Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015.01.06 City Council AgendaCity Council City of University Park Meeting Agenda City Hall 3800 University Blvd. University Park, TX 75205 Council Chamber5:00 PMTuesday, January 6, 2015 PRE-MEETING WORK SESSION(S) 4:30 - 5:00 P.M. The City Council will meet in open work session to receive agenda item briefings from staff. No action will be taken. Council Conference Room, 2nd floor, City Hall. TO SPEAK ON AN AGENDA ITEM Anyone wishing to address the Council on any item must fill out a green “Request to Speak” form and return it to the City Secretary. When called forward by the Mayor, before beginning their remarks, speakers are asked to go to the podium and state their name and address for the record. I.CALL TO ORDER A.INVOCATION: Community Information Officer Steve Mace B.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Community Information Officer Steve Mace / Boy Scouts C.INTRODUCTION OF COUNCIL: Mayor Olin Lane, Jr. D.INTRODUCTION OF STAFF: City Manager Robbie Corder II.AWARDS AND RECOGNITION III.CONSENT AGENDA Consider approval of the minutes from the December 16, 2014 City Council Meeting with or without corrections. 14-258 Staff Report City Council Meeting Minutes - December 16, 2014.pdf Attachments: IV.MAIN AGENDA Page 1 City of University Park Printed on 1/2/2015 January 6, 2015City Council Meeting Agenda Consider an ordinance designating part of the 2900 block of Daniel in a Residential Parking District. 14-256 Staff Report Ordinance Daniel Residential Parking Attachments: Consider award of a contract to Ark Contracting for construction of a water main along Hillcrest, south from Daniel to Potomac. 14-257 Staff Report Bid Tabulation Attachments: V.PUBLIC COMMENTS Anyone wishing to address an item not on the Agenda should do so at this time. Please be advised that under the Texas Open Meetings Act, the Council cannot discuss or act at this meeting on a matter that is not listed on the Agenda. However, in response to an inquiry, a Council member may respond with a statement of specific factual information or a recitation of existing policy. Other questions or private comments for the City Council or Staff should be directed to that individual immediately following the meeting. VI.ADJOURNMENT As authorized by Section 551.071(2) of the Texas Government Code, this meeting may be convened into Closed Executive Session for the purpose of seeking confidential legal advice from the City Attorney on any Agenda items listed herein. Page 2 City of University Park Printed on 1/2/2015 3800 UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS 75205 TELEPHONE (214) 363-1644 C:\Users\GRANIC~1\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 7\@BCL@C4052C54\@BCL@C4052C54.docx 3:02 PM 12/31/14 AGENDA MEMO 1/6/2015Agenda TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM:Christine Green, City Secretary SUBJECT:Minutes of the December 16, 2014 City Council Meeting Minutes of the December 16, 2014 City Council Meeting are included for the Council’s review. City Hall 3800 University Blvd. University Park, TX 75205 City of University Park Meeting Minutes City Council 5:00 PM Council ChamberTuesday, December 16, 2014 EXECUTIVE SESSION 3:34 - 4:35 P.M. Pursuant to TGC§ 551.074, the City Council met in closed session to discuss a proposed contract amendment for City Manager Robbie Corder. No action was taken. Executive Conference Room, 1st Floor, City Hall. PRE-MEETING WORK SESSION(S) 4:40 - 5:00 P.M. The City Council will met in open work session to receive agenda item briefings from staff. No action was taken. Council Conference Room, 2nd floor, City Hall. CALL TO ORDERI. Councilmember Bob Begert, Councilmember Dawn Moore, Councilmember Tommy Stewart, Councilmember Taylor Armstrong and Mayor Olin Lane Present:5 - INVOCATION: Mayor Pro Tem Bob BegertA. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Pro Tem Bob Begert / Boy ScoutsB. INTRODUCTION OF COUNCIL: Mayor Olin Lane, Jr.C. INTRODUCTION OF STAFF: City Manager Robbie CorderD. Staff in attendance included Community Information Officer Steve Mace, Director of Information Services Dale Harwell, Chief of Police Greg Spradlin, Director of Public Works Bud Smallwood, City Secretary Christine Green, Director of Parks and Recreation Gerry Bradley, Acting Community Development Director Jacob Speer, Fire Chief Randy Howell, Library Director Sharon Martin, Assistant to the City Manager George Ertle, Director of Finance Tom Tvardzik, Director of Human Resources Luanne Hanford, Purchasing Manager Elizabeth Anderson, and Aquatic Supervisor Jennifer Post. AWARDS AND RECOGNITIONII. None Page 1City of University Park December 16, 2014City Council Meeting Minutes CONSENT AGENDAIII. 14-248 Consider award of Bid # 2015-01 for Utility Parts - Annual Contract City Manager Corder said that this item is the award of contracts for utility parts. These utility parts are stocked by the Warehouse for issue to the Utilities Division for the repair and maintenance of the City’s water and wastewater infrastructure. This award will establish a one year initial contract period with one optional one year renewal. In some cases, staff recommends awarding secondary and tertiary vendors for high demand items. The secondary and tertiary vendors will be called only if the primary vendor is unable to supply the requested item at the contracted price. The total estimated annual expenditure if all items are purchased in the quantities listed is $270,306.28 with a potential additional $43,245.70 spent if a Primary vendor cannot provide a part. This cost would replace the Primary vendor’s cost. This bid award was approved. 14-254 Consider approval of the minutes of the December 2, 2014 City Council Meeting with or without corrections. The minutes were approved. Approval of the Consent Agenda A motion was made by Councilmember Stewart, seconded by Councilmember Armstrong, to approve the Consent Agenda. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye:Councilmember Begert, Councilmember Moore, Councilmember Stewart, Councilmember Armstrong, and Mayor Lane 5 - MAIN AGENDAIV. Page 2City of University Park December 16, 2014City Council Meeting Minutes 14-255 Presentation by Ken Ballard, Ballard King and Associates, Ltd., of Feasibility Study to Assess the Viability of Developing Shared Indoor Pool/Aquatic Facility City Manager Corder introduced Ken Ballard of Ballard King and Associates and Dan Henke of Water Technology Inc. Mayor Lane prefaced the presentation by saying that the Council would offer a 20 minute period to hear comments from the audience after the presentation. He asked speakers to limit their comments to the findings and figures presented in the report. He said this is not a forum for additional discussions about whether a natatorium should be built in Curtis Park. He said that the feasibility study is non site-specific. He said that tonight's focus is centered on gaining insight regarding ongoing cost associated with the operation of a joint use natatorium and the economic viability of such a facility. The Council believes that this is a necessary first step that must be satisfied before proceeding with discussing specific sites, the scope of our partnership with HPISD, or the need for additional studies that focus on parking, traffic, and other concerns. Mayor Lane stated that the Council is not going to make any decisions on a joint use natatorium at tonight's meeting. This is part of a process that has been followed with other projects of similar scope, including the Park Cities YMCA, the Park Cities Baptist Church, and the Bush Presidential Center. The HPISD is also following a deliberate path. He said that the District's Facilities Committee has not finalized its recommendation for a bond package or a recommendation concerning a joint-use natatorium. Ken Ballard highlighted elements of his report. The scope of the report included: Market Analysis Community Input Summary Building Program Capital Cost Estimate Business Plan The market analysis included a demographic summary and rates of aquatic participation. Approximately 17.6% of the population in the market participates in swimming with the age group 7-11 having the highest rate of participation. Market opportunities are that a natatorium would provide an indoor pool for public use for recreation and fitness swimming and that the demographic characteristics of this community are very strong. Market constraints include competition from other indoor pools - the YMCA and SMU will have new indoor pools soon - and the proposed joint-use indoor pool will not be able to cover its cost of operation with revenues alone. The community input included stakeholder meetings, focus groups, and a community meeting on September 24. Ken Ballard covered the key findings from each community input group. Stakeholder Meetings key findings: ·The High School needs more space for classrooms. Page 3City of University Park December 16, 2014City Council Meeting Minutes ·The ISD would pay for the capital construction and the City would operate. ·The pool would be open for general community use. ·There are a number of site issues at Curtis Park and other locations will probably need to be investigated. Lack of other sites. ·Conversations were held with SMU regarding their future plans for an aquatic center. ·The new YMCA pool cannot meet the needs of the ISD. ·The current H.S. pool serves a number of other community uses: o Dallas Masters o Dallas Mustangs o Elite Swim Club o Special Olympics o YMCA ·A new pool would be used for dual and tri meets only. ·Water polo is a growing high school sport. ·The existing H.S. pool needs significant improvements. Focus Groups key findings: ·Two pools are needed, one competitive, one recreational. ·Other sites beyond Curtis Park need to be explored. ·The ISD should partner with SMU or rent pool time from the YMCA. ·There is recognition that the ISD needs more classroom space. ·There are traffic, safety, and parking concerns at Curtis Park. Community Meeting key findings: ·There is a petition with 1,000 signatures opposed to the project. ·The ISD needs to keep the pool on the H.S. campus. ·The ISD should partner with SMU and/or the YMCA. ·Other sites need to be investigated. ·The City should not have to absorb the total cost of operation. ·There are a number of concerns with the Curtis Park site: o Traffic o Loss of green space and trees o Parking o Safety of school children o Size and magnitude of the building o Capital and operating costs ·The City needs to complete the following for the project: o Traffic study o Environmental impact study o Survey of City residents o Legal assessment of the project and partnership with the ISD Ken Ballard said that the building program examined key components that should be included with this facility. He said that the building program should include the ability to plan for future needs, like water polo. He said that the Page 4City of University Park December 16, 2014City Council Meeting Minutes building should include two separate pools - a competition pool for meets and diving, and a leisure pool. He said that the building should include two pools to accommodate time demands. High use times are after school and early mornings when swim practices and community use are the highest. Depth requirements for competitive swimming and diving are different than for community swimming with children and older people. Water temperatures for competitive swimming and recreational swimming are also different and could best be accommodated by having two separate pools. Revenue for the pool would be generated more by recreational swimmers, so they should have a separate and dedicated pool for that use. The total building size would be around 43,000 square feet (about 1 acre), Parking needs would include about 135 parking spots during peak use with a need of 3/4 to 1 acre. Set-backs might require up to 1/2 acre. The total building requirement size would ideally be 2.5 - 3 acres. Ken Ballard said that the preliminary cost estimate to build this facility was developed by Water Technology, and is based on a 2014 pricing structure with a minimal site cost, surface parking only, and a 10% contingency. The bottom line cost estimate to build this facility is just under $17 million dollars. Beyond the capital cost, the business plan is based on the pool opening in 2017 or later. The premise would be that the City would operate the facility with no ISD payments for use since the school district would be paying the capital costs for the building construction. Another premise for this estimate is that no site has been determined, that the facility would be open only to residents of the ISD, and that the center would be used by outside groups for swim meets, etc. The business plan estimates for operating the natatorium facility are: Expenses All Categories Center Budget Personnel $597,105 Commodities $60,500 Contractual $267,812 Capital $15,000 TOTAL EXPENSE $940,417 Revenues All Categories Center Budget Fees $451,226 Programs $246,205 Other $9,500 TOTAL REVENUE $706,931 Councilmember Begert clarified that the feasibility study was not intended to be a study for traffic. Ken Ballard responded that traffic should be studied when a site is selected. Page 5City of University Park December 16, 2014City Council Meeting Minutes Councilmember Armstrong asked if Ken Ballard's projections were an aggregate projection for the entire community or were they net of the YMCA, the high school, the Dallas Country Club, etc. He asked if the the pool would have enough users to justify its construction. Ken Ballard responded that his use projections for the proposed facility have taken into account the demographics of the community and existing providers. Mayor Lane asked if the projected number of 300 users in the leisure pool at any one time was accurate. He said that seemed like a lot of people in a small area. Ken Ballard said that the number would be only at a peak access time and that includes people in the water and on the deck. Mayor Lane commented on the personnel number seeming high - could the personnel be cross-trained so that there aren't so many employees. Ken Ballard said that the employees would be performing multiple roles, but that the personnel cost number included in the report should not be changed. He said that during swim meets there may be as many as six lifeguards on hand. Councilmember Begert commented that many pools have trouble finding guards available to work past Labor Day as many guards are students who return to school. Ken Ballard said that most of the guards would be hired part-time and that it's easier to find part-time help on a year-round basis than on a seasonal basis. Taylor Armstrong asked Ken Ballard if there is enough demand in the community, given the existence of other community facilities, to justify the construction of this facility. Ken Ballard said "yes", that he believes the facility, if built as described, and well-run and well-maintained, would be a viable facility. Ann Burns, 3522 Rankin, asked if parking for 120 cars would be necessary for the facility. Ken Ballard confirmed this number. Ms. Burns asked what share of the revenues of the leisure pool would provide. Ken Ballard said that about two-thirds of the facility revenue would be generated by leisure pool fees. Councilmember Moore clarified that the HPISD would not be paying fees for use of the competitive pool, so the leisure pool users would be providing most of the revenue. Ann Burns asked about the proposed budget for capital improvements at the proposed facility and if it would really cover long-term building costs. Ken Ballard agreed that this number would not cover the costs of a significant capital improvement to the facility. Ken Ballard explained that the number is unrealistic for most entities to include in a capital reserve, and that it's not possible for most communities to allocate for such large contingencies. Ann Burns commented on the 120 surface parking lot requirement in the report and wanted to know if there is a plan or cost estimate for underground parking. Mayor Lane responded that this would be left to the school district to determine. Councilmember Moore clarified that the consultant could not provide a cost estimate for underground parking as there is no site selected for the facility. She wanted to know if a there was a cost estimate that included inflation if construction takes place in 2015 or 2016. Ken Ballard said that "no", they did not provide such a figure since the project has not been defined at this point. He noted that most figures in the report would have to be adjusted when the project Page 6City of University Park December 16, 2014City Council Meeting Minutes has more definition. Mayor Lane said that the school district would be responsible for determining these costs at the appropriate time. Royal Furgeson, 3441 Westminster, asked if the 2 - 4% capital replacement costs would be paid by the school district, rather than the City. Mayor Lane said that such negotiations with the school district have not taken place. Mr. Furgeson said he believes that the $15,000 annual capital budget for replacement is too low. Mayor Lane said that the City has a Capital Projects Committee that addresses these items. Mr. Furgeson believes that the school district should bear the cost of capital improvements and replacement to the facility. He asked if the City would do a traffic study and environmental impact study and a safety study if a site is determined for this proposed facility. The Mayor said yes. Grant Walsh, 3444 Westminster, said that he believes the report omitted study of the Town of Highland Park public pool. Could the pool open to HPISD residents - has this been taken into consideration. The Mayor said that the City and Town of Highland Park have a long history of working together. Councilmember Moore explained that the study took into consideration existing indoor pools, not outdoor pools. Ken Ballard said they focused on the indoor pools. Mr. Walsh asked about the daily fees - would the fees include admission to both the outdoor pool and the indoor pool when both pools are open. Ken Ballard said that this could be taken into consideration later when a site is selected and more particulars are known. Greg Brendel, 3128 Bryn Mawr Drive, suggested that eminent domain should be considered as a way to secure a site for the proposed facililty. Lon Houseman, 4436 Larchmont, said that he is opposed to the facility for the reasons of loss of park, traffic, and fiscal responsibility. He believes that the figures in the feasibility study are too low and doesn't think the City should shoulder this burden for the school district. He said that he believes that the residents of University Park do not support or want this proposed natatorium. Ken Ballard said that he hopes his report provides helpful information to the City Council given what the City knows about the project at this point and that it provides an initial step for understanding some of the dynamics and cost implications for the project. The Mayor closed the discussion and said that the joint use natatorium will be placed on the City Council meeting agenda for January 20 for further consideration. He encouraged members of the audience to send an e-mail or letter to the Council if they have other comments or concerns about the project. PUBLIC COMMENTSV. There were no speakers. Page 7City of University Park December 16, 2014City Council Meeting Minutes ADJOURNMENTVI. Page 8City of University Park 3800 UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS 75205 TELEPHONE (214) 363-1644 C:\Users\GRANIC~1\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 7\@BCL@F40590F7\@BCL@F40590F7.docx 5:32 PM 01/02/15 AGENDA MEMO 1/6/2014Agenda TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM:Gene R. Smallwood, P.E.; Director of Public Works SUBJECT:Amendment to Residential Parking District BACKGROUND: Following a request, staff surveyed the residents of the 2900 block of Danielto determine their opinion regarding a Residential Parking District for the block. Almost unanimous, property owner along the block requested all but the five lots at the east end of the block (two along the north side of the street and three along the south side)be included in the RPD. To that end, the City Attorney developed an ordinance amending the existing RPD to include the aforementioned part of the 2900 block of Daniel. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council approval of an ordinancedesignating the 2900 block of Daniel, west from 2916 Daniel to Dublin along the north curb line and west from 2925 Daniel to Dublin along the south curb, as Residential Parking Only. ORDINANCE NO. _________________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS, AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, CHAPTER12, TRAFFIC CONTROL, BY AMENDING SECTION 12.05.042 (a)(12) TO PROVIDE RESIDENT-PARKINGONLY FOR A PORTION OF THE 2900BLOCK, AND FOR THE 3000 AND 3100BLOCKSOF DANIELAVENUE; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWOHUNDRED DOLLARS ($200.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATEAND FOR THE ERECTION OF SIGNS. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS: SECTION 1.That Chapter 12,Article 12.05 “Parking”, Section 12.05.042(a),of the Codeof Ordinances, City of University Park, Texas, ishereby amendedin partas follows: "Sec. 12.05.042Zones Designated; issuance of permits (a)The following are designated as resident-parking-only zones, to wit: … (12) Thatportion of the north side of the 2900block of Daniel Avenue from 2916 Daniel Avenue west to Dublin, and on the south side of the 2900 block of Daniel Avenue from 2925 Daniel Avenue west to Dublin, and the 3000 and 3100 blocks of Daniel Avenue; …” SECTION 2. That all provisions of the Code of Ordinances of the City of University Park, Texas, in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed. SECTION 3. That should any word, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this ordinance or of the Code of Ordinances, as amended hereby, be adjudged or held to be void or unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of said ordinance or the Code of Ordinances, as amended hereby, which shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4.Any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction in the municipal court of the City of University Park, Texas, shall be punished by a fine not to exceed the sum of twohundred dollars ($200.00) for each offense. SECTION 5.That this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after the publication of the caption, as the law and Charter in such cases provide, subject to the erection of appropriate signs giving notice of the resident-parking-onlyzoneprovided for herein. DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of University Park, Texas, on the ____day of _________________2015. APPROVED: ______________________________ OLIN B. LANE, MAYOR APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: ________________________ _________________________________ CITY ATTORNEY CHRISTINE GREEN,CITY SECRETARY (RLD/12-29-14/68895) ORDINANCE NO. _________________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS, AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OFUNIVERSITY PARK, CHAPTER 12, TRAFFIC CONTROL, BY AMENDING SECTION 12.05.042 (a) (12) TO PROVIDE RESIDENT-PARKING ONLY FOR A PORTION OF THE 2900BLOCK, AND FOR THE 3000 AND 3100 BLOCKS OF DANIELAVENUE; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS ($200.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR THE ERECTION OF SIGNS. DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of University Park, Texas, on the ____day of _______________2015. APPROVED: ______________________________ MAYOR ATTEST: ______________________________ CITY SECRETARY 3800 UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS 75205 TELEPHONE (214) 363-1644 C:\Users\GRANIC~1\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 7\@BCL@C405FE4B\@BCL@C405FE4B.docx 3:02 PM 12/31/14 AGENDA MEMO 1/6/2014Agenda TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM:Gene R. Smallwood, P.E.; Director of Public Works SUBJECT:Bids for Hillcrest Water Main(Project No 44402) BACKGROUND: The 2014 Capital Improvements Fund identifies a water main project along Hillcrest, south from Daniel to Potomac. The project will improve pressure and flow characteristics to provide better fire protection along thewest side of the SMU campus and adjacent commercial development. The project was advertised in the Park Cities News on November 27th and December 4th. Five contractors responded withbids on December 22nd, with Ark Contracting submitting the low bid of $1,081,818. Funds for the project are available in the Capital Projects fund. The City Engineer reviewed the contractor’s bid documents for compliance with all specifications, and reviewed project references. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council approval of the low bid of Ark Contracting, in the amount of $1,081,818, and authorization for the City Manager to execute a contract. Bid Tabulations for Hillcrest Water Main Improvements December 22, 2014 Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Quantity Unit Description Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Base Bid W 1 1 LS Mobilization (Includes Extra Work)80,000.00 $80,000.00 20,000.00 $20,000.00 112,000.00 $112,000.00 240,000.00 $240,000.00 170,000.00 $170,000.00 W 2 7 MTH Barricades, Signs, and Traffic Handling 2,000.00 $14,000.00 1,500.00 $10,500.00 7,000.00 $49,000.00 3,000.00 $21,000.00 1,000.00 $7,000.00 W 3 15 EA Locating Existing Utilities Using Air/Vacuum Excavation, 6' depth or less per location 800.00 $12,000.00 1,500.00 $22,500.00 450.00 $6,750.00 800.00 $12,000.00 100.00 $1,500.00 W 4 15 EA Locating Existing Utilities Using Open Cut, 6' depth or less per location 1,000.00 $15,000.00 900.00 $13,500.00 350.00 $5,250.00 500.00 $7,500.00 100.00 $1,500.00 W 5 5 EA Locating Existing Utilities Using Air/Vacuum Excavation, greater than 6' depth per location 1,200.00 $6,000.00 2,500.00 $12,500.00 900.00 $4,500.00 1,200.00 $6,000.00 200.00 $1,000.00 W 6 5 EA Locating Existing Utilities Using Open Cut, greater than 6' depth per location 1,500.00 $7,500.00 1,200.00 $6,000.00 700.00 $3,500.00 750.00 $3,750.00 200.00 $1,000.00 W 7 8000 LF Sawed Breakout line-Full Depth 2.00 $16,000.00 1.30 $10,400.00 4.00 $32,000.00 4.00 $32,000.00 2.00 $16,000.00 W 8 40 SY Remove Existing 4" +/- Reinforced Concrete Sidewalk 8.00 $320.00 7.00 $280.00 7.00 $280.00 10.00 $400.00 15.00 $600.00 W 9 500 LF Remove Existing 6" +/- Reinforced Concrete Curb & Gutter 6.00 $3,000.00 5.00 $2,500.00 5.00 $2,500.00 8.00 $4,000.00 20.00 $10,000.00 W 10 100 SY Remove Existing Reinforced Concrete Alley Approach 12.00 $1,200.00 14.00 $1,400.00 8.00 $800.00 15.00 $1,500.00 30.00 $3,000.00 W 11 2445 SY Remove Asph. Concrete Pvmt. w/Reinf. Concrete Base (4" HMAC Average and 6" Concrete Base)14.00 $34,230.00 18.00 $44,010.00 9.00 $22,005.00 19.00 $46,455.00 35.00 $85,575.00 W 12 500 LF 30" Reinforced Concrete Curb and Gutter Class "C", 6 Sack, 3600 PSI@28 Days 30.00 $15,000.00 25.00 $12,500.00 25.00 $12,500.00 40.00 $20,000.00 20.00 $10,000.00 W 13 40 SY 4" Reinforced Concrete Sidewalk Class "C", 6 Sack, 3600 PSI@28 Days 80.00 $3,200.00 45.00 $1,800.00 80.00 $3,200.00 54.00 $2,160.00 100.00 $4,000.00 W 14 1400 SY Temporary Pavement Repair (2" HMAC and Recycled Concrete Mix Backfill and Compacted Selected Backfill) (Cost includes placement, maintenance, and removal) 15.00 $21,000.00 32.00 $44,800.00 13.00 $18,200.00 13.00 $18,200.00 35.00 $49,000.00 North Texas Construction Item No. Ark Contracting SYB ConstructionFlow-Line ConstructionBarson Utilities Bid Tabulations for Hillcrest Water Main Improvements December 22, 2014 W 15 2445 SY Replace Asph. Concrete Pvmt. w/Reinf. Concrete Base (4" HMAC Average and 6" Concrete Base)58.00 $141,810.00 70.00 $171,150.00 80.00 $195,600.00 105.00 $256,725.00 80.00 $195,600.00 W 16 100 SY 6" Reinforced Concrete Alley approach Class "C", 6 Sack, 3600 PSI@28 Days 76.00 $7,600.00 42.00 $4,200.00 60.00 $6,000.00 60.00 $6,000.00 100.00 $10,000.00 W 17 20 LF 20" D.I. Pipe Class 51 w/Poly Wrap w/Recycled Concrete Mix Backfill and Embedment (buried depth to top of pipe +/-84") 420.00 $8,400.00 300.00 $6,000.00 740.00 $14,800.00 256.00 $5,120.00 400.00 $8,000.00 W 18 510 LF 24" D.I. Pipe Class 51 w/Poly Wrap w/Recycled Concrete Mix Backfill and Embedment (buried depth to top of pipe +/-84") 330.00 $168,300.00 265.00 $135,150.00 455.00 $232,050.00 351.00 $179,010.00 370.00 $188,700.00 W 19 1 EA 24" Ductile Iron Butterfly Valve Flanged Ends (includes reinforced concrete supports)7,000.00 $7,000.00 10,000.00 $10,000.00 11,000.00 $11,000.00 17,000.00 $17,000.00 11,000.00 $11,000.00 W 20 1 EA 20" Ductile Iron Butterfly Valve Flanged Ends (includes reinforced concrete supports)6,000.00 $6,000.00 7,500.00 $7,500.00 10,000.00 $10,000.00 14,000.00 $14,000.00 10,000.00 $10,000.00 W 21 155 LF 8" D.I. Pipe Class 51 w/Poly Wrap w/Recycled Concrete Mix Backfill and Embedment (42" to top of pipe)110.00 $17,050.00 100.00 $15,500.00 150.00 $23,250.00 109.00 $16,895.00 190.00 $29,450.00 W 22 100 LF 12" D.I. Pipe Class 51 w/Poly Wrap w/Recycled Concrete Mix Backfill and Embedment (cut at top of pipe from 84" to 42") (50' max) 145.00 $14,500.00 150.00 $15,000.00 170.00 $17,000.00 190.00 $19,000.00 230.00 $23,000.00 W 23 2700 LF 12" D.I. Pipe Class 51 w/Poly Wrap w/Recycled Concrete Mix Backfill and Embedment (42" to top of pipe)110.00 $297,000.00 149.00 $402,300.00 170.00 $459,000.00 134.00 $361,800.00 230.00 $621,000.00 W 24 3 EA 8" Ductile Iron Resilient Wedge Gate Valve 1,200.00 $3,600.00 1,300.00 $3,900.00 1,200.00 $3,600.00 1,425.00 $4,275.00 2,500.00 $7,500.00 W 25 7 EA 12" Ductile Iron Resilient Wedge Gate Valve 2,500.00 $17,500.00 2,300.00 $16,100.00 2,100.00 $14,700.00 2,625.00 $18,375.00 4,000.00 $28,000.00 W 26 1 EA 2" Air Release Valve (location to be determined in field) (Service length estimated to be 30')9,000.00 $9,000.00 6,000.00 $6,000.00 9,000.00 $9,000.00 5,350.00 $5,350.00 5,000.00 $5,000.00 W 27 1 EA Connect to Existing Water Line (24" to 24") Per Location 8,000.00 $8,000.00 6,000.00 $6,000.00 4,200.00 $4,200.00 9,000.00 $9,000.00 9,000.00 $9,000.00 W 28 1 EA Connect to Existing Water Line (20" to 20") Per Location 8,000.00 $8,000.00 5,000.00 $5,000.00 3,900.00 $3,900.00 8,000.00 $8,000.00 8,000.00 $8,000.00 W 29 1 EA Connect 12" Prop Water Line to 10" Water Meter Vault @ Binkley 3,000.00 $3,000.00 5,000.00 $5,000.00 3,500.00 $3,500.00 5,000.00 $5,000.00 2,000.00 $2,000.00 Bid Tabulations for Hillcrest Water Main Improvements December 22, 2014 W 30 4 EA Connect to Existing Water Line (8" to 8") Per Location 2,000.00 $8,000.00 2,000.00 $8,000.00 1,600.00 $6,400.00 2,250.00 $9,000.00 2,000.00 $8,000.00 W 31 12 EA Cut & Plug Existing 6" Water Mains (DI Cap or Plug with Concrete Blocking)600.00 $7,200.00 950.00 $11,400.00 250.00 $3,000.00 700.00 $8,400.00 300.00 $3,600.00 W 32 3 EA Cut & Plug Existing 8" Water Mains (DI Cap or Plug with Concrete Blocking)800.00 $2,400.00 950.00 $2,850.00 750.00 $2,250.00 750.00 $2,250.00 400.00 $1,200.00 W 33 1 EA Cut & Plug Existing 12" Water Mains (DI Cap or Plug with Concrete Blocking)1,000.00 $1,000.00 1,200.00 $1,200.00 800.00 $800.00 1,200.00 $1,200.00 500.00 $500.00 W 34 1 EA Cut & Plug Existing 20" Water Mains (DI Cap or Plug with Concrete Blocking)2,000.00 $2,000.00 3,000.00 $3,000.00 4,000.00 $4,000.00 2,500.00 $2,500.00 1,000.00 $1,000.00 W 35 6 EA Fire Hydrant Assembly with 6" Valve (45'+) (Includes Anchor Tee and 6" Valve 6,500.00 $39,000.00 5,000.00 $30,000.00 9,000.00 $54,000.00 11,000.00 $66,000.00 11,000.00 $66,000.00 W 36 3 EA Fire Hydrant Assembly with 6" Valve (20'+) (Includes Anchor Tee and 6" Valve 5,000.00 $15,000.00 5,000.00 $15,000.00 9,000.00 $27,000.00 6,550.00 $19,650.00 10,000.00 $30,000.00 W 37 4 EA Remove/Dispose Existing Fire Hydrant and Valve 400.00 $1,600.00 150.00 $600.00 500.00 $2,000.00 500.00 $2,000.00 1,000.00 $4,000.00 W 38 1 EA Waterline Crossing With Existing Storm Sewer Main (2 Minimum Clearance centered 7.5' Each Way)7,000.00 $7,000.00 5,000.00 $5,000.00 15,000.00 $15,000.00 9,250.00 $9,250.00 5,000.00 $5,000.00 W 39 1 LS Trench Safety Design & Installation 6,000.00 $6,000.00 2,500.00 $2,500.00 12,000.00 $12,000.00 3,500.00 $3,500.00 50,000.00 $50,000.00 W 40 1 LS System Test (Construction sequence may require multiple partial waterline testing)3,000.00 $3,000.00 7,500.00 $7,500.00 8,000.00 $8,000.00 3,500.00 $3,500.00 20,000.00 $20,000.00 W 41 39 EA New 1" Copper Service w/ Meter Box (Work and materials to reset meter location starting 5' back of the existing meter location is to be included in this item) (Average service length is 30') 1,000.00 $39,000.00 1,100.00 $42,900.00 1,200.00 $46,800.00 2,300.00 $89,700.00 1,500.00 $58,500.00 W 42 2 EA New 2" Copper Service w/ Meter Box (Average service length is 30')2,000.00 $4,000.00 3,000.00 $6,000.00 1,900.00 $3,800.00 4,875.00 $9,750.00 2,000.00 $4,000.00 W 43 16 SY Remove Existing 4" (Behind the Curb Sidewalk) and Construct 4" Reinforced Concrete Sidewalk Class "A", 5 Sack, 3000 PSI@28 Days ( Proposed Sidewalk is a behind the curb sidewalk) 88.00 $1,408.00 90.00 $1,440.00 90.00 $1,440.00 64.00 $1,024.00 115.00 $1,840.00 Bid Tabulations for Hillcrest Water Main Improvements December 22, 2014 TOTAL BASE BID $1,081,818.00 $1,148,880.00 $1,466,575.00 $1,568,239.00 $1,770,065.00 EW 1 3 MTH Barricades, Signs, and Traffic Handling 2,000.00 $6,000.00 2,500.00 $7,500.00 7,500.00 $22,500.00 3,200.00 $9,600.00 15,000.00 $45,000.00 EW 2 3440 LF Sawed Breakout line-Full Depth 2.00 $6,880.00 1.30 $4,472.00 4.00 $13,760.00 4.00 $13,760.00 4.00 $13,760.00 EW 3 2700 SY Remove Asph. Concrete Pvmt. w/Reinf. Concrete Base (4" HMAC Average and 6" Concrete Base)5.00 $13,500.00 18.00 $48,600.00 9.00 $24,300.00 19.00 $51,300.00 20.00 $54,000.00 EW 4 2000 SY Temporary Pavement Repair (2" HMAC and Recycled Concrete Mix Backfill and Compacted Selected Backfill) (Cost includes placement, maintenance, and removal) 14.00 $28,000.00 32.00 $64,000.00 13.00 $26,000.00 13.00 $26,000.00 30.00 $60,000.00 EW 5 2700 SY Replace Asph. Concrete Pvmt. w/Reinf. Concrete Base (4" HMAC Average and 6" Concrete Base)54.00 $145,800.00 70.00 $189,000.00 80.00 $216,000.00 105.00 $283,500.00 80.00 $216,000.00 EW 6 1655 LF 24" D.I. Pipe Class 51 w/Poly Wrap w/Recycled Concrete Mix Backfill and Embedment (buried depth to top of pipe +/-84") 200.00 $331,000.00 225.00 $372,375.00 335.00 $554,425.00 280.00 $463,400.00 250.00 $413,750.00 EW 7 1 EA Connect to Existing Water Line (24" to 24") Per Location 10,000.00 $10,000.00 5,500.00 $5,500.00 4,200.00 $4,200.00 9,000.00 $9,000.00 6,000.00 $6,000.00 EW 8 1 EA Cut & Plug Existing 20" Water Mains (DI Cap or Plug with Concrete Blocking)2,000.00 $2,000.00 3,000.00 $3,000.00 7,000.00 $7,000.00 2,500.00 $2,500.00 2,000.00 $2,000.00 EW 9 1 LS Trench Safety Design & Installation 5,000.00 $5,000.00 2,000.00 $2,000.00 6,000.00 $6,000.00 2,000.00 $2,000.00 1,000.00 $1,000.00 EW 10 1 LS System Test 3,000.00 $3,000.00 3,200.00 $3,200.00 7,000.00 $7,000.00 2,000.00 $2,000.00 1,000.00 $1,000.00 EXTRA WORK $551,180.00 $699,647.00 $881,185.00 $863,060.00 $812,510.00 $1,081,818.00 $1,148,880.00 $1,466,575.00 $1,568,239.00 $1,770,065.00 $1,632,998.00 $1,848,527.00 $2,347,760.00 $2,431,299.00 $2,582,575.00 Bid Item W22 shown as $8500 not $17000.00. Bid Totals as read reflects $8,500.00 or $1,458,075.00 BID TOTALS FOR BASE BID BID TOTALS BASE BID WITH EXTRA WORK Extra Work