HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015.06.02 City Council AgendaCity Council
City of University Park
Meeting Agenda
City Hall
3800 University Blvd.
University Park, TX 75205
Council Chamber5:00 PMTuesday, June 2, 2015
PRE-MEETING WORK SESSION(S)
4:00 - 4:30 P.M. The City Council will meet in open work session to receive a briefing from Director of
Parks Gerry Bradley regarding: (1) Holmes Aquatic Center building; and (2) landscaping on Preston
Road between McFarlin and Windsor. No action will be taken. Council Conference Room, 2nd floor,
City Hall.
4:30 - 5:00 P.M. The City Council will meet in open work session to receive agenda item briefings
from staff. No action will be taken. Council Conference Room, 2nd floor, City Hall.
TO SPEAK ON AN AGENDA ITEM
Anyone wishing to address the Council on any item must fill out a green “Request to Speak” form and
return it to the City Secretary. When called forward by the Mayor, before beginning their remarks,
speakers are asked to go to the podium and state their name and address for the record.
I.CALL TO ORDER
A.INVOCATION: City Manager Robbie Corder
B.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: City Manager Robbie Corder / Boy Scouts
C.INTRODUCTION OF COUNCIL: Mayor Olin Lane, Jr.
D.INTRODUCTION OF STAFF: City Manager Robbie Corder
II.AWARDS AND RECOGNITION
III.CONSENT AGENDA
15-354 Consider approval of HPHS Highlander Band's 2nd March-a-thon
Fundraiser request.
Staff Report
Marchathon Request Ltr 2015
2015 HPHS Band Petition Signatures
HPHS 2015 March-a-thon Route
Attachments:
Page 1 City of University Park Printed on 6/2/2015
June 2, 2015City Council Meeting Agenda
15-359 Consider a proposal to relocate aquatic life from Williams Park pond.
Staff Report
Contract for Aquatic Resource Relocation 05-19-2015
A.M. RLG Amendment - Fish Relocation
Attachments:
15-360 Consider approval of the minutes of the May 19, 2015 City Council
meeting, with or without corrections.
Staff Report
City Council Meeting Minutes - May 19, 2015
Attachments:
IV.MAIN AGENDA
15-355 Consider an ordinance abandoning certain excess street right-of-way.
Staff Report
Draft Ordinance
Attachments:
15-356 Consider an ordinance designating valet parking along SMU Blvd.
Staff Report
Draft Ordinance
Attachments:
15-357 Consider an ordinance amending the Residential Parking District for the
3000 block of Rosedale.
Staff Report
Draft Ordinance
PETITION 3000 Rosedale - Residential Parking Only - 7 Days
Attachments:
15-358 Consider an ordinance designating No Parking along the perimeter of
Byrd Park.
Staff Report
Draft Ordinance
BYRD PARK NP
Attachments:
V.PUBLIC COMMENTS
Anyone wishing to address an item not on the Agenda should do so at this time. Please be advised
that under the Texas Open Meetings Act, the Council cannot discuss or act at this meeting on a
matter that is not listed on the Agenda. However, in response to an inquiry, a Council member may
respond with a statement of specific factual information or a recitation of existing policy. Other
questions or private comments for the City Council or Staff should be directed to that individual
immediately following the meeting.
VI.ADJOURNMENT
Page 2 City of University Park Printed on 6/2/2015
June 2, 2015City Council Meeting Agenda
As authorized by Section 551.071(2) of the Texas Government Code, this meeting may be convened
into Closed Executive Session for the purpose of seeking confidential legal advice from the City
Attorney on any Agenda items listed herein.
CERTIFICATE:
I, Christine Green, City Secretary, do hereby certify that a copy of this Agenda was posted on the City
Hall bulletin board, a place convenient and readily accessible to the general public at all times, and on
the City's website, www.uptexas.org, in compliance with Chapter 551, Texas Government Code.
DATE OF POSTING:____________________________
TIME OF POSTING:_____________________________
________________________________
Christine Green, City Secretary
Page 3 City of University Park Printed on 6/2/2015
3800 UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS 75205 TELEPHONE (214) 363-1644
C:\Users\GRANIC~1\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 7\@BCL@B8051AF2\@BCL@B8051AF2.docx 10:16 AM 05/22/15
AGENDA MEMO
6/2/2015Agenda
TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:Greg Spradlin, Chief of Police
SUBJECT:Consideration of HPHS Highlander Band’s 2nd March-a-thon
Fundraiser
BACKGROUND:
The Highland Park High School Highlander Band Boosters (HBB) would like to
conduct a March-a-thon Fundraiser to raise funds for their annual budget. This
event would occur on Saturday, August 15, 2015from 9:30 am to 11:00 am.
March-a-thons are a common method of fundraising for high school bands, and
several bands in the DFW area holdthem each year.
The entire HighlanderBand, Drum Line and Color Guard will travelalong the
attached parade route which includes marching through Snider Plaza. Fifty-Two
(52) of the businesses located on Snider Plaza Drive signed a petition for
Council’s review.
There would be 150 Highlander Band members participating in this March-a-
thon.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Highlander Band March-a-thonwith the following
stipulations:
The parade route included must be utilized
Two off-duty police officers will be hired to driveUniversity Park Police
vehiclesleading and trailing the band as it marches to ensure non-
participating vehicles do not cause a safety issue
The HBB will incurthe cost of the off-duty officers
2015March-a-thonRoute
3800 UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS 75205 TELEPHONE (214) 363-1644
C:\Users\GRANIC~1\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 7\@BCL@F0052E19\@BCL@F0052E19.docx 8:22 AM 05/28/15
AGENDA MEMO
6/2/2015Agenda
TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:Gene R. Smallwood, P.E.; Director of Public Works
SUBJECT:IES CONTRACT –ACQUATIC LIFE RELOCATION
BACKGROUND:
At their February 17th meeting, the City Council approved an engineering contract with
Integrated Environmental Solutions to develop a State-required fish relocation plan in
connection with the McFarlin Bridge and silt removal project. IES completed that task,
and the plan wasapproved by the Texas Department of Parks and Wildlife. The
attached contract, in the amount of $9,500 provides services associated with physically
relocating aquatic life from the Williams Park pond to the Curtis Park pond. This work
will follow the guidelines identified in the approved plan.
Funds for the work are available in the Capital Projects fund.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends City Council approval of the contract with Integrated Environmental
Solutions, in the amount of $9,500, and authorization for the City Manager to enter into a
contract.
CONTRACT FOR SERVICES (Firm Fixed Price) CONTRACTOR: CLIENT:
Integrated Environmental Solutions, LLC. City of University Park
610 Elm Street Ste 300 3800 University Boulevard
McKinney, Texas 75069 University Park, Texas 75205
Contact: Mr. Rudi Reinecke Contact: Mr. Gene “Bud” Smallwood, P.E.
Telephone: (972) 562-7672 Telephone: (214) 987-5400
Facsimile: (972) 562-7673 Facsimile:
IES Contract No.: Client Project Number:
IES Contract Date: Client Contract Number:
Services:
Services are identified in Attachment A, Scope of Services dated 19 May 2015 (hereinafter referred to as the “Services”). The
worksite is the property associated with Williams Pond located in the City of University Park, Dallas County, Texas. Williams
pond is identified as an impoundment of Turtle Creek, located between University and McFarlin boulevards. (hereinafter referred
to as the “Site”).
Price:
Compensation for Environmental Services will be based on firm fixed fee based on the following cost estimates.
Collection and Relocation activities as described by the TPWD Aquatic Resource Relocation Plan dated 5 May 2015 - $9,500.00
Information Furnished by CLIENT:
Information to be furnished by CLIENT is identified in Attachment A, Scope of Services dated 19 May 2015.
Special Conditions:
If supplementary collection and relocation methods are recommended by TPWD, additional fees may be required. Upon acceptance by IES’s execution below, this Order constitutes a contract to perform the services described above in accordance with the terms and conditions identified in Attachment B; subject only to such Special Conditions as are expressly set forth in this Order.
CLIENT CONTRACTOR
City of University Park Integrated Environmental Solutions, LLC
By: By: ____________________________________________ (signature) (signature)
Name: Name: Rae Lynn Schneider
Title: Title: President
Date: Date: 19 May 2015
19 May 2015 Gene “Bud” Smallwood, P.E. City of University Park 3800 University Boulevard University Park, Texas 75205 Re: Proposal for environmental services to conduct fish and mussel collection and relocation activities at Williams Pond, University Park, Texas as described in the TPWD-approved Aquatic Resource Relocation Plan submitted 5 May 2015. Mr. Smallwood; Integrated Environmental Solutions, LLC. (IES) is pleased to submit this proposal for environmental services to conduct fish and mussel collection and relocation activities at Williams Pond, University Park, Texas as described in the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) Aquatic Resource Relocation Plan. These collection and relocation activities are associated with the proposed dredging and excavation project, which is in conjunction with the expansion of McFarlin Boulevard. A brief description of the permitting and aquatic resource relocation processes is provided below. Under the Texas Parks and Wildlife Code 66.015 of the Texas Administrative Code, to take and/or relocate any aquatic organisms within the State, a permit to introduce/relocate these aquatic organisms into another water body needs to be obtained. Projects, which have impacts to waters of the United States, including rivers, perennial streams, and reservoirs within these river basins, may require an introduction permit for fishes and freshwater mussels from TPWD. Because Turtle Creek is a perennial stream and public water, TPWD would assert jurisdiction over any construction or maintenance activities taking place within the waterbody. To obtain an introduction permit from TPWD, they require that an aquatic resource relocation plan be completed and approved by the TPWD Kills and Spills Team, to ensure that Best Management Practices (BMPs) are used. Depending on their locations, these projects may also require a freshwater mussel presence/absence survey to ensure the project will not impact any state-listed freshwater mussel species. Each of these activities must be conducted by an individual possessing a Scientific Permit for Research from TPWD, which is required to collect, salvage, band or hold all native Texas wildlife for scientific purposes. Following the approval of a TPWD Aquatic Resource Relocation Plan, an introduction permit will be obtained from TPWD, which will allow the take and relocation of all aquatic resources located within Williams Pond. Once an introduction permit is obtained, collection and relocation activities will be conducted during the Williams Pond dewatering process. During the dewatering process of Williams Pond, IES will survey, collect, and relocate all necessary aquatic organisms to satisfy TPWD rules and regulations. Below describes the processes in which mussels and fishes will be collected and relocated as described in the Aquatic Resource Relocation Plan:
City of University Park Page 2
Williams Pond – Aquatic Resource Relocation
19 May 2015
Mussels A TPWD-permitted malacologist and other trained biologists will examine the substrate visually and/or tactilely during the dewatering process. Recovered mussels will be placed in mesh bags or buckets and brought to the shore. A TPWD-permitted malacologist will then identify the species and sort shells and valves from live individuals. All live mussels will be transported in coolers maintained at pond temperature to the selected relocation site (Pond in Curtis Park). Live mussels will be kept for as short of a period of time as possible, with the goal of no more than four hours, and definitely no more than 12 hours.
Fishes Seine, cast, and dip nets will be utilized, to recover fish during the dewatering process. Three biologists will conduct the seining efforts from on-shore and aboard 16 foot Jon boat, which can be hand-placed into the pond. A coffer dam will be placed within Turtle Creek upstream of the proposed project by the contractor hired to conduct the dewatering activities in order to prevent water flow and fish from moving into the project site during the dewatering process. Live fish will be collected and temporarily stored in an aerated storage tank. Fish will then be transported to the designated relocation site in an aerated storage tank. Assumptions made for the collection and relocation activities:
• Another individual/organization is contracted to conduct the dewatering activities and will be available during the fish relocation activities if needed.
• The contractor responsible for the dewatering activities will install and maintain the coffer dam on the upstream side of Williams Pond.
• The relocation site designated by the city (Pond in Curtis Park) is still subject to use. IES proposes the above services for the following costs: Collection and Relocation activities as described by the TPWD Aquatic Resource Relocation Plan submitted 5 May 2015 $9,500.00 IES appreciates the opportunity to continue to work with you and the City of University Park. If you have any comments, questions, or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at 972/562-7672 (rreinecke@intenvsol.com).
Sincerely, Integrated Environmental Solutions, LLC.
Rudi Reinecke Vice President
Attachment B: Terms & Conditions
Integrated Environmental Solutions, LLC (hereinafter “IES”) shall perform the Services (or the Work) as
set forth in the attached Contract for Services (“Contract”) which these Terms and Conditions will apply.
The term "Site" shall mean the property referred to in the Contract.
1. Amendments. CLIENT may order changes by altering, adding to and/or deducting from the Services
to be performed and any such changes, once agreed to in writing by both parties will become part of this
Contract.
2. Project Costs. This agreement constitutes a Contract in accordance with the Cost Schedule identified
in the Contract. IES shall submit invoices monthly for Services delivered to CLIENT during that period.
Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of the invoice date. Interest on unpaid invoices of IES shall
accrue and be paid at a rate of prime + 1.5% per thirty (30) days, or the maximum amount allowable by
law. Additionally, CLIENT agrees to pay any and all associated attorney’s fees and costs with the
collection of any debt owed by CLIENT to IES that remains unpaid over 30 days from the date of the
invoice).
3. Confidentiality. IES shall take reasonable steps to protect all information and data developed in
performance of this Contract, or supplied to or obtained by IES from CLIENT, or generated by IES or its
subcontractors, agents, and employees.
4. Relationship of the Parties. It is understood that all services rendered to CLIENT under this
Agreement shall be monitored by CLIENT; however, IES' daily activity, schedules, health and safety
precautions, methods and means of performing the actual Services shall be the responsibility of IES. IES,
its employees or subcontractors shall act solely as an independent contractor in performing the Services
and nothing herein shall be construed to create the relationship of employer and employee, principal and
agent, partners or joint ventures between or among CLIENT and IES or its employees or subcontractors.
Except as specifically provided in this Agreement, IES shall have no right or authority to act for CLIENT
and will not enter into any contract or other agreement, or incur any debt, liability or obligation of any
nature in the name of or on behalf of CLIENT.
5. Contact with Government Agencies. In performing the Services, IES shall cooperate with all federal,
state and local governmental agencies having authority over the subject matter hereof and the
performance of the Services; provided, however, neither IES nor its employees nor subcontractors shall
contact any governmental authority for any purpose related to the Services without the prior consent of
CLIENT except as required for performance of the Services.
6. Representations, Warranties and Covenants.
6.A. Permits & Licenses. In the performance of the Services, IES shall meet all the necessary
qualifications for and hold any and all applicable licenses or certifications required by federal, state or local
rules and regulations to perform the work. Unless otherwise specified in this Contract, the CLIENT shall
be responsible for obtaining all site-specific permits required by federal, state, or local rules and
regulations.
6.B. Site Conditions. CLIENT will inform IES about location of utilities and secure access to Sites and
CLIENT will be liable for any damage to utilities or the property of others not properly identified to IES.
CLIENT will inform IES of all known or suspected hazardous conditions on the Site, either currently
existing or as soon as CLIENT becomes aware of potential risks.
6.C. Due Authorization; Good Standing. IES and CLIENT have the power and authority to enter into this
Contract and upon execution, this Contract will constitute the binding and valid obligations of IES and
CLIENT enforceable in accordance with its terms.
6.D. Payment of Claims. IES shall assume, pay and discharge any and all liabilities, claims or demands of
suppliers, subcontractors or vendors arising out of the Services. IES shall maintain the Site free and clear
of any and all liens, claims or encumbrances of any type or description pertaining to the work performed
by IES.
6.E. Equal Opportunity. During the Services, IES shall, in good faith, afford equal opportunity as set forth
under and required by federal, state or local rules and regulations to all employees and applicants for
employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, handicapped conditions, or national origin. IES
Page 1 of 2 Commercial contract T&C
Attachment B: Terms & Conditions
further agrees to afford equal opportunity as set forth and required by federal, state or local rules and
regulations to any lower-tier subcontractors and vendors which are "disadvantaged business enterprises"
or "women-owned enterprises," as defined by federal regulations in effect on the date of this Contract.
7. Delays and Termination. IES will complete the Services in accordance with the schedule set forth in
the Contract. In the event Services cannot be performed on or before the projected due date because of
circumstances beyond the control of IES, including but not limited to, strike, fire, riot, act of God,
governmental action, or action or omission by CLIENT, the schedule shall be amended by IES and
CLIENT in accordance with paragraph 1 of this Contract. CLIENT or IES may terminate this Contract
upon delivery of prior written notice should the other party fail substantially to perform in accordance with
the terms and conditions of this Contract through no fault of the terminating party. In the event of
termination by IES, CLIENT shall compensate IES for the Services performed up to the date of receipt of
termination, plus reasonable costs incurred in terminating the Services.
8. Compliance with Laws. The Services shall be performed in full compliance with all applicable federal,
state and local laws, rules and regulations.
9. Indemnity. IES shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless CLIENT from and against any and all
lawsuits, claims, liabilities, actions, causes of action, demands, losses, damages, forfeitures, penalties,
fines, costs and expenses, including, but not limited to, attorneys' fees and expenses, arising from (i) a
material breach by IES of any term or provision of this Contract. CLIENT shall indemnify, defend, and
hold harmless IES from and against any and all lawsuits, claims, liabilities, actions, causes of action,
demands, losses, damages, forfeitures, penalties, fines, costs and expenses, including, but not limited to,
attorneys' fees and expenses, arising from (i) a material breach by CLIENT of any term or provision of this
Contract; or (ii) any error, omission, negligence or misconduct of CLIENT or its employees, agents or
other subcontractors.
10. Insurance. In addition to any other insurance which IES may be required or choose to carry, IES
shall, at its sole expense, maintain in effect at all times during the performance of the Services under this
Contract insurance coverages and corresponding amounts in accordance with the attached insurance
certificate. Such policies shall be with insurers licensed to do business in the State of the project. IES
shall pay any and all deductibles or retentions under all insurance carried by IES.
11. Assignments/Subcontracts. Neither this Contract nor any interest, claim or obligation hereunder
shall be assigned or transferred by IES or CLIENT to any party or parties without the prior written consent
of the other party, except that IES may subcontract portions of the Services to other persons or
corporations.
12. Invalidity; No Implied Waiver. In the event that any one or more of the provisions contained in this
Contract shall for any reason be held invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity,
illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision of this Contract. No failure to exercise, and
no delay in exercising, any right, power or remedy under this Contract shall impair any right, power or
remedy which any party hereto may have, nor shall any such failure or delay be construed to be a waiver
of any such right, power or remedy or an acquiescence in any breach or default under this Contract absent
an express, written waiver or acquiescence, nor shall any waiver of any breach or default be deemed a
waiver of any default or breach subsequently occurring under this Contract.
13. Applicable Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue. This Contract shall be governed by and construed
according to the laws of the State of Texas. IES and CLIENT agree to jurisdiction in the State of Texas
and venue in Collin County, Texas.
14. Notices; Communications. All notices or communications required or permitted to be given or made
hereunder by any party hereto shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given if
personally delivered or transmitted by first class, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, expedited
delivery service, or telegram.
15. Entire Agreement. This Contract and the attachments hereto constitute the sole and entire
agreement between the parties. This Contract replaces and supersedes all prior discussions and
agreements between and among CLIENT and IES with respect to the matters contained herein.
Page 2 of 2 Commercial contract T&C
3800 UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS 75205 TELEPHONE (214) 363-1644
C:\Users\GRANIC~1\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 7\@BCL@F0056220\@BCL@F0056220.docx 8:22 AM 05/28/15
AGENDA MEMO
2/17/2014Agenda
TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:Gene R. Smallwood, P.E.; Director of PublicWorks
SUBJECT:Engineering Contract Amendment
BACKGROUND:
An engineering contract with R.L. Goodson for design of the proposed McFarlin Bridge
was approved at the 08.19.14 City Council meeting. In addition to design, the
agreement included application to the US Corps of Engineers, prepared by their sub-
consultant, for the requisite permit for construction of the bridge and removal of silt in the
channel. In preparation for the application, the sub-consultant was informed by the
USCOE representative that one of the State and Federal reviewing agencies, the Texas
Department of Parks and WildlifeDepartment recently initiated enforcement of a 1980
statute that will require the City to develop a fish relocation plan and apply for a permit to
transfer fish from the Williams Park pond during the dewatering operations prior to silt
removal.
The $2,250 fee for additional work necessary for the consultant to prepare the plan and
permit application is identified in the attached amendment to the engineering contract.
Upon receipt of the permit and draining of the pond, the scope of work and cost for
capturing andrelocatingthe fishwill be determined.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends City Council approval of the amendment to theR.L. Goodson contract
in the amount of $2,250.
3800 UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS 75205 TELEPHONE (214) 363-1644
C:\Users\GRANIC~1\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 7\@BCL@E8058E3D\@BCL@E8058E3D.docx 2:33 PM 05/28/15
AGENDA MEMO
6/2/2015Agenda
TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:Christine Green, City Secretary
SUBJECT:Minutes of the May 19, 2015 City Council Meeting
Minutes of the May 19, 2015City Council Meeting are included for the Council’s review.
City Hall
3800 University Blvd.
University Park, TX 75205
City of University Park
Meeting Minutes
City Council
5:00 PM Council ChamberTuesday, May 19, 2015
EXECUTIVE SESSION
3:00 - 4:00 P.M. Pursuant to TGC§ 551.071, the City Council met in closed session to
receive confidential legal advice from the City Attorney with regard to: (1) pending litigation
(James H. Watson vs. the City of Allen, et al); (2) a consulting contract to perform a study at
3805 McFarlin; and (3) park usage. No action was taken. Executive Conference Room, 1st
Floor, City Hall.
PRE-MEETING WORK SESSION(S)
4:00 - 4:45 P.M. The City Council met in open work session to receive an overview of the
2015 Community Survey Findings from Michael Egan of the The Dallas Marketing Group.
4:45 - 5:00 P.M. The City Council met in open work session to receive agenda item briefings
from staff. No action was taken. Council Conference Room, 2nd floor, City Hall.
CALL TO ORDERI.
Rollcall
Councilmember Bob Begert, Councilmember Tommy Stewart,
Councilmember Taylor Armstrong and Mayor Olin Lane
Present:4 -
Councilmember Dawn MooreExcused:1 -
INVOCATION: City Attorney Rob DillardA.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: City Attorney Rob Dillard / Boy ScoutsB.
Boy Scout Gage Holmes of Troop 518 was present as part of earning his
Citizenship in the Community merit badge. He assisted City Attorney Rob
Dillard and the City Council in leading the Pledge of Allegiance.
INTRODUCTION OF COUNCIL: Mayor Olin Lane, Jr.C.
Page 1City of University Park
May 19, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes
INTRODUCTION OF STAFF: City Manager Robbie CorderD.
Staff in attendance included Community Information Officer Steve Mace,
Director of Information Services Dale Harwell, Chief of Police Greg Spradlin,
Director of Public Works Bud Smallwood, City Secretary Christine Green,
Director of Parks and Recreation Gerry Bradley, Library Director Sharon
Martin, Fire Chief Randy Howell, Director of Finance Tom Tvardzik,
Community Development Director Pat Baugh, and Deputy Director of Public
Works Jacob Speer.
AWARDS AND RECOGNITIONII.
None
CONSENT AGENDAIII.
15-351 Consider approval of the minutes of the May 5, 2015 City Council
meeting with or without corrections.
The minutes were approved.
Approval of the Consent Agenda
A motion was made by Councilmember Taylor Armstrong, seconded by
Councilmember Bob Begert, to approve the Consent Agenda. The motion
carried by the following vote:
Aye:Councilmember Begert, Councilmember Stewart, Councilmember
Armstrong, and Mayor Lane
4 -
MAIN AGENDAIV.
Page 2City of University Park
May 19, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes
15-349 Consider an ordinance approving a negotiated settlement agreement
with Atmos Energy Corporation
Director of Information Services Dale Harwell said that the City is a member
of the Atmos Cities Steering Committee (ACSC). The RRM Tariff was
adopted by the City as an alternative to the Gas Reliability Infrastructure
Program (GRIP), the statutory provision that allows Atmos to bypass the
City’s rate regulatory authority to increase its rates annually to recover
capital investments. In February 2014, Atmos filed its second annual filing
under the Rate Review Mechanism (RRM) Tariff, seeking an increase of
$45.7 million. On the recommendation of the ACSC, the City denied the
requested rate increase via a resolution in 2014.
ACSC and Atmos reached a settlement on the rate increase request this
year. This ordinance will approve the settlement agreement and the
resulting rate change under the RRM Tariff. As a result of the negotiations,
the ACSC reduced Atmos' requested $28.8 million rate increase to
$21,962,784. When added to the settlement of the 2014 RRM filing and
adjustments recommended by the Texas Railroad Commission, Atmos will
receive total additional annual revenues of $65.7 million. Because the 2014
rates have been in effect since June 1, 2014, the increase to currently-billed
rates is $21 million. Approval of this ordinance will result in rates that
implement an increase in Atmos' revenues effective June 1, 2015.
The monthly residential customer charge will be $18.60. The consumption
charge will change from $0.08819 per Ccf to $0.09931 per Ccf. The monthly
bill impact for the typical residential customer consuming 60 Ccf will be an
increase of $1.14 (about a 1.59% increase in the base bill). The typical
commercial customer will see an increase of $2.69 or 0.96%.
A motion was made by Councilmember Bob Begert, seconded by
Councilmember Tommy Stewart, to adopt this ordinance. The motion carried
by the following vote:
Aye:Councilmember Begert, Councilmember Stewart, Councilmember
Armstrong, and Mayor Lane
4 -
Excused:Councilmember Moore1 -
Enactment No: ORD No. 15/011
Page 3City of University Park
May 19, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes
15-352 Overview of 2015 Community Survey findings
Michael Egan of The Dallas Marketing Group (DMG) provided an overview of
the 2015 Community Survey results. He said that the overall goals of the
survey were twofold - one was to measure attitudes, awareness, and usage
of the residents of University Park and compare those with the survey results
measured over the last decade, and the other was to listen carefully to the
opinions and attitudes of residents in their own voice.
Mr. Egan spoke about the methodology used in the survey. He said the
survey was scientifically designed. Surveys were sent to every household in
the city via the utility bill. There was an option to complete the survey online
using a secure password stamped on the front of the printed questionnaire.
He said that 16% of all households responded. This is a statistically
meaningful response, and the results have a margin of error of plus or minus
2.7 percentage points. The survey was carefully designed to be objective
and not to project any kind of bias in its paper or online form.
The survey used the Likert scale, a five point measurement of satisfaction.
DMG summarized the percentage of people who said they were either
satisfied or very satisfied, and called that the "satisfaction score." He
compared the scale to a school grading system, where a satisfaction score
of 90% and above would be considered an "A", 80 -89 a "B", 70-79 a "C", 60
- 69 a "D" and anything below that an "F".
Mr. Egan said that the City scored an "A" on almost all of the important
issues. These include Overall Satisfaction, Willingness to Recommend, Met
Expectation, and Value. Responses were tracked by region within the City,
and he said that there was a fairly uniform distribution of responses from
each region. Significant decreases in satisfaction since the last survey
include rental of city facilities and the reservations systems used for the
tennis courts, athletic fields and park rentals.
There were dissatisfaction scores above 10 points in the areas of code
enforcement and fairness of code enforcement. The home construction
question showed significant dissatisfaction with building site
cleanliness/appearance and home size regulation. He said the survey
showed that residents want the City to address the issue of fairness in code
enforcement.
There were high levels of satisfaction for trash and recycling as well as
water, sewer, and streets.
Public Safety received very high satisfaction levels in all areas. The Fire
Department had the highest satisfaction rating of 95%. The Police
Department also ranked high in emergency response and keeping the
community safe, but there is an opportunity for improvement in the area of
enforcing traffic regulations and the fairness of traffic enforcement.
This is the first time the Library has been included in the survey. Three
quarters of the residents were aware of at least one of the services offered
Page 4City of University Park
May 19, 2015City Council Meeting Minutes
by the Library. Lectures and adult book reviews were the most likely to be
used by residents while Spanish language programs for children's lessons
and story times were the least likely to be used.
Looking at the community's satisfaction in terms of the City's customer
service, there were very high scores overall, consistent with previous results.
The only two areas with significant changes from the past and negative
scores were "helpfulness and courtesy of code enforcement staff" and"
fairness about how zoning issues are handled".
The City's website scored well. In the written comments about the website,
respondents said that they would like the website to be more convenient in
terms of paying utility bills and making reservations for park facilities. The
Arbor newsletter came out at the top of the list for preferred communication
methods.
There was a question on the survey asking residents the likelihood that they
would use an indoor pool (natatorium) if it were built as a joint-use
partnership with the Highland Park ISD. There was a 10 point majority that
said they would be unlikely to use such a pool.
Mr. Egan said there were two big strategic issues identified by the survey.
The first is fairness of code enforcement and enforcement of traffic
regulations, and the second is new home size and deep concerns about
regulations for new home size and the impact on the quality of life in
University Park. For the Police Department, he said the most common
suggestion was to build a stronger rapport with the residents. The
opportunities for the website include improved functionality and ease of use
to make it more convenient to find information.
Mr. Egan said that one interesting result of this survey is that there is a
rapidly growing cohort of 30-44 year old residents. He said they would be
the City's advocates for the policies that work now and that the City should
use this group to spread the message throughout the community.
He ended with a compliment to the City administration as customer service is
a "very satisfied" attribute among residents of the City of University Park.
PUBLIC COMMENTSV.
There were no speakers.
ADJOURNMENTVI.
Page 5City of University Park
3800 UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS 75205 TELEPHONE (214) 363-1644
C:\Users\GRANIC~1\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 7\@BCL@D805E052\@BCL@D805E052.docx 8:07 AM 05/28/15
AGENDA MEMO
6/2/2015Agenda
TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:Gene R. Smallwood, P.E.; Director of Public Works
SUBJECT:ABANDON R-O-W AT 3701 STANFORD
BACKGROUND:
Staff received a request to abandon a small piece of right-of-way along the Turtle Creek
Blvd frontage of the property at 3701 Stanford. The property owner would like to
construct a gate for his fence. Because of the curved right-of-way, there is not sufficient
room. To accommodate the gate, he needs a very small “corner-clip”of 55.5 square feet
(see attached survey). Because the proposed abandonment is so small, the property
owner requested that he not have to pay for an appraisal. In discussion with staff he
agreed to pay the fair market value FMV of the latest appraisal we’ve had performed –
the Lovers 52 project. The FMV for that site was $102 / SF. Using that value for this
request would translate to $5,661. Staff asked the City Attorney to develop an ordinance
abandoning 55.5 SF of Turtle Creek Blvd right-of-way to the property owner at 3701
Stanford.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends City Council approval of the ordinance abandoning 55.5 SF of Turtle
Creek Blvd right-of-way to the property owner at 3701 Stanford.
ORDINANCE NO. _________________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK TEXAS,
ABANDONING A PORTION OF THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY OF TURTLE CREEK BOULEVARD,AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A HERETO,TO THE ABUTTING OWNERS, THOMAS SHARPE AND CATHERINE SHARPE;PROVIDING FOR THE FURNISHING OF A CERTIFIED COPY OF THIS ORDINANCE
FOR RECORDING IN THE REAL PROPERTY RECORDS OF UNIVERSITY PARK
COUNTY, TEXAS, AS A QUITCLAIM DEED OF THE CITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of University Park, Texas, has determined that a
certain street right-of-way,as described herein, isnot needed or necessary for public purposes by
the City and any claim to it should be abandoned to the abutting owners, subject to the provisions of this ordinance;Now, Therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY
PARK, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.The City of University Park hereby abandons and quitclaims, in favor of the
abutting owners, Thomas Sharpe and Catherine Sharpe(“Owners”),of 3701 Stanford, a 55.5square
feet portion of the street right-of-way of Turtle Creek Boulevardthat is no longer needed or
necessary for public purposes by the City, said right-of-waybeing more particularly describedin
Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes, the same as if fully copied
herein,in the City of University Park, DallasCounty, Texas(the “abandoned area”).
SECTION 2.That the City of University Park does not abandon any other interest other
than described in Exhibit “A”, but does hereby abandon all of its right, title, or interest in the
described real property, together with any and all improvements thereon, if any, subject however, to
the provisions of this ordinance.
SECTION 3. Thatupon paymentto the City by Ownersof $5,661.00, the fair market
value of the interest describedand depictedin Exhibit “A” as determined by an appraisal obtained
by the City for this purpose, the City Secretary is directed to prepare a certified copy ofthis
ordinance and furnish the same to Ownersfor recordingin the Real Property Records of Dallas
County. The recording of this abandonment ordinance in the Real Property Records of Dallas
County, Texas, shall serve as a quitclaim deed of the City of University Park of all such right, title
or interest of the City of University Park in and to the abandoned area, plus all improvements
thereon, if any.
SECTION 4.This ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage, as
the law and Charter in such cases provide.
DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of University Park, Texas, on the 2ndday
of June2015.
APPROVED:
________________________________
OLIN B. LANE, MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM:ATTEST:
_________________________________________________________________CITY ATTORNEY CHRISTINE GREEN, CITY SECRETARY(RLD/05/27/15; 71784)
EXHIBIT “A”
3800 UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS 75205 TELEPHONE (214) 363-1644
C:\Users\GRANIC~1\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 7\@BCL@4C055A56\@BCL@4C055A56.docx 3:58 PM 05/28/15
AGENDA MEMO
6/2/2015Agenda
TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:Gene R. Smallwood, P.E.; Director of Public Works
SUBJECT:VALET PARKING ONLY -GWBPC
BACKGROUND:
The George Bush Presidential Center (GWBPC) recently funded construction of a
recessedparkingareaalong the north side of SMU Blvd west of the crosswalk to the
GBPC. The parking recess was constructed with the express intent to be used for valet
service. Since construction, however, the space is frequently used by drivers other than
valet. The Police Department cannot cite anyone, because there is not a parking
designation for the recess. To that end, staff asked the City Attorney to draft the
attached ordinance to identify the recess for valet parking only. The ordinance calls for
the Police Department toissue a special permit for the valet service. Vehicles without a
permit are in violation of the ordinance.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends City Council approval of an ordinance designating VALET PARKING
ONLY for the recessed area along the north side of SMU Blvd, west of the crosswalk to
the GWBPC.
ORDINANCE NO. ___________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS,
AUTHORIZING PERMITPARKING ONLY ON THE NORTHSIDE OF SMU BOULEVARD IN THE INSET PARKING AREA BETWEEN DURHAM STREET/BUSH AVENUE AND BOEDEKER STREET; PROVIDING FOR THE ERECTION OF SIGNSINDICATING PERMIT PARKINGONLY; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL
ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING
FOR A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS ($200.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY
PARK, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.It shall be unlawful and an offense for any person to leave, stand or park any
motor vehicle at any time in the inset parking area on thenorth side of SMU Boulevard between
Durham Street/Bush Avenue and Boedeker Street without a special permit issued by the Chief of
Police or his designee.
SECTION 2.All ordinances of the City of University Park in conflict with the provisions
of this ordinance are hereby repealed.
SECTION 3.That should any sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section
of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal, or invalid, the same shall not
affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole, or any part or provision thereof, other than the part
decided to be invalid, illegal or unconstitutional.
SECTION 4.That any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be
deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction in the municipal court of the City of
University Park, Texas, shall be subject to a fine not to exceed the sum of two hundred dollars
($200.00) for each offense.
SECTION 5.That this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage
and the publication of the caption,as the law and Charter in such cases provide. The parking
restrictions set out herein shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice thereof shall
have been erected as provided by the Code of Ordinancesindicating “PERMITPARKINGONLY”.
DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of University Park, Texas, on the____day
of ________2015.
APPROVED:
____________________________________
OLIN B. LANE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________________
CHRISTINE GREEN, CITY SECRETARYAPPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
CITY ATTORNEY
(RLD/05-21-15/TM71710)
ORDINANCE NO. ___________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS,
AUTHORIZING PERMIT PARKING ONLY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SMU
BOULEVARD IN THE INSET PARKING AREA BETWEEN DURHAM STREET/BUSH AVENUE AND BOEDEKER STREET; PROVIDING FOR THE ERECTION OF SIGNS INDICATING PERMIT PARKING ONLY; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING
FOR A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO HUNDRED
DOLLARS ($200.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
DULY PASSED by the City Council of theCity ofUniversity Park, Texas, on the ____day
of ______2015.
APPROVED:
____________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
3800 UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS 75205 TELEPHONE (214) 363-1644
P:\Agenda Packets\977_City Council_6_2_2015\0006_1_Staff Report.docx 11:22 AM 06/0
AGENDA MEMO
6/2/2015 Agenda
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Gene R. Smallwood, P.E.; Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Amendment to the Residential Parking District
BACKGROUND:
Staff received a request to amend the existing residential parking district (RPD) along
the 3000 block of Rosedale. The existing ordinance designates "residential parking only"
along both north and south curbs from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday. The
residents are requesting a change to seven days per week. A survey of the block was
conducted, with eighty-one (81%) percent of the residents in favor of the change. To
that end, the City Attorney developed an ordinance amending the existing RPD.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends City Council approval of the ordinance amending existing RPD along
the 3000 block of Rosedale to designate "RESIDENTIAL PARKING ONLY" along both
north and south curb lines, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., seven (7) days per week.
ORDINANCE NO. _________________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS, AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, CHAPTER12, TRAFFIC CONTROL, BY AMENDING SECTION 12.05.042
(a)(21) TO PROVIDE RESIDENT-PARKING-ONLY FOR THE 3000-3300 BLOCKS
OF ROSEDALE, PROVIDED THAT THE RESIDENT-PARKING-ONLY
RESTRICTION FOR THE 3000BLOCKSHALL BE EFFECTIVE DAILY FROM
8:00 A. M. TO 5:00 P. M.; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL
ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO
HUNDRED DOLLARS ($200.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATEAND FOR THE ERECTION OF SIGNS.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.That Chapter 12,Article 12.05 “Parking”, Section 12.05.042(a),of
the Code of Ordinances, City of University Park, Texas, ishereby amendedin partas
follows:
"Sec. 12.05.042Zones Designated; issuance of permits
(a)The following are designated as resident-parking-only zones, to wit:
…
(21) The 3000-3300 blocks of Rosedale, provided that the resident-parking-only
restriction for the 3000 block of Rosedale shall be effective from 8:00 a. m. to 5:00
p. m. daily;
…”
SECTION 2. That all provisions of the Code of Ordinances of the City of
University Park, Texas, in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed.
SECTION 3. Thatshould any word, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause,
phrase or section of this ordinance or of the Code of Ordinances, as amended hereby, be
adjudged or held to be void or unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions of said ordinance or the Code of Ordinances, as amended hereby, which
shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 4.Any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions of this
ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction in the municipal
court of the City of University Park, Texas, shall be punished by a fine not to exceed the sum
of twohundred dollars ($200.00) for each offense.
SECTION 5.That this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after the
publication of the caption, as the law and Charter in such cases provide, subject to the
erection of appropriate signs giving notice of the resident-parking-onlyzones and hours
provided for herein.
DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of University Park, Texas, on the
____day of _________________2015.
APPROVED:
______________________________
OLIN B. LANE, MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
________________________ _________________________________CITY ATTORNEY CHRISTINE GREEN,CITY SECRETARY
(RLD/05-21-15/71712)
ORDINANCE NO. _________________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS, AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY
PARK, CHAPTER 12, TRAFFIC CONTROL, BY AMENDING SECTION 12.05.042
(a) (21) TO PROVIDE RESIDENT-PARKING-ONLY FOR THE 3000-3300 BLOCKS
OF ROSEDALE, PROVIDED THAT THE RESIDENT-PARKING-ONLY
RESTRICTION FOR THE 3000 BLOCK SHALL BE EFFECTIVE DAILY FROM
8:00 A. M. TO 5:00 P. M.; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL
ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO
HUNDRED DOLLARS ($200.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR THE ERECTION OF SIGNS.
DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of University Park, Texas, on the
____day of _______________2015.
APPROVED:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________________CITY SECRETARY
PETITIONTO AMEND THE
RESIDENTIAL PARKINGDISTRICT
3000 block of Rosedale
The City of University Park is in receipt of a request to extendRESIDENTIAL PARKING ONLYfor the
north and southcurb linesof the3000 block of Rosedale, fromDublin to Durham, from Monday
through Friday to 7 days per week. Prior to any consideration of this matter before the City Council,
we are polling those residents impacted by the suggested change. Please provide your opinion in the
space providedbelow:
_____I am in favor of therequest to extend theRESIDENTIAL PARKING ONLYalongthe
3000block of RosedalefromDublin to Durhamfrom Monday through Friday to 7 days
per week;
_____I am opposed to the request toextend theRESIDENTIAL PARKING ONLYalongthe
3000 block of Rosedale from Dublinto Durhamfrom Monday through Friday to 7 days
per week;
If a majority of the surveys are favorable, City staff will develop an enabling ordinance for City Council
considerationat an upcomingCity Council meeting.
NAME:_________________________________________________________
ADDRESS:_________________________________________________________
PHONE:_______________E-Mail:__________________________
Pleasereturnsurveysto City Hall (c/o DPW Bud Smallwood), 3800 University Blvd, University Park,
TX 75205 or e-mailto bsmallwood@uptexas.org. Surveys can also be faxed to 214.987.5499.
3800 UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS 75205 TELEPHONE (214) 363-1644
C:\Users\GRANIC~1\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 7\@BCL@6C05FA33\@BCL@6C05FA33.docx 5:03 PM 05/28/15
AGENDA MEMO
6/2/2015Agenda
TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:Gene R. Smallwood, P.E.; Director of Public Works
SUBJECT:NO PARKING–BYRD PARK
BACKGROUND:
Parking during activities at Goar Parkcreatesan unsafe traffic issue with vehicles
parked along both sides of the street near the Vassar-Turtle Creek intersection. The
issue is the total lack of sight distance cause by the parked vehicles around Byrd Park.
Vehicles trying to enter TC Blvd from Vassar cannot see oncoming traffic. Staff has
received numerous complaints.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends City Council approval of an ordinance designating NO PARKING
ANYTIMEalong the perimeter of Byrd Park.
ORDINANCE NO. ___________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS,
PROHIBITING PARKING ON THE PORTIONS OF VASSAR DRIVE AND TURTLE CREEK BOULEVARD ABUTTING BYRD PARK; PROVIDING FOR THE ERECTION
OF SIGNSINDICATING NO PARKINGAT ANY TIME; PROVIDING FOR THE
REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF
TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS ($200.00) FOREACH OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY
PARK, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.It shall be unlawful and an offense for any person to leave, stand or park any
motor vehicle at any time on theportions of Vassar Driveand Turtle Creek Boulevard abutting
Byrd Park.
SECTION 2.All ordinances of the City of University Park in conflict with the provisions
of this ordinance are hereby repealed.
SECTION 3.That should any sentence, paragraph, subdivision,clause, phrase or section
of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal, or invalid, the same shall not
affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole, or any part or provision thereof, other than the part
decided to be invalid, illegal or unconstitutional.
SECTION 4.That any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be
deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction in the municipal court of the City of
University Park, Texas, shall be subject to a finenot to exceed the sum of two hundred dollars
($200.00) for each offense.
SECTION 5.That this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage
and the publication of the caption,as the law and Charter in such cases provide. The parking
restrictions set out herein shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice thereof shall
have been erected as provided by the Code of Ordinancesindicating “NO PARKING”.
DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of University Park, Texas, on the____day
of ________2015.
APPROVED:
____________________________________
OLIN B. LANE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________________
CHRISTINE GREEN, CITY SECRETARYAPPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
CITY ATTORNEY
(RLD/05-20-15/TM71690)
ORDINANCE NO. ___________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS, PROHIBITING PARKING ON THE PORTIONS OF VASSAR DRIVE AND TURTLE
CREEK BOULEVARD ABUTTING BYRD PARK; PROVIDING FOR THE ERECTION
OF SIGNS INDICATING NO PARKING AT ANY TIME; PROVIDING FOR THE
REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF
TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS ($200.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City ofUniversity Park, Texas, on the ____day
of ______2015.
APPROVED:
____________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________________
CITY SECRETARY