Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda 06-19-07 WebAGENDA #2713 CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK COUNCIL CHAMBER TUESDAY, JUNE 19, 2007 5:00 P.M. 3:00-4:00 PM DISCUSS CHASE BANK PROJECT, City Hall Conference Room 4:00-5:00 PM WORK SESSION FOR AGENDA REVIEW, City Hall Conference Room PUBLIC COMMENTS Questions and comments regarding Main Agenda items should be made when that item is addressed by the City Council. Please be advised that under the Texas Open Meetings Act, the council may not discuss or act at this meeting on a matter not listed on the Agenda. Other questions or private comments for the City Council or Staff should be directed to that individual immediately following the meeting. I.CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION– Councilmember Jerry Grable PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – Councilmember Jerry Grable/Boy Scouts – INTRODUCTION OF COUNCILMayor James H. Holmes, III INTRODUCTION OF STAFF– City Manager Bob Livingston II.AWARDS AND RECOGNITION PRESENTATION: First Place Award in the Category of Best External Newsletter from TAMIO DEPARTMENT PINS: Human Resources Director Luanne Hanford, 20 years; Finance Director Kent Austin, 20 years and Fire Department Captain Brian Thomas, 15 years for a total of 55 years of service to the city. RETIREMENT: Presentation of Retirement Plaque to Maintenance Technician Wayne McKenzie III.CONSENT AGENDA A.CONSIDER: Final Payment to United Fence Contractors for Installation of Ornamental Railing along Turtle Creek University Boulevard and Vassar Drive for $6,423.01 B. CONSIDER: Approval of city council meeting minutes for June 5, 2007 IV.MAIN AGENDA A.DISCUSS: Matters Relating to the Legacy-Hillcrest Zoning Change Including But Not Limited to the Draft Planned Development Conditions and Traffic Impact Analysis B.DISCUSS: Information Provided by Traffic Consultant Related to Request for 25MPH Speed Limit Designation C.CONSIDER: Resolution Adopting First Phase of Snider-Hillcrest Strategic Plan D.CONSIDER: Proposed Appointments to the Snider Plaza Strategic Plan Committee E.CONSIDER: Request for Burleson Park Rental for Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer 3-Day Walk F.CONSIDER: Fountain for Sis Germany Park G.CONSIDER: Ordinance Amendment to Provide Special Exception for Front Yard Fence in SF-2 Zoning District H.CONSIDER: Ordinance Annexing Strip of Land along Northwest Highway, Airline to Hillcrest I.CONSIDER: Gateway Entrance Features J.CONSIDER: Request to Exchange Property near Peek Service Center K.CONSIDER: Paving Program for Alley Parkway V. ITEMS FROM THE FLOOR Anyone wishing to address an item not on the Agenda should do so at this time. As authorized by Section 551.071(2) of the Texas Government Code, this meeting may be convened into Closed Executive Session for the purpose of seeking confidential legal advice from the City Attorney on any Agenda items listed herein. AGENDA MEMO (6/19/07 AGENDA) DATE: June 14, 2007 TO: Bob Livingston City Manager FROM: Bob Whaling, P.E. City Engineer Final Payment for Project No. 43710 (Installation of ornamental railing SUBJECT: along Turtle Creek University Boulevard, and Vassar Drive) Consent Agenda CONSIDER APPROVAL OF FINAL PAYMENT TO UNITED FENCE CONTRACTORS, INC. in the amount of $6,423.01 for the labor and materials furnished for the installation of ornamental railing along Turtle Creek University Boulevard, and Vassar Drive, Project No. 43710. The budgeted account number is 42-42-4420, Project No. 43710.2300. AGENDA MEMO (6/19/07 AGENDA) DATE: June 14, 2007 TO: Bob Livingston City Manager FROM: Bob Whaling, P.E. City Engineer SUBJECT: Final Payment for Project No. 43710 (Installation of ornamental railing along Turtle Creek University Boulevard, and Vassar Drive) The City Council approved a contract in the amount of $62,848.50 on January 3, 2006, to United Fence Contractors, Inc. for the installation of ornamental railing along Turtle Creek University Boulevard, and Vassar Drive. The Engineering Department has accepted the completed work. The actual work performed and the material furnished as provided by the contract and field changes brought University Park’s project total to $64,230.13 (102.2% of the original contract). Staff recommends final payment for this project in the amount of $6,423.01 be made to United Fence Contractors, Inc. PROJECT COST HISTORY City Council Approved Contract 01/03/2006 $62,848.50 100.00% The total cumulative value of the contract was increased by $1,381.63 (2.20%) over the original approved contract. MINUTES #2711 CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER TUESDAY, JUNE 5, 2007, 5:00 P.M. At 2:30 p.m., the council held a discussion on family size and occupancy standards, tandem parking and plate height in multi-family districts. Mr. Dan Sefko of Duncan, Sefko and Associates was contracted by the City to draft specific zoning and land development standards. The purpose of the discussion was to hear a preliminary report from Mr. Sefko on these items. Mayor James H. Holmes, III, convened the city council into an executive session in the conference room at 3:00 p.m. for a consultation with the City Attorney regarding a deliberation on real property under Sections 551.071 and 551.072 of the Government Code. The executive session was closed at 3:55 p.m. No action was voted on or taken during the meeting. Mayor Holmes opened the regular city council meeting at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber. Present were Mayor Pro Tempore Harry Shawver and Councilmembers Syd Carter, Kelly Walker and Jerry Grable. Also in attendance were City Manager Bob Livingston, City Attorney Rob Dillard and Deputy City Secretary Kate Smith. Two Boy Scouts introduced themselves and stated the badge upon which they were working: Christian Lundberg, 7500 Turtle Creek Blvd. and Cameron Lundberg, 7500 Turtle Creek Blvd. AWARDS AND RECOGNITION RECOGNITION: Police Chief Gary Adams recognized two Retiring Reserve Officers from the Police Department, John Holt, 27 years and Ron Watts, 27 years, for a total of 54 years of service to the city. Councilmember Walker moved approval of the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Carter seconded, and the vote was unanimous to approve the following: CONSENT AGENDA CONSIDER RESOLUTION ACCEPTING STUDY OF TRAFFIC CONDITIONS AND CONCLUSIONS AT PARK CITIES BAPTIST CHURCH: One of the conditions of the Planned Development for the Park Cities Baptist Church required the church to commission an additional traffic study after the parking garage had been in operation. The report was prepared by Traffic Engineer John DeShazo, P.E. and was reviewed by staff. RESOLUTION NO. 07-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS, APPROVING AND ACCEPTING THE TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE FROM THE PARK CITIES BAPTIST CHURCH AS REQUIRED BY THE SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF PD-29; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. CONSIDER PROPOSAL FROM R.L. GOODSON IN THE AMOUNT OF $8,500 (PLUS REIMBURSABLES) TO PROVIDE SURVEYING SERVICES ASSOCIATED WITH ALLEY AND UTILITY EASEMENT INVESTIGATION: The east half of the 3400 block between McFarlin and Asbury does not have an alley or alley easement. This has not been an issue until recent redevelopment made the city aware that some parcels had dedicated half a right-of-way by plat, some by separate instrument, and some did not. In an effort to determine exactly what the city has in the subject block, the city solicited a proposal from RL Goodson and asked that they provide professional surveying and research services to investigate the issue. R.L. Goodson submitted a proposal in the amount of $8,500 (plus reimbursables). Staff requested the deletion of the "limit of liability" clause. CONSIDER FURNITURE RENTAL FOR MODULAR BUILDING ASSOCIATED WITH CITY HALL RENOVATION: The city has been working with Business Interiors for rental of pre-owned, temporary furniture for the portable building that will house Municipal Court, Utility Billing and the Receptionist during renovation of City Hall. Business Interiors submitted a quote for furniture rental for $1,530.00 per month. With a one-time fee of $1,040.00 for labor to install and remove the furniture, this totals $19,400.00 for a twelve month lease. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES: For May 22, 2007. MAIN AGENDA PUBLIC HEARING FOR SNIDER PLAZA STRATEGIC PLAN CONTINUED FORM MAY ST 1 CITY COUNCIL MEETING: Townscape, Inc. was contracted by the city in early 2005 to conduct a study and prepare a Strategic Plan to guide the future development of Snider Plaza. In developing the Strategic Plan, Dennis Wilson and his team held a series of neighborhood meetings with property owners, residents and merchants to discuss the issues and draft proposals over the period July, 2005-March, 2006. City Council also convened a joint work session with the Planning and Zoning Commission on November 13, 2006 and discussed the draft Strategic Plan. At that meeting, council provided directions to staff to move forward with the formal adoption of the plan. The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on February 19, 2007 and considered the Strategic Plan at its regular meeting on March 19, 2007. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the Strategic Plan with two conditions: a building height of four (4) stores must be defined, and the Rosedale opening should be implemented in the short term. The City Council held a public hearing and considered the Strategic Plan at its regular meeting on May 1, 2007. The item was tabled with specific directions for the plan to be revised to remove all references to residential uses, the village green and the removal of on-street parking. Mayor Holmes re-opened the Public Hearing and stated that the Strategic Plan had been revised and the following items had been removed from the Strategic Plan: all references to allowing residential uses in Snider Plaza, references to a Village Green and the removal of on-street parking. Mr. Bob Teeter, 3309 Colgate, spoke in opposition to the ordinance and stated that Council should table the item and first appoint the committee. Mr. Peter Smith, 4208 Belclaire Avenue, Dallas, TX 75205, spoke in opposition to the plan and stated that he is opposed to the height restrictions and requested that council table the item. Mr. Roger Fullington, 3801 McFarlin, spoke in opposition to the ordinance. He is opposed to the portion of the plan that suggests using the same building materials for future construction as this would create a homogenous look and destroy the eclectic feel of the plaza. Mr. Max Fuqua, 6717 Snider Plaza, submitted a letter signed by Snider Plaza merchants. The letter read, “This letter serves to certify that Max Fuqua, President of the University Park Merchants association has my full support and permission to speak on my behalf regarding the Townscape Master plan.” Mr. Fuqua indicated that he had this available for the May 1, 2007 meeting, but wished to submit it for record at this time. Mr. John Jackson, 3425 Colgate, requested clarification be added to the plan regarding building requirements if a building is destroyed by fire. He questioned if the exact same thing could be rebuilt. The Mayor requested Dennis Wilson respond to some of the concerns just presented. Mayor Holmes closed the Public Hearing. Councilmember Grable asked City Attorney Rob Dillard what currently happens if a building is destroyed by fire. Mr. Dillard responded that Snider Plaza is in a PD and that determines the footprint of the building. CONSIDER ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE SNIDER PLAZA STRATEGIC PLAN AS MODIFIED AT THE DIRECTION OF COUNCIL: Mayor Holmes moved approval of the ordinance adopting the Snider Plaza Strategic Plan as modified at the direction of council. As the motion was not seconded, the ordinance did not pass. DISCUSS PARKING SPACE ISSUES IN SNIDER PLAZA: The Snider Plaza Strategic Plan developed by Dennis Wilson details a current shortfall of approximately 200 spaces. Staff was contacted recently by one of the merchants, who is concerned about lack of control of the spaces along the Rosedale frontage of her business at 6701 Snider Plaza. The subject spaces are, for the most part, on private property; however, the rear of each space encroaches on the public right-of- way by a couple of feet. The proprietor has requested that the parking spaces be re-striped so that all of the spaces are located entirely on private property. Pursuant to advice from the city Attorney, the city has for years contended that if any parking space encroaches upon the r-o-w, the city controls the space. Most of the spaces in the shopping center have been public parking for decades, and it is staff’s position that the city should control the parking spaces, even if they transcend the property line. Staff received an e-mail from the property owner’s attorney, indicating that they do not want the parking requirements changed. Mr. Bob Teeter, 3309 Colgate, and John Jackson, 3425 Colgate, urged council not to change the parking requirements. Councilmember Shawver moved to continue the present parking enforcement in Snider Plaza. Councilmember Grable seconded, and the vote was unanimous to continue the present parking enforcement in Snider Plaza. CONSIDER PROPOSAL TO INSTALL INFORMATION KIOSKS IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT- OF-WAY AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN THE CITY: Mayor Holmes stated that he would abstain from voting and recused himself on this item. Reynolds Outdoor initially requested consideration to install information kiosks in Snider Plaza. City Council discussed that request on June 20, 2006 and referred the item to UDADAC for review. UDADAC discussed the request at its meeting on July 11, 2006 and recommended the proposal subject to further review of Kiosk design to reduce the size and a detailed site plan showing specific locations. The request was presented to the Snider Plaza Merchants Association on October 3, 2006 and most of the merchants were not in favor of the placement of the Kiosks in Snider Plaza. Reynolds Outdoor subsequently withdrew that request. Reynolds Outdoor has submitted a new request which is scaled down to specific locations at Airline/Mockingbird, Hillcrest/Daniel, Lovers Lane and Preston Center. The current sign ordinance prohibits off-premises signage in the city. In order to implement this proposal, the city must establish a special sign district and approve of a license agreement. Reynolds Outdoor will reimburse the City $12,500 per year for 20 years or a discounted prepayment of $200,000 for 10 two-sided kiosks. If the kiosks are expanded to three sides, Reynolds will pay $25,000 per year for 20 years or a discounted prepayment of $400,000. Mr. Max Fuqua, 6717 Snider Plaza, stated that the Merchant’s Association reviewed the new proposal at their meeting this morning and they were in support of the item if the money generated by the signs goes to placing additional parking in the Chase Bank Development. Councilmember Carter asked Mr. Reynolds if his company was sold what assurances the city would have that the advertising content would be the same. Mr. Reynolds responded that they could address content control issues in the new agreement. Ms. Carolyn Loy, 4001 Bryn Mawr, asked if the Public Safety Committee had reviewed the proposal. Councilmember Walker stated that she had a concern with several of the proposed locations. Councilmember Carter asked City Manager Bob Livingston if the sign ordinance would have to be amended. Mr. Livingston responded that it would have to be amended and that it would be a several month process. Councilmember Grable moved to deny the proposal to install information kiosks in the public right-of-way at various locations in the city. Councilmember Shawver seconded, and the request was denied with Councilmember Carter voting in favor of the proposal and Mayor Holmes abstaining. CONSIDER ORDINANCE PROHIBITING PARKING ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE 3100 BLOCK OF UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD: SMU is currently developing the design for reconstruction of the University Boulevard/Airline intersection. The change will link University Boulevard through the campus between Hillcrest and Airline, and will accommodate one-way traffic in the eastbound direction. The proposed improvements at the intersection detail a westbound right-turn lane at the Airline intersection. This will require the parking along the north side of University, Durham to Airline, to be eliminated along the south side of the Kappa Alpha Theta and Delta Delta Delta sorority houses. In addition to their request for the no parking designation, SMU requested that the City perform a signal warrant analysis for the intersection. The cost of the warrant analysis and the cost of the signal will be borne by SMU. Councilmember Shawver moved approval of the ordinance. Councilmember Grable seconded, and the vote was unanimous to approve the ordinance prohibiting parking on the north side of the 3100 block of University Boulevard. ORDINANCE NO. 07/19 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS, PROHIBITING PARKING ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE 3100 BLOCK OF UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD FROM THE POINT OF ITS INTERSECTION WITH AIRLINE TO THE POINT OF ITS INTERSECTION WITH DURHAM; PROVIDING FOR THE ERECTION OF SIGNS; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS ($200.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. CONSIDER BID NO. 07-03, FURNITURE FOR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT: Bids were taken on RFP Depot for the purchase of patio chairs, patio tables, and leather recliners for the Fire Department. This furniture was selected in coordination with Onesia Rigney, interior designer for City Hall renovation. Fifty vendors viewed the bid document; three vendors submitted bids. Business Interiors was the low bidder for a total of $18,480.81. Councilmember Grable moved approval of Bid No. 07-03, furniture for the Fire Department. Councilmember Carter seconded, and the vote was unanimous to approve the bid for furniture for the Fire Department. ITEMS FROM THE FLOOR Mr. John Jackson, 3425 Colgate, stated that a great deal of time and effort had been put into the Snider Plaza Strategic Plan document. He requested that council appoint the committee to look th at the plan. After some discussion, the Mayor requested that an item be added to the June 19 Agenda to consider the proposed appointments to the Snider Plaza Strategic Plan Committee. Mr. Max Fuqua, 6717 Snider Plaza, stated that on January 16, 2007, council approved the removal of the 2-hour parking restriction in the 7000 block of Hillcrest. Mr. Fuqua said that he was also speaking on behalf of Angelo Chantilis, owner of Burger House, and that they would like the 2-hour parking requirement reinstated. City Manager Bob Livingston stated that this was a request made by the owner of the Tom Thumb property. Mr. Jeff O’Neil, owner of Osgood-O’Neil Salon, 6932 Snider Plaza, wanted to know who to speak to about parking issues on Snider Plaza. City Manager Bob Livingston referred him to the Community Development Manager. th PASSED AND APPROVED this 19 of June 2007. James H. Holmes, III, Mayor ATTEST: Kate Smith, Deputy City Secretary AGENDA MEMO (06/19/2007 AGENDA) DATE: June 19, 2007 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Harry Persaud, MRTPI, AICP, Community Development Manager SUBJECT: Discuss matters relating to the Legacy-Hillcrest Zoning Change including but not limited to the Draft PD conditions and Traffic Impact Analyses and provide directions to staff. Background/Analysis: In 2001, P&Z denied a request by Legacy Hillcrest Investments for 270,500 sq. ft. of mixed uses on the subject tract. Another request for 290,000 sq. ft. was considered on March 6, 2006. P&Z requested the applicants to consider amending that concept plan in view of the strong comments made by residents opposed to the proposed development. The request was amended to 260,000 sq. ft. and P&Z denied that request on April 17, 2006. The applicants then submitted a request for approval of an amended concept plan for 217,500 sq. ft. which was considered by P&Z on July 17, 2006. City Council held a public hearing on September 19, 2006 and directed staff to hire a Traffic Engineer to conduct an independent Traffic Impact Analysis of the proposed development. City Council held a work session on April 10, 2007, discussed the proposed zoning change and received more information from the applicant. On May 22, 2007, City Council received and discussed the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) prepared by Jody Short, P.E, (Lee Engineering) At that meeting Elizabeth Crow, P. E. (DeShazo-Tang Associates) representing the neighborhood, provided specific comments regarding the TIA. Jody Short will respond to those questions and th comments at the June 19 meeting. Attached is a summary report from Lee Engineering. th Also staff has prepared an extended list of PD conditions attached for discussion at the June 19 meeting. Recommendation: At its regular meeting on July 17, 2006, P&Z voted 3 – 2 to recommend approval ofaPD Concept Plan with a total of 135,000 sq. ft. gross floor area, excluding the 8 units of town homes, subject to the following conditions: (1) Height of the proposed building on the O-2 site shall be limited to the height of the existing building (2) A maximum of 25,000 square feet for restaurant /retail space (3) Building height west of the common area shall not exceed 35 feet. (4) Parking to be provided at the rate of 1:200 square feet for retail and restaurant, and 1:300 square feet for office space and (5) with 19 staff conditions. Attachments: 1. Summary report from Jody Short responding to questions and comments regarding the Traffic Impact Analysis. 2. Draft PD conditions DRAFT LEGACY-HILLCREST PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PROPOSED PD CONDITIONS NOTE: Items in bold text indicates that staff is currently working with the applicant to resolve outstanding issues . Concept Plan. Development of the Property must be in substantial conformance with the Concept Plan attached as Exhibit "A". A Detailed Site Plan must be approved prior to the issue of a building permit. (a) Single-family Units. Units intended for single-family occupancy must be located on that portion designated on the Concept Plan fronting Haynie. The exact number and depth of the single-family units shall be finalized and shown on the Detailed Site Plan. A minimum of four and a maximum of eight single-family homes must be built in this area. The homes must have an architectural facade compatible with those in the adjoining residential neighborhood. Each home must have a front door allowing access to and from Haynie. Each home must have a minimum of two underground parking spaces. A maximum of one residential unit may be located in the penthouse of the building located to the east of the Common Area. (b) Other uses permitted. Except for that portion of the Concept Plan specifically designated for single-family use, the following use categories as stated in the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance are permitted on all portions of the Property: (1) Educational, Institutional and Special Uses; (2) Utility, Accessory and Incidental Uses; and (3) Retail and Service Type Uses (including office, retail, bank, restaurant, library and accessory uses). Specific square footages and locations for these uses shall be shown on the Detailed Site Plan. Retail, restaurant, bank or library uses shall be provided at grade along the Hillcrest frontage and along Daniel Avenue. Multi-family units may be located on the second or third floors of the building located to the west of the Common Area which fronts on Daniel. (c) Library Space. The Detailed Site Plan must contain the library use. Documentation confirming the long-term library use for the Property must be submitted to the City with the Detailed Site Plan. This documentation must ensure that (i) sufficient square footage is made available for a quality library use, and (ii) the library shall have the right to utilize the restricted space as long as the library operates on the Property, and (iii) be in the form of a 99-year lease or equivalent conveyance with options to renew. (d) Density. The maximum square footages for each use are stated on the Concept Plan as follows: OFFICE 175,000 BANK 15,000 RETAIL 22,500 RESTAURANT 17,500 SF 8 units LIBRARY 30,000 *Not to exceed 217,500 sq.ft. plus single-family residential use Without specific authorization from the City Council at the Detailed Site Plan stage, the maximum combined floor area for all uses other than single-family is 217,500 total square feet. Accessory storage square footage does not count toward the maximum total square footage for the development. (e) Yard, Lot, Space and Height Regulations. Maximum yard, lot, space and height regulations are shown on the attached concept plan and elevations. The penthouse/mechanical improvements on the top of the building adjacent to Hillcrest must be located at least 20 feet from the Haynie side of the building, 20 feet from the Hillcrest side of the building, and 20 feet from the western side of the building. An additional mechanical element can be included on top of the buildings located west of the Common Area which must be setback a minimum of 20 feet from Daniel. (f) Common Area. Details of the improvements to the Common Area as drawn on the Concept Plan shall be described and shown on the Detailed Site Plan. Architectural or structural features may be erected above-grade to serve as an end cap for Snider Plaza. (g) Trash Receptacles. The final location of trash receptacles will be shown on the Detailed Site Plan and must be located within 40 feet of the locations shown on the Concept Plan. Dumpsters shall not be located in the rights-of-way, and commercial sanitation trucks may not block traffic to access dumpsters during regular business hours. (h) Off-street Parking and Loading. Parking spaces shall be calculated in accordance with the Urban League Institute ("ULI") mixed-use reduction methodology. At the time of Detailed Site Plan approval, the number of on-site parking spaces must comply with the ULI mixed use reduction calculation. The parking design and layout including the underground parking structure shall be reviewed with the Detailed Site Plan. The curb cut on Haynie to be shown on the Detailed Site Plan must be located within 60 feet of the location shown on the Concept Plan. All reserved spaces shall be excluded from the shared parking calculations.No on-street parking shall be counted toward meeting the proposed development requirements. Required parking spaces shall be wholly contained within the below-grade parking garage Street Improvements. Recommended traffic mitigation improvements will require (i) the Hillcrest-Daniel intersection to be reconstructed, NOT simply “adding lane width”. Details of construction (including design services, traffic signals, drainage, utilities, street lights, and etc) and level of participation should be identified in the PD ordinance. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the Hillcrest/Daniel intersection improvements shown on Exhibit "B" must be completed. The City, at its discretion, may construct additional improvements to the intersection as shown on Exhibit "C". However, construction of only the improvements shown on Exhibit "B" are a condition to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. (j) Traffic on Haynie west of Hillcrest. Traffic exiting the garage on Haynie shall only proceed east to Hillcrest. (k) Streetscape. On Daniel and Hillcrest, the following streetscape standards must be met: (i) minimum 1-foot wide dismount adjacent to on-street parking spaces; (ii) minimum 5-foot wide tree planting zone with tree grates; and (iii) minimum 10-foot wide sidewalks. Balconies and canopies are permitted over the streetscape. On Haynie between Hillcrest and the Common Area, the following streetscape standards must be met: a minimum 8-foot wide sidewalk with 5-foot tree plant zone either in the sidewalk or adjacent to the parking spaces shown on the Concept Plan. All street trees shall be planted on 22-foot centers (or as may be otherwise approved by the City) along all street frontages, except where prohibited due to driveway access. Pedestrian lighting and streetscape furniture will be provided by the Development which shall complement any standards that may be approved by the City for the Snider Plaza area. (l) Landscaping. Final landscaping must be shown on the Detailed Site Plan. All plant material must be maintained in a healthy, growing condition at all times. (m) Signs. Signage size, display and locations must be provided with the Detailed Site Plan. A special sign district may be created as part of this project. No tenant sign shall be located above the first floor of any structure. (n) City R.O.W. The City agrees to abandon the existing alley right-of-way on the Property and convey title to the Developer as surplus property in accordance with City policies, rules and regulations at the time of platting. The City agrees to abandon all or a portion of the adjacent Hillcrest right-of-way as shown on Exhibit "D" and convey title to the Developer as surplus property in accordance with City policies, rules and regulations. The abandonment and/or sale of City right-of-way is subject to City Council consideration and approval. (o) Advisory Board. An advisory board comprised of area residents, merchants, commercial owners and the Developer will be created. This advisory board will meet no less than once each sixty (60) days for presentation, discussion and input as to the project. The Developer shall also hold one or more town hall meetings at least thirty (30) days in advance of the P&Z meeting where the Detailed Site Plan will be considered. (p) Site Utilities. Site utilities including but not limited to the specific location, number and spacing of fire hydrants, will be reviewed with the detailed site plan submittal. (q) Parallel Parking. Developer will submit details of lane configuration, storage and transition with the Detailed Site Plan for further review. Parallel parking on the North side of Daniel near the Hillcrest intersection will impede traffic flows to the Daniel/Hillcrest intersection and staff recommends deleting these spaces. Architectural Articulation. All building façades fronting public streets must (r) have offsets in the plane of the façade, and no more than 75 percent of the total face area may occur in a single vertical plane (minimum 25 percent cumulative offsets required). The required offsets must consist of projections or recesses from the primary façade. Projections in the required front yard are included in this calculation. At the Detailed Site Plan stage, the City Council has the discretion to not approve the materials shown on the elevations for the facades of the buildings. The applicant shall have the right to resubmit the elevations with different façade materials (s) Parking Spaces: Developer agrees to make parking spaces in the proposed underground parking garage available to the City based on the following. Within 120 days after approval of the concept plan, the City shall notify the Developer in writing of the number of spaces ( increments of 50 not to exceed 200) in the garage it desires for the City’s use (City Spaces). The City shall pay for the City Spaces by a ground lease for the land containing the City Spaces plus one lump sum payment equivalent to multiplying the number of spaces by $_________ (ESTIMATED COST TO BE $30,000 BUT FINAL AMOUNT TO BE AGREED TO) The City Spaces cannot be used to satisfy parking code requirements for properties situated in Snider Plaza. In addition, the City shall pay its percentage allocation of the expenses to operate the parking garage on a quarterly basis. With the City’s commitment to pay for the City Spaces, the detailed site plan shall reflect the requested number of City Spaces. (t) Leases for the property shall include a provision requiring employees of tenants to park in the on-site parking garage. (u) Construction Fence: An 8 –foot solid plywood screening fence shall be installed around the construction site during construction and remain in place while construction is ongoing. The fence shall be painted green and installed prior to demolition of any structure on the site. (v) Explosives: No explosives will be permitted in the process of demolition and construction on the site. (w) Neighborhood Liaison: During construction the developer will provide a liaison to respond to questions and complaints from residents. The developer shall provide adequate notice to residents of the name and methods of contacting the liaison 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The contact name and number will be posted on the construction site. (x) Expiration of PD: The Planned Development Concept Plan will expire if a detailed site plan is not approved by December 1, 2008. (y) Construction Vehicles. No parking of construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted on City Streets, except for streets which are closed to construction. All parking shall be accommodated on the site. If additional parking is required, the developer shall provide off site parking and shuttle workers to the site. (z) Construction Hours. Unless written permission is granted by the Director of Public Works, construction work on the site is restricted to Monday through Saturday, from 7:00 am to 6:00 pm. AGENDA MEMO (06-19-07 AGENDA) DATE: June 14, 2007 TO: Bob Livingston City Manager FROM: Gene R. Smallwood, P.E. Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Receive clarifications to the Chase Bank TIA. Background. Following the last consideration of the Traffic Impact Analysis for the proposed Chase Bank improvements, the traffic engineer representing the neighborhood provided certain comments. Lee Engineering incorporated those comments into the attached “clarification” report. Jody Short indicated that the traffic from the proposed facility do not adversely impact traffic in the surrounding streets and intersections. Discussion. Jody Short will be available to address questions form the Council. AGENDA MEMO (06-19-07 AGENDA) DATE: June 14, 2007 TO: Bob Livingston City Manager FROM: Gene R. Smallwood, P.E. Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Discuss information provided by traffic consultant related to request for 25-mph speed limit designation. Background. In response to a request last Fall to reduce the speed limit on residential streets, the City Council directed staff to commission a traffic engineering study. The consultant, Dannie Cummings, P.E. with C-P Engineering, established a pilot area, bounded by Hillcrest, Southwestern, Boedeker, and Lovers lane, which was posted (by Council ordinance) as 25- mph. Prior to installation of new speed limit signs on streets within the pilot study area, Mr. Cummings conducted speed studies to determine baseline data. Six months later, he again collected speed data to determine the impact of the lower speed designation. That data is attached for your review and consideration. Mr. Cummings will be available at the Council meeting to address any questions from the Council. Discussion. Staff recommends the Council ask the Public Safety Advisory Committee to review the information and make a recommendation on the 25-mph issue. Nina Wilson From: Bud Smallwood Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 4:12 PM To: 'Barrett, Rick' Cc: Bob Livingston; Gary Adams; 'Dannie Cummings'; James H. Holmes; 'jerrygrable@charter.net'; Harry R. Shawver; 'kelly@benchmarkenviro.com'; 'logap@sbcglobal.net' Subject: 25-mph Speed Limit Attachments: Table I.PDF; Table II.PDF; Table III.PDF Mr. Barrett:   I am forwarding the data that traffic engineer Dannie Cummings developed for the 25-mph pilot area. I will present the data to the City Council next Tuesday and ask them to refer the information to their Public Safety Advisory Committee for consideration.   Table I compares the “before” data against the “after” data for the eight east/west street sections in the study.  Please note that there is no “before” data for the study section on Bryn Mawr between Airline and Durham.  This data was compromised and I did not notice it in time to re-count the street.  Dave and his crew had already uncovered the 25 mph signs.   Table II compares the “before” data against the “after” data for the four north/south street sections in the study.   Table III summarizes all this data into a “before” and “after” comparison will all 12 street sections th combined.  The bottom line result is the “Combined” line in this table.  The overall 85 percentile “before” thth speed was 31.6 mph.  The overall 85 percentile “after” speed was 31.2 mph.  The overall 85 percentile speed dropped by 0.4 mph after a six month period of 25 mph signs in this study area.     Tuesday’s meeting (06.19.07) will be held at City Hall at 5:00 p.m.   Thanks Bud     Gene R. "Bud" Smallwood, P.E. Director of Public Works   City of University Park 3800 University Blvd University Park, TX 75205   214.987.5400 bsmallwood@uptexas.org     6/13/2007 TABLEIII RESIDENTIAL25MPHSPEEDLIMITSTUDY ALLSTREETS STREETSBEFOREAFTERDIFFERENCE E/WSTREETS30.8mph30.1mph-0.7mph N/SSTREETS32.3mph32.1mph-0.2mph COMBINED 31.6mph31.2mph-0.4mph AGENDA MEMO (06/19/2007 AGENDA) DATE: June 19, 2007 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Harry Persaud, MRTPI, AICP, Community Development Manager SUBJECT: Consideration of a Resolution adopting the First Phase of the Snider- Hillcrest Strategic Plan. Background/Analysis: Townscape, Inc. was contracted by the City early 2005 to conduct a study and prepare a Strategic Plan to guide the future development of Snider Plaza. In developing the Strategic Plan, Dennis Wilson and his team held a series of neighborhood meetings with property owners, residents and merchants to discuss the issues and draft proposals over the period July, 2005 through March, 2006. City Council also convened a joint work session with the Planning and Zoning Commission on November 13, 2006 and discussed the draft Strategic Plan. At that meeting, Council provided directions to staff to move forward with the formal adoption of the plan. The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on February 19, 2007 and considered the Strategic Plan at its regular meeting on March 19, 2007. Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the Strategic Plan with two conditions: (1) Building height of four (4) stores must be defined. (2) The Rosedale opening should be implemented in the short term. City Council held a public hearing and considered the Strategic Plan at its regular meeting on May 1, 2007. The item was tabled with specific directions for the Plan to be revised to remove all references to residential uses, the village green and the removal of on-street parking. The Draft Strategic Plan has been revised as follows: Removed all reference to allowing residential uses in Snider Plaza ? Removed all references to a Village Green ? Beefed up the streetscaping discussion on Snider Plaza (p. 8) ? Updated the near-term parking numbers, and modified the description of issues. ? City Council continued the public hearing and considered an ordinance to adopt the Plan on June 5, 2007. The Ordinance was denied at that meeting. A draft resolution adopting the First Phase of the Snider-Hillcrest Strategic Plan is attached. Recommendation: Staff recommends: (1) Approval of the First Phase of the Snider- Hillcrest Strategic Plan by Resolution attached. (2) Appoint an advisory committee to develop detailed standards for the implementation of the Strategic Plan. Attachments: 1.Snider-Hillcrest Strategic Plan 2.Resolution adopting the first phase of the Snider- Hillcrest Strategic Plan RESOLUTION NO. _______ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS, APPROVING PHASE 1 OF THE SNIDER-HILLCREST STRATEGIC PLAN, A COPY OF WHICH IS ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT “A”; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS: SECTION 1. Phase 1 of the Snider-Hillcrest Strategic Plan, which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein, is approved to provide a basis for the development of specific ordinances and regulations for sound long-range development of the City and to promote public health, safety and general welfare. SECTION 2. That this Resolution shall take effect immediately from and after its passage, and it is accordingly so resolved. DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of University Park, Texas, this the 19 day of June 2007. APPROVED: _______________________________________ JAMES H. HOLMES III, MAYOR ATTEST: _______________________________________ NINA WILSON, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________________ City Attorney (RLD/06/07/07/17353) Í Ò × Ü Û Î ñ Ø × Ô Ô Ý Î Û Í Ì ÍÌÎßÌÛÙ×Ý ÐÔßÒ ËÒ×ÊÛÎÍ×ÌÇ ÐßÎÕ ÌÑÉÒÍÝßÐÛô ×ÒÝ Õ×ÓÔÛÇóØÑÎÒ ú ßÍÍÑÝ×ßÌÛÍ Ö«²» ïçô îððé ÝÑÒÌÛÒÌÍ Ý±²¬»²¬­òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòò · Þ¿½µ¹®±«²¼òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòò ï Ю±½»­­òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòò î ɸ¿¬ ©» ¸¿ª» ¸»¿®¼òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòò î ׳¿¹» ¿²¼ ×¼»²¬·¬§òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòò ì Ý·®½«´¿¬·±² ¿²¼ α¿¼©¿§­òòòòòòòòòòòòò ç п®µ·²¹òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòò ïí ׳°´»³»²¬¿¬·±² ͬ®¿¬»¹§òòòòòòòòòòòòòòò îï ͸±®¬ Ì»®³ øïîóîì ³±²¬¸­÷òòòòòòòòòò îï Ó·¼óÌ»®³ øîóë §»¿®­÷òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòò îî Ô±²¹ Ì»®³ øëõ §»¿®­÷òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòò îî · ÍÒ×ÜÛÎ ñ Ø×ÔÔÝÎÛÍÌ ÍÌÎßÌÛÙ×Ý ÐÔßÒ ÞË×ÔÜ×ÒÙ ÑÒ ÉØßÌ ×Í ÙÎÛßÌ ÞßÝÕÙÎÑËÒÜ Í²·¼»® д¿¦¿ ·­ «²·¯«» ¿³±²¹ ½±³³«²·¬§ ®»¬¿·´ ½»²¬»®­ ·² ¬¸» ®»¹·±²ò ׬ ·­ ¼·ª·¼»¼ ·²¬± ­³¿´´ °®±°»®¬§ ±©²»®­¸·°­ô ¿²¼ ·­ ´¿®¹»´§ ½±³°®·­»¼ ±º ±²»ó±ºó¿óµ·²¼ ­¬±®»­ ¿²¼ ®»­¬¿«®¿²¬­ò ݱ³°»¬·²¹ ½»²¬»®­ ´·µ» Ø·¹¸´¿²¼ п®µ Ê·´´¿¹»ô Ó±½µ·²¹¾·®¼ ͬ¿¬·±² ¿²¼ É»­¬ Ê·´´¿¹» ¿®» »¿½¸ «²¼»® ­·²¹´» ±©²»®­¸·° ¿²¼ ¿¬¬®¿½¬ ½¸¿·² ­¬±®»­ ¿²¼ ®»­¬¿«®¿²¬­ò ̸» ´·³·¬»¼ ¿½½»­­·¾·´·¬§ ±º Ͳ·¼»® д¿¦¿ º®±³ ³¿¶±® º®»»©¿§­ ¿²¼ ¸·¹¸©¿§­ ½±²¬®·¾«¬» ¬± ·¬­ «²¼»­·®¿¾·´·¬§ º±® ½¸¿·² ­¬±®»­ô ¾«¬ ³¿µ» ·¬ ¿² ¿¬¬®¿½¬·ª» ´±½¿¬·±² º±® ³±³ ¿²¼ °±°? ­¬±®»­ ¿²¼ ®»­¬¿«®¿²¬­ò Ͳ·¼»® д¿¦¿ ¿²¼ ¬¸» ¿¼¶¿½»²¬ ½±³³»®½·¿´ ¿®»¿­ º¿½·²¹ Ø·´´½®»­¬ ߪ»²«» ¸¿ª» ¸·­¬±®·½¿´´§ ­»®ª»¼ ¿­ ˲·ª»®­·¬§ п®µ?­ Ê·´´¿¹» Ý»²¬»®?ò ׬ ·­ ¬¸» ½»²¬®¿´ °´¿½» ©¸»®» ®»­·¼»²¬­ ¸¿ª» ¹¿¬¸»®»¼ ¬± ­¸±°ô »²¶±§ º±±¼ ¿²¼ ³·²¹´» º±® ¬¸» °¿­¬ è𠧻¿®­ò ̸» ½¸¿®¿½¬»® ±º ®»½»²¬ ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬­ô ¬¸» °®»­»²½» ±º ¬®¿ºº·½ ½±²¹»­¬·±²ô ¬¸» ´¿½µ ±º °¿®µ·²¹ô ¿²¼ ¬¸» ­°·´´ó±ª»® ±º °¿®µ·²¹ ·²¬± ­«®®±«²¼·²¹ ²»·¹¸¾±®¸±±¼­ ·­ ½¸¿´´»²¹·²¹ ¬¸» ¸»¿´¬¸ ¿²¼ ª·¬¿´·¬§ ±º Ͳ·¼»® д¿¦¿ò ײ ¿¼¼·¬·±²ô ®»½»²¬ ½±²­±´·¼¿¬·±²­ ±º °®±°»®¬·»­ ©·¬¸·² ¬¸» ¿®»¿ ½±«´¼ ´»¿¼ ¬± ¬¸» ®»¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ ±º ­±³» ¾´±½µ­ô ¿²¼ º«®¬¸»® ¬¸®»¿¬»² ¬¸» ¿®»¿?­ ½¸¿®¿½¬»®ò ̸»®» ·­ ¬®¿ºº·½ ½±²¹»­¬·±² ·² Ͳ·¼»® д¿¦¿ ¼«» ¬± ¿ ­¸±®¬¿¹» ±º °¿®µ·²¹ ­°¿½»­ò Û³°´±§»»­ ¿®» ¬¿µ·²¹ °®·³» °¿®µ·²¹ ­°¿½»­ ·² º®±²¬ ±º ­¬±®»­ô ¿²¼ °¿¬®±²­ ³«­¬ ½®«·­» ¬± º·²¼ ¿ ­°±¬ò ̸·­ ·­ ¿´­± ½¿«­·²¹ ­°·´´±ª»® °¿®µ·²¹ ·² ¬¸» ²»·¹¸¾±®¸±±¼­ ©»­¬ ±º ¬¸» °´¿¦¿ò Ø·´´½®»­¬ ­±«¬¸ ±º Ø¿§²» ·­ ¿ ³·¨¬«®» ±º ½±³³»®½·¿´ ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬­ ©·¬¸ ¿ ¾®±¿¼ ­©¿¬¸ ±º °¿®µ·²¹ ±«¬ º®±²¬ò ׬ ·­ ²±¬ ¿ ª»®§ ¿¬¬®¿½¬·ª» »²¬®§ ·²¬± ¬¸» Ý·¬§ò Ó«½¸ ½¿² ¾» ¼±²» ¬± °®±ª·¼» ¼»­·¹² ­¬¿²¼¿®¼­ ¿²¼ ­¬®»»¬­½¿°» ·³°®±ª»³»²¬­ ¬± ¬¸·­ ­»½¬·±² ±º Ø·´´½®»­¬ò Ý«®®»²¬ ¦±²·²¹ ®»¹«´¿¬·±²­ º±® ¬¸» ¿®»¿ ±²´§ ­°»½·º§ ¹»²»®¿´ ®»¬¿·´ ¿²¼ ±ºº·½» «­»­ ©·¬¸ ¿ º±«®ó ­¬±®§ ¸»·¹¸¬ ´·³·¬ ¿²¼ «° ¬± íæï ÚßÎò ̸»®» ¿®» ²± ­¬¿²¼¿®¼­ ¬± »²­«®» ¬¸¿¬ ²»© ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ ½±²¬®·¾«¬»­ ¬± ³¿µ·²¹ ¬¸» ¿®»¿ ³±®» «­»® ¿²¼ °»¼»­¬®·¿² º®·»²¼´§ò ̸» ´¿½µ ±º °¿®µ·²¹ ¿²¼ ¬¸» ½±²¹»­¬·±² ½®»¿¬»¼ ¾§ ª·­·¬±®­ ©¿·¬·²¹ º±® ¿ ½±²ª»²·»²¬ °¿®µ·²¹ ­°¿½» ²»¿® ¬¸»·® ¼»­¬·²¿¬·±² ¿®» ­»²¼·²¹ ˲·ª»®­·¬§ п®µ ®»­·¼»²¬­ ¬± ±¬¸»® ½±³°»¬·²¹ ¿®»¿ ½»²¬»®­ò ̸» °«®°±­» ±º ¬¸·­ ­¬«¼§ ·­ ¬©±º±´¼? º·®­¬ô ·¬ ·­ ¬± °®»°¿®» ¿ ½±²½»°¬«¿´ °´¿² ¿²¼ ­¬®¿¬»¹§ º±® Ͳ·¼»®ñØ·´´½®»­¬ ¬¸¿¬ ©·´´ ¹«·¼» º«¬«®» ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ ¿²¼ ®»¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ ·² ¬¸·­ ¿®»¿ ¿²¼ ¬¸¿¬ ©·´´ »²¸¿²½» ·¬ ¾±¬¸ º±® ¾«­·²»­­»­ ¿²¼ ¿­ ¿² ¿³»²·¬§ º±® ¬¸» Ý·¬§ ¿¬ó´¿®¹»ò ̸·­ ³¿§ ·²½´«¼» ­«½¸ ¬¸·²¹­ ¿­ ·²¬»®·³ ¿²¼ ´±²¹ ¬»®³ °¿®µ·²¹ ­¬®¿¬»¹·»­ô ²»¿® ¬»®³ °¸§­·½¿´ ·³°®±ª»³»²¬­ ¿²¼ ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ ­¬¿²¼¿®¼­ò ̸» ­»½±²¼ °«®°±­» ·­ ¬± ­»¬ ±«¬ ¿ °®±½»¼«®» ¬± ·³°´»³»²¬ ­°»½·º·½ »´»³»²¬­ ±º ¬¸» °´¿²ò ï Í ² × ¼ » ® ñ Ø × ´ ´ ½ ® » ­ ¬ Í ¬ ® ¿ ¬ » ¹ × ½ Ð ´ ¿ ² ÐÎÑÝÛÍÍ Ì¸·­ д¿² ¸¿­ »ª±´ª»¼ ¬¸®±«¹¸ ¿ ­»®·»­ ±º ¬¸®»» °«¾´·½ ©±®µ­¸±°­ ©·¬¸ °®±°»®¬§ ±©²»®­ô ³»®½¸¿²¬­ ¿²¼ ¿®»¿ ®»­·¼»²¬­ò ̸»·® ·­­«»­ô ½±³³»²¬­ ¿²¼ ª·­·±²­ ¸¿ª» ¸»´° ¬± ­¸¿°» ¬¸·­ ¼±½«³»²¬ò ߬ ¬¸» º·®­¬ ©±®µ­¸±°ô ¿¬¬»²¼»»­ ©»®» ¿­µ»¼ º±® ¬¸»·® ½±²½»®²­ô ¸±°»­ ¿²¼ ª·­·±²­ º±® ©¸¿¬ Ͳ·¼»®ñØ·´´½®»­¬ ½±«´¼ ¾»½±³»ò ß ª¿®·»¬§ ±º ½±²½»°¬­ ¿¼¼®»­­·²¹ ¬¸±­» ·­­«»­ ¿²¼ ±°°±®¬«²·¬·»­? ©»®» °®»­»²¬»¼ ·² ¬¸» ­»½±²¼ ®±«²¼ ±º ©±®µ­¸±°­ò ̸»§ ©»®» ¬¸»² ²¿®®±©»¼ ¬± ¬¸» °¿®¬·½«´¿® ª·­·±² ¿²¼ ­¬®¿¬»¹§ »³¾±¼·»¼ ·² ¬¸·­ °´¿² ¿­ ¿ ®»­«´¬ ±º ¬¸¿¬ º»»¼¾¿½µô ¿²¼ ¼·­½«­­»¼ ¿¬ ¬¸» ¬¸·®¼ ©±®µ­¸±°ò Í«¾­»¯«»²¬´§ô ¿ ½±³³«²·¬§ó©·¼» ³»»¬·²¹ ©¿­ ¸»´¼ ©¸»®» ¬¸» °®±°±­»¼ ª·­·±² ¿²¼ °´¿²­ ©»®» ¼·­½«­­»¼ò ÉØßÌ ÉÛ ØßÊÛ ØÛßÎÜ Í¬¿µ»¸±´¼»®­ ©»®» ½±²½»®²»¼ ¿¾±«¬ ¬¸®»» µ»§ ¬¸·²¹­ ? °¿®µ·²¹ô ¬®¿ºº·½ ½±²¹»­¬·±² ¿²¼ ¬¸» ¿®»¿?­ ·³¿¹» ¿²¼ ½¸¿®¿½¬»® ׳¿¹» ¿²¼ ݸ¿®¿½¬»®ò л±°´» ¬®«´§ ´±ª» ¬¸» Ó±³ ú б°? ­¸±°­ô ¿²¼ ¬¸¿¬ ·­ ±²» ±º ¬¸» µ»§ ¿¬¬®¿½¬·±²­ò ر©»ª»®ô ¬¸»®» ·­ ¿ ¼»­·®» º±® ¹®»»² ­°¿½» ·² ¬¸» °´¿¦¿ ¿²¼ ¿ ¾»¬¬»® ©¿´µ·²¹ »²ª·®±²³»²¬ô ©·¬¸ ­¸¿¼»ô ­»¿¬·²¹ ¿²¼ ½±²¬·²«±«­ ®»¬¿·´ º®±²¬¿¹» ¿¹¿·²­¬ ¬¸» ­·¼»©¿´µ­ò Ѳ» °»®­±² ¼»­½®·¾»¼ ¬¸» ½«®®»²¬ »¨°»®·»²½» ¿­ ´·µ» ©¿´µ·²¹ ·² ¿ °¿®µ·²¹ ´±¬?ò ̸»®» ·­ ¿´­± ¿ ¼»­·®» ¬± ¸¿ª» ¿ ½±¸»­·ª» ·¼»²¬·¬§ ¿²¼ ½¸¿®¿½¬»®ô §»¬ °®»­»®ª» ¬¸» ®·½¸²»­­ô »½´»½¬·½ ½¸¿®¿½¬»® ¿²¼ «²·¯«»²»­­ ±º ¾«·´¼·²¹­ ¬¸¿¬ ®»­«´¬­ º®±³ ³«´¬·°´» ±©²»®­¸·°­ò ̸·­ ·­ ³«½¸ ´·µ» ¬¸» ½±²¼·¬·±² ¬¸¿¬ ±½½«®­ ·² ¸·­¬±®·½ ª·´´¿¹» ½»²¬»®­ ¿²¼ ¼±©²¬±©²­ô ©¸»®» ¬¸»®» ·­ ¿ ¼·ª»®­·¬§ ±º ¿®½¸·¬»½¬«®¿´ ½¸¿®¿½¬»® ®»­«´¬·²¹ º®±³ ¼·ºº»®»²¬ ¿®½¸·¬»½¬­ ¿²¼ °»®·±¼­ ±º ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ò Ó»®½¸¿²¬­ ©¿²¬ ¿² ·³°®±ª»¼ ·¼»²¬·¬§ º®±³ Ø·´´½®»­¬ ¿²¼ ­«®®±«²¼·²¹ ¬¸±®±«¹¸º¿®»­ò Ó¿²§ °»±°´» ¼®·ª» ¼±©² Ø·´´½®»­¬ ±® ¿½®±­­ Ô±ª»®­ Ô¿²» ¿²¼ ¿®» ²±¬ »²¬·½»¼ ¬± »²¬»® ¬¸» ½»²¬»®ô ¿²¼ ¿­ ¿ ®»­«´¬ô ³¿²§ °¿­­»®­ó¾§ ¿®» ²±¬ ¿©¿®» ±º ¬¸» ½¸±·½» ±º ­¬±®»­ ¿²¼ ®»­¬¿«®¿²¬­ ¬¸¿¬ ½±³°®·­» Ͳ·¼»® д¿¦¿ò Ì®¿ºº·½ ¿²¼ ݱ²¹»­¬·±²ò ̸» Ü¿²·»´óØ·´´½®»­¬ ·²¬»®­»½¬·±² ·­ ±º¬»² ½±²¹»­¬»¼ ©·¬¸ ¬«®²·²¹ ³±ª»³»²¬­ ¬± ¾±¬¸ Ͳ·¼»® д¿¦¿ ¿²¼ ÍÓËò ̸·­ ·­ »¨¿½»®¾¿¬»¼ ¾§ ¬¸» º¿½¬ ¬¸¿¬ Ø·´´½®»­¬ ¬®¿ª»´ ´¿²»­ ¼± ²±¬ ´·²» «°ô ½¿«­·²¹ ½±²º«­·±² ¬± ¼®·ª»®­ò Í·²½» ¬¸» ³¿¶±®·¬§ ±º °¿®µ·²¹ º±® Ͳ·¼»® ·­ ´±½¿¬»¼ ¿´±²¹ ¿ ­·²¹´» ½·®½«´¿¬·²¹ ¼®·ª»ó´¿²» ¿®±«²¼ ¬¸» ½»²¬»® ±º ¬¸» °´¿¦¿ô ª·­·¬±®­ º®»¯«»²¬´§ ­·³°´§ ­¬±° ¿²¼ ©¿·¬ º±® ¿ °»¼»­¬®·¿² ¬± ¹»¬ ·²¬± ¬¸»·® ½¿® ¿²¼ ª¿½¿¬» ¿ ­°¿½»ò ̸·­ô ·² ½±²¶«²½¬·±² ©·¬¸ ¸¿ª·²¹ ½´±­»¼ α­»¼¿´» ¬± ¬¸®±«¹¸ ¬®¿ºº·½ô ½¿«­»­ ½¿®­ ¬± ­¬¿½µ «° ©·¬¸±«¬ ¿²§ ¿¾·´·¬§ ¬± ¿ª±·¼ ¬¸» ½±²¹»­¬·±²ò ײ ¿¼¼·¬·±²ô ­»ª»®¿´ ²»·¹¸¾±®¸±±¼ ®»­·¼»²¬­ ©¸± ´·ª» »¿­¬ ±º Ͳ·¼»® ½±³³»²¬»¼ ±² ¬¸» º¿½¬ ¬¸¿¬ »ª»² ¬¸±«¹¸ ¬¸»§ ´·ª» ©·¬¸·² ©¿´µ·²¹ ¼·­¬¿²½» ±º ¬¸» д¿¦¿ô ¬¸»§ °®»º»® ¬± ¼®·ª» ¾»½¿«­» ±º ¬¸» ¼¿²¹»® ·²ª±´ª»¼ ©·¬¸ ½®±­­·²¹ Ø·´´½®»­¬ ±² º±±¬ò п®µ·²¹ò ̸»®» ·­ ¿² ±ª»®¿´´ ´¿½µ ±º °¿®µ·²¹ º±® ¬¸» д¿¦¿ò ɸ»² Ͳ·¼»® д¿¦¿ ©¿­ ½®»¿¬»¼ ·² ¬¸» ïçíð­ô ®»¬¿·´ ´±¬­ ©»®» ­±´¼ ¾¿­»¼ ±² °¿®µ·²¹ ¾»·²¹ °®±ª·¼»¼ ±²ó­¬®»»¬ ·² ¬¸» ½»²¬»® ±º ¬¸» °´¿¦¿ò ̸·­ î Í ² × ¼ » ® ñ Ø × ´ ´ ½ ® » ­ ¬ Í ¬ ® ¿ ¬ » ¹ × ½ Ð ´ ¿ ² ©±®µ»¼ ©»´´ ¾»½¿«­» ¿¬ ¬¸¿¬ ¬·³»ô ¿ ¬§°·½¿´ ¸±«­»¸±´¼ ³¿§ ¸¿ª» ¸¿¼ ±²´§ ±²» ½¿®ò Ò±©ô ¿´³±­¬ »ª»®§ º¿³·´§ ³»³¾»® ±º ¼®·ª·²¹ ¿¹» ¸¿­ ¿ ª»¸·½´»ô ´»¿¼·²¹ ¬± ¿² «²¿²¬·½·°¿¬»¼ »­½¿´¿¬·±² ·² ¬¸» ²»»¼ º±® °¿®µ·²¹ ­°¿½»­ò É·¬¸ ¬¸» ­¸±®¬¿¹» ±º °¿®µ·²¹ô »³°´±§»»­ ¿®» ¬¿µ·²¹ «° °®·³» ­°¿½»­ ·² º®±²¬ ±º ­¬±®»­ ¿²¼ ®»­¬¿«®¿²¬­ô º±®½·²¹ °¿¬®±²­ ¬± ½·®½«´¿¬» ´±±µ·²¹ º±® »³°¬§ ­°¿½»­ ±º¬»² ¿¬ ­±³» ¼·­¬¿²½» º®±³ ¬¸»·® ¼»­¬·²¿¬·±²ò ̸»®» ·­ ¿ î󸱫® °¿®µ·²¹ ´·³·¬ ·² ¬¸» °´¿¦¿ô ¾«¬ °¿®µ·²¹ »²º±®½»³»²¬ ·­ ·²»ºº»½¬·ª» ¾»½¿«­» ¬¸»®» ·­ ª·®¬«¿´´§ ²± °´¿½» º±® ¬¸» ´±²¹ ¬»®³ °¿®µ»®­ ­«½¸ ¿­ »³°´±§»»­ ¬± ³±ª» ¬±ò ̸·­ °¿®µ·²¹ ­¸±®¬¿¹» ¸¿­ ½¿«­»¼ ½¿®­ ¬± ¾» °¿®µ»¼ ±² ²»·¹¸¾±®·²¹ ®»­·¼»²¬·¿´ ­¬®»»¬­ô ½®»¿¬·²¹ ·²½±²ª»²·»²½» º±® ®»­·¼»²¬­ò ׬ ¸¿­ ¿´­± ®»­«´¬»¼ ·² ­¬«²¬·²¹ ¬¸» ¹®±©¬¸ ¿²¼ ª·¬¿´·¬§ ±º ¾«­·²»­­»­ ·² Ͳ·¼»® д¿¦¿ ¾»½¿«­» °®±­°»½¬·ª» ½«­¬±³»®­ ­·³°´§ ¼®·ª» ¬± ±¬¸»® ½»²¬»®­ ©¸»®» ¬¸»§ ½¿² ¹»¬ ·² ¿²¼ ±«¬ ³±®» ½±²ª»²·»²¬´§ò ß²±¬¸»® ½´»¿® ³»­­¿¹» º®±³ ¿®»¿ ®»­·¼»²¬­ ©¿­ Ü±²?¬ ¿½¯«·®» ´¿²¼ º±® °¿®µ·²¹ ±«¬­·¼» ¬¸» ½±³³»®½·¿´ ¿®»¿?ò ̸·­ ®»°±®¬ ­»¬­ ±«¬ ¾±¬¸ ­¸±®¬ ¿²¼ ´±²¹ ¬»®³ ­¬®¿¬»¹·»­ ¬± ¿¼¼®»­­ ¿²¼ ®»­±´ª» ½¸®±²·½ ·­­«»­ ±º °¿®µ·²¹ô ½±²¹»­¬·±² ¿²¼ ·²¿°°®±°®·¿¬» ®»¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ô ©¸·´» »²½±«®¿¹·²¹ ¿² ¿¬¬®¿½¬·ª» °»¼»­¬®·¿²ó ±®·»²¬»¼ ½»²¬»® º±® ¬¸» Ý·¬§ò ß Ê·­·±² º±® Ͳ·¼»® ñ Ø·´´½®»­¬ ̱ ³¿µ» Ͳ·¼»®ñØ·´´½®»­¬ ¿ ¹®»¿¬»® Ê·´´¿¹» Ý»²¬»®? º±® ˲·ª»®­·¬§ п®µ ¾§ ½®»¿¬·²¹ ¿ °´¿½» ©¸»®» °»±°´» ©¿²¬ ¬± ­°»²¼ ¬·³» ¾§ ³¿µ·²¹ ·¬ ¿ ¹®»¿¬ °´¿½» ¬± ©¿´µô ¾§ ¾«·´¼·²¹ ±² ·¬­ º®·»²¼´·²»­­ ¿²¼ ³±³ ¿²¼ °±°? ­¬±®»­ ¿²¼ ®»­¬¿«®¿²¬­ô ¿²¼ ¾§ ­±´ª·²¹ ¬¸» °¿®µ·²¹ °®±¾´»³ ±ª»® ¬¸» ´±²¹ ¬»®³ò í Í ² × ¼ » ® ñ Ø × ´ ´ ½ ® » ­ ¬ Í ¬ ® ¿ ¬ » ¹ × ½ Ð ´ ¿ ² ×ÓßÙÛ ßÒÜ ×ÜÛÒÌ×ÌÇ Í× ËÓÓßÎÇ ÑÚ ÍÍËÛÍ Í²·¼»® д¿¦¿ ¸¿­ ©¸¿¬ «®¾¿² ¼»­·¹²»®­ ½¿´´ ¹±±¼ ¾±²»­??¿² ¿°°»¿´·²¹ ³·¨¬«®» ±º »¨·­¬·²¹ ½¸¿®¿½¬»®·­¬·½­ ¬¸¿¬ ½¿² ¾» ¾«·´¬ «°±² ¬± »²¸¿²½» ·¬­ ­¬®»²¹¬¸­ ©¸·´» ¿¼¼®»­­·²¹ ­±³» ±º ·¬­ ­¸±®¬º¿´´­ ¿²¼ »ª±´ª·²¹ ²»»¼­ò Ó«½¸ ³±®» ¬¸¿² ¿ ­¸±°°·²¹ ½»²¬»®ô? Ͳ·¼»® д¿¦¿ ·­ ½±³°®·­»¼ ±º ®»¿´ ­¬®»»¬­ô ­¬®»»¬ ½±®²»®­ô ­·¼»©¿´µ­ ¿²¼ ¿´´»§©¿§­ò ׬ ¸¿­ ¿² ¿°°»¿´·²¹ ³·¨ ±º ¾«·´¼·²¹ ¿²¼ ­·¹²¿¹» ¬§°»­ò ̸» ½»²¬®¿´ º±«²¬¿·² ·­ ¿ ²»·¹¸¾±®¸±±¼ ´¿²¼³¿®µò ׬ ¸¿­ ¿ °¿¬·²¿ ¿²¼ º»»´·²¹ ±º ½±³º±®¬ ¬¸¿¬ ½±³» ©·¬¸ ¿¹»ô ©¸·½¸ ±²» ©±®µ­¸±° ¿¬¬»²¼»» ¼»­½®·¾»¼ ¿­ ¿ ´·¬¬´» ±º ©¸¿¬?­ ´»º¬ ±º Ñ´¼ Ü¿´´¿­ò? ̸»­» »´»³»²¬­ ´»²¼ ¬¸» д¿¦¿ ©¸¿¬ ½¿²²±¬ »¿­·´§ ¾» ®»°´·½¿¬»¼ ·² ²»© ´·º»­¬§´» ½»²¬»®­?¿ ­»²­» ±º ¿«¬¸»²¬·½·¬§ò ̸·­ ¯«¿´·¬§ô ­¬¿µ»¸±´¼»®­ ­¿·¼ô ³«­¬ ¾» ®»½±¹²·¦»¼ ¿²¼ °®±¬»½¬»¼ ¿­ ·¼»¿­ º±® ·³°®±ª»³»²¬­ ¿®» ¿­­»­­»¼ò ̸®±«¹¸ ¬¸·­ ­¬¿µ»¸±´¼»® ·²°«¬ ¿²¼ »¨¬»²­·ª» ±²ó­·¬» ±¾­»®ª¿¬·±²ô ¬¸» º±´´±©·²¹ ·­­«»­ »³»®¹»¼ ¿­ µ»§ ·¼»¿­ ¬¸¿¬ ­¸±«´¼ ¹«·¼» ¬¸» ¿®»¿?­ »²¸¿²½»³»²¬æ Ó¿·²¬¿·² Ͳ·¼»® д¿¦¿ ¿­ ¿ ½±³³«²·¬§ ¼»­¬·²¿¬·±²ô ¿­ ±°°±­»¼ ¬± ¿ ½·¬§ó©·¼» ±® ®»¹·±²¿´ ¼»­¬·²¿¬·±²ò Ó¿·²¬¿·² Ͳ·¼»® д¿¦¿?­ »½´»½¬·½ ª·´´¿¹»? ½¸¿®¿½¬»®ò Ю±ª·¼» ³¿¨·³«³ ½±³º±®¬ ¿²¼ ­¿º»¬§ º±® ©¿´µ»®­ Ю±ª·¼» ¿ ½±²¬·²«·¬§ ±º ·³¿¹» º±® ¬¸» ½»²¬»®ô ¾«¬ ²±¬ °´¿½»´»­­ «²·º±®³·¬§ò Ø·¹¸´·¹¸¬ ¬¸» °®»­»²½» ±º ¬¸» °´¿¦¿ º®±³ ·¬­ »¼¹»­ ¿¬ Ø·´´½®»­¬ ¿²¼ Ô±ª»®­ô ¾«¬ ·² ¬¿­¬»º«´ô ­«¾¬´» º¿­¸·±² Î ÛÝÑÓÓÛÒÜßÌ×ÑÒÍ Í»ª»®¿´ ±º ¬¸» ·­­«»­ ¿¾±ª» ½¿² ¾» ¿¼¼®»­­»¼ ·² °¿®¬ ¬¸®±«¹¸ ¬¸» «­» ±º ¿ ®¿²¹» ±º ¼»­·¹² ¬®»¿¬³»²¬­ò ̸»­» »´»³»²¬­ ¿®» ®»´¿¬·ª»´§ ´±© ½±­¬ô ¿²¼ ½±«´¼ ¾» ·³°´»³»²¬»¼ ·² ¬¸» ­¸±®¬ ¬»®³ ©·¬¸±«¬ ½®»¿¬·²¹ «²¼«» ¸¿®¼­¸·°­ ±® »¨¬»²¼»¼ ·²¬»®®«°¬·±²­ ±º ¾«­·²»­­ ¿²¼ ¬®¿ºº·½ò ̸»­» ®»½±³³»²¼¿¬·±²­ ·²½´«¼»æ Ý®»¿¬» ¿ ­«¾¬´» º¿³·´§ ±º ­·¹²¿¹» ¬± ¸·¹¸´·¹¸¬ ¬¸» ½»²¬»®­ »²¬®¿²½»­ ¿²¼ »¼¹»­ô ¿²¼ ¬± ¼·®»½¬ °¿¬®±²­ ¬± °¿®µ·²¹ ¿²¼ µ»§ ¼»­¬·²¿¬·±²­ Ý®»¿¬» ¬¿­¬»º«´ ¹¿¬»©¿§­ ¿¬ ¬¸» °´¿¦¿?­ »²¬®¿²½»­ ±ºº Ô±ª»®?­ ¿²¼ Ø·´´½®»­¬ò ײ­¬¿´´ ­°»½·¿´ °¿ª·²¹?­°»½·º·½¿´´§ ¾®·½µô ½±²½®»¬» «²·¬ °¿ª»®­ ±® ­¬¿³°»¼ ½±²½®»¬»?¬± ¸·¹¸´·¹¸¬ µ»§ »²¬®¿²½»­ô ¿´´ ½®±­­©¿´µ­ ¿²¼ ¬¸» ½»²¬»® º±«²¬¿·² ¿®»¿ò ì Í ² × ¼ » ® ñ Ø × ´ ´ ½ ® » ­ ¬ Í ¬ ® ¿ ¬ » ¹ × ½ Ð ´ ¿ ² ײ­¬¿´´ ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ ­·¼»©¿´µ ¬®»»­ ¬± ¿½¸·»ª» ½±²­·­¬»²½§ ·² ­°»½·»­ ¿²¼ ­°¿½·²¹ò Í·¼»©¿´µ ¬®»»­ ­¸±«´¼ ¾» °´¿½»¼ ·² ©»´´­ ¼·®»½¬´§ ¾»¸·²¼ ¬¸» ½«®¾ô ¾»¬©»»² ¬¸» °»¼»­¬®·¿² ©¿´µ©¿§ ¿²¼ ±²ó ­¬®»»¬ °¿®µ·²¹ò ß½¸·»ª» ½±²­·­¬»²½§ ·² º«®²·­¸·²¹­?±®²¿³»²¬¿´ ´·¹¸¬·²¹ô ¾»²½¸»­ô ©¿­¬» ®»½»°¬¿½´»­ ¿²¼ ­·¹²°±­¬­?¬± ´»²¼ ¿ ³»¿­«®» ±º «²·º±®³·¬§ ¬± ¬¸» °«¾´·½ ®»¿´³ò Û¨°¿²¼ «­» ±º ­»¿­±²¿´ ½±´±® °´¿²¬·²¹­ ·² ¬¸» °´¿¦¿ò Ю±¶»½¬ Û¨¿³°´»­æ Ó·´¬±² Ù¿¬»©¿§ò ̸» º±´´±©·²¹ ·³¿¹»­ ·´´«­¬®¿¬» ¸±© ½±³¾·²¿¬·±²­ ±º ¬¸»­» ±¾¶»½¬·ª»­ ³·¹¸¬ ¾» ¿½¸·»ª»¼ ¬¸®±«¹¸ ­°»½·º·½ »²¸¿²½»³»²¬ °®±¶»½¬­ò Ú±® »¨¿³°´»ô ·² ¬¸» ·³¿¹» ¾»´±©ô °´¿¦¿ ·¼»²¬·¬§ ·­ ¸·¹¸´·¹¸¬»¼ º®±³ Ø·´´½®»­¬ α¿¼ ¬¸®±«¹¸ ¬¸» ½®»¿¬·±² ±º ¿ ¹¿¬»©¿§ »²¬®¿²½» ±² ¬¸» ½±®²»® ¿¬ ¬¸» ·²¬»®­»½¬·±² ±º Ø·´´½®»­¬ ¿²¼ Ó·´¬±²ò ß ¹¿¬»©¿§ ¿®½¸ ±º ¿®½¸·¬»½¬«®¿´ ³»¬¿´ ­°¿²­ Ó·´¬±² ͬ®»»¬ô º®¿³·²¹ ¬¸» ½·®½«´¿® º±«²¬¿·² ¿¬ ¬¸» ¸»¿®¬ ±º ¬¸» °´¿¦¿ô ¿²¼ ·­ ­«°°±®¬»¼ ¾§ ½±³°´»³»²¬¿®§ °»¼»­¬®·¿² ¹¿¬»©¿§ ­¬®«½¬«®»­ ±ª»® ¬¸» ­·¼»©¿´µò ̱ ½±³°´»³»²¬ ¬¸» ¹¿¬»©¿§ ¿²¼ ³·²·³·¦» ª·­«¿´ ½´«¬¬»®ô ¬®¿ºº·½ ­·¹²¿´ ´·¹¸¬­ ¿®» °´¿½»¼ ±² ª»®¬·½¿´ °±´»­ò ̸» ¼»­·¹² ©±«´¼ ·²½±®°±®¿¬» ­«¾¬´» ¾¿¼¹·²¹ô? ­³¿´´ ½·®½«´¿® ­·¹²­ ®»¿¼·²¹ Í²·¼»® д¿¦¿? ·² ¿ ½´¿­­·½ ­»®·º º±²¬ô ©¸·½¸ Ù¿¬»©¿§ Û²¬®¿²½» ݱ²½»°¬ º±® Ó·´¬±² ͬ®»»¬ ¿¬ Ø·´´½®»­¬ ë Í ² × ¼ » ® ñ Ø × ´ ´ ½ ® » ­ ¬ Í ¬ ® ¿ ¬ » ¹ × ½ Ð ´ ¿ ² ©±«´¼ ¾» ®»°»¿¬»¼ ¿¬ ±¬¸»® »²¬®¿²½»­ ¿²¼ ¿¬ »¿½¸ ­¬®»»¬ ½±®²»® ±º ¬¸» °´¿¦¿ò л¼»­¬®·¿² ¾«´¾±«¬­? ©±«´¼ °®±ª·¼» »¨¬®¿ ½±®²»® ¯«»«·²¹ ­°¿½» º±® ©¿´µ»®­ò Í°»½·¿´ °¿ª·²¹ ©±«´¼ ¸·¹¸´·¹¸¬ ¬¸» ª·­·¾·´·¬§ ±º ½®±­­©¿´µ­ô ½®»¿¬» ¿ ©»´½±³» ³¿¬? ¿½®±­­ ¬¸» ­¬®»»¬ ¿¬ ¬¸» °´¿¦¿ »²¬®¿²½»ô ¿²¼ ´»²¼ ¿ ³»¿­«®» ±º ¼»­·¹² ½±²¬·²«·¬§ ½±²­·­¬»²¬ ©·¬¸ ¬¸» °´¿¦¿?­ ½¸¿®¿½¬»®ò Ô±ª»®?­ Ù¿¬»©¿§ò ß ¹¿¬»©¿§ »²¬®¿²½» ·²¬± ¬¸» °´¿¦¿ º®±³ Ô±ª»®?­ Ô¿²» ©±«´¼ ¿¼¼®»­­ ¬¸» ­¿³» ¹±¿´­ ¿²¼ «­» ­±³» ±º ¬¸» ­¿³» »´»³»²¬­ô ¾«¬ ©±«´¼ ³±®» ½´±­»´§ ®»º´»½¬ ¬¸» ½±²¬»¨¬ ¿²¼ ½¸¿®¿½¬»® ±º ¬¸¿¬ ·²¬»®­»½¬·±²ò ײ ¬¸» ½±²½»°¬ ·´´«­¬®¿¬»¼ô ´·³»­¬±²» ½±´«³²­ »½¸±·²¹ ¬¸» »¨·­¬·²¹ ´·³»­¬±²» ©¿´´­ ©±«´¼ ­«°°±®¬ ±®²¿³»²¬¿´ ´·¹¸¬·²¹ ¿²¼ ¿®½¸·¬»½¬«®¿´ ³»¬¿´©±®µ ¬± ½®»¿¬» ¿ ­»²­» ±º ¿®®·ª¿´ ¿¬ ¬¸» ·²¬»®­»½¬·±²ò ̸» ®±«²¼ ¾¿¼¹·²¹? ¿²²±«²½·²¹ Ͳ·¼»® д¿¦¿ ©±«´¼ ¾» ³±«²¬»¼ ¬± ¬¸» ½±´«³²­ò Ô·µ» ¬¸» Ó·´¬±² Ù¿¬»©¿§ô ­°»½·¿´ °¿ª·²¹ ©±«´¼ ¸·¹¸´·¹¸¬ ¬¸» °»¼»­¬®·¿² ½®±­­©¿´µ ©¸·´» ½®»¿¬·²¹ ¿ ©»´½±³» ³¿¬? ¿½®±­­ ¬¸» ­¬®»»¬ò д¿²¬·²¹­ ±º ­»¿­±²¿´ º´±©»®­ ©±«´¼ ¿¼¼ ¿ ­°´¿­¸ ±º ½±´±® ¿¬ ¬¸» »²¬®¿²½»ò Ù¿¬»©¿§ Û²¬®¿²½» ݱ²½»°¬ º±® Û²¬®¿²½» ¿¬ Ô±ª»®?­ Ô¿²» ê Í ² × ¼ » ® ñ Ø × ´ ´ ½ ® » ­ ¬ Í ¬ ® ¿ ¬ » ¹ × ½ Ð ´ ¿ ² д¿¦¿ ݱ®²»®­ò ̸» °´¿¦¿ ½±®²»®­ ­¸±«´¼ ¾» ­«¾¬´§ »²¸¿²½»¼ ©·¬¸ ­±³» ±º ¬¸» °®»ª·±«­´§ ¼»­½®·¾»¼ »´»³»²¬­ ¬± ¿·¼ ·² ½±²ª»§·²¹ ¿ ½±²­·­¬»²¬ ·³¿¹» º±® ¬¸» °´¿¦¿ º®±³ ­«®®±«²¼·²¹ ­¬®»»¬­ò ײ ¬¸·­ »¨¿³°´»ô ¿¬ ¬¸» ½±®²»® ±º Ô±ª»®?­ ¿²¼ Ø·´´½®»­¬ô ­°»½·¿´ °¿ª·²¹ ²±¬ ±²´§ ¸·¹¸´·¹¸¬­ ¬¸» ½®±­­©¿´µ­ô ¾«¬ ª·­«¿´´§ ¬·»­ ¬¸·­ ½±®²»® ¬± ¬¸» ®»­¬ ±º ¬¸» °´¿¦¿ ©¸»®» ¬¸» ­¿³» ¬®»¿¬³»²¬ ·­ «­»¼ò ̸» ®±«²¼ ¾¿¼¹·²¹? ·­ ¿¬¬¿½¸»¼ ¬± ¬¸» ¬®¿ºº·½ ­·¹²¿´ ¿®³ ø±® ½±«´¼ ¾» ³±«²¬»¼ ±² ¿ º®»»­¬¿²¼·²¹ °±´»÷ò ݱ®²»® °´¿²¬·²¹­ô ©¸·½¸ ³¿§ ·²½´«¼» ­»¿­±²¿´ ½±´±®ô ¸·²¬ ¿¬ ¬¸» ®·½¸ ´¿²¼­½¿°·²¹ ·² ¬¸» °´¿¦¿?­ ·²¬»®·±®ô ©¸·´» ½±²­·­¬»²¬´§ ­°¿½»¼ ­¬®»»¬ ¬®»»­ ­±º¬»² ¬¸» ­¬®»»¬ »¼¹» ¿²¼ °®±ª·¼» ­¸¿¼» º±® ©¿´µ»®­ò д¿¦¿ ݱ®²»® ݱ²½»°¬ é Í ² × ¼ » ® ñ Ø × ´ ´ ½ ® » ­ ¬ Í ¬ ® ¿ ¬ » ¹ × ½ Ð ´ ¿ ² д¿¦¿ ͬ®»»¬­½¿°»ò ̸» µ»§ ¬± ½®»¿¬·²¹ ¿ °»¼»­¬®·¿²ó±®·»²¬»¼ ¼·­¬®·½¬ ·­ ³¿µ·²¹ ¬¸» ­·¼»©¿´µ­ ­¸¿¼»¼ ¿²¼ ·²¬»®»­¬·²¹ò λ­»¿®½¸ ¸¿­ ¼»³±²­¬®¿¬»¼ ¬¸¿¬ ­¸¿¼·²¹ °¿ª»¼ ¿®»¿­ ½¿² ´±©»® ¬¸» ¿³¾·»²¬ ¬»³°»®¿¬«®» ¾§ éóïï ¼»¹®»»­ò Ì®»»­ô °»¼»­¬®·¿² ´»ª»´ ´·¹¸¬·²¹ô ­¬®»»¬ º«®²·¬«®» ¿²¼ °´¿²¬»®­ ½¿² ¸»´° ³¿µ» ­¬®±´´·²¹ ¬¸» °´¿¦¿ ¿² »²¶±§¿¾´» »¨°»®·»²½»ò Ì®»»­ ­¸±«´¼ ¾» °´¿²¬»¼ «­·²¹ ¬®»»ó¹®¿¬»­ ¬± ³¿¨·³·¦» ¬¸» «­¿¾´» ­·¼»©¿´µò д¿¦¿ ͬ®»»¬­½¿°» ݱ²½»°¬ è Í ² × ¼ » ® ñ Ø × ´ ´ ½ ® » ­ ¬ Í ¬ ® ¿ ¬ » ¹ × ½ Ð ´ ¿ ² Ý×ÎÝËÔßÌ×ÑÒ ßÒÜ ÎÑßÜÉßÇÍ Í× ËÓÓßÎÇ ÑÚ ÍÍËÛÍ Í±³» ±º ¬¸» °®±¾´»³­ °´¿¹«·²¹ Ͳ·¼»®ñØ·´´½®»­¬ ·²½´«¼»? п®µ»®­ ·² ¬¸» д¿¦¿ ¹»¬¬·²¹ ½¿«¹¸¬ ·² ½±²¹»­¬·±² ø¿´³±­¬ ¿´´ °¿®µ·²¹ ­°¿½»­ ·² Ͳ·¼»® ¿®» ¿½½»­­»¼ ¾§ ±²» ½·®½«´¿¬·±² ´¿²»÷ Ü¿²¹»®±«­ ½±²¼·¬·±²­ º±® °»¼»­¬®·¿²­ ©¸± ½®±­­ Ø·´´½®»­¬ ݱ²¹»­¬·±² ±º ¬¸» Ü¿²·»´óØ·´´½®»­¬ ײ¬»®­»½¬·±² ß ¬±±ó©·¼» ¿²¼ «²¼»º·²»¼ Ø·´´½®»­¬ô ­±«¬¸ ±º Ü¿²·»´ ÓØÙÞ ßÕ×ÒÙ×ÔÔÝÎÛÍÌ ß ÎßÒÜÑËÔÛÊßÎÜ Ø·´´½®»­¬ Ò±®¬¸ ±º Ü¿²·»´ Ø·´´½®»­¬ ²±®¬¸ ±º Ü¿²·»´ ·­ ½«®®»²¬´§ ½±³°®·­»¼ ±º º±«® ¬®¿ª»´ ´¿²»­ ¿²¼ ¿²¹´»¼ °¿®µ·²¹ ±² ¬¸» ©»­¬ ­·¼» ¿¼¶¿½»²¬ ¬± ¬¸» ®»¬¿·´ò ׬ ·­ ²±¬ ¿ °¿®¬·½«´¿®´§ ¿¬¬®¿½¬·ª» ½±®®·¼±®ô ¿²¼ ¿¼¶±·²·²¹ ²»·¹¸¾±®¸±±¼ ®»­·¼»²¬­ ¸¿ª» ½±³°´¿·²»¼ ¿¾±«¬ ¬¸» ¼¿²¹»®­ ±º ½®±­­·²¹ Ø·´´½®»­¬ ±² º±±¬ ? ¬¸»§ ¹»¬ ·² ¬¸»·® ½¿®­ ¿²¼ ¼®·ª» ¬± Ͳ·¼»® д¿¦¿ ·²­¬»¿¼ò ̸» ®·¹¸¬ó±ºó©¿§ ·­ ª»®§ ´·³·¬»¼ ±² ¬¸·­ ­»¹³»²¬ ±º Ø·´´½®»­¬ ©¸·½¸ ´·³·¬­ ¬¸» º´»¨·¾·´·¬§ ¬± ½®»¿¬» ¿² ¿¬¬®¿½¬·ª» ¾±«´»ª¿®¼ ±® ¬± ¾«ºº»® ³¿²»«ª»®·²¹ ±º ¿²¹´»¼ó°¿®µ»®­ò ׬ ·­ ¬¸»®»º±®» ®»½±³³»²¼»¼ ¬± µ»»° ¬¸» »¨·­¬·²¹ ½®±­­ó­»½¬·±² ¾«¬ »²¸¿²½» ·¬ ©·¬¸ ­¬®»»¬ ¬®»»­ ±² ¾±¬¸ ­·¼»­ ±º Ø·´´½®»­¬ô ¿²¼ ¬± ç Í ² × ¼ » ® ñ Ø × ´ ´ ½ ® » ­ ¬ Í ¬ ® ¿ ¬ » ¹ × ½ Ð ´ ¿ ² ½±±®¼·²¿¬» ­·¹²¿´·¦¿¬·±² ¿¬ Ó·´¬±² ¿²¼ °®±ª·¼» »²¸¿²½»¼ °»¼»­¬®·¿² ½®±­­·²¹­ ¿¬ α­»¼¿´»ô ο²µ·² ¿²¼ É»­¬³·²­¬»®ò ̸» °»¼»­¬®·¿² ¿®»¿ ·­ ª»®§ ²¿®®±© ±² ¬¸» Ͳ·¼»® ­·¼» ±º Ø·´´½®»­¬ô ¾«¬ ¬¸»®» ·­ ¿² ±°°±®¬«²·¬§ ¬± «¬·´·¦» ¬¸» ¬®·¿²¹«´¿® ­°¿½» ¿¬ ¬¸» ¸»¿¼ ±º ¿²¹´»¼ °¿®µ·²¹ ¬± °´¿²¬ ­¬®»»¬ ¬®»»­ ©·¬¸±«¬ ·³°·²¹·²¹ ±² °»¼»­¬®·¿² º´±©ò øß ¹±±¼ »¨¿³°´» ±º ¬¸·­ ±½½«®­ ¿¬ Ý«´©»´´ Ó»²?­ ͬ±®» ¶«­¬ ­±«¬¸ ±º Ó½Ú¿®´·² Þ´ª¼ò ±² Ø·´´½®»­¬ò÷ ̸·­ ©±«´¼ °®»­»®ª» ¬¸» °¿®µ·²¹ ­°¿½»­ ©¸·½¸ ¿®» ²»»¼»¼ º±® ®»¬¿·´ ¿½¬·ª·¬§ ©¸·´» ¹®»¿¬´§ »²¸¿²½·²¹ ¬¸» °»¼»­¬®·¿² »²ª·®±²³»²¬ ¿²¼ ­¬®»»¬­½¿°»ò ËÔóÑÐÍ Ì×Ô×ÆÛÛÚÌÊÛÎ ßÎÕ×ÒÙ ÐßÝÛ ßÍÌ ÎÛß ÚÑÎ ÌÎÛÛÌ ÎÛÛÍ Ø·´´½®»­¬ Ò±®¬¸ ±º Ü¿²·»´æ λ½±³³»²¼»¼ ïð Í ² × ¼ » ® ñ Ø × ´ ´ ½ ® » ­ ¬ Í ¬ ® ¿ ¬ » ¹ × ½ Ð ´ ¿ ² Ø·´´½®»­¬ ͱ«¬¸ ±º Ü¿²·»´ ݸ¿­» Þ¿²µ ÍÓË Ý«´©»´´?­ ÍÓË Í±«¬¸ ±º Ü¿²·»´ô Ø·´´½®»­¬ ·­ »¨¬®¿±®¼·²¿®·´§ ©·¼» ©·¬¸ ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ «²¼»º·²»¼ ´¿²»­ ±² ¬¸» ©»­¬ ­·¼» ? »­°»½·¿´´§ ¾»¬©»»² Ü¿²·»´ ¿²¼ ­±«¬¸ ±º ˲·ª»®­·¬§ ߪ»ò ̸·­ ´»¿¼­ ¬± ­°»»¼·²¹ ¬®¿ºº·½ ¿²¼ ¼¿²¹»®±«­ ª»¸·½«´¿® ³±ª»³»²¬­ò Ý®±­­·²¹ ¬¸·­ ­¬®»»¬ ·­ ¼¿²¹»®±«­ º±® °»¼»­¬®·¿²­ò ׬ ·­ ¿´­± «²¿¬¬®¿½¬·ª» ¿´±²¹ ¬¸» ©»­¬ ­·¼»ô ©·¬¸ ±²´§ ¿ ­·³°´» ½«®¾ ¼»º·²·²¹ ®»¬¿·´ °¿®µ·²¹ º®±³ ¬¸±®±«¹¸º¿®»ò ïï Í ² × ¼ » ® ñ Ø × ´ ´ ½ ® » ­ ¬ Í ¬ ® ¿ ¬ » ¹ × ½ Ð ´ ¿ ² ̸»®» ·­ ¹®»¿¬»® º´»¨·¾·´·¬§ ©·¬¸ ®·¹¸¬ó±ºó©¿§ ­±«¬¸ ±º Ü¿²·»´ ¬¸¿² ¬¸»®» ·­ ²±®¬¸ò Ø·´´½®»­¬ ½¿² ¾» ½¸¿²²»´»¼ ¬± °®±ª·¼» ¿² ¿³°´» ìó´¿²» ¼·ª·¼»¼ ®±¿¼©¿§ ©·¬¸±«¬ ­¿½®·º·½·²¹ ½¿°¿½·¬§ò ß ¬®«´§ ¹®»¿¬ ¾±«´»ª¿®¼ ½¿² ¾» ½®»¿¬»¼ ¾»¬©»»² Ó±½µ·²¹¾·®¼ ¿²¼ Ü¿²·»´ ¾§ «¬·´·¦·²¹ ¿ ´¿²¼­½¿°»¼ ³»¼·¿² ¿²¼ ®»½´¿·³·²¹ ¬¸» ¬®·¿²¹«´¿® ¸»¿¼ ±º °¿®µ·²¹ ­°¿½»­ ­·³·´¿® ¬± ²±®¬¸ ±º Ü¿²·»´ò ̸·­ ½±«´¼ ¾» ¿ ³¿¶»­¬·½ »²¬®¿²½» ¬± ¾±¬¸ Ͳ·¼»®ñØ·´´½®»­¬ ¿²¼ ÍÓËò Ú±® ¿¼¼»¼ °»¼»­¬®·¿² ­¿º»¬§ô ½®±­­©¿´µ­ ­¸±«´¼ ¾» »²¸¿²½»¼ ©·¬¸ ­°»½·¿´ °¿ª·²¹ ¿²¼ °±­­·¾´§ ®«³¾´» ­¬®·°­ò ̸»­» ·³°®±ª»³»²¬­ô ©¸·´» ³¿µ·²¹ ¬¸» ¼®·ª» ¿² ¿¬¬®¿½¬·ª» ¿²¼ ³»³±®¿¾´» »¨°»®·»²½»ô ©·´´ ¸¿ª» ¬¸» »ºº»½¬ ±º ½¿´³·²¹ ¬®¿ºº·½ ­°»»¼­ ©·¬¸±«¬ ·²½®»¿­·²¹ ½±²¹»­¬·±²ò Ø·´´½®»­¬ ͱ«¬¸ ±º Ü¿²·»´æ λ½±³³»²¼»¼ ïî Í ² × ¼ » ® ñ Ø × ´ ´ ½ ® » ­ ¬ Í ¬ ® ¿ ¬ » ¹ × ½ Ð ´ ¿ ² ÐßÎÕ×ÒÙ Ð× ßÎÕ×ÒÙ ÍÍËÛÍ Ì¸» ´¿½µ ±º ¿ª¿·´¿¾·´·¬§ ±º °¿®µ·²¹ ·² Ͳ·¼»® д¿¦¿ ·­ ±²» ±º ¬¸» ³±­¬ ½±³³±² ½±³°´¿·²¬­ ¿¾±«¬ ¬¸» ½»²¬»®ò Ý«­¬±³»®­ ¸¿ª» ¿ ¼·ºº·½«´¬ ¬·³» º·²¼·²¹ °¿®µ·²¹ ­°¿½»­ô »­°»½·¿´´§ ¿®±«²¼ ´«²½¸ ¸±«® ¿²¼ »¿®´§ ¿º¬»®²±±²ò אַ±²­ ©¿·¬·²¹ º±® ¿ °¿®µ·²¹ ­°¿½» ¬± ¾»½±³» ¿ª¿·´¿¾´» ½¿«­» ¿ °»®°»¬«¿´ ¬®¿ºº·½ ¶¿³ ¿¬ ¬¸·­ ¬·³» ±º ¼¿§ò ß ½¿´½«´¿¬·±² ±º °¿®µ·²¹ ²»»¼ô ¾¿­»¼ ±² ¬¸» Ý·¬§?­ ®»¯«·®»¼ °¿®µ·²¹ ®¿¬·± ±º ï ­°¿½» °»® íðð ­¯«¿®» º»»¬ ±º ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ô ½±³°¿®»¼ ©·¬¸ ¬¸» ¿³±«²¬ ±º °¿®µ·²¹ °®±ª·¼»¼ ·² ¬¸» °´¿¦¿ô ·²¼·½¿¬»­ ¿² ¿°°®±¨·³¿¬»´§ ïêðó­°¿½» ¼»º·½·¬ò ̸±«¹¸ ¬¸·­ ®¿¬·± ·­ ¹»²»®¿´´§ ´±©»® ¬¸¿² ³±­¬ ®»¬¿·´ ¼·­¬®·½¬­ô ¬¸» º¿½¬ ¬¸¿¬ ª·®¬«¿´´§ ¿´´ °¿®µ·²¹ ­°¿½»­ ¿®» ­¸¿®»¼ ¿²¼ ¿ª¿·´¿¾´» º±® ¿´´ ½«­¬±³»®­ °®±ª·¼»­ ¿ ³«½¸ ¸·¹¸»® »ºº·½·»²½§ ±º «­» ¬¸¿² ·º ¼»¼·½¿¬»¼ ¬± »¿½¸ ·²¼·ª·¼«¿´ ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ò ̸» ³¿·² °®±¾´»³ ¬¸¿¬ »¨¿½»®¾¿¬»­ ¬¸·­ ½±²¼·¬·±² ·­ ¬¸¿¬ ³¿²§ »³°´±§»»­ ©¸± ¿®®·ª» ·² ¬¸» ³±®²·²¹ º±® ©±®µô ¬¿µ» ¬¸» ³±­¬ ½±²ª»²·»²¬ ­°¿½»­ ¿²¼ ¬·» ¬¸»³ «° ¿´´ ¼¿§ò ײ ¿¼¼·¬·±²ô ±¬¸»® »³°´±§»»­ ¿²¼ ­±³» °¿¬®±²­ô °¿®µ ·² ¿¼¶±·²·²¹ ²»·¹¸¾±®¸±±¼­ò ̸·­ ´»ª»´ ±º °¿®µ·²¹ ½±²¹»­¬·±² ·­ ¿ ³¿¶±® °®±¾´»³ º±® ¿®»¿ ®»­·¼»²¬­ ¿²¼ º±® ¾«­·²»­­»­ô »­°»½·¿´´§ ¬¸±­» ¬¸¿¬ ®»´§ ±² ¿ ¯«·½µ ¬«®²ó±ª»® ±º °¿®µ·²¹ ­°¿½»­ ­«½¸ ¿­ ½±ºº»» ­¸±°­ô ¼®§ ½´»¿²»®­ ¿²¼ ±¬¸»®­ ¬¸¿¬ ­»´´ ­«²¼®§ ·¬»³­ò Ñ Ð ßÎÕ×ÒÙ ÐÌ×ÑÒÍ Ì¸»®» ¿®» ¾±¬¸ ²»¿®ó¬»®³ ¿²¼ ´±²¹ó¬»®³ ­¬®¿¬»¹·»­ º±® Û­¬·³¿¬» ±º Ò»¿®ó»®³ п®µ·² ̹ ¾«·´¼·²¹ «° ¿ ­«°°´§ ±º ½±²ª»²·»²¬ °¿®µ·²¹ ­°¿½»­ò ̸» µ»§ ·­ Ô±½¿¬·±² ß¼¼»¼ Í°¿½»­ ¬± ·²½®»¿­» ¬¸» ²«³¾»® ±º ­°¿½»­ ·³³»¼·¿¬»´§ô ±² ¿² ·²¬»®·³ ¾¿­·­ô ¿²¼ ©±®µ ¬±©¿®¼ ­»½«®·²¹ ´±²¹ ¬»®³ °«¾´·½ °¿®µ·²¹ò ̸» λóͬ®·°·²¹ øçóº¬ò ­°¿½»­÷ ïëõ ½±­¬ ±º ½®»¿¬·²¹ ­±³» ±º ¬¸»­» ­°¿½»­ ¸±©»ª»®ô ½±«´¼ ¾» ¸·¹¸ Ó»¼·½¿´ Þ«·´¼·²¹ î𠼫» ¬± ¹®¿¼» ½¸¿²¹»­ô ¼®¿·²¿¹» ¿²¼ ®»´±½¿¬·±² ±º ½«®¾­ò ß ²»¬ ·²½®»¿­» ±º ¿¾±«¬ ïë ­°¿½»­ ½±«´¼ ¾» ¿½¸·»ª»¼ ¿¬ ´·¬¬´» ½±­¬å ݸ¿­» Ô±¬ êð ¿¾±«¬ íë ­°¿½»­ ½±«´¼ ¾» ¿½¸·»ª»¼ ¿¬ ¸·¹¸»® ½±­¬ò ß² Í«¾ó̱¬¿´ çë ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ ïí ±® ­± ­°¿½»­ ½±«´¼ ¾» ¿½¸·»ª»¼ ·º ¬¸» »²¬·®» ½»²¬»® ©»®» ¬± ¾» ®»ó­¬®·°»¼ ©·¬¸ èòë󺱱¬ ©·¼» ­°¿½»­ô ©¸·½¸ ÍÓË Ð¿®µ·²¹ ø­«³³»®÷ éë ·­ ¬¸» ­¬¿²¼¿®¼ ·² ³±­¬ ½·¬·»­ò ̱¬¿´ ïéð Ò»¿®óÌ»®³ п®µ·²¹ ͬ®¿¬»¹§ò Ò»¿®ó¬»®³ ·²¬»®·³ °¿®µ·²¹ ³¿§ ¾» ¿½¸·»ª»¼ ¾§ ®»ó­¬®·°·²¹ ­°¿½»­ ·² ¬¸» °«¾´·½ ®·¹¸¬ó±ºó©¿§ô ¿²¼ ©±®µ·²¹ ©·¬¸ °®±°»®¬§ ±©²»®­ ¬± ·²½®»¿­» ïí Í ² × ¼ » ® ñ Ø × ´ ´ ½ ® » ­ ¬ Í ¬ ® ¿ ¬ » ¹ × ½ Ð ´ ¿ ² ¬¸» ²«³¾»® ­°¿½»­ «­·²¹ ¿ ½±³¾·²¿¬·±² ±º °«¾´·½ ¿²¼ °®·ª¿¬» ´¿²¼ò ̸·­ ½±«´¼ ·²½´«¼» ³¿µ·²¹ »ºº·½·»²¬ «­» ±º ¿´´»§ ¿²¼ ­·¼»ó­¬®»»¬ °¿®µ·²¹ò øÍ»» ¾»´±©ò÷ Ò±²» ±º ¬¸»­» ®»ó­¬®·°·²¹ »ºº±®¬­ ­¸±«´¼ ®»­«´¬ ·² ®»¼«½·²¹ ¬¸» ½«®®»²¬ ­·¦» ±º °¿®µ·²¹ ­°¿½»­ò ײ ¿¼¼·¬·±²ô ­«®°´«­ ­°¿½»­ ³¿§ ¾» ²»¹±¬·¿¬»¼ ©·¬¸ °®±°»®¬§ ±©²»®­ ¬¸¿¬ ¿®» ²±¬ «¬·´·¦·²¹ ¿´´ ±º ¬¸»·® ­°¿½»­ò ̸» Í°±®¬­ Ó»¼·½·²» Þ«·´¼·²¹ ¸¿­ ·²¼·½¿¬»¼ ¬¸» ¿ª¿·´¿¾·´·¬§ ±º ¿°°®±¨·³¿¬»´§ îð ­°¿½»­ ¬¸¿¬ ½±«´¼ ¾» ´»¿­»¼ «²¬·´ ¬¸»§ ¿®» ²»»¼»¼ ¾§ ¬»²¿²¬­å ¿²¼ ÍÓË ¸¿­ ·²¼·½¿¬»¼ ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸»§ ©±«´¼ ³¿µ» éë ­°¿½»­ ¿ª¿·´¿¾´» ¼«®·²¹ ­«³³»® ³±²¬¸­ô ©¸»² ­½¸±±´ ·­ ±«¬ò ß¼¼·¬·±²¿´´§ô ¬¸» ݸ¿­» ¾«·´¼·²¹ °¿®µ·²¹ ´±¬ ·­ ´¿®¹»´§ ª¿½¿²¬ ©·¬¸ ·¬­ ½«®®»²¬ ±½½«°¿²½§ô ¿²¼ ·¬ ·­ »­¬·³¿¬»¼ ¬¸¿¬ ¿°°®±¨·³¿¬»´§ êð ­°¿½»­ ½±«´¼ ¾» ³¿¼» ¿ª¿·´¿¾´» ·² ¬¸¿¬ ´±½¿¬·±²ò ̸» ¬±¬¿´ ²«³¾»® ±º ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ °¿®µ·²¹ ­°¿½»­ ¬¸¿¬ ½±«´¼ ¾» ¿ª¿·´¿¾´» ·² ¬¸» ²»¿® ¬»®³ô º±® ¿² ·²¬»®·³ °»®·±¼ô ½±«´¼ ¾» ¿­ ³¿²§ ¿­ çë °´«­ ¬¸» éë ¾»·²¹ ±ºº»®»¼ ¾§ ÍÓË ¼«®·²¹ ¬¸» ­«³³»®ò ̸·­ ¼±»­ ²±¬ º«´´§ ³¿µ» «° ¬¸» ¼»º·½·¬ô ¾«¬ ·º ¬¸» ®»³±¬» °¿®µ·²¹ ±² ¬¸» ݸ¿­» ¿²¼ Ó»¼·½¿´ Þ«·´¼·²¹ ­·¬»­ ½¿² ¾» ­»½«®»¼ô ¿¾±«¬ èð ­°¿½»­ ½±«´¼ ¾» ³¿¼» ¿ª¿·´¿¾´» º±® ´±²¹ ¬»®³ «­» ¾§ »³°´±§»»­ ø·² ¿¼¼·¬·±² ¬± ¬¸» ¿´´±©»¼ ´±²¹ó¬»®³ ±²ó­¬®»»¬ °¿®µ·²¹ ±² Ø«®­»§ ߪ»ò ¿²¼ ¬¸» ­·¼» ­¬®»»¬­ ¿¼¶¿½»²¬ ¬± ¬¸» д¿¦¿÷ò ̸·­ ©·´´ ³¿µ» ¿ ¼·ºº»®»²½»å ¿²¼ »ºº»½¬·ª» î󸱫® °¿®µ·²¹ »²º±®½»³»²¬ ½±«´¼ ±½½«®ò Þ»´±© ·­ ¿ ¾®·»º ´±±µ ¿¬ ®»ó­¬®·°·²¹ ±°°±®¬«²·¬·»­ ·² Ͳ·¼»® д¿¦¿ò ÎóÐÎóóÉÜ ÛÍÌÎ×Ð×ÒÙËÞÔ×Ý×ÙØÌÑÚßÇ ÑÒ ßÒ×ÛÔ Ý·­½± Ù®·´´ Õ«¾§?­ ×­­«»­ ±² Ü¿²·»´ ·²½´«¼» °®±ª·¼·²¹ º±® ¿½½»­­ ¬± Õ«¾§?­ ´±¿¼·²¹ ¼±½µ¿²¼ ¾«³°·²¹ ±«¬ ¬¸» °»¼»­¬®·¿² ½®±­­·²¹ò ر©»ª»®ô ·¬ °®±ª·¼»­ ¿ º®»» ©»­¬¾±«²¼ ¬«®² ´¿²» ·²¬± ¬¸» °´¿¦¿ º®±³ Ü¿²·»´ò ïì Í ² × ¼ » ® ñ Ø × ´ ´ ½ ® » ­ ¬ Í ¬ ® ¿ ¬ » ¹ × ½ Ð ´ ¿ ² ÐóÐÝÎ ËÞÔ×ÝÎ×ÊßÌÛÑÑÐÛÎßÌ×ÑÒ ÒÛßÎ ÑÍÛÜßÔÛ ×­­«»­ ±² α­»¼¿´» ·²½´«¼» ±°»²·²¹ «° ¬¸» ³»¼·¿² ±º α­»¼¿´» ¿²¼ Ͳ·¼»® ¬± »¿­» ¬®¿ºº·½ ½±²¹»­¬·±² ¿¬ ¬¸» ½±­¬ ±º ë °¿®µ·²¹ ­°¿½»­ò ̸»­» ë ­°¿½»­ ½¿² ¾» ®»½±«°»¼ ¿´±²¹ ©·¬¸ ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ °¿®µ·²¹ ©·¬¸ ¬¸» ­½»²¿®·± ¿¾±ª» ±® ¾»´±©ò ̸» ­½»²¿®·± ¿¾±ª» ®»¯«·®»­ ©±®µ·²¹ ©·¬¸ ¬¸» ¿¼¶¿½»²¬ °®±°»®¬§ ±©²»® ¬± ®»½±²º·¹«®» ¬¸»·® °¿®µ·²¹ô ¿²¼ ·¬ ·²ª±´ª»­ ¹®¿¼» ½¸¿²¹»­ô ¿² »¨·­¬·²¹ ©¿´´ ¿²¼ ®»½±²­¬®«½¬·±² ±º ¼®¿·²¿¹» ¿²¼ ½«®¾­ò ׬ ¿´­± ®»¯«·®»­ ½®»¿¬·²¹ ¿ ±²»ó©¿§ ½±«°´»¬ ¬¸®±«¹¸ ¬¸» °¿®µ·²¹ ¿®»¿ò ̸·­ ­½»²¿®·± ¸±©»ª»® ½±«´¼ §·»´¼ «° ¬± ïë ²»¬ ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ ­°¿½»­ò ̸» ­½»²¿®·± ¾»´±© ±°»²­ «° α­»¼¿´» ¾«¬ ´»¿ª»­ ·¬ î󩿧 ·² ¬¸·­ ­»½¬·±² ¿²¼ ²»¬­ ì ­°¿½»­ ¾§ ³¿µ·²¹ ¬¸» °¿®µ·²¹ ¿´±²¹ ¬¸» ­¬®»»¬ çðó¼»¹®»»­ ®¿¬¸»® ¬¸¿² ¿²¹´»¼ò ײ ¿¼¼·¬·±²ô ¬¸»®» ·­ ¿² »¨¬®¿ ï𠺻»¬ ·² ¬¸» ¼®·ª» ´¿²»­ ¬¸¿¬ ½±«´¼ ¾» «­»¼ ¬± ½®»¿¬» ¿ ­·¼»©¿´µ ±² ¬¸» ­±«¬¸ ­·¼» ±º ¬¸» ­¬®»»¬ò ïë Í ² × ¼ » ® ñ Ø × ´ ´ ½ ® » ­ ¬ Í ¬ ® ¿ ¬ » ¹ × ½ Ð ´ ¿ ² ÐóÐÝÎ ËÞÔ×ÝÎ×ÊßÌÛÑÑÐÛÎßÌ×ÑÒ ÒÛßÎ ßÒÕ×Ò Ý«®®»²¬´§ ¬¸» ¼±«¾´»ó¼»°¬¸ ø¬¿²¼»³÷ °¿®µ·²¹ ¾»¸·²¼ ¬¸» ¾«·´¼·²¹­ ­±«¬¸ ±º ο²µ·² ·­ ·²»ºº·½·»²¬ ¿²¼ ±²´§ °¿®¬·¿´´§ «­»¼ò Þ§ ­¸·º¬·²¹ ¬¸» ¿´´»§ ±ª»® ¿²¼ ½®»¿¬·²¹ ¿²¹´»¼ °¿®µ·²¹ ±² ¾±¬¸ ­·¼»­ô ¿² ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ ç ­°¿½»­ ½±«´¼ ¾» ¿½¸·»ª»¼ò ×­­«»­ ®»´¿¬»¼ ¬± ½®»¿¬·²¹ ¬¸»­» ­°¿½»­ ·²½´«¼» ³¿µ·²¹ ­«®» ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸»®» ·­ ¿¼»¯«¿¬» ¬®«½µ ¬®¿²­·¬·±² ¾»¬©»»² ¬¸» ¿´´»§ ¿²¼ ¬¸» ®»¿´·¹²»¼ ¿´´»§ô ¿²¼ »²­«®·²¹ ¬¸¿¬ ¼«³°­¬»® ´±½¿¬·±²­ ¿®» ¿°°®±°®·¿¬»ò ÐóÐÝÉ ËÞÔ×ÝÎ×ÊßÌÛÑÑÐÛÎßÌ×ÑÒ ÒÛßÎ ÛÍÌÓ×ÒÍÌÛÎ ×­­«»­ ±² Ͳ·¼»® ­±«¬¸ ±º Ô±ª»®­ Ô¿²» ·²½´«¼» ®»ó­¬®·°·²¹ ¬¸» °¿®µ·²¹ ·² º®±²¬ ±º ¬¸» Í°±®¬­ Ó»¼·½·²» ¾«·´¼·²¹ ¬± °®±ª·¼» »²±«¹¸ ©·¼¬¸ º±® ¿² ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ ¾¿§ ±º °¿®µ·²¹ ·² ¬¸» ½»²¬»® ±º ¬¸» ®±¿¼©¿§ò ײ ¿¼¼·¬·±²ô ¬¸» ¼®¿·²¿¹» ½¸¿²²»´ ¿´±²¹ ¬¸» ©»­¬ ­·¼» ±º Ͳ·¼»® ·­ °®±²±«²½»¼ ¿²¼ ½±«´¼ ¿ºº»½¬ ¬¸» ­¸·º¬»¼ ®±¿¼©¿§ô ¿²¼ ¬¸» ̱³ ²»©´§ ½±²­¬®«½¬»¼ ½«®¾ ·­´¿²¼­ ¿¬ Ô±ª»®­ ̸«³¾ Ô¿²» ©±«´¼ ²»»¼ ¬± ¾» ®»½±²º·¹«®»¼ò ̸» Ù®±½»®§ ²»¬ ·²½®»¿­» ±º é °¿®µ·²¹ ­°¿½»­ ©±«´¼ ¾» »¨°»²­·ª» ¬± ½®»¿¬»ò Í°±®¬­ Ó»¼·½·²» Þ«·´¼·²¹ ïê Í ² × ¼ » ® ñ Ø × ´ ´ ½ ® » ­ ¬ Í ¬ ® ¿ ¬ » ¹ × ½ Ð ´ ¿ ² Ô±²¹óÌ»®³ п®µ·²¹ ͬ®¿¬»¹§ò ̸»®» ¿®» ¬©± ±°¬·±²­ º±® ´±²¹ó¬»®³ °»®³¿²»²¬ °¿®µ·²¹ò Ѳ» ·­ ¬± ½±²­¬®«½¬ ¿ ´»ª»´ ±º °¿®µ·²¹ ¾»´±© ¬¸» Ͳ·¼»® д¿¦¿ ®·¹¸¬ó±ºó©¿§ ¾»¬©»»² Ü¿²·»´ ¿²¼ ο²µ·²ò ̸» ±¬¸»® ·­ ¬± °¿§ º±® ¿² ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ ´»ª»´ ±º «²¼»®¹®±«²¼ °¿®µ·²¹ º±® ¿²§ ´¿®¹» ­½¿´» ®»¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ò п®µ·²¹ ¾»²»¿¬¸ Ͳ·¼»® ·­ ²±¬ ½±²­·¼»®»¼ ¿ ª·¿¾´» ±°¬·±²ô ¾«¬ ·¬ ¼±»­ ¿ª±·¼ °«®½¸¿­·²¹ °®·ª¿¬» °®±°»®¬§ô ¿²¼ ½¿² ¾» ½±²­¬®«½¬»¼ ©·¬¸·² ½«®®»²¬ ®·¹¸¬­ó±ºó©¿§ò ݱ²­¬®«½¬·±² ¸±©»ª»®ô ©±«´¼ ®»¯«·®» ¬¸» º«´´ ©·¼¬¸ ±º ¬¸» ®·¹¸¬ó±ºó©¿§ ? ª·®¬«¿´´§ º®±³ ¾«·´¼·²¹ º¿½» ¬± ¾«·´¼·²¹ º¿½» ó ·² ±®¼»® ¬± ¾«·´¼ ¿ ïîð󺱱¬ ©·¼» °¿®µ·²¹ ¹¿®¿¹»ò ̸·­ ©±«´¼ ¸¿ª» ¿ ³¿¶±® ·³°¿½¬ ±² ¿¼¶¿½»²¬ ¾«­·²»­­»­ô ¾±¬¸ ·² ¬¸» ´±­­ ±º °¿®µ·²¹ ¿²¼ ·² ¬¸» ´±­­ ±º ¿½½»­­·¾·´·¬§ ¬± ¬¸»·® º®±²¬ ¼±±®­ ¼«®·²¹ ½±²­¬®«½¬·±²ò ײ ¿¼¼·¬·±²ô ¬¸» «²¼»®¹®±«²¼ °¿®µ·²¹ ©±«´¼ ­«ºº»® º®±³ ¬¸» ­¿³» °®±¾´»³ ¿­ ¬¸» ¿¬ó¹®¿¼» °¿®µ·²¹ ¼±»­ ²±© ? ¿ ­·²¹´» ¿·­´» ¿½½»­­·²¹ ¿´´ ¬¸» °¿®µ·²¹ ­°¿½»­ô ¿²¼ ¬¸»®» ©±«´¼ ¾» ±²´§ ±²» »²¬®§ ¿²¼ »¨·¬ °±·²¬ô ¿²¼ ¿¬ó¹®¿¼» ´¿²¼­½¿°·²¹ ©±«´¼ ¾» ´·³·¬»¼ ¬± ­¸®«¾­ ¿²¼ ­³¿´´ ¬®»»­ ¼«» ¬± ¬¸» ¸·¹¸ ´±¿¼ º¿½¬±® º±® ¬®»»­ô ­±·´ ¿²¼ ©¿¬»®ò ïé Í ² × ¼ » ® ñ Ø × ´ ´ ½ ® » ­ ¬ Í ¬ ® ¿ ¬ » ¹ × ½ Ð ´ ¿ ² б­­·¾´» îçì ̱¬¿´ Í°¿½»­ ©·¬¸ α­»¼¿´» Û²¬®§ б­­·¾´» îìè ̱¬¿´ Í°¿½»­ ©·¬¸ Ͳ·¼»®ñÜ¿²·»´ Û²¬®§ ïè Í ² × ¼ » ® ñ Ø × ´ ´ ½ ® » ­ ¬ Í ¬ ® ¿ ¬ » ¹ × ½ Ð ´ ¿ ² п®µ·²¹ Þ»²»¿¬¸ Ô¿®¹» λ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ò Ô¿®¹» ­·¬»­ô ·²½´«¼·²¹ ¸¿´º ¾´±½µ­ô ½±«´¼ ¿½½±³³±¼¿¬» ¿ °¿®µ·²¹ ¹¿®¿¹»ô ©·¬¸ ¬¸» »¨½»°¬·±² ±º ¬¸» ¿´´»§ó¾¿½µ»¼ ¸¿´ºó¾´±½µ­ º¿½·²¹ Ø·´´½®»­¬ô ©¸·½¸ ¿®» ¬±± ²¿®®±©ò ̸»®» ¿®» ½«®®»²¬´§ ¬©± ´¿®¹» ½±²­±´·¼¿¬»¼ ­·¬»­ ·² Ͳ·¼»® д¿¦¿ ¬¸¿¬ ½±«´¼ ¿½½±³³±¼¿¬» °¿®µ·²¹ ¹¿®¿¹»­ ? ¬¸» ̱³ ̸«³¾ ­¬±®» ­·¬» ¿²¼ ¬¸» ݸ¿­» ­·¬»ò ر©»ª»®ô ½±²­±´·¼¿¬·±² ±º ±¬¸»® ´¿²¼ ¸¿­ ¾»»² ±½½«®®·²¹ ¿²¼ ­±³» ®»¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ ·­ ª»®§ ´·µ»´§ ¿¬ ­±³» °±·²¬ ·² ¬¸» º«¬«®»ò п®µ·²¹ ­¬®«½¬«®»­ ¾»´±©ó¹®¿¼» ¿®» ¾»·²¹ ®»½±³³»²¼»¼ ¾»½¿«­» ¾´±½µ­ ·² ¬¸» ¼·­¬®·½¬ ¿®» ®»´¿¬·ª»´§ ­³¿´´ ¿²¼ ­«½¸ ­¬®«½¬«®»­ô ·º ½±²­¬®«½¬»¼ ¿¾±ª» ¹®¿¼»ô ©±«´¼ ¼±³·²¿¬» ¬¸» ¼·­¬®·½¬ò ̸·­ ©±«´¼ ¾» ¿²¿¬¸»³¿ ¬± »²¸¿²½·²¹ ¬¸» ¿®»¿ ¿­ ¿ °»¼»­¬®·¿²óº®·»²¼´§ ¼·­¬®·½¬ò ß¼¼·¬·±²¿´´§ô ·º ­¬®«½¬«®»­ ¿®» °´¿½»¼ ¾»´±© ¹®¿¼»ô ¬¸»§ ½¿² »¨¬»²¼ ¾»²»¿¬¸ ¿´´»§­ ¿²¼ ­·¼»©¿´µ­ ¬± ·²½®»¿­» ¬¸»·® »ºº·½·»²½§ ¿²¼ º«²½¬·±²¿´·¬§ ©¸»®» ²»½»­­¿®§ò ײ º¿½¬ô ©·¬¸ ¬¸» °±­­·¾´» »¨½»°¬·±² ±º ¬¸» ݸ¿­» Þ¿²µ ¿²¼ ̱³ ̸«³¾ ­·¬»­ô ¿¼¼·²¹ °¿®µ·²¹ ¿¾±ª» ¹®¿¼» ©·´´ ®»³±ª» ¬¸» ¿¾·´·¬§ ¬± ¿½¸·»ª» ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ ­·¬» ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ ¾»½¿«­» ±º ­·¬» ¼»°¬¸­ ¿²¼ ¸»·¹¸¬ ´·³·¬­ ·² °´¿½»ò ̸» ·´´«­¬®¿¬·±²­ ¾»´±© ¬»­¬ ¬¸» ³±­¬ ®»­¬®·½¬·ª» ½±²¼·¬·±²­ º±® ½±²­¬®«½¬·²¹ ¿ °¿®µ·²¹ ¹¿®¿¹» ¾§ ¬»­¬·²¹ ¬¸» ­³¿´´»­¬ ¼»°¬¸ ¾´±½µ ¬¸¿¬ ½±«´¼ ¿½½±³³±¼¿¬» ¿ ¹¿®¿¹»ò ̱± Ò¿®®±© ¬± ¿½½±³³±¼¿¬» ¿ ¹¿®¿¹» ïç Í ² × ¼ » ® ñ Ø × ´ ´ ½ ® » ­ ¬ Í ¬ ® ¿ ¬ » ¹ × ½ Ð ´ ¿ ² Ü ÛÊÛÔÑÐÓÛÒÌ ßÐÍ ÜÜ×Ì×ÑÒßÔ ßÎÕ×ÒÙÐßÝÛÍ Ú ÔÑÑÎ Ñ ÐÌ×ÑÒ øØÞ÷ ßÔÚÔÑÝÕ í Ù®±«²¼ Ô»ª»´ ìð Ѻº·½» øíïôîðð ­º÷ î ïðì ­°¿½»­ ˲¼»®¹®±«²¼ ø°»® ´»ª»´÷ ïðð ï λ¬¿·´ øîðôððð÷ èð ­°¿½»­ Ô±©»­¬ Ô»ª»´ éð ̱¬¿´ ïèì ­°¿½»­ ̱¬¿´ øí ´»ª»´­÷îïð ­°¿½»­ Ú®±³ ¬¸» »¨¿³°´» ¿¾±ª»ô îïð ­°¿½»­ ¿®» °®±ª·¼»¼ º±® °¿®µ·²¹ ·² ¿² »­­»²¬·¿´´§ í󴻪»´ ¹¿®¿¹»ò ׺ ¬¸» ­·¬» ¼»ª»´±°­ ¬± ¬¸®»» ­¬±®·»­ô ¬¸»² ¿² ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ ïðê °¿®µ·²¹ ­°¿½»­ ½±«´¼ ¾»½±³» ¿ª¿·´¿¾´» º±® °«¾´·½ «­»ò ̸·­ ·²½´«¼»­ ïððû ±º ¬¸» ®»¬¿·´ °¿®µ·²¹ ? èð ­°¿½»­ ø©¸·½¸ °®·±® ¬± ®»¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ ©¿­ ´±½¿¬»¼ ±² Ͳ·¼»® д¿¦¿÷ ? °´«­ ¬¸» »¨¬®¿ îê ­°¿½»­ ²±¬ ®»¯«·®»¼ º±® ¬¸» ±ºº·½» ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ò ̸·­ ©±«´¼ ¾» ¿ ³¿¶±® ½±²¬®·¾«¬·±² ¬± ®»´·»ª·²¹ ¬¸» ½¸®±²·½ ­¸±®¬¿¹» ±º °¿®µ·²¹ ·² ¬¸» Ͳ·¼»® д¿¦¿ ¿®»¿ò îð Í ² × ¼ » ® ñ Ø × ´ ´ ½ ® » ­ ¬ Í ¬ ® ¿ ¬ » ¹ × ½ Ð ´ ¿ ² ×ÓÐÔÛÓÛÒÌßÌ×ÑÒ ÍÌÎßÌÛÙÇ Ì¸·­ д¿² ­¸±«´¼ ¾» ¿¼±°¬»¼ ¾§ ®»­±´«¬·±² ¿­ °¿®¬ ±º °¸¿­» ±²» ±º ·¬­ ·³°´¿²¬¿¬·±² ·² ±®¼»® ¬± »­¬¿¾´·­¸ ¿ ¹»²»®¿´ ¼·®»½¬·±² º±® ¿½¬«¿´ ·³°´»³»²¬¿¬·±²ò Ú±® °¸¿­» ¬©±ô Ý·¬§ ݱ«²½·´ ­¸±«´¼ »­¬¿¾´·­¸ ¿² ß¼ª·­±®§ Ù®±«° ½±³°®·­»¼ ±º °®±°»®¬§ ±©²»®­ô ³»®½¸¿²¬­ô ¿®»¿ ®»­·¼»²¬­ ¿²¼ ½·¬·¦»²­ ¿¬ ´¿®¹»ô ¬± ®»ª·»© ¿²¼ ³¿µ» ­°»½·º·½ ®»½±³³»²¼¿¬·±²­ ±² ¬¸» ·¬»³­ ¾»´±©ò ÍÌøïîóîì÷ ØÑÎÌ ÛÎÓ ÓÑÒÌØÍ Í»½«®» ïêðõ ­°¿½»­ ±² ·²¬»®·³ ¾¿­·­ò ̸·­ ½¿² ¾» ¿½½±³°´·­¸»¼ ¬¸®±«¹¸ ®»ó­¬®·°·²¹ »¨·­¬·²¹ °¿®µ·²¹ ¿®»¿­ ¬± ¹¿·² ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ ­°¿½»­ ø©¸·´» ½±²¬·²«·²¹ ¬± »²­«®» º«´´ó­·¦» ­°¿½»­÷ò ̸·­ ©·´´ ®»¯«·®» ²»¹±¬·¿¬·²¹ ©·¬¸ °®±°»®¬§ ±©²»®­ô ¿­ ·¬ ©·´´ ²»½»­­·¬¿¬» ®»¿´·¹²³»²¬ ±º ­±³» »¨·­¬·²¹ ­°¿½»­ ¬± ¹¿·² ¿ ³±®» »ºº·½·»²¬ ´¿§±«¬ò ̸·­ ­±´«¬·±²ô ¸±©»ª»® ·­ ²±¬ ¿ ´±²¹ ¬»®³ ­±´«¬·±²ô ¿²¼ ­¸±«´¼ ·² ³±­¬ ½¿­»­ ¾» ´¿®¹»´§ ®»¬«®²»¼ ¬± ¬¸» ½«®®»²¬ ½±²º·¹«®¿¬·±² ±²½» ¬¸» °¿®µ·²¹ ­¸±®¬¿¹» ½¿² ¾» ®»½¬·º·»¼ ¬¸®±«¹¸ ¬¸» °®±ª·­·±² ±º ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ ´±²¹ ¬»®³ °«¾´·½ °¿®µ·²¹ ­°¿½»­ò ß¼¼·¬·±²¿´´§ô ­°¿½»­ ³¿§ ¾» ²»¹±¬·¿¬»¼ º®±³ °®±°»®¬§ ±©²»®­ ©¸± ¿®» ²±¬ ½«®®»²¬´§ «­·²¹ ¬¸»·® º«´´ ²«³¾»® ±º ­°¿½»­ô ­«½¸ ¿­ ¬¸» ݸ¿­» Þ«·´¼·²¹ ô ¬¸» Í°±®¬­ Ó»¼·½·²» Þ«·´¼·²¹ ¿²¼ ÍÓËò Þ»»º «° °¿®µ·²¹ »²º±®½»³»²¬ò ̸» °®±ª·­·±² ±º ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ °¿®µ·²¹ ¬¸¿¬ ½¿² ¾» ¿­­·¹²»¼ ¬± ´±²¹ ¬»®³ »³°´±§»» °¿®µ·²¹ô ©·´´ ¿´´±© ¬¸» »²º±®½»³»²¬ ±º ¬¸» »¨·­¬·²¹ ¬©±ó¸±«® °¿®µ·²¹ ®»­¬®·½¬·±²­ ·² ³±­¬ ±º ¬¸» д¿¦¿ ¿®»¿ò ̸·­ ·­ ¿ µ»§ »´»³»²¬ ·² ¬¸» ­¬®¿¬»¹§ ¬± º®»» «° ½±²ª»²·»²¬ ½«­¬±³»® °¿®µ·²¹ ¿²¼ ¿¬¬®¿½¬ ½«­¬±³»®­ ¬± ¬¸» д¿¦¿ò Ы¬ ·² °´¿½» º±®³ó¾¿­»¼ ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ ­¬¿²¼¿®¼­ò Ò»© ­¬¿²¼¿®¼­ ©¸·½¸ ¿®» º±½«­»¼ ±² ½®»¿¬·²¹ ¿ ­«½½»­­º«´ °»¼»­¬®·¿² ¼·­¬®·½¬? ­¸±«´¼ ¾» °«¬ ·² °´¿½» ·² ±®¼»® ¬± »²­«®» ¬¸¿¬ º«¬«®» ®»¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ »ºº±®¬­ ­»®ª» ¬± ®»·²º±®½» ¬¸» °»¼»­¬®·¿² ½¸¿®¿½¬»® ±º ¬¸» ¼·­¬®·½¬ò Í«½¸ ­¬¿²¼¿®¼­ ­¸±«´¼ ·²½´«¼» ? Û­¬¿¾´·­¸·²¹ ­¬®»»¬­½¿°» ­¬¿²¼¿®¼­ ¬¸¿¬ ©·´´ °®±ª·¼» ­¸¿¼» ¬®»»­ º±® °»¼»­¬®·¿²­ ¿²¼ ¢ °¿ª·²¹ò Û²­«®·²¹ ¯«¿´·¬§ ¾«·´¼·²¹ ³¿¬»®·¿´­ ¿²¼ ­·¹²¿¹»ô ¿­ ©»´´ ¿­ ¿¬ó¹®¿¼» ®»¬¿·´ «­»­ ¿²¼ ¢ ©·²¼±©­ò ß¼¼®»­­·²¹ ¾«·´¼·²¹ ¸»·¹¸¬ ¿²¼ °®±º·´»ò ¢ Û­¬¿¾´·­¸ ¿ °®±¹®¿³ º±® °»¼»­¬®·¿² ¿²¼ ®±¿¼©¿§ ·³°®±ª»³»²¬­ò ×¼»²¬·º§ ­·¼»©¿´µ ¿²¼ ®±¿¼©¿§ ·³°®±ª»³»²¬­ º±® ·²½´«­·±² ·² ¬¸» Ý·¬§?­ ½¿°·¬¿´ ·³°®±ª»³»²¬ °´¿²ô ©·¬¸ ¬¿®¹»¬ ½±²­¬®«½¬·±² ¬·³» º®¿³»­ò Ü»­·¹² ¿²¼ ·²­¬¿´´ ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ »²¬®§ ³±²«³»²¬¿¬·±²ò Ѳ» ±º ¬¸» ¯«·½µ»­¬ ©¿§­ ¬± »²¸¿²½» ¬¸» ¼·­¬®·½¬ ¿²¼ ¼»³±²­¬®¿¬» ¿ ½±³³·¬³»²¬ ¬± ¬¸» ´±²¹ ¬»®³ °´¿² ·­ ¬± ·²­¬¿´´ »²¬®§ ³±²«³»²¬¿¬·±² º±® Ͳ·¼»® д¿¦¿ ¿´±²¹ Ø·´´½®»­¬ ¿²¼ Ô±ª»®­ Ô¿²»ò Û­¬¿¾´·­¸ º«²¼·²¹ ³»½¸¿²·­³­ò ׳³»¼·¿¬» ¿²¼ ´±²¹ ¬»®³ º«²¼·²¹ º±® ·³°®±ª»³»²¬­ ¿®» ª·¬¿´ ¬± »­¬¿¾´·­¸·²¹ ¿²¼ ³¿·²¬¿·²·²¹ ³±³»²¬«³ ·² Ͳ·¼»®ñØ·´´½®»­¬ò Í«½¸ ¿ ½±³³·¬³»²¬ º®±³ ¬¸» Ý·¬§ ©·´´ ´»ª»®¿¹» °®·ª¿¬» ·²ª»­¬³»²¬ ·² ¬¸» ¿®»¿ò Ú±® »¨¿³°´»æ îï Í ² × ¼ » ® ñ Ø × ´ ´ ½ ® » ­ ¬ Í ¬ ® ¿ ¬ » ¹ × ½ Ð ´ ¿ ² ̸» Ý·¬§ ½±«´¼ º«²¼ ½±²­¬®«½¬·±² ±º «²¼»®ó¹®±«²¼ °¿®µ·²¹ «­·²¹ ´±© ·²¬»®»­¬ ¢ ®»ª»²«» ¾±²¼­ ¹«¿®¿²¬»»¼ ¾§ ¿ ´»¿­»ó¾¿½µ º®±³ ¬¸» ¼»ª»´±°»® º±® ¸·­ ®»¯«·®»¼ °¿®µ·²¹ ­°¿½»­ò ̸·­ ©±«´¼ »²­«®» ¬¸¿¬ °«¾´·½ °¿®µ·²¹ ·­ ½®»¿¬»¼ ¿²¼ ³¿¼» ¿ª¿·´¿¾´»ò ß Ð«¾´·½ ׳°®±ª»³»²¬ Ü·­¬®·½¬ øÐ×Ü÷ ½±«´¼ ¾» «­»¼ ¬± º«²¼ ´»¿­»¼ ­«®°´«­ ­¬¿´´­ º±® ¢ ´±²¹ ¬»®³ °¿®µ·²¹ò ̸·­ ©±«´¼ ¾» ¿ ª»®§ ½±­¬ó»ºº»½¬·ª» ©¿§ ¬± º«²¼ ¿² ·²½®»¿­»¼ ²«³¾»® ±º ­°¿½»­ ¾§ °®±°»®¬§ó±©²»®­ ¿²¼ ³»®½¸¿²¬­ò Ý¿­¸ó·² Ô·»« øÝ×Ô÷ º±® °¿®µ·²¹ ¬¸¿¬ ½¿²²±¬ ¾» ¿½½±³³±¼¿¬»¼ ±² ­·¬» º±® ­³¿´´»® ¢ ®»¼»ª»´±°³»²¬­ ½±«´¼ ¿´­± °®±ª·¼» ¿ ½±­¬ »ºº·½·»²¬ ³»¿²­ ¬± »²­«®» ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ °¿®µ·²¹ ±ª»® ¬¸» ´±²¹ ¬»®³ò ß Ý×Ô ®¿¬» ½±«´¼ ¾» »­¬¿¾´·­¸»¼ ¾§ ¬¿µ·²¹ ¬¸» ½±­¬ ±º ½±²­¬®«½¬·±² ±º ¿ ­¬®«½¬«®»¼ °¿®µ·²¹ ­°¿½» ·²½´«¼·²¹ ¿½½»­­ ´¿²»ô ¿²¼ ®»¼«½» ·¬ ¾§ ¿ º¿½¬±® ¬¸¿¬ ©±«´¼ ®»º´»½¬ ¬¸» »ºº·½·»²½§ ±º ­¸¿®»¼ °¿®µ·²¹ ±² ¿² ¿®»¿ó©·¼» ¾¿­·­ò Ô¿²¼ ½±­¬ ²»»¼ ²±¬ ¾» ½±²­·¼»®»¼ ·² ¬¸» ½±­¬ ­·²½» ¿´´ ²»© °¿®µ·²¹ ©·´´ ¾» °¿®¬ ±º °®·ª¿¬» ®»¼»ª»´±°³»²¬­ ¿²¼ ©·´´ ²±¬ ®»¯«·®» ¬¸» ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ °«®½¸¿­» ±º ´¿²¼ò ß Ì¿¨ λ·²ª»­¬³»²¬ Ʊ²» øÌÎÆ÷ ¬± ¼»­·¹²¿¬» ¿² ±²¹±·²¹ ­±«®½» ±º º«²¼­ º±® ¢ ®»·²ª»­¬³»²¬ ·² ¬¸» ¿®»¿ò ß ÌÎÆ ·­ ¿ ­°»½·¿´ ¼·­¬®·½¬ ©¸»®»¾§ ¿ °±®¬·±² ±º ¬¸» ²±®³¿´ ·²½®»¿­» ·² °®±°»®¬§ ¬¿¨»­ ¼«» ¬± ·²½®»¿­»¼ ª¿´«» ·­ ½¿°¬«®»¼ ¿²¼ ®»·²ª»­¬»¼ ·² ¬¸» ¼·­¬®·½¬ò Ñ°»² α­»¼¿´» º±® ¾»¬¬»® ½·®½«´¿¬·±²ò ײ ¿² »ºº±®¬ ¬± ®»¼«½» ¿«¬±³±¾·´» ¾¿½µó«°­ ·² ¬¸» ³±­¬ ½±²¹»­¬»¼ ¿®»¿ ±º Ͳ·¼»® д¿¦¿ô α­»¼¿´» ­¸±«´¼ ¾» ±°»²»¼ «° ¬± ¿´´±© ª»¸·½´»­ ¬± ½·®½«´¿¬» ±«¬ ±º ¬¸» ­·²¹´» ¬®¿ª»´ ´¿²» ¬¸¿¬ ¾±¬¬´»²»½µ­ ¬®¿ºº·½ò ÓóÌøîóë÷ ×ÜÛÎÓ ÇÛßÎÍ ×²­¬¿´´ °»¼»­¬®·¿² »²¸¿²½»³»²¬­ ­«½¸ ¿­ ­¬®»»¬ ¬®»»­ô ½®±­­ó©¿´µ­ ¿²¼ ­¬®»»¬ º«®²·¬«®»ò ߺ¬»® ¸¿ª·²¹ ·¼»²¬·º·»¼ º«²¼·²¹ ­±«®½»­ô »¨·­¬·²¹ ­·¼»©¿´µ­ ¿²¼ ½®±­­©¿´µ­ ­¸±«´¼ ¾» ¼»­·¹²»¼ ¿²¼ ½±²­¬®«½¬»¼ò ̸·­ ·­ »¨¬®»³»´§ ·³°±®¬¿²¬ ¬± ½®»¿¬·²¹ ¿² ¿¬¬®¿½¬·ª» ¼·­¬®·½¬ ¿²¼ »²½±«®¿¹·²¹ ª·­·¬±®­ ¬± °¿®µ ¿²¼ ©¿´µò øÞ§ ­¸¿¼·²¹ ­·¼»©¿´µ­ô °¿®µ·²¹ ¿²¼ ­¬®»»¬­ô ¿³¾·»²¬ ¬»³°»®¿¬«®»­ ½¿² ¾» ´±©»®»¼ ¾§ éó ïï ¼»¹®»»­ ·² ­«³³»®ò÷ ׳°®±ª»³»²¬­ ¾±¬¸ ©·¬¸·² Ͳ·¼»® д¿¦¿ ¿²¼ ¿´±²¹ Ø·´´½®»­¬ ¿®» ·³°±®¬¿²¬ ¼«®·²¹ ¬¸·­ ¬·³» °»®·±¼ò Í»½«®» ´±²¹ ¬»®³ °¿®µ·²¹ò ̸·­ ·²½´«¼»­ ©±®µ·²¹ ©·¬¸ °®±°»®¬§ ±©²»®­ ¬± »²­«®» ¬¸¿¬ °«¾´·½ °¿®µ·²¹ ·­ ¿¼¼»¼ ¬± ¿´´ ³¿¶±® ®»¼»ª»´±°³»²¬­ ¬¸¿¬ ±½½«® ·² Ͳ·¼»® д¿¦¿ô ¿²¼ ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸» Ý·¬§ ½±²¬®±´­ ·¬­ «­» ¿²¼ ±°»®¿¬·±² ¬± ­«°°±®¬ ¬¸» ¼·­¬®·½¬ò ÔÌøëõ÷ ÑÒÙ ÛÎÓ ÇÛßÎÍ Î»½±²º·¹«®» Ø·´´½®»­¬ ­±«¬¸ ±º Ü¿²·»´ò ׳°®±ª·²¹ ¬¸·­ ­¬®»¬½¸ ±º Ø·´´½®»­¬ ©·´´ ¸¿ª» ±²» ±º ¬¸» ´¿®¹»­¬ ·³³»¼·¿¬» ½·¬§ó©·¼» ·³°¿½¬­ ±º ¿´´ ¬¸» ½¿°·¬¿´ ·³°®±ª»³»²¬­ò ׬ ©·´´ ¸¿ª» ¬¸» »ºº»½¬ ±º ¬«®²·²¹ ¬¸·­ ½±®®·¼±® ·²¬± ¿ ¹®¿²¼ ¾±«´»ª¿®¼ô ¿¬ ¬¸» ­¿³» ¬·³» ¿­ ·¬ ¬¿³»­ ¬®¿ºº·½ ¿²¼ ·³°®±ª»­ °»¼»­¬®·¿² ­¿º»¬§ ¿²¼ ¿¬¬®¿½¬·ª»²»­­ò Ö±·²¬´§ ½±²­¬®«½¬ °¿®µ·²¹ ¹¿®¿¹»­ ©·¬¸ ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ò ׬ ·­ ·² ¬¸·­ ´±²¹»® ¬»®³ ¬·³» ¸±®·¦±² ¬¸¿¬ ±°°±®¬«²·¬·»­ ©·´´ °®»­»²¬ ¬¸»³­»´ª»­ º±® ¿¼¼·²¹ ¬¸» ¹®»¿¬»­¬ ¿³±«²¬ ±º °«¾´·½ °¿®µ·²¹ ¬± ¬¸» д¿¦¿ ¿®»¿ò ׬ ©·´´ ¾» ·³°±®¬¿²¬ ¬± ¸¿ª» ¬¸» º·²¿²½·²¹ ³»½¸¿²·­³­ ¿²¼ ·²½»²¬·ª»­ ·² °´¿½» ¬± ­»·¦» ¬¸»­» ¾®·»º ©·²¼±©­ ±º ±°°±®¬«²·¬§ò Ѳ½» ¬¸»­» ­°¿½»­ ¿®» ¿¼¼»¼ô ¬¸»² ¬¸» ­¬®·°»¼ ·²¬»®·³ °¿®µ·²¹ °®±ª·¼»¼ ·² ¬¸» ­¸±®¬ ¬»®³? ½±«´¼ ¾» ®»³±ª»¼ ¬± ·³°®±ª» ½·®½«´¿¬·±² ¿²¼ °»¼»­¬®·¿² ¿³»²·¬·»­ò îî AGENDA MEMO (6/19/07AGENDA) DATE: June 13, 2007 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Kate Smith, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: Proposed appointments to the Snider Plaza Strategic Plan Committee The City Council held a public hearing and considered the Snider Plaza Strategic Plan at its regular meeting on May 1, 2007. The item was tabled with specific direction for the Plan to be revised and to remove all references to residential uses, the village green and the removal of on- street parking. At this same meeting, it was also recommended by Dennis Wilson from Townscape, Inc. that an advisory committee be appointed to develop detailed standards for the implementation of the Strategic Plan. Adoption of the Strategic Plan by resolution is phase one of plan implementation. The second phase of implementation is to establish the Committee comprised of property owners, merchants and residents to make specific recommendations on development standards and other items outlined in the plan. The proposed appointments to the Snider Plaza Strategic Plan Committee are: Committee Chair 1.Jerry Grable, Councilmember Property owners 2.John Jackson 3.Roger Fullington Property owner and merchant 4.Mike Culwell – Culwell and Sons Merchants 5.Max Fuqua – Plaza Health Foods and Snider Plaza Merchants Association President 6.Marc Hall – Amore, Peggy Sue’s BBQ, Cisco Grill Residents 7.Former Mayor Barbara Hitzelberger – Involved with the development of the 1989 Master Plan for the City 8.Bobby Clark – Board of Adjustment Committee Member 9.Duncan Fulton – Good, Fulton & Farrell Architects Staff members assigned to work with the Committee: Community Development Manager Harry Persaud and Assistant to the City Manager Kate Smith. AGENDA MEMO (6/19/2007 AGENDA) DATE: June 14, 2007 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Gerry Bradley, Director of Parks SUBJECT: Burleson Park Rental Request – Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer 3 Day Walk BACKGROUND: Staff has been contacted by representatives of the Susan G. Komen organization regarding a 3-day Breast Cancer Walk ending in University Park. Organization representatives have requested reserving Burleson Park to act as a holding area for walkers prior to entering the SMU Campus for closing ceremonies. The event and park reservation is scheduled for Sunday, October 28, 2007. The organizers anticipate over 3,500 participants. If this reservation is to be considered by City Council, staff would recommend the following criteria be followed by the Susan G. Komen organization: ? Develop form letter to be distributed to residents within 600 ft. of the park. ? Provide adequate restroom facilities base on number of participants. ? Reduce the number of tent stakes by utilizing water kegs for tent stabilization to reduce impact to irrigation system and turf areas. ? Pay Park Reservation Fee of $1,000.00 (includes part of Saturday, all day Sunday and part of Monday). ? Pay Refundable Security Deposit of $ 300.00. ? Provide Police security at organization’s expense. RECOMMENDATION: Due to the size of the event and the potential impact to area residents, staff is requesting direction from City Council regarding this rental request. ATTACHMENTS: ? Letter of Request AGENDA MEMO (6/19/2007 AGENDA) DATE: June 11, 2007 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Gerry Bradley, Director of Parks SUBJECT: Sis Germany Park Fountain BACKGROUND: In May 2007, staff began the renovation of Sis Germany Park located at the southeast corner of Preston Road and Greenbrier Drive. The 33 year old botanical plantings were old, unattractive and in need of replacement. To date, all overgrown plant material has been removed and replaced with Red Tip Hollies, Gulf Stream Nandinas, Azaleas and Seasonal Color. Decorative lighting, new concrete walkways, new irrigation system and benches will follow in the coming weeks. As part of the project, staff has also been working with Joan Germany to design an area that would support the installation of a decorative fountain at this park site. The fountain itself will compliment not only the park but the entire Preston Road Corridor acting a smaller version of the fountain located in Highland Park at the intersection of Preston Road and Armstrong Parkway. Joan has indicated that she will pay for the fountain as part of the project. The estimated value of the fountain is $13,000.00. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is requesting City Council consider approving the fountain design for installation within Sis Germany Park. Once approved, Joan Germany will purchase the fountain and staff will retain a contractor for the fountain’s installation. ATTACHMENTS: Fountain Picture AGENDAMEMO (06/19/2007 AGENDA) DATE: June 19, 2007 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Harry Persaud, MRTPI, AICP, Community Development Manager SUBJECT: Consideration of an ordinance of the City of University Park, Texas, amending the comprehensive zoning ordinance of the City of University Park, by adding Section 28-106 (a) to provide for a special exception for a front yard fence in the SF-2 zoning district. Background/Analysis: Gilbert J. and Patricia Besing, property owners at 6023 St. Andrews installed an 8 feet wrought iron fence in the required front yard of their home in violation of City Codes. Staff informed the Besings about the violation and requested that they bring their property into compliance with City codes. The subject tract is approx. 0.33 of an acre and it is located in the Single Family “SF-2” zoning district. The Besings applied to the BOA for consideration of a variance. The BOA considered the item at its August 28, 2006 meeting and denied the request. The Besings represented by George Dunlap of Jenkens & Gilchrist then requested an amendment of the zoning ordinance to provide for a special exception which will allow the fence to remain. In 1999, City Council amended the Zoning Ordinance to provide a special exception for a fence within the required front yard in the Single family “SF-1” zoning district. City Council directed staff at its regular meeting on September 26, 2006 to amend the Zoning Ordinance to provide for a special exception. The draft ordinance was considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission at its regular meetings on February 19 and March 19, 2007. Staff mailed 42 notices to property owners within 200 feet of those lots which are to be impacted by the proposed ordinance. A total of 5 responses were received, 3 in favor and 2 opposed. City Council held a public hearing on May 1, 2007 and voted 3 – 0 on a motion to deny the request. Following directions from Council, this item is returned for further consideration at the June 19, 2007. Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Commission voted 4-1 to recommend denial. Attachments: 1. Draft Ordinance 2. Request for Special Exception 3. Property owner responses 4. Minutes of P&Z meetings February 19 and March 19, 2007 MAP SHOWING PROPERTIES TO BE IMPACTED BY PROPOSED ORDINANCE NOTICES MAILED TO OWNERS WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE PROPERTIES TO BE IMPACTED BY PROPOSED ORDINANCE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION HEARING MARCH 19, 2007 SUMMARY OF RESPONSES FOR PZ-07-003 NUMBER OF NOTICES SENT: 42 NUMBER OF RESPONSES: 5 NUMBER OF THOSE IN FAVOR: 3 NUMBER OF THOSE OPPOSED: 2 ORDINANCE NO. _____________________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, AS HERETOFORE AMENDED, BY ADDING SECTION 28-106 (a) TO PROVIDE FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION FOR A FRONT YARD FENCE IN THE SF-2 DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of University Park and the City Council of the City of University Park, in compliance with the laws of the State of Texas with reference to the granting of zoning classifications and changes, have given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and have held due hearings and have forwarded a full and fair hearing to all property owners generally, and City Council of the City of University Park is of the opinion and finds that said zoning changes should be granted and that the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance should be amended; Now, Therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of University Park, Texas, is hereby amended by adding Section 28-106 (a), to read as follows: “ Section 28-106 Special Exception for a Front Yard Fence in the SF-2 District After notice and public hearing, a special exception may be granted by the Board of Adjustment to allow a fence in the required front yard of property in an SF-2 Zoning District where the property is adjacent to and facing the Dallas Country Club, if: (1) The property is at least one-third (1/3) of an acre or greater in size; (2) The Board believes such special exception will not be contrary to the public interest, and: (3) A site plan has been filed with an application for a special exception, containing the following, at a minimum: (a) A layout of the fence on the property, including all gates; (b) A description of the fence, containing the following, at a minimum: i. That the fence will be constructed of wrought iron ii. That the fence will not exceed eight feet (8’) in height above grade at any point, including gates; iii. That the fence will be constructed with openings of not less than seventy-five percent (75%) of the total area of the fence; iv. That the fence will be dark in color, either black or dark green; and v. Written approval of the design of the gates in the fence by the University Park Fire Department, which design shall include a plan for access to the property through such gates in the event of fire or other emergency.” SECTION 2. All ordinances of the City of University Park in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed. SECTION 3. Should any word, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this ordinance, or the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, as amended hereby, be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole or any part or provision thereof, other than the part so declared to be invalid, illegal or unconstitutional, and shall not affect the validity of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as a whole. SECTION 4. That any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions of this ordinance or the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, as amended hereby, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction in the municipal court of the City of University Park, Texas, shall be punished by a fine to exceed the sum of two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense, and each and every day such violation shall continue shall be deemed to constitute a separate offense. SECTION 5. This ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage and the publication of the caption, as the law and charter in such cases provide. DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of University Park, Texas, on the 19 day of June 2007. APPROVED: ____________________________________ JAMES H. HOLMES III, MAYOR ATTEST: ____________________________________ NINA WILSON, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________________ CITY ATTORNEY (RLD/01/20/07)(13136) ORDINANCE NO. ___________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, AS HERETOFORE AMENDED, BY ADDING SECTION 28-106 (a) TO PROVIDE FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION FOR A GRONT YARD FENCE IN THE SF-2 DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Duly passed by the City Council of the Coty of University Park, Texas, on the 19 day of June 2007. APPROVED: ____________________________________ JAMES H. HOLMES III, MAYOR ATTEST: ____________________________________ NINA WILSON, CITY SECRETARY AGENDA MEMO (06-19-07 AGENDA) DATE: June 14, 2007 TO: Bob Livingston City Manager FROM: Gene R. Smallwood, P.E. Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Ordinance ___ annexing a strip of land along Northwest Highway, Airline to Hillcrest. Background. Dallas and University Park City Councils recently approved a boundary adjustment of 6.89 feet along Northwest Highway, Airline to Hillcrest. The screening wall project requires UP to acquire an additional 6.89 feet of right- of-way to meet the requirements of TxDOT for the wall to be a minimum of 8 feet from the NW Highway travel lanes. The boundary adjustment process effectively gave us the necessary R-O-W; however, the attached ordinance incorporates that strip into our City Limits. Discussion. Staff recommends approval of the enabling ordinance. ORDINANCE NO. __________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS, ANNEXING THE TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED AND DEPICTED IN EXHIBITS “A” AND “B”, ATTACHED HERETO AND EXTENDING THE BOUNDARY LIMITS OF THE CITY SO AS TO INCLUDE SAID PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS; PROVIDING FOR AN ANNEXATION SERVICE PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT “C”; AND GRANTING TO ALL INHABITANTS AND OWNERS OF SAID PROPERTY ALL OF THE RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES OF OTHER CITIZENS AND BINDING ALL INHABITANTS BY ALL THE ORDINANCES, ACTS, RESOLUTIONS AND REGULATIONS OF SAID CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF SAID ORDINANCE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of University Park has heretofore entered into a Boundary Adjustment Agreement with the City of Dallas for the annexation of the land described herein into the corporate limits of the City of University Park; and WHEREAS , such tract of land is contiguous and adjacent to the corporate limits of the City of University Park and does not exceed one mile in width; and WHEREAS , after notice was duly published, public hearings on the proposed annexation were held by the City Council of the City of University Park, Texas, all in strict compliance with chapter 43, Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS , the following described land is adjoining the present city limits of the City of University Park and the members of the City Council of the City of University Park have concluded NOW, that said area should be annexed and made a part of the City of University Park, Texas; THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the hereafter described tract of land is hereby annexed to include the said tract of land within the city limits of the City of University Park, Texas, and the same shall hereafter be included within the territorial limits of the said City, and the inhabitants thereof shall hereafter be entitled to all rights and privileges of other citizens of the City and shall be bound by the ordinances, acts, resolutions and regulations of said City of University Park, Texas. Said tract of land situated in -1- Dallas County, Texas, is more fully described and depicted in Exhibits “A” and “B”, attached hereto and made a part hereof, the same as if copied in full herein. SECTION 2. The Annexation Service Plan which is attached to this ordinance as Exhibit "C" is hereby approved and incorporated herein as part of the ordinance. SECTION 3. That it is not the intention of the City of University Park to annex any territory not legally subject to being annexed by the City, and should any portion of the above-described areas not be subject to legal annexation by the City of University Park, such fact shall not prevent the City from annexing such territory which is subject to legal annexation by the City, and it is the intention of the City of University Park to annex only such territory as may be legally annexed by it within the above described area. SECTION 4. That this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage, as the law and Charter in such cases provide. DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of University Park, Texas, on the 19 day of June 2007. APPROVED: _________________________________ JAMES H. HOLMES III, MAYOR ATTEST: __________________________________ NINA WILSON, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM: _______________________________ CITY ATTORNEY (RLD/ORD16152) -2- EXHIBIT A -3- EXHIBIT B -4- EXHIBIT C ANNEXATION SERVICE PLAN In connection with the annexation of an approximately .2120 acre tract of land by the City of University Park, Dallas County, Texas, described in Exhibit “A”, the following service plan is adopted as required by Section 43.056 of the TLGC. EXAS OCAL OVERNMENT ODE The City of University Park will, to the extent it provides or authorizes such services itself or through contractual arrangements with other entities, provide the following services in the area upon the effective date of the annexation of the area: (1) Police protection; (2) Fire protection; (3) Solid waste collection; (4) Maintenance of water and wastewater facilities in the annexed area that are not within the service area of another water or wastewater utility; (5) Maintenance and operation of roads and streets, including road and street lighting; (6) Maintenance and operation of parks, playgrounds, and swimming pools; (7) Maintenance and operation of any other publicly owned facility, building or service; and (8) Emergency medical services. The City of University Park will also provide other services such as planning, zoning, code enforcement, subdivision regulation, animal control, court, construction codes and general administration, to the extent it now provides any such service, on the effective date of the annexation. Full municipal services will be made available to this property immediately upon annexation. Miscellaneous Provisions: (1) This service plan is valid for ten years. Renewal of the service plan is at the discretion of the City of University Park. -6- (2) This service plan does not require a uniform level of full municipal services to each area of the City, including the annexed area, if different characteristics of topography, land use, and population density are considered a sufficient basis for providing different levels of service. (3) This service plan shall not be amended unless public hearings are held in accordance with V.T.C.A., Local Government Code, Section 43.052. (4) This service plan is adopted as Exhibit “B” to the Ordinance annexing the property described in Exhibit “A” to the City of University Park. The City shall provide the area or cause the area to be provided with services in accordance with this service plan. -7- AGENDA MEMO (6/19/2007 AGENDA) DATE: June 14, 2007 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Gerry Bradley, Director of Parks SUBJECT: Gateway Entrance Features BACKGROUND: Over the past several months, staff has been working with Gary Olp of GGOA Architects on the Northwest Highway Wall Project and the Master Plan for Coffee Park. Staff has recently asked Mr. Olp to provide concepts designs for the Gateway Entrance Features at the intersection of Hillcrest and Northwest Highway. The goal of this project is to create a unique and aesthetic entrance into our community, while providing continuity by blending the wall and park project together with this entrance feature. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is requesting City Council consider the selection of a entrance feature scheme and approving a contract for design services with GGOA (with civil and structural engineering from R.L Goodson) for construction drawings for the Gateway Entrance Feature at Hillcrest and Northwest Highway in the amount of $20,000.00. ATTACHMENTS: Concept Drawings AGENDA MEMO (06-19-07 AGENDA) DATE: June 14, 2007 TO: Bob Livingston City Manager FROM: Gene R. Smallwood, P.E. Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Consider request to exchange property near the Peek Service Center. Background. The City Council took action in April to deny the request from Prescott Realty to trade the City’s 4 acre tract at 4419 Worcola for a smaller parcel (from the Shamberger property) north of the Peek service Center. The trade would have included a new parking structure at no direct cost to the City. Prescott now proposes to trade a 10,000 SF parcel north of the Peek Center (non contiguous) for a 10,000 strip of land along the north property line of the service center. The attached exhibits illustrate the proposed tracts. The trade would provide for approximately 25 additional parking spaces. If Council is amenable to the property exchange, staff will work with Prescott to develop a formal contract, which be placed on a future agenda (July) for Council consideration. Discussion. Staff recommends the Council approval of the exchange of properties with Prescott Realty. AGENDA MEMO (6/19/07 AGENDA) DATE: June 14, 2007 TO: Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Robbie Corder, Assistant to the Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Paving Program for Alley Parkway ITEM: nd On May 22 the City Council adopted revisions to the Code of Ordinances requiring property owners to pave the area between the property line and the alley pavement when the property is redeveloped or remodeled (remodel in excess of $10,000). During the discussion of the proposed building code revisions, staff was asked to research the feasibility of an incentive program to encourage property owners not redeveloping the property to also pave the alley parkway. To encourage property owners not required to pave the alley parkway through redevelopment or remodel, a reimbursement program could be developed whereby the City pays for 50% of the costs associated with paving the parkway. Similar to the sidewalk reimbursement program, property owners would hire private contractors to perform the work. Once completed, the property owner would submit a copy of the invoice, and the City would issue a check for 50% of the costs. With aggressive publicity, this program would be successful in attracting property owners to pave the alley parkway. However, there is no accurate method of determining how many property owners might participate. Unlike the sidewalk program, this would be a completely voluntary action on behalf of the property owner; therefore, the City would need to aggressively pursue a public education program informing residents of the reimbursement program. Administrative problems would also exist with a reimbursement program for alley pavement. The sidewalk program is effective since code enforcement officers already measure defective sidewalk and enter the square footage eligible for reimbursement. As of right now, there is no staff available to measure alley parkway on a square footage basis to determine eligible costs for reimbursement. In addition, there would be ancillary issues such as fencing, retaining walls, and gas meters associated with alley parkway paving that might drive up the costs considerably. RECOMMENDATION: Staff does not recommend adopting an incentive program for alley parkway improvements.