1
3
3
$0
0.
0
0
%
01
-
7
0
P
A
R
K
S
28 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
01
‐70
PA
R
K
S
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
$1
0
,
5
2
2
$
7
,
9
4
2
$
7
,
9
4
2
$0
0.
0
0
%
61
9
0
AU
T
O
RE
P
A
I
R
S
$9
,
4
8
7
$
1
7
,
8
6
1
$
1
5
,
8
5
0
(
$
2
,
0
1
1
)
‐11
.
2
6
%
61
9
5
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$1
0
1
,
0
7
1
$
1
0
8
,
6
7
5
$
1
0
8
,
6
7
5
$0
0.
0
0
%
62
0
0
EQ
U
I
P
RE
P
A
I
R
S
/
N
O
N
VE
H
I
C
L
E
$1
0
,
0
1
1
$
6
,
2
5
0
$
6
,
2
5
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
62
0
5
PA
R
K
FA
C
I
L
I
T
Y
RE
P
A
I
R
$2
2
,
7
2
6
$
3
1
,
0
0
0
$
3
1
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
62
0
8
PA
R
K
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
RE
P
A
I
R
$2
3
,
0
0
2
$
2
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
63
8
0
FL
O
W
E
R
S
,
T
R
E
E
S
& SH
R
U
B
S
$4
2
,
4
2
7
$
5
1
,
0
0
0
$
5
1
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
OU
T
S
I
D
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$2
0
8
,
7
2
4
$
2
3
4
,
7
8
6
$
2
3
2
,
7
7
5
(
$
2
,
0
1
1
)
‐0.
8
6
%
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
71
5
0
DU
E
S
& SU
B
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
$1
,
2
7
9
$
2
,
1
8
0
$
2
,
1
8
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
71
7
0
TR
A
V
E
L
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$2
,
5
2
5
$
3
,
0
1
0
$
3
,
0
1
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
72
0
1
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
BE
L
O
W
$5
0
0
0
$2
,
0
2
8
$
3
,
1
9
9
$5
0
0
(
$
2
,
6
9
9
)
‐84
.
3
7
%
72
0
2
MI
C
R
O
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
SO
F
T
W
A
R
E
$0
$
6
,
0
5
0
$
4
,
0
5
0
(
$
2
,
0
0
0
)
‐33
.
0
6
%
72
2
1
OT
H
E
R
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$2
,
6
4
9
$
3
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
72
4
0
TU
I
T
I
O
N
& TR
A
I
N
I
N
G
$1
,
3
4
3
$
3
,
3
9
5
$
3
,
3
9
5
$0
0.
0
0
%
72
6
0
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
RE
N
T
A
L
$8
9
2
$
1
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
74
7
5
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
‐‐
UN
D
E
R
$5
0
0
0
$8
6
,
1
5
8
$
3
1
,
0
0
0
$
3
1
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
OT
H
E
R
$9
6
,
8
7
4
$
5
2
,
8
3
4
$
4
8
,
1
3
5
(
$
4
,
6
9
9
)
‐8.
8
9
%
90
0
0
CA
P
I
T
A
L
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
RE
P
L
A
C
E
$3
3
,
6
1
3
$
3
9
,
9
7
5
$
3
3
,
7
9
3
(
$
6
,
1
8
2
)
‐15
.
4
6
%
99
0
0
PA
R
K
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
$6
,
8
7
8
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
9
,
0
0
0
(
$
6
,
0
0
0
)
‐24
.
0
0
%
99
1
0
OF
F
I
C
E
FU
R
N
I
T
U
R
E
$0
$5
0
0
$0
(
$
5
0
0
)
‐10
0
.
0
0
%
CA
P
I
T
A
L
EX
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
S
$4
0
,
4
9
1
$
6
5
,
4
7
5
$
5
2
,
7
9
3
(
$
1
2
,
6
8
2
)
‐19
.
3
7
%
TO
T
A
L
PA
R
K
S
$2
,
8
1
9
,
7
7
3
$
2
,
8
3
4
,
5
1
0
$
2
,
7
4
5
,
9
2
2
(
$
8
8
,
5
8
8
)
‐3.
1
3
%
01
-
7
0
P
A
R
K
S
29 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
01
‐75
SW
I
M
M
I
N
G
PO
O
L
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
10
0
1
RE
G
U
L
A
R
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
$1
6
2
,
7
6
5
$
1
6
9
,
4
7
6
$
1
7
2
,
4
1
1
$
2
,
9
3
5
1.
7
3
%
10
0
2
OV
E
R
T
I
M
E
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
$1
0
,
1
1
7
$
7
,
6
5
2
$
1
0
,
1
0
8
$
2
,
4
5
6
32
.
1
0
%
11
1
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
SH
A
R
E
F.
I
.
C
.
A
.
$1
3
,
2
2
5
$
1
3
,
3
1
4
$
1
2
,
2
8
0
(
$
1
,
0
3
4
)
‐7.
7
7
%
11
3
1
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐WO
R
K
M
E
N
S
CO
M
P
$0
$
2
,
2
6
2
$
1
,
6
3
0
(
$
6
3
2
)
‐27
.
9
4
%
SA
L
A
R
I
E
S
& BE
N
E
F
I
T
S
$1
8
6
,
1
0
7
$
1
9
2
,
7
0
4
$
1
9
6
,
4
2
9
$
3
,
7
2
5
1.
9
3
%
30
1
0
PO
S
T
A
G
E
$4
2
$9
8
2
$5
0
(
$
9
3
2
)
‐94
.
9
1
%
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$4
2
$9
8
2
$5
0
(
$
9
3
2
)
‐94
.
9
1
%
41
2
0
TE
L
E
P
H
O
N
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
$0
$
1
,
5
0
7
$0
(
$
1
,
5
0
7
)
‐10
0
.
0
0
%
UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
$0
$
1
,
5
0
7
$0
(
$
1
,
5
0
7
)
‐10
0
.
0
0
%
61
8
9
SW
I
M
M
I
N
G
PO
O
L
RE
P
A
I
R
S
$3
4
,
8
6
5
$
1
8
,
0
0
0
$
2
3
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
27
.
7
8
%
OU
T
S
I
D
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$3
4
,
8
6
5
$
1
8
,
0
0
0
$
2
3
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
27
.
7
8
%
73
9
0
SW
I
M
M
I
N
G
PO
O
L
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$5
1
,
0
8
9
$
5
6
,
3
9
0
$
5
6
,
3
9
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
OT
H
E
R
$5
1
,
0
8
9
$
5
6
,
3
9
0
$
5
6
,
3
9
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
95
6
5
SW
I
M
M
I
N
G
PO
O
L
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
$0
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
CA
P
I
T
A
L
EX
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
S
$0
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
TO
T
A
L
SW
I
M
M
I
N
G
PO
O
L
$2
7
2
,
1
0
3
$
2
6
9
,
5
8
3
$
2
7
5
,
8
6
9
$
6
,
2
8
6
2.
3
3
%
01
-
7
5
S
W
I
M
M
I
N
G
P
O
O
L
30 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
01
‐80
ST
R
E
E
T
S
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
C
H
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
10
0
1
RE
G
U
L
A
R
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
$7
7
0
,
6
3
1
$
7
8
4
,
8
9
8
$
8
1
5
,
9
8
1
$
3
1
,
0
8
3
3.
9
6
%
10
0
2
OV
E
R
T
I
M
E
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
$2
3
,
6
9
0
$
1
9
,
2
7
9
$
2
5
,
6
4
3
$
6
,
3
6
4
33
.
0
1
%
10
0
5
LO
N
G
E
V
I
T
Y
PA
Y
$1
1
,
4
9
9
$
1
1
,
9
9
0
$
1
2
,
8
2
6
$8
3
6
6.
9
7
%
11
1
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
SH
A
R
E
F.
I
.
C
.
A
.
$6
0
,
1
3
1
$
6
2
,
4
3
9
$
6
5
,
3
6
7
$
2
,
9
2
8
4.
6
9
%
11
2
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
SH
A
R
E
T.
M
.
R
.
S
.
$1
1
1
,
8
7
1
$
8
5
,
6
9
7
$
7
0
,
5
7
8
(
$
1
5
,
1
1
9
)
‐17
.
6
4
%
11
3
0
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐EM
P
L
O
Y
E
E
LI
F
E
$5
,
8
5
5
$
5
,
2
0
4
$
5
,
4
4
7
$2
4
3
4.
6
7
%
11
3
1
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐WO
R
K
M
E
N
S
CO
M
P
$2
4
,
1
8
1
$
2
6
,
1
1
8
$
2
0
,
4
2
0
(
$
5
,
6
9
8
)
‐21
.
8
2
%
11
3
5
HE
A
L
T
H
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
$1
4
4
,
0
0
0
$
1
4
4
,
0
0
0
$
1
3
5
,
0
0
0
(
$
9
,
0
0
0
)
‐6.
2
5
%
SA
L
A
R
I
E
S
& BE
N
E
F
I
T
S
$1
,
1
5
1
,
8
5
8
$
1
,
1
3
9
,
6
2
5
$
1
,
1
5
1
,
2
6
2
$
1
1
,
6
3
7
1.
0
2
%
20
2
9
CL
O
T
H
I
N
G
AL
L
O
W
A
N
C
E
$1
1
,
2
7
1
$
1
1
,
9
2
1
$
1
1
,
6
6
5
(
$
2
5
6
)
‐2.
1
5
%
21
0
0
OF
F
I
C
E
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$6
8
0
$9
0
0
$9
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
23
2
0
GA
S
,
OI
L
& GR
E
A
S
E
$4
3
,
9
9
3
$
5
0
,
3
8
7
$4
5
,
3
8
7
(
$
5
,
0
0
0
)
‐9.
9
2
%
23
5
0
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
& MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
$1
2
,
4
8
3
$
9
,
6
0
0
$
9
,
6
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
23
6
0
SM
A
L
L
TO
O
L
S
$1
0
,
8
8
0
$
6
,
3
0
0
$
6
,
3
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$7
9
,
3
0
7
$
7
9
,
1
0
8
$
7
3
,
8
5
2
(
$
5
,
2
5
6
)
‐6.
6
4
%
30
1
0
PO
S
T
A
G
E
$2
8
$5
3
$3
0
($
2
3
)
‐43
.
4
0
%
30
6
0
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$0
$
1
,
5
0
0
$0
(
$
1
,
5
0
0
)
‐10
0
.
0
0
%
30
6
3
PR
O
G
R
A
M
M
I
N
G
/
M
A
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$6
9
4
$
1
,
7
3
4
$
1
,
0
0
0
(
$
7
3
4
)
‐42
.
3
3
%
31
1
3
PR
I
N
T
I
N
G
$0
$2
0
0
$2
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
31
1
5
CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$3
,
9
0
4
$
2
,
8
2
4
$
2
,
9
0
6
$8
2
2.
9
0
%
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$4
,
6
2
6
$
6
,
3
1
1
$
4
,
1
3
6
(
$
2
,
1
7
5
)
‐34
.
4
6
%
41
1
0
HE
A
T
,
L
I
G
H
T
,
W
A
T
E
R
UT
I
L
$4
,
0
9
3
$
4
,
3
2
2
$
4
,
3
0
0
($
2
2
)
‐0.
5
1
%
41
2
0
TE
L
E
P
H
O
N
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
$2
,
6
3
9
$
2
,
4
5
1
$
2
,
6
5
6
$2
0
5
8.
3
6
%
UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
$6
,
7
3
2
$
6
,
7
7
3
$
6
,
9
5
6
$1
8
3
2.
7
0
%
55
0
0
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐AU
T
O
LI
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
$1
0
,
1
3
0
$
9
,
3
5
1
$
9
,
3
5
1
$0
0.
0
0
%
55
0
6
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐GE
N
E
R
A
L
LI
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
$2
,
5
8
2
$9
3
0
$9
3
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
$1
2
,
7
1
2
$
1
0
,
2
8
1
$
1
0
,
2
8
1
$0
0.
0
0
%
61
9
0
AU
T
O
RE
P
A
I
R
S
$3
4
,
1
0
3
$
5
3
,
8
9
7
$
5
3
,
8
9
7
$0
0.
0
0
%
61
9
5
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$1
6
7
,
1
2
0
$
1
5
1
,
1
1
7
$
1
5
1
,
1
1
7
$0
0.
0
0
%
01
-
8
0
S
T
R
E
E
T
S
31 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
01
‐80
ST
R
E
E
T
S
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
C
H
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
62
0
0
EQ
U
I
P
RE
P
A
I
R
S
/
N
O
N
VE
H
I
C
L
E
$3
1
3
$6
7
5
$
1
,
0
7
5
$4
0
0
59
.
2
6
%
63
7
0
ST
R
E
E
T
RE
P
A
I
R
MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
$2
0
0
,
2
6
1
$
1
7
9
,
5
7
5
$
2
0
0
,
9
1
0
$
2
1
,
3
3
5
11
.
8
8
%
63
7
5
SI
D
E
W
A
L
K
RE
P
A
I
R
RE
I
M
B
U
R
S
E
M
E
N
T
$1
3
,
6
5
2
$
6
5
,
0
0
0
$
6
5
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
OU
T
S
I
D
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$4
1
5
,
4
4
9
$
4
5
0
,
2
6
4
$
4
7
1
,
9
9
9
$
2
1
,
7
3
5
4.
8
3
%
71
7
0
TR
A
V
E
L
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$1
8
6
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
72
0
1
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
BE
L
O
W
$5
0
0
0
$0
$
1
,
3
6
5
$
1
,
3
0
0
($
6
5
)
‐4.
7
6
%
72
2
1
OT
H
E
R
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$6
,
3
9
5
$
1
,
5
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
72
4
0
TU
I
T
I
O
N
& TR
A
I
N
I
N
G
$7
3
2
$
1
,
5
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
72
6
0
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
RE
N
T
A
L
$0
$
1
,
0
0
0
$0
(
$
1
,
0
0
0
)
‐10
0
.
0
0
%
OT
H
E
R
$7
,
3
1
3
$
5
,
3
6
5
$
4
,
3
0
0
(
$
1
,
0
6
5
)
‐19
.
8
5
%
90
0
0
CA
P
I
T
A
L
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
RE
P
L
A
C
E
$5
9
,
5
3
4
$
5
8
,
5
0
7
$
5
2
,
5
3
7
(
$
5
,
9
7
0
)
‐10
.
2
0
%
CA
P
I
T
A
L
EX
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
S
$5
9
,
5
3
4
$
5
8
,
5
0
7
$
5
2
,
5
3
7
(
$
5
,
9
7
0
)
‐10
.
2
0
%
TO
T
A
L
ST
R
E
E
T
S
$1
,
7
3
7
,
5
3
1
$
1
,
7
5
6
,
2
3
4
$
1
,
7
7
5
,
3
2
3
$
1
9
,
0
8
9
1.
0
9
%
01
-
8
0
S
T
R
E
E
T
S
32 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
01
‐85
TR
A
N
S
F
E
R
S
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
63
7
1
RE
P
A
V
I
N
G
OU
T
S
I
D
E
CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
$6
1
7
,
8
2
0
$
6
1
7
,
8
1
6
$
6
1
7
,
8
1
6
$0
0.
0
0
%
OU
T
S
I
D
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$6
1
7
,
8
2
0
$
6
1
7
,
8
1
6
$
6
1
7
,
8
1
6
$0
0.
0
0
%
71
5
3
CA
P
I
T
A
L
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
CO
N
T
R
I
B
$1
,
0
8
4
,
7
6
4
$
1
,
0
8
4
,
7
5
8
$
1
,
0
8
4
,
7
5
8
$0
0.
0
0
%
OT
H
E
R
$1
,
0
8
4
,
7
6
4
$
1
,
0
8
4
,
7
5
8
$
1
,
0
8
4
,
7
5
8
$0
0.
0
0
%
85
0
0
TR
A
N
S
F
E
R
S
$3
7
5
,
0
0
0
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
TR
A
N
S
F
E
R
S
$3
7
5
,
0
0
0
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
95
8
2
CU
R
B
& GU
T
T
E
R
$9
7
7
,
4
3
6
$
9
7
7
,
4
4
0
$
9
7
7
,
4
4
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
98
0
0
AL
L
E
Y
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
$3
5
2
,
1
7
6
$
3
5
2
,
1
7
3
$
3
5
2
,
1
7
3
$0
0.
0
0
%
CA
P
I
T
A
L
EX
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
S
$1
,
3
2
9
,
6
1
2
$
1
,
3
2
9
,
6
1
3
$
1
,
3
2
9
,
6
1
3
$0
0.
0
0
%
TO
T
A
L
TR
A
N
S
F
E
R
S
$3
,
4
0
7
,
1
9
6
$
3
,
0
3
2
,
1
8
7
$
3
,
0
3
2
,
1
8
7
$0
0.
0
0
%
01
-
8
5
T
R
A
N
S
F
E
R
S
33OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
02
‐11
UT
I
L
I
T
Y
FU
N
D
RE
V
E
N
U
E
S
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
34
5
0
WA
T
E
R
SA
L
E
S
‐RE
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
$7
,
6
2
9
,
4
6
7
$6
,
6
7
0
,
9
3
0
$7
,
1
9
8
,
2
3
1
$5
2
7
,
3
0
1
7.
9
0
%
34
5
1
WA
T
E
R
SA
L
E
S
‐CO
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
$3
2
0
,
3
7
8
$2
6
7
,
0
3
9
$2
9
7
,
2
2
1
$3
0
,
1
8
2
11
.
3
0
%
34
5
2
WA
T
E
R
SA
L
E
S
‐CH
U
R
C
H
/
S
C
H
O
O
L
$4
0
6
,
0
7
1
$3
3
8
,
2
2
0
$3
6
8
,
3
7
8
$3
0
,
1
5
8
8.
9
2
%
35
2
1
WA
T
E
R
SA
L
E
S
‐SM
U
$9
9
6
,
4
0
4
$7
9
3
,
1
7
0
$9
1
9
,
0
0
8
$1
2
5
,
8
3
8
15
.
8
7
%
35
2
3
ME
T
E
R
IN
S
T
A
L
L
A
T
I
O
N
$1
1
6
,
9
0
0
$9
5
,
6
0
0
$1
1
5
,
0
0
0
$1
9
,
4
0
0
20
.
2
9
%
35
2
4
WA
T
E
R
RE
C
O
N
N
E
C
T
I
O
N
S
($
2
0
)
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
35
2
5
TE
S
T
I
N
G
FE
E
S
$4
8
8
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
SU
B
T
O
T
A
L
WA
T
E
R
$9
,
4
6
9
,
6
8
8
$8
,
1
6
4
,
9
5
9
$8
,
8
9
7
,
8
3
8
$7
3
2
,
8
7
9
8.
9
8
%
35
3
2
SE
W
E
R
CH
R
G
‐SM
U
$3
2
7
,
3
2
0
$3
7
5
,
8
4
1
$3
6
8
,
4
5
4
($
7
,
3
8
7
)
‐1.
9
7
%
35
3
3
SE
W
E
R
PE
R
M
I
T
S
$2
0
3
,
8
1
5
$3
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
2
5
,
0
0
0
($
7
5
,
0
0
0
)
‐25
.
0
0
%
35
5
0
SE
W
E
R
CH
R
G
‐RE
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
$3
,
6
4
7
,
4
4
4
$3
,
8
1
2
,
4
3
2
$3
,
9
5
8
,
7
6
1
$1
4
6
,
3
2
9
3.
8
4
%
35
5
1
SE
W
E
R
CH
R
G
‐CO
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
$1
5
8
,
2
9
1
$1
5
7
,
9
2
0
$1
7
5
,
8
3
0
$1
7
,
9
1
0
11
.
3
4
%
35
5
2
SE
W
E
R
CH
R
G
‐CH
U
R
C
H
/
S
C
H
O
O
L
$1
1
9
,
6
6
5
$1
5
8
,
5
5
2
$1
5
4
,
4
1
4
($
4
,
1
3
8
)
‐2.
6
1
%
SU
B
T
O
T
A
L
WA
S
T
E
W
A
T
E
R
$4
,
4
5
6
,
5
3
5
$4
,
8
0
4
,
7
4
5
$4
,
8
8
2
,
4
5
9
$7
7
,
7
1
4
1.
6
2
%
39
0
3
ST
O
R
M
FE
E
‐CO
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
$1
8
,
1
2
8
$1
8
,
5
0
0
$1
8
,
5
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
30
9
4
ST
O
R
M
FE
E
‐RE
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
$4
1
1
,
3
4
3
$4
1
6
,
0
0
0
$4
1
2
,
0
0
0
($
4
,
0
0
0
)
‐0.
9
6
%
39
0
6
ST
O
R
M
FE
E
‐CH
U
R
C
H
/
S
C
H
O
O
L
$1
0
,
9
4
8
$1
0
,
2
0
0
$1
0
,
2
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
SU
B
T
O
T
A
L
ST
O
R
M
WA
T
E
R
$4
4
0
,
4
1
9
$4
4
4
,
7
0
0
$4
4
0
,
7
0
0
($
4
,
0
0
0
)
‐0.
9
0
%
38
5
0
AU
C
T
I
O
N
/
S
A
L
E
OF
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
$0
$2
,
0
0
0
$0
($
2
,
0
0
0
)
‐10
0
.
0
0
%
39
0
0
IN
T
E
R
E
S
T
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
$2
,
0
7
8
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
39
9
9
OT
H
E
R
RE
V
E
N
U
E
$1
7
,
7
2
4
$3
,
6
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
$1
,
4
0
0
38
.
8
9
%
SU
B
T
O
T
A
L
OT
H
E
R
$1
9
,
8
0
2
$3
0
,
6
0
0
$3
0
,
0
0
0
($
6
0
0
)
‐1.
9
6
%
TO
T
A
L
RE
V
E
N
U
E
S
‐
UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
FU
N
D
$1
4
,
3
8
6
,
4
4
4
$1
3
,
4
4
5
,
0
0
4
$1
4
,
2
5
0
,
9
9
7
$8
0
5
,
9
9
3
5.
9
9
%
02
-
1
1
U
F
R
E
V
E
N
U
E
S
34 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
02
‐21
UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
OF
F
I
C
E
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
10
0
1
RE
G
U
L
A
R
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
$2
4
0
,
5
2
2
$
2
4
5
,
0
7
2
$
2
1
6
,
3
6
6
(
$
2
8
,
7
0
6
)
‐11
.
7
1
%
10
0
2
OV
E
R
T
I
M
E
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
$3
,
0
7
5
$7
1
6
$
1
,
9
7
2
$
1
,
2
5
6
17
5
.
4
2
%
10
0
5
LO
N
G
E
V
I
T
Y
PA
Y
$2
,
7
6
4
$
2
,
9
9
0
$
2
,
0
0
3
(
$
9
8
7
)
‐33
.
0
1
%
11
1
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
SH
A
R
E
F.
I
.
C
.
A
.
$1
8
,
2
3
8
$
1
9
,
0
3
2
$
1
6
,
8
5
7
(
$
2
,
1
7
5
)
‐11
.
4
3
%
11
2
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
SH
A
R
E
T.
M
.
R
.
S
.
$3
5
,
0
8
0
$
2
6
,
1
2
2
$
1
8
,
5
1
8
(
$
7
,
6
0
4
)
‐29
.
1
1
%
11
3
0
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐EM
P
L
O
Y
E
E
LI
F
E
$1
,
6
8
9
$
1
,
6
8
0
$
1
,
3
4
1
(
$
3
3
9
)
‐20
.
1
8
%
11
3
1
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐WO
R
K
M
E
N
S
CO
M
P
$3
2
0
$3
2
4
$2
4
8
($
7
6
)
‐23
.
4
6
%
11
3
5
HE
A
L
T
H
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
$4
5
,
0
0
0
$
4
5
,
0
0
0
$
3
6
,
0
0
0
(
$
9
,
0
0
0
)
‐20
.
0
0
%
SA
L
A
R
I
E
S
& BE
N
E
F
I
T
S
$3
4
6
,
6
8
8
$
3
4
0
,
9
3
6
$
2
9
3
,
3
0
5
(
$
4
7
,
6
3
1
)
‐13
.
9
7
%
21
0
0
OF
F
I
C
E
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$1
,
3
1
6
$7
,
8
7
6
$7
,
5
7
0
(
$
3
0
6
)
‐3.
8
9
%
23
1
8
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$0
$2
5
0
$2
5
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
23
2
0
GA
S
,
OI
L
& GR
E
A
S
E
$7
2
8
$7
9
3
$7
9
3
$0
0.
0
0
%
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$2
,
0
4
4
$
8
,
9
1
9
$
8
,
6
1
3
(
$
3
0
6
)
‐3.
4
3
%
30
1
0
PO
S
T
A
G
E
$4
2
,
7
2
4
$
6
8
,
6
9
1
$
5
2
,
5
0
0
(
$
1
6
,
1
9
1
)
‐23
.
5
7
%
30
6
0
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$3
9
,
6
7
3
$
4
1
,
9
0
0
$
4
5
,
1
0
0
$
3
,
2
0
0
7.
6
4
%
30
6
3
PR
O
G
R
A
M
M
I
N
G
/
M
A
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$2
2
,
2
2
1
$
1
7
,
7
9
1
$
1
8
,
1
9
5
$4
0
4
2.
2
7
%
31
1
3
PR
I
N
T
I
N
G
$8
7
1
$
7
,
1
0
5
$
5
,
9
0
5
(
$
1
,
2
0
0
)
‐16
.
8
9
%
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$1
0
5
,
4
8
9
$
1
3
5
,
4
8
7
$
1
2
1
,
7
0
0
(
$
1
3
,
7
8
7
)
‐10
.
1
8
%
41
1
0
HE
A
T
,
L
I
G
H
T
,
W
A
T
E
R
UT
I
L
$1
1
2
,
4
7
5
$
7
2
,
8
1
4
$
1
2
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
7
,
1
8
6
64
.
8
0
%
41
2
0
TE
L
E
P
H
O
N
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
$2
,
1
6
5
$
2
,
7
8
2
$
2
,
7
6
8
($
1
4
)
‐0.
5
0
%
42
7
0
SE
W
E
R
PA
Y
M
E
N
T
S
$2
,
0
9
3
,
2
0
3
$
2
,
4
0
5
,
6
9
7
$
2
,
3
6
1
,
4
4
3
(
$
4
4
,
2
5
4
)
‐1.
8
4
%
42
8
0
WA
T
E
R
PU
R
C
H
A
S
E
S
$4
,
6
5
5
,
7
2
0
$
4
,
3
3
1
,
6
4
2
$
4
,
8
8
1
,
0
6
3
$
5
4
9
,
4
2
1
12
.
6
8
%
UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
$6
,
8
6
3
,
5
6
3
$
6
,
8
1
2
,
9
3
5
$
7
,
3
6
5
,
2
7
4
$
5
5
2
,
3
3
9
8.
1
1
%
55
0
0
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐AU
T
O
LI
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
$1
0
8
$1
0
0
$1
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
55
0
6
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐GE
N
E
R
A
L
LI
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
$8
,
0
2
2
$
2
,
8
8
9
$
2
,
8
8
9
$0
0.
0
0
%
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
$8
,
1
3
0
$
2
,
9
8
9
$
2
,
9
8
9
$0
0.
0
0
%
61
9
0
AU
T
O
RE
P
A
I
R
S
$0
$1
4
$1
4
$0
0.
0
0
%
61
9
5
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$1
,
2
6
5
$
1
,
2
6
7
$
1
,
2
6
7
$0
0.
0
0
%
62
0
0
EQ
U
I
P
RE
P
A
I
R
S
/
N
O
N
VE
H
I
C
L
E
$8
,
2
5
9
$
1
1
,
0
5
0
$
1
1
,
0
5
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
02
-
2
1
U
T
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
O
F
F
I
C
E
35 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
02
‐21
UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
OF
F
I
C
E
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
OU
T
S
I
D
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$9
,
5
2
4
$
1
2
,
3
3
1
$
1
2
,
3
3
1
$0
0.
0
0
%
71
5
0
DU
E
S
& SU
B
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
$0
$7
0
0
$7
2
5
$2
5
3.
5
7
%
71
7
0
TR
A
V
E
L
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$1
,
3
5
6
$
5
,
4
6
0
$
6
,
1
2
0
$6
6
0
12
.
0
9
%
72
0
1
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
BE
L
O
W
$5
0
0
0
$1
,
6
6
3
$5
0
0
$
5
,
7
0
0
$
5
,
2
0
0
10
4
0
.
0
0
%
72
0
2
MI
C
R
O
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
SO
F
T
W
A
R
E
$0
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
72
2
1
OT
H
E
R
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$5
4
8
$
2
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
72
4
0
TU
I
T
I
O
N
& TR
A
I
N
I
N
G
$1
,
9
2
4
$
2
,
5
0
0
$
1
,
9
0
0
(
$
6
0
0
)
‐24
.
0
0
%
72
4
5
TU
I
T
I
O
N
RE
I
M
B
U
R
S
E
M
E
N
T
$0
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
72
6
0
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
RE
N
T
A
L
$0
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
74
7
5
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
‐‐
UN
D
E
R
$5
0
0
0
$0
$
5
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
OT
H
E
R
$5
,
4
9
1
$
1
6
,
1
6
0
$
2
1
,
4
4
5
$
5
,
2
8
5
32
.
7
0
%
80
1
0
CO
N
T
R
I
B
U
T
I
O
N
TO
GE
N
.
FU
N
D
$6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
9.
0
9
%
TR
A
N
S
F
E
R
S
$6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
9.
0
9
%
90
0
0
CA
P
I
T
A
L
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
RE
P
L
A
C
E
$1
,
5
4
7
$
1
,
7
4
0
$
1
,
5
4
7
(
$
1
9
3
)
‐11
.
0
9
%
91
0
0
OF
F
I
C
E
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
$0
$5
0
0
$5
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
99
1
0
OF
F
I
C
E
FU
R
N
I
T
U
R
E
$0
$
1
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
CA
P
I
T
A
L
EX
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
S
$1
,
5
4
7
$
3
,
2
4
0
$
3
,
0
4
7
(
$
1
9
3
)
‐5.
9
6
%
TO
T
A
L
UT
I
L
I
T
Y
OF
F
I
C
E
$7
,
9
4
2
,
4
7
6
$
7
,
8
8
2
,
9
9
7
$
8
,
4
2
8
,
7
0
4
$
5
4
5
,
7
0
7
6.
9
2
%
02
-
2
1
U
T
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
O
F
F
I
C
E
36 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
02
‐22
UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
10
0
1
RE
G
U
L
A
R
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
$1
,
4
7
8
,
2
2
3
$
1
,
4
6
2
,
7
3
1
$
1
,
5
6
1
,
0
7
6
$
9
8
,
3
4
5
6.
7
2
%
10
0
2
OV
E
R
T
I
M
E
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
$4
8
,
3
3
8
$
4
5
,
5
4
7
$
5
4
,
9
1
9
$
9
,
3
7
2
20
.
5
8
%
10
0
5
LO
N
G
E
V
I
T
Y
PA
Y
$1
6
,
6
1
5
$
1
7
,
5
1
1
$
1
8
,
6
7
2
$
1
,
1
6
1
6.
6
3
%
10
0
7
CA
R
AL
L
O
W
A
N
C
E
$7
,
2
0
0
$
7
,
2
0
0
$
7
,
2
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
11
1
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
SH
A
R
E
F.
I
.
C
.
A
.
$1
1
2
,
0
2
8
$
1
1
6
,
4
7
6
$
1
2
4
,
7
7
2
$
8
,
2
9
6
7.
1
2
%
11
2
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
SH
A
R
E
T.
M
.
R
.
S
.
$2
1
1
,
1
4
6
$
1
6
0
,
9
6
4
$
1
3
5
,
6
2
4
(
$
2
5
,
3
4
0
)
‐15
.
7
4
%
11
3
0
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐EM
P
L
O
Y
E
E
LI
F
E
$8
,
7
8
8
$
9
,
6
8
7
$
1
0
,
4
1
7
$7
3
0
7.
5
4
%
11
3
1
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐WO
R
K
M
E
N
S
CO
M
P
$1
9
,
9
6
1
$
1
9
,
8
5
0
$
1
6
,
6
3
4
(
$
3
,
2
1
6
)
‐16
.
2
0
%
11
3
2
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐UN
E
M
P
L
O
Y
M
E
N
T
$0
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
11
3
5
HE
A
L
T
H
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
$2
3
4
,
0
0
0
$
2
3
4
,
0
0
0
$
2
4
3
,
0
0
0
$
9
,
0
0
0
3.
8
5
%
SA
L
A
R
I
E
S
& BE
N
E
F
I
T
S
$2
,
1
3
6
,
2
9
9
$2
,
0
7
3
,
9
6
6
$2
,
1
7
2
,
3
1
4
$
9
8
,
3
4
8
4.
7
4
%
20
2
9
CL
O
T
H
I
N
G
AL
L
O
W
A
N
C
E
$1
4
,
5
8
6
$
1
3
,
9
5
5
$
1
3
,
6
5
5
(
$
3
0
0
)
‐2.
1
5
%
21
0
0
OF
F
I
C
E
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$1
,
0
5
4
$
2
,
5
5
0
$
2
,
5
5
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
23
1
8
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$0
$5
0
0
$5
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
23
2
0
GA
S
,
OI
L
& GR
E
A
S
E
$6
8
,
8
2
3
$
8
1
,
1
6
6
$
8
1
,
1
6
6
$0
0.
0
0
%
23
5
0
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
& MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
$8
2
,
3
6
1
$
8
2
,
5
0
0
$
6
3
,
1
6
0
(
$
1
9
,
3
4
0
)
‐23
.
4
4
%
23
7
0
BA
C
K
F
I
L
L
MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
$1
3
0
,
6
1
9
$
1
4
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
5
9
,
0
8
0
$
1
4
,
0
8
0
9.
7
1
%
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$2
9
7
,
4
4
3
$
3
2
5
,
6
7
1
$
3
2
0
,
1
1
1
(
$
5
,
5
6
0
)
‐1.
7
1
%
30
0
3
BO
A
R
D
ME
E
T
I
N
G
S
$5
4
3
$4
5
0
$4
5
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
30
1
0
PO
S
T
A
G
E
$4
2
$2
0
0
$2
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
30
1
4
PU
B
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
$0
$
2
,
0
9
5
$3
0
0
(
$
1
,
7
9
5
)
‐85
.
6
8
%
30
6
0
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$1
1
3
,
2
0
7
$
9
9
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
9
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
10
.
1
0
%
30
6
3
PR
O
G
R
A
M
M
I
N
G
/
M
A
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$6
0
,
6
8
1
$
6
0
,
7
2
4
$
6
9
,
0
2
4
$
8
,
3
0
0
13
.
6
7
%
31
1
3
PR
I
N
T
I
N
G
$1
4
5
$5
0
0
$5
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
31
1
5
CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$6
,
3
6
9
$
4
,
6
0
7
$
4
,
7
4
1
$1
3
4
2.
9
1
%
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$1
8
0
,
9
8
7
$
1
6
7
,
5
7
6
$
1
8
4
,
2
1
5
$
1
6
,
6
3
9
9.
9
3
%
41
1
0
HE
A
T
,
L
I
G
H
T
,
W
A
T
E
R
UT
I
L
$9
,
8
6
8
$
1
1
,
6
8
6
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
(
$
1
,
6
8
6
)
‐14
.
4
3
%
41
2
0
TE
L
E
P
H
O
N
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
$6
,
3
5
8
$
4
,
0
4
7
$
7
,
7
2
3
$
3
,
6
7
6
90
.
8
3
%
UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
$1
6
,
2
2
6
$
1
5
,
7
3
3
$
1
7
,
7
2
3
$
1
,
9
9
0
12
.
6
5
%
55
0
0
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐AU
T
O
LI
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
$1
9
,
5
0
1
$
1
8
,
0
0
1
$
1
8
,
0
0
1
$0
0.
0
0
%
02
-
2
2
U
T
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
37 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
02
‐22
UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
55
0
6
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐GE
N
E
R
A
L
LI
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
$4
,
0
8
5
$
1
,
4
7
1
$
1
,
4
7
1
$0
0.
0
0
%
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
$2
3
,
5
8
6
$
1
9
,
4
7
2
$
1
9
,
4
7
2
$0
0.
0
0
%
61
9
0
AU
T
O
RE
P
A
I
R
S
$4
5
,
2
2
9
$
4
0
,
3
6
7
$
4
0
,
3
6
7
$0
0.
0
0
%
61
9
5
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$2
2
9
,
7
8
9
$
2
2
6
,
3
5
7
$
2
2
6
,
3
5
7
$0
0.
0
0
%
62
0
0
EQ
U
I
P
RE
P
A
I
R
S
/
N
O
N
VE
H
I
C
L
E
$3
,
4
9
1
$
1
,
7
5
0
$
2
,
1
5
0
$4
0
0
22
.
8
6
%
63
5
5
UT
I
L
I
T
Y
MA
I
N
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$3
6
2
,
3
3
0
$
2
3
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
3
,
9
2
0
$
1
8
,
9
2
0
8.
0
5
%
OU
T
S
I
D
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$6
4
0
,
8
3
9
$
5
0
3
,
4
7
4
$
5
2
2
,
7
9
4
$
1
9
,
3
2
0
3.
8
4
%
71
5
0
DU
E
S
& SU
B
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
$1
,
9
5
7
$
2
,
4
9
6
$
2
,
5
9
6
$1
0
0
4.
0
1
%
71
7
0
TR
A
V
E
L
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$2
,
7
5
0
$
1
3
,
2
6
5
$
7
,
9
4
5
(
$
5
,
3
2
0
)
‐40
.
1
1
%
72
0
1
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
BE
L
O
W
$5
0
0
0
$7
8
$
4
,
7
1
5
$
4
,
0
0
0
(
$
7
1
5
)
‐15
.
1
6
%
72
0
2
MI
C
R
O
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
SO
F
T
W
A
R
E
$0
$
1
2
,
5
0
0
$
1
,
2
0
0
(
$
1
1
,
3
0
0
)
‐90
.
4
0
%
72
2
1
OT
H
E
R
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$1
,
9
0
1
$
2
,
9
0
0
$
2
,
9
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
72
4
0
TU
I
T
I
O
N
& TR
A
I
N
I
N
G
$7
,
2
4
1
$
8
,
2
1
5
$
7
,
8
7
0
(
$
3
4
5
)
‐4.
2
0
%
72
6
0
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
RE
N
T
A
L
$0
$
3
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
73
3
1
PO
W
E
R
TO
O
L
S
$1
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
$
6
,
5
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
30
.
0
0
%
74
7
5
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
‐‐
UN
D
E
R
$5
0
0
0
$0
$
2
,
5
0
0
$0
(
$
2
,
5
0
0
)
‐10
0
.
0
0
%
75
0
0
DE
P
R
E
C
I
A
T
I
O
N
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$1
0
1
,
2
0
3
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
OT
H
E
R
$1
1
5
,
2
3
0
$
5
4
,
5
9
1
$
3
6
,
0
1
1
(
$
1
8
,
5
8
0
)
‐34
.
0
3
%
90
0
0
CA
P
I
T
A
L
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
RE
P
L
A
C
E
$8
6
,
0
3
4
$
9
6
,
8
2
3
$
9
2
,
8
4
0
(
$
3
,
9
8
3
)
‐4.
1
1
%
92
0
1
MI
C
R
O
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
$0
$9
,
0
0
0
$0
($
9
,
0
0
0
)
‐10
0
.
0
0
%
95
2
0
WA
T
E
R
SE
R
V
I
C
E
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
$8
,
7
5
6
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
CA
P
I
T
A
L
EX
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
S
$9
4
,
7
9
0
$
1
0
5
,
8
2
3
$
9
2
,
8
4
0
(
$
1
2
,
9
8
3
)
‐12
.
2
7
%
TO
T
A
L
UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
$3
,
5
0
5
,
4
0
0
$
3
,
2
6
6
,
3
0
6
$
3
,
3
6
5
,
4
8
0
$
9
9
,
1
7
4
3.
0
4
%
02
-
2
2
U
T
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
38 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
02
‐23
ST
O
R
M
WA
T
E
R
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
21
0
0
OF
F
I
C
E
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$3
5
9
$
1
,
5
0
0
$5
0
0
(
$
1
,
0
0
0
)
‐66
.
6
7
%
23
5
0
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
& MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
$4
8
0
$
8
,
5
0
0
$
6
,
5
0
0
(
$
2
,
0
0
0
)
‐23
.
5
3
%
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$8
3
9
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
7
,
0
0
0
(
$
3
,
0
0
0
)
‐30
.
0
0
%
30
1
0
PO
S
T
A
G
E
$5
6
9
$
1
,
1
5
0
$5
7
0
(
$
5
8
0
)
‐50
.
4
3
%
30
6
0
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$6
0
,
8
2
7
$
6
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
3
1
,
0
0
0
$
1
6
6
,
0
0
0
25
5
.
3
8
%
31
1
3
PR
I
N
T
I
N
G
$1
8
6
$
2
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$6
1
,
5
8
2
$
6
8
,
1
5
0
$
2
3
3
,
5
7
0
$
1
6
5
,
4
2
0
24
2
.
7
3
%
71
5
0
DU
E
S
& SU
B
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
$6
,
7
5
8
$
7
,
1
0
0
$
7
,
1
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
72
2
1
OT
H
E
R
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$8
6
2
$2
0
0
$2
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
72
4
0
TU
I
T
I
O
N
& TR
A
I
N
I
N
G
$2
,
9
2
4
$
5
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
OT
H
E
R
$1
0
,
5
4
4
$
1
2
,
3
0
0
$
1
2
,
3
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
92
0
1
MI
C
R
O
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
$0
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
CA
P
I
T
A
L
EX
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
S
$0
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
TO
T
A
L
ST
O
R
M
WA
T
E
R
$7
2
,
9
6
5
$
9
0
,
4
5
0
$
2
5
2
,
8
7
0
$
1
6
2
,
4
2
0
17
9
.
5
7
%
02
-
2
3
S
T
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
39 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
02
‐85
TR
A
N
S
F
E
R
S
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
63
6
5
FI
R
E
HY
D
R
A
N
T
/
L
I
N
E
IN
S
T
A
L
L
$1
7
5
,
8
9
6
$
1
7
5
,
8
9
3
$
1
7
5
,
8
9
3
$0
0.
0
0
%
OU
T
S
I
D
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$1
7
5
,
8
9
6
$
1
7
5
,
8
9
3
$
1
7
5
,
8
9
3
$0
0.
0
0
%
85
0
0
TR
A
N
S
F
E
R
S
$0
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
TR
A
N
S
F
E
R
S
$0
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
98
0
1
LI
N
E
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
$2
,
0
1
9
,
5
2
8
$
2
,
0
1
9
,
5
2
2
$
2
,
0
1
9
,
5
2
2
$0
0.
0
0
%
CA
P
I
T
A
L
EX
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
S
$2
,
0
1
9
,
5
2
8
$
2
,
0
1
9
,
5
2
2
$
2
,
0
1
9
,
5
2
2
$0
0.
0
0
%
TO
T
A
L
TR
A
N
S
F
E
R
S
$2
,
1
9
5
,
4
2
4
$
2
,
1
9
5
,
4
1
5
$
2
,
1
9
5
,
4
1
5
$0
0.
0
0
%
02
-
8
5
T
R
A
N
S
F
E
R
S
40 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
04
‐11
SA
N
I
T
A
T
I
O
N
RE
V
E
N
U
E
S
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
35
4
0
RE
F
U
S
E
CO
L
L
‐
RE
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
$1
,
8
6
0
,
8
9
7
$1
,
9
0
3
,
4
4
0
$1
,
7
5
0
,
3
0
0
($
1
5
3
,
1
4
0
)
‐8.
0
5
%
35
4
1
RE
F
U
S
E
CO
L
L
‐
CO
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
$3
1
6
,
0
2
7
$3
2
9
,
1
7
5
$4
3
8
,
6
0
0
$1
0
9
,
4
2
5
33
.
2
4
%
35
4
2
RE
F
U
S
E
CO
L
L
‐CH
U
R
C
H
/
S
C
H
O
O
L
$1
5
7
,
0
1
6
$1
9
0
,
5
7
5
$1
6
2
,
0
0
0
($
2
8
,
5
7
5
)
‐14
.
9
9
%
35
0
1
RE
F
U
S
E
CO
L
L
‐SM
U
$6
5
,
4
7
2
$1
6
1
,
1
2
3
$7
3
,
7
0
0
($
8
7
,
4
2
3
)
‐54
.
2
6
%
35
0
4
RE
C
Y
C
L
I
N
G
RE
V
E
N
U
E
$4
1
7
,
1
8
9
$2
9
1
,
0
6
0
$3
8
1
,
0
6
0
$9
0
,
0
0
0
30
.
9
2
%
35
4
3
BR
U
S
H
/
S
P
E
C
I
A
L
PI
C
K
U
P
CH
R
G
$7
6
,
3
9
1
$8
2
,
5
0
0
$7
0
,
0
0
0
($
1
2
,
5
0
0
)
‐15
.
1
5
%
35
0
3
YA
R
D
WA
S
T
E
BA
G
S
RE
V
E
N
U
E
$6
0
,
3
5
4
$8
4
,
7
0
0
$6
1
,
5
0
0
($
2
3
,
2
0
0
)
‐27
.
3
9
%
SU
B
T
O
T
A
L
CO
L
L
E
C
T
I
O
N
$2
,
9
5
3
,
3
4
6
$3
,
0
4
2
,
5
7
3
$2
,
9
3
7
,
1
6
0
($
1
0
5
,
4
1
3
)
‐3.
4
6
%
39
0
0
IN
T
E
R
E
S
T
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
$4
9
1
$3
,
0
0
0
$5
0
0
($
2
,
5
0
0
)
‐83
.
3
3
%
39
9
9
OT
H
E
R
RE
V
E
N
U
E
$0
$2
4
,
8
7
8
$0
($
2
4
,
8
7
8
)
‐10
0
.
0
0
%
SU
B
T
O
T
A
L
OT
H
E
R
$4
9
1
$2
7
,
8
7
8
$5
0
0
($
2
7
,
3
7
8
)
‐98
.
2
1
%
TO
T
A
L
RE
V
E
N
U
E
S
‐
SA
N
I
T
A
T
I
O
N
FU
N
D
$
2
,
9
5
3
,
8
3
7
$3
,
0
7
0
,
4
5
1
$2
,
9
3
7
,
6
6
0
($
1
3
2
,
7
9
1
)
‐4.
3
2
%
04
-
1
1
S
F
R
E
V
E
N
U
E
41 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
04
‐60
SA
N
I
T
A
T
I
O
N
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
10
0
1
RE
G
U
L
A
R
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
$1
,
2
4
8
,
1
5
9
$
1
,
2
2
7
,
4
3
8
$
1
,
2
1
9
,
8
9
4
(
$
7
,
5
4
4
)
‐0.
6
1
%
10
0
2
OV
E
R
T
I
M
E
EA
R
N
I
N
G
S
$2
7
,
6
0
6
$
3
8
,
7
0
6
$
4
4
,
0
0
7
$
5
,
3
0
1
13
.
7
0
%
10
0
5
LO
N
G
E
V
I
T
Y
PA
Y
$1
7
,
5
3
8
$
1
8
,
4
8
8
$
1
7
,
8
5
5
(
$
6
3
3
)
‐3.
4
2
%
10
0
7
CA
R
AL
L
O
W
A
N
C
E
$7
,
2
0
0
$
7
,
2
0
0
$
7
,
2
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
11
1
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
SH
A
R
E
F.
I
.
C
.
A
.
$9
5
,
6
1
9
$
9
8
,
8
2
5
$
9
8
,
6
0
6
(
$
2
1
9
)
‐0.
2
2
%
11
2
0
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
SH
A
R
E
T.
M
.
R
.
S
.
$1
7
8
,
1
0
3
$
1
3
5
,
6
4
1
$
1
0
6
,
4
6
7
(
$
2
9
,
1
7
4
)
‐21
.
5
1
%
11
3
0
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐EM
P
L
O
Y
E
E
LI
F
E
$8
,
0
6
2
$
8
,
1
2
7
$
8
,
1
3
0
$3
0.
0
4
%
11
3
1
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐WO
R
K
M
E
N
S
CO
M
P
$3
0
,
0
4
1
$
4
0
,
5
1
0
$
3
3
,
5
3
8
(
$
6
,
9
7
2
)
‐17
.
2
1
%
11
3
5
HE
A
L
T
H
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
$2
4
3
,
0
0
0
$
2
4
3
,
0
0
0
$
2
4
3
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
SA
L
A
R
I
E
S
& BE
N
E
F
I
T
S
$1
,
8
5
5
,
3
2
8
$
1
,
8
1
7
,
9
3
5
$
1
,
7
7
8
,
6
9
7
(
$
3
9
,
2
3
8
)
‐2.
1
6
%
20
2
9
CL
O
T
H
I
N
G
AL
L
O
W
A
N
C
E
$1
4
,
0
4
1
$1
3
,
2
3
2
$1
7
,
9
7
8
$
4
,
7
4
6
35
.
8
7
%
21
0
0
OF
F
I
C
E
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$2
,
2
1
3
$
3
,
0
6
6
$
3
,
0
6
6
$0
0.
0
0
%
23
1
8
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$0
$5
0
0
$5
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
23
2
0
GA
S
,
OI
L
& GR
E
A
S
E
$1
2
5
,
9
4
9
$
1
3
2
,
9
2
5
$
1
3
2
,
9
2
5
$0
0.
0
0
%
23
5
0
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
& MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
$1
2
,
4
5
7
$
1
8
,
1
8
2
$
1
3
,
2
3
6
(
$
4
,
9
4
6
)
‐27
.
2
0
%
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
$1
5
4
,
6
6
0
$
1
6
7
,
9
0
5
$
1
6
7
,
7
0
5
(
$
2
0
0
)
‐0.
1
2
%
30
1
0
PO
S
T
A
G
E
$2
,
4
0
7
$
4
,
1
0
4
$2
5
0
(
$
3
,
8
5
4
)
‐93
.
9
1
%
30
6
0
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$5
0
0
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
31
1
3
PR
I
N
T
I
N
G
$2
,
7
6
3
$
1
,
7
9
0
$
1
,
7
9
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
31
1
5
CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$5
,
1
3
7
$
3
,
7
1
6
$
3
,
8
2
4
$1
0
8
2.
9
1
%
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$1
0
,
8
0
7
$
9
,
6
1
0
$
5
,
8
6
4
(
$
3
,
7
4
6
)
‐38
.
9
8
%
41
1
0
HE
A
T
,
L
I
G
H
T
,
W
A
T
E
R
UT
I
L
$1
1
,
5
9
0
$
1
1
,
3
3
6
$
1
3
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
6
6
4
14
.
6
8
%
41
2
0
TE
L
E
P
H
O
N
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
$5
,
4
5
4
$
4
,
4
7
4
$
5
,
2
1
9
$7
4
5
16
.
6
5
%
43
9
0
LA
N
D
FI
L
L
$8
6
,
9
8
8
$
1
4
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
1
,
5
0
0
(
$
3
8
,
5
0
0
)
‐27
.
5
0
%
43
9
2
DI
S
P
O
S
A
L
FE
E
S
CO
N
T
I
N
G
E
N
C
Y
$0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
$1
0
4
,
0
3
2
$
2
5
5
,
8
1
0
$
2
1
9
,
7
1
9
(
$
3
6
,
0
9
1
)
‐14
.
1
1
%
55
0
0
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐AU
T
O
LI
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
$1
3
,
7
2
3
$
1
2
,
6
6
8
$
1
2
,
6
6
8
$0
0.
0
0
%
55
0
6
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
‐GE
N
E
R
A
L
LI
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
$3
,
4
1
3
$
1
,
2
2
9
$
1
,
2
2
9
$0
0.
0
0
%
IN
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
$1
7
,
1
3
6
$
1
3
,
8
9
7
$
1
3
,
8
9
7
$0
0.
0
0
%
04
-
6
0
S
A
N
I
T
A
T
I
O
N
42 OF 43
CI
T
Y
OF
UN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
PA
R
K
FY
2
0
1
3
BU
D
G
E
T
04
‐60
SA
N
I
T
A
T
I
O
N
LI
N
E
IT
E
M
S
AC
T
U
A
L
20
1
0
‐20
1
1
BU
D
G
E
T
20
1
1
‐20
1
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
20
1
2
‐20
1
3
CH
A
N
G
E
$
C
H
A
N
G
E
%
61
8
6
TR
A
N
S
F
E
R
ST
A
T
I
O
N
RE
P
A
I
R
$1
2
,
7
5
7
$
1
4
,
6
0
0
$
1
1
,
4
0
0
(
$
3
,
2
0
0
)
‐21
.
9
2
%
61
9
0
AU
T
O
RE
P
A
I
R
S
$7
2
,
2
1
3
$
1
5
5
,
8
5
4
$
1
5
5
,
8
5
4
$0
0.
0
0
%
61
9
5
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$2
2
3
,
9
7
0
$
2
0
0
,
4
4
9
$
2
0
0
,
4
4
9
$0
0.
0
0
%
62
0
0
EQ
U
I
P
RE
P
A
I
R
S
/
N
O
N
VE
H
I
C
L
E
$7
7
9
$
1
,
6
2
5
$
1
,
8
2
5
$2
0
0
12
.
3
1
%
63
1
8
CO
N
T
A
I
N
E
R
MA
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
$4
8
7
$
1
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
OU
T
S
I
D
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$3
1
0
,
2
0
6
$
3
7
3
,
5
2
8
$
3
7
0
,
5
2
8
(
$
3
,
0
0
0
)
‐0.
8
0
%
71
5
0
DU
E
S
& SU
B
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
$2
8
4
$
1
,
0
7
5
$
1
,
0
7
5
$0
0.
0
0
%
71
7
0
TR
A
V
E
L
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$3
6
$4
0
0
$4
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
72
0
1
CO
M
P
U
T
E
R
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
BE
L
O
W
$5
0
0
0
$1
,
5
8
6
$
1
,
9
6
5
$
1
,
9
0
0
($
6
5
)
‐3.
3
1
%
72
2
1
OT
H
E
R
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$3
,
0
1
5
$
6
,
4
6
5
$
6
,
4
6
5
$0
0.
0
0
%
72
4
0
TU
I
T
I
O
N
& TR
A
I
N
I
N
G
$2
,
0
0
8
$
1
,
3
6
5
$
1
,
3
6
5
$0
0.
0
0
%
73
5
0
YA
R
D
WA
S
T
E
PR
O
G
R
A
M
$2
4
,
9
0
8
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
73
9
2
CO
N
T
A
I
N
E
R
S
$3
7
,
5
0
1
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
75
0
0
DE
P
R
E
C
I
A
T
I
O
N
EX
P
E
N
S
E
$6
,
1
7
2
$0
$0
$0
#D
I
V
/
0
!
76
0
1
HA
Z
A
R
D
O
U
S
WA
S
T
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
$2
4
,
1
7
3
$
3
1
,
4
8
0
$
3
1
,
4
8
0
$0
0.
0
0
%
OT
H
E
R
$9
9
,
6
8
3
$
7
7
,
7
5
0
$
7
7
,
6
8
5
($
6
5
)
‐0.
0
8
%
90
0
0
CA
P
I
T
A
L
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
RE
P
L
A
C
E
$1
3
4
,
7
1
5
$
1
5
1
,
5
4
1
$
1
3
7
,
7
0
8
(
$
1
3
,
8
3
3
)
‐9.
1
3
%
99
1
0
OF
F
I
C
E
FU
R
N
I
T
U
R
E
$0
$5
0
0
$0
(
$
5
0
0
)
‐10
0
.
0
0
%
CA
P
I
T
A
L
EX
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
S
$1
3
4
,
7
1
5
$
1
5
2
,
0
4
1
$
1
3
7
,
7
0
8
(
$
1
4
,
3
3
3
)
‐9.
4
3
%
TO
T
A
L
SA
N
I
T
A
T
I
O
N
$2
,
6
8
6
,
5
6
7
$
2
,
8
6
8
,
4
7
6
$
2
,
7
7
1
,
8
0
3
(
$
9
6
,
6
7
3
)
‐3.
3
7
%
04
-
6
0
S
A
N
I
T
A
T
I
O
N
43 OF 43
1
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS
FINANCE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
THURSDAY, AUGUST 9, 2012 at 7:30 a.m.
UNIVERSITY PARK CITY HALL
SECOND FLOOR—CITY COUNCIL OVERFLOW ROOM
M I N U T E S
Attending: City representatives:
Atwood, John Austin, Kent--Director of Finance
Gordon, Dave Livingston, Bob—City Manager
Groves, Irving Moore, Dawn—City Council member
Lane, Alvin Tvardzik, Tom—City Controller
Noble, Julie
Reeder, Dotti Absent:
Russell, Thomas Cinatl, Cynthia
Stuart, John–Chair Coleman, Russ
Wilson, Claude Touchstone, Neill
1. Call to order.
Chair John Stuart called the meeting to order at 7:33 a.m.
2. Welcome new members
Stuart welcomed new members Alvin Lane and Dave Gordon and new City Council liaison
Dawn Moore. He asked the attendees to introduce themselves.
3. Review and approve minutes of June 7, 2012, Committee meeting.
Thomas Russell moved to approve the minutes of the June 7, 2012, meeting. Dotti Reeder
seconded, and the motion was approved 9-0.
4. Review and make recommendation regarding proposed FY2013 budget.
Kent Austin provided an overview of the proposed budget, which includes:
x No property tax increase
x Establishment of the University Park Public Library as a City department
x 3% pay raise for City employees and updating of TMRS service credits/COLA
x Balanced General, Utility, and Sanitation Fund budgets
x Rate increases (not yet specified) for water and wastewater
The budget was transmitted to the City Council August 7 and will be the subject of public
hearings August 21 and 28. Adoption is expected September 4, 2012.
2
Discussion ensued. The firefighter pension fund was mentioned, and Stuart asked that City
staff provide the new Committee members with a copy of the white paper from 2011 on the
City’s retirement funds.
Stuart then asked for a motion. Thomas Russell moved to recommend approval of the
budget as presented. John Atwood seconded, and the motion passed 9-0.
5. Receive updates:
a. June 30, 2012 fund report—Austin directed attendees’ attention to the report.
b. Status of water and wastewater rate study project—Austin said the City received three
proposals from consultants to perform a water and sewer rate study. Interviews are
being scheduled, and a request for City Council approval is expected in September.
Four members of the Finance Advisory Committee have volunteered to participate in
the study process: Atwood, Gordon, Groves, and Touchstone.
6. New business.
There was no new business.
7. Review meeting dates for 2012-2013.
All meeting dates are Thursdays at 7:30 a.m.:
x October 11, 2012
x December 13, 2012
x February 7, 2013
x April 11, 2013
x June 13, 2013
8. Adjourn.
The meeting adjourned at 8:35 a.m.
_________________________________ ___________________________________
John Stuart, Chair Kent Austin, Director of Finance
City of University Park
Property, Casualty & Liability Insurance Committee
MINUTES
August 23, 2012
A meeting of the Property, Casualty & Liability Insurance Committee was held on August 23,
2012. Attending the meeting were Chairman Frank Swingle, Bruce Klingman, Ed Orlandi, John
Palter, and Ron Ward. Also present at the meeting were Councilmember Bob Begert, City
Manager Bob Livingston, Finance Director Kent Austin, and Human Resources Director Luanne
Hanford.
Chairman Frank Swingle called the meeting to order at 4:40 pm. The committee first discussed
some follow‐up items from the previous meeting regarding Property and Cyber coverage. Ms.
Hanford said she had received all of the application materials for those coverages from Bob
Bookhammer. She also said that the underwriter at TML was hoping to have renewal numbers
to her the following week.
The committee then reviewed the liability coverage requirements in an agreement between the
Town of Highland Park and the City of University Park regarding a sanitary sewer line. Since
both the Town and the City will be renewing insurance policies on October 1, 2012, it is an
opportune time to make any necessary changes to the coverage requirements stated in the
agreement. John Palter said he could suggest some additional language to make it clear that
the agreement is only for the benefit of the Town and the City and does not apply to third
parties. Frank Swingle suggested that the discussion of limits be tabled until the renewal
numbers come back from TML.
The committee reviewed the Self‐Insurance Fund budget for the City’s insurance plan. Mr.
Swingle indicated that the addition of Cyber coverage and blanket property coverage might add
to the cost of the plan. Ms. Hanford suggested that the proposed budget stand for now and, if
necessary, we can do a budget amendment to cover the shortage from fund balance. Bruce
Klingman moved that the committee recommend the Self‐Insurance Fund budget to the City
Council for approval. John Palter seconded the motion. The vote was unanimous in favor.
The meeting was adjourned at 5:35 pm.
____________________________________ ____________________________________
Frank Swingle Luanne Hanford
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS COMMITTEE
MINUTES
August 28, 2012
A meeting of the Employee Benefits Committee was held on Tuesday, August 28, 2012.
Committee members attending the meeting were Chairman Roger Lambourn, Stephen Black,
Clair Crossland, John Falconer, Angela Fontana, Lance Johnsen, Jim Klancnik, Blair Mercer, and
Steven Moore. Russell Huber was absent and excused. Also in attendance were
Councilmember Bob Begert, City Manager Bob Livingston, Finance Director Kent Austin, and
Human Resources Director Luanne Hanford. The meeting was called to order at 7:40 AM. The
committee members all introduced themselves and stated what their background is.
Ms. Hanford explained to the committee that when the City Council receives the proposed
budget from the city manager, the Council refers it to three committees: the Finance
Committee, the Employee Benefits Committee, and the Property, Casualty & Liability Insurance
Committee for review and recommendation. The Employee Benefits Committee is charged
with reviewing proposed changes to pay and benefits and making recommendations to the City
Council.
The first item discussed by the committee was the proposed pay increase. Ms. Hanford told the
committee that the proposed budget includes a 3% across‐the‐board pay increase for all
employees. The last pay increase was in 2010, and the one before that was in 2008. The
proposed pay increase will be funded by a reduction in the city’s TMRS contribution from 10%
to 8.26% plus additional non‐property tax revenue. After a brief discussion, Clair Crossland
moved to recommend the proposed pay increase to the City Council. Roger Lambourn
seconded the motion, and the vote was unanimous in favor.
The next item discussed by the committee was the proposed TMRS Updated Service Credits
(USC) and Cost of Living (COLA) increase for retirees. Ms. Hanford explained that updating
service credits takes an employee’s salary changes and any plan changes adopted by the city
over time and assumes those increases and changes have been in effect throughout the
employee’s career. The proposed retiree COLA will increase the retirees’ benefits by 70% of the
increase in the CPI since the last time the COLA was adopted. A retiree COLA cannot be
adopted without adopting USC. The City last adopted USC and retiree COLA effective January
1, 2009. The City’s calculated contribution rate to TMRS dropped in 2012 from 13.87% to
7.25%. However, the City continued to contribute 10% in 2012 to “pay ahead.” The plan study
conducted by TMRS indicates that adopting updated service credits and retiree COLA will bring
the city’s rate to 8.26% in 2013. Ms. Hanford also pointed out that paying more than the
required contribution for the past two years along with changes made by TMRS in calculating
contribution rates has resulted in an unfunded actuarial liability of approximately ‐$2.9 million
and a funded ratio of 103.2%. If the city adopts USC and retiree COLA, the unfunded actuarial
liability will still be in the negative at about ‐$462,000 and a funded ratio of 100.7%. Clair
Crossland asked how adopting USC and COLA would affect the contribution rate in the future.
Ms. Hanford said that, based on the projection results provided by TMRS, the contribution rate
will remain stable through 2015 and then start to drop with a projected contribution of 8.06%
in 2019. The funded ratio is projected to remain above 100%. After discussion, Blair Mercer
moved that the committee recommend adopting Updated Service Credits and Retiree COLA as
proposed. Angela Fontana seconded the motion. The vote was unanimous in favor.
The committee then discussed the City’s proposed contribution to the Self‐Insurance Fund. Ms.
Hanford explained that two years ago, the City had dropped the contribution to the self‐
insurance fund to $750 per employee per month. For the past two years, the health plan has
remained in the black. In 2012, claims and expenses have increased to the point that the health
plan has just been breaking even with five months to go in the plan year. Ms. Hanford told the
committee that, even though claims and expenses were expected to increase, without renewal
figures for 2013, the decision had been made to maintain the current level of funding and cover
whatever shortages occurred with fund balance. Mr. Lambourn told the committee that he had
done some calculations on the City’s claims and contributions, and after calculating the industry
trend for expected increases in claims and stop loss insurance, his figures indicated that there
would probably be a shortfall of $350,000 to $450,000 in the plan for by the end of 2013
resulting in a much higher increase in city and employee contributions over the next two years.
There was a lengthy discussion regarding the projected shortfall and various solutions. The
committee discussed what effect “Obamacare” would have on the plan. Ms. Hanford told the
committee that the city’s health plan was still in “grandfathered status.” Mr. Lambourn
explained that “grandfathered status” would be lost if plan changes or premium changes
resulted in an increase of more than 5%. Then, the city would have to comply with all of the
current provisions of “Obamacare.” In 2014, grandfathered status will go away and all
provisions will have to be complied with. More discussion followed. Ms. Hanford pointed out
that if the upcoming plan renewal indicated the need to make changes to the plan or to
contributions, plan changes could be made later and a budget amendment could be adopted
later in the budget year, if necessary. The renewal from Cigna has not been received yet, and it
merits review prior to a final decision. Mr. Lambourn asked Ms. Hanford to contact the city’s
broker, Holmes Murphy, to request that the renewal be presented in early September. After
additional discussion, Clair Crossland moved that the committee recommend the health plan
budget as proposed with the caveat that increases or other changes may be recommended
after a review of the health plan renewal. Blair Mercer seconded the motion. The vote in favor
was unanimous.
Councilmember Bob Begert thanked the committee members for their service and told them
that he continued to be impressed by the amount of knowledge and expertise committee
members brought to the process. The committee members then watched a training video on
ethics. The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 am.
________________________________________ ___________________________________
Roger Lambourn, Chairman Luanne Hanford, Director of HR
AGENDAMEMO
(9/4/2012AGENDA)
TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil
FROM:KentR.Austin,DirectorofFinance
SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onapprovalofanordinanceadoptingtheFY2013budget
BACKGROUND:
SeepreviousagendaitemregardingpublichearingandfinalpresentationofproposedFY2013budget.
RECOMMENDATION:
ApprovetheordinanceadoptingtheFY2013budget.Thetotalbudgetof$44,275,593is2.90%
higherthanlastyear's$43,027,730adoptedbudget.Thebudgetiscomprisedofthreeseparatefunds--
General,Utility,andSanitation.
ATTACHMENTS:
OrdinanceadoptingFY2013budget
ORDINANCE NO. __________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS, ADOPTING A
BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2012, AND ENDING
SEPTEMBER 30, 2013; APPROPRIATING THE VARIOUS AMOUNTS REQUIRED FOR
SUCH BUDGET; PROVIDING FOR RECORDING OF THE ORDINANCE; PROVIDING
FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council has heretofore approved the tax roll prepared and presented
by the Dallas Central Appraisal District as required by the Tax Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager of the City of University Park has submitted to the City
Council a proposed budget of the revenues and expenditures of conducting the affairs of the City
and providing a complete financial plan for 2012-2013; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has received the City Manager's proposed budget, a copy of
which proposed budget and all supporting schedules have been filed with the City Secretary of the
City of University Park; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted the necessary public hearings as required by
law; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY
PARK, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the proposed budget of the revenues and expenditures of conducting the
affairs of the City of University Park, providing a complete financial plan for the ensuing fiscal year
beginning October 1, 2012, and ending September 30, 2013, as submitted to the City Council by the
City Manager, be, and the same is hereby, in all things adopted and approved as the budget of all
current revenues and expenditures of the City for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2012, and
ending September 30, 2013.
SECTION 2. That the sum of $4,275,593 is hereby appropriated for the payment of the
expenditures established in the approved budget, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made part
hereof for all purposes.
SECTION 3. That the City Council reserves the authority to transfer appropriations
budgeted from one account or activity to another within any individual activity of the City and to
transfer appropriations from designated appropriations to any individual department or activity.
That all transfers of appropriations budgeted from one account or activity to another within any
individual activity for the fiscal year 2011-2012 are hereby ratified and the Budget Ordinance for
2011-2012, heretofore enacted by the City Council, be, and the same is hereby, amended to the
extent of such transfers for all purposes.
SECTION 4. That all notices and public hearings required by law have been duly
completed. That the City Secretary is directed to provide a certified copy of the budget ordinance to
the County Clerk of Dallas County for recording after final passage hereof.
SECTION 5. That all ordinances of the City of University Park in conflict with the
provisions of this ordinance be, and the same are hereby, repealed.
SECTION 6. That should any sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section
of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, the same shall not
affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole or any part or provision thereof other than the part
thereof decided to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid.
SECTION 7. This ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage as the
law and Charter in such cases provide.
DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of University Park, Texas, on the 4th day
of September, 2012.
APPROVED:
____________________________________
W. RICHARD DAVIS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
ELIZABETH SPECTOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________
CITY ATTORNEY
EXHIBIT “A”
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS
FY2013 PROPOSED BUDGET BY FUND AND DEPARTMENT
8/7/2012
Fund / Org Unit / Department
FY2011 Actual FY2012 Adopted
Budget
FY2013 Proposed
Budget $ Change% Change
GENERAL FUND
Revenues
01-11 REVENUES $29,720,043$26,758,000$27,286,305$528,3051.97%
Total Revenues $29,720,043$26,758,000$27,286,305$528,3051.97%
Expenditures
01-02 EXECUTIVE $1,166,906$1,187,135$947,218 ($239,917)-20.21%
01-03 FINANCE $1,192,3861,059,604$1,023,093 ($36,511)-3.45%
01-04 HUMAN RESOURCES $351,049 363,849$354,043 ($9,806)-2.70%
01-05 INFORMATION SERVICES $918,087 996,662$980,320 ($16,342)-1.64%
01-06 LIBRARY $0 0$600,000 $600,000#DIV/0!
01-10 COURT $310,298 331,720$341,706 $9,9863.01%
01-19 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT $1,023,2811,016,899$1,155,595 $138,69613.64%
01-20 ENGINEERING $777,939 744,212$750,505 $6,2930.85%
01-25 TRAFFIC $810,201 848,934$862,322 $13,3881.58%
01-35 FACILITY MAINTENANCE $748,700 755,293$581,232 ($174,061)-23.05%
01-40 FIRE $4,957,7414,860,342$5,040,718 $180,3763.71%
01-50 POLICE $6,509,9826,666,922$6,795,268 $128,3461.93%
01-70 PARKS $2,819,7702,834,510$2,745,922 ($88,588)-3.13%
01-75 SWIMMING POOL $272,103 269,583$275,869 $6,2862.33%
01-80 STREETS $1,737,5301,756,234$1,775,323 $19,0891.09%
01-85 TRANSFERS $3,407,1963,032,187$3,032,187 $00.00%
Total Expenditures $27,003,169$26,724,086$27,261,321$537,2352.01%
General Fund Surplus/(Deficit)$2,716,874 $33,914 $24,984 ($8,930)-26.33%
UTILITY FUND
Revenues
02-11 REVENUES 14,386,443$ $13,445,004$14,250,997$805,9935.99%
Total Revenues $14,386,44313,445,004$ 14,250,997$ $805,9935.99%
Expenditures
02-21 UTILITY OFFICE $7,942,476$7,882,997$8,428,704 $545,7076.92%
02-22 UTILITIES 3,505,3983,266,3063,365,480 $99,1743.04%
02-23 STORM WATER 72,965 90,450 252,870 $162,420179.57%
02-85 TRANSFERS 2,195,4152,195,4152,195,415 $00.00%
Total Expenditures $13,716,254$13,435,168$14,242,469$807,3016.01%
Utility Fund Surplus/(Deficit)$670,189 $9,836 $8,528 ($1,308)-13.30%
SANITATION FUND
Revenues
04-11 REVENUES $2,953,835$3,070,451$2,937,660 ($132,791)-4.32%
Tot al Revenues $2,953,835$3,070,451$2,937,660 ($132,791)-4.32%
Expenditures
04-60 SANITATION $2,686,568$2,868,476$2,771,803 ($96,673)-3.37%
Tot al Expenditures $2,686,568$2,868,476$2,771,803 ($96,673)-3.37%
Sanitation Fund Surplus/(Deficit)$267,267$201,975$165,857 ($36,118)-17.88%
TOTAL REVENUES $47,060,321$43,273,455$44,474,962$1,201,5072.78%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 43,405,99143,027,73044,275,593$1,247,8632.90%
TOTAL SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)$3,654,330$245,725$199,369 ($46,356)
AGENDAMEMO
(9/4/2012AGENDA)
TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil
FROM:KentR.Austin,DirectorofFinance
SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onapprovalofanordinancelevyingthe2012propertytax
BACKGROUND:
Seetheagendaitemtitled"Publichearing--finalpresentationofproposedFY2013budget."
RECOMMENDATION:
Approvetheordinancesettingthe2012(FY2013)propertytaxrateof$0.27845per$100taxable
value.Thisisthesametaxrateas2010and2011(FY2011andFY2012).
ATTACHMENTS:
Ordinancelevying2012propertytaxrate
ORDINANCE NO. _____________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS, LEVYING
THE AD VALOREM TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 ON ALL TAXABLE
PROPERTY WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY
PARK AS OF JANUARY 1, 2012, TO PROVIDE REVENUES FOR THE PAYMENT OF
CURRENT EXPENDITURES; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES
IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, all notices have been given and public hearings held as required by law to
adopt a tax rate for 2012;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That there be and is hereby levied for the year 2012, on all taxable property,
real, personal and mixed, situated within the limits of the City of University Park, Texas as of
January 1, 2012, and not exempt by the Constitution of the State and valid State laws, a tax of
$0.27845 on each $100.00 assessed valuation of taxable property, and such taxes shall be
apportioned and distributed as follows:
(A) $0.27845 on each and every $100.00 valuation of said property is hereby levied and
assessed to provide revenues for maintenance and operations of City government
and current expenses thereof; and
(B) That no rate is set for debt service because the City of University Park currently has
no bonded indebtedness.
SECTION 2. That all ad valorem taxes shall become due and payable on October 1, 2012,
and all ad valorem taxes for the year shall become delinquent after January 31, 2013. That in
addition to any statutory exemptions for the 2012 tax year, the City Council hereby authorizes a
General Homestead Exemption of twenty percent (20%) of the assessed value and an Over Sixty-
five Years of Age and Disabled Exemption of $275,000.00 on the assessed value.
SECTION 3. That a delinquent tax shall incur all penalty and interest authorized by law,
including a penalty of six percent (6%) on the amount of the tax for the first calendar month it is
delinquent, plus one percent (1%) for each additional month or portion of a month the tax remains
unpaid prior to July 1 of the year in which it becomes delinquent. A tax delinquent on July 1 incurs
a total penalty of twelve percent (12%) of the amount of the delinquent tax, without regard to the
number of months the tax has been delinquent. A delinquent tax shall also accrue at the rate of one
percent (1%) for each month or portion of a month the tax remains unpaid. Taxes that remain
delinquent on July 1, 2013, incur an additional penalty of fifteen percent (15%) of the amount of the
taxes, penalty and interest due. Such additional penalty is to defray costs of collection due to a
contract with the City's tax collection attorney pursuant to Section 33.07 of the Tax Code.
SECTION 4. That all ordinances of the City of University Park in conflict with the
provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed.
SECTION 5. That should any sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section
of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, the same shall not
affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole or any part or provision thereof other than the part
thereof decided to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid.
SECTION 6. This ordinance shall take effect on October 1, 2012.
DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of University Park, Texas, on the 4th day
of September, 2012.
APPROVED:
____________________________________
W. RICHARD DAVIS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
___________________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
ELIZABETH SPECTOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________
CITY ATTORNEY
AGENDAMEMO
(9/4/2012AGENDA)
TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil
FROM:KentR.Austin,DirectorofFinance
SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onordinanceadoptingFY2013payplan
BACKGROUND:
Seeagendaitemtitled"publichearing--FY2013proposedbudgetfinalpresentation."
RECOMMENDATION:
ApprovetheordinanceadoptingtheFY2013payplan,whichsupportstheFY2013budget.Theplan
includesa3%market-basedpayincreaseforallfull-timeemployees.About15%ofemployeesare
eligibleforanadditional3%meritincrease..
ATTACHMENTS:
OrdinanceadoptingFY2013payplan
ORDINANCE NO. ______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS, REPEALING
AND REPLACING ORDINANCE NO. 11/22 AND ORDINANCE NO. 12/01 BY
ADOPTING A REVISED PAY PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF
UNIVERSITY PARK FOR FY 2012-2013, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY
PARK, TEXAS:
Ordinance No. 11/22 AND Ordinance No. 12/01 are repealed and the following
ordinance is adopted to replace them:
SECTION I
As provided in Chapter 8, Article 8.500, of the Code of Ordinances of the City of
University Park, Texas, a pay plan to compensate employees of the City of University
Park for FY 2012-2013 is adopted to wit:
1. PAY PLAN BY CATEGORIES:
EXEMPT EMPLOYEES
_____________________________________________________________________________________
TITLE POINTS MIN. MARKET MAX.
CITY MANAGER E 950 15721
CITY JUDGE E 930 3789
CITY PROSECUTOR E 920 2868
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS E 904 9937 11503 13736
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE E 755 8674 10041 11990
FIRE CHIEF E 732 8480 9817 11722
DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES E 677 8014 9277 11077
DIRECTOR OF PARKS E 636 7666 8874 10596
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT E 611 7455 8630 10305
CITY ENGINEER E 611 7455 8630 10305
POLICE CAPTAIN E 594 7311 8463 10106
ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF E 594 7311 8463 10106
DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION SERVICES E 588 7259 8403 10034
CONTROLLER E 551 6945 8040 9600
ASST. DIR. OF PUBLIC WORKS E 551 6945 8040 9600
LIBRARY DIRECTOR E 511 6585 7260 9102
INFRASTRUCTURE MAINT. SUPT. E 479 6402 7411 8849
CHIEF PLANNING OFFICIAL E 466 6140 7108 8487
CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL E 466 6140 7108 8487
SANITATION SUPERINTENDENT E 421 5845 6766 8079
FLEET MANAGER E 406 5719 6620 7905
CIP COORDINATOR/CONST. MANAGER E 393 5617 6502 7764
SR. NETWORK ADMINISTRATOR E 393 5617 6502 7764
COMMUNITY INFORMATION OFFICER E 382 5516 6385 7625
CITY SECRETARY E 382 5516 6385 7625
TRAFFIC SUPERINTENDENT E 366 5381 6229 7438
ACCOUNTING MANAGER E 344 5194 6013 7179
NETWORK SUPPORT SPECIALIST E 344 5194 6013 7179
GIS COORDINATOR E 344 5194 6013 7179
ASSET MANAGEMENT COORDINATOR E 344 5194 6013 7179
RIGHT OF WAY MANAGER E 344 5194 6013 7179
PURCHASING AGENT E 332 5071 5870 7009
POLICE ACCREDITATION MGR (PT) E 332 5071 5870 7009
POLICE COMM./RECORDS SUPERVISOR E 332 5071 5870 7009
ASSISTANT PARK DIRECTOR E 318 4975 5759 6877
PARKS SUPERINTENDENT E 318 4975 5759 6877
COURT ADMINISTRATOR E 308 4888 5658 6757
ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER E 298 4860 5626 6718
TECHNICAL SERVICES LIBRARIAN E 298 4860 5626 6718
CHILDREN’S LIBRARIAN E 298 4860 5626 6718
UTILITY BILLING MANAGER E 291 4745 5493 6559
ASSTISTANT CITY SECRETARY (PT) E 223 3949 4571 5459
NON-EXEMPT EMPLOYEES
_____________________________________________________________________________________
TITLE GRADE PTS. MIN. MARKET MAX.
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR N 58 296 4663 5398 6446
BUILDING INSPECTOR III N 58 296 4663 5398 6446
EQUIP. SHOP SUPERVISOR N 57 269 4330 5013 5985
SANITATION CREW LEADER N 57 269 4330 5013 5985
MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR N 57 269 4330 5013 5985
BUILDING INSPECTOR II N 57 269 4330 5013 5985
BUILDING INSPECTOR I N 56 245 4037 4673 5580
WAREHOUSE SUPERVISOR N 56 245 4037 4673 5580
CODE ENFORCEMENT OFCR. N 56 245 4037 4673 5580
ENGINEERING TECH. N 56 245 4037 4673 5580
TRAFFIC TECHNICIAN II N 56 245 4037 4673 5580
EQUIP SERVICES TECH-ELECTRONICS N 56 245 4037 4673 5580
PAYROLL/AP SPECIALIST N 56 245 4037 4673 5580
FIRE ADMIN. ASSISTANT N 55 216 3680 4260 5087
POLICE ADMIN. ASSISTANT N 55 216 3680 4260 5087
HUMAN RESOURCES ASSISTANT N 55 216 3680 4260 5087
GARDENER III N 55 216 3680 4260 5087
FORESTRY TECHNICIAN N 55 216 3680 4260 5087
HORTICULTURIST N 55 216 3680 4260 5087
IRRIGATION TECHNICIAN N 55 216 3680 4260 5087
PESTICIDE TECHNICIAN N 55 216 3680 4260 5087
EQUIP. SERVICE TECHNICIAN N 55 216 3680 4260 5087
WELDING TECHNICIAN N 55 216 3680 4260 5087
DISPATCHER/311 CALL TAKER N 55 216 3680 4260 5087
PURCHASING ASSISTANT N 54 191 3373 3905 4662
PLANNING TECH N 54 191 3373 3905 4662
PERMIT TECH N 54 191 3373 3905 4662
WAREHOUSE/EQUIP SERV ASST N 54 191 3373 3905 4662
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SPECIALIST N 54 191 3373 3905 4662
FACILITIES MAINT. TECH. N 54 191 3373 3905 4662
ADMIN SECRETARY/311 CALL TAKER N 54 191 3373 3905 4662
ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER N 54 191 3373 3905 4662
SIGNS/MARKINGS TECH II N 54 191 3373 3905 4662
MAINTENANCE TECH II N 54 191 3373 3905 4662
SR. UTILITY BILLING SPECIALIST N 53 160 2993 3465 4137
ADMIN. SECRETARY N 53 160 2993 3465 4137
PARKING ENFORCEMENT OFFICER N 53 160 2993 3465 4137
SANITATION DRIVER III N 53 160 2993 3465 4137
TRAFFIC TECHNICIAN I N 53 160 2993 3465 4137
POLICE ALARM PERMIT CLERK N 53 160 2993 3465 4137
RECEPTIONIST/311 CALL TAKER N 53 160 2993 3465 4137
SIGNS/MARKINGS TECH I N 52 143 2783 3222 3847
LEAD CUSTODIAN N 52 143 2783 3222 3847
CID CLERK (PT) N 52 143 2783 3222 3847
COMMUNITY DEV. CLERK (PT) N 52 143 2783 3222 3847
UTILITY BILLING SPECIALIST N 52 143 2783 3222 3847
MAIL/UTILITY BILLING SPECIALIST N 52 143 2783 3222 3847
DEPUTY COURT CLERK N 52 143 2783 3222 3847
SANITATION DRIVER II N 52 143 2783 3222 3847
GARDENER II N 52 143 2783 3222 3847
MAINTENANCE TECH I N 52 143 2783 3222 3847
SANITATION DRIVER I N 51 119 2488 2880 3439
WAREHOUSE PARTS RUNNER N 51 119 2488 2880 3439
GARDENER I N 50 99 2244 2598 3102
POLICE DEPARTMENT
_____________________________________________________________________________________
TITLE STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 4 STEP 5 STEP 6
_____________________________________________________________________________________
POLICE LT. 7079 7432
POLICE SGT. 6421 6742
POLICE OFFICER 4711 4947 5194 5454 5726 6013
POLICE RECRUIT 4266 4479
FIRE DEPARTMENT
_____________________________________________________________________________________
TITLE STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 4 STEP 5 STEP 6
_____________________________________________________________________________________
BATTALION CHIEF 7478 7852
FIRE CAPTAIN 6787 7126
ASST. FIRE MARSHAL 6477
FIRE LIEUTENANT 6477
DRIVER/ENGINEER 6157
FIREFIGHTER 4488 4712 4948 5195 5455 5728
FF RECRUIT 3989
PART TIME AND TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES
Pay to be determined by the Director of Human Resources.
2. PAY PLAN ADMINISTRATION:
(a) Non-uniformed Pay Plan. The pay plan presented herein for positions except uniformed police
and fire defines the range of pay for each position in the city. There will be two steps between minimum
and market, with minimum designated as Step 1 and market pay designated as Step 4, that range being
designated as the desired hiring and probationary range. Market pay (Step 4) of each range is considered
the rate of pay for a fully trained, competent employee. There will be five steps between market pay and
maximum, with maximum designated as Step 10, that range being designated for merit pay. Progression
from one step to the next higher step shall be based solely on performance as approved by the department
head or city manager and will be effective on an employee’s evaluation date.
(b) Uniformed Police and Fire Pay Plan. In order to receive a step increase, each employee must meet
the time-in-service requirement and have a performance evaluation that is at least “Meets Expectations.” If
an employee does not meet the performance evaluation requirement, the supervisor may set a time for re-
evaluation and reconsideration of the step increase if improved performance is recognized.
3, ASSIGNMENT PAY:
Paramedic and Fire Inspector positions are not specified as rank, but are designated as an assignment and
receive assignment pay as follows:
0-4 YRS OF SERVICE $175/MO ASSIGNMENT PAY
5-9 YRS OF SERVICE $250/MO ASSIGNMENT PAY
10-14 YRS OF SERVICE $325/MO ASSIGNMENT PAY
15+ YRS OF SERVICE $400/MO ASSIGNMENT PAY
FIRE INSPECTOR $100 PER MONTH ASSIGNMENT PAY
EMS SHIFT LT. $200 PER MONTH ASSIGNMENT PAY
Paramedic and Fire Inspector assignment pay will be in addition to the pay allocated for the rank at the
time of assignment. For example, a Firefighter assigned as paramedic will receive the pay for a Firefighter
plus assignment pay appropriate to his/her years of service as a certified paramedic in the University Park
Fire Department (designated above) plus $35 for each shift assigned to the MICU. Fire Department
employees will not be eligible for assignment pay while on leave for any reason.
Police officers assigned to CID and the Warrant Officer will receive an assignment pay of 5% of base pay.
Field Training Officers will receive assignment pay of 5% of base pay when assigned and working as a
Field Training Officer.
911/311 Dispatchers assigned to training duty will receive an assignment pay of 5% of base pay when
assigned and working as a trainer.
4. WORK EXPERIENCE PERIOD:
The work experience period is one year under normal circumstances for uniformed police and fire and six
months for all other employees. Nothing herein prevents the extension of a work experience period or
prevents any department head from delaying or withholding pay increases for just and compelling reasons.
5. SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL PAY:
Dispatchers who work the evening shift will receive an additional pay of $25 per month. Police Officers,
Police Sergeants, Police Lieutenants, and Dispatchers who work deep night shift will receive an additional
pay of $50 per month. These employees must maintain a performance evaluation that “Meets Expectations”
in order to be eligible for the shift differential pay.
6. LONGEVITY:
All police and fire personnel shall receive the State of Texas mandated payment of four dollars ($4.00) per
month for each year of service up to a maximum of 25 years. All other employees of the City shall receive
longevity pay at the same rate as police and fire personnel. For the purpose of this section, longevity
accrual begins at the start of each month after the anniversary date, unless such anniversary date is on the
first of the month.
7. EDUCATION AND CERTIFICATION PAY:
(a) Uniformed personnel in the Fire Department shall receive incentive pay for college credit hours
from an accredited university. This plan does not include the rank of Captain or higher except as designated
below. Fire Lieutenant is eligible for education pay only for eighteen hours and above.
1. Twelve (12) hours $20.00 per month
2. Eighteen (18) hours $30.00 per month
3. Thirty-six (36) hours $40.00 per month
4. Assoc. degree or 60 hours $50.00 per month
5. Bachelor’s degree $100.00 per month
Fire Captains will be eligible for incentive pay for college credit hours from an accredited university under
the following plan:
1. 36 hours $40.00 per month
2. Assoc. degree or 60 hours $50.00 per month
3. Bachelor’s degree $100.00 per month
Fire Battalion Chiefs will be eligible for incentive pay for college credit hours from an accredited university
under the following plan:
1. Bachelor’s degree $100.00 per month
The Fire Chief must review and approve the subjects and the plan of study prior to instigation by the
employee in order to eligible for the pay described above.
In addition to the above, uniformed Fire Department personnel will be eligible for the following incentive
pay for certification beyond basic. This does not pertain to ranks of Captain and above except as designated
below:
1. Intermediate $50.00 per month
2. Advanced $100.00 per month
3. Master’s $150.00 per month
Fire Captains will be eligible for incentive pay for the following certifications:
1. Advanced $100.00 per month
2. Master’s $150.00 per month
Fire Battalion Chiefs will be eligible for incentive pay for the following certifications:
1. Master’s $150.00 per month
(b) Patrol Officers are eligible for educational incentive pay as follows:
1. Assoc. degree or 60 hours $ 50.00 per month
2. Bachelor’s degree $100.00 per month
Police Lieutenants and Sergeants are eligible for educational incentive pay as follows:
1. Bachelor’s degree $100.00 per month
In addition to the above, Patrol Officers are eligible for certification pay incentive according to the
TCLEOSE certification held:
1. Intermediate $50.00 per month
2. Advanced $100.00 per month
Police Lieutenants and Sergeants are eligible for certification pay incentive according to the following:
1. Advanced $100.00 per month
8. MASTER POLICE OFFICER:
The Master Police Officer designation is discontinued as of 10/01/00. Any Police Officer who carries the
Master Police Officer designation as of 10/01/00 will continue to hold the designation until such time he/she
no longer meets the qualifications set forth below. Any Officer who loses the designation will not be
eligible to regain it. The designation will continue to carry a fifty dollar ($50) per month assignment pay.
The qualifications for this designation are as follows:
a. Must have been with the University Park Police Department for five (5) years or with the UP
Police Department for two (2) years and hold an Advanced TCLEOSE Certification;
b. Must maintain a performance evaluation that “Meets Expectations” for the past two years;
c. Must not have had any preventable accidents within the last eighteen (18) months;
d. Must not have had any suspensions within two (2) years, any written reprimands within one (1)
year, or any oral reprimands within the past six (6) months;
e. Must complete Field Training Officer School and must qualify and perform as a Field Training
Officer;
f. Upon obtaining the Master Police Officer designation, the officer must successfully complete both
basic supervision and intermediate traffic accident training;
g. Must demonstrate proficiency with service weapons; and
h. Must complete one Criminal Investigation school.
9. OVERTIME PAY:
Overtime pay will be applied as described in Administrative Order PRS-4.
10. APPLICATION OF PAY PLAN:
The pay plan, as outlined above, applies only to regular full-time employees (except for overtime
provisions).
11. APPROVAL OF CHANGES IN CLASSIFICATION:
The city manager shall have authority to approve all changes in classification; however, the number of
classification changes subject to his/her approval shall not exceed 10% of total employees during the fiscal
year.
12. INTERPRETATION:
From time to time, it may be necessary to interpret the pay plan for its applicability to certain unforeseen
circumstances. The city manager may issue an administrative order interpreting the pay plan for specific
circumstances; however, all such interpretation may be appealed to the City Council within fifteen (15)
days.
SECTION II
This ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage as the law and charter in such cases
provide, provided that the pay plan to be given effect hereby shall take effect on October 1, 2012.
DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of University Park, Texas, on the 4th day of September,
2012.
APPROVED:
___________________________________
MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
______________________________ ___________________________________
CITY ATTORNEY (RLD/12-02-09/40795) CITY SECRETARY
AGENDAMEMO
(9/4/2012AGENDA)
TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil
FROM:KentR.Austin,DirectorofFinance
SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onanordinanceupdatingTMRSservicecredits
BACKGROUND:
SeeagendaitemonFY2013proposedbudgetfinalpresentationandattachedmemofromDirectorof
HumanResourcesLuanneHanford.
RECOMMENDATION:
ApprovetheordinanceupdatingTMRSservicecreditsandapprovingaCOLA(costofliving
adjustment)forcurrentretirees.
ATTACHMENTS:
MemofromHRDirectorLuanneHanford
OrdinanceadoptingTMRSUSCandCOLA
Memorandum
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Luanne Hanford, Director of Human Resources
Date: 8/30/2012
Re: TMRS Updating Service Credits/COLA Ordinance for FY2013
With this memo, I am submitting an ordinance to adopt Updated Service Credits (USC) at 100% and a
Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) of 70% for city retirees in the Texas Municipal Retirement
System (TMRS).
Updating service credits takes into consideration an employee’s salary changes and any plan changes
adopted by the city over time and assumes those increases and changes have been in effect throughout
the employee’s career. Updating Service Credits is designed to help career members’ benefits
maintain their value.
The proposed retiree COLA will increase the retirees’ benefits by 70% of the increase in the
Consumer Price Index since the last time the COLA was adopted. The City last adopted USC and
retiree COLA effective January 1, 2009. A retiree COLA cannot be adopted without adopting
Updated Service Credits.
In 2012, the City’s TMRS contribution rate dropped from 13.10% to 7.50%. However, the City chose
to contribute 10% to “pay ahead.” Paying more than the required contribution rate, along with
changes made by TMRS in calculating contribution rates, has resulted in a negative unfunded
actuarial liability (i.e., an actuarial asset) for the city of about $2.9 million and a funded ratio of
103.2%.
If the city adopts USC and retiree COLA, the unfunded actuarial liability will be negative $462,000
and the Funded Ratio will be 100.7%. The contribution rate will be 8.26%. Without the changes, the
rate would be 6.8%. The proposed budget presumes an 8.26% rate, versus the current 10%.
According to projection results from TMRS, the long-term effect of adopting USC and retiree COLA
is that the City’s contribution rate will remain stable through 2015 and then start to drop with a
projected 8.06% in 2019. The funded ratio is projected to remain above 100% through 2019 unless
other plan changes are adopted.
The Employee Benefits Committee met on August 28, 2012, to review proposed pay and benefit
changes in the FY2013 budget. After consideration and discussion, the committee voted in favor of
recommending adoption of Updated Service Credits and retiree COLA effective January 1, 2013.
The Committee minutes are included with the budget documents. Staff recommends approval of the
ordinance adopting TMRS Updated Service Credits at 100% and Retiree COLA at 70%.
ORDINANCE NO. _______________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING
AND ALLOWING, UNDER THE ACT GOVERNING THE TEXAS MUNICIPAL
RETIREMENT SYSTEM, "UPDATED SERVICE CREDITS” IN SAID SYSTEM FOR
SERVICE PERFORMED BY QUALIFYING MEMBERS OF SUCH SYSTEM WHO
PRESENTLY ARE EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY; PROVIDING FOR INCREASED
PRIOR AND CURRENT SERVICE ANNUITIES FOR RETIREES AND
BENEFICIARIES OF DECEASED RETIREES OF THE CITY; AND ESTABLISHING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE FOR SUCH ACTIONS.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY
PARK, TEXAS:
Section 1. Authorization of Updated Service Credits.
(a) On the terms and conditions set out in Sections 853.401 through 853.403 of Subtitle
G of Title 8, Government Code, as amended (hereinafter referred to as the "TMRS Act"), each
member of the Texas Municipal Retirement System (hereinafter referred to as the "System") who
has current service credit or prior service credit in the System in force and effect on the 1st day
of January of the calendar year preceding such allowance, by reason of service in the
employment of the City of University Park, and on such date had at least 36 months of credited
service with the System, shall be and is hereby allowed "Updated Service Credit" (as that term is
defined in subsection (d) of Section 853.402 of said title) in an amount that is 100% of the "base
Updated Service Credit" of the member (calculated as provided in subsection (c) of Section
853.402 of said title). The Updated Service Credit hereby allowed shall replace any Updated
Service Credit, prior service credit, special prior service credit, or antecedent service credit
previously authorized for part of the same service.
(b) In accordance with the provisions of subsection (d) of Section 853.401 of said
title, the deposits required to be made to the System by employees of the several participating
departments on account of current service shall be calculated from and after the date aforesaid on
the full amount of such person's earnings as an employee of the City.
Section 2. Increase in Retirement Annuities.
(a) On terms and conditions set out in Section 854.203 of Subtitle G of Title 8,
Government Code, as amended, the City hereby elects to allow and to provide for payment of the
increases below stated in monthly benefits payable by the System to retired employees and to
beneficiaries of deceased employees of the City under current service annuities and prior service
annuities arising from service by such employees to this City. An annuity increased under this
Section replaces any annuity or increased annuity previously granted to the same person.
(b) The amount of the annuity increase under this Section is computed as the sum of
the prior service and current service annuities on the effective date of retirement of the person on
whose service the annuities are based, multiplied by 70% of the percentage change in Consumer
Price Index for All Urban Consumers, from December of the year immediately preceding the
effective date of the person's retirement to the December that is 13 months before the effective
date of this Section.
(c) An increase in an annuity that was reduced because of an option selection is
reducible in the same proportion and in the same manner that the original annuity was reduced.
(d) If a computation hereunder does not result in an increase in the amount of an
annuity, the amount of the annuity will not be changed hereby.
(e) The amount by which an increase under this Section exceeds all previously
granted increases to an annuitant is an obligation of this City and of its account in the
municipality accumulation fund of the System.
Section 3 Effective Date. Subject to approval by the Board of Trustees of the System, this
ordinance shall be and become effective on the 1st day of January 2013, as the law and Charter
provide in such cases.
Duly passed and approved by the City Council of the City of University Park, Texas, on
the ________ day of _____________________2012.
ATTEST: APPROVED:
BY: BY:
LIZ SPECTOR, CITY SECRETARY W. RICHARD DAVIS, MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________________
CITY ATTORNEY
(RLD/8-8-12/56840)