Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012.09.04 City Council AgendaCITYOFUNIVERSITYPARK REGULARCITYCOUNCILMEETING LOCATION:CITYHALLCOUNCILCHAMBER AGENDA#2845 SEPTEMBER4,2012 CALLTOORDER:5:00P.M. 4:00-5:00P.M.WORKSESSIONFORAGENDAREVIEW:TheCouncilwillmeetinopenwork sessiontoreceiveagendaitembriefingsfromstaff.Noactionwillbetaken.Council ConferenceRoom,2ndFloor,CityHall. TOSPEAKONANAGENDAITEM AnyonewishingtoaddresstheCouncilonanyitemmustfilloutagreen“RequesttoSpeak”formand returnittotheCitySecretary.WhencalledforwardbytheMayor,beforebeginningtheirremarks,speakers areaskedtogotothepodiumandstatetheirnameandaddressfortherecord. I.CALLTOORDER A.INVOCATION:CityManagerBobLivingston B.PLEDGEOFALLEGIANCE:CityManagerBobLivingston/BoyScouts C.INTRODUCTIONOFCOUNCIL:MayorW.RichardDavis D.INTRODUCTIONOFSTAFF:CityManagerBobLivingston II.CONSENTAGENDA A.CONSIDERANDACT:onrequestfromSMUtotemporarilycloseHillcrestAve. fromUniversityBlvd.toMockingbirdLn.duringtheirHomecomingparade B.CONSIDERANDACT:onarequestbySMUKappaAlphaThetaSororitytoconduct 5kraceoncertaincitystreets C.CONSIDERANDACT:onordinanceamendingFY2012budget D.CONSIDERANDACT:onthepurchaseofreplacementequipmentforbackup dispatchcenter E.CONSIDERANDACT:onaproposalfromR.L.GoodsonConsultingEngineersto developacomprehensivestormwaterdrainagemapreport F.CONSIDERANDACT:onaproposalfromFreese&Nicholstoconducthydraulic modelingoftheUniversityPark-HighlandParksharedsanitarysewertrunkmain G.CONSIDERANDACT:onaresolutionapprovinganinterlocalagreementwithDallas CountyforparticipationintheirHouseholdHazardousWasteprogram H.CONSIDERANDACT:onminutesoftheAugust28,2012CityCouncilMeeting III.MAINAGENDA A.CONSIDERANDACT:onarequestbytheParkCitiesYMCAtoamendPlanned DevelopmentDistrictPD-12,todemolishtheexistingstructureandredevelopa3.72 acretractmoreorless,withanew65,000sq.ft.facilityandabelowgradeparking garage. B.DISCUSS:WaltHumannrequestforimprovementsalongthesouthboundN.Central Expresswayfrontage C.CONSIDERANDACT:onapprovalofaproposalfromEnerGovSolutions,LLCto provideCommunityDevelopmentSoftwareandImplementationServices D.CONSIDERANDACT:onfundingmethodfortheCollegeScholarshipProgram E.PRESENTATION:ofproposedFY2013Budget-FinalPresentation F.CONSIDERANDACT:onapprovalofanordinanceadoptingtheFY2013budget G.CONSIDERANDACT:onapprovalofanordinancelevyingthe2012propertytax H.CONSIDERANDACT:onordinanceadoptingFY2013payplan I.CONSIDERANDACT:onanordinanceupdatingTMRSservicecredits IV.PUBLICCOMMENTS AnyonewishingtoaddressanitemnotontheAgendashoulddosoatthistime.Pleasebe advisedthatundertheTexasOpenMeetingsAct,theCouncilcannotdiscussoractatthis meetingonamatterthatisnotlistedontheAgenda.However,inresponsetoaninquiry,a Councilmembermayrespondwithastatementofspecificfactualinformationora recitationofexistingpolicy.ItistheCouncil’spolicytorequestthatcitizensnotaddress itemsthatarecurrentlyscheduledforafutureagendaorpublichearing.Instead,theCouncil requeststhatcitizensattendthatspecificmeetingtoexpresstheiropinions,orcommentto theCouncilbye-mailatCity-Council@uptexas.orgorletter addressedtotheMayorand Councilat3800UniversityBlvd.,UniversityPark,Texas75205.Otherquestionsorprivate commentsfortheCityCouncilorStaffshouldbedirectedtothatindividualimmediately followingthemeeting. AsauthorizedbySection551.071(2)oftheTexasGovernmentCode,thismeetingmaybeconvened intoClosedExecutiveSessionforthepurposeofseekingconfidentiallegaladvicefromtheCity AttorneyonanyAgendaitemslistedherein. AGENDAMEMO (9/4/2012AGENDA) TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil FROM:GaryW.Adams,ChiefofPolice SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onrequestfromSMUtotemporarilycloseHillcrestAve. fromUniversityBlvd.toMockingbirdLn.duringtheirHomecomingparade BACKGROUND: TheUniversityParkPoliceDepartmentreceivedaPublicAssemblyapplicationfromSuzanne MasseyofSouthernMethodistUniversityrequestingHillcrestAve.beclosedtoallthroughtraffic fromUniversityBlvd.toMockingbirdLn.fortheirhomecomingparadeSaturday,October27,2012, from10a.m.until12:30p.m. TheCouncilapprovedthesamerequestlastyearforSMU'scentennialhomecomingparadeandthere werenoreportedissuesassociatedwiththestreetclosure.AsSMU'scentennialcelebrationswill continuethrough2015,theUniversityplanstoextendtheircommunityoutreachbyinviting surroundingneighborhoodresidentstoattendtheparade,andplanstoasknewgroupsto participate.SMUintendsforthehomecomingparadetocontinuetobeacommunityeventinthe upcomingyears. RECOMMENDATION: StaffrecommendsapprovalofthisrequestprovidedtherequirementsoutlinedbytheUniversityPark DepartmentofPublicWorksandtheUniversityParkPoliceDepartmentarefollowed. ATTACHMENTS: SMUHomecoming2012PublicAssemblyPermitApp SMUHomecoming2012ParadeRoute SMUHomecoming2012Letter AGENDAMEMO (9/4/2012AGENDA) TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil FROM:GaryW.Adams,ChiefofPolice SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onarequestbySMUKappaAlphaThetaSororityto conduct5kraceoncertaincitystreets BACKGROUND: TheSMUKappaAlphaThetaSororityisconductinga5Kraceandone-mileFunRuntoraisefunds fortheDallasCourtAppointedSpecialAdvocates(CASA),alocalnon-profitorganizationproviding volunteerswhoarevoicesforabusedchildrenincourt. TheproposedrouteissituatedprimarilyonthecampusofSouthernMethodistUniversity,butdoes includecertainresidentialstreetsthroughUniversityPark.TheFunRunisplannedtostartat7:30 a.m.andthe5Kraceisplannedtostartat8:00a.m.onSaturday,October27th.Theentire eventisanticipatedtoendby9:30a.m.Theyhopetohave200-300participantsregisteredto participateinthisevent. ThePoliceDepartmenthasapprovedtherouteandduetothetimeofday,doesnotanticipateany trafficrelatedissues. RECOMMENDATION: Staffrecommendsapprovaloftherequesttousecertaincitystreetsduringthisrun. ATTACHMENTS: SMUThetaRaceRequestLetter SMUThetaRaceRoute Jordan Bowles SMU Theta 5K Chair August 14, 2012 To whom this may concern, This document contains the details of the SMU Theta 6th Annual 5K Race. Proceeds go to our national philanthropy CASA, Court Appointed Special Advocates. Judges appoint Dallas CASA volunteers to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children, helping these children have safe, permanent homes as quickly as possible. Dallas CASA exists so that abused and neglected children in protective care have the chance to become successful adults. With the help of caring advocates, the cycle of abuse and neglect will be broken. The 1 Mile Fun Run begins at 7:30 AM and the 5K starts at 8:30 AM. Most of the routes will be on campus, as seen in the map. The 5K route is the same as last year’s, which was made by Racing Systems/Run On. The 1 Mile Fun Run route has been included as well. Run On is the company that helps us time the race and register participants each year. The race sign up link just became active, so we do not have any runners that have signed up yet, but we hope to have 200 to 300 runners. We will be hiring SMU police and the entire sorority will be manning the race, including set up, passing out water at various places along the race route, and helping to make everything run smoothly. On the next page is a breakdown of the timing of the race, as well as the additional information that I have mentioned. Warm Regards, Jordan Bowles jbowles@smu.edu 919.244.7022 Day of Race Plan 6:40 AM: All Girls Arrive At The House 6:50 AM: Start Set Up In Front Of Moody Coliseum 7:00 AM: Vendors And Police Arrive 7:15 AM: All Food And Sign Ins Ready; Sign Ins Begin 7:20 AM: Girls In Their Places On The Route 7:30 AM: 1 Mile Fun Run Begins 8:00 AM: 5K Run Begins 8:55 AM: Awards Begin, If Not Earlier 9:10 AM: Clean Up Begins 9:30 AM: Everything In Front Of Moody Coliseum Is Clean; Vendors Have Left; Event Is Complete More Information • The race sign up just became active; No runners have signed up yet • All proceeds/money raised will be donated to Dallas CASA (Court Appointed Special Advocates) • Route made by Racing Systems/Run On; Same route as last year o Route is mostly on SMU’s campus • Will be hiring SMU police to work the event; Have contacted them but have not heard back yet • All Theta members will be present to man the race • Contact: Jordan Bowles Theta 5K Chair jbowles@smu.edu 919.244.7022 FO R D ST A D I U M TR A C K MOODY SMU THETA RUN COURSE NOT TO SCALE CROSS STREETS NOT SHOWN MARK COURSE WITH CONES START / FINISH ON BRICK PEDESTRIAN PORTION OF AIRLINE. 4TH POLE S. OF THE S. EDGE OF MOODY. ALSO ONE POLE PAST HYDRANT ON THE E. SIDE OF AIRLINE. WESTMINSTER START ON BRICK PEDESTRIAN PORTION OF AIRLINE. SOUTH, TURNING RIGHT (WEST) AROUND THE NORTH OF FORD STADIUM. SOUTH ON OWNBY DRIVE, (WEST SIDE OF STADIUM) TO SCHLEGEL. WEST ON SCHLEGEL TO BISHOP. NORTH IN NORTHBOUND LANE OF BISHOP RIGHT (EAST) ON BINKLEY. BINKELY TO OWNBY. NORTH (LEFT) ON OWNBY. OWNBY TO DYER. RIGHT (EAST) ON DYER TO AIRLINE. LEFT (NORTH) ON AIRLINE TO UNIVERSITY. RIGHT (EAST) ON UNIVERSITY TO DURHAM. LEFT (NORTH) ON DURHAM. DURHAM TO WESTMINSTER. RIGHT (EAST) ON WESTMINSTER. RIGHT (SOUTH) ON BOEDECKER TO DANIEL. RIGHT (WEST) ON DANIEL. DANIEL TO DURHAM. LEFT (SOUTH) ON DURHAM TO UNIVERISTY. RIGHT ON UNIVERISTY TO AIRLINE. RETURN TO FINISH USING THE SAME PATH AS THE OUTBOUND. MILE 1 - ON NORTHBOUND AIRLINE, AT AIRLINE & UNIVERSITY INTERSECTION MILE 2 - ON SOUTHBOUND DURHAM, AT DURHAM & DANIEL INTERSECTION MILE 3 - ON PEDESTRIAN AREA OF N. FORD STADIUM, EVEN WITH 2ND, (EASTERMOST) STADIUM GATE NO. 4 BI S H O P BO E D E C K E R DU R H A M DANIEL OW N B Y ²DYE R SCHLEGEL UNIVERSITY BINKLEY AI R L I N E AI R L I N E N W E S 1 2 3 AGENDAMEMO (9/4/2012AGENDA) TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil FROM:KentR.Austin,DirectorofFinance SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onordinanceamendingFY2012budget BACKGROUND: TheSeptember4,2012,CityCouncilmeetingagendaincludesanordinanceamendingtheFY2012 (currentyear)budgetby$54,560intheGeneralFund.Thisisthesecondbudgetamendmentof FY2012;thefirst,datedNovember15,2011,approvedthecarryforwardofencumbrances(open purchaseorders)fromFY2011. TheproposednewamendmentwouldincreaseGeneralFundexpendituresby$54,560forthe followingitems: 1.CommunityDevelopmentDepartment--ProfessionalServicesaccount:$10,000topayfor transcriptionofBOAChaseBankhearingandformerBuildingOfficialKeithSchmidtcontract services. 2.EngineeringDepartment--RegularEarningsandFICA/Medicareaccounts:$6900topayfor summerintern. 3.EngineeringDepartment--ProfessionalServicesaccount:$13,000topayforoutsidetraffic engineerreviewofYMCAtrafficimpactanalysis. 4.FacilitiesMaintenanceDepartment--RemodelingProjectsaccount:$24,660topayfor installationcostsofCRAC(ComputerRoomAirConditioning)equipment. TheincreaseinexpenditureswouldbefundedbyuseoftheGeneralFundfundbalance,whichtotaled $6,368,312asofAugust29,2012.TheattachedpageshowstheimpactofbothFY2012budget amendmentsontherelevantfundsanddepartments. RECOMMENDATION: ApprovetheordinanceamendingtheFY2012budget. ATTACHMENTS: FY2012budgetamendmentno.2summarybyfundanddept OrdinanceamendingFY2012budget CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS FY2012 BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 2 BY FUND AND DEPARTMENT 9/4/2012 Fund / Org Unit / Department FY2012 Adopted Budget Budget Amendment 1: 11/15/2011 Budget Amendment 2: 9/4/2012 FY2012 Amended Budget GENERAL FUND Revenues 01-11 REVENUES $26,758,000 $0 $0$26,758,000 Total Revenues $26,758,000 $0 $0$26,758,000 Expenditures 01-02 EXECUTIVE $1,187,135 $6,000 $0 $1,193,135 01-03 FINANCE 1,059,604 0 0 1,059,604 01-04 HUMAN RESOURCES 363,849 1,500 0 365,349 01-05 INFORMATION SERVICES 996,662142,269 0 1,138,931 01-10 COURT 331,720 0 0 331,720 01-19 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1,016,899 12,200 10,000 1,039,099 01-20 ENGINEERING 744,212 67,960 19,900 832,072 01-25 TRAFFIC 848,934 82,454 0 931,388 01-35 FACILITY MAINTENANCE 755,293258,319 24,660 1,038,272 01-40 FIRE 4,860,342 87,734 0 4,948,076 01-50 POLICE 6,666,922 30,709 0 6,697,631 01-70 PARKS 2,834,510 22,253 0 2,856,763 01-75 SWIMMING POOL 269,583 0 0 269,583 01-80 STREETS 1,756,234 0 0 1,756,234 01-85 TRANSFERS 3,032,187 0 03,032,187 Total Expenditures $26,724,086$711,398$54,560$27,490,044 General Fund Surplus/(Deficit)$33,914 ($711,398)($54,560)($732,044) UTILITY FUND Revenues 02-11 REVENUES $13,445,004 $0 $0$13,445,004 Total Revenues 13,445,004$ $0 $0$13,445,004 Expenditures 02-21 UTILITY OFFICE $7,882,997 $0 $0 $7,882,997 02-22 UTILITIES 3,266,306189,397 0 $3,455,703 02-23 STORM WATER 90,450 65,000 0 $155,450 02-85 TRANSFERS 2,195,415 0 0$2,195,415 Total Expenditures $13,435,168$254,397 $0$13,689,565 Utility Fund Surplus/(Deficit)$9,836 ($254,397)$0 ($244,561) SANITATION FUND Revenues 04-11 REVENUES $3,070,451 $0 $0$3,070,451 Total Revenues $3,070,451 $0 $0$3,070,451 Expenditures 04-60 SANITATION $2,868,476$18,131 $0$2,886,607 Total Expenditures $2,868,476$18,131 $0$2,886,607 Sanitation Fund Surplus/(Deficit)$201,975 ($18,131)$0$183,844 TOTAL REVENUES $43,273,455 $0 $0$43,273,455 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 43,027,730$983,926$54,560$44,066,216 TOTAL SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)$245,725 ($983,926)($54,560)($792,761) C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\Agenda.2556.1.Ordinance 2 amending FY2012 budget 09042012.docx 12:57 PM 08/31/12 ORDINANCE NO. ______ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS, AMENDING THE 2011-2012 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET, ORDINANCE NO. 11-20, TO APPROPRIATE $54,560 FROM THE GENERAL FUND UNRESERVED FUND BALANCE BY INCREASING EXPENDITURES $54,560; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of University Park has determined that it is in the public interest to amend Ordinance No. 11-20 to transfer funds from unreserved fund balance of the General Fund into specific accounts; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 11-20, the 2011-2012 fiscal year budget ordinance of the City of University Park, Texas, be, and the same is hereby, amended to appropriate unreserved fund balances of $54,560 from the general fund by increasing expenditures $54,560 in the specific accounts listed on Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made part hereof for all purposes, and such expenditures are herby authorized and made a part of the 2011-2012 fiscal year budget of the City. SECTION 2. This ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage, as the law and Charter in such cases provide. DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of University Park, Texas, on the 4th day of September, 2012. APPROVED: ____________________________________ W. RICHARD DAVIS, MAYOR ATTEST: C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\Agenda.2556.1.Ordinance 2 amending FY2012 budget 09042012.docx 12:57 PM 08/31/12 ____________________________________ ELIZABETH SPECTOR, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM: ________________________________ CITY ATTORNEY C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\Agenda.2556.1.Ordinance 2 amending FY2012 budget 09042012.docx 12:57 PM 08/31/12 ACCOUNT NUMBERACCOUNT DESCRIPTIONAMOUNT DESCRIPTION GENERAL FUND REVENUES 1. TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUES -$ GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1.01-19-3060Professional services 10,000 Transcription service (BOA Chase Bank) and Keith Schmidt TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT10,000 ENGINEERING 2.01-20-1001Regular earnings 6,400Summer engineering intern 3.01-20-1110FICA/Medicare 500Summer engineering intern 4.01-20-3060Professional services 13,000Traffic impact analysis study--proposed YMCA expansion TOTAL ENGINEERING 19,900 FACILITY MAINTENANCE 5.01-35-9950Remodeling projects 24,660Completion of CRAC units install (computer room) TOTAL FACILITY MAINTENANCE 24,660 TOTAL GEN. FUND EXPENDITURES54,560$ FUND BALANCE INCREASE/(DECREASE)(54,560)$ EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS FY2012 BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 2 9/4/2012 AGENDAMEMO (9/4/2012AGENDA) TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil FROM:KenIrvin,Sr.NetworkAdministrator SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onthepurchaseofreplacementequipmentforbackup dispatchcenter BACKGROUND: InMarchandApril2007,theCitypurchasedequipmenttosupportthebackupdispatchcenter andPoliceDepartmentoperationsatthePeekServiceCenter.Thepurposeofthisfacilitywasboth tohousethesecriticaloperationswhileCityHallwasremodeledandtoserveasabackupdispatch centerintheeventofamajoremergency.Thedispatchcenteriscomprisedoftwoconsoles containingfivecomputerseach,anadditionaldisplaycomputerforsecurity,mapping,orother situationalawarenessmaterial,andbackup911andradiosystems. Muchofthisequipmenthasatenyearorgreaterlifespan.Some,however,hasafiveyearlifespan andnowneedstobereplaced.Theitemsneedingreplacementare:1)elevendesktopcomputersand theirsupportingLCDmonitors,2)NICERecordingSystemHardwareandSoftware,and3)Console furniturecabling. RECOMMENDATION: Replacingtheseitemswillallowustocontinueprovidingexcellentservicetothecommunityevenin theeventofafailureattheCityHallcenter.Staffreccomendsreplacementoftheindicated equipment. FUNDINGSOURCE: AllitemsproposedforreplacementaredefinedintheCapitalProjectsbudgetasprojectnumber 14300.Thecostandintendedpurchasingvehicleforeachitemisoutlinedbelow: 1.11DesktopComputers-$15,075.70-DellComputersSoleSource 2.NICELoggerApplianceandSoftware-$42,386.00-TXDIRContractNumberDIRSDD1736 3.CablingofConsoleFurniture-$770.00-MediaManagementProfessionalServices AGENDAMEMO (9/4/2012AGENDA) TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil FROM:GeneR.Smallwood,P.E.;DirectorofPublicWorks SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onaproposalfromR.L.GoodsonConsultingEngineersto developacomprehensivestormwaterdrainagemapreport BACKGROUND: TheCitydevelopedaStormwaterManagementPlanin2008and,asrequired,submittedacopytothe TexasCommissiononEnvironmentQuality(TCEQ).TheSMPidentifiesnumerousoperational controlmeasuresandmanagementpracticesthatwillhaveapositiveimpactonwaterqualityasit dischargesintodrainageinlets,stormsewers,andwatercoursesintheCity.TheCityfilesanannual reportwiththeTCEQtoaffirmthateachofthesixtyrequiredtasksdetailedintheSMPhasbeen accomplished. Oneofthekeytasksyettobecompletedisthedevelopmentofadetailedstormwatercollection systemmap.RLGhasdonetwopriorphasesofthemapping,leavingthelast,andbyfarthelargest sectiontobedoneviathisproposal.Thecostfortheworkisdetailedat$200,500. FundingfortheproposedworkisavailablefromtheUtilityFund(StormwaterBudget). RECOMMENDATION: StaffrecommendsCityCouncilapprovaloftheR.L.Goodsonproposalintheamountof$200,500for developingacomprehensivestormwatersystemmappingreport,subjectdeletionofthe"limitof liability"clause,andauthorizetheCityManagertoexecuteacontractforthework. FUNDINGSOURCE: UTILITYFUND(Stormwater) ProfessionalServices02.23.3060 ATTACHMENTS: RLGProposal AGENDAMEMO (9/4/2012AGENDA) TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil FROM:GeneR.Smallwood,P.E.;DirectorofPublicWorks SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onaproposalfromFreese&Nicholstoconducthydraulic modelingoftheUniversityPark-HighlandParksharedsanitarysewertrunkmain BACKGROUND: A30-inchsanitarysewertrunkmainrunssouthfromMcFarlinthroughtheDallasCountryCluband HighlandParktoapointalongTurtleCreek,nearWycliff,whereitconnectstoDallasWaterUtilities' collectionsystem.ThesewerprovidesserviceformostofUniversityParkandHighlandPark. Followingseveralyearsofdiscussionsregardingownershipandoperationofthe30-inchsanitary sewer,theCityCouncilapprovedaninterlocalagreement(ILA)withHighlandParkon12-15-2010. Oneoftheprovisionsofthecontractrequiresthatthetwocitiesworktowardsolutionstoreduce infiltration-inflowandeliminateoverflows,particularlythosethathaveoccurredduringsignificant rainfalleventsneartheintersectionofLakesideandArmstrong.Tothatend,aproposalwassolicited fromFreeseandNichols,engineeringconsultants,todevelopahydraulicmodelofthe30-inchmain. Thisanalysisshouldprovideinsightintowhatcapitalimprovementsand/ormaintenance activitiesmaybenecessaryinaccomplishingthegoalsidentifiedintheILA. Acopyoftheproposalisattachedtothismemo.The$65,000infeesfortheengineeringservicesis proposedtobesharedbytheCityandtheTown.Logistically,staffisrecommendingthatUniversity ParkenterintothecontractandHighlandParkwillreimbursetheCityforitsshareoftheengineering costs. RECOMMENDATION: StaffrecommendsCityCouncilapprovaloftheFreese&Nicholsproposalintheamountof$65,000 (withHighlandParkpayingfiftypercent),andauthorizetheCityManagertoexecuteacontractfor thework.FundsfortheprojectareidentifiedintheCapitalProjectsFund. FUNDINGSOURCE: CAPITALPROJECTSFUND AcctNo42.42.4430 ProjectNo49270.2100 ATTACHMENTS: F-NPROPOSAL 30-InchSewerMap August 15, 2012 Bud Smallwood, P.E. Meran Dadgostar, P.E., R.S. Public Works Director Town Engineer City of University Park, Texas Town of Highland Park, Texas 3800 University Blvd. 4300 MacArthur Ave., Suite 265B University Park, Texas 75205 Highland Park, Texas 75209 Re: Agreement for Hydraulic Analysis for 30-Inch Turtle Creek Sewer Interceptor Dear Mr. Smallwood and Mr. Dadgostar: In response to our meeting with you on July 18, 2012 regarding the issues the City of University Park and the Town of Highland Park are experiencing with the 30-inch Turtle Creek sewer interceptor, we are pleased to submit this proposal for providing professional engineering services to the City of University Park and the Town of Highland Park. We understand that this is a joint project for the City of University Park and the Town of Highland Park, but that our contract will be with the City of University Park. Specifically, we propose to provide the following Scope of Services: SCOPE OF SERVICES Project Intent: The City of University Park and the Town of Highland Park share a 30-inch sanitary sewer interceptor in Turtle Creek. The interceptor and associated siphons were originally constructed in the 1930s and flow from this interceptor is received by Dallas Water Utilities (DWU) through a meter south of Wycliff Avenue. The interceptor has historically experienced sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) immediately upstream of the siphon on Armstrong Avenue during rain events. This scope of work will consist of a review of permanent flow meter data (for both the City and Town) and drainage basin contributing areas to develop wastewater flow assumptions for the interceptor. This analysis will consist of developing projected flows for each individual wastewater line in Highland Park and University Park that contributes to the 30-inch Turtle Creek interceptor by defining the contributing sub- basin area and calculating resulting wastewater flows. This scope of services will also consist of development of an InfoWorks CS sanitary sewer model of the Turtle Creek interceptor and contributing sub-basins from McFarlin Avenue to the DWU Point of Entry. Recent survey data collected by C&P Engineering will be utilized for model development. The model will be calibrated to a historical wet weather event, develop a hydraulic grade profile for existing conditions, and used to evaluate improvement alternatives to reduce the potential for SSOs. The assumptions, analysis, and recommendations will be summarized in a technical report. Page 2 Our proposed schedule for this effort is 90 calendar days from Notice to Proceed. Every effort will be made to complete these services in a timely manner, as we know the importance of this project to the City and the Town. We believe that the meetings outlined in the Scope of Services will be necessary to ensure adequate communication and buy-in from all stakeholders. However, we have structured this proposal as a not-to-exceed contract so that if, during the course of the project, it is determined that one or more of the progress meetings are not necessary, the City and Town will not be charged for these meetings. In addition, meetings will be attended only by necessary FNI personnel and will be productive in nature consisting of necessary project interaction, presentation and discussion of results, input from all stakeholders, decision-making, and determination of a path forward. 1. Project Kick-Off Meeting: Freese and Nichols, Inc. (FNI) will meet with the Town of Highland Park (Town) and the City of University Park (City) to review project goals, scope, team, schedule, and data requirements. 2. Data Collection and Review: FNI will compile and review information from the Town and City related to the 30-inch Turtle Creek sewer line including GIS files, drawings, flow data, CCTV data, previous reports, survey data collected by C&P Engineering, and any other pertinent data. 3. Review Permanent Flow Metering Data and Develop Wastewater Flows: FNI will review web- based wastewater flow data for the four permanent flow meters to develop typical average dry weather and peak wet weather wastewater flows. FNI will use available data to identify contributing areas and quantify infiltration and inflow allowances and flows from wastewater lines that flow into the 30-inch turtle Creek interceptor. FNI will develop weekday and weekend diurnal patterns. 4. Construct Model of 30-inch line and Contributing Sub-basins: FNI will construct a hydraulic model of the 30-inch Turtle Creek sewer line in InfoWorks CS software (by Innovyze) using GIS mapping, survey data, as-built drawings, schematics, and other available data. Flow from contributing sub-basins and entry points along the 30-inch line will be represented in the model. Wastewater lines, siphons, manholes, and other structures will be included in the model. FNI will perform a one-day site visit to view the configuration and layout of critical structures on the 30- inch Turtle Creek sewer line. 5. Coordination meeting with Dallas Water Utilities (DWU): FNI will attend one coordination meeting with DWU to collect data and discuss assumptions related to the HGL/flows at the DWU connection point and planned downstream improvements. 6. Calibrate InfoWorks CS Model to Existing Conditions: FNI will calibrate the InfoWorks CS model to a selected recent rainfall event using on-line flow metering and rainfall gage data by comparing model output to recorded values for flow, depth, and velocity. 7. Progress Meeting – Wastewater Flows and Model Calibration: FNI will meet with the Town and City to review wastewater flows and model calibration. 8. Hydraulic Analysis for Existing Dry Weather and Peak Wet Weather Flow Conditions: FNI will run the InfoWorks model under existing dry weather and wet weather flow conditions for a 5-year 6-hour design storm to develop HGL profiles of the 30-inch Turtle Creek sewer interceptor. FNI will review model output to identify areas where the HGL may be higher than the ground elevation, indicating a potential capacity restriction. FNI will develop an HGL profile graph and mapping. Page 3 9. Evaluate Improvement Alternatives: FNI will utilize the InfoWorks CS model to evaluate up to three (3) separate improvement alternatives to address problem areas and improve the hydraulic capacity of the 30-inch Turtle Creek interceptor. Improvement alternatives will provide the necessary capacity to handle flows from a 5-year 6-hour storm event with no overflows. The improvement alternative will be evaluated with and without planned downstream improvements in DWU’s system. 10. Progress Meeting – Hydraulic Analysis and Improvement Alternatives: FNI will meet with the Town and City to review the results of the hydraulic modeling and improvement alternatives analysis. 11. Develop Cost Estimates: FNI will develop planning level cost estimates for the three improvements alternatives including construction, contingency, and engineering/survey costs. 12. Develop Draft Report: FNI will develop a draft report that summarizes the assumptions, methodology, results, and recommendation of the hydraulic analysis. FNI will submit the draft report in electronic PDF format. 13. Progress Meeting – Review Draft Report: FNI will meet with the Town and City to review the draft report and solicit comments from Town and City staff. 14. Develop Final Report: FNI will incorporate Town and City comments and finalize the report. FNI will deliver an electronic PDF copy and ten (10) hard copies of the report. ADDITIONAL SERVICES: Additional Services to be performed by FNI, if authorized by OWNER, which are not included in the above described basic services, shall be computed based on a negotiated fee. TIME OF COMPLETION FNI is authorized to commence work on the Project upon execution of this Agreement and agrees to complete the services within 90 calendar days of Notice to Proceed. If FNI’s services are delayed through no fault of FNI, FNI shall be entitled to equitable adjustment of compensation and FNI shall be entitled to adjust contract schedule consistent with the number of days of delay. RESPONSIBILITIES OF CLIENT Client will perform the following in a timely manner so as not to delay the services of FNI: A. Designate in writing a person to act as Client’s representative with respect to the services to be rendered under this Agreement. Such person shall have contract authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define Client’s policies and decisions with respect to FNI’s services for the Project. B. Assist FNI by placing at FNI’s disposal all available information pertinent to the Project including previous reports and any other data relative to the Project. Page 4 C. Arrange for access to and make all provisions for FNI to enter upon public and private property as required for FNI to perform services under this Agreement. D. Examine all studies, reports, sketches, drawings, specifications, proposals and other documents presented by FNI, obtain advice of an attorney, insurance counselor and other consultants as Client deems appropriate for such examination and render in writing decisions pertaining thereto within a reasonable time so as not to delay the services of FNI. E. Provide such accounting, independent cost estimating and insurance counseling services as may be required for the Project, such legal services as Client may require or FNI may reasonably request with regard to legal issues pertaining to the Project. DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES FNI and CLIENT designate the following representatives: CITY’s Designated Representative: Bud Smallwood, P.E., 3800 University Blvd, University Park, Texas 75205; Phone 214-987-5400; email bsmallwood@uptexas.org CITY’s Accounting Representative: FNI’s Designated Representative: Scott Cole, P.E., 1701 N. Market St., Suite 500, Dallas, Texas, 75202; Phone 817-735-7255; Fax 817-735-7492; email sac@freese.com FNI’s Accounting Representative: Jana Collier, 4055 International Plaza, Ste. 200, Fort Worth, Texas 76109; Phone 817-735-7354; Fax 817-735-7496; email jvc@freese.com COMPENSATION FNI proposes to furnish our services as described herein in accordance with Attachment CO, “Compensation”. The total fee for Basic Services shall be computed on the basis of Attachment CO but shall be a not-to-exceed fee of: • Project Kick-Off Meeting (Task 1): $ 1,300 • Data Collection and Review (Task 2): $ 3,200 • Review Metering Data and Develop Flows (Task 3): $ 5,700 • Construct Model (Task 4): $ 9,400 • Meeting with Dallas Water Utilities (DWU) (Task 5): $ 1,300 • Calibrate InfoWorks CS Model (Task 6): $ 6,800 • Progress Meeting –Flows and Calibration (Task 7): $ 1,300 • Hydraulic Analysis (Task 8): $ 7,900 • Evaluate Improvement Alternatives (Task 9): $11,000 • Progress Meeting –Improvement Alternatives (Task 10): $ 1,300 • Develop Cost Estimates (Task 11): $ 4,400 • Develop Draft Report (Task 12): $ 5,900 • Progress Meeting – Review Draft Report (Task 13): $ 1,300 • Develop Final Report (Task 14): $ 4,200 • Total Fee Not to Exceed: $65,000 Page 5 If FNI sees the Scope of Services changing so that additional services are needed, FNI will notify the City’s representative for approval before proceeding. Additional services shall be computed based on the Schedule of Charges found in Attachment CO. Payment of the services shall be due and payable upon submission of a statement for services. Statements for services shall not be submitted more frequently than monthly. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT We propose to furnish our services as described herein in accordance with Attachment TC, "Terms and Conditions of Agreement". We appreciate this opportunity to submit this proposal. If additional information or clarification is desired, please do not hesitate to contact us. If you are in agreement with the services described above and wish for us to proceed with this assignment, please sign below and return one copy of the agreement for our files. L:\Resources\cbs\U\University Park\Hyland Park Hydraulic Analysis Turtle Crk\Let Agree 08-15-12 Yours very truly, Approved: FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC. City of University Park Brian Coltharp, P.E. Principal By: _________ Name:________________________________ Print or Type Scott Cole, P.E. Principal Title: _________ Date: ________________________________ ATTACHMENT CO Min Max Position Min Max 163.98 412.27 3D VISUALIZATION COORDINATOR 141.53 174.83 186.77 295.88 O&G ENGINEER VI 216.36 288.00 256.97 271.48 O&G ENGINEER V 199.12 209.52 227.81 255.26 O&G ENGINEER II 101.22 136.95 168.41 231.34 O&G ENGINEER - TRANSITION 172.73 176.87 143.42 188.50 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST VII 182.92 231.88 121.86 167.26 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST VI 179.14 179.14 109.04 135.79 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST V 126.62 161.79 102.02 116.68 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST IV 111.06 156.20 97.74 111.10 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST III 80.35 126.65 181.24 223.89 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST II 84.10 91.66 165.46 172.44 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST I 66.89 82.08 129.42 147.46 ARCHITECT VI 162.83 190.91 108.81 134.42 ARCHITECT V 133.30 172.51 91.72 113.30 ARCHITECT IV 131.62 134.64 86.02 106.26 ARCHITECT III 111.72 134.72 172.86 213.53 ARCHITECT II 90.82 112.19 141.92 175.32 ARCHITECT I 74.48 92.01 136.51 168.63 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT V 126.75 156.57 101.62 131.51 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT INTERN II 89.10 91.19 94.40 116.61 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT INTERN I 62.84 81.32 87.91 108.60 PLANNER VII 194.00 239.65 178.61 220.64 PLANNER VI 177.48 215.64 116.25 143.60 PLANNER V 133.16 172.32 134.88 174.56 PLANNER IV 113.72 123.59 107.46 115.42 PLANNER III 94.18 104.47 68.02 84.03 PLANNER II 77.74 100.60 156.28 216.58 PLANNER I 71.05 87.77 122.15 166.90 HYDROLOGIST VI 164.63 203.36 101.52 148.68 HYDROLOGIST V 116.43 143.83 89.28 128.88 HYDROLOGIST IV 115.52 124.02 79.63 97.81 HYDROLOGIST III 93.45 120.94 DOCUMENT CONTROL SPECIALIST II 99.94 102.49 HYDROLOGIST II 85.10 105.12 57.74 62.75 SENIOR GEOLOGIST 115.70 142.92 144.00 190.37 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER VI 186.26 230.09 129.42 161.71 RIGHT OF WAY AGENT 86.05 106.29 112.73 139.26 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT COORDINATOR 61.38 121.93 149.08 158.98 WORD PROCESSING/SECRETARIAL 55.48 106.38 107.28 148.64 OPERATIONS ANALYST 113.44 152.75 91.26 127.30 CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR 82.33 84.56 75.35 94.21 PROJECT CONTROL SPECIALIST 75.96 81.72 64.01 89.89 INFORMATION SERVICES CLERK III 51.41 63.50 55.60 71.96 INFORMATION SERVICES CLERK II 40.54 52.92 126.68 135.94 INFORMATION SERVICES CLERK I 40.32 40.32 110.02 132.59 CO-OP 28.80 71.14 82.15 108.14 71.78 76.28 55.55 71.89 RATES FOR INHOUSE SERVICES Computer and CAD Calcomp Plotter Print Shop PC CAD Stations $10.00 per hr.Bond $2.50 per plot Color Copies & Printing $0.50 per single side copy Other $5.00 per plot $1.00 per double side copy Color $5.75 per plot Black & White Copies & Printing $0.10 per single side copy Testing Apparatus $0.20 per double side copy Density Meter $700.00 per month Gas Detection $20.00 per test Binding $5.75 per book FNI ggp0360:3/7/2012 OWNER GIS ANALYST V GIS ANALYST IV GIS ANALYST III GIS ANALYST II GIS ANALYST I The ranges and individual salaries will be adjusted annually. PRINICIPAL GROUP MANAGER ENGINEER VIII ENGINEER VI ENGINEER V PROGRAM MANAGER I ELECTRICAL ENGINEER II ELECTRICAL ENGINEER I ELECTRICAL ENGINEER VI ELECTRICAL ENGINEER III MECHANICAL ENGINEER III MECHANICAL ENGINEER II MECHANICAL ENGINEER IV MECHANICAL ENGINEER I PROGRAM MANAGER II Schedule of Charges: ENGINEER IV ENGINEER III ELECTRICAL ENGINEER IV COMPENSATION ENGINEER VII ENGINEER II ENGINEER I ELECTRICAL ENGINEER V TECHNICIAN I Position TECHNICIAN II TECHNICIAN IV TECHNICIAN III SR DESIGNER DESIGNER II DESIGNER I SR CADD DESIGNER CADD DESIGNER CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT ADMIN III CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT ADMIN II CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT ADMIN I DOCUMENT CONTROL SPECIALIST MECHANICAL ENGINEER VI MECHANICAL ENGINEER V CONSTRUCTION MANAGER V CONSTRUCTION MANAGER IV CONSTRUCTION MANAGER III CONSTRUCTION MANAGER II CONSTRUCTION MANAGER I OTHER DIRECT EXPENSES: Other direct expenses are reimbursed at actual cost times a multiplier of 1.15. They include outside printing and reproduction expense, communication expense, travel, transportation and subsistence away from the FNI office and other miscellaneous expenses directly related to the work, including costs of laboratory analysis, test, and other work required to be done by independent persons other than staff members. For Resident Representative services performed by non-FNI employees and CAD services performed In-house by non-FNI employees where FNI provides workspace and equipment to perform such services, these services will be billed at cost times a multiplier of 2.0. This markup approximates the cost to FNI if an FNI employee was performing the same or similar services. Not to Exceed: The total fee for Basic Services in Attachment SC shall be computed on the basis of the Schedule of Charges, but shall not exceed Sixty Five Thousand Dollars ($65,000.00). If FNI sees the Scope of Services changing so that Additional Services are needed, including but not limited to those services described as Additional Services in Attachment SC, FNI will notify OWNER for OWNER's approval before proceeding. Additional Services shall be computed based on the Schedule of Charges. Page 1of 2 FNI__________ OWNER__________ 10-25-07 ATTACHMENT TC TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT 1. DEFINITIONS: The term Owner as used herein refers to the City of University Park, Texas . The term FNI as used herein refers to Freese and Nichols, Inc., its employees and agents; also its subcontractors and their employees and agents. As used herein, Services refers to the professional services performed by Freese and Nichols pursuant to the AGREEMENT. 2. CHANGES: Owner, without invalidating the AGREEMENT, may order changes within the general scope of the WORK required by the AGREEMENT by altering, adding to and/or deducting from the WORK to be performed. If any change under this clause causes an increase or decrease in FNI's cost of, or the time required for, the performance of any part of the Services under the AGREEMENT, an equitable adjustment will be made by mutual agreement and the AGREEMENT modified in writing accordingly. 3. TERMINATION: The obligation to provide services under this AGREEMENT may be terminated by either party upon ten days' written notice. In the event of termination, FNI will be paid for all services rendered and reimbursable expenses incurred to the date of termination and, in addition, all reimbursable expenses directly attributable to termination. 4. CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES: In no event shall FNI or its subcontractors be liable in contract, tort, strict liability, warranty, or otherwise for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages, such as loss of product, loss of use of the equipment or system, loss of anticipated profits or revenue, non-operation or increased expense of operation or other equipment or systems. 5. INFORMATION FURNISHED BY OWNER: Owner will assist FNI by placing at FNI's disposal all available information pertinent to the Project including previous reports and any other data relative to design or construction of the Project. FNI shall have no liability for defects or negligence in the Services attributable to FNI's reliance upon or use of data, design criteria, drawings, specifications or other information furnished by Owner and Owner agrees to indemnify and hold FNI harmless from any and all claims and judgments, and all losses, costs and expenses arising therefrom. FNI shall disclose to Owner, prior to use thereof, defects or omissions in the data, design criteria, drawings, specifications or other information furnished by Owner to FNI that FNI may reasonably discover in its review and inspection thereof. 6. INSURANCE: FNI shall provide to Owner certificates of insurance which shall contain the following minimum coverage (All limits in thousands): Commercial General Liability Workers' Compensation General Aggregate $2,000 Each Accident $500 Automobile Liability (Any Auto) Professional Liability CSL $1,000 $3,000 Annual Aggregate 7. SUBCONTRACTS: If, for any reason, at any time during the progress of providing Services, Owner determines that any subcontractor for FNI is incompetent or undesirable, Owner will notify FNI accordingly and FNI shall take immediate steps for cancellation of such subcontract. Subletting by subcontractors shall be subject to the same regulations. Nothing contained in the AGREEMENT shall create any contractual relation between any subcontractor and Owner. 8. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS: All drawings, reports data and other project information developed in the execution of the Services provided under this AGREEMENT shall be the property of the Owner upon payment of FNI's fees for services. FNI may retain copies for record purposes. Owner agrees such documents are not intended or represented to be suitable for reuse by Owner or others. Any reuse by Owner or by those who obtained said documents from Owner without written verification or adaptation by FNI will be at Owner's sole risk and without liability or legal exposure to FNI, or to FNI's independent associates or consultants, and Owner shall indemnify and hold harmless FNI and FNI's independent associates and consultants from all claims, damages, losses and expenses including attorneys' fees arising out of or resulting therefrom. Any such verification or adaptation will entitle FNI to further reasonable compensation. FNI may reuse all drawings, report data and other project information in the execution of the Services provided under this AGREEMENT in FNI's other activities. Any reuse by FNI will be at FNI's sole risk and without liability or legal exposure to Owner, and FNI shall indemnify and hold harmless Owner from all claims, damages, losses and expenses including attorneys' fees arising out of or resulting therefrom. Page 2of 2 FNI__________ OWNER__________ 9. POLLUTANTS AND HAZARDOUS WASTES: It is understood and agreed that FNI has neither created nor contributed to the creation or existence of any hazardous, radioactive, toxic, irritant, pollutant, or otherwise dangerous substance or condition at the site, if any, and its compensation hereunder is in no way commensurate with the potential risk of injury or loss that may be caused by exposures to such substances or conditions. The parties agree that in performing the Services required by this AGREEMENT, FNI does not take possession or control of the subject site, but acts as an invitee in performing the services, and is not therefore responsible for the existence of any pollutant present on or migrating from the site. Further, FNI shall have no responsibility for any pollutant during clean-up, transportation, storage or disposal activities. 10. OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS: FNI will furnish an opinion of probable project development cost based on present day cost, but does not guarantee the accuracy of such estimates. Opinions of probable cost, financial evaluations, feasibility studies, economic analyses of alternate solutions and utilitarian considerations of operations and maintenance costs prepared by FNI hereunder will be made on the basis of FNI’s experience and qualifications and represent FNI's judgment as an experienced and qualified design professional. It is recognized, however, that FNI does not have control over the cost of labor, material, equipment or services furnished by others or over market conditions or contractors' methods of determining their prices. 11. CONSTRUCTION REPRESENTATION: If required by the AGREEMENT, FNI will furnish Construction Representation according to the defined scope for these services. FNI will observe the progress and the quality of work to determine in general if the work is proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents. In performing these services, FNI will endeavor to protect Owner against defects and deficiencies in the work of Contractors; FNI will report any observed deficiencies to Owner, however, it is understood that FNI does not guarantee the Contractor's performance, nor is FNI responsible for the supervision of the Contractor's operation and employees. FNI shall not be responsible for the means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction selected by the Contractor, or the safety precautions and programs incident to the work of the Contractor. FNI shall not be responsible for the acts or omissions of any person (except his own employees or agent) at the Project site or otherwise performing any of the work of the Project. If Owner designates a person to serve in the capacity of Resident Project Representative who is not a FNI's employee or FNI's agent, the duties, responsibilities and limitations of authority of such Resident Project Representative(s) will be set forth in writing and made a part of this AGREEMENT before the Construction Phase of the Project begins. 12. PAYMENT: Progress payments may be requested by FNI based on the amount of services completed. Payment for the services of FNI shall be due and payable upon submission of a statement for services to OWNER and in acceptance of the services as satisfactory by the OWNER. Statements for services shall not be submitted more frequently than monthly. Any applicable new taxes imposed upon services, expenses, and charges by any governmental body after the execution of this AGREEMENT will be added to FNI's compensation. If OWNER fails to make any payment due FNI for services and expenses within thirty (30) days after receipt of FNI's statement for services therefore, the amounts due FNI will be increased at the rate of one percent (1%) per month from said thirtieth (30th) day, and, in addition, FNI may, after giving seven (7) days' written notice to OWNER, suspend services under this AGREEMENT until FNI has been paid in full, all amounts due for services, expenses and charges. 13. ARBITRATION: No arbitration arising out of, or relating to, this AGREEMENT involving one party to this AGREEMENT may include the other party to this AGREEMENT without their approval. 14. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNMENTS: OWNER and FNI each are hereby bound and the partners, successors, executors, administrators and legal representatives of OWNER and FNI are hereby bound to the other party to this AGREEMENT and to the partners, successors, executors, administrators and legal representatives (and said assigns) of such other party, in respect of all covenants, agreements and obligations of this AGREEMENT. Neither OWNER nor FNI shall assign, sublet or transfer any rights under or interest in (including, but without limitation, moneys that may become due or moneys that are due) this AGREEMENT without the written consent of the other, except to the extent that any assignment, subletting or transfer is mandated by law or the effect of this limitation may be restricted by law. Unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment, no assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any duty or responsibility under this AGREEMENT. Nothing contained in this paragraph shall prevent FNI from employing such independent associates and consultants as FNI may deem appropriate to assist in the performance of services hereunder. 15. PURCHASE ORDERS: If a Purchase Order is used to authorize FNI's Services, only the terms, conditions/instructions typed on the face of the Purchase Order shall apply to this AGREEMENT. Should there be any conflict between the Purchase Order and the terms of this AGREEMENT, then this AGREEMENT shall prevail and shall be determinative of the conflict. AGENDAMEMO (9/4/2012AGENDA) TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil FROM:JacobSpeer,AssistantDirectorofPublicWorks SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onaresolutionapprovinganinterlocalagreementwith DallasCountyforparticipationintheirHouseholdHazardousWasteprogram BACKGROUND: TheDallasCountyHouseholdHazardousWasteDisposalProgramwasinitiatedin1994.Citizensof UniversityParkhaveusedtheHomeChemicalCollectionCenter(locatedat11232PlanoRoad)to disposeoftheirpaint,herbicides,pesticides,etc.UniversityPark’sannualcontributiontotheprogram isfundedasa$25,000expenditurefromtheproposedSanitationDivisionFY2013Budget. RECOMMENDATION: StaffrecommendsCityCouncilapprovalofaresolutionauthorizingtheCityManagertoexecutean InterlocalAgreementwithDallasCountytocoordinateaCountywideHouseholdHazardousWaste DisposalProgram. FUNDINGSOURCE: Sanitationfundoperatingbudget ATTACHMENTS: ProposedResolutionandILA RESOLUTION NO. _________________ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS, APPROVING A HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH DALLAS COUNTY AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the County of Dallas coordinates and implements a Household Hazardous Waste Network for the collection and disposal of household hazardous waste; and, WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to join the Network to provide the City’s residents with a means of disposal of such waste; now therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the “Household Hazardous Waste Interlocal Agreement 2013”, a true copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and made part hereof for all purposes, is accepted and approved in all respects by the City Council to provide disposal facilities for the City’s residents for Household Hazardous Waste. That the City Manager is authorized and directed to execute such Agreement on behalf of the City of University Park and to take such other administrative steps as may be necessary to participate in the Network. SECTION 2. This Resolution shall take effect immediately from and after its passage, and it is accordingly so resolved. DULY PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS, on the ____ day of ____________ 2012. APPROVED: _______________________________ W. RICHARD DAVIS, MAYOR ATTEST: ________________________________________ ELIZABETH SPECTOR, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM: ________________________________ CITY ATTORNEY (RLD/08-29-12; 57089) EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT A AGENDAMEMO (9/4/2012AGENDA) TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil FROM:LizSpector SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onminutesoftheAugust28,2012CityCouncilMeeting BACKGROUND: MinutesoftheAugust28,2012CityCouncilMeetingareincludedfortheCouncil'sapproval. ATTACHMENTS: Aug28,2012CCMtgMin MINUTES AGENDA #2844 CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS COUNCIL CHAMBER – CITY HALL TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 2012, 5:00 P.M. 4:00 - 5:00 P.M. WORK SESSION FOR AGENDA REVIEW: THE COUNCIL MET IN OPEN WORK SESSION TO RECEIVE AGENDA ITEM BRIEFINGS FROM STAFF. NO BUSINESS WAS CONDUCTED. 2ND FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM, CITY HALL. The City Council Meeting was called into session at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at City Hall. Present were Councilmember Stewart, Mayor Pro Tem Clark, Mayor Davis, Councilmember Moore, and Councilmember Begert. Also in attendance were City Manager Livingston, and City Attorney Dillard. Mayor Davis asked the Boy Scouts in attendance to come to the front and assist in leading the Pledge of Allegiance. The scouts included: Nathan Smith, Troop 70, Communications merit badge; Michael Cochran, Troop 70, Communications merit badge; and, Nick Chapman, Troop 518, Communications merit badge. Staff in attendance included: Assistant Director of Public Works Jacob Speer, Chief Planning Official Harry Persaud, Director of Finance Kent Austin, Assistant to the City Manager George Ertle, Director of Human Resources Luanne Hanford, Director of Parks Gerry Bradley, City Secretary Liz Spector, Director of Public Works Bud Smallwood, Director of Community Development Robbie Corder, Fire Chief Randy Howell, Director of Information Services Jim Criswell, and, Community Information Officer Steve Mace. Councilmember Stewart made a motion to approve the Consent Agenda. Mayor Pro Tem Clark seconded, and the motion carried unanimously. I. CALL TO ORDER A. INVOCATION: Assistant to the City Manager George Ertle B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Assistant to the City Manager George Ertle / Boy Scouts C. INTRODUCTION OF COUNCIL: Mayor W. Richard Davis D. INTRODUCTION OF STAFF: City Manager Bob Livingston II. CONSENT AGENDA A. CONSIDER AND ACT: on minutes of the August 21, 2012 City Council Meeting III. MAIN AGENDA A. REPORT: receive a peer review report of the YMCA Traffic Impact Analysis Mayor Davis reminded the audience that the City retained Mr. Kevin St. Jacques, a traffic engineer with the firm Freese & Nichols, to perform a review of the TIA submitted with the YMCA’s PD amendment application. He asked Mr. St. Jacques to present his findings and he requested Mr. St. Jacques concentrate his summary on facets of his report where he noted differences from the DeShazo Tang TIA. Mayor Davis stated that following Mr. St. Jacques presentation and time for any questions the Council may have, he will move to the public hearing and provide time for rebuttal and summarization of the YMCA PD amendment request. Mayor Davis said all parties will be given the chance to address the Council. Mr. Kevin St. Jacques addressed the Council. He presented his assessment of the DeShazo Tang traffic and parking study. He noted the DeShazo Tang study followed generally accepted principles in the preparation of their report. Mr. St. Jacques said he reviewed how the original study was done, using standards of parking and traffic impact assessment. Mr. St. Jacques also noted the report was prepared using certain assumptions because the project is a future project. Mr. St. Jacques explained how he used current operations as a baseline with forward projections related to operations changes. He stated he used 2010 program year data to calculate the forward projections. He said 2010 had the highest usage numbers, and he said that data provided a good baseline. He explained how he calculated 1.25 as the number of vehicles to be parked per child on a soccer team. He mentioned that the YMCA's TIA used 1.0 per child. He stated he calculated afternoon peak to be the highest while the morning peak was identified as higher in the DeShazo study. He also mentioned that the DeShazo study used data collected on a Thursday, but he said usage counts are usually higher on Mondays through Wednesdays, so he feels the usage counts taken by DeShazo were somewhat lower than they should be. Mr. St. Jacques also stated he determined there would be little negative traffic impact on Preston Road from the proposed redevelopment of the YMCA. He said estimates from the North Central Council of Governments show Preston Road traffic to be declining, due to improvements on other nearby major thoroughfares. Mr. St. Jacques detailed some differences he calculated in regards to the number of parking spaces that will be required. He said he recommended the addition of 3 spaces for potential increased administrative personnel, 5 more spaces for the Rise School to allow for longer drop-off times, 36 additional spaces to provide for the gymnasium due to a higher vehicle to team member ratio, 10 more spaces allocated for the increase in the multipurpose spaces, and 5 additional spaces attributed to the increase in adult fitness/spin class sizes. He said with those additions, he calculated the YMCA parking garage will need to increase the number of provided parking spaces to 330. Mr. St. Jacques stated the YMCA should do what it can to ensure patrons park in the garage by not having much external parking available. He said the City could institute a Residential Parking District or designate certain areas as No Parking. He then discussed the offset alignment of Normandy as it crosses Preston. He stated the road could be realigned into a more four-legged intersection for better flow or the traffic signal light could be changed to allow each side of Normandy to have it's own cycle. He also said pedestrian crosswalks need to be enhanced for better safety. He also stated a southbound left turn lane from Preston onto Normandy will need to be installed by the City. He said this will improve traffic flow into the parking garage. Mr. St. Jacques said some residents stated there should be more than one access point to garage. He said he determined that even at peak usage times, one ingress/egress will be able to handle the activity. He did mention that there should be an easy way for garage users to access the game fields to encourage patrons to park there rather than the street. Mr. St. Jacques stated that the YMCA sets the programs for its customers and therefore wants to provide for their comfort and safety. He said any parking limitations will only constrain their operations. He said the City can control on-street parking and street operations. Mayor Davis asked if anyone had questions for Mr. St. Jacques. Mr. Peter Rogers, 6200 St. Andrews, stated a newly constructed YMCA will attract more people to their neighborhood. He also expressed concern about the amount of vehicles that will be parked on the residential streets during construction. Mr. St. Jacques said he recommended the garage driveway opening be no closer than 129 ft. from Preston Road to reduce interference with westbound Normandy traffic waiting at the Preston Road light. He said this distance was the 95th percentile of queuing traffic at this intersection. Mr. Duncan Fulton said he noted a possible overcount of 14 parking spaces due to supplemental information provided about the Rise School. He said this will revise the theoretical maximum required parking from 330 down to 316. Mr. St. Jacques agreed. Mr. Tom Black, 4117 Shenandoah, asked Mr. St. Jacques about using 8 players in his calculations. He stated that many soccer teams have more than 8 members. He said this would bring more vehicles. Mr. St. Jacques said if this was true, then the 1.25 percentage would be reduced so there would not be much impact on the number of vehicles. There were no more questions for Mr. St. Jacques and Mayor Davis opened the public hearing. Mr. Duncan Fulton, architect for the YMCA project, addressed the Council. He said much B. PUBLIC HEARING: Continue a public hearing and provide direction to staff on a request by the Park Cities YMCA to amend Planned Development District PD-12, to demolish the existing structure and redevelop a 3.72 acre tract more or less, with a 65,000 sq. ft. facility and below-grade parking garage. of the commentary from thosed opposed to the project is based on opinion with little factual information. He stated the YMCA has provided much hard data to assist the Council with their decision. He said the data are substantiated, relevant facts. Mr. Fulton said the review of the TIA ordered by the City showed that the TIA was done properly and generated proper results. He stated the YMCA is a good fit for the City. He said the building is designed to be constructed within the City’s Zoning Ordinance FAR standards as are other comparable facilities in the City. He said the YMCA has been in this location for 50 years, is entitled to its uses and has no plans to change it current uses. Mr. Fulton stated they want to enhance the youth programs and will make good decisions on how to match the building with programs provided for residents. Mr. Fulton said the building’s current design causes the "busyness" in the neighborhood and if the Council approves the new plan, the "busyness" will be eased. He said the evidence shows the YMCA’s proposed plan will not be too big and will not negatively impact traffic density. Mr. Fulton said the YMCA has made 26 or 27 significant compromises requested by the neighbors and they did so with no judgements on their validity. He stated the neighbors requested the building be redesigned to better fit the neighborhood and the YMCA agreed. He said the YMCA needs to justify the $20 to $25 million capital campaign with a project that will meet their foreseeable needs. He said the additional parking will improve the existing shortfall with no material impact on traffic. He said five traffic studies come to the same conclusion. Mr. Fulton said the YMCA has received a tremendous amount of support from local residents. He said the need is clear and asked the Council to approve this request. Mayor Pro Tem Clark said largest component of the renovation is the new gymnasium. He asked if this was a new need. Mr. Fulton said the YMCA is the largest youth sports provider in community and the only provider with no gym. He said it is a long-standing need. Mayor Pro Tem Clark asked if the gym will have grandstands and Mr. Fulton said it will not. He stated there will be the opportunity for parents to stand around and watch the games, but no grandstands like a high school gym. Councilmember Begert asked if the YMCA is prepared to give up some of their property to align Normandy. Mr. Fulton said this is another aspect of a compromise the YMCA is willing to make. He stated the Y will agree to this if that is what the Council decides. He said in prior discussions with City staff, it was discussed that the Y could grant an easement to the City for use in realignment. A resident asked from the audience if the YMCA planned to charge to use the parking garage. Mr. Fulton said there will be no fees for patrons. Councilmember Begert asked how the YMCA will ease resident concerns related to Y patrons parking in or blocking their driveways. Mr. Greg Pappas, Executive Director of the Park Cities YMCA, said the staff does patrol the area for parking issues. He said they walk the perimeter of the building to monitor parking concerns, but during outdoor sports seasons it is more difficult to control. He said the YMCA will do whatever they can to be a good neighbor and help ensure parking concerns are addressed. Mrs. Gail Schoellkopf, 4006 Shenandoah, addressed the Council. She summarized her concerns. She said the proposed size is too large. She stated the facility will dominate the neighborhood and threaten property values. She said the YMCA was built with gifts, many from neighbors, but the neighborhood is now suffering. She said the parking and traffic problems created by the YMCA should no longer be permitted to continue. She said the YMCA can correct these problems by revising their programming and moving some programs to other locations. She said there are alternatives for these programs at other facilities. Mr. Tom Black addressed the Council. He stated the neighbors have presented many perspectives and he believes the primary root cause of the opposition to the project is what the YMCA has stated is non-negotiable. Mr. Black said the size drives most of the neighborhood concerns. He said the facility will be too tall and bulky and is out of proportion to the neighborhood. Mr. Black said the allocation of available parking will not support the proposed new uses of the YMCA and will leave the neighborhood worse off. He said the YMCA began as a youth facility and over time, added adult fitness facilities. He said he realizes this is a complicated issue but he urged the Council to deny the request to amend the PD. He said the Council has an obligation to find the best long-term outcome for the City. Dr. James Huth addressed the Council. He said the addition of the Rise School to the YMCA does not make sense. He said the main traffic problems occur during early morning hours and evening hours, not during the day. He mentioned that the YMCA is not managing their facility in a neighborhood-friendly manner. Ms. Kitty Holleman, a resident of University Park, addressed the Council. She suggested the Council relocate the YMCA to University Blvd. and the North Dallas Tollway and move the tennis courts to the current YMCA location. Mr. Gill Brown, 4007 Normandy, asked the Council to hold the YMCA accountable for the daily activities in the neighborhood. He asked the Council to get compromises in writing and to help build trust with the neighbors. Mr. Brown also urged the Council to request the YMCA to construct the parking garage to be accessed from Preston. He said the creation of a residential parking district is very important. Mr. Bill Bolding, 4101 Stanhope, stated he resides within the 200 ft. buffer zone. He asked whether anyone had presented data showing the potential impact of the project on the appraised values of nearby homes. Mr. Peter Rogers asked the Council to ensure that the construction workers not be allowed to park in the neighborhoods. He stated 100 to 150 vehicles daily will be parked on city streets during construction if the request is approved. Councilmember Moore said parking is a self-regulator. She asked Director of Public Works Bud Smallwood if the City can implement a residential parking district knowing that there will not be enough parking for the YMCA. Mr. Smallwood said yes. There were no further requests to speak and Mayor Davis closed the public hearing. Mayor Davis said the Council will reconsider this issue during the September 4 Council Meeting. He stated no further input will be taken from the public unless there is a new major development. He stated the Council hopes to have an answer for this request at that meeting. City Manager Bob Livingston addressed the Council regarding the proposed FY2013 budget. He said this was the second public hearing on the proposed budget. There was no one present who wished to discuss the budget and Councilmember Begert closed the public hearing. No one wished to address the Council from the floor and Mayor Davis adjourned the meeting. Considered and approved this 4th day of September, 2012. ___________________________ W. Richard Davis, Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________ Elizabeth Spector, City Secretary C. PUBLIC HEARING: on proposed FY2013 budget and tax rate IV. ITEMS FROM THE FLOOR AGENDAMEMO (9/4/2012AGENDA) TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil FROM:HarryPersaud,ChiefPlanningOfficial SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onarequestbytheParkCitiesYMCAtoamendPlanned DevelopmentDistrictPD-12,todemolishtheexistingstructureandredevelopa3.72 acretractmoreorless,withanew65,000sq.ft.facilityandabelowgradeparking garage. BACKGROUND: CityCouncil convenedapublichearingonthisitematitsregularmeetingonAugust7, 2012.AtaspecialcalledmeetingonAugust28,2012,Councilreceivedareportfrom FreeseandNicholsregardingareviewoftheparkingandtrafficstudysubmittedbythe PCYMCA.Afterthereportwaspresentedanddiscussed,Councilcontinuedthepublic hearingontherequesttoamendPD-12.Thepublichearingwassubsequentlyclosed. Atthisstageinthezoningprocess,Councilmayproceedtoconsiderthezoningrequest and/orprovidedirectiontostaffwithregardtothedraftingofanordinanceapprovingthe request.Sincemorethan20%ofthepropertieswithin200feetofthesubjectsiteare opposedtotheproposedzoningamendment,approvalofthisrequestwillrequireavote ofatleast4membersoftheCityCouncil. RECOMMENDATION: PlanningandZoningCommissionconsideredthisitematitsregularmeetingonJune12,2012and voted4-1torecommendapprovalsubjecttospecialconditionsattached. ATTACHMENTS: DraftPDConditions Existingandproposedusesbyfloorarea P&Zrecommendedsiteplan 1 DRAFT PD CONDITIONS: (07-17-12) Items in bold text represent details which have been agreed upon between some residents and the YMCA. A. Permitted Land Use: PC YMCA Primary and accessory uses associated with the functions and activities of the YMCA to include, but not limited to the following: a. Pre-K and daycare classrooms -7,189 sq. ft. limited to a maximum enrollment of 60 b. Gymnasium -10,481 sq. ft. c. Indoor pools -13,049 sq. ft. d. Adult fitness - 7,087 sq. ft. e. Multi purpose, racquetball etc. - 7,571 sq. ft. f. Administration offices - 4,609 sq. ft. g. Locker rooms, restrooms, Lobby - 15,014 sq. ft. h. Outdoor playground located on the north side of the subject site. B. Maximum Building Size: The maximum gross floor area of the proposed development shall not exceed 65,000 sq. ft. C. Building Setbacks: All building setbacks measured from the property line and shown on the conceptual site plan as follows: a. Minimum front yard setback along Preston Road: 45 ft b. Side yard setback on north side along Shenandoah: 147 ft c. Side yard setback on south side along Normandy: 49 ft d. Rear yard setback along the Connerly frontage: 18 ft e. A screened service area for dumpsters and outdoor storage is shown attached to the southeast corner of the building. The primary building is setback 34 feet at that location. f. Permanent foundation structural supports at underground garage may not extend past property line and any temporary supports shall comply with all City codes and policies in effect at the time of construction. Drawings prepared by a State of Texas licensed professional engineer, providing all design calculations being employed to resist lateral soil loads as specified in Section 1610 of the 2009 IBC shall be submitted with the plans for permit. 2 D. Building Standards: a. Two stories above grade with parking garage below grade providing for a minimum of 300 parking spaces b. Maximum building height of 35 feet except that the Gymnasium may be constructed with a maximum height not to exceed 44 feet c. Maximum plate line height 31 feet d. Building materials: Insulated glass with dark annodized aluminum frame; prefinished wood siding; natural stone veneer, stucco veneer and standing seam metal roof. e. FAR: 0.443 f. The parking garage shall be located as shown on the conceptual site plan. E. Parking: a. An underground garage with a minimum of 300 parking spaces shall be provided for the proposed development. Carbon monoxide or like sensor(s) will be installed and will regulate the operation of the exhaust fans for the Parking Garage. Noise levels from exhaust fans shall not exceeded 71dB at any property line. At grade spaces serving the drop off lane on Preston shall be a minimum of 23 feet in length. b. Details for the parking garage to include design of parking layout, drive aisle width, parking space dimension, turning radii, access ramps and number of spaces shall be provided with the detailed site plan. Driveway ramp shall comply with Article 3.12 of the City Code of Ordinances. F. Landscape Development Plan: a. Perimeter trees shown on the conceptual site plan shall be evergreen with a minimum of 5” caliper and 9 feet in height at the time of installation. b. Trees along the Normandy frontage in full view of the single family homes shall be installed and maintained prior to the opening and use of the parking garage. c. A perimeter fence will be installed around the playground with limited access through gates located in close proximity to the drop off lane on Preston Road and at the midpoint of the playground on Connerly Drive. d. The detailed landscape development plan will provide details for shrubs and groundcover and include specie, caliper, height and location of all trees. e. All landscaping shall be irrigated and must be in place prior to the issue of a certificate of occupancy. G. Signage: All new signs on the site must be in compliance with the City of University Park sign regulations in effect at the time of the sign permit application. 3 H. Dumpsters: Refuse or trash containers will be located in the Service Area and all trash and recyclable pickups from the containers will be conducted by the City of University Park. The specific location of dumpsters for the proposed development shall be shown on the detailed site plan. The final design and placement of dumpsters is subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works. I. Utilities: The size and location of all water and sewer taps for the proposed development shall be shown on the detailed site plan and shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Public Works prior to the issue of a building permit. J. External Walls: Detailed specs including color and texture of all materials used for external cladding of the building shall be provided with the detailed site plan. K. Sidewalks: A continuous side walk is required around the perimeter of the building. Details to be shown on the detailed site plan. L. External Lighting: Location, mounting height and photometric details for all external light fixtures on the site shall be provided on the detailed site plan. Exterior lighting overflow/spillage shall not exceed five (5) foot candles at the mid-point of any surrounding city street. M. Exhaust Fans: Noise from exhaust fans installed in the parking garage may not exceed current ambient levels of 71 dB at the property line. Noise in excess of this level shall be attenuated. Fans shall be programmed to shut off at the close of business. N. Traffic Study: PC YMCA is required to pay the full cost for a comprehensive traffic study to be conducted approximately 12 months after a certificate of occupancy has been issued for the new facility. The traffic study shall be performed by a consultant selected by the City Council and the YMCA shall pay the cost for any future traffic control measures or studies deemed necessary by the City Council. O. Hours of Operation: Maximum hours of operation of the Facility shall be as follows: Monday through Friday 5:30 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Saturday 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Sunday 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. 4 P. Interior Lighting: Interior lights visible from the exterior will be turned off no later than thirty minutes of operation closing, except in the areas being cleaned, provided that, with the exception of emergency and code-required lighting, interior lighting will be turned off no later than 11:30 p.m and lock-ins held in spaces with blackout shades fully extended. Q. Vehicles Parked in the Service Area: No vehicles taller than the screening wall in the Service Area shown on Exhibit “A”, will be parked overnight. No structures or storage items will erected or placed in the Service Area that are taller than the screening wall. R. Construction standard: The Facility will be constructed in substantial compliance with the conceptual site plan, building elevations and renderings approved by the City Council and referenced Exhibit “A” and Representative Facility Images and Materials (Exhibit “B”) attached hereto, as determined by the Director of Community Development for the City of University Park and shall further comply with all applicable City codes then in effect. S. Service Area: The Service Area will be gated, and the gate will be a metal-framed gate with an exterior face using wood similar to, or the same as, the wood on the Facility, and will have an automatic opener and closer to keep the service gate closed when the Service Area is not in use. T. Parking and Delivery During Construction: Construction activities within the PD will be conducted under City of University Park building and city codes. Parking for construction workers’ vehicles will be located off-site and workers will be transported to and from the construction site, provided that, when the Parking Garage is available for use, it can be used for parking construction workers’ vehicles. All deliveries of construction materials to the construction site will begin no earlier than 9:00 am and will end by 4:00 pm Monday through Saturday. Construction contractor(s) will make reasonable efforts to receive deliveries through the Normandy Avenue/Preston Road intersection entrance, understanding that this might not be possible at varying time during construction. U. Staging and Screening: No residential streets will be used for continuous staging of construction work and or materials. Any significant exterior construction areas shall be fenced to screen the site including a green screening material placed on the fence, maintenance or landscaping work excluded, all in accordance with the city codes. 5 V. Full Time Liaison: The YMCA shall provide a full-time liaison that has authority during to respond to questions and complaints from the nearby citizens during the construction period. A phone number for this contact will be provided to all property owners from the St. Andrews Neighborhood Association (“SANA”) and the West of Preston Neighbors (“WPN”) and posted on the job site where it can be readily found by interested parties. Additional Boilerplate Conditions: Construction Vehicles: No parking of construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted on City streets. If space is available, all parking shall be accommodated on the site. If available space is inadequate, the developer shall provide off-site parking and shuttle workers to the site. Parking of construction vehicles on City streets which are closed for construction must be approved by the Director of Public Works. Construction Hours: Unless written permission is granted by the Director of Public Works, construction work on the site is restricted to Monday through Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Background Checks: Background checks will be performed by the contractors for all construction workers prior to them working on the site. Information relating to background checks will be kept on file by the contractors. A convicted felon or pedophile will be barred from working on the site. Screening Fence: The construction site will be screened with a temporary eight foot (8') screening fence of dark green or black windscreen fabric, or other material approved by the Community Development Director, and installed on a chain link fence. Explosives: No explosives shall be used in the construction operations. Security: The developer shall provide and pay the costs for adequate security and traffic control around the campus for all functions. PARK CITIES YMCA RENOVATION Square Footage Comparison 04.02.12 Functional area Present Program Area (SF)Proposed Facility Net additional Allocation Indoor Outdoor Total Program (Square Feet)Square Feet (as of Date Listed) @ 65,000 SF NON-ACTIVITY SPACE Lobby, Restrooms and circulation areas 4,604 4,604 11,188 6,584 11,773 Men/Womens Locker rooms 2,703 2,703 3,080 377 3,241 Office/administration 2,833 2,833 4,380 1,547 4,609 Sub Total 10,140 - 10,140 18,648 8,508 19,624 ACTIVITY SPACE Pre K/Childwatch area 2,244 2,244 6,830 4,586 7,187 Outside Sportcourt/gymnasium 2,344 2,344 9,960 7,616 10,481 Indoor and outdoor pools 5,800 6,996 12,796 12,400 (396) 13,049 Adult Fitness and spin rooms 5,385 5,385 6,735 1,350 7,087 Hodges Hall/Racquetball/Courtyard/multipurpose space6,472 2,420 8,892 7,195 (1,697) 7,571 Sub Total 19,901 11,760 31,661 43,120 11,459 45,376 Total 30,041 11,760 41,801 61,768 19,967 65,000 Increase as a % of Total Program Area 48%55% P:\2010\10088\g-jurisdictional agencies\[PD-Schedule of Uses PCYMCA-Indoor Outdoor.xlsx]Sheet1 GARAGE ACCESS RAMP DOWN NORMANDY AVENUE SHENANDOAH STREET C O N N E R L Y D R I V E PR E S T O N R O A D 16 SOCCER FIELD 40YDS X 80YDS 5' SIDEWALK PLAYGROUND FENCE RIGHT OUT ONLY LEFT OUT ONLY IN FROM EITHER DIRECTION BUILDING ENTRY SCREENED SERVICE AREA COVERED GARAGE EXIT & VENT PATIO BUILDING ENTRY 4 3 APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF BELOW GRADE GARAGE. MINIMUM 300 CARS REQUIRED. 2 STORY BUILDING MAXIMUM 65,000 CONDITIONED SF ABOVE GRADE MAXIMUM HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED 44 FEET TO THE RIDGELINE. PROPERTY LINE 10' SCREEN WALL ADD ONE NEW DEDICATED TURN LANE. NORMANDY LIGHT TO BE RIGHT ONLY & LEFT ONLY. NO STRAIGHT THROUGH ALLOWED. AS RECOMMENDED BY P&Z AGENDAMEMO (9/4/2012AGENDA) TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil FROM:GeneR.Smallwood,P.E.;DirectorofPublicWorks SUBJECT:DISCUSS:WaltHumannrequestforimprovementsalongthesouthboundN.Central Expresswayfrontage BACKGROUND: Mr.HumannrecentlymetwithstaffregardingpotentialimprovementsalongthesouthboundN. CentralExpresswayfrontage.WiththeopeningoftheGeorgeW.BushPresidentialCenterinApril 2013,hesuggestedthiswouldbeanopportunityfortheCitytomakecertainimprovementsalongthe corridorincluding: *Paintingthescreeningwall *Constructportalstructuresatkeyintersections *Sidewalkreplacement *Securityissues *Landscapeimprovements *LinearParkimprovements(westofwall) Mr.HumannwillattendTuesday'smeetingandmakehispresentationtoCouncil.Therearecurrently nofundsidentifiedintheCity's5-yearCapitalProjectsfund. RECOMMENDATION: StaffsolicitsCityCouncildirectionregardingthisrequestedproject. AGENDAMEMO (9/4/2012AGENDA) TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil FROM:JimCriswell,DirectorofInformationServices SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onapprovalofaproposalfromEnerGovSolutions,LLCto provideCommunityDevelopmentSoftwareandImplementationServices BACKGROUND: SincethecompletionoftheCityHallremodelinthespringof2009,InformationServiceshasbeen systematicallyupgradingtheCity'scoresoftwareapplicationsaspartofastrategicplantomigrateall ofthesupportedcomputingsystemstoaMicrosoftnetworkingplatform.Aspartofthisinitiative,the Court,Finance,HumanResources,UtilityBilling,Police,Fire,andComputer-aidedDispatch Systemshavebeensuccessfullyupgraded.Theremainingprimaryapplicationtobemigratedisthe CommunityDevelopmentSystem. ToensurethatthenewCommunityDevelopmentSystemwillachievethegoalofa10-yearlife, improvedparcelandpermitmanagement,comprehensiveGeographicInformationSystem(GIS) integration,dynamicplanreviewcapability,citizenandcontractoronlineandInteractiveVoice Response(IVR)access,andextensivemobiledevicesupport,aHighTechnologyRequestfor Proposal(RFP)waspublishedinJanuary. TherewereeightcompaniesthatrespondedtotheRFP.Overthepastfewmonths,theCity'snine- memberevaluationteamhasbeenconductinginternalreviewmeetings,checkingreferences,and hostingbothweb-based,andon-sitedemonstrations.Initially,theCitynarrowedthelistofresponders tofourvendorsforweb-baseddemonstrations.Fromthatpoint,twofinalistswerebroughtinforon- sitedemonstrations. RECOMMENDATION: ThereweresixrespondersproposingaviablesolutionfortheCommunityDevelopmentDepartment. TylerTechnologies$221,465 CRW$263,000 NewWorldSystems$315,400 EnerGovSolutions$321,279 MSGovern$402,722 SungardPS$408,755 BecausethisRFPwasforahightechnologypurchaseinaccordancewithSection252.021(b)ofthe TexasLocalGovernmentCode,weconsideredotherfactorsbesidesthepurchasepriceindetermining thebestvaluefortheCity.Eachproposalwasscoredaccordingtothefollowingcriteria: -Initialcostofmodulesforcoreservicesincludingone-timeandrecurringcosts -AssessmentofsoftwaresuitabilitybasedonresponsestoRequirementsMatrix -Assessmentofvendorqualifications,experience,stayingpowerandfinancialstability,including proposedstaffingandabilitytomeetthemilestonedates -Integrationintoexistingtechnologyinfrastructure -Assessmentofsoftwarefeatures,easeofoperatingthesystem,reportwritinggeneration,and designingcustomreports Aftertheextensivereviewprocessoutlinedabove,theEnerGovSystemwasdeterminedtobethebest longtermsolutionfortheCity.InadditiontotherobustCommunityDevelopmentsoftwarefeatures providedwiththeEnerGovSystem,theStaffwasveryimpressedwiththetightintegrationtothe ESRI(EnvironmentalSystemsResearchInstitute)mappingsystem.TheInformationServices DepartmenthasbeenworkingtowardanESRIEnterpriseGISsolutionforthreeyears.Giventhe extensiveuseofCitymapdatabyCommunityDevelopment,thistightintegrationtoGISwillgreatly helpusreachthatgoal.TheaddedvaluetoourGISinitiativewasanunexpectedbenefitofselecting EnerGov. StaffrecommendsapprovaloftheEnerGovSolutionsproposalintheamountof$321,279. FUNDINGSOURCE: ThefundingforthisprojectiscontainedintwoInformationTechnologyCapitalImprovement Projects. Project13120-EnterpriseGISSystemUpgrade-$122,020 Project13400-CommunityDevelopmentSoftwareReplacement-$250,000 ThefundingfortheseprojectshasbeenapprovedbytheCapitalProjectsCommittee. AGENDAMEMO (9/4/2012AGENDA) TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil FROM:SteveMace,CommunityInformationOfficer SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onfundingmethodfortheCollegeScholarshipProgram BACKGROUND: TheCollegeScholarshipProgrambeganin2009withadonationtotheUniversityParkCivic Foundation.Theprogram'ssolepurposeistoawardcollegescholarshipstothechildrenofCity employees.Todate,theefforthasawardedanaverageof15scholarshipsduringthefallandspring semesters.Withtheprogram'soriginalgiftof$60,000soontobeexhausted,acitizencommitteehas studiedvariousoptionstogenerateongoingfunds.Thecommitteebelievesthemosteffectiveoption istoaddavoluntary50¢donationtoeachutilitybilleachmonth. Atthecommittee'sdirection,aquestionconcerningtheprogram'sfundingwasincludedonthe2011 CommunitySurvey.Thosewhorespondedtothequestion(1,024households)supportedavoluntary 50¢monthlydonationbyatwo-to-onemargin.PriortorequestingthattheitemappearonaCity CouncilAgenda,thecommitteedecidedtonotifyeachutilitycustomerbyletterconcerningthe scholarshipprogramandongoingfunding.Providingbackgroundonthescholarshipprogram,the letterdetailedthecommittee'sdesiretofundscholarshipsthroughavoluntary50¢donationviaeach monthlyutilitybill.Theletterwasdeliveredtoallresidentialandcommercialcustomerstheweekof July16,2012.Theletterinformedcustomersthattheycouldopt-outofthevoluntary50¢monthly donationatanypointintimebycontactingtheCity'sUtilityBillingOffice.Todate,19customers havechosentodoso. Cityemployeesarenotinvolvedinanyaspectofthescholarshipselectionprocessordecisions concerningthecurrentorfuturescopeoftheprogram. RECOMMENDATION: StaffseeksdirectionfromtheCouncilontherequesttoincludethevoluntarydonationontheCity monthlyutilitybills. ATTACHMENTS: CollegeScholarshipFundingLetter AGENDAMEMO (9/4/2012AGENDA) TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil FROM:BobLivingston,CityManager SUBJECT:PRESENTATION:ofproposedFY2013Budget-FinalPresentation BACKGROUND: TheproposedFY2013budgethasbeenreviewedandrecommendedbythreeAdvisoryCommittees-- EmployeeBenefits,Finance,andProperty/Casualty/LiabilityInsurance.TheCapitalProjectsReview CommitteereviewedandrecommendedapprovaloftheFY2013capitalbudget(scheduledfor the9/18/2012Councilmeeting)attheirAugust20meeting. TheCityCouncilheldpublichearingsonthebudgetandproposedtaxrateAugust21and28,and staffhaspublishedtherequirednoticesinthelocalnewspaperandCitywebsite.Adoptionofthe budgetoccursbyordinance,asdoesthepropertytaxrate,payplan,andTMRSservicecredit updating. HB3195REQUIREMENTS In2007theTexasLegislatureapprovedHouseBill3195.Thislawrequiresthatbudgetsraisingmore revenuefrompropertytaxesthaninthepreviousyearmustincludeacoverpagewiththefollowing statementin18-pointorlargertype: “Thisbudgetwillraisemoretotalpropertytaxesthanlastyear’sbudgetby$X,andofthat amount,$Yistaxrevenuetoberaisedfromnewpropertyaddedtothetaxrollthisyear.” Thisyear,theproposedtaxratewillraisetotalpropertytaxesby$65,334comparedtotheprioryear, andofthatamount,$193,057istaxrevenuegeneratedbynewpropertyaddedtothetaxrollthisyear. TheCityManager'sFY2013budgetmemocontainstherequiredstatement. RECOMMENDATION: IrecommendthattheCounciltakethefollowingactionstoapprovetheFY2013budgetandrelated items: 1.HoldafinalhearingontheFY2013budget .Attheconclusionofthe hearing,thebudgetisreadyforaction. 2.ApprovetheordinanceadoptingtheFY2013budget.Th etotalbudgetof $44,275,593is2.90%higherthanlastyear’s$43,027,730adopted budget.TheCity’sthreebudgetedfundsincludetheGeneral,Utility,and SanitationFunds. 3.Approvetheordinanceadoptingthetaxyear2012(FY2013)propertytax rateof$0.27845per$100taxablevalue .Theentirerateisdedicatedfor maintenanceandoperations,includingbudgetedamountstobetransferredto thecapitalprojectsfund;thereisnodebtservice.Theeffectivetaxrateis $0.279174—thisistheratethatwouldraiseasmuchpropertytaxrevenueas lastyearwhenappliedagainstpropertiesonthetaxrollinboth years.Consequently,theproposedtaxrateof$0.27845isaneffectivetax decrease. 4.ApprovetheordinanceadoptingtheFY2013salaryplan .Theplan includesa3%market-basedpayincrease,thefirstintwoyears.Totalfull- timeheadcountis243employees,twomorethanlastyear,includingthe additionofthreefull-timelibrarypositions. 5.ApprovetheordinanceupdatingTMRSservicecreditsforcurrent employeesandapprovingapartialCOLA(costoflivingadjustment)for retirees.TheagendamemofromDirectorofHumanResourcesLuanne Hanfordprovidesmoredescriptionofthesechanges.Approvalofthe ordinancewillreducetheCity'sTMRSemployercontributionratefrom10% to8.26%. ATTACHMENTS: FY2013CMPROPOSEDBUDGETPACKAGE FinanceAdvisoryCommittee8/9/2012meetingminutes PCLAdvisoryCommittee8/23/2012meetingminutes EmployeeBenefitsAdvisoryCommittee8/28/2012meetingminutes CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS FY2013 PROPOSED BUDGET October 1, 2012 – September 30, 2013 August 7, 2012 This budget will raise total property taxes versus last year’s budget by $65,334 or 0.42%, and of that amount, $193,057 is tax revenue to be raised from new property added to the tax roll this year. This statement is required by HB 3195 of the 80th Texas Legislature. 1 M E M O  DATE: August 7, 2012 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Bob Livingston, City Manager SUBJECT: Proposed FY2013 budget INTRODUCTION  This memo presents the City Manager’s proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2013 (FY2013, the period October 1, 2012 – September 30, 2013). The proposed FY2013 expenditure budget totals $44,275,593, a 2.90% increase from FY2012. The budget maintains the same City property tax rate as the past two years: 27.845 cents per $100 taxable value. While the overall tax base rose just 0.35%, single-family home values stayed level. The average single-family homeowner will pay one dollar less in City property taxes under the proposed budget. FY2013 marks the first year of the University Park Public Library as a City department, with an initial budget of $600,000. Of this amount, $300,000 will be funded by the UP Friends of the Library. Prior City budgets included library expenditures of $196,555, so the net budget increase is only $103,445. The proposed budget includes a 3% pay raise for City employees, the first in two years. This increase is partly offset by a reduction in the City’s TMRS contribution rate, from 10% to 8.26%. The number of full-time positions totals 243, reflecting the addition of three new Library employees. The table below compares total expenditures for the City’s three budgeted funds--General, Utility, and Sanitation. Three other funds--Capital Projects, Equipment Services, and Self-Insurance--are not included in the formal budget, because their revenues originate from the three budgeted funds. A summary page showing the proposed budget by fund and department follows this memo. . FUND FY2011  ACTUAL  EXPENDS FY2012  ADOPTED  BUDGET FY2013  PROPOSED  BUDGET $ CHANGE % CHANGE GENERAL$27,003,169$26,724,086 $27,261,321 $537,235 2.01% UTILITY$13,716,254$13,435,168 $14,242,469 $807,301 6.01% SANITATION$2,686,568$2,868,476 $2,771,803 ($96,673) ‐3.37% TOTAL$43,405,991$43,027,730 $44,275,593 $1,247,8632.90% 2 As can be seen, the most dramatic change is in the Utility Fund. Water and wastewater rate increases will be needed to keep pace with the 13% higher rate for treated water from the Dallas County Park Cities Municipal Utility District (MUD) and reduced wastewater revenues. City staff is working to select a consultant to perform a comprehensive water and wastewater rate study, with input from the City Council and City advisory committees. The study is expected to be completed by November so that rates can be considered by the City Council before December 31. Consequently, the proposed FY2013 budget shows the likely effect of a rate increase in Utility Fund revenues but does not yet recommend specific rate changes. ADDITIONAL BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS  • Sales tax revenues continue upward, from $3,121,443 in FY2010 to a projected $3,399,321in FY2012. Some of the increase in FY2012 comes from lump-sum sales tax recoveries. The FY2013 budget proposes sales tax revenue of $3,338,000. • Single family home starts continue to increase—for the seven months ended July 31, new SF home permits total 40, versus 34 during the same time last year. Building permit revenue continues to benefit from large SMU and commercial projects. Permit revenues were boosted in FY2011 by the George W. Bush Presidential Center ($1,670,697) and in FY2012 by the Plaza at Preston Center office building and the SMU sophomore commons projects. Permit revenue for the first ten months of FY2012 totaled $2,305,344, compared with a budget of $1,400,000 and last year’s total of $2,846,125. While FY2013 is expected to include revenues from projects like the renovation of SMU’s Moody Coliseum, the proposed revenue budget remains at $1,400,000. • The General, Utility, and Sanitation Fund budgets are balanced, so that proposed expenditures are matched by projected revenues. Again, however, this presumes increases in water and wastewater rates, which are not yet specified in the proposed FY2013 budget. • Direct Alarm monitoring continues to be a bright spot. Actual alarm monitoring revenue has increased from $652,999 in FY2008 to a projected $823,000 in FY2012. The FY2013 budget proposes Direct Alarm revenue of $866,989. • Pay-as-you-go capital project funding of $5.2 million is maintained. Of this amount, $3,032,187 is budgeted in the General Fund (Department 01-85, Transfers) and $2,195,415 in the Utility Fund (Department 02-85, Transfers). These amounts are moved to the Capital Projects Fund in 12 level installments during the fiscal year. A separate FY2013 capital budget will be reviewed by the Capital Projects Review Committee on August 20 and forwarded to the City Council for adoption in September. As I have said in the past three budgets, I want to commend our department heads and employees for preparing budgets that balance the current economic climate with continued delivery of quality services. Over the last three years, the General Fund budget has increased just 1.71%, compared to a 6.48% rise in the Consumer Price Index for Dallas-Fort Worth and a 9.3% increase in the Municipal Cost Index (MCI). [The MCI is a statistic developed by American City & County magazine that is designed to show the specific effects of inflation on the cost of providing city services. It differs from the Consumer Price Index by including elements common to cities, like health care, fuel, and construction materials.] 3 CITYWIDE EXPENDITURE ISSUES  Seven categories account for 85% of the total budget’s expenditures. Of these, four are level or decreasing for FY2013: PERSONNEL  Salaries and benefits comprise 53% ($23.3 million) of the $44 million total budget. Three full-time Library positions are being added; with other changes, total full-time positions rise from 241 to 243. Salary changes  A 3% market raise is included in the FY2013 budget, amounting to an increase of about $507,400 citywide. No raise was included in the FY2012 budget; the FY2011 budget included a 3% raise. Under the City’s pay plan, about 15% of employees remain eligible for 3% merit-based pay raises. The City continues to enjoy a very low employee turnover rate, which is an indicator that our salaries and benefits are competitive with other area cities and private employers. Maintaining a competitive salary and benefits plan is essential for retaining and recruiting quality employees. Within the departmental budgets, the following changes are included: • Relocation of Sanitation Department’s Neighborhood Integrity Officer to Community Development Department. • Addition of one new Sanitation worker position in Sanitation Department. • Deletion of one position in Facilities Maintenance. • Relocation of one Utility position from the Utility Billing Office to the Utilities Division. • Conversion of full-time Purchasing Assistant in Finance to part-time position. Benefit changes  Employee health insurance  No change is proposed for employee health insurance benefits or employee contributions. In calendar 2007-2011 and so far in 2012, the plan has operated at a surplus, and the Self-Insurance Fund’s balance CategoryFY2012FY2013Change $Change % Personnel costs$22,677,265$23,329,230$651,9652.87% Treatment charges$6,737,339$7,242,506$505,1677.50% Library$196,555$600,000$403,445205.26% Capital projects$5,227,602$5,227,602 $00.00% Electricity costs $627,253$626,000 ($1,253)‐0.20% Equip. replacement$540,061$507,772 ($32,289)‐5.98% Fuel costs $436,840$426,840 ($10,000)‐2.29% Subtotal $36,442,915$37,959,950$1,517,0354.16% Total budget $43,027,730$44,275,593$1,247,8632.90% Percent of budget 84.70%85.74% Major expenditure categories comparison 4 has grown. Maintaining the contributions to the fund seems to be a prudent and appropriate course. Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) costs  The proposed FY2013 budget includes a contribution rate of 8.26%, down from 10.5% in FY2012. Last year the rate declined from 13.87% to 10.5%. The FY2013 rate includes a cost of living adjustment (COLA) for retirees and service credit update for current employees; without these the required rate would be 6.8%. For many years the City has followed a policy of intermittently granting cost of living adjustments for retired employees. This policy has helped keep the City’s TMRS rate low while providing relief to its retirees from constant cost increases resulting from inflation. The City last adjusted retiree benefits in FY2008. Firefighters’ Relief and Retirement Fund (FRRF) costs  University Park Fire Department personnel belong to a separate retirement system that is governed by a local board made up of three firefighters, two local residents, and two City representatives. The FRRF is structured as a defined benefit plan and is currently underfunded on an actuarial basis, although its status has improved due to changes in the plan. In 2008 the firefighters voted to increase their own contribution rate from 10% of gross pay to 15% over a three year period, beginning in FY2010. This move was designed to restore the plan to actuarial soundness and ultimately match the City’s contribution rate of 15.54%. In FY2011 and FY2012 the firefighters paid in 14% of gross salary, up from 12%. Since the 2008 plan amendments, the FRRF plan has been changed so that employee contribution increases will only occur in years when there is an overall pay increase. Consequently the firefighter contribution rate is expected to rise to 15% for 2013. TREATMENT CHARGES  University Park relies on two outside providers for treatment of water (DCPCMUD) and wastewater (City of Dallas Water Utilities). Treatment charges comprise about half the cost of University Park’s water and wastewater operation. The amount budgeted and expended for outside treatment can vary dramatically from year to year, depending on volume and rate, and sometimes in different directions. For FY2013, the cost of purchased water is projected to rise 12.7%, while wastewater costs are dropping 1.8%. Water treatment  The MUD’s plan to finance the construction of their new membrane filter plant relies on a multi-year series of rate increases. Fortunately, the rates proposed and adopted to date have been lower than initial forecasts. For example, the rate for FY2013 is $2.2935 per 1,000 gallons, while the previous projection was $2.4878. Similarly, the FY2012 rate of $2.0281 was originally projected to be $2.1709. Although the projected volume of water to be purchased is decreasing for FY2013, the 13% rate increase results in a $549,209 increase in budgeted water purchases: FY2010FY2011FY2012 FY2013 Change $Change % Rate per 1,000  gallons $1.783 $2.014$2.028 $2.294 $0.2713.09% Forecast gallons  (000) 2,138,238 2,162,3372,135,813 2,128,216 (7,597)  ‐0.36% Budgeted  purchases $3,812,051$4,355,379$4,331,642 $4,881,063 $549,42112.68% 5 The chart on the next page depicts the impact of the MUD plant conversion on wholesale water rates. As noted earlier, City staff is working currently to select a rate consultant. Wastewater treatment  The other major treatment cost item is wastewater treatment, which is provided by the City of Dallas Water Utilities. For FY2013, University Park will pay $2,361,443, down 1.84% from $2,405,697 in FY2012. Compared with one year ago, consumption (monthly winter household water use) fell by 4.2%, from 79,294,000 gallons to 75,960,000. This is multiplied against the proposed rate per 1,000 gallons (up 11.37%) and infiltration/inflow factor (down 7.99%). LIBRARY  As mentioned, effective October 1, 2012 the University Park Library will become a full City operation. Recruitment for a Library Director is currently underway, and a new Director should be appointed and in place by early October. The current Director will remain until shortly after the first of the year, as a City employee. Retaining the outgoing Director is expected to aid in the move to the Library’s new space in Preston Center. Construction on that location, which is on the second floor of a new office building, is on schedule. Current plans are for the Library to relocate near the end of the year and open at Preston Center in early January 2013. The UP Public Library has been operated since 2001 by the not-for-profit University Park Friends of the Library. The City supported the library financially; in recent years the Executive Department budget included $196,555 for library support. Now the library has been established as a new City department, and the FY2013 budget proposes a first- year budget of $600,000. The Friends have agreed to fund $300,000 for the first year; ultimately the Friends have agreed to provide $500,000 annually, if their capital campaign is successful. Consequently, the net budget impact to the City for FY2013 is an expenditure increase of $103,445: $1.207 $1.205 $1.316  $1.783  $2.014 $2.028  $2.294 $2.373 $2.347 $2.321 $0.000  $0.500  $1.000  $1.500  $2.000  $2.500  FY07FY08FY09FY10FY11FY12FY13FY14FY15FY16 MUD water  rate per 1,000 gallons 6 CAPITAL PROJECT CONTRIBUTIONS  The FY2013 budget continues the City’s successful practice of funding its capital projects on a pay-as- you-go rather than debt. As with the prior three years, no increases are proposed for the Utility Fund contribution of $2,195,415 or the General Fund contribution of $3,032,187. These amounts are included in the Transfers Departments in the General and Utility Funds. The budgeted transfers and other sources help fund the City’s Capital Improvements Program (CIP), so that in a given year the amount of project expenditure may be sharply higher or lower than the annual budgeted contribution. The Capital Projects Review Committee will meet with City staff to consider the capital budget for FY2013 and projections for FY2014-2017. Once approved by the City Council by resolution, any subsequent changes to the FY2013 capital budget and five-year CIP must first be reviewed by the Committee before being considered by the City Council. ELECTRICITY, EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT, AND FUEL  Projected expenditures for these three categories are level or down slightly, reflecting a leveling off in prices. The City purchases electricity via its membership in TCAP, the Texas Coalition for Affordable Power. For FY2013 the budget includes $626,000 for electricity, compared with $627,253 in FY2012. Budgeted contributions for replacement of motorized equipment total $507,772, versus $540,061 last year. This is an internal charge that appears as expenditure in the user departments and revenue in the Equipment Services Fund. Fuel costs are projected to remain nearly the same for FY2013. The City is budgeting for $3.25 per gallon for gasoline and $3.45 for diesel, compared with $3.00 and $3.40 in FY2011. Citywide FY2013 fuel purchases are projected to total $426,840 for FY2013, versus the FY2012 budget of $436,840. FY2011FY2012FY2013 $ Change Revenues$0$0$300,000 $300,000 Expenditures$196,555$196,555$600,000 $403,445 Net budget impact:($196,555)($196,555)($300,000)($103,445) Library impact on City budget 7 DISCUSSION OF TAXES AND UTILITY RATES    GENERAL FUND    Revenue considerations Non-property tax revenues comprise $11,484,621 of the City’s $27,286,305 General Fund revenue budget and include everything from sales tax to franchise fees to swimming pool passes. Sales tax  City sales tax revenues have improved consistently since FY2009 and are expected to exceed budget in FY2012. The City’s sales tax consultants have continued to work at submitting requests for retroactive recoveries of taxes distributed to other jurisdictions. The chart below displays recent sales tax history. Building permits  Permit revenue in FY2012 has nearly matched FY2011’s extraordinary spike: $3.46 $3.03 $3.03 $3.18 $3.34 $- $0.50 $1.00 $1.50 $2.00 $2.50 $3.00 $3.50 $4.00 FY09FY10FY11FY12FY13 Mi l l i o n s City Sales Tax  Revenue FY2009‐FY2013 Budget Actual $- $0.50 $1.00 $1.50 $2.00 $2.50 $3.00 $3.50 FY2008FY2009FY2010FY2011FY2012FY2013 Mi l l i o n s Building Permit Revenue FY2008‐FY2013 Budget Actual 8 The building permit revenue budget for the last five years has remained at $1,400,000 and is proposed to stay there for FY2013. This practice prevents future year budgets from being dependent on an uncertain or unstable level of permit revenue. Property tax impact  The 2012 overall tax base of $5,587,424,812 is up for the first time since 2009. Interestingly, the 0.35%, or $19,336,288, rise is solely due to $69,332,692 in new construction. Existing property declined very slightly. Of the total tax base, residential property comprises 87% of the parcels and 93% of the value. The FY2013 budget proposes to maintain the property tax rate at its current level, 27.845 cents per $100 taxable value. This will result in a budgeted property tax revenue increase of $53,842. The table below compares this year with the past three: The owner of a home whose value decreased by the citywide average would pay $1 less in City property taxes, from $2,435 to $2,434. The owner of an average home with a homestead exemption whose value did not change in assessed value this year would pay $2,435, the same as last year. The proposed $0.27845 rate is below the effective tax rate (ETR) of $0.279174, just barely. The ETR is the tax rate that would raise the same dollar amount of revenue as last year, on properties that were on the tax roll in both years. The value of new construction is excluded from the ETR calculation. From an ETR standpoint, total tax revenues are actually decreasing 0.26%. Because the City’s proposed rate is lower than the ETR, the City is not required legally to hold the additional public hearings required by State Truth in Taxation law. Even so, a second hearing has been scheduled to provide the fullest opportunity for public review and comment. UTILITY FUND  As described earlier in this memo, while the FY2013 budget does not propose increases to City retail water or wastewater rates, these rates changes will be required in the near future. The comprehensive rate Property tax rate comparison, FY2009 – FY2012 AdoptedAdoptedAdopted Proposed Tax purposeFY2010FY2011FY2012 FY2013 Op. & Maint.0.26548 0.27845 0.27845 0.27845  Debt  Service0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000  Total Tax Rate0.26548 0.27845 0.27845 0.27845  Property tax levy  comparison, FY2009 – FY2012 Assessed Value  (Market) $1,189,311 $1,120,199 $1,093,015 $1,092,539  Less 20% Hmstd  Exmp ($237,862)($224,040)($218,603)($218,508) Taxable Value $951,449 $896,159 $874,412 $874,032  Tax Rate per $100$0.26548 $0.27845 $0.27845 $0.27845  City Tax Levy $2,526 $2,495 $2,435 $2,434  Proposed  FY2013 Adopted  FY2010 Adopted  FY2011 Adopted  FY2012 9 study will provide a chance to factor in issues like conservation incentives and allocation of costs between base and consumption elements of the rate. Non-treatment related expenditures are proposed to increase to accommodate recent increased activity. Actual expenditures for the Backfill Materials and Utility Main Maintenance accounts have averaged $464,113 over the past three years; the proposed FY2013 budget for these accounts is $413,000, up from $380,000 in FY2012. SANITATION FUND  No change is proposed for City sanitation (solid waste and recycling collection) fees. Rates were last increased in FY2009. The proposed FY2013 expenditure budget of $2,771,803 is down 3.37% from $2,868,476 in FY2012. Reasons include lower personnel costs, reduced landfill budget, and lower equipment replacement charges. The Neighborhood Integrity Officer position is being moved from the Sanitation Department to the Community Development Department. This reduction is offset by the addition of one new sanitation worker position. The revenue budget has been reduced 4.32% to reflect revenues more realistically. The FY2013 total is $2,937,660, versus $3,070,451 last year. The Fund has a budgeted gain of $165,857, the result of subtracting budgeted expenditures from revenues. Consistent with past years, the Sanitation Budget contains a $100,000 placeholder (labeled “Disposal Fees Contingency” in the line-item budget), which is intended to promote accumulation of reserves toward future landfill needs. CONCLUSION  The proposed budget is now ready for review by the Employee Benefits, Finance, and Insurance Advisory Committees. Staff proposes the following schedule to satisfy the public hearing and notice requirements for the FY2013 budget’s adoption: Date Day Description August 6/7 Tuesday Submit proposed budget to City Council and file with City Secretary August 21 Tuesday Receive staff briefing on budget and hold public hearing August 28 Tuesday Hold second public hearing September 4 Tuesday Adopt budget and related ordinances October 1 Monday New budget takes effect Staff looks forward to meeting with the City Council and advisory committees to discuss the budget in more detail. We will be happy to provide any additional information that will be helpful during your consideration. 10 CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS FY2013 PROPOSED BUDGET BY FUND AND DEPARTMENT 8/7/2012 Fund / Org Unit / Department FY2011 Actual FY2012 Adopted  Budget FY2013 Proposed  Budget $ Change% Change GENERAL FUND  Revenues 01‐11 REVENUES$29,720,043$26,758,000$27,286,305$528,3051.97% Total Revenues $29,720,043$26,758,000$27,286,305$528,3051.97% Expenditures 01‐02 EXECUTIVE $1,166,906$1,187,135$947,218 ($239,917)‐20.21% 01‐03 FINANCE $1,192,3861,059,604$1,023,093 ($36,511)‐3.45% 01‐04 HUMAN RESOURCES $351,049363,849$354,043 ($9,806)‐2.70% 01‐05 INFORMATION SERVICES $918,087996,662$980,320 ($16,342)‐1.64% 01‐06 LIBRARY $0 0$600,000 $600,000#DIV/0! 01‐10 COURT $310,298331,720$341,706 $9,9863.01% 01‐19 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT $1,023,2811,016,899$1,155,595 $138,69613.64% 01‐20 ENGINEERING $777,939744,212$750,505 $6,2930.85% 01‐25 TRAFFIC $810,201848,934$862,322 $13,3881.58% 01‐35 FACILITY MAINTENANCE $748,700755,293$581,232 ($174,061)‐23.05% 01‐40 FIRE $4,957,7414,860,342$5,040,718 $180,3763.71% 01‐50 POLICE $6,509,9826,666,922$6,795,268 $128,3461.93% 01‐70 PARKS $2,819,7702,834,510$2,745,922 ($88,588)‐3.13% 01‐75 SWIMMING POOL $272,103269,583$275,869 $6,2862.33% 01‐80 STREETS $1,737,5301,756,234$1,775,323 $19,0891.09% 01‐85 TRANSFERS $3,407,1963,032,187$3,032,187 $00.00% Total Expenditures $27,003,169$26,724,086$27,261,321$537,2352.01% General Fund Surplus/(Deficit)$2,716,874$33,914$24,984 ($8,930)‐26.33% UTILITY FUND Revenues 02‐11 REVENUES 14,386,443$         $13,445,004$14,250,997$805,9935.99% Total Revenues $14,386,44313,445,004$         14,250,997$         $805,9935.99% Expenditures 02‐21 UTILITY OFFICE $7,942,476$7,882,997$8,428,704 $545,7076.92% 02‐22 UTILITIES 3,505,3983,266,3063,365,480 $99,1743.04% 02‐23 STORM WATER 72,965 90,450252,870 $162,420179.57% 02‐85 TRANSFERS 2,195,4152,195,4152,195,415 $00.00% Total Expenditures $13,716,254$13,435,168$14,242,469$807,3016.01% Utility Fund Surplus/(Deficit)$670,189 $9,836 $8,528 ($1,308)‐13.30% SANITATION FUND  Revenues 04‐11 REVENUES $2,953,835$3,070,451$2,937,660 ($132,791)‐4.32% Total Revenues $2,953,835$3,070,451$2,937,660 ($132,791)‐4.32% Expenditures 04‐60 SANITATION $2,686,568$2,868,476$2,771,803 ($96,673)‐3.37% Total Expenditures $2,686,568$2,868,476$2,771,803 ($96,673)‐3.37% Sanitation Fund Surplus/(Deficit)$267,267$201,975$165,857 ($36,118)‐17.88% TOTAL REVENUES $47,060,321$43,273,455$44,474,962$1,201,5072.78% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 43,405,99143,027,73044,275,593$1,247,8632.90% TOTAL SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)$3,654,330$245,725$199,369 ($46,356) 11 CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS FY2013 PROPOSED  BUDGET PROPERTY TAX IMPACT 8/7/2012 FY2012 FY2013 FY2011 ADOPTEDPROPOSEDDOLLARPERCENT ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGETCHANGECHANGE TOTAL CERTIFIED TAXABLE VALUE 5,707,112,954$     5,568,088,524$     5,587,424,812$     19,336,288$         0.34% TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUES NEEDED:27,003,169$           26,758,000$           27,286,305$           528,305$              1.96%   NON PROPERTY TAX REVENUE   Sales tax 3,479,629$             3,178,851$             3,338,000$             159,149$              4.57%   Franchise fees 2,207,303               1,910,000               2,050,000               140,000$              6.34%   Building permits 2,846,125               1,400,000               1,400,000               ‐$                            0.00%   Traffic/parking fines 458,721                   531,000                   556,000                   25,000$                 5.45%   Service charges 790,735                   1,042,730               865,055                   (177,675)$             ‐22.47%   Direct  alarm monitoring fees 799,884                   819,000                   866,989                   47,989$                 6.00%   Interest income 202,120                   265,000                   265,000                   ‐$                            0.00%   Utility Fund contribution 600,000                   600,000                   600,000                   ‐$                            0.00%   Miscellaneous 2,370,927               1,263,077               1,543,077               280,000$              11.81%     TOTAL NON PROPERTY TAX REV.13,755,444$           11,009,658$           11,484,121$           474,463$              3.45%   PROPERTY TAX REVENUE   Operations & Maintenance (O&M) need 15,786,241$           15,504,342$           15,558,184$           53,842$                 0.34%   Penalty/interest & attorney's fees 119,527                   145,000                   145,000                   ‐$                            0.00%   Delinquent (prior years) taxes 58,835                     99,000                     99,000                     ‐$                            0.00%   TOTAL PROP TAX OP REQUEST 15,964,603$           15,748,342$           15,802,184$           53,842$                 0.34% ‐$                             REVENUES LESS EXPENDITURES 2,716,878               ‐                           ‐                           ‐                          ‐$                             DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENT ‐$                         ‐$                         ‐$                         ‐$                            #DIV/0! ‐$                             PROPERTY TAX RATE ‐$                             Operations & Maintenance (O&M)0.27661$                0.27845$                0.27845$                0$                           0.00%  Debt Service ‐                           ‐                           ‐                           ‐$                            #DIV/0!   Total Property Tax Rate per $100 0.27661$                0.27845$                0.27845$                0.00000$              0.00% IMPACT ON HOMEOWNER Average single‐family market value $1,120,199$1,093,015$1,092,539 ‐$476 ‐0.04%   Less:  20% homestead exemption $224,040$218,603$218,508 ‐$95 ‐0.04% Average single‐family taxable value $896,159$874,412$874,032 ‐$381 ‐0.04% Tax levy $2,479 $2,435$2,433.74 ‐$1 ‐0.04% Increase in levy over prior year ‐$47 ‐$44 ‐$1 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 01 ‐02  EX E C U T I V E LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 10 0 1  RE G U L A R  EA R N I N G S $4 5 0 , 3 3 4 $ 4 5 7 , 6 6 7 $ 4 7 7 , 2 1 0 $ 1 9 , 5 4 3   4.27% 10 0 2  OV E R T I M E  EA R N I N G S $0 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! 10 0 5  LO N G E V I T Y  PA Y $2 , 2 2 7 $ 2 , 8 4 8 $ 3 , 1 3 4 $2 8 6   10 . 0 4 % 10 0 7  CA R  AL L O W A N C E $7 , 2 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 $0   0.00% 11 1 0  EM P L O Y E R S  SH A R E  F. I . C . A . $2 9 , 1 2 5 $ 3 0 , 5 3 6 $ 3 1 , 8 7 1 $ 1 , 3 3 5   4.37% 11 2 0  EM P L O Y E R S  SH A R E  T. M . R . S . $6 3 , 0 7 0 $ 4 8 , 1 9 8 $ 3 9 , 5 3 5 ( $ 8 , 6 6 3 ) ‐17 . 9 7 % 11 2 7  RE T I R E M E N T  SU P P L E M E N T A L $4 0 , 0 0 0 $ 4 0 , 0 0 0 $ 4 0 , 0 0 0 $0   0.00% 11 3 0  IN S U R A N C E ‐EM P L O Y E E  LI F E $2 , 9 9 2 $ 2 , 9 7 9 $ 3 , 1 2 7 $1 4 8   4.97% 11 3 1  IN S U R A N C E ‐WO R K M E N S  CO M P $6 1 6 $6 0 8 $5 3 6 ($ 7 2 ) ‐11 . 8 4 % 11 3 5  HE A L T H  IN S U R A N C E $5 4 , 0 0 0 $ 4 5 , 0 0 0 $ 4 5 , 0 0 0 $0   0.00% SA L A R I E S  & BE N E F I T S $6 4 9 , 5 6 4 $6 3 5 , 0 3 6 $6 4 7 , 6 1 3 $ 1 2 , 5 7 7   1.98% 21 0 0  OF F I C E  SU P P L I E S $2 , 9 9 9 $ 3 , 3 2 1 $ 3 , 3 2 1 $0   0.00% 23 1 8  CO M P U T E R  SU P P L I E S $0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $0   0.00% SU P P L I E S $2 , 9 9 9 $ 4 , 3 2 1 $ 4 , 3 2 1 $0   0.00% 30 0 3  BO A R D  ME E T I N G S $9 , 6 3 6 $ 1 3 , 5 6 0 $ 1 0 , 5 6 0 ( $ 3 , 0 0 0 ) ‐22 . 1 2 % 30 1 0  PO S T A G E $2 , 1 1 8 $ 2 , 0 0 0 $ 2 , 1 0 0 $1 0 0   5.00% 30 1 4  PU B L I C A T I O N S $0 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! 30 6 0  PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $3 3 6 , 4 6 9 $ 3 8 6 , 0 5 0 $ 1 3 9 , 2 9 5 ( $ 2 4 6 , 7 5 5 ) ‐63 . 9 2 % 30 6 3  PR O G R A M M I N G / M A I N T E N A N C E $3 1 , 8 0 9 $ 3 1 , 6 7 4 $ 3 3 , 4 8 8 $ 1 , 8 1 4   5.73% 31 1 3  PR I N T I N G $2 0 , 2 9 2 $ 2 0 , 8 2 6 $ 2 0 , 8 2 6 $0   0.00% PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $4 0 0 , 3 2 4 $ 4 5 4 , 1 1 0 $ 2 0 6 , 2 6 9 ( $ 2 4 7 , 8 4 1 ) ‐54 . 5 8 % 41 1 0  HE A T , L I G H T , W A T E R  UT I L $1 1 , 2 9 1 $ 1 2 , 3 2 0 $ 1 0 , 6 0 0 ( $ 1 , 7 2 0 ) ‐13 . 9 6 % 41 2 0  TE L E P H O N E  SE R V I C E $5 , 6 9 4 $ 5 , 7 9 4 $ 6 , 4 5 6 $6 6 2   11 . 4 3 % UT I L I T I E S $1 6 , 9 8 5 $ 1 8 , 1 1 4 $ 1 7 , 0 5 6 ( $ 1 , 0 5 8 ) ‐5.84% 55 0 6  IN S U R A N C E ‐GE N E R A L  LI A B I L I T Y $9 1 5 $3 2 9 $3 2 9 $0   0.00% 55 1 4  IN S U R A N C E ‐PU B L . O F F L  LI A B $4 5 , 0 0 0 $ 2 8 , 0 0 0 $ 2 8 , 0 0 0 $0   0.00% 55 1 6  BO N D S ‐OF F I C A L S  & EM P L O Y E E $2 0 0 $2 0 0 $2 0 0 $0   0.00% IN S U R A N C E $4 6 , 1 1 5 $ 2 8 , 5 2 9 $ 2 8 , 5 2 9 $0   0.00% 62 0 0  EQ U I P  RE P A I R S / N O N  VE H I C L E $0 $6 0 0 $6 0 0 $0   0.00% 01 - 0 2 E X E C U T I V E 1 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 01 ‐02  EX E C U T I V E LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % OU T S I D E  SE R V I C E S $0 $6 0 0 $6 0 0 $0   0.00% 71 5 0  DU E S  & SU B S C R I P T I O N S $1 4 , 7 0 4 $ 1 4 , 1 7 0 $ 1 4 , 2 7 5 $1 0 5   0.74% 71 7 0  TR A V E L  EX P E N S E $3 , 9 5 4 $ 9 , 2 6 0 $ 7 , 2 6 0 ( $ 2 , 0 0 0 ) ‐21 . 6 0 % 72 0 1  CO M P U T E R  EQ U I P M E N T  BE L O W  $5 0 0 0 $5 , 7 8 5 $5 0 0 $ 1 , 8 0 0 $ 1 , 3 0 0   26 0 . 0 0 % 72 0 2  MI C R O  CO M P U T E R  SO F T W A R E $1 4 8 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $0 ( $ 1 , 0 0 0 ) ‐10 0 . 0 0 % 72 2 1  OT H E R  EX P E N S E $2 , 8 5 9 $ 4 , 6 5 0 $ 4 , 6 5 0 $0   0.00% 72 3 5  YO U T H  AD V I S O R Y  CO M M I S S I O N $1 , 1 9 4 $ 1 , 5 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 $0   0.00% 72 4 0  TU I T I O N  & TR A I N I N G $1 , 8 2 2 $ 4 , 8 4 5 $ 2 , 8 4 5 ( $ 2 , 0 0 0 ) ‐41 . 2 8 % 74 3 2  EL E C T I O N S $2 0 , 4 5 3 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 $0   0.00% 74 7 5  IM P R O V E M E N T S ‐‐ UN D E R  $5 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! OT H E R $5 0 , 9 1 9 $ 4 5 , 9 2 5 $ 4 2 , 3 3 0 ( $ 3 , 5 9 5 ) ‐7.83% 91 0 0  OF F I C E  EQ U I P M E N T $0 $5 0 0 $5 0 0 $0   0.00% 92 0 1  MI C R O  CO M P U T E R  EQ U I P M E N T $0 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! 99 1 0  OF F I C E  FU R N I T U R E $0 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! CA P I T A L  EX P E N D I T U R E S $0 $5 0 0 $5 0 0 $0   0.00% TO T A L  EX E C U T I V E $1 , 1 6 6 , 9 0 6 $ 1 , 1 8 7 , 1 3 5 $ 9 4 7 , 2 1 8 ( $ 2 3 9 , 9 1 7 ) ‐20 . 2 1 % 01 - 0 2 E X E C U T I V E 2 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 01 ‐03  FI N A N C E LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 10 0 1  RE G U L A R  EA R N I N G S $5 6 8 , 7 6 4 $ 5 6 9 , 6 7 2 $ 5 7 2 , 0 8 1 $ 2 , 4 0 9   0. 4 2 % 10 0 2  OV E R T I M E  EA R N I N G S $2 6 8 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! 10 0 5  LO N G E V I T Y  PA Y $5 , 2 5 4 $ 5 , 5 8 1 $ 5 , 3 0 1 ( $ 2 8 0 ) ‐5. 0 2 % 10 0 7  CA R  AL L O W A N C E $7 , 2 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 11 1 0  EM P L O Y E R S  SH A R E  F. I . C . A . $4 0 , 4 3 2 $ 4 1 , 6 5 9 $ 4 1 , 6 9 7 $3 8   0. 0 9 % 11 2 0  EM P L O Y E R S  SH A R E  T. M . R . S . $8 0 , 7 2 1 $ 6 1 , 1 5 6 $ 4 8 , 2 8 7 ( $ 1 2 , 8 6 9 ) ‐21 . 0 4 % 11 3 0  IN S U R A N C E ‐EM P L O Y E E  LI F E $3 , 8 6 7 $ 3 , 8 4 5 $ 3 , 6 3 1 ( $ 2 1 4 ) ‐5. 5 7 % 11 3 1  IN S U R A N C E ‐WO R K M E N S  CO M P $7 2 5 $7 5 7 $6 4 3 ( $ 1 1 4 ) ‐15 . 0 6 % 11 3 5  HE A L T H  IN S U R A N C E $6 3 , 0 0 0 $5 4 , 0 0 0 $4 9 , 5 0 0 ( $ 4 , 5 0 0 ) ‐8. 3 3 % SA L A R I E S  & BE N E F I T S $7 7 0 , 2 3 1 $ 7 4 3 , 8 7 0 $ 7 2 8 , 3 4 0 ( $ 1 5 , 5 3 0 ) ‐2. 0 9 % 21 0 0  OF F I C E  SU P P L I E S $4 , 6 2 6 $ 5 , 5 5 0 $ 5 , 5 6 0 $1 0   0. 1 8 % SU P P L I E S $4 , 6 2 6 $ 5 , 5 5 0 $ 5 , 5 6 0 $1 0   0. 1 8 % 30 0 7  DE L I N Q U E N T  TA X  AT T O R N E Y $2 1 , 0 5 0 $ 2 9 , 0 0 0 $ 2 9 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 30 1 0  PO S T A G E $2 , 0 3 7 $ 2 , 1 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 ( $ 1 0 0 ) ‐4. 7 6 % 30 6 0  PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $1 9 5 , 5 8 9 $ 8 6 , 5 8 0 $ 7 1 , 9 0 0 ( $ 1 4 , 6 8 0 ) ‐16 . 9 6 % 30 6 3  PR O G R A M M I N G / M A I N T E N A N C E $4 7 , 2 2 0 $ 3 8 , 3 9 6 $ 3 9 , 1 6 1 $7 6 5   1. 9 9 % 31 1 3  PR I N T I N G $5 , 5 3 9 $ 6 , 3 5 0 $ 6 , 3 5 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 31 4 1  DA L L A S  CO  TA X  CO L L  SE R V $1 1 , 2 5 8 $ 1 1 , 4 2 0 $ 1 1 , 4 2 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 31 4 5  CE N T R A L  AP P R A I S A L  DI S T R I C $7 5 , 7 1 6 $ 7 7 , 7 4 5 $ 7 5 , 9 5 7 ( $ 1 , 7 8 8 ) ‐2. 3 0 % PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $3 5 8 , 4 0 9 $ 2 5 1 , 5 9 1 $ 2 3 5 , 7 8 8 ( $ 1 5 , 8 0 3 ) ‐6. 2 8 % 41 1 0  HE A T , L I G H T , W A T E R  UT I L $8 , 3 5 1 $ 9 , 1 4 4 $ 7 , 5 0 0 ( $ 1 , 6 4 4 ) ‐17 . 9 8 % 41 2 0  TE L E P H O N E  SE R V I C E $5 , 3 4 0 $ 5 , 2 8 8 $ 5 , 5 0 1 $2 1 3   4. 0 3 % UT I L I T I E S $1 3 , 6 9 1 $ 1 4 , 4 3 2 $ 1 3 , 0 0 1 ( $ 1 , 4 3 1 ) ‐9. 9 2 % 55 0 6  IN S U R A N C E ‐GE N E R A L  LI A B I L I T Y $1 , 2 6 5 $4 5 6 $4 5 6 $0   0. 0 0 % IN S U R A N C E $1 , 2 6 5 $4 5 6 $4 5 6 $0   0. 0 0 % 62 0 0  EQ U I P  RE P A I R S / N O N  VE H I C L E $1 , 2 5 0 $ 1 , 0 1 0 $ 1 , 0 1 0 $0   0. 0 0 % OU T S I D E  SE R V I C E S $1 , 2 5 0 $ 1 , 0 1 0 $ 1 , 0 1 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 71 5 0  DU E S  & SU B S C R I P T I O N S $1 4 , 4 6 3 $ 8 , 5 3 5 $ 1 5 , 1 0 0 $ 6 , 5 6 5   76 . 9 2 % 01 - 0 3 F I N A N C E 3 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 01 ‐03  FI N A N C E LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 71 7 0  TR A V E L  EX P E N S E $8 , 4 0 1 $ 1 1 , 2 5 5 $ 1 0 , 0 9 5 ( $ 1 , 1 6 0 ) ‐10 . 3 1 % 72 0 1  CO M P U T E R  EQ U I P M E N T  BE L O W  $5 0 0 0 $7 , 2 9 2 $ 8 , 0 9 7 $ 1 , 0 0 0 ($7 , 0 9 7 ) ‐87 . 6 5 % 72 0 2  MI C R O  CO M P U T E R  SO F T W A R E $0 $ 4 , 1 7 8 $ 2 , 7 9 8 ( $ 1 , 3 8 0 ) ‐33 . 0 3 % 72 2 1  OT H E R  EX P E N S E $5 , 0 4 7 $ 5 , 9 1 5 $ 5 , 9 1 5 $0   0. 0 0 % 72 4 0  TU I T I O N  & TR A I N I N G $7 , 7 1 3 $ 4 , 7 1 5 $ 4 , 0 3 0 ( $ 6 8 5 ) ‐14 . 5 3 % OT H E R $4 2 , 9 1 6 $ 4 2 , 6 9 5 $ 3 8 , 9 3 8 ( $ 3 , 7 5 7 ) ‐8. 8 0 % 92 0 1  MI C R O  CO M P U T E R  EQ U I P M E N T $0 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! CA P I T A L  EX P E N D I T U R E S $0 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! TO T A L  FI N A N C E $1 , 1 9 2 , 3 8 8 $ 1 , 0 5 9 , 6 0 4 $ 1 , 0 2 3 , 0 9 3 ( $ 3 6 , 5 1 1 ) ‐3. 4 5 % 01 - 0 3 F I N A N C E 4 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 01 ‐04  HU M A N  RE S O U R C E S LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 10 0 1  RE G U L A R  EA R N I N G S $1 8 2 , 0 2 5 $ 1 8 3 , 3 8 8 $ 1 9 1 , 2 0 9 $ 7 , 8 2 1   4. 2 6 % 10 0 5  LO N G E V I T Y  PA Y $1 , 7 8 2 $ 1 , 8 7 4 $ 1 , 9 5 3 $7 9   4. 2 2 % 10 0 7  CA R  AL L O W A N C E $7 , 2 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 11 1 0  EM P L O Y E R S  SH A R E  F. I . C . A . $1 2 , 6 0 0 $ 1 2 , 8 2 4 $ 1 3 , 3 5 9 $5 3 5   4. 1 7 % 11 2 0  EM P L O Y E R S  SH A R E  T. M . R . S . $2 6 , 4 6 9 $ 2 0 , 2 0 8 $ 1 6 , 5 5 0 ( $ 3 , 6 5 8 ) ‐18 . 1 0 % 11 3 0  IN S U R A N C E ‐EM P L O Y E E  LI F E $1 , 2 2 9 $ 1 , 2 1 5 $ 1 , 2 7 6 $6 1   5. 0 2 % 11 3 1  IN S U R A N C E ‐WO R K M E N S  CO M P $2 3 3 $2 5 1 $2 2 0 ($ 3 1 ) ‐12 . 3 5 % 11 3 5  HE A L T H  IN S U R A N C E $1 8 , 0 0 0 $ 1 8 , 0 0 0 $ 1 8 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % SA L A R I E S  & BE N E F I T S $2 4 9 , 5 3 8 $ 2 4 4 , 9 6 0 $ 2 4 9 , 7 6 7 $ 4 , 8 0 7   1. 9 6 % 21 0 0  OF F I C E  SU P P L I E S $9 0 5 $1 , 4 5 0 $1 , 4 5 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 23 1 8  CO M P U T E R  SU P P L I E S $7 1 $7 5 0 $ 1 , 3 0 0 $5 5 0   73 . 3 3 % SU P P L I E S $9 7 6 $ 2 , 2 0 0 $ 2 , 7 5 0 $5 5 0   25 . 0 0 % 30 1 0  PO S T A G E $2 0 4 $3 4 8 $2 7 5 ($ 7 3 ) ‐20 . 9 8 % 30 6 0  PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $1 9 , 2 7 7 $ 3 0 , 4 6 0 $ 2 3 , 1 9 0 ( $ 7 , 2 7 0 ) ‐23 . 8 7 % 30 6 3  PR O G R A M M I N G / M A I N T E N A N C E $1 0 , 1 1 2 $ 9 , 1 7 4 $ 9 , 4 6 9 $2 9 5   3. 2 2 % 31 1 3  PR I N T I N G $1 3 7 $1 0 0 $1 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $2 9 , 7 3 0 $ 4 0 , 0 8 2 $ 3 3 , 0 3 4 ( $ 7 , 0 4 8 ) ‐17 . 5 8 % 41 1 0  HE A T , L I G H T , W A T E R  UT I L $4 , 8 3 9 $ 5 , 2 8 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 ( $ 2 8 0 ) ‐5. 3 0 % 41 2 0  TE L E P H O N E  SE R V I C E $2 , 9 3 3 $ 3 , 0 8 2 $ 3 , 4 2 5 $3 4 3   11 . 1 3 % UT I L I T I E S $7 , 7 7 2 $ 8 , 3 6 2 $ 8 , 4 2 5 $6 3   0. 7 5 % 55 0 6  IN S U R A N C E ‐GE N E R A L  LI A B I L I T Y $4 6 7 $1 6 8 $1 6 8 $0   0. 0 0 % IN S U R A N C E $4 6 7 $1 6 8 $1 6 8 $0   0. 0 0 % 62 0 0  EQ U I P  RE P A I R S / N O N  VE H I C L E $0 $1 5 0 $1 5 0 $0   0. 0 0 % OU T S I D E  SE R V I C E S $0 $1 5 0 $1 5 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 71 1 0  EM P L O Y E E  RE C O G N I T I O N $1 1 , 8 6 7 $ 1 3 , 1 5 0 $ 1 5 , 6 2 0 $ 2 , 4 7 0   18 . 7 8 % 71 5 0  DU E S  & SU B S C R I P T I O N S $1 , 9 3 5 $ 2 , 0 0 0 $ 2 , 1 6 4 $1 6 4   8. 2 0 % 71 7 0  TR A V E L  EX P E N S E $1 , 4 2 2 $ 1 , 9 6 0 $ 1 , 8 5 0 ( $ 1 1 0 ) ‐5. 6 1 % 72 0 1  CO M P U T E R  EQ U I P M E N T  BE L O W  $5 0 0 0 $1 , 4 4 4 $8 6 2 $5 0 0 ( $ 3 6 2 ) ‐42 . 0 0 % 01 - 0 4 H U M A N R E S O U R C E S 5 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 01 ‐04  HU M A N  RE S O U R C E S LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 72 2 1  OT H E R  EX P E N S E $6 , 7 5 4 $ 7 , 5 0 0 $ 7 , 0 5 0 ( $ 4 5 0 ) ‐6. 0 0 % 72 4 0  TU I T I O N  & TR A I N I N G $1 , 5 0 0 $ 2 , 4 5 5 $ 2 , 5 6 5 $1 1 0   4. 4 8 % 72 4 5  TU I T I O N  RE I M B U R S E M E N T $3 7 , 6 4 5 $ 4 0 , 0 0 0 $ 3 0 , 0 0 0 ( $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 ) ‐25 . 0 0 % 74 7 5  IM P R O V E M E N T S ‐UN D E R  $5 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! OT H E R $6 2 , 5 6 7 $ 6 7 , 9 2 7 $ 5 9 , 7 4 9 ( $ 8 , 1 7 8 ) ‐12 . 0 4 % 92 0 1  MI C R O  CO M P U T E R  EQ U I P M E N T $0 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! CA P I T A L  EX P E N D I T U R E S $0 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! TO T A L  HU M A N  RE S O U R C E S $3 5 1 , 0 5 0 $ 3 6 3 , 8 4 9 $ 3 5 4 , 0 4 3 ( $ 9 , 8 0 6 ) ‐2. 7 0 % 01 - 0 4 H U M A N R E S O U R C E S 6 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 01 ‐05  IN F O R M A T I O N  SE R V I C E S LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 10 0 1  RE G U L A R  EA R N I N G S $4 4 6 , 6 0 5 $ 4 5 1 , 3 8 1 $ 4 6 6 , 5 3 0 $ 1 5 , 1 4 9   3. 3 6 % 10 0 5  LO N G E V I T Y  PA Y $1 , 8 7 1 $ 2 , 1 0 9 $ 2 , 3 4 5 $2 3 6   11 . 1 9 % 10 0 7  CA R  AL L O W A N C E $7 , 2 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 10 0 9  CE L L  PH O N E  AL L O W A N C E $7 8 5 $ 1 , 2 0 0 $ 1 , 2 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 11 1 0  EM P L O Y E R S  SH A R E  F. I . C . A . $3 2 , 2 5 5 $ 3 4 , 2 0 9 $ 3 5 , 3 4 1 $ 1 , 1 3 2   3. 3 1 % 11 2 0  EM P L O Y E R S  SH A R E  T. M . R . S . $6 3 , 4 1 8 $ 4 8 , 4 9 9 $ 3 9 , 4 2 3 ( $ 9 , 0 7 6 ) ‐18 . 7 1 % 11 3 0  IN S U R A N C E ‐EM P L O Y E E  LI F E $2 , 9 0 6 $ 2 , 4 3 8 $ 3 , 1 1 5 $6 7 7   27 . 7 7 % 11 3 1  IN S U R A N C E ‐WO R K M E N S  CO M P $5 3 2 $6 0 1 $5 2 5 ($ 7 6 ) ‐12 . 6 5 % 11 3 5  HE A L T H  IN S U R A N C E $4 5 , 0 0 0 $ 4 5 , 0 0 0 $ 4 5 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % SA L A R I E S  & BE N E F I T S $6 0 0 , 5 7 2 $5 9 2 , 6 3 7 $6 0 0 , 6 7 9 $8 , 0 4 2   1. 3 6 % 21 0 0  OF F I C E  SU P P L I E S $6 4 8 $ 1 , 5 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 23 1 8  CO M P U T E R  SU P P L I E S $1 , 9 2 6 $ 1 2 , 8 4 2 $ 1 2 , 0 2 9 ( $ 8 1 3 ) ‐6. 3 3 % SU P P L I E S $2 , 5 7 4 $ 1 4 , 3 4 2 $ 1 3 , 5 2 9 ($ 8 1 3 ) ‐5. 6 7 % 30 1 0  PO S T A G E $1 1 7 $1 3 9 $1 2 0 ($ 1 9 ) ‐13 . 6 7 % 30 6 0  PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $3 4 , 9 4 6 $ 4 1 , 9 1 0 $ 3 6 , 4 0 0 ( $ 5 , 5 1 0 ) ‐13 . 1 5 % 30 6 3  PR O G R A M M I N G / M A I N T E N A N C E $1 0 9 , 3 8 4 $ 1 1 7 , 8 7 3 $ 1 1 2 , 2 8 5 ( $ 5 , 5 8 8 ) ‐4. 7 4 % PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $1 4 4 , 4 4 7 $ 1 5 9 , 9 2 2 $ 1 4 8 , 8 0 5 ($ 1 1 , 1 1 7 ) ‐6. 9 5 % 41 1 0  HE A T , L I G H T , W A T E R  UT I L $7 , 7 2 3 $ 8 , 5 1 4 $ 7 , 3 0 0 ( $ 1 , 2 1 4 ) ‐14 . 2 6 % 41 2 0  TE L E P H O N E  SE R V I C E $8 1 , 8 9 2 $ 1 0 3 , 0 2 4 $ 1 0 0 , 5 5 8 ( $ 2 , 4 6 6 ) ‐2. 3 9 % UT I L I T I E S $8 9 , 6 1 5 $ 1 1 1 , 5 3 8 $ 1 0 7 , 8 5 8 ($ 3 , 6 8 0 ) ‐3. 3 0 % 55 0 6  IN S U R A N C E ‐GE N E R A L  LI A B I L I T Y $5 5 2 $1 9 9 $1 9 9 $0   0. 0 0 % IN S U R A N C E $5 5 2 $1 9 9 $1 9 9 $0   0. 0 0 % 62 0 0  EQ U I P  RE P A I R S / N O N  VE H I C L E $3 3 , 0 3 8 $ 4 3 , 3 1 5 $ 3 4 , 9 9 3 ( $ 8 , 3 2 2 ) ‐19 . 2 1 % OU T S I D E  SE R V I C E S $3 3 , 0 3 8 $ 4 3 , 3 1 5 $ 3 4 , 9 9 3 ($ 8 , 3 2 2 ) ‐19 . 2 1 % 71 5 0  DU E S  & SU B S C R I P T I O N S $3 4 7 $3 3 5 $6 3 5 $3 0 0   89 . 5 5 % 71 7 0  TR A V E L  EX P E N S E $3 , 1 9 4 $ 1 4 , 8 3 0 $ 1 5 , 4 4 5 $6 1 5   4. 1 5 % 72 0 1  CO M P U T E R  EQ U I P M E N T  BE L O W  $5 0 0 0 $8 , 2 7 8 $ 2 3 , 2 9 4 $ 2 7 , 4 7 0 $ 4 , 1 7 6   17 . 9 3 % 72 0 2  MI C R O  CO M P U T E R  SO F T W A R E $1 , 0 2 8 $ 1 , 6 2 0 $ 1 , 6 2 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 01 - 0 5 I N F O R M A T I O N S E R V I C E S 7 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 01 ‐05  IN F O R M A T I O N  SE R V I C E S LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 72 2 1  OT H E R  EX P E N S E $2 1 1 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! 72 4 0  TU I T I O N  & TR A I N I N G $2 , 8 3 5 $ 1 5 , 6 3 0 $ 1 9 , 0 8 7 $ 3 , 4 5 7   22 . 1 2 % OT H E R $1 5 , 8 9 3 $ 5 5 , 7 0 9 $ 6 4 , 2 5 7 $8 , 5 4 8   15 . 3 4 % 92 0 1  MI C R O  CO M P U T E R  EQ U I P M E N T $3 1 , 3 9 5 $ 1 9 , 0 0 0 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 ( $ 9 , 0 0 0 ) ‐47 . 3 7 % CA P I T A L  EX P E N D I T U R E S $3 1 , 3 9 5 $ 1 9 , 0 0 0 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 ($ 9 , 0 0 0 ) ‐47 . 3 7 % TO T A L  IN F O R M A T I O N  SE R V I C E S $9 1 8 , 0 8 6 $ 9 9 6 , 6 6 2 $ 9 8 0 , 3 2 0 ($ 1 6 , 3 4 2 ) ‐1. 6 4 % 01 - 0 5 I N F O R M A T I O N S E R V I C E S 8 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 01 ‐06  LI B R A R Y LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 10 0 1  RE G U L A R  EA R N I N G S $0 $0 $ 3 1 9 , 1 3 9 $ 3 1 9 , 1 3 9 # D I V / 0 ! 10 0 7  CA R  AL L O W A N C E $0 $0 $ 7 , 5 0 0 $ 7 , 5 0 0 # D I V / 0 ! 11 1 0  EM P L O Y E R S  SH A R E  F. I . C . A . $0 $0 $ 2 2 , 0 4 8 $ 2 2 , 0 4 8 # D I V / 0 ! 11 2 0  EM P L O Y E R S  SH A R E  T. M . R . S . $0 $0 $ 3 1 , 0 1 4 $ 3 1 , 0 1 4 # D I V / 0 ! 11 3 0  IN S U R A N C E ‐EM P L O Y E E  LI F E $0 $0 $ 1 , 7 3 1 $ 1 , 7 3 1 # D I V / 0 ! 11 3 1  IN S U R A N C E ‐WO R K E R S  CO M P $0 $0 $3 3 6 $3 3 6 # D I V / 0 ! 11 3 5  HE A L T H  IN S U R A N C E $0 $0 $9 , 0 0 0 $9 , 0 0 0 # D I V / 0 ! SA L A R I E S  & BE N E F I T S $0 $0 $ 3 9 0 , 7 6 8 $ 3 9 0 , 7 6 8 # D I V / 0 ! 21 0 0  OF F I C E  SU P P L I E S $0 $0 $5 , 5 0 0   $5 , 5 0 0 # D I V / 0 ! 23 5 0  SU P P L I E S  & MA T E R I A L S $0 $0 $6 , 5 3 2   $6 , 5 3 2 # D I V / 0 ! 23 5 5  MA T E R I A L S  BU D G E T $0 $0 $ 8 4 , 5 0 0   $8 4 , 5 0 0 # D I V / 0 ! SU P P L I E S $0 $0 $ 9 6 , 5 3 2   $9 6 , 5 3 2 # D I V / 0 ! 30 1 0  PO S T A G E $0 $0 $1 , 0 0 0   $1 , 0 0 0 # D I V / 0 ! 30 6 0  PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $0 $0 $4 , 0 0 0   $4 , 0 0 0 # D I V / 0 ! 30 6 3  PR O G R A M M I N G / M A I N T E N A N C E $0 $0 $ 2 5 , 0 0 0   $2 5 , 0 0 0 # D I V / 0 ! 31 1 3  PR I N T I N G $0 $0 $3 , 0 0 0   $3 , 0 0 0 # D I V / 0 ! PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $0 $0 $3 3 , 0 0 0   $3 3 , 0 0 0 # D I V / 0 ! 41 1 0  HE A T , L I G H T , W A T E R  UT I L $0 $0 $6 0 , 0 0 0   $6 0 , 0 0 0 # D I V / 0 ! 41 2 0  TE L E P H O N E  SE R V I C E $0 $0 $5 , 3 0 0   $5 , 3 0 0 # D I V / 0 ! UT I L I T I E S $0 $0 $6 5 , 3 0 0   $6 5 , 3 0 0 # D I V / 0 ! 55 0 6  IN S U R A N C E ‐GE N ' L  LI A B I L I T Y $0 $0 $2 , 5 0 0   $2 , 5 0 0 # D I V / 0 ! 55 1 0  IN S U R A N C E ‐BU I L D I N G  & CO N T E N T S $0 $0 $2 , 5 0 0   $2 , 5 0 0 # D I V / 0 ! IN S U R A N C E $0 $0 $5 , 0 0 0   $5 , 0 0 0 # D I V / 0 ! 62 0 0  EQ U I P  RE P A I R S / N O N  VE H I C L E $0 $0 $5 0 0   $5 0 0 # D I V / 0 ! OU T S I D E  SE R V I C E S $0 $0 $5 0 0   $5 0 0 # D I V / 0 ! 71 5 0  DU E S  & SU B S C R I P T I O N S $0 $0 $4 0 0   $4 0 0 # D I V / 0 ! 71 7 0  TR A V E L  EX P E N S E $0 $0 $2 , 0 0 0   $2 , 0 0 0 # D I V / 0 ! 01 - 0 6 L I B R A R Y 9 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 01 ‐06  LI B R A R Y LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 72 0 1  CO M P U T E R  EQ U I P M E N T  < $5 0 0 0 $0 $ 0 $1 , 0 0 0   $1 , 0 0 0 # D I V / 0 ! 72 0 2  MI C R O  CO M P U T E R  SO F T W A R E $0 $ 0 $1 , 0 0 0   $1 , 0 0 0 # D I V / 0 ! 72 2 1  OT H E R  EX P E N S E $0 $0 $2 , 5 0 0   $2 , 5 0 0 # D I V / 0 ! 72 4 0  TU I T I O N  & TR A I N I N G $0 $0 $2 , 0 0 0   $2 , 0 0 0 # D I V / 0 ! OT H E R $0 $0 $8 , 9 0 0   $8 , 9 0 0 # D I V / 0 ! 91 0 0  OF F I C E  EQ U I P M E N T $0 $0 $0   $0 # D I V / 0 ! CA P I T A L  EX P E N D I T U R E S $0 $0 $0   $0 # D I V / 0 ! TO T A L  LI B R A R Y $0 $0 $ 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 #D I V / 0 ! 01 - 0 6 L I B R A R Y 10 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 01 ‐10  CO U R T LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 10 0 1  RE G U L A R  EA R N I N G S $1 8 9 , 8 8 3 $ 1 9 1 , 0 0 6 $ 1 9 8 , 6 5 3 $ 7 , 6 4 7   4. 0 0 % 10 0 2  OV E R T I M E  EA R N I N G S $4 , 3 3 0 $ 4 , 5 3 8 $ 8 , 6 6 5 $ 4 , 1 2 7   90 . 9 4 % 10 0 5  LO N G E V I T Y  PA Y $5 4 2 $6 3 4 $ 3 , 0 5 4 $ 2 , 4 2 0   38 1 . 7 0 % 11 1 0  EM P L O Y E R S  SH A R E  F. I . C . A . $1 3 , 4 8 4 $ 1 5 , 0 0 8 $ 1 6 , 0 9 3 $ 1 , 0 8 5   7. 2 3 % 11 2 0  EM P L O Y E R S  SH A R E  T. M . R . S . $1 5 , 7 7 8 $ 1 2 , 4 5 5 $ 1 0 , 2 6 3 ( $ 2 , 1 9 2 ) ‐17 . 6 0 % 11 3 0  IN S U R A N C E ‐EM P L O Y E E  LI F E $7 3 4 $7 5 2 $7 9 3 $4 1   5. 4 5 % 11 3 1  IN S U R A N C E ‐WO R K M E N S  CO M P $2 3 2 $2 5 5 $2 2 6 ($ 2 9 ) ‐11 . 3 7 % 11 3 5  HE A L T H  IN S U R A N C E $3 6 , 0 0 0 $ 3 6 , 0 0 0 $ 3 6 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % SA L A R I E S  & BE N E F I T S $2 6 0 , 9 8 3 $ 2 6 0 , 6 4 8 $ 2 7 3 , 7 4 7 $ 1 3 , 0 9 9   5. 0 3 % 21 0 0  OF F I C E  SU P P L I E S $6 1 2 $ 1 , 3 0 0 $ 1 , 3 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 23 1 8  CO M P U T E R  SU P P L I E S $0 $1 , 4 0 0 $0 ($ 1 , 4 0 0 ) ‐10 0 . 0 0 % 23 5 0  SU P P L I E S  & MA T E R I A L S $3 6 2 $4 0 0 $4 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % SU P P L I E S $9 7 4 $ 3 , 1 0 0 $ 1 , 7 0 0 ( $ 1 , 4 0 0 ) ‐45 . 1 6 % 30 1 0  PO S T A G E $3 , 1 8 8 $ 2 , 1 1 8 $ 4 , 4 0 0 $ 2 , 2 8 2   10 7 . 7 4 % 30 6 0  PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $2 2 , 0 5 3 $ 2 5 , 7 9 0 $ 2 5 , 7 9 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 30 6 3  PR O G R A M M I N G / M A I N T E N A N C E $2 , 3 7 3 $ 1 8 , 5 4 3 $ 1 8 , 5 4 3 $0   0. 0 0 % 31 1 3  PR I N T I N G $3 , 0 8 7 $ 2 , 5 7 0 $ 3 , 1 7 0 $6 0 0   23 . 3 5 % PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $3 0 , 7 0 1 $ 4 9 , 0 2 1 $ 5 1 , 9 0 3 $ 2 , 8 8 2   5. 8 8 % 41 1 0  HE A T , L I G H T , W A T E R  UT I L $3 , 2 2 6 $ 3 , 5 2 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 ( $ 5 2 0 ) ‐14 . 7 7 % 41 2 0  TE L E P H O N E  SE R V I C E $4 , 0 9 8 $ 4 , 6 5 6 $ 4 , 4 0 1 ( $ 2 5 5 ) ‐5. 4 8 % UT I L I T I E S $7 , 3 2 4 $ 8 , 1 7 6 $ 7 , 4 0 1 ( $ 7 7 5 ) ‐9. 4 8 % 55 0 6  IN S U R A N C E ‐GE N E R A L  LI A B I L I T Y $5 1 4 $1 8 5 $1 8 5 $0   0. 0 0 % IN S U R A N C E $5 1 4 $1 8 5 $1 8 5 $0   0. 0 0 % 62 0 0  EQ U I P  RE P A I R S / N O N  VE H I C L E $2 9 7 $5 0 0 $8 5 0 $3 5 0   70 . 0 0 % OU T S I D E  SE R V I C E S $2 9 7 $5 0 0 $8 5 0 $3 5 0   70 . 0 0 % 71 5 0  DU E S  & SU B S C R I P T I O N S $0 $1 4 0 $1 4 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 71 7 0  TR A V E L  EX P E N S E $3 , 5 5 8 $ 6 , 7 5 0 $ 3 , 5 0 0 ( $ 3 , 2 5 0 ) ‐48 . 1 5 % 72 0 1  CO M P U T E R  EQ U I P M E N T  BE L O W  $5 0 0 0 $4 , 2 8 2 $5 0 0 $5 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 01 - 1 0 C O U R T 11 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 01 ‐10  CO U R T LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 72 2 1  OT H E R  EX P E N S E $1 0 4 $2 0 0 $2 8 0 $8 0   40 . 0 0 % 72 4 0  TU I T I O N  & TR A I N I N G $1 , 5 6 0 $ 2 , 5 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 ( $ 1 , 0 0 0 ) ‐40 . 0 0 % OT H E R $9 , 5 0 4 $ 1 0 , 0 9 0 $ 5 , 9 2 0 ( $ 4 , 1 7 0 ) ‐41 . 3 3 % 92 0 1  MI C R O  CO M P U T E R  EQ U I P M E N T $0 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! CA P I T A L  EX P E N D I T U R E S $0 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! TO T A L  CO U R T $3 1 0 , 2 9 7 $ 3 3 1 , 7 2 0 $ 3 4 1 , 7 0 6 $ 9 , 9 8 6   3. 0 1 % 01 - 1 0 C O U R T 12 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 01 ‐11  GE N E R A L  FU N D  RE V E N U E S LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 30 0 0  TA X E S ‐CU R R E N T  YE A R $1 5 , 7 8 6 , 2 4 1   $1 5 , 5 0 4 , 3 4 2   $1 5 , 5 5 8 , 1 8 4   $5 3 , 8 4 2   0. 3 5 % SU B T O T A L  CU R R E N T  TA X E S $1 5 , 7 8 6 , 2 4 1   $1 5 , 5 0 4 , 3 4 2   $1 5 , 5 5 8 , 1 8 4   $5 3 , 8 4 2   0. 3 5 % 30 4 7  DE L I N Q U E N T  TA X E S ‐19 9 7 $9 8 3   $0   $0   $0   #D I V / 0 ! 30 4 8  DE L I N Q U E N T  TA X E S ‐19 9 8 $1 , 2 3 4   $0   $0   $0   #D I V / 0 ! 30 4 9  DE L I N Q U E N T  TA X E S ‐19 9 9 $9 7 6   $5 0 0   $0   ($ 5 0 0 ) ‐10 0 . 0 0 % 30 5 0  DE L I N Q U E N T  TA X E S ‐20 0 0 $1 , 0 0 0   $5 0 0   $5 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 30 5 1  DE L I N Q U E N T  TA X E S ‐20 0 1 $1 , 0 2 1   $5 0 0   $5 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 30 5 2  DE L I N Q U E N T  TA X E S ‐20 0 2 $1 , 1 0 8   $5 0 0   $5 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 30 5 3  DE L I N Q U E N T  TA X E S ‐20 0 3 $1 , 1 6 0   $5 0 0   $5 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 30 5 4  DE L I N Q U E N T  TA X E S ‐20 0 4 $1 , 0 5 5   $5 0 0   $5 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 30 5 5  DE L I N Q U E N T  TA X E S ‐20 0 5 $1 , 8 3 4   $1 , 0 0 0   $5 0 0   ($ 5 0 0 ) ‐50 . 0 0 % 30 5 6  DE L I N Q U E N T  TA X E S ‐20 0 6 $4 , 2 9 1   $2 , 5 0 0   $1 , 0 0 0   ($ 1 , 5 0 0 ) ‐60 . 0 0 % 30 5 7  DE L I N Q U E N T  TA X E S ‐20 0 7 $7 , 1 5 3   $2 , 5 0 0   $2 , 5 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 30 5 8  DE L I N Q U E N T  TA X E S ‐20 0 8 $1 2 , 3 7 2   $5 , 0 0 0   $2 , 5 0 0   ($ 2 , 5 0 0 ) ‐50 . 0 0 % 30 5 9  DE L I N Q U E N T  TA X E S ‐20 0 9 $2 4 , 1 3 1   $1 0 , 0 0 0   $5 , 0 0 0   ($ 5 , 0 0 0 ) ‐50 . 0 0 % 30 4 5 . 2 0 1 0  DE L I N Q U E N T  TA X E S ‐20 1 0 $0   $7 5 , 0 0 0   $1 0 , 0 0 0   ($ 6 5 , 0 0 0 ) ‐86 . 6 7 % 30 4 5 . 2 0 1 1  DE L I N Q U E N T  TA X E S ‐20 1 1 $0   $0   $7 5 , 0 0 0   $7 5 , 0 0 0   #D I V / 0 ! 30 9 3  DE L I N Q U E N T  TA X E S ‐19 9 3 $4 0 2   $0   $0   $0   #D I V / 0 ! 30 9 4  DE L I N Q U E N T  TA X E S ‐19 9 4 $0   $0   $0   $0   #D I V / 0 ! 30 9 5  DE L I N Q U E N T  TA X E S ‐19 9 5 $0   $0   $0   $0   #D I V / 0 ! 30 9 6  DE L I N Q U E N T  TA X E S ‐19 9 6 $1 1 5   $0   $0   $0   #D I V / 0 ! SU B T O T A L  DE L I N Q U E N T  TA X E S $5 8 , 8 3 5   $9 9 , 0 0 0   $9 9 , 0 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 30 9 8  PE N A L T Y / I N T E R E S T  ON  TA X E S $9 7 , 6 5 5   $1 1 0 , 0 0 0   $1 1 0 , 0 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 30 9 9  AT T O R N E Y  FE E S ‐TA X E S $2 1 , 8 7 2   $3 5 , 0 0 0   $3 5 , 0 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % SU B T O T A L  PE N A L T Y  AN D  IN T E R E S T $1 1 9 , 5 2 7   $1 4 5 , 0 0 0   $1 4 5 , 0 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 31 0 9  UT I L I T Y  FU N D  CO N T R I B U T I O N $6 0 0 , 0 0 0   $6 0 0 , 0 0 0   $6 0 0 , 0 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % SU B T O T A L  UF  CO N T R I B U T I O N $6 0 0 , 0 0 0   $6 0 0 , 0 0 0   $6 0 0 , 0 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 31 5 0  CI T Y  SA L E S  TA X $3 , 4 7 9 , 6 2 9   $3 , 1 7 8 , 8 5 1   $3 , 3 3 8 , 0 0 0   $1 5 9 , 1 4 9   5. 0 1 % SU B T O T A L  SA L E S  TA X $3 , 4 7 9 , 6 2 9   $3 , 1 7 8 , 8 5 1   $3 , 3 3 8 , 0 0 0   $1 5 9 , 1 4 9   5. 0 1 % 01 - 1 1 G F R E V E N U E S 13 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 01 ‐11  GE N E R A L  FU N D  RE V E N U E S LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 33 0 0  BU I L D I N G  PE R M I T S $2 , 8 4 6 , 1 2 5   $1 , 4 0 0 , 0 0 0   $1 , 4 0 0 , 0 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % SU B T O T A L  BU I L D I N G  PE R M I T S $2 , 8 4 6 , 1 2 5   $1 , 4 0 0 , 0 0 0   $1 , 4 0 0 , 0 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 34 9 9  DI R E C T  AL A R M  RE V E N U E $7 9 9 , 8 8 4   $8 1 9 , 0 0 0   $8 6 6 , 9 8 9   $4 7 , 9 8 9   5. 8 6 % SU B T O T A L  DI R E C T  AL A R M $7 9 9 , 8 8 4   $8 1 9 , 0 0 0   $8 6 6 , 9 8 9   $4 7 , 9 8 9   5. 8 6 % 32 0 0  T U EL E C T R I C $1 , 1 6 3 , 3 8 3   $1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0   $1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 32 0 2  TE L E P H O N E  FR A N C H I S E $2 1 1 , 0 3 1   $3 0 0 , 0 0 0   $3 0 0 , 0 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 32 0 3  LO N E  ST A R  GA S $4 6 9 , 9 1 6   $4 0 0 , 0 0 0   $4 0 0 , 0 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 32 0 4  CA B L E  FR A N C H I S E $3 6 2 , 9 7 3   $2 1 0 , 0 0 0   $3 5 0 , 0 0 0   $1 4 0 , 0 0 0   66 . 6 7 % SU B T O T A L  FR A N C H I S E  FE E S $2 , 2 0 7 , 3 0 3   $1 , 9 1 0 , 0 0 0   $2 , 0 5 0 , 0 0 0   $1 4 0 , 0 0 0   7. 3 3 % 34 0 0  TR A F F I C  FI N E S $3 0 4 , 3 5 9   $3 4 6 , 0 0 0   $3 4 6 , 0 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 34 0 3  CR O S S ' G  GU A R D ( C H I L D  SF T Y ) $1 6 , 2 2 7   $1 5 , 0 0 0   $1 5 , 0 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 34 0 4  PA R K I N G  TI C K E T S $1 3 8 , 1 3 5   $1 7 0 , 0 0 0   $1 9 5 , 0 0 0   $2 5 , 0 0 0   14 . 7 1 % SU B T O T A L  FI N E S $4 5 8 , 7 2 1   $5 3 1 , 0 0 0   $5 5 6 , 0 0 0   $2 5 , 0 0 0   4. 7 1 % 33 0 2  CO N T R A C T O R S  LI C N S E / P E R M I T $2 4 , 7 3 5   $4 0 , 0 0 0   $4 0 , 0 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 33 0 3  AN I M A L  CO N T R O L  TA G S / F E E S $1 6 , 1 7 3   $1 5 , 0 0 0   $1 5 , 0 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 33 0 4  HE A L T H / F O O D  PE R M I T $3 4 , 2 1 0   $2 0 , 0 0 0   $2 0 , 0 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 33 0 5  FI L M I N G  PE R M I T S $2 , 2 8 2   $2 , 0 0 0   $2 , 0 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 33 0 6  FI R E  PE R M I T S / R E V E N U E $2 8 , 3 8 9   $2 5 , 0 0 0   $2 5 , 0 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 33 0 8  PO L I C E  RE V E N U E $8 7 , 0 9 8   $9 7 , 9 1 1   $4 4 , 9 1 1   ($ 5 3 , 0 0 0 ) ‐54 . 1 3 % 34 0 1  WR E C K E R  FE E S $1 , 6 0 8   $2 , 1 6 0   $2 , 1 6 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 34 0 5  AL A R M  BI L L I N G $7 7 , 6 8 0   $1 3 5 , 9 8 4   $1 3 5 , 9 8 4   $0   0. 0 0 % 34 0 6  FA L S E  AL A R M  FE E S $8 0 0   $1 0 , 0 0 0   $1 0 , 0 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 34 0 8  AM B U L A N C E  FE E S $2 9 6 , 3 0 2   $4 4 4 , 6 7 5   $3 0 0 , 0 0 0   ($ 1 4 4 , 6 7 5 ) ‐32 . 5 3 % 34 0 9  91 1  SE R V I C E  FE E S $8 8 , 3 2 2   $1 0 9 , 0 0 0   $1 0 9 , 0 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 34 1 0  91 1  SE R V I C E  FE E S ‐WI R E L E S S $1 1 6 , 6 2 8   $1 1 1 , 0 0 0   $1 1 1 , 0 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 34 1 1  CA P I A S  WA R R A N T  RE V E N U E $1 , 6 0 8   $0   $0   $0   #D I V / 0 ! 34 1 2  RE D  LI G H T  CA M E R A  RE V E N U E $0   $0   $2 0 , 0 0 0   $2 0 , 0 0 0   #D I V / 0 ! 35 3 5  UT I L I T Y  CA P  OF F $1 4 , 9 0 0   $3 0 , 0 0 0   $3 0 , 0 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % SU B T O T A L  SE R V I C E  CH A R G E S $7 9 0 , 7 3 5   $1 , 0 4 2 , 7 3 0   $8 6 5 , 0 5 5   ($ 1 7 7 , 6 7 5 ) ‐17 . 0 4 % 01 - 1 1 G F R E V E N U E S 14 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 01 ‐11  GE N E R A L  FU N D  RE V E N U E S LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 39 0 0  IN T E R E S T  EA R N I N G S $2 0 2 , 1 2 0   $2 6 5 , 0 0 0   $2 6 5 , 0 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % SU B T O T A L  IN T E R E S T  EA R N I N G S $2 0 2 , 1 2 0   $2 6 5 , 0 0 0   $2 6 5 , 0 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 31 5 5  MI X E D  BE V E R A G E  TA X $1 0 5 , 1 7 5   $1 0 8 , 0 0 0   $8 8 , 0 0 0   ($ 2 0 , 0 0 0 ) ‐18 . 5 2 % 35 1 0  TE N N I S  PE R M I T S $5 0 , 0 4 8   $2 4 , 0 0 0   $2 4 , 0 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 35 1 1  SW I M  PO O L  PE R M I T ‐RE S I D E N T $1 7 7 , 6 8 5   $1 6 5 , 0 0 0   $1 6 5 , 0 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 35 1 2  SW I M  PO O L  PE R M I T ‐NO N R E S $9 , 7 8 0   $7 , 0 0 0   $7 , 0 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 35 1 3  SW I M  PO O L  PR M T S  GA T E  RC P T $1 1 7 , 3 9 0   $1 0 0 , 0 0 0   $1 0 0 , 0 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 35 1 4  SW I M M I N G  PO O L  CO N C E S S I O N S $8 , 0 0 0   $6 , 0 0 0   $6 , 0 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 35 1 5  SW I M  LE S S O N S $1 , 5 0 0   $2 , 0 0 0   $2 , 0 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 37 3 0  PU B L I C  SA F E T Y  GR A N T S / R E V $0   $0   $0   $0   #D I V / 0 ! 37 4 0  PO L I C E  GR A N T S / D O N A T I O N S $0   $1 0 , 0 0 0   $1 0 , 0 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 37 4 5  FI R E  GR A N T S / D O N A T I O N S $1 2 , 8 9 4   $5 , 0 0 0   $5 , 0 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 38 5 0  AU C T I O N / S A L E  OF  EQ U I P M E N T $2 4 , 7 5 1   $2 1 , 0 0 0   $2 1 , 0 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 39 0 1  RE N T $4 5 , 8 7 5   $4 0 , 0 0 0   $4 0 , 0 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 39 1 1  CO P I E S $1 , 3 9 2   $4 , 0 0 0   $4 , 0 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 39 2 0  PA Y M E N T  IN  LI E U  OF  TA X E S $3 7 5 , 0 0 0   $0   $3 0 0 , 0 0 0   $3 0 0 , 0 0 0   #D I V / 0 ! 39 9 9  OT H E R  RE V E N U E $1 , 4 4 1 , 4 3 7   $7 7 1 , 0 7 7   $7 7 1 , 0 7 7   $0   0. 0 0 % SU B T O T A L  OT H E R  RE V E N U E $2 , 3 7 0 , 9 2 7   $1 , 2 6 3 , 0 7 7   $1 , 5 4 3 , 0 7 7   $2 8 0 , 0 0 0   22 . 1 7 % TO T A L  RE V E N U E S  ‐   GE N E R A L  FU N D $2 9 , 7 2 0 , 0 4 7   $2 6 , 7 5 8 , 0 0 0   $2 7 , 2 8 6 , 3 0 5   $5 2 8 , 3 0 5   1. 9 7 % 01 - 1 1 G F R E V E N U E S 15 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 01 ‐19  CO M M U N I T Y  DE V E L O P M E N T LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 10 0 1  RE G U L A R  EA R N I N G S $7 0 2 , 8 8 2 $ 7 1 0 , 6 2 9 $ 7 9 9 , 0 7 4 $ 8 8 , 4 4 5   12 . 4 5 % 10 0 2  OV E R T I M E  EA R N I N G S ($ 8 6 ) $5 2 7 $0 ( $ 5 2 7 ) ‐10 0 . 0 0 % 10 0 5  LO N G E V I T Y  PA Y $4 , 4 9 9 $ 4 , 8 5 9 $ 4 , 8 3 9 ($ 2 0 ) ‐0. 4 1 % 10 0 7  CA R  AL L O W A N C E $7 , 2 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 10 0 9  CE L L  PH O N E  AL L O W A N C E $3 6 0 $3 6 0 $9 6 0 $6 0 0   16 6 . 6 7 % 11 1 0  EM P L O Y E R S  SH A R E  F. I . C . A . $5 3 , 2 8 4 $ 5 4 , 4 2 3 $ 6 1 , 0 0 6 $ 6 , 5 8 3   12 . 1 0 % 11 2 0  EM P L O Y E R S  SH A R E  T. M . R . S . $9 8 , 4 9 5 $ 7 5 , 9 7 6 $ 6 5 , 0 7 6 ( $ 1 0 , 9 0 0 ) ‐14 . 3 5 % 11 3 0  IN S U R A N C E ‐EM P L O Y E E  LI F E $4 , 4 9 0 $ 4 , 7 0 9 $ 4 , 9 2 8 $2 1 9   4. 6 5 % 11 3 1  IN S U R A N C E ‐WO R K M E N S  CO M P $1 , 4 1 6 $ 1 , 4 4 9 $ 1 , 3 9 4 ($ 5 5 ) ‐3. 8 0 % 11 3 5  HE A L T H  IN S U R A N C E $8 1 , 0 0 0 $7 2 , 0 0 0 $9 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 8 , 0 0 0   25 . 0 0 % SA L A R I E S  & BE N E F I T S $9 5 3 , 5 4 0 $ 9 3 2 , 1 3 2 $ 1 , 0 3 4 , 4 7 7 $ 1 0 2 , 3 4 5   10 . 9 8 % 20 2 9  CL O T H I N G  AL L O W A N C E $1 , 1 8 7 $ 1 , 3 2 0 $ 1 , 5 0 5 $1 8 5   14 . 0 2 % 21 0 0  OF F I C E  SU P P L I E S $2 , 7 4 9 $ 4 , 0 0 0 $ 4 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 23 1 8  CO M P U T E R  SU P P L I E S $0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 23 2 0  GA S ,  OI L  & GR E A S E $4 , 0 8 1 $ 4 , 9 9 2 $ 4 , 9 9 2 $0   0. 0 0 % 23 5 0  SU P P L I E S  & MA T E R I A L S $1 , 2 3 7 $ 1 , 5 0 0 $ 2 , 2 5 0 $7 5 0   50 . 0 0 % SU P P L I E S $9 , 2 5 4 $ 1 2 , 8 1 2 $ 1 3 , 7 4 7 $9 3 5   7. 3 0 % 30 0 3  BO A R D  ME E T I N G S $1 , 0 3 4 $ 1 , 5 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 30 1 0  PO S T A G E $1 , 3 8 3 $ 1 , 3 3 4 $ 4 , 8 0 0 $ 3 , 4 6 6   25 9 . 8 2 % 30 1 4  PU B L I C A T I O N S $3 9 7 $5 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0   20 0 . 0 0 % 30 6 0  PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $1 , 0 5 4 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 30 6 3  PR O G R A M M I N G / M A I N T E N A N C E $1 8 , 9 8 6 $ 1 2 , 9 8 7 $ 3 4 , 0 3 2 $ 2 1 , 0 4 5   16 2 . 0 5 % 31 1 3  PR I N T I N G $4 0 0 $5 0 0 $5 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $2 3 , 2 5 4 $ 1 7 , 8 2 1 $ 4 3 , 3 3 2 $ 2 5 , 5 1 1   14 3 . 1 5 % 41 1 0  HE A T , L I G H T , W A T E R  UT I L $4 , 9 2 7 $ 5 , 3 1 2 $ 4 , 8 0 0 ( $ 5 1 2 ) ‐9. 6 4 % 41 2 0  TE L E P H O N E  SE R V I C E $9 , 8 1 8 $ 7 , 1 2 2 $ 1 0 , 8 4 7 $ 3 , 7 2 5   52 . 3 0 % UT I L I T I E S $1 4 , 7 4 5 $ 1 2 , 4 3 4 $ 1 5 , 6 4 7 $ 3 , 2 1 3   25 . 8 4 % 55 0 0  IN S U R A N C E ‐AU T O  LI A B I L I T Y $1 3 2 $1 2 2 $1 2 2 $0   0. 0 0 % 55 0 6  IN S U R A N C E ‐GE N E R A L  LI A B I L I T Y $8 7 1 $3 1 4 $3 1 4 $0   0. 0 0 % IN S U R A N C E $1 , 0 0 3 $4 3 6 $4 3 6 $0   0. 0 0 % 01 - 1 9 C O M M U N I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T 16 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 01 ‐19  CO M M U N I T Y  DE V E L O P M E N T LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 61 9 0  AU T O  RE P A I R S $1 , 0 3 7 $ 2 , 0 6 0 $ 2 , 0 6 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 61 9 5  EQ U I P M E N T  MA I N T E N A N C E $6 , 7 1 9 $ 1 5 , 8 9 9 $ 1 5 , 8 9 9 $0   0. 0 0 % 62 0 0  EQ U I P  RE P A I R S / N O N  VE H I C L E $0 $3 0 0 $3 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % OU T S I D E  SE R V I C E S $7 , 7 5 6 $ 1 8 , 2 5 9 $ 1 8 , 2 5 9 $0   0. 0 0 % 71 5 0  DU E S  & SU B S C R I P T I O N S $3 , 5 0 3 $ 3 , 0 9 5 $ 2 , 6 6 5 ( $ 4 3 0 ) ‐13 . 8 9 % 71 7 0  TR A V E L  EX P E N S E $1 , 2 1 0 $ 4 , 9 8 5 $ 4 , 9 1 0 ($ 7 5 ) ‐1. 5 0 % 72 0 1  CO M P U T E R  EQ U I P M E N T  BE L O W  $5 0 0 0 $1 3 4 $ 2 , 2 2 7 $ 5 , 5 0 0 $ 3 , 2 7 3   14 6 . 9 7 % 72 0 2  MI C R O  CO M P U T E R  SO F T W A R E $0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 72 2 1  OT H E R  EX P E N S E $2 , 8 3 8 $ 3 , 5 0 0 $ 4 , 5 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0   28 . 5 7 % 72 4 0  TU I T I O N  & TR A I N I N G $2 , 9 6 6 $ 5 , 5 3 1 $ 6 , 4 1 3 $8 8 2   15 . 9 5 % 72 4 5  TU I T I O N  RE I M B U R S E M E N T $9 4 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! OT H E R $1 0 , 7 4 5 $ 2 0 , 8 3 8 $ 2 5 , 4 8 8 $ 4 , 6 5 0   22 . 3 2 % 90 0 0  CA P I T A L  EQ U I P M E N T  RE P L A C E $2 , 9 8 1 $ 2 , 1 6 7 $ 4 , 2 0 9 $ 2 , 0 4 2   94 . 2 3 % CA P I T A L  EX P E N D I T U R E S $2 , 9 8 1 $ 2 , 1 6 7 $ 4 , 2 0 9 $ 2 , 0 4 2   94 . 2 3 % TO T A L  CO M M U N I T Y  DE V E L O P M E N T $1 , 0 2 3 , 2 7 8 $ 1 , 0 1 6 , 8 9 9 $ 1 , 1 5 5 , 5 9 5 $ 1 3 8 , 6 9 6   13 . 6 4 % 01 - 1 9 C O M M U N I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T 17 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 01 ‐20  EN G I N E E R I N G LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 10 0 1  RE G U L A R  EA R N I N G S $4 9 6 , 9 4 3 $ 4 9 5 , 2 7 6 $ 5 1 2 , 0 5 7 $ 1 6 , 7 8 1   3. 3 9 % 10 0 2  OV E R T I M E  EA R N I N G S ($ 1 , 4 1 8 ) $ 2 , 1 4 6 $ 1 , 6 9 8 ( $ 4 4 8 ) ‐20 . 8 8 % 10 0 5  LO N G E V I T Y  PA Y $4 , 4 6 5 $ 4 , 6 8 3 $ 4 , 9 1 9 $2 3 6   5. 0 4 % 10 0 7  CA R  AL L O W A N C E $1 4 , 4 0 0 $ 1 4 , 4 0 0 $ 1 4 , 4 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 10 0 9  CE L L  PH O N E  AL L O W A N C E $0 $0 $3 6 0 $3 6 0   #D I V / 0 ! 11 1 0  EM P L O Y E R S  SH A R E  F. I . C . A . $3 3 , 9 6 2 $ 3 4 , 3 6 2 $ 3 5 , 4 6 3 $ 1 , 1 0 1   3. 2 0 % 11 2 0  EM P L O Y E R S  SH A R E  T. M . R . S . $7 1 , 7 3 1 $ 5 4 , 2 3 3 $ 4 4 , 0 6 2 ( $ 1 0 , 1 7 1 ) ‐18 . 7 5 % 11 3 0  IN S U R A N C E ‐EM P L O Y E E  LI F E $3 , 3 6 1 $ 3 , 8 4 7 $ 3 , 4 1 6 ( $ 4 3 1 ) ‐11 . 2 0 % 11 3 1  IN S U R A N C E ‐WO R K M E N S  CO M P $1 , 1 8 1 $9 4 5 $7 9 1 ( $ 1 5 4 ) ‐16 . 3 0 % 11 3 5  HE A L T H  IN S U R A N C E $4 5 , 0 0 0 $4 5 , 0 0 0 $4 5 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % SA L A R I E S  & BE N E F I T S $6 6 9 , 6 2 5 $ 6 5 4 , 8 9 2 $ 6 6 2 , 1 6 6 $ 7 , 2 7 4   1. 1 1 % 20 2 9  CL O T H I N G  AL L O W A N C E $1 , 5 4 4 $ 1 , 3 5 0 $ 1 , 3 5 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 21 0 0  OF F I C E  SU P P L I E S $1 , 2 4 7 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 23 1 8  CO M P U T E R  SU P P L I E S $1 , 5 0 1 $ 3 , 5 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 ( $ 2 , 0 0 0 ) ‐57 . 1 4 % 23 2 0  GA S ,  OI L  & GR E A S E $2 , 7 7 9 $ 3 , 4 7 4 $ 3 , 4 7 4 $0   0. 0 0 % 23 5 0  SU P P L I E S  & MA T E R I A L S $2 , 7 5 0 $ 2 , 5 0 0 $ 2 , 5 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % SU P P L I E S $9 , 8 2 1 $ 1 1 , 8 2 4 $ 9 , 8 2 4 ( $ 2 , 0 0 0 ) ‐16 . 9 1 % 30 1 0  PO S T A G E $6 7 $9 7 $9 7 $0   0. 0 0 % 30 6 0  PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $2 4 , 4 1 2 $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 30 6 3  PR O G R A M M I N G / M A I N T E N A N C E $1 9 , 6 4 3 $ 1 9 , 7 7 6 $ 2 0 , 9 5 0 $ 1 , 1 7 4   5. 9 4 % 31 1 3  PR I N T I N G $3 3 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $4 4 , 1 5 5 $ 3 5 , 8 7 3 $ 3 7 , 0 4 7 $ 1 , 1 7 4   3. 2 7 % 41 1 0  HE A T , L I G H T , W A T E R  UT I L $4 , 3 8 1 $ 4 , 8 3 5 $ 4 , 3 0 0 ( $ 5 3 5 ) ‐11 . 0 7 % 41 2 0  TE L E P H O N E  SE R V I C E $1 1 , 6 4 2 $ 1 3 , 1 0 5 $ 1 0 , 8 3 4 ( $ 2 , 2 7 1 ) ‐17 . 3 3 % UT I L I T I E S $1 6 , 0 2 3 $ 1 7 , 9 4 0 $ 1 5 , 1 3 4 ( $ 2 , 8 0 6 ) ‐15 . 6 4 % 55 0 0  IN S U R A N C E ‐AU T O  LI A B I L I T Y $2 9 8 $2 7 5 $2 7 5 $0   0. 0 0 % 55 0 6  IN S U R A N C E ‐GE N E R A L  LI A B I L I T Y $1 , 0 9 1 $3 9 3 $3 9 3 $0   0. 0 0 % IN S U R A N C E $1 , 3 8 9 $6 6 8 $6 6 8 $0   0. 0 0 % 61 9 0  AU T O  RE P A I R S $1 , 6 9 3 $ 1 , 9 6 8 $ 1 , 9 6 8 $0   0. 0 0 % 01 - 2 0 E N G I N E E R I N G 18 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 01 ‐20  EN G I N E E R I N G LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 61 9 5  EQ U I P M E N T  MA I N T E N A N C E $7 , 0 3 3 $ 8 , 3 8 4 $ 8 , 3 8 4 $0   0. 0 0 % 62 0 0  EQ U I P  RE P A I R S / N O N  VE H I C L E $5 6 7 $ 1 , 5 0 0 $5 0 0 ( $ 1 , 0 0 0 ) ‐66 . 6 7 % OU T S I D E  SE R V I C E S $9 , 2 9 3 $ 1 1 , 8 5 2 $ 1 0 , 8 5 2 ( $ 1 , 0 0 0 ) ‐8. 4 4 % 71 5 0  DU E S  & SU B S C R I P T I O N S $1 , 2 2 8 $9 9 0 $9 9 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 71 7 0  TR A V E L  EX P E N S E $1 , 2 5 2 $ 1 , 7 8 0 $ 1 , 7 8 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 72 0 1  CO M P U T E R  EQ U I P M E N T  BE L O W  $5 0 0 0 $2 , 7 4 0 $5 0 0 $ 6 , 3 0 0 $ 5 , 8 0 0   11 6 0 . 0 0 % 72 0 2  MI C R O  CO M P U T E R  SO F T W A R E $1 7 , 1 3 9 $5 0 0 $5 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 72 4 0  TU I T I O N  & TR A I N I N G $9 4 4 $ 3 , 7 1 0 $ 1 , 7 1 0 ( $ 2 , 0 0 0 ) ‐53 . 9 1 % OT H E R $2 3 , 3 0 3 $ 7 , 4 8 0 $ 1 1 , 2 8 0 $ 3 , 8 0 0   50 . 8 0 % 90 0 0  CA P I T A L  EQ U I P M E N T  RE P L A C E $4 , 3 2 9 $ 3 , 6 8 3 $ 3 , 5 3 4 ( $ 1 4 9 ) ‐4. 0 5 % CA P I T A L  EX P E N D I T U R E S $4 , 3 2 9 $ 3 , 6 8 3 $ 3 , 5 3 4 ( $ 1 4 9 ) ‐4. 0 5 % TO T A L  EN G I N E E R I N G $7 7 7 , 9 3 8 $ 7 4 4 , 2 1 2 $ 7 5 0 , 5 0 5 $ 6 , 2 9 3   0. 8 5 % 01 - 2 0 E N G I N E E R I N G 19 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 01 ‐25  TR A F F I C  CO N T R O L LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 10 0 1  RE G U L A R  EA R N I N G S $3 7 6 , 7 6 5 $ 3 8 6 , 2 1 3 $ 4 0 1 , 8 1 0 $ 1 5 , 5 9 7   4. 0 4 % 10 0 2  OV E R T I M E  EA R N I N G S $2 , 6 9 7 $ 3 , 2 8 6 $ 3 , 7 5 7 $4 7 1   14 . 3 3 % 10 0 5  LO N G E V I T Y  PA Y $4 , 0 1 1 $ 4 , 1 5 2 $ 4 , 4 8 8 $3 3 6   8. 0 9 % 11 1 0  EM P L O Y E R S  SH A R E  F. I . C . A . $2 8 , 3 2 9 $ 3 0 , 1 1 5 $ 3 1 , 3 6 8 $ 1 , 2 5 3   4. 1 6 % 11 2 0  EM P L O Y E R S  SH A R E  T. M . R . S . $5 3 , 0 9 4 $ 4 1 , 3 3 4 $ 3 3 , 8 7 2 ( $ 7 , 4 6 2 ) ‐18 . 0 5 % 11 3 0  IN S U R A N C E ‐EM P L O Y E E  LI F E $2 , 2 2 4 $ 2 , 5 6 2 $ 2 , 6 8 1 $1 1 9   4. 6 4 % 11 3 1  IN S U R A N C E ‐WO R K M E N S  CO M P $6 , 3 8 5 $ 7 , 0 1 2 $ 5 , 7 8 0 ( $ 1 , 2 3 2 ) ‐17 . 5 7 % 11 3 5  HE A L T H  IN S U R A N C E $6 3 , 0 0 0 $ 6 3 , 0 0 0 $ 6 3 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % SA L A R I E S  & BE N E F I T S $5 3 6 , 5 0 5 $ 5 3 7 , 6 7 4 $ 5 4 6 , 7 5 6 $ 9 , 0 8 2   1. 6 9 % 20 2 9  CL O T H I N G  AL L O W A N C E $3 , 2 0 6 $ 3 , 4 2 0 $ 3 , 4 2 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 21 0 0  OF F I C E  SU P P L I E S $4 2 7 $1 , 0 0 0 $1 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 23 2 0  GA S ,  OI L  & GR E A S E $8 , 3 9 0 $ 7 , 7 8 5 $ 7 , 7 8 5 $0   0. 0 0 % 23 5 0  SU P P L I E S  & MA T E R I A L S $5 7 , 8 9 5 $ 9 4 , 9 0 0 $ 9 3 , 3 2 0 ( $ 1 , 5 8 0 ) ‐1. 6 6 % 23 6 0  SM A L L  TO O L S $0 $2 5 0 $2 5 0 $0   0. 0 0 % SU P P L I E S $6 9 , 9 1 8 $ 1 0 7 , 3 5 5 $ 1 0 5 , 7 7 5 ( $ 1 , 5 8 0 ) ‐1. 4 7 % 30 1 0  PO S T A G E $1 $8 $5 ($ 3 ) ‐37 . 5 0 % 30 6 0  PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $2 0 , 3 4 0 $ 2 4 , 0 0 0 $ 2 2 , 0 0 0 ( $ 2 , 0 0 0 ) ‐8. 3 3 % 31 1 3  PR I N T I N G $0 $ 2 , 0 3 5 $ 2 , 0 3 5 $0   0. 0 0 % 31 1 5  CO N T R A C T  MA I N T E N A N C E $5 , 4 1 8 $ 8 , 1 8 2 $ 6 , 2 2 3 ( $ 1 , 9 5 9 ) ‐23 . 9 4 % PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $2 5 , 7 5 9 $ 3 4 , 2 2 5 $ 3 0 , 2 6 3 ( $ 3 , 9 6 2 ) ‐11 . 5 8 % 41 1 0  HE A T , L I G H T , W A T E R  UT I L $3 7 , 8 4 5 $ 4 1 , 4 6 9 $ 5 2 , 0 0 0 $ 1 0 , 5 3 1   25 . 3 9 % 41 2 0  TE L E P H O N E  SE R V I C E $3 , 0 0 5 $ 3 , 0 6 4 $ 3 , 1 3 6 $7 2   2. 3 5 % UT I L I T I E S $4 0 , 8 5 0 $ 4 4 , 5 3 3 $ 5 5 , 1 3 6 $ 1 0 , 6 0 3   23 . 8 1 % 55 0 0  IN S U R A N C E ‐AU T O  LI A B I L I T Y $1 , 4 9 3 $ 1 , 3 7 8 $ 1 , 3 7 8 $0   0. 0 0 % 55 0 6  IN S U R A N C E ‐GE N E R A L  LI A B I L I T Y $9 6 3 $3 4 7 $3 4 7 $0   0. 0 0 % IN S U R A N C E $2 , 4 5 6 $ 1 , 7 2 5 $ 1 , 7 2 5 $0   0. 0 0 % 61 9 0  AU T O  RE P A I R S $7 , 1 2 5 $ 5 , 0 8 4 $ 5 , 0 8 4 $0   0. 0 0 % 61 9 5  EQ U I P M E N T  MA I N T E N A N C E $3 4 , 6 4 1 $ 2 8 , 4 1 3 $ 2 8 , 4 1 3 $0   0. 0 0 % 63 5 0  SI G N A L  MA I N T . &  RE P $7 1 , 8 5 0 $ 6 7 , 0 0 0 $ 6 7 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 01 - 2 5 T R A F F I C C O N T R O L 20 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 01 ‐25  TR A F F I C  CO N T R O L LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % OU T S I D E  SE R V I C E S $1 1 3 , 6 1 6 $ 1 0 0 , 4 9 7 $ 1 0 0 , 4 9 7 $0   0. 0 0 % 71 5 0  DU E S  & SU B S C R I P T I O N S $4 8 0 $4 8 0 $5 6 0 $8 0   16 . 6 7 % 72 0 1  CO M P U T E R  EQ U I P M E N T  BE L O W  $5 0 0 0 $0 $ 1 , 3 6 5 $ 4 , 3 0 0 $ 2 , 9 3 5   21 5 . 0 2 % 72 0 2  MI C R O  CO M P U T E R  SO F T W A R E $0 $5 0 0 $5 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 72 2 1  OT H E R  EX P E N S E $2 , 3 8 5 $3 0 0 $3 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 72 4 0  TU I T I O N  & TR A I N I N G $2 , 3 2 5 $5 0 0 $0 ( $ 5 0 0 ) ‐10 0 . 0 0 % OT H E R $5 , 1 9 0 $ 3 , 1 4 5 $ 5 , 6 6 0 $ 2 , 5 1 5   79 . 9 7 % 90 0 0  CA P I T A L  EQ U I P M E N T  RE P L A C E $1 5 , 9 0 6 $ 1 9 , 7 8 0 $ 1 6 , 5 1 0 ( $ 3 , 2 7 0 ) ‐16 . 5 3 % CA P I T A L  EX P E N D I T U R E S $1 5 , 9 0 6 $ 1 9 , 7 8 0 $ 1 6 , 5 1 0 ( $ 3 , 2 7 0 ) ‐16 . 5 3 % TO T A L  TR A F F I C $8 1 0 , 2 0 0 $ 8 4 8 , 9 3 4 $ 8 6 2 , 3 2 2 $ 1 3 , 3 8 8   1. 5 8 % 01 - 2 5 T R A F F I C C O N T R O L 21 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 01 ‐35  FA C I L I T I E S  MA I N T E N A N C E LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 10 0 1  RE G U L A R  EA R N I N G S $1 9 8 , 2 5 9 $ 1 9 8 , 8 6 4 $ 1 0 9 , 0 2 8 ( $ 8 9 , 8 3 6 ) ‐45 . 1 7 % 10 0 5  LO N G E V I T Y  PA Y $2 , 3 1 1 $ 2 , 4 1 5 $ 1 , 2 9 8 ( $ 1 , 1 1 7 ) ‐46 . 2 5 % 10 0 7  CA R  AL L O W A N C E $7 , 2 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 $0 ( $ 7 , 2 0 0 ) ‐10 0 . 0 0 % 11 1 0  EM P L O Y E R S  SH A R E  F. I . C . A . $1 5 , 5 0 1 $ 1 5 , 9 4 8 $ 8 , 4 4 0 ( $ 7 , 5 0 8 ) ‐47 . 0 8 % 11 2 0  EM P L O Y E R S  SH A R E  T. M . R . S . $2 8 , 7 4 7 $ 2 1 , 8 9 0 $ 9 , 1 1 3 ( $ 1 2 , 7 7 7 ) ‐58 . 3 7 % 11 3 0  IN S U R A N C E ‐EM P L O Y E E  LI F E $1 , 6 6 9 $ 1 , 3 1 7 $7 2 7 ( $ 5 9 0 ) ‐44 . 8 0 % 11 3 1  IN S U R A N C E ‐WO R K M E N S  CO M P $1 , 0 1 3 $ 1 , 0 3 0 $7 3 3 ( $ 2 9 7 ) ‐28 . 8 3 % 11 3 5  HE A L T H  IN S U R A N C E $2 7 , 0 0 0 $ 2 7 , 0 0 0 $ 1 8 , 0 0 0 ( $ 9 , 0 0 0 ) ‐33 . 3 3 % SA L A R I E S  & BE N E F I T S $2 8 1 , 7 0 0 $ 2 7 5 , 6 6 4 $ 1 4 7 , 3 3 9 ( $ 1 2 8 , 3 2 5 ) ‐46 . 5 5 % 20 2 9  CL O T H I N G  AL L O W A N C E $3 6 6 $6 7 0 $6 7 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 21 0 0  OF F I C E  SU P P L I E S $3 9 0 $4 8 2 $3 9 0 ($ 9 2 ) ‐19 . 0 9 % 23 1 8  CO M P U T E R  SU P P L I E S $0 $2 6 1 $2 2 5 ($ 3 6 ) ‐13 . 7 9 % 23 2 0  GA S ,  OI L  & GR E A S E $2 , 8 5 6 $ 8 , 4 2 7 $ 3 , 4 2 7 ( $ 5 , 0 0 0 ) ‐59 . 3 3 % 23 5 0  SU P P L I E S  & MA T E R I A L S $5 , 1 4 5 $ 7 , 1 8 8 $ 4 , 6 5 1 ( $ 2 , 5 3 7 ) ‐35 . 2 9 % 23 6 0  SM A L L  TO O L S $0 $ 1 , 0 9 8 $ 1 , 0 9 8 $0   0. 0 0 % SU P P L I E S $8 , 7 5 7 $ 1 8 , 1 2 6 $ 1 0 , 4 6 1 ( $ 7 , 6 6 5 ) ‐42 . 2 9 % 30 1 0  PO S T A G E $1 $3 0 $5 ($ 2 5 ) ‐83 . 3 3 % 30 1 4  PU B L I C A T I O N S $0 $3 7 8 $3 7 8 $0   0. 0 0 % 30 6 0  PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $1 0 , 0 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 $0 ( $ 2 , 0 0 0 ) ‐10 0 . 0 0 % 31 1 3  PR I N T I N G $0 $2 0 0 $0 ( $ 2 0 0 ) ‐10 0 . 0 0 % 31 1 5  CO N T R A C T  MA I N T E N A N C E $7 5 , 5 9 9 $ 1 6 1 , 0 0 4 $ 1 3 7 , 6 4 2 ( $ 2 3 , 3 6 2 ) ‐14 . 5 1 % PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $8 5 , 6 0 0 $ 1 6 3 , 6 1 2 $ 1 3 8 , 0 2 5 ( $ 2 5 , 5 8 7 ) ‐15 . 6 4 % 41 1 0  HE A T , L I G H T , W A T E R  UT I L $1 1 8 , 9 0 0 $ 1 2 8 , 7 5 6 $ 1 2 0 , 0 0 0 ( $ 8 , 7 5 6 ) ‐6. 8 0 % 41 2 0  TE L E P H O N E  SE R V I C E $3 , 9 7 3 $ 4 , 3 2 6 $ 4 , 1 5 9 ( $ 1 6 7 ) ‐3. 8 6 % UT I L I T I E S $1 2 2 , 8 7 3 $ 1 3 3 , 0 8 2 $ 1 2 4 , 1 5 9 ( $ 8 , 9 2 3 ) ‐6. 7 0 % 55 0 0  IN S U R A N C E ‐AU T O  LI A B I L I T Y $1 , 8 8 7 $ 1 , 7 4 2 $ 1 , 7 4 2 $0   0. 0 0 % 55 0 6  IN S U R A N C E ‐GE N E R A L  LI A B I L I T Y $1 , 0 8 5 $3 9 1 $3 9 1 $0   0. 0 0 % 55 1 0  IN S U R A N C E ‐BL D G  & CO N T E N T S $2 6 , 6 7 2 $ 4 0 , 0 0 0 $ 4 0 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % IN S U R A N C E $2 9 , 6 4 4 $ 4 2 , 1 3 3 $ 4 2 , 1 3 3 $0   0. 0 0 % 01 - 3 5 F A C I L I T I E S M A I N T E N A N C E 22 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 01 ‐35  FA C I L I T I E S  MA I N T E N A N C E LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 61 8 4  SE C U R I T Y  EX P E N S E $3 , 0 9 0 $ 1 4 , 0 8 3 $ 1 2 , 0 8 3 ( $ 2 , 0 0 0 ) ‐14 . 2 0 % 61 9 0  AU T O  RE P A I R S $8 9 0 $ 2 , 1 1 0 $ 2 , 1 1 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 61 9 5  EQ U I P M E N T  MA I N T E N A N C E $3 3 , 7 3 4 $ 1 7 , 3 1 5 $ 1 7 , 3 1 5 $0   0. 0 0 % 62 0 0  EQ U I P  RE P A I R S / N O N  VE H I C L E $1 , 9 7 3 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 4 0 0 $4 0 0   40 . 0 0 % 62 5 0  FA C I L I T Y  MA I N T  & RE P $6 3 , 7 2 1 $ 5 0 , 0 4 9 $ 6 5 , 0 0 0 $ 1 4 , 9 5 1   29 . 8 7 % 63 3 0  RA D I O  SE R V I C E $0 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 $0 ( $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 ) ‐10 0 . 0 0 % OU T S I D E  SE R V I C E S $1 0 3 , 4 0 8 $ 9 4 , 5 5 7 $ 9 7 , 9 0 8 $ 3 , 3 5 1   3. 5 4 % 71 5 0  DU E S  & SU B S C R I P T I O N S $0 $1 2 0 $1 2 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 71 7 0  TR A V E L  EX P E N S E $1 4 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! 72 0 1  CO M P U T E R  EQ U I P M E N T  BE L O W  $5 0 0 0 $0 $ 5 , 1 8 3 $5 0 0 ( $ 4 , 6 8 3 ) ‐90 . 3 5 % 72 0 2  MI C R O  CO M P U T E R  SO F T W A R E $0 $5 0 0 $5 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 72 2 1  OT H E R  EX P E N S E $0 $2 5 0 $2 5 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 72 4 0  TU I T I O N  & TR A I N I N G $2 1 9 $3 2 5 $3 2 5 $0   0. 0 0 % 72 6 0  EQ U I P M E N T  RE N T A L $0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 74 7 5  IM P R O V E M E N T S ‐‐ UN D E R  $5 0 0 0 $3 , 3 8 6 $ 5 , 0 0 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % OT H E R $3 , 6 1 9 $ 1 2 , 3 7 8 $ 7 , 6 9 5 ( $ 4 , 6 8 3 ) ‐37 . 8 3 % 90 0 0  CA P I T A L  EQ U I P M E N T  RE P L A C E $1 3 , 6 7 7 $ 1 5 , 2 0 1 $ 1 3 , 5 1 2 ( $ 1 , 6 8 9 ) ‐11 . 1 1 % 91 1 5  SM A L L  EQ U I P M E N T $0 $5 4 0 $0 ( $ 5 4 0 ) ‐10 0 . 0 0 % 99 5 0  RE M O D E L I N G  PR O J E C T S $9 9 , 4 2 2 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! CA P I T A L  EX P E N D I T U R E S $1 1 3 , 0 9 9 $ 1 5 , 7 4 1 $ 1 3 , 5 1 2 ( $ 2 , 2 2 9 ) ‐14 . 1 6 % TO T A L  FA C I L I T Y  MA I N T E N A N C E $7 4 8 , 7 0 0 $ 7 5 5 , 2 9 3 $ 5 8 1 , 2 3 2 ( $ 1 7 4 , 0 6 1 ) ‐23 . 0 5 % 01 - 3 5 F A C I L I T I E S M A I N T E N A N C E 23 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 01 ‐40  FI R E LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 10 0 1  RE G U L A R  EA R N I N G S $2 , 7 8 9 , 2 6 9 $ 2 , 7 1 1 , 2 2 3 $ 2 , 8 1 1 , 9 7 5 $ 1 0 0 , 7 5 2   3. 7 2 % 10 0 2  OV E R T I M E  EA R N I N G S $3 4 1 , 5 5 3 $ 3 4 3 , 8 2 6 $ 3 5 2 , 8 0 0 $ 8 , 9 7 4   2. 6 1 % 10 0 5  LO N G E V I T Y  PA Y $1 9 , 5 9 0 $ 2 1 , 0 2 9 $ 1 9 , 2 2 9 ( $ 1 , 8 0 0 ) ‐8. 5 6 % 10 0 6  ED U C A T I O N  PA Y $3 9 , 9 9 8 $ 4 0 , 5 6 0 $ 4 8 , 3 6 0 $ 7 , 8 0 0   19 . 2 3 % 10 0 7  CA R  AL L O W A N C E $7 , 2 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 11 1 0  EM P L O Y E R S  SH A R E  F. I . C . A . $2 3 2 , 5 3 4 $ 2 3 5 , 5 2 5 $ 2 2 9 , 2 0 4 ( $ 6 , 3 2 1 ) ‐2. 6 8 % 11 2 0  EM P L O Y E R S  SH A R E  T. M . R . S . $2 0 , 0 0 3 $ 1 5 , 0 9 5 $ 1 2 , 2 7 5 ( $ 2 , 8 2 0 ) ‐18 . 6 8 % 11 2 1  EM P L O Y E R S  SH A R E  F. R . & R . $4 6 9 , 2 6 6 $ 4 6 3 , 1 0 7 $ 4 7 6 , 2 8 2 $ 1 3 , 1 7 5   2. 8 4 % 11 3 0  IN S U R A N C E ‐EM P L O Y E E  LI F E $1 7 , 9 9 1 $ 1 7 , 2 4 6 $ 1 7 , 2 5 1 $5   0. 0 3 % 11 3 1  IN S U R A N C E ‐WO R K M E N S  CO M P $2 3 , 2 9 0 $2 7 , 8 6 6 $2 3 , 0 1 9 ( $ 4 , 8 4 7 ) ‐17 . 3 9 % 11 3 5  HE A L T H  IN S U R A N C E $3 3 3 , 7 5 0 $ 3 0 6 , 0 0 0 $ 3 1 5 , 0 0 0 $ 9 , 0 0 0   2. 9 4 % SA L A R I E S  & BE N E F I T S $4 , 2 9 4 , 4 4 4 $ 4 , 1 8 8 , 6 7 7 $ 4 , 3 1 2 , 5 9 5 $ 1 2 3 , 9 1 8   2. 9 6 % 20 2 9  CL O T H I N G  AL L O W A N C E $1 9 , 3 6 5 $ 3 5 , 4 0 0 $ 2 3 , 8 0 0 ( $ 1 1 , 6 0 0 ) ‐32 . 7 7 % 20 6 0  PR O T E C T I V E  CL O T H G  & SU P P $6 , 3 3 1 $ 4 , 1 0 0 $ 4 2 , 8 0 0 $ 3 8 , 7 0 0   94 3 . 9 0 % 21 0 0  OF F I C E  SU P P L I E S $3 , 3 5 4 $ 4 , 0 0 0 $ 4 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 23 1 8  CO M P U T E R  SU P P L I E S $0 $5 0 0 $5 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 23 2 0  GA S ,  OI L  & GR E A S E $1 9 , 0 9 7 $ 2 1 , 5 7 4 $ 2 1 , 5 7 4 $0   0. 0 0 % 23 4 5  MI C U  DR U G S  & SU P P L I E S $3 8 , 0 4 0 $ 3 0 , 9 0 0 $ 4 1 , 0 0 0 $ 1 0 , 1 0 0   32 . 6 9 % 23 5 0  SU P P L I E S  & MA T E R I A L S $1 6 , 3 2 8 $ 1 4 , 0 0 0 $ 1 6 , 0 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0   14 . 2 9 % SU P P L I E S $1 0 2 , 5 1 5 $ 1 1 0 , 4 7 4 $ 1 4 9 , 6 7 4 $ 3 9 , 2 0 0   35 . 4 8 % 30 1 0  PO S T A G E $2 6 1 $5 0 0 $5 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 30 6 0  PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $3 8 , 8 0 0 $ 1 0 3 , 1 0 0 $ 6 9 , 4 0 0 ( $ 3 3 , 7 0 0 ) ‐32 . 6 9 % 30 6 3  PR O G R A M M I N G / M A I N T E N A N C E $3 6 , 8 4 0 $ 3 9 , 9 7 0 $ 4 4 , 0 1 0 $ 4 , 0 4 0   10 . 1 1 % 30 6 4  EM E R G E N C Y  MA N A G E M E N T $6 , 0 2 5 $7 , 0 0 0 $1 6 , 4 1 2 $ 9 , 4 1 2   13 4 . 4 6 % 31 1 3  PR I N T I N G $1 , 7 7 5 $ 1 , 5 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 ( $ 5 0 0 ) ‐33 . 3 3 % 31 1 5  CO N T R A C T  MA I N T E N A N C E $5 4 , 1 0 3 $ 5 5 , 9 9 8 $ 6 7 , 2 8 1 $ 1 1 , 2 8 3   20 . 1 5 % PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $1 3 7 , 8 0 4 $ 2 0 8 , 0 6 8 $ 1 9 8 , 6 0 3 ( $ 9 , 4 6 5 ) ‐4. 5 5 % 41 1 0  HE A T , L I G H T , W A T E R  UT I L $5 7 , 3 9 3 $ 6 2 , 6 2 1 $ 5 5 , 0 0 0 ( $ 7 , 6 2 1 ) ‐12 . 1 7 % 41 2 0  TE L E P H O N E  SE R V I C E $1 5 , 8 6 7 $ 1 2 , 9 1 6 $ 1 2 , 6 1 7 ( $ 2 9 9 ) ‐2. 3 1 % UT I L I T I E S $7 3 , 2 6 0 $ 7 5 , 5 3 7 $ 6 7 , 6 1 7 ( $ 7 , 9 2 0 ) ‐10 . 4 8 % 01 - 4 0 F I R E 24 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 01 ‐40  FI R E LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 55 0 0  IN S U R A N C E ‐AU T O  LI A B I L I T Y $3 , 0 2 1 $ 2 , 7 8 9 $ 2 , 7 8 9 $0   0. 0 0 % 55 0 6  IN S U R A N C E ‐GE N E R A L  LI A B I L I T Y $5 , 1 5 0 $ 1 , 8 5 5 $ 1 , 8 5 5 $0   0. 0 0 % IN S U R A N C E $8 , 1 7 1 $ 4 , 6 4 4 $ 4 , 6 4 4 $0   0. 0 0 % 61 9 0  AU T O  RE P A I R S $4 5 , 3 1 9 $ 2 1 , 5 6 0 $ 2 1 , 5 6 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 61 9 5  EQ U I P M E N T  MA I N T E N A N C E $7 1 , 6 4 4 $ 6 5 , 5 3 3 $ 6 5 , 5 3 3 $0   0. 0 0 % 62 0 0  EQ U I P  RE P A I R S / N O N  VE H I C L E $7 , 8 8 0 $ 4 , 5 0 0 $ 4 , 0 0 0 ( $ 5 0 0 ) ‐11 . 1 1 % 63 3 0  RA D I O  SE R V I C E $0 $ 4 , 0 0 0 $ 4 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % OU T S I D E  SE R V I C E S $1 2 4 , 8 4 3 $ 9 5 , 5 9 3 $ 9 5 , 0 9 3 ( $ 5 0 0 ) ‐0. 5 2 % 71 5 0  DU E S  & SU B S C R I P T I O N S $5 , 6 7 5 $ 7 , 2 3 0 $ 7 , 8 8 0 $6 5 0   8. 9 9 % 71 7 0  TR A V E L  EX P E N S E $2 , 8 6 4 $ 1 4 , 8 2 0 $ 1 4 , 8 2 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 72 0 1  CO M P U T E R  EQ U I P M E N T  BE L O W  $5 0 0 0 $5 , 1 1 2 $ 1 3 , 1 0 1 $ 7 , 9 5 0 ( $ 5 , 1 5 1 ) ‐39 . 3 2 % 72 0 2  MI C R O  CO M P U T E R  SO F T W A R E $0 $5 0 0 $5 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 72 2 1  OT H E R  EX P E N S E $1 7 4 $ 3 , 0 0 0 $0 ( $ 3 , 0 0 0 ) ‐10 0 . 0 0 % 72 4 0  TU I T I O N  & TR A I N I N G $2 5 , 4 2 8 $ 2 6 , 8 4 0 $ 3 1 , 1 4 0 $ 4 , 3 0 0   16 . 0 2 % 72 4 1  EM S  CO N T I N U I N G  ED U C A T I O N $1 6 , 3 8 7 $ 1 7 , 0 7 6 $ 1 7 , 8 6 7 $7 9 1   4. 6 3 % 74 7 5  IM P R O V E M E N T S ‐‐ UN D E R  $5 0 0 0 $4 4 , 2 5 3 $ 5 , 8 5 0 $ 1 7 , 4 0 0 $ 1 1 , 5 5 0   19 7 . 4 4 % 77 2 5  FI R E  PR E V E N T I O N $1 2 , 4 9 8 $ 1 1 , 8 0 0 $ 1 3 , 5 0 0 $ 1 , 7 0 0   14 . 4 1 % OT H E R $1 1 2 , 3 9 1 $ 1 0 0 , 2 1 7 $ 1 1 1 , 0 5 7 $ 1 0 , 8 4 0   10 . 8 2 % 90 0 0  CA P I T A L  EQ U I P M E N T  RE P L A C E $7 1 , 1 1 8 $ 7 7 , 1 3 3 $ 8 3 , 4 3 5 $ 6 , 3 0 2   8. 1 7 % 92 0 5  CA M E R A  EQ U I P M E N T $0 $0 $ 1 8 , 0 0 0 $ 1 8 , 0 0 0   #D I V / 0 ! 93 5 7  FI R E  FI G H T I N G  EQ U I P ‐MA J O R $3 3 , 1 9 6 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! CA P I T A L  EX P E N D I T U R E S $1 0 4 , 3 1 4 $ 7 7 , 1 3 3 $ 1 0 1 , 4 3 5 $ 2 4 , 3 0 2   31 . 5 1 % TO T A L  FI R E $4 , 9 5 7 , 7 4 2 $ 4 , 8 6 0 , 3 4 2 $ 5 , 0 4 0 , 7 1 8 $ 1 8 0 , 3 7 6   3. 7 1 % 01 - 4 0 F I R E 25 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 01 ‐50  PO L I C E LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 10 0 1  RE G U L A R  EA R N I N G S $3 , 6 1 5 , 4 4 0 $ 3 , 6 7 2 , 1 9 2 $ 3 , 8 2 5 , 5 0 3 $ 1 5 3 , 3 1 1   4. 1 7 % 10 0 2  OV E R T I M E  EA R N I N G S $2 9 6 , 5 8 7 $ 3 0 6 , 5 9 0 $ 3 4 2 , 7 0 2 $ 3 6 , 1 1 2   11 . 7 8 % 10 0 4  MI S C E L L A N E O U S  AL L O W A N C E S $8 , 6 2 7 $ 7 , 8 0 0 $ 6 , 6 0 0 ( $ 1 , 2 0 0 ) ‐15 . 3 8 % 10 0 5  LO N G E V I T Y  PA Y $2 2 , 6 9 5 $ 2 2 , 8 6 1 $ 2 5 , 1 5 2 $ 2 , 2 9 1   10 . 0 2 % 10 0 6  ED U C A T I O N  PA Y $5 6 , 4 1 1 $ 5 8 , 5 0 0 $ 5 3 , 7 0 0 ( $ 4 , 8 0 0 ) ‐8. 2 1 % 10 0 9  CE L L  PH O N E  AL L O W A N C E $1 , 1 6 3 $ 1 , 0 8 0 $ 1 , 0 8 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 11 1 0  EM P L O Y E R S  SH A R E  F. I . C . A . $2 9 1 , 5 4 6 $ 3 1 0 , 0 6 7 $ 3 0 9 , 5 1 0 ( $ 5 5 7 ) ‐0. 1 8 % 11 2 0  EM P L O Y E R S  SH A R E  T. M . R . S . $5 4 5 , 9 1 6 $ 4 1 7 , 2 8 9 $ 3 4 0 , 3 8 5 ( $ 7 6 , 9 0 4 ) ‐18 . 4 3 % 11 3 0  IN S U R A N C E ‐EM P L O Y E E  LI F E $2 2 , 5 0 9 $ 2 3 , 0 2 5 $2 4 , 1 3 7 $ 1 , 1 1 2   4. 8 3 % 11 3 1  IN S U R A N C E ‐WO R K M E N S  CO M P $3 5 , 6 4 2 $ 3 9 , 5 0 1 $ 3 3 , 2 9 5 ( $ 6 , 2 0 6 ) ‐15 . 7 1 % 11 3 2  IN S U R A N C E ‐UN E M P L O Y M E N T $1 4 , 9 4 4 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! 11 3 5  HE A L T H  IN S U R A N C E $4 5 9 , 0 0 0 $ 4 5 0 , 0 0 0 $ 4 5 9 , 0 0 0 $ 9 , 0 0 0   2. 0 0 % SA L A R I E S  & BE N E F I T S $5 , 3 7 0 , 4 8 0 $ 5 , 3 0 8 , 9 0 5 $ 5 , 4 2 1 , 0 6 4 $ 1 1 2 , 1 5 9   2. 1 1 % 20 2 9  CL O T H I N G  AL L O W A N C E $2 9 , 8 2 2 $ 3 6 , 2 0 5 $ 4 0 , 0 0 5 $ 3 , 8 0 0   10 . 5 0 % 21 0 0  OF F I C E  SU P P L I E S $1 0 , 1 3 8 $ 9 , 5 0 0 $ 9 , 7 5 0 $2 5 0   2. 6 3 % 23 1 8  CO M P U T E R  SU P P L I E S $7 5 9 $ 3 , 1 0 0 $ 3 , 6 0 0 $5 0 0   16 . 1 3 % 23 2 0  GA S ,  OI L  & GR E A S E $8 2 , 3 3 2 $ 9 2 , 7 1 4 $ 9 2 , 7 1 4 $0   0. 0 0 % 23 5 0  SU P P L I E S  & MA T E R I A L S $1 0 , 9 1 7 $ 1 6 , 1 7 5 $ 1 6 , 4 7 5 $3 0 0   1. 8 5 % SU P P L I E S $1 3 3 , 9 6 8 $ 1 5 7 , 6 9 4 $ 1 6 2 , 5 4 4 $ 4 , 8 5 0   3. 0 8 % 30 1 0  PO S T A G E $1 , 8 8 9 $ 3 , 6 5 0 $ 1 , 6 0 0 ( $ 2 , 0 5 0 ) ‐56 . 1 6 % 30 1 1  DE T E N T I O N  SE R V I C E S $1 , 2 6 0 $ 8 , 1 0 0 $ 8 , 1 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 30 1 4  PU B L I C A T I O N S $1 9 7 $ 4 , 1 1 0 $ 4 , 1 1 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 30 6 0  PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $2 3 3 , 6 1 0 $ 2 3 3 , 7 0 3 $ 2 4 1 , 0 4 2 $ 7 , 3 3 9   3. 1 4 % 30 6 2  AN I M A L  CO N T R O L  SE R V I C E S $8 , 6 7 3 $ 1 2 , 8 7 5 $1 2 , 9 7 5 $1 0 0   0. 7 8 % 30 6 3  PR O G R A M M I N G / M A I N T E N A N C E $1 2 1 , 7 4 4 $ 1 2 7 , 4 2 8 $ 1 3 1 , 4 5 2 $ 4 , 0 2 4   3. 1 6 % 30 7 0  SP E C I A L  OP E R A T I O N S $0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 30 7 2  AC C R E D I T A T I O N  EX P E N S E S $6 , 9 8 5 $ 1 6 , 4 5 0 $ 2 2 , 5 0 0 $ 6 , 0 5 0   36 . 7 8 % 30 7 5  DI R E C T  AL A R M  MO N I T O R I N G $5 3 , 2 8 8 $ 4 7 , 9 8 9 $ 7 5 , 7 6 5 $ 2 7 , 7 7 6   57 . 8 8 % 31 1 3  PR I N T I N G $8 , 1 8 9 $ 1 1 , 1 0 0 $ 1 3 , 8 0 0 $ 2 , 7 0 0   24 . 3 2 % 31 1 5  CO N T R A C T  MA I N T E N A N C E $3 1 , 5 7 4 $ 3 4 , 5 0 4 $ 3 6 , 2 7 8 $ 1 , 7 7 4   5. 1 4 % 32 6 1  WR E C K E R  FE E S $1 4 0 $5 0 0 $6 0 0 $1 0 0   20 . 0 0 % 32 9 1  GU N S / E Q U I P M E N T $4 5 , 5 9 6 $ 2 3 , 5 3 5 $ 3 5 , 5 3 5 $ 1 2 , 0 0 0   50 . 9 9 % PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $5 1 3 , 1 4 5 $ 5 2 4 , 9 4 4 $ 5 8 4 , 7 5 7 $ 5 9 , 8 1 3   11 . 3 9 % 01 - 5 0 P O L I C E 26 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 01 ‐50  PO L I C E LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 41 1 0  HE A T , L I G H T , W A T E R  UT I L $6 3 , 2 1 5 $ 7 0 , 8 9 0 $ 6 0 , 0 0 0 ( $ 1 0 , 8 9 0 ) ‐15 . 3 6 % 41 2 0  TE L E P H O N E  SE R V I C E $4 8 , 5 3 8 $ 5 1 , 9 3 8 $ 5 7 , 1 4 2 $ 5 , 2 0 4   10 . 0 2 % 41 2 1  91 1  SE R V I C E  FE E S $5 4 , 3 6 3 $ 1 4 8 , 9 6 0 $ 1 4 8 , 9 6 0 $0   0. 0 0 % UT I L I T I E S $1 6 6 , 1 1 6 $ 2 7 1 , 7 8 8 $ 2 6 6 , 1 0 2 ( $ 5 , 6 8 6 ) ‐2. 0 9 % 55 0 0  IN S U R A N C E ‐AU T O  LI A B I L I T Y $6 , 9 3 1 $ 6 , 3 9 8 $ 6 , 3 9 8 $0   0. 0 0 % 55 0 6  IN S U R A N C E ‐GE N E R A L  LI A B I L I T Y $6 , 2 3 8 $ 2 , 2 4 7 $ 2 , 2 4 7 $0   0. 0 0 % 55 0 8  IN S U R A N C E ‐PO L I C E  PR O F  LI A $1 2 , 0 0 0 $ 1 4 , 0 0 0 $ 1 4 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % IN S U R A N C E $2 5 , 1 6 9 $ 2 2 , 6 4 5 $ 2 2 , 6 4 5 $0   0. 0 0 % 61 9 0  AU T O  RE P A I R S $3 7 , 4 4 2 $ 3 9 , 7 0 7 $ 3 9 , 7 0 7 $0   0. 0 0 % 61 9 5  EQ U I P M E N T  MA I N T E N A N C E $9 6 , 8 7 3 $ 1 4 7 , 9 2 9 $ 1 4 7 , 9 2 9 $0   0. 0 0 % 62 0 0  EQ U I P  RE P A I R S / N O N  VE H I C L E $4 , 6 3 3 $ 4 , 2 0 0 $ 4 , 2 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 63 3 0  RA D I O  SE R V I C E $4 5 2 $ 2 , 4 0 0 $ 2 , 4 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % OU T S I D E  SE R V I C E S $1 3 9 , 4 0 0 $ 1 9 4 , 2 3 6 $ 1 9 4 , 2 3 6 $0   0. 0 0 % 71 5 0  DU E S  & SU B S C R I P T I O N S $3 , 0 6 9 $ 6 , 0 5 4 $ 5 , 6 9 4 ( $ 3 6 0 ) ‐5. 9 5 % 71 6 2  EM P L O Y E E  PH Y S I C A L S $4 6 4 $ 4 , 0 0 0 $4 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 71 7 0  TR A V E L  EX P E N S E $2 0 , 2 3 6 $ 2 2 , 0 8 0 $ 2 3 , 3 8 0 $ 1 , 3 0 0   5. 8 9 % 72 0 1  CO M P U T E R  EQ U I P M E N T  BE L O W  $5 0 0 0 $8 , 2 1 0 $ 1 6 , 9 0 9 $ 2 , 0 0 0 ( $ 1 4 , 9 0 9 ) ‐88 . 1 7 % 72 0 2  MI C R O  CO M P U T E R  SO F T W A R E $2 , 2 7 7 $ 1 0 , 3 5 0 $ 1 0 , 3 5 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 72 2 1  OT H E R  EX P E N S E $1 5 , 1 2 3 $ 7 , 5 0 0 $ 7 , 5 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 72 2 3  CR I M E  PR E V / Y O U T H  SE R V I C E S $1 , 3 7 3 $ 2 , 8 0 0 $ 2 , 8 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 72 4 0  TU I T I O N  & TR A I N I N G $2 1 , 6 8 5 $ 2 6 , 9 1 0 $ 2 6 , 9 1 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 74 7 5  IM P R O V E M E N T S ‐‐ UN D E R  $5 0 0 0 $1 5 , 7 6 7 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! OT H E R $8 8 , 2 0 4 $ 9 6 , 6 0 3 $ 8 2 , 6 3 4 ( $ 1 3 , 9 6 9 ) ‐14 . 4 6 % 90 0 0  CA P I T A L  EQ U I P M E N T  RE P L A C E $6 6 , 4 5 9 $ 7 5 , 1 0 7 $ 6 1 , 2 8 6 ( $ 1 3 , 8 2 1 ) ‐18 . 4 0 % 91 1 5  SM A L L  EQ U I P M E N T $7 , 0 4 0 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! 92 0 1  MI C R O  CO M P U T E R  EQ U I P M E N T $0 $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 $0 ( $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 ) ‐10 0 . 0 0 % CA P I T A L  EX P E N D I T U R E S $7 3 , 4 9 9 $ 9 0 , 1 0 7 $ 6 1 , 2 8 6 ( $ 2 8 , 8 2 1 ) ‐31 . 9 9 % TO T A L  PO L I C E $6 , 5 0 9 , 9 8 1 $ 6 , 6 6 6 , 9 2 2 $ 6 , 7 9 5 , 2 6 8 $ 1 2 8 , 3 4 6   1. 9 3 % 01 - 5 0 P O L I C E 27 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 01 ‐70  PA R K S LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 10 0 1  RE G U L A R  EA R N I N G S $1 , 3 2 5 , 4 5 6 $ 1 , 3 2 7 , 4 0 1 $ 1 , 3 2 1 , 2 1 5 ( $ 6 , 1 8 6 ) ‐0. 4 7 % 10 0 2  OV E R T I M E  EA R N I N G S $7 3 , 6 7 1 $ 7 8 , 8 2 5 $ 7 8 , 4 7 0 ( $ 3 5 5 ) ‐0. 4 5 % 10 0 5  LO N G E V I T Y  PA Y $1 6 , 0 3 2 $ 1 6 , 8 2 7 $ 1 6 , 1 8 5 ( $ 6 4 2 ) ‐3. 8 2 % 10 0 7  CA R  AL L O W A N C E $1 4 , 4 0 0 $ 1 4 , 4 0 0 $ 1 4 , 4 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 10 0 9  CE L L  PH O N E  AL L O W A N C E $9 6 0 $9 6 0 $9 6 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 11 1 0  EM P L O Y E R S  SH A R E  F. I . C . A . $1 0 5 , 5 7 3 $ 1 0 7 , 9 2 1 $ 1 0 7 , 9 3 0 $9   0. 0 1 % 11 2 0  EM P L O Y E R S  SH A R E  T. M . R . S . $1 9 8 , 5 9 0 $ 1 5 0 , 1 8 9 $ 1 1 8 , 2 2 4 ( $ 3 1 , 9 6 5 ) ‐21 . 2 8 % 11 3 0  IN S U R A N C E ‐EM P L O Y E E  LI F E $9 , 0 4 1 $ 8 , 8 0 2 $ 8 , 8 3 0 $2 8   0. 3 2 % 11 3 1  IN S U R A N C E ‐WO R K M E N S  CO M P $1 1 , 2 1 4 $ 1 6 , 1 5 3 $ 1 2 , 6 0 4 ( $ 3 , 5 4 9 ) ‐21 . 9 7 % 11 3 5  HE A L T H  IN S U R A N C E $2 1 6 , 0 0 0 $1 8 9 , 0 0 0 $1 8 0 , 0 0 0 ( $ 9 , 0 0 0 ) ‐4. 7 6 % SA L A R I E S  & BE N E F I T S $1 , 9 7 0 , 9 3 7 $ 1 , 9 1 0 , 4 7 8 $ 1 , 8 5 8 , 8 1 8 ( $ 5 1 , 6 6 0 ) ‐2. 7 0 % 20 2 9  CL O T H I N G  AL L O W A N C E $1 4 , 8 2 1 $ 1 4 , 2 2 2 $ 1 4 , 2 2 2 $0   0. 0 0 % 21 0 0  OF F I C E  SU P P L I E S $5 , 6 4 7 $ 2 , 5 5 0 $ 2 , 5 5 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 23 1 8  CO M P U T E R  SU P P L I E S $2 6 6 $5 0 0 $5 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 23 2 0  GA S ,  OI L  & GR E A S E $2 9 , 0 8 8 $ 2 9 , 3 8 0 $ 2 9 , 3 8 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 23 5 0  SU P P L I E S  & MA T E R I A L S $5 2 , 9 3 7 $ 4 8 , 2 0 0 $ 4 8 , 2 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 23 6 0  SM A L L  TO O L S $5 , 1 3 8 $ 1 1 , 0 0 0 $ 1 1 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 23 8 1  FE R T I L I Z E R , C H E M I C A L S  &S U P $4 8 , 2 4 1 $ 6 0 , 0 0 0 $ 6 0 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % SU P P L I E S $1 5 6 , 1 3 8 $ 1 6 5 , 8 5 2 $ 1 6 5 , 8 5 2 $0   0. 0 0 % 30 1 0  PO S T A G E $1 , 6 3 2 $6 0 0 $ 1 , 6 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0   16 6 . 6 7 % 30 6 0  PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $9 , 2 6 0 $ 8 , 0 0 0 $ 8 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 30 6 3  PR O G R A M M I N G / M A I N T E N A N C E $5 , 4 9 0 $ 6 , 0 0 0 $ 6 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 31 1 3  PR I N T I N G $5 4 5 $8 0 0 $8 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 31 1 5  CO N T R A C T  MA I N T E N A N C E $1 9 2 , 5 5 9 $ 2 4 4 , 8 1 0 $ 2 4 4 , 8 1 0 $0   0. 0 0 % PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $2 0 9 , 4 8 6 $ 2 6 0 , 2 1 0 $ 2 6 1 , 2 1 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0   0. 3 8 % 41 1 0  HE A T , L I G H T , W A T E R  UT I L $1 1 8 , 6 4 3 $ 1 3 0 , 4 3 0 $ 1 1 0 , 0 0 0 ( $ 2 0 , 4 3 0 ) ‐15 . 6 6 % 41 2 0  TE L E P H O N E  SE R V I C E $7 , 9 5 8 $ 6 , 5 0 3 $ 8 , 3 9 7 $ 1 , 8 9 4   29 . 1 3 % UT I L I T I E S $1 2 6 , 6 0 1 $ 1 3 6 , 9 3 3 $ 1 1 8 , 3 9 7 ( $ 1 8 , 5 3 6 ) ‐13 . 5 4 % 55 0 0  IN S U R A N C E ‐AU T O  LI A B I L I T Y $7 , 3 7 6 $ 6 , 8 0 9 $ 6 , 8 0 9 $0   0. 0 0 % 55 0 6  IN S U R A N C E ‐GE N E R A L  LI A B I L I T Y $3 , 1 4 6 $ 1 , 1 3 3 $ 1 , 1 3 3 $0   0. 0 0 % 01 - 7 0 P A R K S 28 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 01 ‐70  PA R K S LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % IN S U R A N C E $1 0 , 5 2 2 $ 7 , 9 4 2 $ 7 , 9 4 2 $0   0. 0 0 % 61 9 0  AU T O  RE P A I R S $9 , 4 8 7 $ 1 7 , 8 6 1 $ 1 5 , 8 5 0 ( $ 2 , 0 1 1 ) ‐11 . 2 6 % 61 9 5  EQ U I P M E N T  MA I N T E N A N C E $1 0 1 , 0 7 1 $ 1 0 8 , 6 7 5 $ 1 0 8 , 6 7 5 $0   0. 0 0 % 62 0 0  EQ U I P  RE P A I R S / N O N  VE H I C L E $1 0 , 0 1 1 $ 6 , 2 5 0 $ 6 , 2 5 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 62 0 5  PA R K  FA C I L I T Y  RE P A I R $2 2 , 7 2 6 $ 3 1 , 0 0 0 $ 3 1 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 62 0 8  PA R K  EQ U I P M E N T  RE P A I R $2 3 , 0 0 2 $ 2 0 , 0 0 0 $ 2 0 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 63 8 0  FL O W E R S , T R E E S  & SH R U B S $4 2 , 4 2 7 $ 5 1 , 0 0 0 $ 5 1 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % OU T S I D E  SE R V I C E S $2 0 8 , 7 2 4 $ 2 3 4 , 7 8 6 $ 2 3 2 , 7 7 5 ( $ 2 , 0 1 1 ) ‐0. 8 6 % $0   #D I V / 0 ! 71 5 0  DU E S  & SU B S C R I P T I O N S $1 , 2 7 9 $ 2 , 1 8 0 $ 2 , 1 8 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 71 7 0  TR A V E L  EX P E N S E $2 , 5 2 5 $ 3 , 0 1 0 $ 3 , 0 1 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 72 0 1  CO M P U T E R  EQ U I P M E N T  BE L O W  $5 0 0 0 $2 , 0 2 8 $ 3 , 1 9 9 $5 0 0 ( $ 2 , 6 9 9 ) ‐84 . 3 7 % 72 0 2  MI C R O  CO M P U T E R  SO F T W A R E $0 $ 6 , 0 5 0 $ 4 , 0 5 0 ( $ 2 , 0 0 0 ) ‐33 . 0 6 % 72 2 1  OT H E R  EX P E N S E $2 , 6 4 9 $ 3 , 0 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 72 4 0  TU I T I O N  & TR A I N I N G $1 , 3 4 3 $ 3 , 3 9 5 $ 3 , 3 9 5 $0   0. 0 0 % 72 6 0  EQ U I P M E N T  RE N T A L $8 9 2 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 74 7 5  IM P R O V E M E N T S ‐‐ UN D E R  $5 0 0 0 $8 6 , 1 5 8 $ 3 1 , 0 0 0 $ 3 1 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % OT H E R $9 6 , 8 7 4 $ 5 2 , 8 3 4 $ 4 8 , 1 3 5 ( $ 4 , 6 9 9 ) ‐8. 8 9 % 90 0 0  CA P I T A L  EQ U I P M E N T  RE P L A C E $3 3 , 6 1 3 $ 3 9 , 9 7 5 $ 3 3 , 7 9 3 ( $ 6 , 1 8 2 ) ‐15 . 4 6 % 99 0 0  PA R K  IM P R O V E M E N T S $6 , 8 7 8 $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 $ 1 9 , 0 0 0 ( $ 6 , 0 0 0 ) ‐24 . 0 0 % 99 1 0  OF F I C E  FU R N I T U R E $0 $5 0 0 $0 ( $ 5 0 0 ) ‐10 0 . 0 0 % CA P I T A L  EX P E N D I T U R E S $4 0 , 4 9 1 $ 6 5 , 4 7 5 $ 5 2 , 7 9 3 ( $ 1 2 , 6 8 2 ) ‐19 . 3 7 % TO T A L  PA R K S $2 , 8 1 9 , 7 7 3 $ 2 , 8 3 4 , 5 1 0 $ 2 , 7 4 5 , 9 2 2 ( $ 8 8 , 5 8 8 ) ‐3. 1 3 % 01 - 7 0 P A R K S 29 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 01 ‐75  SW I M M I N G  PO O L LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 10 0 1  RE G U L A R  EA R N I N G S $1 6 2 , 7 6 5 $ 1 6 9 , 4 7 6 $ 1 7 2 , 4 1 1 $ 2 , 9 3 5   1. 7 3 % 10 0 2  OV E R T I M E  EA R N I N G S $1 0 , 1 1 7 $ 7 , 6 5 2 $ 1 0 , 1 0 8 $ 2 , 4 5 6   32 . 1 0 % 11 1 0  EM P L O Y E R S  SH A R E  F. I . C . A . $1 3 , 2 2 5 $ 1 3 , 3 1 4 $ 1 2 , 2 8 0 ( $ 1 , 0 3 4 ) ‐7. 7 7 % 11 3 1  IN S U R A N C E ‐WO R K M E N S  CO M P $0 $ 2 , 2 6 2 $ 1 , 6 3 0 ( $ 6 3 2 ) ‐27 . 9 4 % SA L A R I E S  & BE N E F I T S $1 8 6 , 1 0 7 $ 1 9 2 , 7 0 4 $ 1 9 6 , 4 2 9 $ 3 , 7 2 5   1. 9 3 % 30 1 0  PO S T A G E $4 2 $9 8 2 $5 0 ( $ 9 3 2 ) ‐94 . 9 1 % PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $4 2 $9 8 2 $5 0 ( $ 9 3 2 ) ‐94 . 9 1 % 41 2 0  TE L E P H O N E  SE R V I C E $0 $ 1 , 5 0 7 $0 ( $ 1 , 5 0 7 ) ‐10 0 . 0 0 % UT I L I T I E S $0 $ 1 , 5 0 7 $0 ( $ 1 , 5 0 7 ) ‐10 0 . 0 0 % 61 8 9  SW I M M I N G  PO O L  RE P A I R S $3 4 , 8 6 5 $ 1 8 , 0 0 0 $ 2 3 , 0 0 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0   27 . 7 8 % OU T S I D E  SE R V I C E S $3 4 , 8 6 5 $ 1 8 , 0 0 0 $ 2 3 , 0 0 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0   27 . 7 8 % 73 9 0  SW I M M I N G  PO O L  EX P E N S E $5 1 , 0 8 9 $ 5 6 , 3 9 0 $ 5 6 , 3 9 0 $0   0. 0 0 % OT H E R $5 1 , 0 8 9 $ 5 6 , 3 9 0 $ 5 6 , 3 9 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 95 6 5  SW I M M I N G  PO O L  EQ U I P M E N T $0 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! CA P I T A L  EX P E N D I T U R E S $0 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! TO T A L  SW I M M I N G  PO O L $2 7 2 , 1 0 3 $ 2 6 9 , 5 8 3 $ 2 7 5 , 8 6 9 $ 6 , 2 8 6   2. 3 3 % 01 - 7 5 S W I M M I N G P O O L 30 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 01 ‐80  ST R E E T S LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 C H A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 10 0 1  RE G U L A R  EA R N I N G S $7 7 0 , 6 3 1 $ 7 8 4 , 8 9 8 $ 8 1 5 , 9 8 1 $ 3 1 , 0 8 3   3. 9 6 % 10 0 2  OV E R T I M E  EA R N I N G S $2 3 , 6 9 0 $ 1 9 , 2 7 9 $ 2 5 , 6 4 3 $ 6 , 3 6 4   33 . 0 1 % 10 0 5  LO N G E V I T Y  PA Y $1 1 , 4 9 9 $ 1 1 , 9 9 0 $ 1 2 , 8 2 6 $8 3 6   6. 9 7 % 11 1 0  EM P L O Y E R S  SH A R E  F. I . C . A . $6 0 , 1 3 1 $ 6 2 , 4 3 9 $ 6 5 , 3 6 7 $ 2 , 9 2 8   4. 6 9 % 11 2 0  EM P L O Y E R S  SH A R E  T. M . R . S . $1 1 1 , 8 7 1 $ 8 5 , 6 9 7 $ 7 0 , 5 7 8 ( $ 1 5 , 1 1 9 ) ‐17 . 6 4 % 11 3 0  IN S U R A N C E ‐EM P L O Y E E  LI F E $5 , 8 5 5 $ 5 , 2 0 4 $ 5 , 4 4 7 $2 4 3   4. 6 7 % 11 3 1  IN S U R A N C E ‐WO R K M E N S  CO M P $2 4 , 1 8 1 $ 2 6 , 1 1 8 $ 2 0 , 4 2 0 ( $ 5 , 6 9 8 ) ‐21 . 8 2 % 11 3 5  HE A L T H  IN S U R A N C E $1 4 4 , 0 0 0 $ 1 4 4 , 0 0 0 $ 1 3 5 , 0 0 0 ( $ 9 , 0 0 0 ) ‐6. 2 5 % SA L A R I E S  & BE N E F I T S $1 , 1 5 1 , 8 5 8 $ 1 , 1 3 9 , 6 2 5 $ 1 , 1 5 1 , 2 6 2 $ 1 1 , 6 3 7   1. 0 2 % 20 2 9  CL O T H I N G  AL L O W A N C E $1 1 , 2 7 1 $ 1 1 , 9 2 1 $ 1 1 , 6 6 5 ( $ 2 5 6 ) ‐2. 1 5 % 21 0 0  OF F I C E  SU P P L I E S $6 8 0 $9 0 0 $9 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 23 2 0  GA S ,  OI L  & GR E A S E $4 3 , 9 9 3 $ 5 0 , 3 8 7 $4 5 , 3 8 7 ( $ 5 , 0 0 0 ) ‐9. 9 2 % 23 5 0  SU P P L I E S  & MA T E R I A L S $1 2 , 4 8 3 $ 9 , 6 0 0 $ 9 , 6 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 23 6 0  SM A L L  TO O L S $1 0 , 8 8 0 $ 6 , 3 0 0 $ 6 , 3 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % SU P P L I E S $7 9 , 3 0 7 $ 7 9 , 1 0 8 $ 7 3 , 8 5 2 ( $ 5 , 2 5 6 ) ‐6. 6 4 % 30 1 0  PO S T A G E $2 8 $5 3 $3 0 ($ 2 3 ) ‐43 . 4 0 % 30 6 0  PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 $0 ( $ 1 , 5 0 0 ) ‐10 0 . 0 0 % 30 6 3  PR O G R A M M I N G / M A I N T E N A N C E $6 9 4 $ 1 , 7 3 4 $ 1 , 0 0 0 ( $ 7 3 4 ) ‐42 . 3 3 % 31 1 3  PR I N T I N G $0 $2 0 0 $2 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 31 1 5  CO N T R A C T  MA I N T E N A N C E $3 , 9 0 4 $ 2 , 8 2 4 $ 2 , 9 0 6 $8 2   2. 9 0 % PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $4 , 6 2 6 $ 6 , 3 1 1 $ 4 , 1 3 6 ( $ 2 , 1 7 5 ) ‐34 . 4 6 % 41 1 0  HE A T , L I G H T , W A T E R  UT I L $4 , 0 9 3 $ 4 , 3 2 2 $ 4 , 3 0 0 ($ 2 2 ) ‐0. 5 1 % 41 2 0  TE L E P H O N E  SE R V I C E $2 , 6 3 9 $ 2 , 4 5 1 $ 2 , 6 5 6 $2 0 5   8. 3 6 % UT I L I T I E S $6 , 7 3 2 $ 6 , 7 7 3 $ 6 , 9 5 6 $1 8 3   2. 7 0 % 55 0 0  IN S U R A N C E ‐AU T O  LI A B I L I T Y $1 0 , 1 3 0 $ 9 , 3 5 1 $ 9 , 3 5 1 $0   0. 0 0 % 55 0 6  IN S U R A N C E ‐GE N E R A L  LI A B I L I T Y $2 , 5 8 2 $9 3 0 $9 3 0 $0   0. 0 0 % IN S U R A N C E $1 2 , 7 1 2 $ 1 0 , 2 8 1 $ 1 0 , 2 8 1 $0   0. 0 0 % 61 9 0  AU T O  RE P A I R S $3 4 , 1 0 3 $ 5 3 , 8 9 7 $ 5 3 , 8 9 7 $0   0. 0 0 % 61 9 5  EQ U I P M E N T  MA I N T E N A N C E $1 6 7 , 1 2 0 $ 1 5 1 , 1 1 7 $ 1 5 1 , 1 1 7 $0   0. 0 0 % 01 - 8 0 S T R E E T S 31 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 01 ‐80  ST R E E T S LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 C H A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 62 0 0  EQ U I P  RE P A I R S / N O N  VE H I C L E $3 1 3 $6 7 5 $ 1 , 0 7 5 $4 0 0   59 . 2 6 % 63 7 0  ST R E E T  RE P A I R  MA T E R I A L $2 0 0 , 2 6 1 $ 1 7 9 , 5 7 5 $ 2 0 0 , 9 1 0 $ 2 1 , 3 3 5   11 . 8 8 % 63 7 5  SI D E W A L K  RE P A I R  RE I M B U R S E M E N T $1 3 , 6 5 2 $ 6 5 , 0 0 0 $ 6 5 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % OU T S I D E  SE R V I C E S $4 1 5 , 4 4 9 $ 4 5 0 , 2 6 4 $ 4 7 1 , 9 9 9 $ 2 1 , 7 3 5   4. 8 3 % 71 7 0  TR A V E L  EX P E N S E $1 8 6 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! 72 0 1  CO M P U T E R  EQ U I P M E N T  BE L O W  $5 0 0 0 $0 $ 1 , 3 6 5 $ 1 , 3 0 0 ($ 6 5 ) ‐4. 7 6 % 72 2 1  OT H E R  EX P E N S E $6 , 3 9 5 $ 1 , 5 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 72 4 0  TU I T I O N  & TR A I N I N G $7 3 2 $ 1 , 5 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 72 6 0  EQ U I P M E N T  RE N T A L $0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $0 ( $ 1 , 0 0 0 ) ‐10 0 . 0 0 % OT H E R $7 , 3 1 3 $ 5 , 3 6 5 $ 4 , 3 0 0 ( $ 1 , 0 6 5 ) ‐19 . 8 5 % 90 0 0  CA P I T A L  EQ U I P M E N T  RE P L A C E $5 9 , 5 3 4 $ 5 8 , 5 0 7 $ 5 2 , 5 3 7 ( $ 5 , 9 7 0 ) ‐10 . 2 0 % CA P I T A L  EX P E N D I T U R E S $5 9 , 5 3 4 $ 5 8 , 5 0 7 $ 5 2 , 5 3 7 ( $ 5 , 9 7 0 ) ‐10 . 2 0 % TO T A L  ST R E E T S $1 , 7 3 7 , 5 3 1 $ 1 , 7 5 6 , 2 3 4 $ 1 , 7 7 5 , 3 2 3 $ 1 9 , 0 8 9   1. 0 9 % 01 - 8 0 S T R E E T S 32 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 01 ‐85  TR A N S F E R S LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 63 7 1  RE P A V I N G  OU T S I D E  CO N T R A C T $6 1 7 , 8 2 0 $ 6 1 7 , 8 1 6 $ 6 1 7 , 8 1 6 $0   0. 0 0 % OU T S I D E  SE R V I C E S $6 1 7 , 8 2 0 $ 6 1 7 , 8 1 6 $ 6 1 7 , 8 1 6 $0   0. 0 0 % 71 5 3  CA P I T A L  PR O J E C T S  CO N T R I B $1 , 0 8 4 , 7 6 4 $ 1 , 0 8 4 , 7 5 8 $ 1 , 0 8 4 , 7 5 8 $0   0. 0 0 % OT H E R $1 , 0 8 4 , 7 6 4 $ 1 , 0 8 4 , 7 5 8 $ 1 , 0 8 4 , 7 5 8 $0   0. 0 0 % 85 0 0  TR A N S F E R S $3 7 5 , 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! TR A N S F E R S $3 7 5 , 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! 95 8 2  CU R B  & GU T T E R $9 7 7 , 4 3 6 $ 9 7 7 , 4 4 0 $ 9 7 7 , 4 4 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 98 0 0  AL L E Y  RE P L A C E M E N T  PR O J E C T $3 5 2 , 1 7 6 $ 3 5 2 , 1 7 3 $ 3 5 2 , 1 7 3 $0   0. 0 0 % CA P I T A L  EX P E N D I T U R E S $1 , 3 2 9 , 6 1 2 $ 1 , 3 2 9 , 6 1 3 $ 1 , 3 2 9 , 6 1 3 $0   0. 0 0 % TO T A L  TR A N S F E R S $3 , 4 0 7 , 1 9 6 $ 3 , 0 3 2 , 1 8 7 $ 3 , 0 3 2 , 1 8 7 $0   0. 0 0 % 01 - 8 5 T R A N S F E R S 33OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 02 ‐11  UT I L I T Y  FU N D  RE V E N U E S LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 34 5 0  WA T E R  SA L E S ‐RE S I D E N T I A L $7 , 6 2 9 , 4 6 7   $6 , 6 7 0 , 9 3 0   $7 , 1 9 8 , 2 3 1   $5 2 7 , 3 0 1   7. 9 0 % 34 5 1  WA T E R  SA L E S ‐CO M M E R C I A L $3 2 0 , 3 7 8   $2 6 7 , 0 3 9   $2 9 7 , 2 2 1   $3 0 , 1 8 2   11 . 3 0 % 34 5 2  WA T E R  SA L E S ‐CH U R C H / S C H O O L $4 0 6 , 0 7 1   $3 3 8 , 2 2 0   $3 6 8 , 3 7 8   $3 0 , 1 5 8   8. 9 2 % 35 2 1  WA T E R  SA L E S ‐SM U $9 9 6 , 4 0 4   $7 9 3 , 1 7 0   $9 1 9 , 0 0 8   $1 2 5 , 8 3 8   15 . 8 7 % 35 2 3  ME T E R  IN S T A L L A T I O N $1 1 6 , 9 0 0   $9 5 , 6 0 0   $1 1 5 , 0 0 0   $1 9 , 4 0 0   20 . 2 9 % 35 2 4  WA T E R  RE C O N N E C T I O N S ($ 2 0 ) $0   $0   $0   #D I V / 0 ! 35 2 5  TE S T I N G  FE E S $4 8 8   $0   $0   $0   #D I V / 0 ! SU B T O T A L  WA T E R $9 , 4 6 9 , 6 8 8   $8 , 1 6 4 , 9 5 9   $8 , 8 9 7 , 8 3 8   $7 3 2 , 8 7 9   8. 9 8 % 35 3 2  SE W E R  CH R G ‐SM U $3 2 7 , 3 2 0   $3 7 5 , 8 4 1   $3 6 8 , 4 5 4   ($ 7 , 3 8 7 ) ‐1. 9 7 % 35 3 3  SE W E R  PE R M I T S $2 0 3 , 8 1 5   $3 0 0 , 0 0 0   $2 2 5 , 0 0 0   ($ 7 5 , 0 0 0 ) ‐25 . 0 0 % 35 5 0  SE W E R  CH R G ‐RE S I D E N T I A L $3 , 6 4 7 , 4 4 4   $3 , 8 1 2 , 4 3 2   $3 , 9 5 8 , 7 6 1   $1 4 6 , 3 2 9   3. 8 4 % 35 5 1  SE W E R  CH R G ‐CO M M E R C I A L $1 5 8 , 2 9 1   $1 5 7 , 9 2 0   $1 7 5 , 8 3 0   $1 7 , 9 1 0   11 . 3 4 % 35 5 2  SE W E R  CH R G ‐CH U R C H / S C H O O L $1 1 9 , 6 6 5   $1 5 8 , 5 5 2   $1 5 4 , 4 1 4   ($ 4 , 1 3 8 ) ‐2. 6 1 % SU B T O T A L  WA S T E W A T E R $4 , 4 5 6 , 5 3 5   $4 , 8 0 4 , 7 4 5   $4 , 8 8 2 , 4 5 9   $7 7 , 7 1 4   1. 6 2 % 39 0 3  ST O R M  FE E ‐CO M M E R C I A L $1 8 , 1 2 8   $1 8 , 5 0 0   $1 8 , 5 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 30 9 4  ST O R M  FE E ‐RE S I D E N T I A L $4 1 1 , 3 4 3   $4 1 6 , 0 0 0   $4 1 2 , 0 0 0   ($ 4 , 0 0 0 ) ‐0. 9 6 % 39 0 6  ST O R M  FE E ‐CH U R C H / S C H O O L $1 0 , 9 4 8   $1 0 , 2 0 0   $1 0 , 2 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % SU B T O T A L  ST O R M  WA T E R $4 4 0 , 4 1 9   $4 4 4 , 7 0 0   $4 4 0 , 7 0 0   ($ 4 , 0 0 0 ) ‐0. 9 0 % 38 5 0  AU C T I O N / S A L E  OF  EQ U I P M E N T $0   $2 , 0 0 0   $0   ($ 2 , 0 0 0 ) ‐10 0 . 0 0 % 39 0 0  IN T E R E S T  EA R N I N G S $2 , 0 7 8   $2 5 , 0 0 0   $2 5 , 0 0 0   $0   0. 0 0 % 39 9 9  OT H E R  RE V E N U E $1 7 , 7 2 4   $3 , 6 0 0   $5 , 0 0 0   $1 , 4 0 0   38 . 8 9 % SU B T O T A L  OT H E R $1 9 , 8 0 2   $3 0 , 6 0 0   $3 0 , 0 0 0   ($ 6 0 0 ) ‐1. 9 6 % TO T A L  RE V E N U E S  ‐   UT I L I T I E S  FU N D $1 4 , 3 8 6 , 4 4 4   $1 3 , 4 4 5 , 0 0 4   $1 4 , 2 5 0 , 9 9 7   $8 0 5 , 9 9 3   5. 9 9 % 02 - 1 1 U F R E V E N U E S 34 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 02 ‐21  UT I L I T I E S  OF F I C E LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 10 0 1  RE G U L A R  EA R N I N G S $2 4 0 , 5 2 2 $ 2 4 5 , 0 7 2 $ 2 1 6 , 3 6 6 ( $ 2 8 , 7 0 6 ) ‐11 . 7 1 % 10 0 2  OV E R T I M E  EA R N I N G S $3 , 0 7 5 $7 1 6 $ 1 , 9 7 2 $ 1 , 2 5 6   17 5 . 4 2 % 10 0 5  LO N G E V I T Y  PA Y $2 , 7 6 4 $ 2 , 9 9 0 $ 2 , 0 0 3 ( $ 9 8 7 ) ‐33 . 0 1 % 11 1 0  EM P L O Y E R S  SH A R E  F. I . C . A . $1 8 , 2 3 8 $ 1 9 , 0 3 2 $ 1 6 , 8 5 7 ( $ 2 , 1 7 5 ) ‐11 . 4 3 % 11 2 0  EM P L O Y E R S  SH A R E  T. M . R . S . $3 5 , 0 8 0 $ 2 6 , 1 2 2 $ 1 8 , 5 1 8 ( $ 7 , 6 0 4 ) ‐29 . 1 1 % 11 3 0  IN S U R A N C E ‐EM P L O Y E E  LI F E $1 , 6 8 9 $ 1 , 6 8 0 $ 1 , 3 4 1 ( $ 3 3 9 ) ‐20 . 1 8 % 11 3 1  IN S U R A N C E ‐WO R K M E N S  CO M P $3 2 0 $3 2 4 $2 4 8 ($ 7 6 ) ‐23 . 4 6 % 11 3 5  HE A L T H  IN S U R A N C E $4 5 , 0 0 0 $ 4 5 , 0 0 0 $ 3 6 , 0 0 0 ( $ 9 , 0 0 0 ) ‐20 . 0 0 % SA L A R I E S  & BE N E F I T S $3 4 6 , 6 8 8 $ 3 4 0 , 9 3 6 $ 2 9 3 , 3 0 5 ( $ 4 7 , 6 3 1 ) ‐13 . 9 7 % 21 0 0  OF F I C E  SU P P L I E S $1 , 3 1 6 $7 , 8 7 6 $7 , 5 7 0 ( $ 3 0 6 ) ‐3. 8 9 % 23 1 8  CO M P U T E R  SU P P L I E S $0 $2 5 0 $2 5 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 23 2 0  GA S ,  OI L  & GR E A S E $7 2 8 $7 9 3 $7 9 3 $0   0. 0 0 % SU P P L I E S $2 , 0 4 4 $ 8 , 9 1 9 $ 8 , 6 1 3 ( $ 3 0 6 ) ‐3. 4 3 % 30 1 0  PO S T A G E $4 2 , 7 2 4 $ 6 8 , 6 9 1 $ 5 2 , 5 0 0 ( $ 1 6 , 1 9 1 ) ‐23 . 5 7 % 30 6 0  PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $3 9 , 6 7 3 $ 4 1 , 9 0 0 $ 4 5 , 1 0 0 $ 3 , 2 0 0   7. 6 4 % 30 6 3  PR O G R A M M I N G / M A I N T E N A N C E $2 2 , 2 2 1 $ 1 7 , 7 9 1 $ 1 8 , 1 9 5 $4 0 4   2. 2 7 % 31 1 3  PR I N T I N G $8 7 1 $ 7 , 1 0 5 $ 5 , 9 0 5 ( $ 1 , 2 0 0 ) ‐16 . 8 9 % PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $1 0 5 , 4 8 9 $ 1 3 5 , 4 8 7 $ 1 2 1 , 7 0 0 ( $ 1 3 , 7 8 7 ) ‐10 . 1 8 % 41 1 0  HE A T , L I G H T , W A T E R  UT I L $1 1 2 , 4 7 5 $ 7 2 , 8 1 4 $ 1 2 0 , 0 0 0 $ 4 7 , 1 8 6   64 . 8 0 % 41 2 0  TE L E P H O N E  SE R V I C E $2 , 1 6 5 $ 2 , 7 8 2 $ 2 , 7 6 8 ($ 1 4 ) ‐0. 5 0 % 42 7 0  SE W E R  PA Y M E N T S $2 , 0 9 3 , 2 0 3 $ 2 , 4 0 5 , 6 9 7 $ 2 , 3 6 1 , 4 4 3 ( $ 4 4 , 2 5 4 ) ‐1. 8 4 % 42 8 0  WA T E R  PU R C H A S E S $4 , 6 5 5 , 7 2 0 $ 4 , 3 3 1 , 6 4 2 $ 4 , 8 8 1 , 0 6 3 $ 5 4 9 , 4 2 1   12 . 6 8 % UT I L I T I E S $6 , 8 6 3 , 5 6 3 $ 6 , 8 1 2 , 9 3 5 $ 7 , 3 6 5 , 2 7 4 $ 5 5 2 , 3 3 9   8. 1 1 % 55 0 0  IN S U R A N C E ‐AU T O  LI A B I L I T Y $1 0 8 $1 0 0 $1 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 55 0 6  IN S U R A N C E ‐GE N E R A L  LI A B I L I T Y $8 , 0 2 2 $ 2 , 8 8 9 $ 2 , 8 8 9 $0   0. 0 0 % IN S U R A N C E $8 , 1 3 0 $ 2 , 9 8 9 $ 2 , 9 8 9 $0   0. 0 0 % 61 9 0  AU T O  RE P A I R S $0 $1 4 $1 4 $0   0. 0 0 % 61 9 5  EQ U I P M E N T  MA I N T E N A N C E $1 , 2 6 5 $ 1 , 2 6 7 $ 1 , 2 6 7 $0   0. 0 0 % 62 0 0  EQ U I P  RE P A I R S / N O N  VE H I C L E $8 , 2 5 9 $ 1 1 , 0 5 0 $ 1 1 , 0 5 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 02 - 2 1 U T I L I T I E S O F F I C E 35 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 02 ‐21  UT I L I T I E S  OF F I C E LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % OU T S I D E  SE R V I C E S $9 , 5 2 4 $ 1 2 , 3 3 1 $ 1 2 , 3 3 1 $0   0. 0 0 % 71 5 0  DU E S  & SU B S C R I P T I O N S $0 $7 0 0 $7 2 5 $2 5   3. 5 7 % 71 7 0  TR A V E L  EX P E N S E $1 , 3 5 6 $ 5 , 4 6 0 $ 6 , 1 2 0 $6 6 0   12 . 0 9 % 72 0 1  CO M P U T E R  EQ U I P M E N T  BE L O W  $5 0 0 0 $1 , 6 6 3 $5 0 0 $ 5 , 7 0 0 $ 5 , 2 0 0   10 4 0 . 0 0 % 72 0 2  MI C R O  CO M P U T E R  SO F T W A R E $0 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! 72 2 1  OT H E R  EX P E N S E $5 4 8 $ 2 , 0 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 72 4 0  TU I T I O N  & TR A I N I N G $1 , 9 2 4 $ 2 , 5 0 0 $ 1 , 9 0 0 ( $ 6 0 0 ) ‐24 . 0 0 % 72 4 5  TU I T I O N  RE I M B U R S E M E N T $0 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! 72 6 0  EQ U I P M E N T  RE N T A L $0 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! 74 7 5  IM P R O V E M E N T S ‐‐ UN D E R  $5 0 0 0 $0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % OT H E R $5 , 4 9 1 $ 1 6 , 1 6 0 $ 2 1 , 4 4 5 $ 5 , 2 8 5   32 . 7 0 % 80 1 0  CO N T R I B U T I O N  TO  GE N .  FU N D $6 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 5 5 0 , 0 0 0 $ 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 5 0 , 0 0 0   9. 0 9 % TR A N S F E R S $6 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 5 5 0 , 0 0 0 $ 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 5 0 , 0 0 0   9. 0 9 % 90 0 0  CA P I T A L  EQ U I P M E N T  RE P L A C E $1 , 5 4 7 $ 1 , 7 4 0 $ 1 , 5 4 7 ( $ 1 9 3 ) ‐11 . 0 9 % 91 0 0  OF F I C E  EQ U I P M E N T $0 $5 0 0 $5 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 99 1 0  OF F I C E  FU R N I T U R E $0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % CA P I T A L  EX P E N D I T U R E S $1 , 5 4 7 $ 3 , 2 4 0 $ 3 , 0 4 7 ( $ 1 9 3 ) ‐5. 9 6 % TO T A L  UT I L I T Y  OF F I C E $7 , 9 4 2 , 4 7 6 $ 7 , 8 8 2 , 9 9 7 $ 8 , 4 2 8 , 7 0 4 $ 5 4 5 , 7 0 7   6. 9 2 % 02 - 2 1 U T I L I T I E S O F F I C E 36 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 02 ‐22  UT I L I T I E S LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 10 0 1  RE G U L A R  EA R N I N G S $1 , 4 7 8 , 2 2 3 $ 1 , 4 6 2 , 7 3 1 $ 1 , 5 6 1 , 0 7 6 $ 9 8 , 3 4 5   6. 7 2 % 10 0 2  OV E R T I M E  EA R N I N G S $4 8 , 3 3 8 $ 4 5 , 5 4 7 $ 5 4 , 9 1 9 $ 9 , 3 7 2   20 . 5 8 % 10 0 5  LO N G E V I T Y  PA Y $1 6 , 6 1 5 $ 1 7 , 5 1 1 $ 1 8 , 6 7 2 $ 1 , 1 6 1   6. 6 3 % 10 0 7  CA R  AL L O W A N C E $7 , 2 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 11 1 0  EM P L O Y E R S  SH A R E  F. I . C . A . $1 1 2 , 0 2 8 $ 1 1 6 , 4 7 6 $ 1 2 4 , 7 7 2 $ 8 , 2 9 6   7. 1 2 % 11 2 0  EM P L O Y E R S  SH A R E  T. M . R . S . $2 1 1 , 1 4 6 $ 1 6 0 , 9 6 4 $ 1 3 5 , 6 2 4 ( $ 2 5 , 3 4 0 ) ‐15 . 7 4 % 11 3 0  IN S U R A N C E ‐EM P L O Y E E  LI F E $8 , 7 8 8 $ 9 , 6 8 7 $ 1 0 , 4 1 7 $7 3 0   7. 5 4 % 11 3 1  IN S U R A N C E ‐WO R K M E N S  CO M P $1 9 , 9 6 1 $ 1 9 , 8 5 0 $ 1 6 , 6 3 4 ( $ 3 , 2 1 6 ) ‐16 . 2 0 % 11 3 2  IN S U R A N C E ‐UN E M P L O Y M E N T $0 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! 11 3 5  HE A L T H  IN S U R A N C E $2 3 4 , 0 0 0 $ 2 3 4 , 0 0 0 $ 2 4 3 , 0 0 0 $ 9 , 0 0 0   3. 8 5 % SA L A R I E S  & BE N E F I T S $2 , 1 3 6 , 2 9 9 $2 , 0 7 3 , 9 6 6 $2 , 1 7 2 , 3 1 4 $ 9 8 , 3 4 8   4. 7 4 % 20 2 9  CL O T H I N G  AL L O W A N C E $1 4 , 5 8 6 $ 1 3 , 9 5 5 $ 1 3 , 6 5 5 ( $ 3 0 0 ) ‐2. 1 5 % 21 0 0  OF F I C E  SU P P L I E S $1 , 0 5 4 $ 2 , 5 5 0 $ 2 , 5 5 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 23 1 8  CO M P U T E R  SU P P L I E S $0 $5 0 0 $5 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 23 2 0  GA S ,  OI L  & GR E A S E $6 8 , 8 2 3 $ 8 1 , 1 6 6 $ 8 1 , 1 6 6 $0   0. 0 0 % 23 5 0  SU P P L I E S  & MA T E R I A L S $8 2 , 3 6 1 $ 8 2 , 5 0 0 $ 6 3 , 1 6 0 ( $ 1 9 , 3 4 0 ) ‐23 . 4 4 % 23 7 0  BA C K F I L L  MA T E R I A L S $1 3 0 , 6 1 9 $ 1 4 5 , 0 0 0 $ 1 5 9 , 0 8 0 $ 1 4 , 0 8 0   9. 7 1 % SU P P L I E S $2 9 7 , 4 4 3 $ 3 2 5 , 6 7 1 $ 3 2 0 , 1 1 1 ( $ 5 , 5 6 0 ) ‐1. 7 1 % 30 0 3  BO A R D  ME E T I N G S $5 4 3 $4 5 0 $4 5 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 30 1 0  PO S T A G E $4 2 $2 0 0 $2 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 30 1 4  PU B L I C A T I O N S $0 $ 2 , 0 9 5 $3 0 0 ( $ 1 , 7 9 5 ) ‐85 . 6 8 % 30 6 0  PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $1 1 3 , 2 0 7 $ 9 9 , 0 0 0 $ 1 0 9 , 0 0 0 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0   10 . 1 0 % 30 6 3  PR O G R A M M I N G / M A I N T E N A N C E $6 0 , 6 8 1 $ 6 0 , 7 2 4 $ 6 9 , 0 2 4 $ 8 , 3 0 0   13 . 6 7 % 31 1 3  PR I N T I N G $1 4 5 $5 0 0 $5 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 31 1 5  CO N T R A C T  MA I N T E N A N C E $6 , 3 6 9 $ 4 , 6 0 7 $ 4 , 7 4 1 $1 3 4   2. 9 1 % PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $1 8 0 , 9 8 7 $ 1 6 7 , 5 7 6 $ 1 8 4 , 2 1 5 $ 1 6 , 6 3 9   9. 9 3 % 41 1 0  HE A T , L I G H T , W A T E R  UT I L $9 , 8 6 8 $ 1 1 , 6 8 6 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 ( $ 1 , 6 8 6 ) ‐14 . 4 3 % 41 2 0  TE L E P H O N E  SE R V I C E $6 , 3 5 8 $ 4 , 0 4 7 $ 7 , 7 2 3 $ 3 , 6 7 6   90 . 8 3 % UT I L I T I E S $1 6 , 2 2 6 $ 1 5 , 7 3 3 $ 1 7 , 7 2 3 $ 1 , 9 9 0   12 . 6 5 % 55 0 0  IN S U R A N C E ‐AU T O  LI A B I L I T Y $1 9 , 5 0 1 $ 1 8 , 0 0 1 $ 1 8 , 0 0 1 $0   0. 0 0 % 02 - 2 2 U T I L I T I E S 37 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 02 ‐22  UT I L I T I E S LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 55 0 6  IN S U R A N C E ‐GE N E R A L  LI A B I L I T Y $4 , 0 8 5 $ 1 , 4 7 1 $ 1 , 4 7 1 $0   0. 0 0 % IN S U R A N C E $2 3 , 5 8 6 $ 1 9 , 4 7 2 $ 1 9 , 4 7 2 $0   0. 0 0 % 61 9 0  AU T O  RE P A I R S $4 5 , 2 2 9 $ 4 0 , 3 6 7 $ 4 0 , 3 6 7 $0   0. 0 0 % 61 9 5  EQ U I P M E N T  MA I N T E N A N C E $2 2 9 , 7 8 9 $ 2 2 6 , 3 5 7 $ 2 2 6 , 3 5 7 $0   0. 0 0 % 62 0 0  EQ U I P  RE P A I R S / N O N  VE H I C L E $3 , 4 9 1 $ 1 , 7 5 0 $ 2 , 1 5 0 $4 0 0   22 . 8 6 % 63 5 5  UT I L I T Y  MA I N  MA I N T E N A N C E $3 6 2 , 3 3 0 $ 2 3 5 , 0 0 0 $ 2 5 3 , 9 2 0 $ 1 8 , 9 2 0   8. 0 5 % OU T S I D E  SE R V I C E S $6 4 0 , 8 3 9 $ 5 0 3 , 4 7 4 $ 5 2 2 , 7 9 4 $ 1 9 , 3 2 0   3. 8 4 % 71 5 0  DU E S  & SU B S C R I P T I O N S $1 , 9 5 7 $ 2 , 4 9 6 $ 2 , 5 9 6 $1 0 0   4. 0 1 % 71 7 0  TR A V E L  EX P E N S E $2 , 7 5 0 $ 1 3 , 2 6 5 $ 7 , 9 4 5 ( $ 5 , 3 2 0 ) ‐40 . 1 1 % 72 0 1  CO M P U T E R  EQ U I P M E N T  BE L O W  $5 0 0 0 $7 8 $ 4 , 7 1 5 $ 4 , 0 0 0 ( $ 7 1 5 ) ‐15 . 1 6 % 72 0 2  MI C R O  CO M P U T E R  SO F T W A R E $0 $ 1 2 , 5 0 0 $ 1 , 2 0 0 ( $ 1 1 , 3 0 0 ) ‐90 . 4 0 % 72 2 1  OT H E R  EX P E N S E $1 , 9 0 1 $ 2 , 9 0 0 $ 2 , 9 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 72 4 0  TU I T I O N  & TR A I N I N G $7 , 2 4 1 $ 8 , 2 1 5 $ 7 , 8 7 0 ( $ 3 4 5 ) ‐4. 2 0 % 72 6 0  EQ U I P M E N T  RE N T A L $0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 73 3 1  PO W E R  TO O L S $1 0 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 $ 6 , 5 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0   30 . 0 0 % 74 7 5  IM P R O V E M E N T S ‐‐ UN D E R  $5 0 0 0 $0 $ 2 , 5 0 0 $0 ( $ 2 , 5 0 0 ) ‐10 0 . 0 0 % 75 0 0  DE P R E C I A T I O N  EX P E N S E $1 0 1 , 2 0 3 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! OT H E R $1 1 5 , 2 3 0 $ 5 4 , 5 9 1 $ 3 6 , 0 1 1 ( $ 1 8 , 5 8 0 ) ‐34 . 0 3 % 90 0 0  CA P I T A L  EQ U I P M E N T  RE P L A C E $8 6 , 0 3 4 $ 9 6 , 8 2 3 $ 9 2 , 8 4 0 ( $ 3 , 9 8 3 ) ‐4. 1 1 % 92 0 1  MI C R O  CO M P U T E R  EQ U I P M E N T $0 $9 , 0 0 0 $0 ($ 9 , 0 0 0 ) ‐10 0 . 0 0 % 95 2 0  WA T E R  SE R V I C E  EQ U I P M E N T $8 , 7 5 6 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! CA P I T A L  EX P E N D I T U R E S $9 4 , 7 9 0 $ 1 0 5 , 8 2 3 $ 9 2 , 8 4 0 ( $ 1 2 , 9 8 3 ) ‐12 . 2 7 % TO T A L  UT I L I T I E S $3 , 5 0 5 , 4 0 0 $ 3 , 2 6 6 , 3 0 6 $ 3 , 3 6 5 , 4 8 0 $ 9 9 , 1 7 4   3. 0 4 % 02 - 2 2 U T I L I T I E S 38 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 02 ‐23  ST O R M  WA T E R LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 21 0 0  OF F I C E  SU P P L I E S $3 5 9 $ 1 , 5 0 0 $5 0 0 ( $ 1 , 0 0 0 ) ‐66 . 6 7 % 23 5 0  SU P P L I E S  & MA T E R I A L S $4 8 0 $ 8 , 5 0 0 $ 6 , 5 0 0 ( $ 2 , 0 0 0 ) ‐23 . 5 3 % SU P P L I E S $8 3 9 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 $ 7 , 0 0 0 ( $ 3 , 0 0 0 ) ‐30 . 0 0 % 30 1 0  PO S T A G E $5 6 9 $ 1 , 1 5 0 $5 7 0 ( $ 5 8 0 ) ‐50 . 4 3 % 30 6 0  PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $6 0 , 8 2 7 $ 6 5 , 0 0 0 $ 2 3 1 , 0 0 0 $ 1 6 6 , 0 0 0   25 5 . 3 8 % 31 1 3  PR I N T I N G $1 8 6 $ 2 , 0 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $6 1 , 5 8 2 $ 6 8 , 1 5 0 $ 2 3 3 , 5 7 0 $ 1 6 5 , 4 2 0   24 2 . 7 3 % 71 5 0  DU E S  & SU B S C R I P T I O N S $6 , 7 5 8 $ 7 , 1 0 0 $ 7 , 1 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 72 2 1  OT H E R  EX P E N S E $8 6 2 $2 0 0 $2 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 72 4 0  TU I T I O N  & TR A I N I N G $2 , 9 2 4 $ 5 , 0 0 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % OT H E R $1 0 , 5 4 4 $ 1 2 , 3 0 0 $ 1 2 , 3 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 92 0 1  MI C R O  CO M P U T E R  EQ U I P M E N T $0 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! CA P I T A L  EX P E N D I T U R E S $0 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! TO T A L  ST O R M  WA T E R $7 2 , 9 6 5 $ 9 0 , 4 5 0 $ 2 5 2 , 8 7 0 $ 1 6 2 , 4 2 0   17 9 . 5 7 % 02 - 2 3 S T O R M W A T E R 39 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 02 ‐85  TR A N S F E R S LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 63 6 5  FI R E  HY D R A N T / L I N E  IN S T A L L $1 7 5 , 8 9 6 $ 1 7 5 , 8 9 3 $ 1 7 5 , 8 9 3 $0   0. 0 0 % OU T S I D E  SE R V I C E S $1 7 5 , 8 9 6 $ 1 7 5 , 8 9 3 $ 1 7 5 , 8 9 3 $0   0. 0 0 % 85 0 0  TR A N S F E R S $0 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! TR A N S F E R S $0 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! 98 0 1  LI N E  RE P L A C E M E N T  PR O J E C T $2 , 0 1 9 , 5 2 8 $ 2 , 0 1 9 , 5 2 2 $ 2 , 0 1 9 , 5 2 2 $0   0. 0 0 % CA P I T A L  EX P E N D I T U R E S $2 , 0 1 9 , 5 2 8 $ 2 , 0 1 9 , 5 2 2 $ 2 , 0 1 9 , 5 2 2 $0   0. 0 0 % TO T A L  TR A N S F E R S $2 , 1 9 5 , 4 2 4 $ 2 , 1 9 5 , 4 1 5 $ 2 , 1 9 5 , 4 1 5 $0   0. 0 0 % 02 - 8 5 T R A N S F E R S 40 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 04 ‐11  SA N I T A T I O N  RE V E N U E S LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 35 4 0  RE F U S E  CO L L  ‐   RE S I D E N T I A L $1 , 8 6 0 , 8 9 7   $1 , 9 0 3 , 4 4 0   $1 , 7 5 0 , 3 0 0   ($ 1 5 3 , 1 4 0 ) ‐8. 0 5 % 35 4 1  RE F U S E  CO L L  ‐   CO M M E R C I A L $3 1 6 , 0 2 7   $3 2 9 , 1 7 5   $4 3 8 , 6 0 0   $1 0 9 , 4 2 5   33 . 2 4 % 35 4 2  RE F U S E  CO L L ‐CH U R C H / S C H O O L $1 5 7 , 0 1 6   $1 9 0 , 5 7 5   $1 6 2 , 0 0 0   ($ 2 8 , 5 7 5 ) ‐14 . 9 9 % 35 0 1  RE F U S E  CO L L ‐SM U $6 5 , 4 7 2   $1 6 1 , 1 2 3   $7 3 , 7 0 0   ($ 8 7 , 4 2 3 ) ‐54 . 2 6 % 35 0 4  RE C Y C L I N G  RE V E N U E $4 1 7 , 1 8 9   $2 9 1 , 0 6 0   $3 8 1 , 0 6 0   $9 0 , 0 0 0   30 . 9 2 % 35 4 3  BR U S H / S P E C I A L  PI C K U P  CH R G $7 6 , 3 9 1   $8 2 , 5 0 0   $7 0 , 0 0 0   ($ 1 2 , 5 0 0 ) ‐15 . 1 5 % 35 0 3  YA R D  WA S T E  BA G S  RE V E N U E $6 0 , 3 5 4   $8 4 , 7 0 0   $6 1 , 5 0 0   ($ 2 3 , 2 0 0 ) ‐27 . 3 9 % SU B T O T A L  CO L L E C T I O N $2 , 9 5 3 , 3 4 6   $3 , 0 4 2 , 5 7 3   $2 , 9 3 7 , 1 6 0   ($ 1 0 5 , 4 1 3 ) ‐3. 4 6 % 39 0 0  IN T E R E S T  EA R N I N G S $4 9 1   $3 , 0 0 0   $5 0 0   ($ 2 , 5 0 0 ) ‐83 . 3 3 % 39 9 9  OT H E R  RE V E N U E $0   $2 4 , 8 7 8   $0   ($ 2 4 , 8 7 8 ) ‐10 0 . 0 0 % SU B T O T A L  OT H E R $4 9 1   $2 7 , 8 7 8   $5 0 0   ($ 2 7 , 3 7 8 ) ‐98 . 2 1 % TO T A L  RE V E N U E S  ‐   SA N I T A T I O N  FU N D $ 2 , 9 5 3 , 8 3 7   $3 , 0 7 0 , 4 5 1   $2 , 9 3 7 , 6 6 0   ($ 1 3 2 , 7 9 1 ) ‐4. 3 2 % 04 - 1 1 S F R E V E N U E 41 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 04 ‐60  SA N I T A T I O N LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 10 0 1  RE G U L A R  EA R N I N G S $1 , 2 4 8 , 1 5 9 $ 1 , 2 2 7 , 4 3 8 $ 1 , 2 1 9 , 8 9 4 ( $ 7 , 5 4 4 ) ‐0. 6 1 % 10 0 2  OV E R T I M E  EA R N I N G S $2 7 , 6 0 6 $ 3 8 , 7 0 6 $ 4 4 , 0 0 7 $ 5 , 3 0 1   13 . 7 0 % 10 0 5  LO N G E V I T Y  PA Y $1 7 , 5 3 8 $ 1 8 , 4 8 8 $ 1 7 , 8 5 5 ( $ 6 3 3 ) ‐3. 4 2 % 10 0 7  CA R  AL L O W A N C E $7 , 2 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 11 1 0  EM P L O Y E R S  SH A R E  F. I . C . A . $9 5 , 6 1 9 $ 9 8 , 8 2 5 $ 9 8 , 6 0 6 ( $ 2 1 9 ) ‐0. 2 2 % 11 2 0  EM P L O Y E R S  SH A R E  T. M . R . S . $1 7 8 , 1 0 3 $ 1 3 5 , 6 4 1 $ 1 0 6 , 4 6 7 ( $ 2 9 , 1 7 4 ) ‐21 . 5 1 % 11 3 0  IN S U R A N C E ‐EM P L O Y E E  LI F E $8 , 0 6 2 $ 8 , 1 2 7 $ 8 , 1 3 0 $3   0. 0 4 % 11 3 1  IN S U R A N C E ‐WO R K M E N S  CO M P $3 0 , 0 4 1 $ 4 0 , 5 1 0 $ 3 3 , 5 3 8 ( $ 6 , 9 7 2 ) ‐17 . 2 1 % 11 3 5  HE A L T H  IN S U R A N C E $2 4 3 , 0 0 0 $ 2 4 3 , 0 0 0 $ 2 4 3 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % SA L A R I E S  & BE N E F I T S $1 , 8 5 5 , 3 2 8 $ 1 , 8 1 7 , 9 3 5 $ 1 , 7 7 8 , 6 9 7 ( $ 3 9 , 2 3 8 ) ‐2. 1 6 % 20 2 9  CL O T H I N G  AL L O W A N C E $1 4 , 0 4 1 $1 3 , 2 3 2 $1 7 , 9 7 8 $ 4 , 7 4 6   35 . 8 7 % 21 0 0  OF F I C E  SU P P L I E S $2 , 2 1 3 $ 3 , 0 6 6 $ 3 , 0 6 6 $0   0. 0 0 % 23 1 8  CO M P U T E R  SU P P L I E S $0 $5 0 0 $5 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 23 2 0  GA S ,  OI L  & GR E A S E $1 2 5 , 9 4 9 $ 1 3 2 , 9 2 5 $ 1 3 2 , 9 2 5 $0   0. 0 0 % 23 5 0  SU P P L I E S  & MA T E R I A L S $1 2 , 4 5 7 $ 1 8 , 1 8 2 $ 1 3 , 2 3 6 ( $ 4 , 9 4 6 ) ‐27 . 2 0 % SU P P L I E S $1 5 4 , 6 6 0 $ 1 6 7 , 9 0 5 $ 1 6 7 , 7 0 5 ( $ 2 0 0 ) ‐0. 1 2 % 30 1 0  PO S T A G E $2 , 4 0 7 $ 4 , 1 0 4 $2 5 0 ( $ 3 , 8 5 4 ) ‐93 . 9 1 % 30 6 0  PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $5 0 0 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! 31 1 3  PR I N T I N G $2 , 7 6 3 $ 1 , 7 9 0 $ 1 , 7 9 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 31 1 5  CO N T R A C T  MA I N T E N A N C E $5 , 1 3 7 $ 3 , 7 1 6 $ 3 , 8 2 4 $1 0 8   2. 9 1 % PR O F E S S I O N A L  SE R V I C E S $1 0 , 8 0 7 $ 9 , 6 1 0 $ 5 , 8 6 4 ( $ 3 , 7 4 6 ) ‐38 . 9 8 % 41 1 0  HE A T , L I G H T , W A T E R  UT I L $1 1 , 5 9 0 $ 1 1 , 3 3 6 $ 1 3 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 6 6 4   14 . 6 8 % 41 2 0  TE L E P H O N E  SE R V I C E $5 , 4 5 4 $ 4 , 4 7 4 $ 5 , 2 1 9 $7 4 5   16 . 6 5 % 43 9 0  LA N D  FI L L $8 6 , 9 8 8 $ 1 4 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 0 1 , 5 0 0 ( $ 3 8 , 5 0 0 ) ‐27 . 5 0 % 43 9 2  DI S P O S A L  FE E S  CO N T I N G E N C Y $0 $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % UT I L I T I E S $1 0 4 , 0 3 2 $ 2 5 5 , 8 1 0 $ 2 1 9 , 7 1 9 ( $ 3 6 , 0 9 1 ) ‐14 . 1 1 % 55 0 0  IN S U R A N C E ‐AU T O  LI A B I L I T Y $1 3 , 7 2 3 $ 1 2 , 6 6 8 $ 1 2 , 6 6 8 $0   0. 0 0 % 55 0 6  IN S U R A N C E ‐GE N E R A L  LI A B I L I T Y $3 , 4 1 3 $ 1 , 2 2 9 $ 1 , 2 2 9 $0   0. 0 0 % IN S U R A N C E $1 7 , 1 3 6 $ 1 3 , 8 9 7 $ 1 3 , 8 9 7 $0   0. 0 0 % 04 - 6 0 S A N I T A T I O N 42 OF 43 CI T Y  OF  UN I V E R S I T Y  PA R K FY 2 0 1 3  BU D G E T 04 ‐60  SA N I T A T I O N LI N E  IT E M S AC T U A L 20 1 0 ‐20 1 1 BU D G E T 20 1 1 ‐20 1 2 PR O P O S E D 20 1 2 ‐20 1 3 CH A N G E  $ C H A N G E  % 61 8 6  TR A N S F E R  ST A T I O N  RE P A I R $1 2 , 7 5 7 $ 1 4 , 6 0 0 $ 1 1 , 4 0 0 ( $ 3 , 2 0 0 ) ‐21 . 9 2 % 61 9 0  AU T O  RE P A I R S $7 2 , 2 1 3 $ 1 5 5 , 8 5 4 $ 1 5 5 , 8 5 4 $0   0. 0 0 % 61 9 5  EQ U I P M E N T  MA I N T E N A N C E $2 2 3 , 9 7 0 $ 2 0 0 , 4 4 9 $ 2 0 0 , 4 4 9 $0   0. 0 0 % 62 0 0  EQ U I P  RE P A I R S / N O N  VE H I C L E $7 7 9 $ 1 , 6 2 5 $ 1 , 8 2 5 $2 0 0   12 . 3 1 % 63 1 8  CO N T A I N E R  MA I N T E N A N C E $4 8 7 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % OU T S I D E  SE R V I C E S $3 1 0 , 2 0 6 $ 3 7 3 , 5 2 8 $ 3 7 0 , 5 2 8 ( $ 3 , 0 0 0 ) ‐0. 8 0 % 71 5 0  DU E S  & SU B S C R I P T I O N S $2 8 4 $ 1 , 0 7 5 $ 1 , 0 7 5 $0   0. 0 0 % 71 7 0  TR A V E L  EX P E N S E $3 6 $4 0 0 $4 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 72 0 1  CO M P U T E R  EQ U I P M E N T  BE L O W  $5 0 0 0 $1 , 5 8 6 $ 1 , 9 6 5 $ 1 , 9 0 0 ($ 6 5 ) ‐3. 3 1 % 72 2 1  OT H E R  EX P E N S E $3 , 0 1 5 $ 6 , 4 6 5 $ 6 , 4 6 5 $0   0. 0 0 % 72 4 0  TU I T I O N  & TR A I N I N G $2 , 0 0 8 $ 1 , 3 6 5 $ 1 , 3 6 5 $0   0. 0 0 % 73 5 0  YA R D  WA S T E  PR O G R A M $2 4 , 9 0 8 $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 73 9 2  CO N T A I N E R S $3 7 , 5 0 1 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 $0   0. 0 0 % 75 0 0  DE P R E C I A T I O N  EX P E N S E $6 , 1 7 2 $0 $0 $0   #D I V / 0 ! 76 0 1  HA Z A R D O U S  WA S T E  SE R V I C E $2 4 , 1 7 3 $ 3 1 , 4 8 0 $ 3 1 , 4 8 0 $0   0. 0 0 % OT H E R $9 9 , 6 8 3 $ 7 7 , 7 5 0 $ 7 7 , 6 8 5 ($ 6 5 ) ‐0. 0 8 % 90 0 0  CA P I T A L  EQ U I P M E N T  RE P L A C E $1 3 4 , 7 1 5 $ 1 5 1 , 5 4 1 $ 1 3 7 , 7 0 8 ( $ 1 3 , 8 3 3 ) ‐9. 1 3 % 99 1 0  OF F I C E  FU R N I T U R E $0 $5 0 0 $0 ( $ 5 0 0 ) ‐10 0 . 0 0 % CA P I T A L  EX P E N D I T U R E S $1 3 4 , 7 1 5 $ 1 5 2 , 0 4 1 $ 1 3 7 , 7 0 8 ( $ 1 4 , 3 3 3 ) ‐9. 4 3 % TO T A L  SA N I T A T I O N $2 , 6 8 6 , 5 6 7 $ 2 , 8 6 8 , 4 7 6 $ 2 , 7 7 1 , 8 0 3 ( $ 9 6 , 6 7 3 ) ‐3. 3 7 % 04 - 6 0 S A N I T A T I O N 43 OF 43 1 CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS FINANCE ADVISORY COMMITTEE THURSDAY, AUGUST 9, 2012 at 7:30 a.m. UNIVERSITY PARK CITY HALL SECOND FLOOR—CITY COUNCIL OVERFLOW ROOM M I N U T E S Attending: City representatives: Atwood, John Austin, Kent--Director of Finance Gordon, Dave Livingston, Bob—City Manager Groves, Irving Moore, Dawn—City Council member Lane, Alvin Tvardzik, Tom—City Controller Noble, Julie Reeder, Dotti Absent: Russell, Thomas Cinatl, Cynthia Stuart, John–Chair Coleman, Russ Wilson, Claude Touchstone, Neill 1. Call to order. Chair John Stuart called the meeting to order at 7:33 a.m. 2. Welcome new members Stuart welcomed new members Alvin Lane and Dave Gordon and new City Council liaison Dawn Moore. He asked the attendees to introduce themselves. 3. Review and approve minutes of June 7, 2012, Committee meeting. Thomas Russell moved to approve the minutes of the June 7, 2012, meeting. Dotti Reeder seconded, and the motion was approved 9-0. 4. Review and make recommendation regarding proposed FY2013 budget. Kent Austin provided an overview of the proposed budget, which includes: x No property tax increase x Establishment of the University Park Public Library as a City department x 3% pay raise for City employees and updating of TMRS service credits/COLA x Balanced General, Utility, and Sanitation Fund budgets x Rate increases (not yet specified) for water and wastewater The budget was transmitted to the City Council August 7 and will be the subject of public hearings August 21 and 28. Adoption is expected September 4, 2012. 2 Discussion ensued. The firefighter pension fund was mentioned, and Stuart asked that City staff provide the new Committee members with a copy of the white paper from 2011 on the City’s retirement funds. Stuart then asked for a motion. Thomas Russell moved to recommend approval of the budget as presented. John Atwood seconded, and the motion passed 9-0. 5. Receive updates: a. June 30, 2012 fund report—Austin directed attendees’ attention to the report. b. Status of water and wastewater rate study project—Austin said the City received three proposals from consultants to perform a water and sewer rate study. Interviews are being scheduled, and a request for City Council approval is expected in September. Four members of the Finance Advisory Committee have volunteered to participate in the study process: Atwood, Gordon, Groves, and Touchstone. 6. New business. There was no new business. 7. Review meeting dates for 2012-2013. All meeting dates are Thursdays at 7:30 a.m.: x October 11, 2012 x December 13, 2012 x February 7, 2013 x April 11, 2013 x June 13, 2013 8. Adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 8:35 a.m. _________________________________ ___________________________________ John Stuart, Chair Kent Austin, Director of Finance City of University Park  Property, Casualty & Liability Insurance Committee  MINUTES  August 23, 2012  A meeting of the Property, Casualty & Liability Insurance Committee was held on August 23,  2012.  Attending the meeting were Chairman Frank Swingle, Bruce Klingman, Ed Orlandi, John  Palter, and Ron Ward.  Also present at the meeting were Councilmember Bob Begert, City  Manager Bob Livingston, Finance Director Kent Austin, and Human Resources Director Luanne  Hanford.    Chairman Frank Swingle called the meeting to order at 4:40 pm.  The committee first discussed  some follow‐up items from the previous meeting regarding Property and Cyber coverage.  Ms.  Hanford said she had received all of the application materials for those coverages from Bob  Bookhammer.  She also said that the underwriter at TML was hoping to have renewal numbers  to her the following week.    The committee then reviewed the liability coverage requirements in an agreement between the  Town of Highland Park and the City of University Park regarding a sanitary sewer line.  Since  both the Town and the City will be renewing insurance policies on October 1, 2012, it is an  opportune time to make any necessary changes to the coverage requirements stated in the  agreement.  John Palter said he could suggest some additional language to make it clear that  the agreement is only for the benefit of the Town and the City and does not apply to third  parties.  Frank Swingle suggested that the discussion of limits be tabled until the renewal  numbers come back from TML.    The committee reviewed the Self‐Insurance Fund budget for the City’s insurance plan.  Mr.  Swingle indicated that the addition of Cyber coverage and blanket property coverage might add  to the cost of the plan.  Ms. Hanford suggested that the proposed budget stand for now and, if  necessary, we can do a budget amendment to cover the shortage from fund balance.  Bruce  Klingman moved that the committee recommend the Self‐Insurance Fund budget to the City  Council for approval.  John Palter seconded the motion.  The vote was unanimous in favor.    The meeting was adjourned at 5:35 pm.        ____________________________________  ____________________________________  Frank Swingle      Luanne Hanford    EMPLOYEE BENEFITS COMMITTEE  MINUTES  August 28, 2012  A meeting of the Employee Benefits Committee was held on Tuesday, August 28, 2012.   Committee members attending the meeting were Chairman Roger Lambourn, Stephen Black,  Clair Crossland, John Falconer, Angela Fontana, Lance Johnsen, Jim Klancnik, Blair Mercer, and  Steven Moore.  Russell Huber was absent and excused.  Also in attendance were  Councilmember Bob Begert, City Manager Bob Livingston, Finance Director Kent Austin, and  Human Resources Director Luanne Hanford.  The meeting was called to order at 7:40 AM.  The  committee members all introduced themselves and stated what their background is.    Ms. Hanford explained to the committee that when the City Council receives the proposed  budget from the city manager, the Council refers it to three committees:  the Finance  Committee, the Employee Benefits Committee, and the Property, Casualty & Liability Insurance  Committee for review and recommendation.  The Employee Benefits Committee is charged  with reviewing proposed changes to pay and benefits and making recommendations to the City  Council.    The first item discussed by the committee was the proposed pay increase.  Ms. Hanford told the  committee that the proposed budget includes a 3% across‐the‐board pay increase for all  employees.  The last pay increase was in 2010, and the one before that was in 2008.  The  proposed pay increase will be funded by a reduction in the city’s TMRS contribution from 10%  to 8.26% plus additional non‐property tax revenue.  After a brief discussion, Clair Crossland  moved to recommend the proposed pay increase to the City Council.  Roger Lambourn  seconded the motion, and the vote was unanimous in favor.    The next item discussed by the committee was the proposed TMRS Updated Service Credits  (USC) and Cost of Living (COLA) increase for retirees.  Ms. Hanford explained that updating  service credits takes an employee’s salary changes and any plan changes adopted by the city  over time and assumes those increases and changes have been in effect throughout the  employee’s career.  The proposed retiree COLA will increase the retirees’ benefits by 70% of the  increase in the CPI since the last time the COLA was adopted.  A retiree COLA cannot be  adopted without adopting USC.  The City last adopted USC  and retiree COLA effective January  1, 2009.  The City’s calculated contribution rate to TMRS dropped in 2012 from 13.87% to  7.25%.  However, the City continued to contribute 10% in 2012 to “pay ahead.”  The plan study  conducted by TMRS indicates that adopting updated service credits and retiree COLA will bring  the city’s rate to 8.26% in 2013.  Ms. Hanford also pointed out that paying more than the  required contribution for the past two years along with changes made by TMRS in calculating  contribution rates has resulted in an unfunded actuarial liability of approximately ‐$2.9 million  and a funded ratio of 103.2%.  If the city adopts USC and retiree COLA, the unfunded actuarial  liability will still be in the negative at about ‐$462,000 and a funded ratio of 100.7%.  Clair  Crossland asked how adopting USC and COLA would affect the contribution rate in the future.   Ms. Hanford said that, based on the projection results provided by TMRS, the contribution rate  will remain stable through 2015 and then start to drop with a projected contribution of 8.06%  in 2019.  The funded ratio is projected to remain above 100%.  After discussion, Blair Mercer  moved that the committee recommend adopting Updated Service Credits and Retiree COLA as  proposed.  Angela Fontana seconded the motion.  The vote was unanimous in favor.    The committee then discussed the City’s proposed contribution to the Self‐Insurance Fund.  Ms.  Hanford explained that two years ago, the City had dropped the contribution to the self‐ insurance fund to $750 per employee per month.  For the past two years, the health plan has  remained in the black.  In 2012, claims and expenses have increased to the point that the health  plan has just been breaking even with five months to go in the plan year.  Ms. Hanford told the  committee that, even though claims and expenses were expected to increase, without renewal  figures for 2013, the decision had been made to maintain the current level of funding and cover  whatever shortages occurred with fund balance.  Mr. Lambourn told the committee that he had  done some calculations on the City’s claims and contributions, and after calculating the industry  trend for expected increases in claims and stop loss insurance, his figures indicated that there  would probably be a shortfall of $350,000 to $450,000 in the plan for by the end of 2013  resulting in a much higher increase in city and employee contributions over the next two years.   There was a lengthy discussion regarding the projected shortfall and various solutions.  The  committee discussed what effect “Obamacare” would have on the plan.  Ms. Hanford told the  committee that the city’s health plan was still in “grandfathered status.”  Mr. Lambourn  explained that “grandfathered status” would be lost if plan changes or premium changes  resulted in an increase of more than 5%.  Then, the city would have to comply with all of the  current provisions of “Obamacare.”  In 2014, grandfathered status will go away and all  provisions will have to be complied with.  More discussion followed.  Ms. Hanford pointed out  that if the upcoming plan renewal indicated the need to make changes to the plan or to  contributions, plan changes could be made later and a budget amendment could be adopted  later in the budget year, if necessary.  The renewal from Cigna has not been received yet, and it  merits review prior to a final decision.  Mr. Lambourn asked Ms. Hanford to contact the city’s  broker, Holmes Murphy, to request that the renewal be presented in early September.  After  additional discussion, Clair Crossland moved that the committee recommend the health plan  budget as proposed with the caveat that increases or other changes may be recommended  after a review of the health plan renewal.  Blair Mercer seconded the motion.  The vote in favor  was unanimous.    Councilmember Bob Begert thanked the committee members for their service and told them  that he continued to be impressed by the amount of knowledge and expertise committee  members brought to the process.  The committee members then watched a training video on  ethics.  The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 am.    ________________________________________ ___________________________________  Roger Lambourn, Chairman    Luanne Hanford, Director of HR    AGENDAMEMO (9/4/2012AGENDA) TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil FROM:KentR.Austin,DirectorofFinance SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onapprovalofanordinanceadoptingtheFY2013budget BACKGROUND: SeepreviousagendaitemregardingpublichearingandfinalpresentationofproposedFY2013budget. RECOMMENDATION: ApprovetheordinanceadoptingtheFY2013budget.Thetotalbudgetof$44,275,593is2.90% higherthanlastyear's$43,027,730adoptedbudget.Thebudgetiscomprisedofthreeseparatefunds-- General,Utility,andSanitation. ATTACHMENTS: OrdinanceadoptingFY2013budget ORDINANCE NO. __________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS, ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2012, AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2013; APPROPRIATING THE VARIOUS AMOUNTS REQUIRED FOR SUCH BUDGET; PROVIDING FOR RECORDING OF THE ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council has heretofore approved the tax roll prepared and presented by the Dallas Central Appraisal District as required by the Tax Code; and WHEREAS, the City Manager of the City of University Park has submitted to the City Council a proposed budget of the revenues and expenditures of conducting the affairs of the City and providing a complete financial plan for 2012-2013; and WHEREAS, the City Council has received the City Manager's proposed budget, a copy of which proposed budget and all supporting schedules have been filed with the City Secretary of the City of University Park; and WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted the necessary public hearings as required by law; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the proposed budget of the revenues and expenditures of conducting the affairs of the City of University Park, providing a complete financial plan for the ensuing fiscal year beginning October 1, 2012, and ending September 30, 2013, as submitted to the City Council by the City Manager, be, and the same is hereby, in all things adopted and approved as the budget of all current revenues and expenditures of the City for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2012, and ending September 30, 2013. SECTION 2. That the sum of $4,275,593 is hereby appropriated for the payment of the expenditures established in the approved budget, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made part hereof for all purposes. SECTION 3. That the City Council reserves the authority to transfer appropriations budgeted from one account or activity to another within any individual activity of the City and to transfer appropriations from designated appropriations to any individual department or activity. That all transfers of appropriations budgeted from one account or activity to another within any individual activity for the fiscal year 2011-2012 are hereby ratified and the Budget Ordinance for 2011-2012, heretofore enacted by the City Council, be, and the same is hereby, amended to the extent of such transfers for all purposes. SECTION 4. That all notices and public hearings required by law have been duly completed. That the City Secretary is directed to provide a certified copy of the budget ordinance to the County Clerk of Dallas County for recording after final passage hereof. SECTION 5. That all ordinances of the City of University Park in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same are hereby, repealed. SECTION 6. That should any sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole or any part or provision thereof other than the part thereof decided to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid. SECTION 7. This ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage as the law and Charter in such cases provide. DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of University Park, Texas, on the 4th day of September, 2012. APPROVED: ____________________________________ W. RICHARD DAVIS, MAYOR ATTEST: ____________________________________ CITY SECRETARY ELIZABETH SPECTOR APPROVED AS TO FORM: ________________________________ CITY ATTORNEY EXHIBIT “A” CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS FY2013 PROPOSED BUDGET BY FUND AND DEPARTMENT 8/7/2012 Fund / Org Unit / Department FY2011 Actual FY2012 Adopted Budget FY2013 Proposed Budget $ Change% Change GENERAL FUND Revenues 01-11 REVENUES $29,720,043$26,758,000$27,286,305$528,3051.97% Total Revenues $29,720,043$26,758,000$27,286,305$528,3051.97% Expenditures 01-02 EXECUTIVE $1,166,906$1,187,135$947,218 ($239,917)-20.21% 01-03 FINANCE $1,192,3861,059,604$1,023,093 ($36,511)-3.45% 01-04 HUMAN RESOURCES $351,049 363,849$354,043 ($9,806)-2.70% 01-05 INFORMATION SERVICES $918,087 996,662$980,320 ($16,342)-1.64% 01-06 LIBRARY $0 0$600,000 $600,000#DIV/0! 01-10 COURT $310,298 331,720$341,706 $9,9863.01% 01-19 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT $1,023,2811,016,899$1,155,595 $138,69613.64% 01-20 ENGINEERING $777,939 744,212$750,505 $6,2930.85% 01-25 TRAFFIC $810,201 848,934$862,322 $13,3881.58% 01-35 FACILITY MAINTENANCE $748,700 755,293$581,232 ($174,061)-23.05% 01-40 FIRE $4,957,7414,860,342$5,040,718 $180,3763.71% 01-50 POLICE $6,509,9826,666,922$6,795,268 $128,3461.93% 01-70 PARKS $2,819,7702,834,510$2,745,922 ($88,588)-3.13% 01-75 SWIMMING POOL $272,103 269,583$275,869 $6,2862.33% 01-80 STREETS $1,737,5301,756,234$1,775,323 $19,0891.09% 01-85 TRANSFERS $3,407,1963,032,187$3,032,187 $00.00% Total Expenditures $27,003,169$26,724,086$27,261,321$537,2352.01% General Fund Surplus/(Deficit)$2,716,874 $33,914 $24,984 ($8,930)-26.33% UTILITY FUND Revenues 02-11 REVENUES 14,386,443$          $13,445,004$14,250,997$805,9935.99% Total Revenues $14,386,44313,445,004$ 14,250,997$ $805,9935.99% Expenditures 02-21 UTILITY OFFICE $7,942,476$7,882,997$8,428,704 $545,7076.92% 02-22 UTILITIES 3,505,3983,266,3063,365,480 $99,1743.04% 02-23 STORM WATER 72,965 90,450 252,870 $162,420179.57% 02-85 TRANSFERS 2,195,4152,195,4152,195,415 $00.00% Total Expenditures $13,716,254$13,435,168$14,242,469$807,3016.01% Utility Fund Surplus/(Deficit)$670,189 $9,836 $8,528 ($1,308)-13.30% SANITATION FUND Revenues 04-11 REVENUES $2,953,835$3,070,451$2,937,660 ($132,791)-4.32% Tot al Revenues $2,953,835$3,070,451$2,937,660 ($132,791)-4.32% Expenditures 04-60 SANITATION $2,686,568$2,868,476$2,771,803 ($96,673)-3.37% Tot al Expenditures $2,686,568$2,868,476$2,771,803 ($96,673)-3.37% Sanitation Fund Surplus/(Deficit)$267,267$201,975$165,857 ($36,118)-17.88% TOTAL REVENUES $47,060,321$43,273,455$44,474,962$1,201,5072.78% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 43,405,99143,027,73044,275,593$1,247,8632.90% TOTAL SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)$3,654,330$245,725$199,369 ($46,356) AGENDAMEMO (9/4/2012AGENDA) TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil FROM:KentR.Austin,DirectorofFinance SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onapprovalofanordinancelevyingthe2012propertytax BACKGROUND: Seetheagendaitemtitled"Publichearing--finalpresentationofproposedFY2013budget." RECOMMENDATION: Approvetheordinancesettingthe2012(FY2013)propertytaxrateof$0.27845per$100taxable value.Thisisthesametaxrateas2010and2011(FY2011andFY2012). ATTACHMENTS: Ordinancelevying2012propertytaxrate ORDINANCE NO. _____________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS, LEVYING THE AD VALOREM TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 ON ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK AS OF JANUARY 1, 2012, TO PROVIDE REVENUES FOR THE PAYMENT OF CURRENT EXPENDITURES; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, all notices have been given and public hearings held as required by law to adopt a tax rate for 2012; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That there be and is hereby levied for the year 2012, on all taxable property, real, personal and mixed, situated within the limits of the City of University Park, Texas as of January 1, 2012, and not exempt by the Constitution of the State and valid State laws, a tax of $0.27845 on each $100.00 assessed valuation of taxable property, and such taxes shall be apportioned and distributed as follows: (A) $0.27845 on each and every $100.00 valuation of said property is hereby levied and assessed to provide revenues for maintenance and operations of City government and current expenses thereof; and (B) That no rate is set for debt service because the City of University Park currently has no bonded indebtedness. SECTION 2. That all ad valorem taxes shall become due and payable on October 1, 2012, and all ad valorem taxes for the year shall become delinquent after January 31, 2013. That in addition to any statutory exemptions for the 2012 tax year, the City Council hereby authorizes a General Homestead Exemption of twenty percent (20%) of the assessed value and an Over Sixty- five Years of Age and Disabled Exemption of $275,000.00 on the assessed value. SECTION 3. That a delinquent tax shall incur all penalty and interest authorized by law, including a penalty of six percent (6%) on the amount of the tax for the first calendar month it is delinquent, plus one percent (1%) for each additional month or portion of a month the tax remains unpaid prior to July 1 of the year in which it becomes delinquent. A tax delinquent on July 1 incurs a total penalty of twelve percent (12%) of the amount of the delinquent tax, without regard to the number of months the tax has been delinquent. A delinquent tax shall also accrue at the rate of one percent (1%) for each month or portion of a month the tax remains unpaid. Taxes that remain delinquent on July 1, 2013, incur an additional penalty of fifteen percent (15%) of the amount of the taxes, penalty and interest due. Such additional penalty is to defray costs of collection due to a contract with the City's tax collection attorney pursuant to Section 33.07 of the Tax Code. SECTION 4. That all ordinances of the City of University Park in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed. SECTION 5. That should any sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole or any part or provision thereof other than the part thereof decided to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid. SECTION 6. This ordinance shall take effect on October 1, 2012. DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of University Park, Texas, on the 4th day of September, 2012. APPROVED: ____________________________________ W. RICHARD DAVIS, MAYOR ATTEST: ___________________________________________ CITY SECRETARY ELIZABETH SPECTOR APPROVED AS TO FORM: ________________________________ CITY ATTORNEY AGENDAMEMO (9/4/2012AGENDA) TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil FROM:KentR.Austin,DirectorofFinance SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onordinanceadoptingFY2013payplan BACKGROUND: Seeagendaitemtitled"publichearing--FY2013proposedbudgetfinalpresentation." RECOMMENDATION: ApprovetheordinanceadoptingtheFY2013payplan,whichsupportstheFY2013budget.Theplan includesa3%market-basedpayincreaseforallfull-timeemployees.About15%ofemployeesare eligibleforanadditional3%meritincrease.. ATTACHMENTS: OrdinanceadoptingFY2013payplan ORDINANCE NO. ______ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS, REPEALING AND REPLACING ORDINANCE NO. 11/22 AND ORDINANCE NO. 12/01 BY ADOPTING A REVISED PAY PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK FOR FY 2012-2013, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS: Ordinance No. 11/22 AND Ordinance No. 12/01 are repealed and the following ordinance is adopted to replace them: SECTION I As provided in Chapter 8, Article 8.500, of the Code of Ordinances of the City of University Park, Texas, a pay plan to compensate employees of the City of University Park for FY 2012-2013 is adopted to wit: 1. PAY PLAN BY CATEGORIES: EXEMPT EMPLOYEES _____________________________________________________________________________________ TITLE POINTS MIN. MARKET MAX. CITY MANAGER E 950 15721 CITY JUDGE E 930 3789 CITY PROSECUTOR E 920 2868 DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS E 904 9937 11503 13736 DIRECTOR OF FINANCE E 755 8674 10041 11990 FIRE CHIEF E 732 8480 9817 11722 DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES E 677 8014 9277 11077 DIRECTOR OF PARKS E 636 7666 8874 10596 DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT E 611 7455 8630 10305 CITY ENGINEER E 611 7455 8630 10305 POLICE CAPTAIN E 594 7311 8463 10106 ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF E 594 7311 8463 10106 DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION SERVICES E 588 7259 8403 10034 CONTROLLER E 551 6945 8040 9600 ASST. DIR. OF PUBLIC WORKS E 551 6945 8040 9600 LIBRARY DIRECTOR E 511 6585 7260 9102 INFRASTRUCTURE MAINT. SUPT. E 479 6402 7411 8849 CHIEF PLANNING OFFICIAL E 466 6140 7108 8487 CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL E 466 6140 7108 8487 SANITATION SUPERINTENDENT E 421 5845 6766 8079 FLEET MANAGER E 406 5719 6620 7905 CIP COORDINATOR/CONST. MANAGER E 393 5617 6502 7764 SR. NETWORK ADMINISTRATOR E 393 5617 6502 7764 COMMUNITY INFORMATION OFFICER E 382 5516 6385 7625 CITY SECRETARY E 382 5516 6385 7625 TRAFFIC SUPERINTENDENT E 366 5381 6229 7438 ACCOUNTING MANAGER E 344 5194 6013 7179 NETWORK SUPPORT SPECIALIST E 344 5194 6013 7179 GIS COORDINATOR E 344 5194 6013 7179 ASSET MANAGEMENT COORDINATOR E 344 5194 6013 7179 RIGHT OF WAY MANAGER E 344 5194 6013 7179 PURCHASING AGENT E 332 5071 5870 7009 POLICE ACCREDITATION MGR (PT) E 332 5071 5870 7009 POLICE COMM./RECORDS SUPERVISOR E 332 5071 5870 7009 ASSISTANT PARK DIRECTOR E 318 4975 5759 6877 PARKS SUPERINTENDENT E 318 4975 5759 6877 COURT ADMINISTRATOR E 308 4888 5658 6757 ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER E 298 4860 5626 6718 TECHNICAL SERVICES LIBRARIAN E 298 4860 5626 6718 CHILDREN’S LIBRARIAN E 298 4860 5626 6718 UTILITY BILLING MANAGER E 291 4745 5493 6559 ASSTISTANT CITY SECRETARY (PT) E 223 3949 4571 5459 NON-EXEMPT EMPLOYEES _____________________________________________________________________________________ TITLE GRADE PTS. MIN. MARKET MAX. CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR N 58 296 4663 5398 6446 BUILDING INSPECTOR III N 58 296 4663 5398 6446 EQUIP. SHOP SUPERVISOR N 57 269 4330 5013 5985 SANITATION CREW LEADER N 57 269 4330 5013 5985 MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR N 57 269 4330 5013 5985 BUILDING INSPECTOR II N 57 269 4330 5013 5985 BUILDING INSPECTOR I N 56 245 4037 4673 5580 WAREHOUSE SUPERVISOR N 56 245 4037 4673 5580 CODE ENFORCEMENT OFCR. N 56 245 4037 4673 5580 ENGINEERING TECH. N 56 245 4037 4673 5580 TRAFFIC TECHNICIAN II N 56 245 4037 4673 5580 EQUIP SERVICES TECH-ELECTRONICS N 56 245 4037 4673 5580 PAYROLL/AP SPECIALIST N 56 245 4037 4673 5580 FIRE ADMIN. ASSISTANT N 55 216 3680 4260 5087 POLICE ADMIN. ASSISTANT N 55 216 3680 4260 5087 HUMAN RESOURCES ASSISTANT N 55 216 3680 4260 5087 GARDENER III N 55 216 3680 4260 5087 FORESTRY TECHNICIAN N 55 216 3680 4260 5087 HORTICULTURIST N 55 216 3680 4260 5087 IRRIGATION TECHNICIAN N 55 216 3680 4260 5087 PESTICIDE TECHNICIAN N 55 216 3680 4260 5087 EQUIP. SERVICE TECHNICIAN N 55 216 3680 4260 5087 WELDING TECHNICIAN N 55 216 3680 4260 5087 DISPATCHER/311 CALL TAKER N 55 216 3680 4260 5087 PURCHASING ASSISTANT N 54 191 3373 3905 4662 PLANNING TECH N 54 191 3373 3905 4662 PERMIT TECH N 54 191 3373 3905 4662 WAREHOUSE/EQUIP SERV ASST N 54 191 3373 3905 4662 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SPECIALIST N 54 191 3373 3905 4662 FACILITIES MAINT. TECH. N 54 191 3373 3905 4662 ADMIN SECRETARY/311 CALL TAKER N 54 191 3373 3905 4662 ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER N 54 191 3373 3905 4662 SIGNS/MARKINGS TECH II N 54 191 3373 3905 4662 MAINTENANCE TECH II N 54 191 3373 3905 4662 SR. UTILITY BILLING SPECIALIST N 53 160 2993 3465 4137 ADMIN. SECRETARY N 53 160 2993 3465 4137 PARKING ENFORCEMENT OFFICER N 53 160 2993 3465 4137 SANITATION DRIVER III N 53 160 2993 3465 4137 TRAFFIC TECHNICIAN I N 53 160 2993 3465 4137 POLICE ALARM PERMIT CLERK N 53 160 2993 3465 4137 RECEPTIONIST/311 CALL TAKER N 53 160 2993 3465 4137 SIGNS/MARKINGS TECH I N 52 143 2783 3222 3847 LEAD CUSTODIAN N 52 143 2783 3222 3847 CID CLERK (PT) N 52 143 2783 3222 3847 COMMUNITY DEV. CLERK (PT) N 52 143 2783 3222 3847 UTILITY BILLING SPECIALIST N 52 143 2783 3222 3847 MAIL/UTILITY BILLING SPECIALIST N 52 143 2783 3222 3847 DEPUTY COURT CLERK N 52 143 2783 3222 3847 SANITATION DRIVER II N 52 143 2783 3222 3847 GARDENER II N 52 143 2783 3222 3847 MAINTENANCE TECH I N 52 143 2783 3222 3847 SANITATION DRIVER I N 51 119 2488 2880 3439 WAREHOUSE PARTS RUNNER N 51 119 2488 2880 3439 GARDENER I N 50 99 2244 2598 3102 POLICE DEPARTMENT _____________________________________________________________________________________ TITLE STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 4 STEP 5 STEP 6 _____________________________________________________________________________________ POLICE LT. 7079 7432 POLICE SGT. 6421 6742 POLICE OFFICER 4711 4947 5194 5454 5726 6013 POLICE RECRUIT 4266 4479 FIRE DEPARTMENT _____________________________________________________________________________________ TITLE STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 4 STEP 5 STEP 6 _____________________________________________________________________________________ BATTALION CHIEF 7478 7852 FIRE CAPTAIN 6787 7126 ASST. FIRE MARSHAL 6477 FIRE LIEUTENANT 6477 DRIVER/ENGINEER 6157 FIREFIGHTER 4488 4712 4948 5195 5455 5728 FF RECRUIT 3989 PART TIME AND TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES Pay to be determined by the Director of Human Resources. 2. PAY PLAN ADMINISTRATION: (a) Non-uniformed Pay Plan. The pay plan presented herein for positions except uniformed police and fire defines the range of pay for each position in the city. There will be two steps between minimum and market, with minimum designated as Step 1 and market pay designated as Step 4, that range being designated as the desired hiring and probationary range. Market pay (Step 4) of each range is considered the rate of pay for a fully trained, competent employee. There will be five steps between market pay and maximum, with maximum designated as Step 10, that range being designated for merit pay. Progression from one step to the next higher step shall be based solely on performance as approved by the department head or city manager and will be effective on an employee’s evaluation date. (b) Uniformed Police and Fire Pay Plan. In order to receive a step increase, each employee must meet the time-in-service requirement and have a performance evaluation that is at least “Meets Expectations.” If an employee does not meet the performance evaluation requirement, the supervisor may set a time for re- evaluation and reconsideration of the step increase if improved performance is recognized. 3, ASSIGNMENT PAY: Paramedic and Fire Inspector positions are not specified as rank, but are designated as an assignment and receive assignment pay as follows: 0-4 YRS OF SERVICE $175/MO ASSIGNMENT PAY 5-9 YRS OF SERVICE $250/MO ASSIGNMENT PAY 10-14 YRS OF SERVICE $325/MO ASSIGNMENT PAY 15+ YRS OF SERVICE $400/MO ASSIGNMENT PAY FIRE INSPECTOR $100 PER MONTH ASSIGNMENT PAY EMS SHIFT LT. $200 PER MONTH ASSIGNMENT PAY Paramedic and Fire Inspector assignment pay will be in addition to the pay allocated for the rank at the time of assignment. For example, a Firefighter assigned as paramedic will receive the pay for a Firefighter plus assignment pay appropriate to his/her years of service as a certified paramedic in the University Park Fire Department (designated above) plus $35 for each shift assigned to the MICU. Fire Department employees will not be eligible for assignment pay while on leave for any reason. Police officers assigned to CID and the Warrant Officer will receive an assignment pay of 5% of base pay. Field Training Officers will receive assignment pay of 5% of base pay when assigned and working as a Field Training Officer. 911/311 Dispatchers assigned to training duty will receive an assignment pay of 5% of base pay when assigned and working as a trainer. 4. WORK EXPERIENCE PERIOD: The work experience period is one year under normal circumstances for uniformed police and fire and six months for all other employees. Nothing herein prevents the extension of a work experience period or prevents any department head from delaying or withholding pay increases for just and compelling reasons. 5. SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL PAY: Dispatchers who work the evening shift will receive an additional pay of $25 per month. Police Officers, Police Sergeants, Police Lieutenants, and Dispatchers who work deep night shift will receive an additional pay of $50 per month. These employees must maintain a performance evaluation that “Meets Expectations” in order to be eligible for the shift differential pay. 6. LONGEVITY: All police and fire personnel shall receive the State of Texas mandated payment of four dollars ($4.00) per month for each year of service up to a maximum of 25 years. All other employees of the City shall receive longevity pay at the same rate as police and fire personnel. For the purpose of this section, longevity accrual begins at the start of each month after the anniversary date, unless such anniversary date is on the first of the month. 7. EDUCATION AND CERTIFICATION PAY: (a) Uniformed personnel in the Fire Department shall receive incentive pay for college credit hours from an accredited university. This plan does not include the rank of Captain or higher except as designated below. Fire Lieutenant is eligible for education pay only for eighteen hours and above. 1. Twelve (12) hours $20.00 per month 2. Eighteen (18) hours $30.00 per month 3. Thirty-six (36) hours $40.00 per month 4. Assoc. degree or 60 hours $50.00 per month 5. Bachelor’s degree $100.00 per month Fire Captains will be eligible for incentive pay for college credit hours from an accredited university under the following plan: 1. 36 hours $40.00 per month 2. Assoc. degree or 60 hours $50.00 per month 3. Bachelor’s degree $100.00 per month Fire Battalion Chiefs will be eligible for incentive pay for college credit hours from an accredited university under the following plan: 1. Bachelor’s degree $100.00 per month The Fire Chief must review and approve the subjects and the plan of study prior to instigation by the employee in order to eligible for the pay described above. In addition to the above, uniformed Fire Department personnel will be eligible for the following incentive pay for certification beyond basic. This does not pertain to ranks of Captain and above except as designated below: 1. Intermediate $50.00 per month 2. Advanced $100.00 per month 3. Master’s $150.00 per month Fire Captains will be eligible for incentive pay for the following certifications: 1. Advanced $100.00 per month 2. Master’s $150.00 per month Fire Battalion Chiefs will be eligible for incentive pay for the following certifications: 1. Master’s $150.00 per month (b) Patrol Officers are eligible for educational incentive pay as follows: 1. Assoc. degree or 60 hours $ 50.00 per month 2. Bachelor’s degree $100.00 per month Police Lieutenants and Sergeants are eligible for educational incentive pay as follows: 1. Bachelor’s degree $100.00 per month In addition to the above, Patrol Officers are eligible for certification pay incentive according to the TCLEOSE certification held: 1. Intermediate $50.00 per month 2. Advanced $100.00 per month Police Lieutenants and Sergeants are eligible for certification pay incentive according to the following: 1. Advanced $100.00 per month 8. MASTER POLICE OFFICER: The Master Police Officer designation is discontinued as of 10/01/00. Any Police Officer who carries the Master Police Officer designation as of 10/01/00 will continue to hold the designation until such time he/she no longer meets the qualifications set forth below. Any Officer who loses the designation will not be eligible to regain it. The designation will continue to carry a fifty dollar ($50) per month assignment pay. The qualifications for this designation are as follows: a. Must have been with the University Park Police Department for five (5) years or with the UP Police Department for two (2) years and hold an Advanced TCLEOSE Certification; b. Must maintain a performance evaluation that “Meets Expectations” for the past two years; c. Must not have had any preventable accidents within the last eighteen (18) months; d. Must not have had any suspensions within two (2) years, any written reprimands within one (1) year, or any oral reprimands within the past six (6) months; e. Must complete Field Training Officer School and must qualify and perform as a Field Training Officer; f. Upon obtaining the Master Police Officer designation, the officer must successfully complete both basic supervision and intermediate traffic accident training; g. Must demonstrate proficiency with service weapons; and h. Must complete one Criminal Investigation school. 9. OVERTIME PAY: Overtime pay will be applied as described in Administrative Order PRS-4. 10. APPLICATION OF PAY PLAN: The pay plan, as outlined above, applies only to regular full-time employees (except for overtime provisions). 11. APPROVAL OF CHANGES IN CLASSIFICATION: The city manager shall have authority to approve all changes in classification; however, the number of classification changes subject to his/her approval shall not exceed 10% of total employees during the fiscal year. 12. INTERPRETATION: From time to time, it may be necessary to interpret the pay plan for its applicability to certain unforeseen circumstances. The city manager may issue an administrative order interpreting the pay plan for specific circumstances; however, all such interpretation may be appealed to the City Council within fifteen (15) days. SECTION II This ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage as the law and charter in such cases provide, provided that the pay plan to be given effect hereby shall take effect on October 1, 2012. DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of University Park, Texas, on the 4th day of September, 2012. APPROVED: ___________________________________ MAYOR APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: ______________________________ ___________________________________ CITY ATTORNEY (RLD/12-02-09/40795) CITY SECRETARY AGENDAMEMO (9/4/2012AGENDA) TO:HonorableMayorandCityCouncil FROM:KentR.Austin,DirectorofFinance SUBJECT:CONSIDERANDACT:onanordinanceupdatingTMRSservicecredits BACKGROUND: SeeagendaitemonFY2013proposedbudgetfinalpresentationandattachedmemofromDirectorof HumanResourcesLuanneHanford. RECOMMENDATION: ApprovetheordinanceupdatingTMRSservicecreditsandapprovingaCOLA(costofliving adjustment)forcurrentretirees. ATTACHMENTS: MemofromHRDirectorLuanneHanford OrdinanceadoptingTMRSUSCandCOLA Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Luanne Hanford, Director of Human Resources Date: 8/30/2012 Re: TMRS Updating Service Credits/COLA Ordinance for FY2013 With this memo, I am submitting an ordinance to adopt Updated Service Credits (USC) at 100% and a Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) of 70% for city retirees in the Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS). Updating service credits takes into consideration an employee’s salary changes and any plan changes adopted by the city over time and assumes those increases and changes have been in effect throughout the employee’s career. Updating Service Credits is designed to help career members’ benefits maintain their value. The proposed retiree COLA will increase the retirees’ benefits by 70% of the increase in the Consumer Price Index since the last time the COLA was adopted. The City last adopted USC and retiree COLA effective January 1, 2009. A retiree COLA cannot be adopted without adopting Updated Service Credits. In 2012, the City’s TMRS contribution rate dropped from 13.10% to 7.50%. However, the City chose to contribute 10% to “pay ahead.” Paying more than the required contribution rate, along with changes made by TMRS in calculating contribution rates, has resulted in a negative unfunded actuarial liability (i.e., an actuarial asset) for the city of about $2.9 million and a funded ratio of 103.2%. If the city adopts USC and retiree COLA, the unfunded actuarial liability will be negative $462,000 and the Funded Ratio will be 100.7%. The contribution rate will be 8.26%. Without the changes, the rate would be 6.8%. The proposed budget presumes an 8.26% rate, versus the current 10%. According to projection results from TMRS, the long-term effect of adopting USC and retiree COLA is that the City’s contribution rate will remain stable through 2015 and then start to drop with a projected 8.06% in 2019. The funded ratio is projected to remain above 100% through 2019 unless other plan changes are adopted. The Employee Benefits Committee met on August 28, 2012, to review proposed pay and benefit changes in the FY2013 budget. After consideration and discussion, the committee voted in favor of recommending adoption of Updated Service Credits and retiree COLA effective January 1, 2013. The Committee minutes are included with the budget documents. Staff recommends approval of the ordinance adopting TMRS Updated Service Credits at 100% and Retiree COLA at 70%. ORDINANCE NO. _______________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING AND ALLOWING, UNDER THE ACT GOVERNING THE TEXAS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM, "UPDATED SERVICE CREDITS” IN SAID SYSTEM FOR SERVICE PERFORMED BY QUALIFYING MEMBERS OF SUCH SYSTEM WHO PRESENTLY ARE EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY; PROVIDING FOR INCREASED PRIOR AND CURRENT SERVICE ANNUITIES FOR RETIREES AND BENEFICIARIES OF DECEASED RETIREES OF THE CITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE FOR SUCH ACTIONS. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS: Section 1. Authorization of Updated Service Credits. (a) On the terms and conditions set out in Sections 853.401 through 853.403 of Subtitle G of Title 8, Government Code, as amended (hereinafter referred to as the "TMRS Act"), each member of the Texas Municipal Retirement System (hereinafter referred to as the "System") who has current service credit or prior service credit in the System in force and effect on the 1st day of January of the calendar year preceding such allowance, by reason of service in the employment of the City of University Park, and on such date had at least 36 months of credited service with the System, shall be and is hereby allowed "Updated Service Credit" (as that term is defined in subsection (d) of Section 853.402 of said title) in an amount that is 100% of the "base Updated Service Credit" of the member (calculated as provided in subsection (c) of Section 853.402 of said title). The Updated Service Credit hereby allowed shall replace any Updated Service Credit, prior service credit, special prior service credit, or antecedent service credit previously authorized for part of the same service. (b) In accordance with the provisions of subsection (d) of Section 853.401 of said title, the deposits required to be made to the System by employees of the several participating departments on account of current service shall be calculated from and after the date aforesaid on the full amount of such person's earnings as an employee of the City. Section 2. Increase in Retirement Annuities. (a) On terms and conditions set out in Section 854.203 of Subtitle G of Title 8, Government Code, as amended, the City hereby elects to allow and to provide for payment of the increases below stated in monthly benefits payable by the System to retired employees and to beneficiaries of deceased employees of the City under current service annuities and prior service annuities arising from service by such employees to this City. An annuity increased under this Section replaces any annuity or increased annuity previously granted to the same person. (b) The amount of the annuity increase under this Section is computed as the sum of the prior service and current service annuities on the effective date of retirement of the person on whose service the annuities are based, multiplied by 70% of the percentage change in Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, from December of the year immediately preceding the effective date of the person's retirement to the December that is 13 months before the effective date of this Section. (c) An increase in an annuity that was reduced because of an option selection is reducible in the same proportion and in the same manner that the original annuity was reduced. (d) If a computation hereunder does not result in an increase in the amount of an annuity, the amount of the annuity will not be changed hereby. (e) The amount by which an increase under this Section exceeds all previously granted increases to an annuitant is an obligation of this City and of its account in the municipality accumulation fund of the System. Section 3 Effective Date. Subject to approval by the Board of Trustees of the System, this ordinance shall be and become effective on the 1st day of January 2013, as the law and Charter provide in such cases. Duly passed and approved by the City Council of the City of University Park, Texas, on the ________ day of _____________________2012. ATTEST: APPROVED: BY: BY: LIZ SPECTOR, CITY SECRETARY W. RICHARD DAVIS, MAYOR APPROVED AS TO FORM: ______________________________________ CITY ATTORNEY (RLD/8-8-12/56840)